TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

johnny_gunn Archive

View 4 posts and 385 comments by johnny_gunn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-19

Growing up I saw my mother divorce my father for no reason at all other than that she didn't love him anymore Lol, right OP, what a shallow reason! So you're not going to date anyone ever because your parents' relationship didn't work out? You should probably talk to a therapist.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:24 PM
1

The university is the one that should be catching the most flack here.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:37 AM
1

That may be true but that's the opposite of what TR6 is saying. You are essentially agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:05 PM
7

You people are fucking clueless. Everyone still uses facebook. -A young person
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:42 AM
-1

It has everything to do with this. The law has to establish if 17-year-olds are children not responsible for their actions or if they can be held accountable. The rule can't be enforced haphazardly across the system. I'm refuting your fundamental argument that 17-year-olds are unable to consent. They are. A 17-year-old willingly having sex with an 18-year-old is not being raped and it's completely ridiculous to suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:20 PM
0

Except plenty of 17-year-olds who are 'unable to consent' sure as hell get charged as adults when they murder someone.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:15 PM
-1

Yeah, I would. Statutory rape is not rape. 16 is the age of consent in my country - in most scenarios it would be completely legal for a 30-year-old to be fucking a 17-year-old, the only reason it would be illegal in your hypothetical is because there's a special provision for teachers.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:14 PM
-17

My point is his comment is useless even if it's accurate. He's beating a dead horse. I suggested he might make it more useful by linking to actual statistics or something.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:46 AM
-49

Hahaha, oh no, my precious karma. I'll gladly take the hit voicing an opinion. This place is an echo-chamber of people who can't see that they embody the things they complain about in feminists.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:29 PM
-46

Then you clearly don't know what an analogy is.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:27 PM
-19

I'm someone who saw this on r/all, came here expecting a good informed discussion, and quickly learned why everyone hates MRAs.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:27 PM
-27

You would be offered a weekly column on Jezebel you twat. Exactly. You'd look like a fucking retard. Just like you do with your comment here. If you need me to defend the existence of bias towards men in any form of sentencing, you do not fucking belong here. So a sourced informative comment is useless, but 'hur dur the mens are oppressed' is a great comment? You act like your opinion matters. It certainly does not. Fuck off to where you came from troll. Classic MRA tactic. Call everyone you dis…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:44 PM
-27

I speak English French and German, and that's completely irrelevant to you having shitty grammar.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:42 PM
-70

It's a definition analogy..I was being snarky when I told the other guy to look up how analogies work, but you actually have to.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:33 PM
-30

We get threads like this all the time and statistics regarding pay gaps, rape statistics, murder statistics, do not need to be brought up every single time someone talks about this stuff. You literally said that you didn't think sourced comments were necessary. How is what I said a strawman? Sorry dude, people don't have to play by your rules and can comment what they want. Yes, they can. And people will continue to think MRAs are whiney idiots when you post stuff like this. Also, you seem to co…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:28 PM
-37

If everybody already knows that's the case then what the fuck is the purpose of the dude's comment? You seem to think a properly-sourced informative comment is useless - then this guy's comment must be beyond fucking worthless.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:15 PM
-93

It's called an analogy. You might want to look up how they work.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:10 PM
-18

And it also isn't rape. Otherwise we would just call them both rape and the word statutatory would not exist. Is this seriously too difficult for you to comprehend?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:09 PM
-19

You're right, they both have rape in the name so they're the same. Just like attempted murder is the same as murder because they both have murder in the name. Fucking retard.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:04 PM
-145

Wow great comment. Hur dur if it was a man he would be in jail. Can you not discuss the content of the article without making shit up? Imagine if I commented on a post in r/feminism about a man being appointed CEO with shit like "hey if it was a woman she wouldn't be paid as much! The patriarchy!!". It's fucking annoying. If you want to do something useful you can link to stats concerning male v. female statutatory rape sentences. As it stands your comment is useless and sounds whiney as fuck.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:44 PM
-32

Stop calling statutory rape rape. It's wrong and makes you look like you're lying in order to appeal to people's emotions. Because you are.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:41 PM
1

You literally don't mean what the word consent means. I don't care about the legal definition - this sub of all places should know that the law says some pretty dumb shit sometimes.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:05 PM
-4

You can say that a man shouldn't get life in prison for marijuana possession all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that he was performing an illegal act in his state. He may say it was medicinal, but legally speaking, that was impossible. He's still guilty of possession and should be punished for it.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 10:49 AM
10

The sex was consensual. If this 'child' committed murder he would be tried as an adult. I don't know why you're peddling this '16-year-olds are little angels who can do no wrong' bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:42 AM
-14

You can find as many examples of 'male privilege' as 'female privilege'. Stop talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:55 AM
11

Whiny comments like this is why everyone hates mensrights. Can't even be happy about a good thing without complaining.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:54 PM
1

ItsBiggerThanksU
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:08 AM
2

What a terrible hashtag. What is that even supposed to mean?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:23 PM
0

The news isn't run by radical feminists dumbass. If you truly believe that then I'll have to agree with everyone that thinks MRAs are insane.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:45 AM
-4

Yes..that's what that term means. You'll find female-dominated also means female-populated. What's your point?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:51 PM
-1

What does this have to do with Men's Rights? It's just a shitty coffee chain being shitty. Why don't you post her blog posts/the email the company sent you somewhere if you want to give them some bad publicity. I don't see why you're posting about this here.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:47 PM
4

The question says "Suppose Gina repeatedly asks her coworker Thomas out to dinner". The answer says date. That said I'm not seriously arguing this I'm just joking around.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:49 PM
-5

Dinner doesn't imply sexual interest.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:26 PM
1

I disagree with your assessment that my analogy is improper. I literally used the same words as OP's comment, I just rephrased it to be about Obama instead of feminists.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:58 PM
-18

What if she was a lesbian?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:57 PM
7

Okay, that may be true. So point that out when it's what actually happened, not when literally the opposite thing happened. It would be like if Obama announced he was disbanding the NSA and everyone commented 'Man, I could just as easily believe a headline saying he was giving the NSA more power, isn't that sad'? There's plenty of real, thought provoking content on this sub, but comments like this just sound whiny as hell. Even when there's good news people need to somehow spin it into being neg…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:33 PM
21

Isn't that just harassment? What's sexual about that?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 07:41 PM
29

Why do people always make these stupid comments. Even on a positive post you have to make some stupid strawman about the opposite outcome.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 07:40 PM
0

Can you imagine the outrage No, I can't. Christ this sub loves straw man arguments. Every other comment on here is "imagine the outrage if ____ happened" while describing a situation that no one would be outraged by.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:49 PM
0

Good. Let's keep overweight people out of fitness model magazines please.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:12 AM
-5

He wasn't forced to do anything, he's doing it because he's a colossal pussy.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:08 AM
2

Isn't this pretty similar to infographics posted here about how there are more men in jail than women?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:05 AM
3

If we're talking about improper word use, why not start with the title of this post? Nobody 'forced' Sweeting to do anything. She was not held at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:28 AM
-3

Is it whiney shitheads?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:43 PM
-20

For a subreddit that hates radfem you guys sure love talking about them. The top comment is always someone imitating one of them.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:29 PM
4

I think you should be complaining when people mention gender as it it matters. Not when people disregard gender because it's irrelevant. This is the opposite of what you should be complaining about.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 06:33 PM
-2

Contradiction a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation that are opposed to one another. Saying "I want to stop rapes" and "I lied about how bad rapes are to make people care about them more" do not contradict each other. I'm not disagreeing that the tactic is unfavourable, but I fail to see a contradiction.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:58 AM
-1

Okay, but how does that contradict Feminist ideas?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:17 AM
0

How is that self-contradictory?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:08 AM
4

Downvoted - title is wrong. This had been proposed by a party that is not in power. It's not something that's already happened.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:50 PM
-1

I don't think they're trying to belittle dads. I mean come on dude, they're saying that every kid loves their dad more than their mom.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:09 AM
0

And women get them without writing the test oorr..? Clearly I'm asking what the gender difference is in regard to driver's license privileges.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:20 PM
1

Driver's license? What does that mean?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:12 PM
-11

Hahahahaha, this is why MR is a joke to lots of people. You guys are hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:55 PM
2

All the maps on the new trains are updated. Not sure about the old trains - I think they are too.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 02:03 PM
16

Your title implies this happens every Sunday, when in fact it's only this Sunday.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:44 PM
-5

Are you people all retarded? What she did was an accident - she doesn't deserve to go to jail for something that could have happened to anyone. What the boyfriend did was deliberate destruction of evidence.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 12:18 PM
2

If you posted something titled 'Women's Rights' to this sub the same thing would probably happen.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:44 PM
10

Why are you making this gender specific? Girls conform to gender roles too.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:53 PM
1

Fuck off. The victim didn't deserve what happened to him, but he was a goddamn idiot. No one deserves to get their ass beat, but if I roll into harlem and start calling people niggers it's probably not gonna end well for me.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:43 PM
-9

Nahh, pretty sure I don't become retarded when I'm scared.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:56 PM
-10

Noo, I would probably leave and call the cops.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:36 PM
-14

They said he has a low IQ. If it was bad enough that he couldn't make rational decisions shouldn't he have had a caregiver? Also, he feared for his life. I hate this excuse. If you fear for you life, call the police. That's how these things work.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:00 PM
-11

Why didn't the guy leave?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:46 PM
3

A link to a search on r/feminism in men's rights You're right - incorrect link. Here's the right one. It's a post in Men's Rights with over 1000 votes discussing an individual rude feminist. and a link to an article in which men's rights discusses a feminist fraudster Uh, did you click the link? It's not talking about a feminist fraudster at all, it's talking about MR complaining about feminism. That's literally the title of the post.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:09 PM
-2

The point of my links is to counter and disprove this statment. I think censorship is the big issue that people take feminist subreddits to task for. Individual commentators being rude, not really on the radar.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:58 PM
-4

Your argument is that we don't bash feminists for being rude, so it's okay that we're rude ourselves? Also that isn't true, here's a post with 1000+ votes that's shit talking a comment in r/feminism, and here's a post with another MR poster specifically saying we shit talk feminism too much.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:50 PM
3

What a level-headed response! Really making MRA look good. These types of comments are exactly what MR will pull from r/femanism and shit talk them for.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:01 PM
-6

Holy shit I am getting tired of the 'woman did something stupid, man would go to jail if he did' posts! Can we make a rule that if you're going to make a comment whose only purpose is to say 'a man would be punished more if he did this' you have to link to a case where a man actually was punished more severely for the same crime?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 12:05 PM
1

What do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:19 PM
3

This man pulled a knife on a navy officer and tried to stab him. Charged with attempted battery.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:14 PM
-3

No it's not, it's also domestic battery. Don't be obtuse.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:04 PM
4

Comments like this are why MRA gets so much flak from the outside community. Are you guys seriously such douches that you can't respond to a reasonable comment without downvotes and insults?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:35 PM
1

Can you link to a case where that had happened?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 11:01 AM
-1

Why would you make such a stupid comment? I know that you're being sarcastic - but who are you making fun of? I've never heard anyone say being a father was easy.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 10:56 AM
2

Definitely stealing.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 10:55 AM
4

You sound like a wackjob.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:42 PM
7

Why are you friends with these people?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:22 PM
-10

Sarcasm should be banned from this subreddit. Christ these comments are annoying.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 10:06 AM
-2

What's wrong with that though? ~ You're the one assuming it's wrong. From my comment 'what's wrong with that' you took that I assume it's wrong?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:10 AM
4

No - maybe it wasn't the best choice of words but you know what I mean. Pecanpig seems to think men are being wronged by women, but I'm saying that men and women play equal parts in how dating/marriage works. Btw your quote's messed up.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:30 AM
10

Yes? Can I ask how old you are? I'm in college and from that one comment alone you seem old and out of touch to me.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:01 PM
3

Men and women are equally at fault for perpetuating this system though.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:55 PM
-6

He didn't explicitly, but I thought he was implying it.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:26 PM
-4

What's wrong with that though? Those men aren't being forced to marry anyone.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:50 PM
-1

What's wrong with that though? Those men aren't being forced to marry anyone.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:49 PM
1

So report on that when it happens?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:04 AM
2

I don't see what this has to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:20 AM
-7

This makes you want to go around assaulting random cops? Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:14 PM
-11

My point is the gender of the victim is irrelevant if the perpetrators would have treated the opposite gender similarly. And I don't see any reason why they wouldn't in this situation.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:46 PM
-10

And rape is an overwhelmingly female problem. Does that make it a 'women's problem'?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:16 PM
-17

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:11 PM
0

That's a good point, but 90% of the people in this thread weren't thinking like that. So it's a poorly worded title, and no one actually checked up on the law.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 11:18 AM
63

Jesus christ MR. Did anyone actually read the law? Men can check on women too.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 10:14 AM
-4

Men's Rights Logic Man gets hit by truck. Something bad happened to a man! Post it in r/MR!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:10 AM
2

Do you have a link that isn't from a blog?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 06:00 PM
1

So because feminists do it we should stoop to their level and do the same?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:40 PM
0

I doubt it. Of those 81,000 50% probably aren't even active, and almost no one is going to go try to edit this wiki. I know I'm not. And doing so would be pretty childish. Clearly these people are below you, so why would you try to mess their things up? You wouldn't be very happy if people who though MR was a sham came here spamming posts, would you?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:32 PM
1

The meme and the "lols keep trying to ban my ip I'll keep coming back!" were pretty unneccesary, as was the second post on the talk page (they obviously weren't interested in talking). That said, this place seems like a shithole.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:29 PM
3

"That's a toilet for boys." Please tell me you don't have children. If you can't figure out how to explain to them what a urinal is, god help you when they ask where babies come from.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:54 PM
2

the urinal situation What? What is 'the urinal situation'?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:48 AM
-6

YOUR FEMALE DAUGHTER WHO IS A GIRL are you missing the part where the MALE FATHER WHO IS A MAN had to go in with her? It's unacceptable for grown men to be in the women's washroom, and for grown women to be in the men's washroom. So yes, they should be expected to wait for the washroom to be free just like anyone else would.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:46 AM
-5

I dunno - I see a very easy solution to this problem - use the men's washroom. I don't know why Chucky Cheese didn't say this.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:44 AM
0

So wait for it to be free? That's how washrooms work.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:38 AM
9

Well I don't see why she should have a special accommodation because she was 'uncomfortable' going into the proper washroom. If you have a child, standard procedure is you go into the washroom that matches the gender of the adult. In this case - the men's room.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:14 AM
6

Why didn't they go to the men's washroom?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:22 AM
5

I'm confused - what are you trying to say?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:00 AM
-1

God you people are whiny. What does this have to do with men, exactly? Why are you people classifying this child as a 'boy' and not just a 'child'? This policy is stupid and harmful to children as a whole, it's not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:44 PM
-6

How's Men's Rights works: sit around bitching about feminism.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:54 PM
2

Typical MensRights logic. "Something bad happened to a man! It must be sexism! Lynch the feminists!" Shit like this is as bad as feminists blaming random non-gender issues on 'the patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:28 PM
1

The fact that you're bothered by my copy pasting shows just how many of these fricken comments there are in the same thread. How does this sarcastic spam help?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:18 PM
1

I know - but those people don't visit mensrights. So why post stuff like that here? No one here, in mensrights, thinks like that.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:17 PM
1

The fact that you're bothered by my copy pasting shows just how many of these fricken comments there are in the same thread. It's to mock feminists elsewhere. Is that really necessary? Real mature of us.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:16 PM
1

Isn't that pretty much what's happening here?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:16 PM
1

Dude, you're in r/mensrights. Everyone here already agrees with you.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:15 PM
1

I don't know about that. If our court system worked properly it would be impossible to be convicted for a crime that you didn't actually commit - so a false accusation wouldn't do anything. Of course that's not how things actually work though.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:14 PM
6

Why do you think that feminists run everything? You have no idea who runs his student union.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:38 AM
-1

She didn't rape anyone. She accused someone of rape. While still horrible they're completely incomparable.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:35 AM
-3

Dude, you're in fucking r/mensrights - no one here thinks like that. These sarcastic comments add nothing to the conversation.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:34 AM
-4

Dude, you're in fucking r/mensrights - no one here thinks like that. These sarcastic comments add nothing to the conversation.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:33 AM
-4

Dude, you're in fucking r/mensrights - no one here thinks like that. These sarcastic comments add nothing to the conversation.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:32 AM
1

Well to be fair, if she's in jail 24/7 she won't be able to make any money to pay the victim with.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:31 AM
1

Why only 2 years? I think a 2 year minimum or what the person you accused actually served (whichever is larger) makes sense for false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:30 AM
-1

What exactly does this comment add to the discussion?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:28 AM
0

Your comment is good except for the part about the record. Obviously it will be expunged. This is already enough of an outrage - don't try to tack on bullshit details.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:27 AM
-1

There's no media hysteria or police involvement because nobody gives a shit. These people are obviously harmless idiots, can you seriously not see that? Yo OP, you're a fag, I'm gonna kill you. Notice how the police haven't arrested me yet?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:27 AM
-12

MR has always been a huge cirlcejerk. It's too bad too - some real discussion would be nice.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:10 PM
-1

Must these sarcastic comments be the top comment in every thread?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:21 AM
-2

Wow, somebody's bitter. If you don't like dating then don't date? I don't see what your issue is. And don't pay for their meal either? I've never gone on a date without getting separate cheques.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:28 AM
26

Justin Bieber wasn't interested in pressing charges - but everyone still thought that was creepy. When you google 'Jenny Mccarthy Justin Bieber' this is the first hit: a globe and Mail article titled "Was what Jenny McCarthy did to Justin Bieber sexual assault?" Stop trying to make a double standard where there isn't one. MR has enough important real issues that we don't need people like you trying to stir up shit.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:17 AM
1

Yes, which is why I said 'the majority' and not 'all'.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:11 AM
2

Stop posting this drivel. The majority of 'society' doesn't think like this.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:53 AM
0

Look up hat an ad hominem is - my comment doesn't contain a fallacy.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:05 PM
1

It makes MR sound like a bunch of whiny 12-year-olds complaining about stupid shit - because that's what this post is. So people see stuff like this and they take MR less seriously.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:00 PM
54

Stop posting comments by idiots on message boards to Mens Rights. It makes MR lose credibility.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:55 PM
-18

Shut the fuck up. That's obviously not what she meant.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:17 PM
-15

Oh shut the fuck up. You're seriously going to argue that the lawyer wouldn't have cried about a man? How do you know that? She shouldn't be crying for either, she's a lawyer - it's her job to be composed.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:16 PM
-5

God, the regular top posts like these are what make people think MRA is a bunch of whiny bitches. This is an isolated case of a crazy chick. Everyone, everyone (including MRAs, feminists, and neither) will agree that this chick is crazy. This isn't a men's rights issue, it's a one-off crazy person. With all the real problems men face, can we please stick to those and leave bullshit like this out?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:47 AM
-1

Why does having a kid mean he is forced to support some other adult? Adults should support themselves. He has his own bills to pay, he doesn't need to pay hers, too. He said he wanted to pay child support. Not everyone views their offspring as material objects that should be disposed of as soon as possible. From what I understand, OP was happy to be able to send money to support his child, he was just pissed about visitation bs.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:25 AM
-2

Calm down it's only at -1. You were downvoted because your response was idiotic. You criticize this woman for assuming you're a rapist, when you yourself are the one assuming that she is assuming that.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:29 AM
0

How did she destroy his life?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:37 AM
-1

How do you know she assumed you were a rapist? I can't believe so many people upvoted this thinking it was relevant to men's rights. So you met some crazy chick on the street - who cares? Almost everyone will agree that this chick is crazy - feminists and MRAs alike.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:43 PM
-1

Why wouldn't he be paying CS? He wanted to have that kid. Even if a 'financial abortion' was a thing, OP didn't want to have one. Or her habit of maliciously denying visitation? That's illegal and he should take it to court. In fact, OP said that he did and that has been rectified.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:34 PM
0

Okay, what was done wrong morally?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:33 PM
0

when the appropriate measures have been taken and the other party actively tries to counteract those measures, there should be some recourse. What did she do to counteract those measures? I never had an issue with paying child support. I take responsibility for my actions. I did have an issue with not being able to see my son because she wouldn't hold up her end of the agreement and I couldn't afford to travel to see him as often as I would have liked. This was later rectified, much to her chagr…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:32 PM
0

Uh, yes it does. It's as much his child as it is the woman's child. I'm all for 'financial abortion', but from OP's post it doesn't sound like he wanted to do that. He wanted to have the kid.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:31 PM
-11

So? Dick move by her, but what was done wrong legally?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 01:45 AM
-14

Sorry - what's wrong here? He has a kid that he willingly fathered. He and the wife are separated, she has custody, he pays child support.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:20 AM
-2

Oh man, someone said something dumb on the Internet. Who cares?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:08 PM
12

He edited his comment.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:46 AM
17

I don't think you meant to put this here. I was just correcting grammar.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:14 AM
1

She could have accused him of all this shit whether they were married or not.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:12 AM
0

"johnny gunn". What does this have to do with his marriage? She could just as easily be framing her boyfriend or brother instead of her husband.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:09 AM
-4

This has nothing to do with marriage.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:20 AM
-5

Shut up.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:20 AM
0

Link to that happening in Canada?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:19 AM
-1

How is obamacare sexist?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:07 AM
-9

No they don't. Men have lower average lifespans in the Western world because dangerous jobs tend to be worked by men (firefighters, etc) which skews the average. Men die from health causes at about the same rate.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:07 AM
61

*should have
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:05 AM
0

Sensationalist headline. Statutory rape =/= rape. Regardless of your opinions on how bad statutory, you have to agree that it's very different than rape. Let's not confuse the two.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:03 AM
-4

How did I miss the point? Because you don't agree with me?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:19 PM
-4

How did I misunderstand the commenter's point? I understood fine, and I disagree.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:50 PM
-9

I don't care about OP's link, I'm responding to rottingchrist and all the people that upvoted him who said that they're never nice to strange women in case they get accused of rape.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:23 PM
-18

God you people are useless human beings. You never help strangers in case you're accused of rape?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:46 PM
-9

You posed a reasonable, civilly-worded question and were downvoted to oblivion. Welcome to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:22 AM
11

Wow MRA. Assuming bad things about her because of her name is exactly what the girl in OP's picture did..
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:26 PM
0

Uhh, how is this news? Who cares if some people reported him to police? You can report anyone for anything, doesn't mean it'll do anything.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:37 PM
6

Why are you friends with these people?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:39 AM
-3

You're completely right! See how annoying my comment is because it's unhelped sarcastic bullshit? So is the one I'm replying to, and hopefully mine showcases how annoying it is so people will stop doing it.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:28 AM
2

Do you have a source for that? I'm asking honest questions politely here and you guys are downvoting me.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:12 AM
-6

The first part is sarcastic, the second is serious. Yes, we get it, there are cases of women falsely accusing their husbands of domestic violence. No need to sarcastically point it out on every post, the horse has been pulverized.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:10 AM
4

You're right, but false accusations aren't gender specific. It'd be interesting to see the amount of false accusations made by men vs women. That would be hard to measure though, because I'd guess some accusations are never proven false.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:26 AM
6

This woman's batshit insane, clearly, but I'm having a hard time seeing the relevance to men's rights, can someone help me out here? Obviously her genius plot didn't work, she's getting 10 years and evidently her husband is receiving custody. How is this crazy woman's actions demeaning to men?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:09 AM
-1

Why would you post such a groundless negative comment? She got 10 years, if you're going to post something like what you did at least make it constructive. Find some statistics on what sentences men/women have received for similar crimes.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:07 AM
2

Hahaha so funny. 10th time I've seen this comment this week!
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:06 AM
1

Can you link some examples of that? A guy sent Obama HIV-infected blood a few years ago and got some slap-on-the-wrist court-ordered medical treatment.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:04 AM
1

Fucking Skylar. . Sorry.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:02 AM
1

You're saying I object to typhonblue's comment not because I object to it, but because I object to other comments of theirs? That's not true, I've never interacted with typhonblue in the past. However, I do see comments similar to this one a lot on this sub, and they're unhealthy and unhelpful, see my comment here.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:53 PM
4

No one that matters is commenting that on this particular post. In fact, no one at all is. So there's no need to make up criticisms. Your comment is essentially saying "if some sexist braindead guy was here, he'd probably say this ____!" Who cares?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:45 AM
42

Stop talking so negatively. It's all you ever see in this sub. Do you see any comments here or on the original facebook post by women saying "he got that because he was a man!"? Because I don't.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:02 AM
2

Yeah, just never see movies again.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:14 PM
1

I use yelp because there isn't a better alternative.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:13 PM
1

*fathers. That's shitty of them, glad it was resolved.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:12 PM
5

You're right in a legal sense, but I think they should be shamed for having a policy of censoring whatever (non-graphic/illicit) stuff they feel like.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:55 PM
4

I don't like this title. It doesn't matter if it's true or not - facebook shouldn't be able to remove any information that isn't illegal.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:45 PM
1

the outcome in which these women won't be punished for their horrible acts against men What outcome? All you've posted is a question. I sicken you, huh? Let's keep it civil buddy, this is an open forum.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:31 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:03 AM
-2

Are you fucking kidding me MR? This is the top post right now? Some idiot on facebook posting something that everyone with half a brain (including your standard feminist) thinks is retarded?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:38 AM
2

lololol, someone said something dumb in a comment on the internet. Front page of r/mensrights. ಠ_ಠ Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:11 AM
1

What I'd hate to see is the idea that a fetus is a person when the mother wants it to be but not when she doesn't want it to be. that is currently what the law states under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act Haha, what do you mean 'that is what the law states'. I highly doubt the law is "a fetus is a person when the mother wants it to be but not when she doesn't want it to be". Can you post the actual law please?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:00 AM
8

This is fake, made by some moron. And even if it wasn't, Amy is literally famous for being a moron. How is this on MR's front page?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:13 AM
1

Maybe, but that's not what he's saying, he's just being annoying.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:53 PM
0

It's not funny, and it doesn't help anything.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 10:51 PM
10

Stop making up imaginary retard feminists to fight with - that doesn't help us.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:28 PM
-13

This is a retarded post. The state rep would be in just as much trouble if he referred to men (or anyone for that matter) as 'dicks'.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:06 AM
2

She spells woman 'womyn' in the title of the third post down. Regardless, it's fake either way whether it's satire or a 'troll'.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:11 PM
6

This is such an obvious troll. Her writing is so poor (ridiculous spelling mistakes etc.) there is no way she works in a university's admissions department.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:17 AM
2

Ah, the classic sarcastic top comment that stopped being clever about 200 threads ago.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:04 PM
3

;)
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:16 AM
0

Are you sure this isn't because of age and not sex? I'm a young guy, and if I had a massage I'd want it to be done by a young girl.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:33 PM
1

I know you're joking, but at a certain point that ceases to matter. This dumb sarcastic shit makes you sound as retarded as radical feminists. No one will take the mrm seriously when the top post of every thread in r/mensrights is this dumb sarcasm.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:16 AM
5

Can you link to the post you made please?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:53 AM
1

Your contention is that my contention is invalid. Neither of us have evidence. My statement is "the law will be upheld". You're saying "nuh uh!" without a source to prove it.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:53 PM
0

I don't need to prove my contention, you need to prove yours. I'm saying that men and women are equally charged for the same crime (of child molestation) - that's just what makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 10:56 PM
15

I'm not saying it isn't wrong, but it's not discriminating either. Forced labour camps in North Korea are wrong, but they have nothing to do with racism against black people.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:56 AM
10

No, it means that this isn't a gender issue. If a woman was in the man's place, she'd face the same charges, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:39 AM
7

How is insulting to remind someone they're a minority? I don't think latinos feel 'insulted' because they aren't the dominant race in America, for example.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:47 AM
7

Why the fuck didn't you call the police after you got beat up? Why the fuck didn't you call the police to inform them of the false-rape claim?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:02 AM
0

(of course it is not because feminist sexism means the fathers know they can't win) That is the stupidest line of logic I've ever heard. If you don't fight for your custody, you fully deserve not to have it, and you're a dick because not only are you hurting yourself but you're enforcing the precedent that women generally receive custody. To quote Wayne Gretzky, "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take".
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:57 AM
-2

(of course it is not because feminist sexism means the fathers know they can't win) That is the stupidest line of logic I've ever heard. If you don't fight for your custody, you fully deserve not to have it, and you're a dick because not only are you hurting yourself but you're enforcing the precedent that women generally receive custody. To quote Wayne Gretzky, "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take".
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:54 AM
8

Was this not consensual? The age of consent is 16 in GA, so except for the 15-year-old I don't see what was illegal here.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:42 PM
4

Feminism is bankrupting society, or how everyone should be a Men's Rights supporter You really could've chosen a better title.. Imagine if a feminist club hosted a discussion titled "Men's rights is digressing society, or how everyone should be a feminist." I understand you're trying to push people's buttons, but if I saw the headline I just made up my immediate reaction would probably be to be pissed off.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:54 PM
4

Someone said something dumb on the internet and it's the top post on MensRights? What is this, r/atheism?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:43 PM
-8

So IoSonoPlutus really believes that it's misogyny to ask a woman to prove the child inside her that she claims is yours is indeed yours? Get out a dictionary and review what sarcasm is please, you'll need a firm grasp of it to understand half the things said in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:18 PM
-24

Shut up with the sarcasm. It doesn't help anything.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:58 PM
3

He asked for an example of being penalized for harming females.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:53 PM
1

Who is sending him death threats? Link?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:21 PM
-4

If he truly believes what he does nothing should be able to sway that.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:45 AM
0

As nice as a sentiment that it is, emailing him saying he's great isn't really helping anything.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:35 AM
2

What does this have anything to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:29 PM
0

I know that the United States isn't currently at war, yes. I don't think a draft should ever be instituted, not even in the event of catastrophic war.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:32 PM
0

Good job America! Now get rid of the fucking draft.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:12 PM
-7

Your example is a stupid one. You're saying that since a 5-year-old is suspended for talking about a fake gun that this girl should be too. But that 5-year-old shouldn't have been suspended in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:14 AM
0

No you fool. It baffles me that you can't understand this. Let me give you an example. One day I said "I am going to kill Joe". I was quoted saying this in the New York Times. The next day I killed Joe with a knife. The details of the killing were reported on in the Toronto Star. What knutzz, Gr8WhiteGrammarNazi and I are asking for is the New York Times article, not the Toronto Star article. We are asking for a source for where she claimed this, not a source for the evidence.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:59 PM
3

The lack of logic employed by the people in this subreddit baffles me.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:57 PM
-7

He means he wants a source saying she claimed she contacted the police numbnuts..
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:41 PM
2

I think this would be more effective without switching the genders..
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:40 AM
1

Everybody knows that SRS is full of whackjobs, why did you bother posting this?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:07 AM
2

Uhh, did you even read the article you linked? It's only about a man poking holes in condoms, nothing about a woman stealing sperm.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:14 PM
0

I'm not sure why you're posting this here because save for the first word it isn't a reply to me.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:43 PM
6

This sarcastic shit that's on every single post in the subreddit is seriously getting old..
/r/MensRights25/12/12 02:51 PM
-1

a return date for Tuesday, 1/2/12. I think you accidentally a year.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 02:50 PM
0

How is this discriminating against men?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 01:23 AM
-39

Shut the fuck up you moron. This is the retarded thinking that makes people hate r/mensrights. No they don't have to be women, no the cops/jury will not think a gangrape/assault went down.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:01 PM
7

You and your boyfriend are idiots. Don't call the non-emergency police number, call 911 and say "there's some crazy bitch in my house hitting me and breaking shit", I guarantee the police will come remove her, and her false-rape statements won't be taken seriously by anyone. Who're they gonna trust? The level-headed property owner? Or the cracked out crazy chick.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:00 PM
1

First para of the link.. The penetrative sexual offence is no longer gender-specific
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:55 PM
1

I don't understand how this discriminates against men. Could someone explain?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:24 AM
3

How is some idiot's comment indicative of anything? Why are we wasting time looking at this? This is like me writing "fuck females, are women are pigs" as a youtube comment and it making the front page of a feminism subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:39 AM
4

What the fuck is wrong with Americans? Or maybe it's just you. In Canada mother's day and father's day are treated equally. In fact I probably go more all out on father's day because I can actually think of something interesting that my dad'll enjoy, my mom I have to resort to the standard stuff.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:46 AM
2

That's not true, what the hell are you talking about?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:02 AM
-2

So we're just gonna take your word for it?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:19 AM
-5

That doesn't prove shit.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:19 AM
0

Why would there be a news report about that though? To prove my point, I can't find any news articles on the internet about this particular case.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:24 AM
2

I do doubt that though. So many thousands of court cases are conducted daily - I doubt this would make news. And if for some reason it did; the news that he was acquitted would be just as big. And then the news that he sued her for defamation.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:47 PM
0

Where on the internet? I live in Canada and am fairly sure there's nowhere these things are posted online - in fact I''m not sure if that's even legal.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:46 PM
0

I doubt anyone will think anything actually. How would anyone know this even happened? Only if the guy brings it up.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:56 AM
4

Why is this in MR? It's just cosmo teaching stupid women to be assholes. Nothing to do with discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 09:10 PM
28

The information in the title is useless to MR without the same statistics for women.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:23 PM
-9

They're not.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:14 PM
1

Oh there isn't, I just wanted to throw Walter Sobchak out there.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:18 PM
2

Well he shouldn't have.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:17 PM
1

Yeah. Alright I'm done here.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:01 PM
-2

A few things.. First off, the girls were 13. If an adult women offered a lift home to two 13-year-old boys under fairly safe weather conditions I'd find that odd too. Secondly, he says they were dressed improperly, while the police claim otherwise, red flag right there. Thirdly, why would he plead guilty?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:32 PM
1

*Not women, 13-year-olds.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:30 PM
2

And so are guys? Maybe it's a Canadian thing..
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:19 PM
1

I'm not sure if it's possible to cite evidence for this that isn't anecdotal, but just think about how much media there is concerning male masturbation, eg. 'caught my roommate jacking off' stories or that scene from "I love you man". Guys will bring it up in conversation with each other fairly naturally. Female masturbation seems to be talked about and normalized much less.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:37 AM
2

On the flipside though.. Male masturbation is generally considered 'normal' while female isn't. From what I can gather men and women tend to get off at about equal rates, but for some reason men are expected to while women aren't, to the point that women will lie about it to save face.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:00 AM
-7

Really? We're linking shit from 4chan now?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:10 AM
9

Well, instead of brooding about this silently on our little subreddit, might I offer a plan of action? I can't say I'm familiar with this chick. A) If she's a total moron, why are we bothering talking about her? B) If she's not a total moron, has anyone attempted to contact her with an email about how stupid her statement was?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:03 AM
1

Fill me in, what's this a response to?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:20 AM
-4

Brilliant! Let's abort all children who have separated parents.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:27 PM
2

Thank you for expressing your views civilly. To show you what I mean, here's a couple similar articles where women were on the receiving end of similar rulings. http://mashable.com/2009/10/10/facebook-poke-arrest/ Woman arrested for poking someone on facebook who had an order of protection against her http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jun/16/facebook-juror-jailed-for-eight-months Woman jailed for 8 months for using Facebook when she was forbidden to, being a juror
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:53 PM
1

No, I wouldn't have, but that's a different case entirely. Sexism towards black people occurs (occurred) statistically far more than sexism towards white people. Men and women are both discriminated against all the time, in fairly equal numbers.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:45 PM
1

and the press and public would be all over him if he abused it in other directions SAYS WHO?! While that may be true, this article doesn't show that.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:43 PM
-2

And he did something stupid. Stupid, but not necessarily sexist.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:06 AM
-6

Yeah, but this is my issue with a lot of MR posts, especially as of late. While you may be "willing to bet" that that's true, and I may be inclined to agree with you, OP's link shows no evidence of that. It just shows a man getting fucked over. We could just as easily link a story about a woman getting hassled at a supermarket and claim that they were sexist towards women. A single case without any background doesn't show anything constructive.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 02:38 AM
-14

Why is this in Men's Rights? This is a stupid judge who made a stupid ruling and I hope this guy takes action against it. But there's nothing to say the same judge wouldn't have made the same ruling against a woman.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:40 AM
1

(I don't live in the UK) but the directive on equal treatment in the supply of goods and services (gender discrimination disallowed in terms of goods and services) was introduced in 2004, and I'm pretty sure the insurance directive was implemented late last year.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 02:13 AM
-1

So, ladies of the work place, I hope you're happy! No need to make yourself sound like an asshole in an otherwise reasonably-worded post. This is not the fault of "ladies of the work place", it's the fault of idiots (of both genders) who employ and perpetuate stupid zero-tolerance policies.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:59 PM
1

I don't care about internet points, I just want to know why people disagree with me. A number means nothing to me, words do. If people tell me why they disagree with what I'm saying, perhaps I'll see their view and be able to be more constructive in the future.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:11 AM
0

Thanks, that hadn't occurred to me. To the rest of Men's Rights who downvoted a valid post without explanation; fuck you.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:54 PM
-4

10 seconds into reading this: Male teachers, by contrast, awarded them higher marks than external examiners. If we assume there are an equal number of male and female teachers then this would level out. This is still a sexism issue, but the article says that it's applied equally to men and women.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:32 AM
3

Worst public defender ever.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:53 AM
1

Stop trying to twist my words when I am in fact agreeing with you. Are you really trying to say a policeman is as likely to use force and the same amount of force on a woman as on a man. No, I'm not trying to say that at all. What I'm saying is we can't use a video of police beating a group of people wearing red to assume that police hate all people wearing red. This video provides no frame of reference as to how the same cops would react to women, and thus it is useless as a point of discussion…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 01:59 AM
1

Accepting the punishment for something you didn't do is akin to admitting that you did in fact do it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:18 PM
2

And that's fine and dandy, post those statistics. This story itself doesn't show any sexism, just douchebaggery.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:12 PM
1

Can someone give me a TLDR of what happened please?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:32 AM
2

Jesus christ, can we stop posting everything bad that happens on MensRights? These cops are discriminating against men, they're just being assholes. We have no reason to assume they wouldn't do the same thing to women, not from this story in particular anyway.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:51 AM
2

Dude, why did you put up with going to detention for something you didn't do?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:51 AM
-2

No, you fucking idiot, I couldn't give less of a shit about karma. My point was that people should give words to their criticism instead of just pushing a button. Perhaps if someone would actually say something intelligent I'd see what was wrong with what I said.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:13 AM
-10

To the >15 people who downvoted me and didn't take the time to reply why they thought what I said was unconstructive, I bid you a collective fuck you.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:32 PM
-32

There is so much missing to this story. First off, I'm a little skeptical because this is coming from some guy's blog (and it takes him ages to get to the point too) and not a verified news source. Secondly, he should have gone to newspapers with his story, because he clearly wants it to be heard. Thirdly, cops usually don't just pull shit like this, so I'm inclined to think some important details have been left out. Giving his story the benefit of the doubt, why was there no mention of filing a…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:34 PM
1

That judge should be disbarred, but your title is misleading. This thankfully ended in favour of ethics.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:24 AM
1

I don't think it would be disgusting or unacceptable if the tables were turned. It would still be 'just a joke'. It's a pretty bad joke either way, but that's all it is.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:22 AM
-4

Did you read the example I put in my post? If I saw the same ad applied to a dealership selling hummers (with the brain sizes reversed) it wouldn't be any worse, but just as stupid. If the tables were turned it would be just as 'shocking and offensive' as it is now. Like I said, it's a really stupid idea by the store owner but I think it's less of an example of sexism, and more of stupidity.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:48 PM
-2

This is stupid, but not a men's rights issue. Like seriously, how dumb are the owners of that store, they think insulting their client base is going to make them buy their stuff? If I saw the same ad applied to a dealership selling hummers (with the brain sizes reversed) it wouldn't be any worse, but just as stupid.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:40 PM
16

Please don't place things in quotes that aren't real quotations.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:53 PM
1

You can guarantee that, can you? This was clearly handled absolutely horribly and is far from the norm, so something like this was just as likely to happen to a female. This has as much to do with his being male as his being white or having black hair.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:09 PM
-2

What the absolute tits does this have to do with men's rights. His getting fucked over has nothing to do with him being male.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:05 AM
0

Yeah, okay, maybe it's different in America (but I doubt it) but here in Canada the two holidays are valued perfectly equally.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:01 AM
-3

What? That's total BS, Mother's Day and Father's Day are treated pretty equally.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:59 PM
1

And you, antifeministmedia, who the hell do you think you are? Downvoting and insulting me because I have the same views as you but a different idea of how to express them is pretty assholish behaviour, and that's what I've experienced on this subreddit, from you and others.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:56 AM
0

I'm sorry mensrights, but you're as bad as the feminists.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:27 PM
1

How about: Don't get married until divorce law becomes sane. Do you expect us to shoot the judges if we get an unfair settlement? Seriously... what? Seriously, you fool. You claim idiocy on my part for suggesting we fight unfair settlements, while yourself suggesting we wait "until divorce law becomes sane". How do you think that's going to happen if people like you and I don't do something about it?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:26 PM
-2

Not to be a dick, but people saying "Fuck it, I just won't get married" is precisely what encourages unethical divorce settlements. Making divorce unfair a norm is not something anyone; men's rights activists or feminists should be vying for.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:53 AM
4

I honestly couldn't tell if he was sarcastic or not. Allow me to link you to my thoughts on the comment. Here
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:41 AM
4

It doesn't matter how many divorces occurred, or who they were initiated by, but if the wealth was allocated correctly or not. If not, that is what we should be arguing for, proper wealth allocation, not abolishing marriage entirely.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:39 AM
-1

My parents are in their fifties and still happily married, as are the parents of the majority of my friends. This is the same as those pro-vegetarian ads that annoy the crap out of me, which tell you all about how horribly animals are treated on farms, and suggest going vegetarian. The solution to that problem is lobbying for animals to be treated better, not to become a vegetarian. Similarly, "don't get married" as an end-all solution to this problem is goddamn ridiculous. Something more practi…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 01:12 AM
-3

Divorce =/= unfair divorce that ruins your life.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 12:14 AM
-6

Well, never marrying because there's a low chance you'll get fucked over by a divorce makes as much sense as abstaining from sex because you might get pregnant. As shitty as the possible outcome is, I really don't think you can abolish all marriages every because of it.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 11:30 PM
-8

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:44 PM
1

I was wondering how such dolts could possibly work for a news corporation. Then I realized it was Fox.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 02:00 AM
1

We're agreed then. I think it's a stupid statement in the first place, said by either gender.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 10:37 PM
2

I didn't think it was okay in the first place..and most everyone I know would agree.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 04:10 AM
-12

I think this is another case of joking/crazy people making jokes/saying crazy shit. I think the majority of people reading this either perceive it in a joking fashion (the "fuck you for breaking my pencil, I'm going to kill you" fashion) or think she's a wackjob. So similarly if justin timberlake or someone said words to the same effect, they'd be met with the same response of either thinking he was joking, or insane.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:00 PM
-7

Thank you.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:58 AM
0

I could boil down every relationship you've had in your life to Stockholm syndrome, but that would be silly. As is comparing this situation to Stockholm syndrome.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:40 AM
-1

It really depends on the kid. I could argue because I'm a fundamental christian (I'm not really) that my son doesn't really love another man, he's just been deluded.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:46 AM
-8

Who are you to say this is comparable to Stockholm Syndrome? At 16 you are a living thinking person, you're no longer a child. She made a decision that she was happy with, I don't think we can boil that down to mental illness.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:33 AM
0

To clarify, you think it should be more than 7 years?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 09:43 PM
0

Does this video showcase that? No.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 09:01 PM
5

Probably about the same?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:59 PM
-14

How is this possibly a men's rights issue? She's a bitch, but this isn't a sexism issue. This is the same as that viral video from a bit back about the guy telling a group of skater's he'd claim they'd assaulted him if they didn't leave. This shouldn't be the focus of MR's arguments.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 07:06 AM
1

Girls can give up custody- and all obligations to the child If the girl gave up custody but the man wanted custody, chances are he'd get it, and she might even pay child support.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 08:02 PM
17

Where is he attacked and downvoted? In the comment thread you linked, his two comments currently have 70 and 44 points, respectively.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:09 AM
2

Thanks, I agree with that.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 05:50 PM
4

Well, not by me he wouldn't.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 05:49 PM
-1

Well if we agree that statutory rape isn't unethical in many cases should they really be considered a sex offender?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 05:48 PM
-10

But is that really unethical? Statutory rape and rape are very different things. At 16 you're only enough to know what you're doing, and the sex was consensual. I think the 16-year-old kid is just as liable for the occurrence of pregnancy as the of-age teacher. Similarly if the teacher was male and the 16-year-old was female, the female would be just as liable for the child.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 02:49 AM
2

Not to be a dick, but living in Texas =/= being an authority on Texas law. Do you have a link to support your statement?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 02:44 AM
5

That's assuming he does have to pay. What I asked for was a source.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 01:46 AM
24

Thank you for your voice of reason.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 12:02 AM
13

Can you source that?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 12:01 AM
5

What can we do about this? Someone give me a petition to sign or something. There has to be some way to fix this.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:09 AM
2

Come on, MR. How has no one pointed out yet that at the time of this post the guy's comments both had 0 upvotes? They were downvoted to hell and he's since deleted them. This isn't something we should be worried/dwelling on.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:55 AM
1

Alright, I agree with your points on the whole, but in terms of number 1 I can't find any specific bills that are being passed concerning gender-based punishment.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 11:26 PM
1

My point is that these are rare cases and by no means the norm, and that similar verdicts have been reached for male and female offenders alike.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 11:16 PM
1

Okay, and then there's Christopher Brosky, guilty of first-degree who received 10-years probation. These are causes of either the flawed justice system, or our missing context in terms of what caused the judges/jury to come to these conclusions. I don't see sexism being a factor here.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:22 PM
1

I never said anything about judges being lenient to women. I said that the women-only prisons are currently hypothetical.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:53 PM
1

You're right, but I still don't think the life expectancy difference can exactly be explained by sexism.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:48 PM
2

Males aren't forced to work more dangerous jobs. Every police officer is a police officer by choice. Women tend to work lower-paying jobs either by choice or out of necessity, but there's nothing sexist about that either. If a middle-class woman wants to work a high-paying job, she can, and she should be given the same salary as a man.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:49 AM
3

Yes, but how is this a 'female privilege'? That's the same as saying 'probably going to like grapes' is a male privilege, because more males happen to like grapes than females.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:22 AM
1

I looked at your links, and they seem horribly sexist, but fortunately only hypothetical. I don't think we're going to see women's prisons closing unless the same occurs for men.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:16 PM
1

Sorry, I think I mixed up mortality rate/life expectancy. I'm not sure of the explanation for longer life expectancy for females, but I'd guess it has roots in men generally occupying higher-risk professions etc. In any case, I don't think the cause of this is rooted in sexism. You make a good point. But what I meant was unhealthy sexual interactions isn't necessarily a sign of sexism. If you're in an unhealthy relationship, those can be resolved on a case-by-case basis.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:14 PM
1

Heh, life expectancy discrepancy. What I meant is, if 105 males are born to each 100 females, you would expect males to have a 5% higher mortality rate.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:11 PM
1

Oh, I will. I'm trying to bring better conclusions through discussion, so I appreciate you addressing my points. 1 - I'm out of the loop on this, what specifically is being drafted into legislation? 2 - Yes, that happens, but OP said "PMS is usually considered an extenuating circumstance.", implying it could be used as an excuse for a crime or something, well, important, which I disagree with. 4 - It's still sexism, yes, but I have never experienced someone using the term 'ladies first' in a sex…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:07 PM
0

I meant if you have an issue with what I said, please respond with a comment, instead of just downvoting my post so it gets buried.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:34 PM
2

-49. I have the privilege of being unaware of (or feigning ignorance about) my female privilege. After all, everybody knows the world is biased against females. This is the tendency, yes.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:03 AM
-9

-49. Um, sex is an entirely mutual thing, yes women can do things 'wrong', as can men. This shouldn't be an issue in healthy relationships. -50. The same applies to men.. -51. What the fuck? How racist can you be? Any one can marry whoever they like.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 08:59 AM
12

Alright, let's take a look at this. Please try to refute my arguments civily if you disagree, as appose to downvoting me. -1. On average I will get much lighter punishment for the same crime. True, but the extent of this is lessening every day. -2. PMS is usually considered an extenuating circumstance. I have never seen PMS seriously used as a viable excuse for anything. Men could argue 'testosterone' just as easily. -3. I am not expected to go to war or even drafted into the army. True, and tha…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 07:51 AM
3

"I scratch your back, you scratch mine" is precisely the attitude I'm trying to promote. I'm saying those with the skill to do something that their SO can't should help out their SO if they're in need. My secondary point was that even if you share a skill with your SO, such as the ability to prepare a meal, making meals for each other is a nice thing to do.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:43 AM
26

This is the stupidest comparison I've ever heard. If she asks you to fix her car it's probably because she can't do it herself. If my car broke and my girlfriend happened to know how to fix it and I didn't, you're damn right she'd fix it for me if she's at all a decent person. You can fix a sandwich yourself, but unless your relationship with your SO is horrible I'm sure if you said "Hey, I'm really tired, could you make a sandwich for me please?" she would. And you should do the same for her, s…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 02:43 AM
1

Here's an article from 2008 about three men involved in a lawsuit against the federal government, I'm not sure what became of it: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08286/919345-84.stm I just found out recently that the united states still employs selective service, and regardless of its gender discrimination I'm pretty shocked.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:11 PM
4

Alright. Too many times I hear someone arguing about something about gender x countered with "But gender y has this which is so much worse!" Not the point, people.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 06:40 AM
39

Ugh. You too are suffering from the argument that is held too many times in between advocates of men's rights and advocates of female's rights. It doesn't matter who has it worse. You shouldn't be fighting for men's rights exclusively. Women shouldn't be fighting for women's rights exclusively. Everyone should perceive issues in terms of equality for both sexes.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 06:29 AM
12

I doubt this will end in her favour. Please do a follow-up once decisions have been made.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:08 PM
1

You are right. Now that I see the context what you said makes sense, my comment should be considered when posting about gender-neutral situations.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:52 PM
-8

How is that relevant? We're not talking about women abusing a law that favours men, we're talking about a woman abusing a gender-neutral law.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:50 PM
-9

You're right, I only skimmed the youtube video, but I think regardless of the context my version makes a bit more sense. If we had just read a link about a group of women murderers being spared jailtime due to a legal loophole I would probably respond "Fuck! We need to fix this so that people can't abuse it anymore." as appose to "Fuck! We need to fix this so that women can't abuse it anymore."
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:17 PM
-11

Why did you need to throw the word 'women' in there? Allow me to re-word your comment for you. Completely agree. However what fucking moron does not get a prenup with 190 mil. at stake? I hate the laws, if people are going to consistently abuse the laws to screw over their significant other, it is up to intelligent people to use the law to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 03:55 PM
3

I think it would go down more like.. "What if there were a racially defined floor?" "Then races would be separated..now what are you doing here? Get back to floor 12 like you belong." I don't think the sexist people that created this floor would be particularly accepting to personal attributes such as race.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 09:07 AM
6

You sir, have got a point. And a good one at that.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:27 AM
6

I have been saying that MR has a PR problem for a long time, to no avail. I'm a strong supporter of the things that we discuss here, but we go about it the wrong way. If not the top-voted comment, highly voted comments in most threads go something along the lines of 'sarcasm about how this wouldn't have happened to a woman' or 'x y z fuck feminists'. Sarcasm and insults get us nowhere. Thinking about issues in an equality-based way (what's a solution to problem x that'll provide equalism and jus…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:24 AM
0

Well, failing that, he really should've himself.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:52 AM
2

She only beat them once (according to OP). The affairs though she kept secret.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:27 AM
4

'Almost won full custody', but was (thankfully) awarded none. The thing about the children being better in a foster home is fucking stupid, I agree, but the OP did say this: Thankfully, I was able to thwart the accusations and dismiss all charges (aside from several factors - 0 criminal file for me, her history of mental illnesses, children testifying for me) but guess what? Charges were never pressed against her. WHY DIDN'T HE PRESS CHARGES AGAINST HER. I'm pretty sure that could've severely ch…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:25 AM
1

Why don't you post this to a feminist subreddit or something? I'm sure they'd be outraged.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:15 PM
-10

And once again you miss the point. I'm not a feminist, I believe in equal rights. And it saddens me that Men's Rights isn't taken seriously by a lot of people outside of Men's Rights because half of what we post is "Man got life in prison? He deserves it, not like those guiltless ladies that deserve a $5 fine for the same crime haha!" Sarcastic feminist-hating posts don't get us anywhere. And if you doubt that I am indeed a guy, I've had this account long before I joined MR.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:01 AM
4

Intoxication is no excuse for anything. And he didn't just kick another guy's ass, he fucking ripped out 8 teeth, broke several bones, and caused permanent hearing loss. All this on the word of his crazy girlfriend.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 05:58 AM
-1

Who says that the feminists don't agree that this is fucked up? Cuz I'm pretty sure that they do.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 05:54 AM
3

Just a note: The one in jail is not the accused rapist, but the girl's boyfriend who beat the accused rapist, causing him to lose 8 teeth and permanent hearing. That guy deserves to be in jail, vigilante justice should not be condoned.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:01 AM
-15

As a man, I agree with you entirely, and Men's Rights needs to learn that mindlessly shittalking the other gender and feminists does nothing to help real, important issues.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 01:47 AM
2

From Figure 1.6: "In particular, fathers were the alleged perpetrators in almost one half (46%) of substantiated cases of physical abuse, closely followed by mothers (43%)". While I'm not saying the safekids page is correct, maybe they drew those results from one of their other sources (just speculating, I haven't checked them). Saying 'the study says the opposite' like you did isn't the best way to word it, since the study still says that men are the abusers more than women, just not to as ofte…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:23 AM
1

This is a good example. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n7r3s/california_man_whose_exwife_poured_boiling_water/c36wvpa People joking about how a woman who killed a man is likely going to get a "slap on the wrist with a battered wife syndrome defense". That's obviously not going to happen, she's clearly going to go to jail for a suitable amount of time, hopefully the rest of her life. Making up shit that isn't likely to happen doesn't add to the conversation.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:14 AM
1

That really isn't helping. Can you point me to a specific page or passage in the statcan pdf that talks about child abuse in reference to mothers v. fathers?
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:00 AM
2

I think you might be looking at spousal abuse, while the safekids page is talking about child abuse. That said, I can't find any statistics in the statcan pdf that state whether the male or female parent is the abuser.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:12 PM
1

If you'd come up with something with any substance to add to your disagreement instead of spewing allegations of trolling, I'll gladly read and reply to your point of view.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:41 PM
-1

This is beyond fucking stupid. The same things apply to each gender in almost every situation listed in this pathetic chart.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 10:21 PM
5

Hey, let's not go overboard. If the genders were reversed, the same, logical thing would have likely happened, and the male cop would have been suspended.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 11:28 PM
6

Horrible title, it appears to imply the cop was doing something good. TDLR for those who didn't read the article; An apparently batshit insane female cop was harassing various couples who were kissing/displaying affection in public, and forcing boys to "do sit ups". Glad she's been suspended.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:37 PM
1

If you're being sarcastic it's not particularly adding anything to the post. If you're not..women received lifeboats because of boredom? What?
/r/MensRights23/11/11 03:38 AM
3

In all the examples you mentioned, an identical item is available for only men.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 03:26 AM
3

I didn't mean that. I meant the EXAMPLE was no longer relevant. The idea still is. We just have to evaluate it in our own context.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:40 PM
1

The key part of findler's comment was her own life was in danger. I remember reading an article on this that said she believed her boyfriend was reaching for a gun when she stabbed him. That said, I'm not fully aware of the details of the case, and can't say what she deserved.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:36 PM
4

His point was that this is no longer relevant. Probably also in that issue was "Niggers removed from theatre for trying to sit in white-only section." Like Landeyda said, this isn't necessarily no longer an issue, the 1967 tabloid was just a poor way of illustrating it.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:13 PM
1

No, she seemed quite insane. I'm not sure what her backstory is, but logically, she doesn't want to eradicate males, she wasn't to eradicate the species. That or she has a very poor understanding of biology.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:29 PM
1

I sincerely hope huge shitstorms were brewed over all of these incidents, and any others like them.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:47 AM
0

Sorry, I must've missed that line. While I agree that there's the tendency for underage women to be perceived more of a victim than underage boys, I wouldn't say it's 'automatically assumed' by anyone's standards.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:37 AM
3

Why the downvotes on this guy? We can't just go around saying "this woman got away with this when CLEARLY a man wouldn't have". We can't compare a real situation to a hypothetical, to make a valid analysis we need to know how badly on average women are treated for this crime, and how badly on average men are, then we can compare.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:54 PM
3

Where the hell did you get that quote..'enjoying rape' is an oxymoron in itself.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:53 PM
4

I think most people agree this is retarded, and most people would agree a male version would be equally retarded.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:08 PM
2

I'm still talking from personal experience, but I've been robbed once, and it was non-violent. I know a dozen-odd guys and girls who have also been mugged, sometimes at knife/gunpoint, but never violently. I think if someone's enough of an asshole to steal from someone with the threat of physical violence, they probably couldn't give less of a shit as to if they're hitting a guy or a girl.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 09:54 PM
3

Now that just isn't true. If anything, women are MORE likely to be mugged because of the stereotype that they're the weaker sex. In my personal experience, I know many women who have been mugged more than I have.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:09 AM
1

Are you visibly transgender, or would someone who saw you simply think you were a man? In response to your supposed gender differences.. I'd like to think of myself as a fairly average guy, and I've generally never experienced anything but niceness upon meeting new people. I've been given a 'warning' while driving too, I'd tend to think your case was simply a coincidence. NOW you're afraid of physical violence? Physical violence isn't something I feel anxious about on a day-to day basis, and I d…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:06 AM
2

My 2 cents: If a man of age has consensual sex with with someone aged 15-17, it's a bit of a grey area, but should the the underage woman become pregnant, she should near definitely receive child support. If a woman of age has consensual sex with someone aged 15-17, and becomes pregnant, they probably also deserve child support - I'd say it's situational. But CLEARLY, if an of age man rapes an underage woman (no consent) and impregnates her, she deserves child support. But if an of age woman rap…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 12:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter