TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

johnslegers Archive

View 8 posts and 157 comments by johnslegers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Yesterday, I posted a song called The Illusion of Choice, where this user redditmaxima said this : My most popular song is about girls dumping guys without hesitation (I have other related ones also, my lyrics all) :-) I also have huge library on relations and had closed groups for... girls :-) I'm not entirely sure, but I believe that user is female as well. Or there's eg. Youtuber ShoeOnHead, who is also female, and did some pretty balanced takes on both the male and female dating experiences …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:31 PM
3

We're reached a point in time where we can speak of a male loneliness epidemic. Yes, there's no such thing as a female loneliness epidemic, at least not to the same degree. The reason is because at present most straight men have no dating options anymore, while most straight women do. In my humble opinion, that makes it a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:01 PM
0

All music have those who hate it and those who love it. That includes my music. If you don't like it, there's no need be negative about it. You can just as easily ignore it and move on.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:57 PM
0

I can't speak for the others who post in this subreddit, but I consider myself neither "conservative" nor "progressive". I see it more as "the 1%" versus "the 99%", "normies" versus "neurodivergents", "based" versus "woke", or "the system" versus "the people". My best friend is a 50+-something anti-"woke" bisexual Communist. My late best friend was pretty traditionalist & nationalist but also dropped acid. And you'll find that my songs are a mix of "left" and "right" themes, mixed with my own pe…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:54 PM
-4

Have you ever made anything that sounds remotely this good with the help of an AI? If not, you might want to stop calling other people's work "low effort". You have no idea whatsoever what you're talking about if you think making music like this requires no skill just because I happened to use an AI to make it. My workflow at present consists of 8 different AI tools + OpenShot for the video editing, which allows me to create ever better music at an ever more efficient manner.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:32 PM
3

I'd say this never had anything to do with whether or not you're conservative. The long term effect of Tinder equals so-called brain rot on men and women, regardless of your age or where you position yourself on the political spectrum. It's kinda like heroin. Maybe some people are able to use it responsibly, but for most it's something you want to stay away from because the juice just isn't worth the squeeze.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:26 PM
1

One might argue it's not so much a singular pattern but a cluster of patterns. Either way, I felt this question is important enough to warrant a thread of its own, where I tried to give an overview with bullet points.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:22 PM
1

Men's rights & dating are very much correlated.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:42 PM
3

I know you just copy-pasted this title from Youtube, but the ' ' should go around 'misogyny'.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:27 PM
2

In my article, I try to explain the relevance of the following pattern : In no time, Tinder became thé platform for online dating. And while online dating used to be frowned upon and was something you only did when you didn't know how to meet someone at a pub or disco, now almost everyone remotely interested in dating had an account over there. This means the socially awkward average looking dudes were now in the same arena as the smoking hot jocks, competing for the same women. Now, what most w…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:23 PM
19

Some would argue that "feminism" was explicitly designed to rip the nuclear family apart and thus make the masses more easily controlled by the powers that be. I'm not saying that's what happened. But I'm also not saying it's not.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:12 PM
1

Who? What? Where?
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:10 PM
-7

Just because you can't recognize quality, that doesn't mean others can't.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:07 PM
-10

What makes you think I do only pop? I explore a wide range of genres, from drum-and-bass to hiphop to indie to metal. Some of my songs are pretty formulaic, others are pretty experimental. Some of my song are intended as tongue-in-cheek satire, others are dark and deal with themes like mass murder or suicide. You think I didn't need 43 years of life experience & 3 decades of exploring a wide range of genres to create these? Dream on! Any tool is only as skilled as the person using it.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:02 PM
0

Facebook has existed since 2004. In my experience, online dating remained relatively easy for a nerdy dude like myself until at least about 2010, when I met my ex. Tinder was launched in 2012. When I entered the dating market again in 2020, the dating market felt irreversibly changed. Before Tinder, online dating was by far my prefered option. These days, I'm inclined to try anything but. Anyway, see my article How Tinder Killed Dating for a brief overview of the history of online dating.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:46 PM
-15

You didn't know AI was used to make music? Or why else the lol?
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:39 PM
1

If you like this song, here's some other songs of mine you might like : Tinder Killed Dating The Illusion of Choice Another Night, Another Swipe No Text, No Date Power Shifts The Mirror She Made If Love Was True Stand or Break Fading Idol Primal Urge Parallel Pulse Heartlines Perfect Haunt King of the Game All are variations on the same theme, based on 43 years of life experience, with women as friends, lovers & strangers alike. In the long run, the pattern always seems to be the same.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:25 PM
-13

My songs are often confused for "organic" music and have people who consider them unironically catchy. So, then, where's the horror and what makes it slop?
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:22 PM
6

3rd wave feminism fed women the lie that submitting to an employer's will is a form of emancipation while voluneering for the life of a housewife is equivalent to slavery. And it told them that "monkey branching" is better than "for better or worse" and "until death do us part", because "you deserved better, girl". Tinder took advantage of that and de facto destroyed dating as a concept. FYI, this song is actually based on an article with the same title, where I detail on the evolution of online…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:15 PM
-1

If you like this song, here's some other songs of mine you might like : The Illusion of Choice Another Night, Another Swipe No Text, No Date Power Shifts The Mirror She Made If Love Was True The Man You Swore You’d Be Stand or Break Fading Idol Primal Urge Parallel Pulse Heartlines Perfect Haunt King of the Game All are variations on the same theme, based on 43 years of life experience, with women as friends, lovers & strangers alike. In the long run, the pattern always seems to be the same.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:05 PM
1

If you like this song, here's some other songs of mine you might like : Tinder Killed Dating Another Night, Another Swipe No Text, No Date Power Shifts The Mirror She Made If Love Was True The Man You Swore You’d Be Stand or Break Fading Idol Primal Urge Parallel Pulse Heartlines Perfect Haunt King of the Game All are variations on the same theme, based on 43 years of life experience, with women as friends, lovers & strangers alike. In the long run, the pattern always seems to be the same.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:02 PM
1

If you like this song, here's some other songs of mine you might like : The Illusion of Choice Tinder Killed Dating Another Night, Another Swipe No Text, No Date Power Shifts The Mirror She Made If Love Was True The Man You Swore You’d Be Stand or Break Primal Urge Parallel Pulse Heartlines Perfect Haunt King of the Game All are variations on the same theme, based on 43 years of life experience, with women as friends, lovers & strangers alike. In the long run, the pattern always seems to be the …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:00 PM
1

I mean yeah there are a lot of women who will respect you less if you show any emotion. But do you really want to be in a relationship with such women? That isn’t even remotely healthy. In my experience, it's not so much a matter of showing emotion, but rather of showing weakness. Women are attracted to men they look up to. And, the more weakness you show, the less they're able to look up to you. And, if a woman does not look up to you, she typically looks down on you. This means she'll either "…
/r/ExRedPill09/04/23 09:26 PM
2

No, not all men are potential rapists. No, adult men do not need to be taught to not to rape. Rape is bad. We know. And most of us have no intention whatsoever to experiment with that. If you feel like you might want to rape a woman, please seek a psychologist.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:30 AM
0

Its not his fault. They BOTH had sex. SHE had the baby even though BEFORE and AFTER she had it, she was TOLD that he wanted no part of it, YET she did it anyway. But then there was a baby. And he refused to be a father. This shit causes lots of trauma for the kid involved. I know it's a tired old cliche, but "doesn't anyone think of the children"?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:54 PM
1

My mother? My mother and father stayed together for almost 5 decades until my father died from ALS. What does she have to do with anything said in this comment section?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:52 PM
1

You're not agreeing with the majority and it's sad you think you do. I agree the mother is a ****. I agree she shouldn't have manipulated him. I agree society is biased against men. I agree on pretty much everything. All I'm saying, is that he is selfish too... ​ it's not selfish when you are forced into something you didn't want by someone else's selfish desire. Tell that to the child growing up without a father...
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:59 PM
-1

He has a kid now, though. That kid is a person. Kids need a father. Yes, she is also selfish. Yes, she's a ****. How does that change anything?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:01 PM
-5

WTF are you even talking about? Also, why am I getting downvoted for pretty much agreeing with the general sentiment of this topic, just with a tad more nuance? Oh, right, this is Reddit. Nobody likes nuance on Reddit...
/r/MensRights25/11/22 07:33 PM
134

That's what double standards for men and women are like in the 2020s. As a man, just looking funny at a woman can result in your life getting ruined. As a woman, you can literally prey on vulnerable teen boys and get away with it with a slap on the wrist...
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:50 PM
-17

He's selfish for not caring about the kid he spawned. But it still pales in comparison with all those women who support aborting a fetus when the father wants to keep it... When did blatant hypocrisy become the norm?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:35 PM
1

Every feminist turns into Ben Shapiro when the topic is men. I think you mean Brett Cooper...
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:32 PM
0

If you think my position is not based on merit and argument, you have not nearly done enough reading. See eg. Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West (1926), Julius Evola's Men Among the Ruins (1953), Elaine Morgan's Falling Apart (1976), Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985), John Zerzan's Elements Of Refusal (1988), Sacks & Thiel's The Diversity Myth (1995), Tomislav Sunić's Homo Americanus (2007), Pentti Linkola's Can Life Prevail? (2009), Theodore Kaczynski's Technological Slave…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 11:08 PM
0

Is it, though? Elon Musk recently made pretty much the same argument on Twitter. At what point will we start recognizing that what qualifies as the social norm today is dysfunctional and borderline insane by any reasonable standard? How much longer does Western civilization need to continue to decline before we start taking action?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:07 PM
0

"My views are only those which any educated man prior to the French Revolution would have found sane."— Julius Evola One might argue that the views expressed by StoneToss are only those which any educated man prior to World War 2 would have found sane. This begs the question : who are the real extremists / radicals? And how does one distinguish progress from degeneration?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 04:08 PM
1

Yandex results are the same as ddg I have been comparing both search engines in the past, and I did notice differences between the results of both search engines. They definitely don't seem to use the same filters. ​ they both use Bing's algorithm. They do? I didn't know that! ​ OP is trying to convince us to stop using the best of all the search engines because he thinks they are tying manipulate us by managing the results of each search. Google is slowly but steadily becoming the worst of all …
/r/MensRights19/12/20 03:22 PM
29

They lose mostly fathers & grandfathers, though.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 12:10 PM
10

From Nature : The coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male
/r/MensRights19/12/20 12:08 PM
2

My instructor smiled and said, “Well, you must love our textbooks, then.” I looked at the syllabus and saw Masculinities and The Men and the Boys by Raewyn Connell, both about gender from the perspective of men’s lived experiences. I just thought, Well, shit. ... because the best & most objective source on what it's like to be a man, is a man who hates his own masculinity so much he wants to get rid of his genitals and take on a female identity. Riiiiight...
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:18 AM
2

Try Yandex
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:13 AM
2

ACTUAL feminism is about GENDER EQUALITY. In the West, women achieved gender equality decades ago. 21st century Western Feminism is nothing but Female supremacism & misandry. Gender equality is the very thing Western Feminists are trying to destroy.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:12 AM
2

I must admit I still use Google for most of my searches, but I have been experimenting with using Yandex & DuckDuckGo instead. Depending on the search, either Yandex or DuckDuckGo gives the best results. Yandex throws a bit too often those "Prove you're a human" crap in between your searches, to make it my default search engine at the moment. But I guess DuckDuckGo would be OK...
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:09 AM
-2

Never known any male punk fan to use nailpolish. Then again, I may just be too young for that. I was born in 1981, so by the time I was a teen the punk scene was already way beyond its peak...
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:30 PM
1

Its not feminization of males, its fucking punk rock. Don't you mean "goth"? Or "emo"? To be fair, goth & emo guys don't tend to be the most masculine of guys. Sure, not all are effeminate. But many definitely are. Having said that, I fully support the right of goths or emos to express themselves with black fingernails or lipstick. If that's your thing, go ahead... especially as a teen. We've all went through a goth, emo, punk rock or whatever silly phase when we were teens or tweens, no?!
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:58 PM
56

It seems to me that there is this notion that an erection implies that a man is turned on... and that this in turn implies consent. Of course this is faulty reasoning. And no one would ever dare to imply that a woman getting wet between her legs always implies consent. Also, this ignores the fact that men can and have been analy raped... which requires nothing but force. Unfortunately, we live in an upside world where women believe they are oppressed by men, yet there's countless double standard…
/r/MensRights06/12/20 02:59 PM
1

Every day, the real world looks crazier, and real news articles look more like they come from The Onion...
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:45 PM
2

Literally noone cares about issues that only affects men these days. Yet somehow "Third Wave Feminists" believe we still live in a patriarchy that oppresses women. The cognitive dissonance among these people is very very strong...
/r/MensRights18/11/20 01:34 AM
1

You can literally never win...
/r/MensRights26/06/20 10:46 PM
0

So women....lose interest ...if the man does not fulfill her emotionally, sexually, or practically? If the man does not live up to some arbitrary (and sometime unrealistic) standard ​ That's....how relationships work. I disagree. If you truly love someone, you should accept people's limitations, even if that meets certain needs / wants / desires can't be fulfilled because of it!
/r/MensRights28/05/20 03:58 AM
7

In my experience, yes. Women tend to lose interest in any man who fails to fulfill certain practical, emotional and/or sexual needs. Men may lose interest in a woman when she eg. becomes less attractive by gaining weight or aging, but this is far from universal. But others will love a woman indefinitely, even if certain traits that initially made them fall in love have declined or when that woman fails to fulfill certain needs, if he feels their connection is strong enough to overcome this!
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:08 PM
103

How delusional must you be to think that men have it easier than women on Tinder (or any other form of dating)?
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:45 AM
0

That kid is going to be soooo messed up!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 05:27 PM
1

You sure?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 01:48 AM
1

\ facepalm **
/r/MensRights25/04/20 05:52 PM
6

I can't imagine how much it must suck to be male and single these days... I consider myself lucky I got hitched about a decade ago. Things seem to have gotten progressively worse on the dating scene ever since. And with this lockdown going on in much of the world, you really don't want to be isolated, alone in your own home...
/r/MensRights21/03/20 11:56 PM
1

How do you know?
/r/MensRights06/10/19 09:04 PM
4

Someone else posted this in this threat : I had mine removed later in life due to an accident and it made sex and orgasms about 1/10th as nice as it used to be. So no, the you can't " still feel pleasure and have a normal sex life" the same as other people. Most men just can't tell the difference, because they've lived their entire life either with or without their foreskin. No chance in hell I'm ever going to have mine cut off unless it's absolutely necessary for some medical reason.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:43 PM
16

1/10th? And most Americans actually do this by default? That's just... incredible!
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:39 PM
2

Possible... but not likely!
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:38 PM
1

Given your other comments, particularly about how we're being erased from history and having our statues torn down in the streets, it's pretty obvious you aren't one of them. ????? ​ Bit of help for you: if you find yourself upset because statues of traitorous white supremacists are being removed because the country is deciding not to glorify their treason and hatred any more, you should get some help. The very term "White supremacist" is a racist slur, and stands for nothing other than Whites w…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:02 PM
2

Right, I'm racist and sexist against myself now. Self-hating Whites are a thing. It's commonly referred to as "White guilt". ​ No one is every going too take any of the real issues we face seriously if people like you keep making extremist comparisons in such poor taste. No one is going to do anything about all the anti-White & anti-male propaganda if people keep downplaying it and pretending it doesn't exist. ​ You think people are going to have a nice discussion with us over the real causes of…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 01:01 AM
2

Where do you get your news from? The British Brainwashing Channel?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:22 AM
3

Never once had any issue with being white. Now THAT's what privilege looks like. Many other Whites are not that lucky! "Deaths of despair" are becoming ever more common among Whites, because Whites are becoming ever more disenfranchised in the very countries their forefathers built!
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:47 PM
2

You're just in denial.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:37 PM
2

What kind of Lalaland are you living in to think it's delusional to recognize the institutional racism and sexism directed towards White men throughout the West?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:08 PM
5

This is still hyperbole. ... says the one whose own words are permeated with anti-male, anti-White bias. Saying something like this means that you seem to think there is no basis whatsoever for any of the criticisms of white men, that they are being unfairly scapegoated. Most definitely, yes. Sure, some White men have done bad things in the past... as have some Black men, some Jewish men, some Asian men... or some women. Are you honestly blaming an entire race and/or gender for the things some W…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:05 PM
10

Comparing white men to the treatment of the jews in WW2 is pure hyperbole No one is comparing the treatment of White men to the treatment of Jews in WW2 Nazi Germany. We're comparing the treatment of White men to the treatment of Jews in pre-war Nazi Germany. This was before Jews were sent en mass to concentration camps. This was before there was any mention of an extermination plan whatsoever. This portrayal and treatment of Jews in pre-war Nazi Germany was in fact very similar to the portrayal…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 04:39 PM
3

it is because my grandmother was there at that time, and she told me it was subtle at first and then everyone was afraid to say anything. it went from bullying to outright persecution. Today, public opinion changes a lot faster than it did back then, because we're far more bombarded by all kinds of propaganda than people used to be, even in 1930s Germany. I mean... Consider how rapidly public opinion on topics like gay marriage or transgenders changed over the last couple of decades. Such a rapi…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:50 PM
3

Pretty much, yes. Whether you blame Jews as a race for usury and porn, you blame Whites as a race for genocide and slavery or you blame Blacks as a race for violent crime, you are blaming an entire race for the actions of a segment of that race, and ignoring members of other races that have engaged in similar behavior. Even if that segment is a majority segment, it's still wrong to blame the race as a whole or ignore members of other races that are just as guilty. Yet, blaming Whites as a whole …
/r/MensRights03/10/19 02:20 PM
9

There's a difference between portraying an entire gender and/or race (in this case White men) as inherently evil or between calling out the irrationality & radicalism of modern Feminists. The former is comparable with calling Jews and evil race. The latter is not.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:49 PM
13

Yea, and? The Nixon administration demonized protesters of the war as hippie communists and the Reagan administration the "blacks" as drug addicts or criminals. Those consistently demonize the poor as the dregs of society, leeching off of the hard work of the average man when they're the ones that keep most of what is earned by said man's labor and toils. Today, White men are literally blamed for all evil in the world, from slavery & income inequality to war and genocide. This is far more extrem…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:45 PM
12

while I agree with most of his policies, Donald Trump uses this with his “fake news is the enemy of the people,” thing. He ain't wrong about the American mainstream media, though. Western mainstream media and American mainstream media in particular is notoriously unreliable and biased. It's no wonder that people are increasingly flocking to alternatives like the Rusian channel Russia TV or the Iranian channel PressTV, which - in spite of being state owned - provide more accurate reporting on iss…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:34 PM
16

White men are literally blamed for all that's wrong in the world. They're increasingly portrayed as inherently evil by all Liberal mainstream media, and consistently discriminated in favor of women & non-Whites. The parallel with the way Jews were portrayed in pre-war Nazi Germany is striking, really.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:20 PM
18

White men are literally blamed for all that's wrong in the world. They're increasingly portrayed as inherently evil by all Liberal mainstream media, and consistently discriminated in favor of women & non-Whites. The parallel with the way Jews were portrayed in pre-war Nazi Germany is striking, really.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:19 PM
8

Next article from the WJS : "Study demonstrates that water that falls from the sky in the form of rain is just as wet as the water that comes from your tap." Seriously, though, if this is surprising to anyone, they just haven't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:27 PM
6

I sorta kinda do this all the time... at least online. It just makes a sentence a helluvalot more expressive when you add a word here and there that doesn't really need to be there but adds just that little bit of nuance or modifies the pacing of a sentence just that little bit to make it read more fluently and get the message across just a little bit better. And I guess I also kinda do this to do make my sentences sound just a teenie weenie less formal. No one likes to read a text that reads li…
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:15 PM
1

It's common, though, for people to be able to drive, have sex or do the craziest things while drunk and not remember anything afterwards due to a blackout. Not remembering contenting to sex and not consenting to sex aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 09:57 AM
0

Magically it really only seems to be the places we're at war with that hate it. Not really. Europeans are no more a supporter of American imperialism than Middle-Easterners. ​ Probably because it works, lol. Invading countries, bombing them to shreds and installing a corrupt puppet government that makes people's lives much worse than it was before, is not exactly something I'd consider to be working. ​ Funny how you don't mention the benefits of having the US in NATO NATO is literally nothing bu…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 09:54 AM
2

I’m not the biggest fan of Marxism and left leaning culture and the whole Palestinian conflict/ Iran stuff but I can see why he could be seen as a hero from that side of history. I'm no fan of Marxism either. Nor do I care much for Islam. I do, however, recognize the dangerous influence Zionists have on the Western world at large, and I respect anyone who is not afraid to stand up against them. And much the same, I respect anyone willing to stand up against any authority they disagree with, no m…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:51 PM
33

Ones assuming somone was taken advantage of whilst intoxicated i.e. maybe so drunk they couldnt speak type and the other is assuming they were drunk but gave every indication they wanted to have sex. Unless you actually have evidence that someone was unable to consent (eg. witnesses who saw what was going on), you should never presume rape.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:42 PM
101

How is contenting to sex while drunk any different from stepping into a car while drunk? I mean... not remembering having contented to sex because you were too drunk is not even close to being the same as not consenting to sex.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:39 PM
1

Do you have an example of that? Roger Garaudy, perhaps? During WW2, he fought for the French resistance against the German occupation, resulted in his imprisonment in Algeria, as a prisoner of war of Vichy France. Garaudy taught at two universities and wrote more than 50 books, mainly on political philosophy and Marxism. As a political candidate for the French Communist Party, he succeeded in being elected to the National Assembly) and eventually rose to the position of deputy speaker, and later…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:50 PM
1

Let's just say that real history isn't nearly as black and white as the history books present them. This is especially true for WW2. There's a reason 16 countries in Europe have laws that make it illegal to question certain aspects of that war. Clearly, the powers that be are afraid people might start thinking the good guys actually lost that war if they had access to all the information.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:07 PM
0

unless I see a credible historical source, i'd find that extremally hard to belive. I have no reason to disbelieve this person. In fact, it kind of corroborates what my own grandmother told me, who lived in the other side of Europe. Her parents were forced to house first German, then British soldiers. The way she described the German soldiers, it was like they treated her like a brother would. She didn't want to go into detail on the British soldiers... and I sensed fear in her when she talked a…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:49 AM
-1

Yeah, as a polish person, id disagree. I lived for three months in Zamość, a bit South-East of Lublin. I was invited to the some of a fairly important person over there, who told me in private about how his mother (or was is it grandmother?) lived in absolute fear for the Red Army raping women and plundering the area, but not for the German Army, which was actually delivering food and medicine to people in the area. That sure helped put things in perspective for me.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:40 AM
1

That's why you didn't see too many infantry soldiers at Nuremburg. Nuremberg was nothing but a Soviet style show trial.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:00 AM
-14

Yeah your right that’s way worse than literal death camps and systemic genocide. When 16 countries in Europe have laws that make it illegal to even question that, that should tell you something about how accurate that claim is. Historical facts don't need draconian laws to protect people from questioning them.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:49 AM
1

You're conflating the politicians with the people. I'm not. I never said anything about the American people. Everyone outside of America knows that the American people are just gullible fools brainwashed by either the "conservative" media (like Fox or Infowars) or the "Liberal" media (like CNN or Huffpo) into a very dichotomous perspective on the world at large, with both sides blaming each other for the mess America is in today, while the real culprits stay out of the spotlights. Americans seem…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:28 AM
4

Policemen are also just doing their job and getting paid for it. And while some may be very much engaged in trying to protect you, others are also merely protecting the same oligarchs who send kids to die in the Middle-East against the people they're supposed to protect. The real heroes are not soldiers, nor policemen, nor even firefighters. They're the men and women who are willing to risk their status, their income and/or their freedom for the greater good, and who are doing this because they …
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:18 AM
-17

I wonder how many Europeans would have considered the Americans army invaders rather than liberators if they had had the foresight of envisioning what Europe would become like as a consequence of them winning WW2. The US winning WW2 basically was the end of the beginning of traditional European values and nationalism in Europe, and nearly all of the major problems Europe is facing today are a direct consequence of that. Somehow, everyone speaking German and having to hail a dictator doesn't soun…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:11 AM
5

Speaking of complete bollocks; you are clearly not well-informed. Didn't it seem suspicious to you that Bernie, Hillary, AND Trump were all shitting on the invasion of Iraq in the 2016 debates? It continues to be widely held up as an example of a huge American mistake. Maybe a better assertion would be that Americans don't question bombing campaigns or invasions sufficiently when they start, and only realize the mistake many years after. That's just more PR. During those very debates, they were …
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:57 AM
15

But, since the western powers are primarily in wars of aggression against others for the rich and powerful, yeah, fuck that. Soldiers are just doing their job, a risky one to be sure, but still a job. The German soldiers operating the Concentration camps during WW2 were just doing their job. The Russians soldiers operating Stalin's gulags were just doing their job. Some of the greatest evil is done by people "just doing their job". "I'm just doing my job" is no excuse when you're helping billion…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:49 AM
4

I mean why else do we have military bases all around the world? It's called imperialism. And America is hated for it throughout the world!
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:41 AM
1

To be fair, she is right about soldiers fighting only for the interests of the oligarchy. Wars aren't fought to protect us from evil. They're fought because powerful people want to maintain their power by protecting their resources or increase their power by gaining control of another nation's resources. It you want to serve your country, don't join the army. Start a revolution instead, so we can get rid of these assholes and we can have a "government by the people, for the people" once more.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:39 AM
12

It's pink
/r/MensRights13/09/19 05:18 PM
1

Very, very, véry disturbing!
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:51 PM
7

Cool dad you've got!
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:32 PM
12

Tech is one of the few places where male geeks feel welcome. And Feminists want to take that away from them. Now that's what real intolerance looks like!
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:12 AM
7

Maybe it's time to start identifying as a girl?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:50 PM
8

Coming from a man who once said "When you're white, you don't know what it's like to be poor", statements like these shouldn't be surprising.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:33 AM
1

Because men are evil and only women matter, in the eyes of the establishment.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:39 PM
1

What word would you prefer to describe the situation when people say one thing and then do another? There's many different explanations for why there's a "statistically significant discrepancy between implicit and explicit bias", from contextual differences, to semantic differences, to differences in measurement, none of which involve any dishonesty whatsoever. Exactly the same deal. That is a description of first order correlations. It's a real effect, but not enough to switch men from having a…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 12:44 PM
1

"Lie" (which I put in quotes on purpose) means the statistically significant discrepancy between implicit and explicit bias. "Lie" implies dishonesty. I see no indication of dishonesty here. FALSE. Men had an in-group bias statistically indistinguishable from zero. "In sum, Experiment 2 confirmed that men possess less in-group bias compared with women and supports the hypothesis that emotional conditioning, through developmental events, may influence automatic gender attitudes in two ways. First…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 11:58 AM
1

From the self reports, you see that when you ask people DIRECTLY about their preference, men "lie" and overwhelmingly say they like women better (-0.67). Women "lie" and say that they have no preference (0.06). I'm not convinced the men are lying, when looking at all 4 experiments. The first part of this sentence is WRONG. The paper says no such thing. Experiment 2 suggests that people with a strong bond with their mother (regardless of gender) tend to prefer women over men. Experiment 3 suggest…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 11:16 AM
1

That's from the wiki, which is also WRONG. The paper says no such thing. Actually, it does. In the "general discussion" part at the end of the paper, you find this : "Thus, we can claim with confidence that even when men are responding automatically, their in-group bias is surprisingly frail and that women’s in-group bias is particularly strong at the implicit level (i.e., stronger than men’s by a factor of 4.5)." Basically, what they seem to be saying here, is that men typically don't have auto…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:46 AM
1

What you quoted here in no way implies that men do not have an in-group preference. It says "stronger". Do you understand what "stronger" means? The quote said this : "This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men" I read this as stating that women's bias in favor of women is 4.5x greater than men's bias in favor of women, with with both being biased in favor of women. But yeah, it sure coul…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 08:31 AM
1

you misinterpreted the wiki entry I didn't misinterpret anything. In fact, I couldn't misinterpret anything, because there was no interpretation involved. I quoted part of a Wikipedia article verbatim, without modifications, which clearly, unambiguously states that the study revealed that "men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender." In only one of the four experiments in the paper did men show no bias in favor of other men. Men's in-group bias was WEAKER than w…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:37 PM
20

... which is one of the reasons i posted it here.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:19 PM
1

Equality!
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:40 PM
1

Tell that to Molyneux. I usually just leave whichever title Reddit proposes when I post a link. But yeah, maybe I shouldn't do that in ever case...
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:48 PM
1

Even Google which is a very liberal search engine openly states this when it comes to typing in "Positive medical reasons for Circumcision" Sure, there's some mild benefits that come with circumcision. But it's by no means necessary. A few mild benefits doesn't justify the downsides of genital mutilation. The foreskin actually has a purpose, you know? It's actually there to protect the most sensitive part of the penis, you know?
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:48 PM
1

You do realize if you get a circumcision in modern day it has nothing to do with the religion right? Sure it does. American Jews have popularized circumcision in the US, so Jews are harder to physically distinguish from gentiles. That's the ONLY reason circumcision has become so common in the US. There's no medical reason whatsoever to warrant the genital mutilation of baby boys.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 12:45 PM
1

Still... Circumcision is mutilation. Period. There is no justification whatsoever for mutilating baby boys because some ancient religious text prescribes it...
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:41 AM
16

No man can tell another man who has more sensitivity in their dicks.. Get real. Some people who weren't circumcised at birth get circumcised later in life for medical reasons. They can compare.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:51 PM
20

Just because the mutilation of baby boys is commonly accepted in a supposedly civilized country like the USA, that doesn't mean it's any less a form of involuntary mutilation than the circumcision of baby girls. Forekins do have a purpose, and removing it does have negative effects, such as reducing the sensitivity of the penis.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:28 PM
1

plenty of blanket statements and generalizations that are completely unfair Like what?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:51 PM
1

Because some people just look at dictionary definitions. Maybe it's time to update the dictionary?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:45 PM
1

I am not a feminist, in an egalitarian. I'm neither. Humans are biologically different, both at the group level (race, gender, neurotype, etc.) and at the individual level. Therefore, fairness implies different treatment, both at the group level and at the individual level. If you want the best results for everyone, the worst thing you can to is treat everyone equally and expect the same for or from everyone! I was just saying that calling yourself a feminist doesn’t necessarily mean that you ar…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:13 PM
4

And that's a good thing. Biological biodiversity within and between genders or races is a strength. It is not a weakness. What most people don't seem to get, however, is that "Feminism" & "Multiculturalism" are not about preserving this wonderful diversity but about destroying it. Unfortunately, the usage of terms like "diversity" & "equality" in this context has become so Orwellian the often are used to represent the exact opposite of what they literally mean.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:39 AM
2

Women not only achieved equality in the West, but they've surpassed men in this regard. Currently, women are a privileged class in the West. As a movement intended to achieve equality for women, Feminism has become obsolete in the West. Criticizing Feminism for this, and all the misandry associated, is not the same as "demonizing every Feminist" no more as criticizing Islam and its misogynist views is the same as "demonizing every Muslims". Please learn the difference between criticizing obsolet…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:28 AM
1

The very concept of "toxic masculinity" is based on very distorted notions of masculinity by man-hating Feminists & self-hating men, both of which have major daddy issues, both of which have a LACK of healthy role models in their lives, as a consequence of being raised by women and due to the lack of male teachers and growing up in a broken family or a family with an absent father.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:13 AM
1

Support men or gender equality is incompatible with supporting the sexist movement that is Third Wave Feminism.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:11 AM
2

"Scratch any cynic and you will find a disappointed idealist." — George Carlin Cynicism is the logical outcome of having given too much of a shit and then realizing it's all so fucking pointless... As a misanthrope and former idealist, I wouldn't consider my attitude towards mankind one of hatred, but rather one of dislike, contempt & cynicism.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:07 AM
1

Historically, being a talented artist or philosopher are traits no less associated with masculinity than physical strength. The notion that physical strength is required to be a "real man" is a pretty recent notion, based on a misrepresentation of manliness that is spread by man-hating women & self-hating men who never grew up without a healthy male role model!
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:02 AM
2

Feminism is highly toxic. I would, however, argue that Feminism & Femininity are diametrical opposite. And much the same way, one can argue that the traits refered to as "toxic masculinity" are actually opposite to the traits traditionally associated with manhood!
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:58 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is when masculinity is taken too far to the point when men hide their emotions and become secretly depressed. Men become depressed because they live in a Feminized society where there's little room for manliness. Men become depressed because they never had any male role models and they've been raised almost entirely by women. Men become depressed because they have no one aroud to teach them what it means to be a man, so they based it instead on very distorted, negative stereoty…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:54 AM
1

Third Wave Feminists want anything but equality. They want women to have special privileges, they want men to become second rate citizens and they treat manliness as something pathological. If you want equality between the sexes, you should NOT be a Feminist but an anti-Feminist!
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:46 AM
1

You think “negative masculinity” exists??? No, "negative masculinity" does not exist. Negative stereotypes of masculinity exist, however. And the misrepresentation and pathologization of manliness are two of the reasons these stereotypes are negative. Anyway, is that really all you got out of that very lengthy comment I just spent quite some time writing?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:34 AM
1

If you’ve somehow lived a life that encourages men to embrace their emotions and explore the lives they want, regardless of their ability to provide or be tough or to be strong in leadership skills and hands on activities...great. You’ve lead a life of privilege most do not know and never will. Well, that's the problem. Many men suffer from a lack of healthy masculine role models. They never learnt what it's like to be a men because they come from broken families or families with absent fathers.…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:25 AM
1

I’m seriously asking. Did you do well in school? High school & elementary school were pretty easy for me. And I was actually kind of a math whizz. Back in those days, I was the first in my high school to go to the second round of the math olympiads twice in a row. Currently, I do R&D for a high tech software company. I’m fascinated at the lengths you’re going to purposefully not understand what I’m saying in an attempt to prove me “wrong”. You're simply not making any sense. Seems to be complete…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 11:14 PM
1

Too much of the wrong food will kill you. Too much of ANY food will kill you. Too much water will kill you. The problem is neither the food nor the water, but your body having constraints. Toxic food is bad. Food is fine. WTF is "toxic food"? See how those things are different? You're comparing apples with oranges. There's no such things as "too much masculinity". Or do you think I hate ALL food?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:24 PM
0

No one has said masculinity is the problem. So did say that masculinity is the problem by defining the problem as a subset of masculinity or an extreme form of masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:53 PM
0

because the word toxic precedes it as a descriptor of a specific subset of perceived (by the actor) masculine traits That's where you wrong. It isn't a subset of perceived masculine traits. It doesn't have anything to do with masculinity. And linking it to masculinity is what makes the the term "toxic masculinity" sexist, as it falsely correlates certain toxic behavior with masculinity. It's no different from using a term like "toxic Jewishness" to refer to eg. kvetching among Jews or a term lik…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:52 PM
2

Well you’re just arguing semantics at this point and diluting the message. Not quite. Would you use a term like "toxic Blackness" to refer to criminal behavior among Blacks? Would you use a term like "toxic Jewishness" to refer to Jews kvetching? If you're answer is no to both of these, then why use a term like "toxic masculinity", which itself is a very toxic term? Behavior that is toxic because of an exaggerated view of what it means to be masculine This is where you're wrong. Masculinity come…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:49 PM
11

You’re stating your (ill educated) opinion as fact, toxic masculinity exists and it is not sexist. Toxic behavior exists among men. It just doesn't have anything to do with masculinity and the exact same behavior (eg. aggression or dominance) can be found among women as well. This is why the term "toxic masculity" is a sexist term and should be avoided. Only an insecure person who believes their toxic traits are valuable would be offended by this term. I'm not saying that toxic behavior does not…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 06:12 PM
5

Masculinity and Femininity are not exclusively a gender thing either. Wikipedia defines gender as "the range of characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and femininity." So Masculinity and Femininity are "gender things" by definition. Toxic masculinity can’t absolutely be displayed by women and should also be shut down. "Toxic masculinity" is a sexist concept that falsely links certain negative behavioral traits that are common in both genders to masculinity. While…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:51 PM
37

Toxic behavior is mostly a cultural thing, not a gender thing. It's as common in women as in men, if not more. And it's especially common in Feminists, regardless of whether they're men or women!
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:32 AM
2

Is it? How would you define what's a "normal" man anyway? Or a "normal" woman? Who's setting the norms?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 09:58 PM
7

Most male first sexual encounters? Not so sure about that... Sure, sexual assault is probably a lot more common than most people assume, but I very much doubt the majority of either men or women experienced actual sexual assault... either as an adult or during childhood.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:36 PM
1

If they didn't choose to be pregnant, then it's not a choice. They chose to have sex. That means they chose to accept the risk of getting pregnant. If you can't deal with that risk, you shouldn't be having sex. Period!
/r/MensRights18/03/19 11:23 AM
1

Most women know whether they want children, and for most part made up their mind before their first pregnancy test comes back positive, and even then, a lot more make up their mind within 1-2 weeks of that test. Any abortions that do happen later than 20 weeks, are done so again, in the vast majority of cases to save life of the mother So, why not make abortion legal only within the first two weeks, then? And make exceptions only when necessary to save a woman's life? Because why does anyone not…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 10:28 AM
2

The earliest premature baby to survive was delivered at 21 weeks. So, does that mean that you support abortion up to 21 weeks? And why not 20 weeks? Why not 19 weeks? How is any such a limit not completely arbitrary? And how does being unable to survive outside the mother's body make it any less a living being that deserves a chance to survive?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:53 AM
1

There is no line to separate a foetus from an infant. Life does not start a birth. It starts at conception!
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:16 AM
1

Legalizing the murder of infants doesn't primarily affect women. It primarily affects the infants that end up getting murdered!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:48 PM
0

Her argument is equally insane, whether or not she is for control of male bodies.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 02:14 PM
0

Abortion is about the right to live for the infant growing inside a woman's body. Feminists consider murdering infants a human right... in the name of the "right to control their own bodies". And most American Feminists also consider it a right to mutilate the genitals of their newborn sons... as the total hypocrites they are! Men don't need the right to control their own bodies, I suppose... But even if Cher wouldn't support the genital mutilation of boy newborn boys, the comparison with aborti…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:55 PM
2

I suppose that in the eyes of a crazy Feminist the "right" to murder an infant is equivalent to the right to determine whether you circumcise your penis or whether to take testosterone.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:34 AM
5

It's literally the whole point of her tweet that women dictating all these things for men would be absurd. It suppose she's comparing men questioning the "right" of women to murder unborn infants with women being entitled to mutilate men's bodies. That comparison makes no sense, no matter how you look at it!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:32 AM
7

It's literally the whole point of her tweet that women dictating all these things for men would be absurd. It suppose she's comparing men questioning the "right" of women to murder unborn infants with women being entitled to mutilate men's bodies. That comparison makes no sense, no matter how you look at it!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:28 AM
1

It suppose she's comparing men questioning the "right" of women to murder unborn infants with women being entitled to mutilate men's bodies. That comparison makes no sense, no matter how you look at it!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:17 AM
2

medical procedure (abortion) Murdering unborn infants is just a "medical prodecure" now?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:04 AM
1

I read her post. The ALL CAPS and emojis just spell out "full retard". And the actual content is no less batshit crazy than claims I've seen verified Feminists actually make. So I really don't see what makes you so sure that that tweet is supposed to be ironic when the ALL CAPS and emojis suggest she's just that retarded!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:54 AM
1

It suppose she's comparing men questioning the "right" of women to murder unborn infants with women being entitled to mutilate men's bodies. That comparison makes no sense, no matter how you look at it!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:48 AM
0

Is it? What makes you so sure? How can you tell the difference?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:46 AM
0

It suppose she's comparing men questioning the "right" of women to murder unborn infants with women being entitled to mutilate men's bodies. That comparison makes no sense, no matter how you look at it!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:45 AM
0

The world is so full with batshit crazy Feminists these days, I find it anything but obvious to figure out what they mean...
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:45 AM
1

It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general. The reality is that women have entered some STEM fields to the point where they are no longer underrepresented (e.g., biology) while largely forsaking other STEM fields (e.g., computer science). Today, more women than ever major in so-called STEM fields. More than 58% of all bachelor’s, master’s and doctorates in biology are being awarded to women.Within certain University biology departments, wome…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 10:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter