TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jojo2k Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by jojo2k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

incel virgin depressed obsessed If you have nothing to say, you should stop throwing a few picked-up words around and embarrassing yourself in public, if I may give you this tip.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:26 PM
5

anti-semitism now, that's a rapid change of the topic. You showed you don't watch the video, you don't care about any of the studies I linked, you try to make absurd accusations and you're insulting me as a hypocrite without even explaining why. Is that your way to argue? At this point the only dick I care about is my own and how I can put it into a mouth or a vagina. Stick with this, because discussing isn't your strength.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:11 PM
4

Someone who has problems with smegma has also problems with stinky armpits, the solution is easy, just take a shower more often than once a week. My point still stands, you should be able to opt out of circumcising your kid Of course, that's my point of view as well. In fact, I'd outlaw this 'procedure' completely if there isn't medical need, like several countries already did.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:01 PM
5

Have you seen the video? It's shows pretty much why it's mutilation. You can't tell me it's normal to tie down a newborn and slit open his penis with a scissor. You should ask those who advocate for circumcision why they're so interested in another's man wang. isn't that big of a deal Then having one isn't a big deal, either. Besides, you can't claim this if you've never had one.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:52 PM
2

If someone decides for himself he wants a circumcision after doing some research, he can contact a doctor. But newborns can't consent when their badly informed parents think it's a good idea to mutilate him. Hope this answers the question, I'm not sure if I got what you wanted to say.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:41 PM
3

Neither religion (except for jews and muslims) nor atheism nor science delivers any reason why newborns should undergo this amputation.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:37 PM
1

The study I linked in another comment says the death rate is at least 9.01/100,000 which is twice as high as the murder rate in the US. I don't know the absolute numbers of deaths because of school shootings, but it seems absolutely possible.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:32 PM
3

Commentary: Benefits extend into adulthood, says Johns Hopkins adolescent medicine specialist First, it's a commentary, a personal opinion. I stated scientific studies, you won't change my mind with a commentary from 2012.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:12 AM
2

Some additional info would be useful. What do you want to express with this link?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:09 AM
4

English isn't my first language, if you aim for that - I'm sure you still got what I wanted to say. In fact, I said the claimed benefits could be of financial nature. Apart from that, the hospitals seek to make profit, and every unnecessary surgery is a profit, especially if you can sell the body parts that have been chopped off.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:54 AM
7

number yeah, maximal death number. They know for sure how many babies died at least, they don't know for sure how many babies died without being recorded as a death because of circumcision. That's why the number is uncertain.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:48 AM
7

I don't know Mayo clinic, but the benefits could be of financial nature: https://m.imgur.com/a/bWjSSUH Besides, this thread is packed with scientific studies that claim the opposite, so maybe you shouldn't focus on a single statement of Mayo clinic but have a look at the whole image.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:36 AM
7

Uncertain with regard to what? The maximum death rate, not the minimal.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:27 AM
5

No, I can't tell you any benefits of circumcision. But I can tell you a lot of downsides of circumcision, in fact I already did (you would know if you'd bother to read the thread before replying).
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:09 AM
3

Neither does the boy in the video.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:03 AM
2

Did I hurt your feelings? I'm sorry. But I don't want you to tell me stories of your family that might be true or false, I want you to show me scientific evidence or some logical conclusions why circumcisions should be preferable. Now, did you watch the video? Do you agree at least that it is an men's right issue? If not, on which scientific or logical argument do you base your answer?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:02 AM
6

...that's why we have to throw it into the trash until we know it to the fifth decimal place, right? What we know with certainty is the minimum number of deaths. The real number could be much higher, but not lower. Just think a second about this.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:57 AM
4

Did you watch the video or at least the exerpt (13 seconds, https://webm.red/x5W0)? Because I'll call everyone, especially females, who claim it was just a "cut" (you clearly see half of his penis is slit open) but doesn't want to watch a six-minute-video, though, a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:51 AM
7

The study I linked doesn't care about what you think. https://m.imgur.com/a/Nj5kAen
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:45 AM
7

The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/798.abstract Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence http://www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf There is no case for the widespread implementation of circumcision as a preventative measure to stop transmission of AIDS/HIV http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00761.x/full I doubt that any procedure that has twice the death rate…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:43 AM
7

It's mindblowing, if one takes a second to think about this. A death rate of 9.01 is nearly ten times higher than in some western european countries. And the ratio of heavily injured/ deaths is probably much higher with circumcisions than 'normal crime', because the victim is already in hospital, has doctors around, and because the penis is an exposed part of the body, any injuries there will less likely be deadly, you'll have a higher probability to survive, but you might lose your penis, still…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:28 AM
7

Some additional infos: There is simply no defense for circumcision and it needs to be completely illegal if done for anything other than a legitimate medical reason. The foreskin has more nerve endings than a clit does and is packed with dendritic cells that absorb particles around them to identify and present any threat to the immune system which lowers your risk of an STD. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033703/ Circumcision d…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:15 AM
12

got this: https://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html which links to this study: https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/boyhood-studies/4/1/bhs040106.xml "This study finds that approximately 117 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes." So it seems the death rate isn't 5/100,000 but nearly twice as high.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:07 AM
9

Indeed. As far as I know, for example Sweden already outlawed it. Keep in mind, unlike in this videos, most times no anesthetics are used (which don't really help, though). It's not just extremely painful during the amputation, but damages stay forever. "the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery": https://m.imgur.com/a/Nj5kAen
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter