TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jojotmagnifficent Archive

View 0 posts and 750 comments by jojotmagnifficent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Because that authority can be used as leverage (i.e. suck my dick or your fired/fail the class), but it's just as often a situation of vulnerability, i.e. your doctor can't tell you what to do, but he can take advantage of your thankfulness for having made you not die. It's considered improper because it's difficult to impossible to prove that the relationship wasn't forged by abusive/dishonest/manipulative methods. It's not that it's inherently wrong, it's just that it easily could be without a…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 05:12 AM
1

Sorry, you are correct. They abolished the "right to peremptory challenge" and instead implemented the "right of stand-by", which is the exact same thing except it is "encouraged to exercise it sparingly" and it only applies for prosecution v. the crown. But given that those are typically the majority of court cases with Juries anyway, it's basically the same situation.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:07 AM
3

This is the UK. Your options for getting out of it are far more limited. Escaping jury duty is the easiest thing in the world. You show up on the first day and put on airs that you are the most likely person in the world to find the defendant guilty. Then if you even get called up you will be immediately dismissed by the defense. Defendant a minority? Wear a MAGA hat or a "Brexit FTW" shirt or whatever. White guy on trial for a blue-collar crime? Come in with piercings, tats and blue hair. Boom,…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:09 AM
3

polling random (hopefully) people and asking (and hoping the answer is truthful), then extrapolating from their sampling.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:25 AM
1

you have to plate your toilets with gold instead of platinum, how tough... ;( You should be plating them with silver, it has anti-microbial properties and is much healthier.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:55 AM
13

This does not belong in a video game. Why not? It's basically the videogame equivalent of a clockwork orange, a very famous and well respected book and film which had a very similar scene even. And besides, it's not even what you probably think it is, the scene depicted is the filming of a porno, not a rape. Before anything happens the direct yells cut and gives instructions for a retake.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:40 AM
1

what kind of man calls the police The kind that doesn't want to end up stabbed in their sleep by a psychotic woman? Ask her what kind of nutter attacks someone in a jealous rage over something that never even happened. Then teller her to pay her own damn bail and lawyers fees immediately after you apply for a restraining order. You could have been balls deep in another woman and her sister at the same time when she caught you red handed in the act and physically assaulting you STILL would have b…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:33 AM
1

I'm impressed you managed to draw it out that long still, I think I spent like 5 mins just trying to make coffee in game (which I'm pretty sure you can't do). Mostly because I was fairly bored by the game.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 08:10 AM
1

Agreed. Especially on the need for surgery. Kroc had A LOT of facial reconstruction to look like that. Also, it sounds kind of rough to say it out loud, but I honestly don't think it's worth putting much effort into catering for. The fraction of trans people is already tiny, the fraction of those that are into athletics is probably also quite small (assuming it's in line with the general population) and the number of THOSE that are actually at a high enough level for it to matter (i.e. national/…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:18 AM
8

Dunno about UFC etc., but in the olympics I'm pretty sure trans athletes have to be 2 years post op minimum, which means no balls and technically less test available than a natural woman (because also no ovaries, which produce very small amounts of test). Having said that, I also think the whole "no bone density/muscle mass etc. advantage" line they feed is bullshit. I can't see Janae Kroc hitting <135 lbs any time soon without some SERIOUSLY unhealthy dieting.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:31 AM
1

An Hour and a half? I finished it in ~44 mins according to steam, and that includes faffing around in the menu trying to fix the god awful mouse input. It was honestly only a few months ago and and I've already forgot what it was about. Something about "young girl discovers shes a lesbian, goes through a rebellious teenage phase and then her girlfreind dumps her and goes to join the military or something". There was some vague background stuff about the house belonging to cultists before then, b…
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:02 AM
1

Politicians are a bunch of overgrown children, what did you expect? Also, was that an MP recording a fight on his cellphone I saw? No wonder the world is fucked when it's these monkeys running it.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:29 PM
1

Again though, it's not the movie causing rape hysteria, it's hysterical nutjobs not being able to tell reality from fantasy. Movies don't perpetuate rape culture, peoples inability to parse fantasy from reality does.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:15 AM
1

My issue isn't that you are acknowledging it happens, my problem is the miss-attribution of what the problem is. You said the media makes people do these things, it does not. Being stupid makes people do these things. The media does not affect these people, their inability to be rational does. It's like saying guns are to blame for gun violence. Guns are not to blame, the people pulling the triggers are.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:52 AM
1

Not everyone is playing with a full deck of cards, Exactly and it is silly to believe this stuff Exactly , but it has real consequences. I agree. These people really go to a doctor for drugs they don't need. It has become their reality. I fully agree. These people are insane and/or complete morons. That is not the fault of the media though, that is the fault of their lack of mental faculties and more often than not complete unwillingness to rectify that issue (hell, it's usually intentional, peo…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 07:55 AM
1

why else would so many love to tell everyone about that "creeper" at the gym (seriously, read rant wednesdays on /r/fitness, theres a bunch every single week that are tenuous claims at best), or rants from cospalyers or anything else about cons, or feminist comments in general, or try explaining the popularity of twilight and 50 shades (two of the objectively worst books ever sold and yet two of the best selling...). It's basically a humblebrag to them.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:27 AM
1

Yes, but that is because those people are retarded and made stupid decisions, not because movies have magical mind altering powers. If watching poltergeist made you want to worship satan then clearly you are a fucking idiot. The scary thing here is that we let people this stupid vote and give it equal weight to people capable of actual reasoned thought. There's no doubt that movies affect people's reality No, reality is exactly that, reality. It doesn't matter what you think of it, it's state is…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:35 AM
0

I doubt many actually want to be raped, but it wouldn't surprise me to learn many of them would enjoy the idea that they are so insanely hot they literally drive men insane and into uncontrollable rapefits (so long as it never actually happens).
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:09 PM
1

people's realities are affected by what they see in films Only insofar as they have now watched a movie they hadn't before so they know what is in it now. Movies don't make people think stupid things, being stupid does. The movie did nothing wrong, just the watcher who then drew stupid conclusions from the information it presented (like that it in any way reflected reality when it is clearly a work of fiction).
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:06 PM
3

It's a re-write of a page from the webcomic Sinfest. It's actually a sad story, it used to be a really good strip poking fun at the outrageous sterotypes of the worst kind of people. Somewhere along the line though the author went off his rocker, decided his ridiculous caricatures were ACTUAL representations of how men are and women are viewed and as a result devoted everything to pissing on the male characters and "empowering" the female characters while virtue signaling every second word. Peop…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:39 AM
1

Nah, they looked pretty god to me. What you are seeing was her legs moving to counterbalance her center of gravity, specifically STOPPING her swinging all over the place each rep. She might have had a tiny kip on a few of them, but they were pretty decent. Definitely not crossfit level flailing about.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:54 AM
1

I'm pretty sure in most western countries it's only actually illegal if you make the threat with intent. If you just randomly say, "ima kill dat bitch" or something then nobody cares because it's just a dumb person saying a dumb thing, it's meaningless. To successfully have you tried for a crime they would have to prove you did in fact intend to murder them.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:48 AM
1

Weight loading on the bar isn't an issue, both men and womens can handle WAY more than either will ever be lifting. The womens can't take the same loading in terms of physical size of discs however, and tbh that is an oversight on the IWF's part as if you had all the change plates on it as well you would start hitting capacity around the current womens WR due to it's shorter sleeves (unless you had thinner plates). Bar weight is also included in the total.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:08 AM
10

Mens Olympic weightlifting Bars are 20kg vs 15 for women as well, although to be fair that is much more because women are smaller on average, so they need thinner bars to be able to grab them properly with smaller hands and shorter bars to prevent them from whipping so much they practically jerk themselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:09 AM
1

I can bet there are fewer girls who do that, now that Im in college. I work in a place that's mostly 40+ yo women (yay education sector), doesn't seem to have changed that much. The problem arises when some men are just don't have anyone they feel they can share their problems with In a normal healthy society they shouldn't be getting to that point in the first place. Even if they have someone willing to listen A lot of the time what can you even tell them? I know it sucks but it's the way the c…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:53 PM
3

Apart from the fact Milo is gay and he was told he wasn't allowed to? Just stuff like this and this. It's still somewhat fringe at the moment I think, but if recent trends in retardation are anything to go by I can only see it getting worse.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:54 AM
5

Did you not get the memo? If the gay man is white his gayness doesn't count any more. There has even been talking of excluding gays all together from any of the oppression clubs because their being men outweighs the gayness too.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:44 AM
0

It might be because I am a very introverted person, but I feel this is common with men. I would argue it's more symptomatic of the fact most people are simply assholes and not worth trusting with that kind of stuff. Just look at how talking about feelings works out for chicks, they are all catty and bitching about each other behind their backs using "dirt" as leverage etc., it's not safe to open up to them and I would argue women are silly for doing it as freely. It all just ends up in them begi…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:28 AM
17

Fuck this show is terrible, the moderator doesn't moderate, nobody gets long enough to make a point (except the women occasioanlly when it fits the narrative) and most of the women don't even talk about the topic, they just rip on men in unrelated ways. I mean... men commit suicide because they get tough to beat up women and thus we need to teach them not to be violent? That's not even remotely logically coherent. Men are under attack because we need to stop talking about men being under attack …
/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:47 AM
6

I wonder if she is aware she also has that privilege (I mean, she must, right? She was literally doing the same thing without repercussion...), as does the "woman of color" and everyone else there... It's almost like it's a legally enshrined RIGHT that everyone has...
/r/MensRights19/03/16 10:57 PM
6

Well, given your the only man and she has singled you out as being the one causing "drama", it's probably beyond handling discreetly. Is she THE boss, or just YOUR boss? If the latter, lay a complaint with her boss that you are being belittled in front of your co-workers and singled out because of your gender. If your 'murican feel free to add that you are feeling unsafe in your workplace and that if it continues you will be forced to sue. At the very least start looking for other work. But its …
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:59 AM
3

Men are taught to play the odds by buying women drinks, striking up random conversations on the subway, and disseminating pickup lines like they’re spraying pesticides. Hah, sure cupcake, men are "taught" they need to just throw out random shit at women and see what sticks. It's totally not because women almost never make the first move and men quickly learn that doing it is such a crap shoot it's barely even worth putting any effort in. Women are socialized to field and assess incoming advances…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:43 AM
1

I'm not talking about going on it permanently, just while job hunting. I dunno what it's like over there, but here in NZ you quite often have to meet with WINZ (our version of CL) officers to fill them in on what jobs you have applied for etc. while you are on the benny. Even if you are only on it for a couple of months while you are looking, they WILL take notice if you tell them you got turned down for multiple positions because you were white. If large numbers of people are taking hundreds if…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:40 AM
1

Sounds like it's time for a visit to CenterLink (pretty sure that's where you guys get the dole). Once the govt is literally paying for preventing you from getting a job then all of a sudden they will want to fix it.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:23 AM
1

She was talking about the other guy (the one who took the video your pic is from). The other guy was ages away getting trampled by a stampede of retardation by the time Click was involved with anything.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:41 PM
2

I have had a woman kick me in the shin saying that I should not hold the door open for her I hope you had her charged with assault.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:01 PM
2

She said "I can open my own door, you know" and stood there until I let her take the weight of the door. You should have sarcastically offered her a medal for her door opening prowess. Then told her not to be a bitch when someone tries to be polite to her next time.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:49 PM
3

Link to the study for those interested. Honestly, it all sounds pretty retarded to me but without their raw data it's pretty hard to refute (not because the argument is compelling, just that it's not strictly disprovable), at least I couldn't see anything obvious from my brief non-committal glance over it. It flies directly in the face of all ebay interactions I have ever observed though. I've never seen or heard anyone even looking at the persons uesrname, just feedback and price. The idea that…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:46 PM
3

Brought to you by a group of underpaid Indian men on H1B's
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:28 PM
2

Maybe they are just all super oppressed alcoholic-kin who HAVE to order a dozen bottles of wine per night. Check your sober-privilege shitlord!
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:28 PM
3

If you are friends with the kind of retard that would use this app (other than for the lulz with the results to be ignored and the bill split reasonably) then you are more than likely also equally retarded and enjoy this kind of stupid self flagellation. Either that or you are smart enough to give yourself a massive list of "oppressed" statuses in the system and enjoy near free entertainment/dining while your retard friends pay for it all.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:19 PM
1

Abs and forearms and calves are FUCKING INSANELY HARD to get and maintain Abs aren't so hard to maintain and getting there isn't hard either, it just takes patience and a decent amount of time (depending on how far gone you are to start). Calves... some people just have awful insertions and will never look like they have big calves, it's sadly true. Be fat for a prolonged period of time though and chances are good you'll get some glorious fatty calves (or just get a weight vest to save your heal…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:05 AM
1

I would have just responded with "I'm glad you noticed I think your significantly intellectually stunted. Perhaps you should be more concerned about why I think that of you than you are with my penis."
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:30 AM
1

Quite possibly, looks pretty classy.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:46 AM
1

Fair enough. I guess what made me think of buckethead is the anti-fame sentiment. It's why he wears the mask/bucket and why he conducts interviews via zombie head puppet. He basically does everything he can to avoid the spotlight. Him playing for Guns n Roses was really odd, although it also didn't last long.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:58 AM
2

Eric Idle in a dress. Graham Chapman and John Cleese also did a passable job.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 07:54 AM
3

He's just one of of those I hate fame and I'm gonna be one of the greatest but super weird about it and not perform all like that or give the masses what they want. I dunno this Jay Electronica person, but I'm having a real hard time picturing him fitting your description better than Buckethead. Playing for GnR is the most mainstream thing he ever did and it didn't last long. He also auditioned for Ozzy once but Ozzy said no because he refused to take off the mask. His normal process for solo gi…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 07:48 AM
1

Actually... I think she just said she would remove selective service, just in a really non-committal, roundabout way. That's about as good as you are likely to get from a politician.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:47 PM
4

I found out about this place because someone "accused" me of being an MRA. Never heard the term before then, was confused why it was such a bad thing when I came here and it was full of posts from guys losing their families and getting buttfucked by horrendously lopsided laws etc. This was on /r/gaming, I just pointed out how utterly retarded Anita Sarkeesian was and how her entire argument relied on baseless suppositions. Then I got told that I wasn't allowed to criticize critical discourse bec…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:22 PM
1

What have you to be realizing is that these people are oppressing themselves at this point No Kidding. They have literally constructed definitions for everything which mean they can never NOT be oppressed. Their entire academia is based on tautology claiming they are oppressed because they define themselves as being oppressed "by the inherent power structures" or whatever. Just like they claim you can't be racist/sexist to white men because they redefine racism/sexist as being reliant on power (…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:01 PM
1

You're right, it was probably other sects upon closer inspection. Looks like Catholics don't require circumcision, although I can't find any record of them condemning it either, just that they consider it superseded by baptism. Either way I would guess Islam is probably BY FAR most responsible for the practice in Africa. Foreign Religious intervention has left Africa a pretty fucked up place in a lot of ways.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:36 AM
2

But it's feminist ideology that has led to roving gangs capturing men and mutilating their penises against their will in Africa. I'm not sure I believe that. I would think The Catholic Church and especially Islam have had WAY more to do with it.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:11 PM
1

Demonstrates institutionalized misandry. It demonstrates Winny has a sense of humor (which is about his only saving grace). You could probably do the woman for low level assault but I doubt Joyce would bother, you can clearly tell from the stills that even he thought it was funny as the dildo was flying towards his face. He could have her jailed for 10 days or whatever if he wanted (and just because they didn't say it happened doesn't mean it hasn't, but the only difference here between what hap…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:08 PM
1

INAL or anything but: 1/ File a complain of misconduct against the police officer. You didn't do anything wrong, there is 0 evidence you did anything wrong, they have no reason to treat you like that. It's unprofessional and antithetical to the moral obligations of their position. 2/ Depending on context (you didn't provide much) I would file charges against the car that hit you. Doesn't matter if no damage was caused, bad driving is bad driving. 3/ Make an official complaint of harassment again…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:20 AM
1

Honestly, every time I watch that video all I can think is that the behavior of those children is nauseating. I don't understand how "moderate feminists" can't see how sick these people are, and how numerous and influential. The only conclusion I can draw is that there are only two kinds of feminst, the insane asshats like in this video and the kind who say "oh yea, I'm a feminist" because they think that makes them cool and progressive (then they go back to their coffee and never think about fe…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:05 AM
1

That's the one I was thinking of. I liked TL;DR's the most personally, but that was mostly cause I just like his delivery style. They were all extremely similar though.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:06 AM
1

It's funny, but I swear every address video I've seen (TAA, Thunderf00t, TL;DR, some girl whose name I forget but has something to do with shoes) have all basically give the EXACT same responses to each of these questions, to the point where it seems they are reading off the same script. It's actually a little creepy (or maybe they are just going for the low hanging fruit of the simple and obvious retorts). For example, they all answer the trump question with "how does it feel to be the same gen…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:36 AM
2

Was anyone else thinking of this dude That would be Baron Samedi? Similar, but not quite the same. He's prominent deity (I think, maybe just a personification of a natural force or something) in Voodoo lore for those wondering.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:36 AM
1

As in the character from Frozen? There is literally nothing that Mattel can do to stop that, Frozen is a hype juggernaut for pre-pubecent girls and nothing will stop that. Well, I guess they could secure the licensing rights to produce the toys for Disney, although I doubt they could pull that off as Disney has invested a bunch in it's own toy manufacturing recently. They can play the racist angle all they want, but at the end of the day some 5 year old girl isn't going to give a fuck and if mum…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:19 AM
2

Ya know the stupidest thing about this whole barbie debacle? The Barbie line has had dolls of various ethnicities for a LONG time (like 50 years kind of long). It's pretty much always been diverse. Having a "Fat" doll and a "badly dyed hair" doll are really the only new things (hell, they might have even had a "punk rocker" barbie int he 80's with the died hair for all I know). This whole thing is just a desperate attempt from Mattel to rescue the failing toy line, despite the fact the only peop…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 12:17 AM
8

I disagree, using your opponents own arguments by taking them to their logical extremes and doing stupid shit with it is one of the best ways of proving someones argument is retarded. You just let them tear down their own argument while they argue how retarded "your" argument is.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:59 PM
2

When you account for every variable, including issues such as the risk of harm while at the job, then women make more than men for equal jobs with equal experience. I think it's not always, only in certain demographics like umarried women under 30 etc. It's also work considering we quite possibly aren't controlling for EVERY variable, just the ones we have thought of.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:56 PM
5

He has the most hilariously condescending voice ever. I'm not a fan of when he does the silly voice, but his general cadence and delivery is perfect for the videos he does.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:44 PM
1

I'm not saying it's a good thing or that it's not sexist, I'm just saying it isn't their INTENTION to be sexist. IMO that makes a big difference.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 05:56 AM
3

Those seem to have WAY less people in them than the trades in general. There is also way more chicks into cars and woodwork over here than there are men interested in washing the asses of the elderly/disabled.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:03 AM
6

Working in the same sector and country... this is probably more a desperate attempt to increase enrolments, and thus funding, than anything else. The polytechs in NZ are all shit poor right now from what I've been hearing. They are probably mainly trying to pump students into courses they otherwise wouldn't have considered.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:33 AM
1

Koei Temco I believe. There have been other examples too recently from memory, also Japanese companies. They are quite insular a country so they only know what they see in gaming media, so now they all seem to think we are a bunch of prudish SJW's.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:52 PM
2

Or they don't think a market is actually there Any company of decent size will conduct thorough market research. They have well researched statistics indicating the market is not worth pursuing, or they would. Just look at all the shovelware petz and horsez and shit that ubisoft used to push, or HER Interactive, or the Sims franchise. These all existed and were successful because market research showed that they did well for the cost with women, or that women were the largest playerbase of the S…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:38 AM
2

Pretty sure a lot of countries use 3. Guilty for "definately did it", Not Guilty for "we can't prove they did it beyond a reasonable doubt" and Innocent for "we KNOW he didn't do it, and now the accuser is getting done for perjury".
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:06 AM
2

Agreed. It's my understanding that the culture in asian countries like Japan predominantly places the male in the labour role, doping the work to earn the money, and the female in the household head role where she controls the financial stuff and takes care of the home/kids. The arrangements often are more practical than romantic to the point of being pre-arranged by the parents of both families, often for political/economic gain. These days the women still expect the men to go out and slave awa…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:48 AM
1

Instantaneous measurements, sure, cause of glycogen and hydration. But like I said, you need to be precise, not accurate. This means doing things like drinking similar amounts of water, weighing at similar times of the day etc., and even if you don't, as long as it's pretty random then it will get averaged out over multiple measurements. You are learning and measuring nothing Yes you are. We know this works because ti's been repeated with a good degree of accuracy over millions of trials. I don'…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:11 PM
1

You cannot correct for a systematic uncertainty which you do not even know the direction of You DO know the direction of the error, it can be gained from your weight change. Weight goes up, you underestimated your intake or overestimated your output. Weight goes down? The opposite. Doesn't matter which side of the equation you take it off because they are opposites so it balances out. In fact, you don't even really need your TDEE for this method to work well enough. If you don't care about the s…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:50 AM
1

No Yes. The whole point is to predict weight gain/loss No it isn't. The point is to fudge numbers to eliminate the impact of the unknowns and get an equation that "is about right". There is only ONE variable that is practical to measure for a normal person on a regular basis. Weight change. Body composition would be more useful, but it's A) more complex to make use of, and B) more unreliable and impractical to measure. It's more practical to weigh regularly and eyeball guesstimate composition ev…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:05 AM
2

If I'd been Milo I would have laughed, called them all a joke and walked off halfway through my opening statement. When your debate opponent just retorts to quoting real world statistics with "that's not true" there is no hope for reasonable debate. Also, fuck the host for being so obviously biased as to introduce the fucking question by giving his version of the answer. Actually, how does a show like this even exist? It's pretty terrible really.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 10:02 AM
1

You don't need to be precise, but you need to be accurate Actually, No. it's the other way around. You need to be precise (always getting about the same value), but not accurate (it doesn't matter if you are always off by 50 calories, so long as you are consistient about that error). Otherwise your errors will add up No they won't, your errors are accounted for when you calculate your "perceived" TDEE. Think of it as solving simultaneous equations. You know one of your inputs (how much you eat) …
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:31 AM
1

Male grooming for the ladies seems to have become a thing slowly over the last decade or so, the whole "metrosexual" craze. I don't really have an issue with it, if ladies prefer my balls shaved and I care enough about one of them to let them see them then I might bother. I like shaved legs/armpits etc. on ladies, if I would want them to make the effort for me then it's only fair I do the same for them. I wouldn't bother going out of my way to do it just in case though.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:58 AM
1

LOL then why count calories. Because you don't need to be accurate, just consistient, and the maths still works out fine. I explained this already. Not exactly a strategy for combating the obesity epidemic, though. It's perfectly viable and if people had been doing what I advocate from the start they wouldn't have gotten into this position in the first place because they would have never got fat and they can happily sit at eating maintenance. You fucked up by getting so fat, this is your penance…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:52 AM
1

They do have pretty comprehensive lists of stuff they do though, there is a reason they take so long to get ready for anything. Sure they mostly do it for themselves, but it doesn't leave a hell of a lot room for other stuff really. Where as even 10 years ago the idea of a guy shaving his balls to impress the ladies was laughed at and I still chortle a bit when I see a guy with the neckline of his t-shirt perfectly shaved out of his otherwise virulent and untamed chest hair (seriously, if you're…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:46 AM
1

To be fair, that's pretty tame for George. He'll quite happily blow a guy on stage for his birthday. The man gives 0 fucks. Also, he made this which was fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:01 AM
1

It matters. A lot No, it really doesn't. You can't accurately measure it anyway. You will produce fat, whether you need to or not Doesn't matter that much if you are burning more fat than that due to caloric deficit already. This is not like a +- 1000 calorie thing. It's like +-50 calories. It's all noise and will be taken into account perfectly by my method without ever having to even worry about it. Then you will get hungry enough to make up the difference. Then harden the fuck up and deal wit…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:15 AM
1

It doesn't, but it also doesn't matter that much. At the end of the day gut micro-biome only affects how many calories you get from something, but that's functionally no different from assuming the opposite reaction from your TDEE. Google the "typical" calories in food, assume that's consistent and accurate (it's generally pretty good on average), and then google a guesstimate "calculator" for TDEE and bung your numbers into that. Aim to eat about that number for a few weeks, track your weight, …
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:50 AM
1

Perhaps, then again, perhaps I'm not the best person to be making judgments on stuff like this, I tend to disagree with society pretty often about who the "really beautiful" women are. Still have no idea how anyone can find Kim Kardashians cartoonish butt anything other than comical.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 08:44 PM
1

Actually, I get the impression that a lot of African American men can't stand African American women... I also know A LOT of white men who are into Asian chicks. Maybe it's different in less ethnically diverse places, but there is a reason that there are ALWAYS "Asian" and "Latina" categories on porn sites, but rarely "European" ones, and NEVER "white" ones. I'd also argue local availability is a matter of convenience, not preference. Especially in less diverse countries it's probably more a mat…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:27 AM
1

true, but you have to have fucked it up pretty badly to get a meaningful change out of it. Fecal Transplants are definitely interesting (I recommend getting it in pill form where it's got no poop left in it, just bacterial colonies), but I think the importance of microbiomes and gut bacteria get overstated a bit. Ideally we would just teach people not to get to that state in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:04 AM
1

There is a bunch of them around, it's from a study that had massive data sets. This pic is likely incomplete. At the end of the day, everyone has different preferences, I don't think familiarity is anything to do with it. I mean, I've seen pictures of some stunning looking central African women before, yet I've seen like 10 black people in real life tops. Not many Mediterranean women where I live either, although we do have a fair few middle-eastern and Indians here, especially in the academic e…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:56 AM
2

0.4g/lb is a pretty good ratio from memory. You definitely do not want to go low fat and personally I think super high fat/Keto is a bit dumb because it makes it a lot harder to get decent micronutrient balance, multi-vits are pretty much madatory with it. The other thing I guess you could try is Zinc supplementation, it supposedly helps with testosterone related issues, although that ones a long shot.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:31 AM
1

Are you indian or ethiopian, or how comes you prefer these women? Going by average faces and nationality, Ethiopian women are actually quite attractive, as are Indian women. Funnily enough, Eastern bloc women are supposedly renowned for being quite attractive, but they seem some of the less attractive to me in those pictures, I guess it could be a case of strong tendencies to either end of the scale instead of just being good looking on average? Personally, I think the Mediterranean/More western…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:10 AM
2

Sounds like stress could be a factor. Perhaps try higher fat diets as well? Also, do you know the exact test levels? The "within range" bounds tend to be a bit generous on the low end of the scale, plus it varies a lot based on timing etc. as well, so unless you got regular tests and charted them it might not be so useful. So basically relax and eat more bacon.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:48 PM
3

Ring again and tell her to submit it in writing or comply with your request or you will be making a formal complaint to her employer. If you have an actual issue you don't want to just keep treating the symptoms, you want to fix the damn problem so you don't need to take drugs that could have possibly negative side affects. The nurses gender is irrelevant here, she is simply not doing her job. She's doing the equivalent of giving someone with a broken leg a crutch and lifetime supply of morphine…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:42 PM
4

You can estimate it with sufficient accuracy using google to find calorie counts (or reading the packaging) and tracking your weight regularly on a scale. satiation isn't always accurate, you might still be hungry because you are deficient in something in particular, however you might still have eaten enough calories already, so eating more to satisfy the hunger will still make you fatter. If you eat nothing but carbs you will likely still be hungry because you have protein/fat deficiencies for …
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:37 PM
18

TL;DR - Women need to step up their game and start participating in things.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:24 PM
2

I brought up the subject of feminism to strike up a conversation Today in part 1: of "how to commit social suicide".
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:22 PM
1

That's a fair comment, however it's also a pretty safe bet she would admonish men for doing what she did, if not directly, then after feminist prompting. It's not even so much her that's being shamed though, she is just being used as an example of when there would be no outrage at the scenario despite the fact that men get endless shit or even monetary fines over this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:18 AM
3

OBVIOUSLY ALSO SPOILERS BELOW: Actually, the more I've been thinking about it, the more a lot of Rey's apparently unexplained ability does have some tenuous explanation, pretty much everything really. She knows how to repair ships because it's essentially the same knowledge needed to know whats useful salvage and where to find it, she's probably good at fighting because she would have to fight other salvagers just so she can eat. If she didn't get real good, real quick she simply would have star…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:11 AM
1

I'm pretty sure if the world was 100% led by women there'd be bullshit fights about stupid shit on the regular between countries. In b4 Germany nukes Sweden because because Sweden's Prime Minister wore the same dress to the UN summit as Germany, but it looked better on her. That bitch.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:07 PM
1

They aren't being shamed for being attracted to mostly naked men, they are being shamed for engaging in massive amounts of hypocrisy. Nobody cares that they enjoy looking these men, what they care about is that if they caught a man ogling up any female competitors at weigh-ins they would probably be all up in their face and making a big deal about it like the men were doing something inherently evil.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 10:44 PM
1

It never wasn't, I'm just confused as to the reason you felt the need to interject with something outside the scope of the existing conversation.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:50 AM
1

That is not a very compelling argument. Care to point out where I made a mistake in my logic?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:12 AM
1

It's not pointless when attempting to be the absolute best, but it's pointless in the context of this conversation, or any one about getting really strong which was the issue I and others took with many of the other statments in the thread and why we commented. You can be both shredded and so strong as to completely blow the minds of even regular gym goers. If your a mediocre strongman then it's not a sacrifice you have to make either, it's basically only when your at the top, and even then guys…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:11 AM
1

Steroids are perfectly safe * when used under medical supervision. It's pretty easy to fuck up your health if you don't know what you are doing, don't keep an eye on your bloods, or source from dodgy places. SARMs are looking like a WAY safer alternative and nearly as effective too. Personally I think Steroids should be available as a prescription medication for anyone that wants them, it cleans the whole process up and makes it safer. It also means that proper research on them can get through e…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:49 PM
1

The average Powerlifter IRL looks like a DYEL fatty tbh. Just saying. ONLY in the SHW categories, and maybe the MASSIVE ones like 308 and maybe 242. Anything 220 and below, unless they are amateur grade is usually pretty ripped. Being fat means less muscle, which means less strength in any weight limited grade. SHW only get fat because there is no weight limit and when you get fat you can generally get another 5-10% strength through greater muscle mass, plus a host of mechanical benefits from fa…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:39 PM
1

This whole thread has basically been about how you can't be REALLY strong without sacrificing aesthetics. Thats not even remotely true. I never claimed what you said was untrue, just that it was irrelevant and a pointless distinction anyway because it's so insignificant to getting huge amounts of strength. I mean, we are talking about the same kind of difference not sleeping for 10 hours a day can cause as well, or getting the movement pattern a tiny bit wrong. Fuck, even THINKING TOO MUCH could…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:34 PM
1

Sure, he could maybe get 5-10% stronger if he got fat as hell, but he is already the 1% of the 1%, why would he bother? Go look at the records on powerlifting watch. Dan Green for example has the 220 total record at ~2100lbs. The SHW total (heavier than 308) is ~2300. Thats NOT a big difference for over 100lbs probably. Dan vs Don, the SHW who was over 100lbs heavier and about 4 inches taller than dan. The difference between a strong lean person and the absolute pinnacle they could reach regardl…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:45 AM
1

Video came off as pretty much feminst propaganda, you didn't miss much.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:28 AM
3

For the first 12-13 years of my life I thought "whore" was "hoar" (wrinkly gnarled old lady). Didn't get why people were so upset about it :\ Then I found out what it actually meant and was even more confused because I didn't see what the big deal about having sex for money was...
/r/MensRights03/01/16 11:06 PM
1

Seriously, between being 6'8 and 300lbs with low body fat and the fact they do a shitload of training all day for the top level ones they have to eat like 10k calories just to maintain (none of this celebrity 10k calories workout diet crap, legit NEED). Thats the kind of thing professional competitive eaters do once and feel shit afterwards. These guys do that EVERY DAY. And thats on top of drinking gallons of water to stay hydrated. Thats straight up scary.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:51 PM
0

I'd argue that this is a semantic error though, the verdict is not "innocent", it's "not guilty" unless they do actually get proven innocent. Also, by proclaiming them innocent that would immediately places the accuser as being guilty of perjury as it is stating their accusation was false. But then we have to prove they were guilty or they are innocent too, which is a logical paradox. They can't have both lied about it and not lied about it at the same time. Thats why I made the distinction, jus…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 10:17 AM
0

Common practice for competitive lifters is to bulk between comps and then cut down for the comp. His version of no longer having abs is probably still "having abs" for most people, and regardless, when he has abs (comp days) he is still 3x as strong as most "strong" people.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:18 PM
1

Thats technically true, but we are talking of a difference of like 10%. You can still be strong enough to make guys like Channing Tatum look like a child playing with balloons for weights and have the same body fat. It's pretty normal for non-super heavyweight powerlifters and olympic lifters because they want to maximise performance in their weight class. Just look at liu xiaojun, one of the strongest men in the world at his weight class (or any really, dudes a beast) and hes aesthetic as fuck.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:15 PM
1

It's often called "old man strength" as well. It basically comes from two things, a long time building work capacity, and a long time practicing movements to where it's optimal and requires the least effort. It's actually less strength and more proficiency/efficiency. You can see the same in powerlifting for example. Some skinny 59kg'er might easily deadlift 200kg for an opener, some large, strong guy might struggle to get 180 though because he doesn't know what he's doing and tries to stiff leg…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:05 PM
0

The issue is that because "strong" is a relative term it's extremely biased in it's magnitude by the swathes of VERY weak people out there. The difference between weak and "strong" for most men is 6 months to a year of reasonably simple training. Those "strong" people however are still a LONG way away from their actual strength potential however, to the point where next to someone who is actually strong (as in at the max strength of 50% of men in the world or greater) they are still pretty weak.…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:01 PM
1

Not that many. Having abs is counterproductive to getting stronger, you will ALWAYS be stronger when eating enough caloric surplus to get fat. Guys like Thor only end up with visible abs because they got so much juice in them and they are so tall that they simply CAN'T eat enough to get fat, it's not physically possible for them to shove enough food down their pie holes. I say this as someone who actively powerlifts and enjoys watching comps/strongman.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 09:46 PM
1

In the case of fats, yes. In the case of, say... gender politics it could also be relevantly used. The words them selves a not inherently good or evil, they are just a collection of letters on paper/your screen. It's purely down to how they are used. In many cases SJW/Feminist types DO use it as an insult (shorthand for evil patriarchial shitlord), how ever that doesn't mean it's always used in that manner. Normalizing aberrance, it could be used that way, and I have no doubt it is, but I've not…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:09 AM
0

but given how almost all naturally occurring instances are cis, there is little point in identifying them as cis When it's inappropriate, sure. Nothing to do with it being cuel, it's just menaingless noise in many cases. If everyone started calling them "cis-fats" then I would say they are being retarded. The only reason we pick out trans-fats in particular is because they have been shown to have adverse affects on health. If they hadn't then I would call differntiating them from cis-fats silly.…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:02 AM
2

Yup, and they should definitely be called out for it, I'm just pointing out that what they are saying is strictly true, the problem is the definition of gamers. We should attack the stats relevance to the discussion, not the stat it's self. Also, no need to credit Christina for anything in this case, people (including myself) have been pointing it out for YEARS in regards to the ESA surveys etc. Anyone who cares already knows this.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:03 PM
2

cis is latin for "on the same side", it's the opposite of trans which means "on the opposite side of". These are common scientific terms, coming up frequently in organic chemistry for example i.e. trans-fats, normal fats would be cis-fats, but given how almost all naturally occurring instances are cis, there is little point in identifying them as cis, just like it seems stupid to identify the vast majority of people as "cis-male" or "cis-female". It's kind of like hetero/homo, they are latin pre…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:01 PM
4

I think you will find they all STARTED in universities. The internet picked them up.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:52 PM
-1

the former deriding from 'the qualities and characteristics of puss' i.e. a cat for those aren't familiar with the word "puss". Although, "puss" possibly does have some derivation through german and female cats I believe.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:50 PM
0

There is a reason the assumption is "not guilty" instead of "innocent". They are not the same thing. When you don't know you can't say they were innocent because you... don't know... Thats why you presume they are not guilty, because you cannot reasonably punish them in that situation.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:45 PM
1

They'll just cite some study where questionnaires asked "have you ever had sex while drunk" and everyone that answered yes was actually raped, even if there were no successful cases on it, or if it wasn't actually rape.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:42 PM
1

I haven't read it yet (feel free to check for yourself), but I would presume not. Fingering the wrong guy (that wasn't supposed to be a pun, honest) doesn't necessarily mean it was false/baseless, just that she identified the wrong person. If she doesn't re-identify it might go tot he false pile, otherwise it would go to the inconclusive one. And given how hard it is to prove/disprove these kind of charges I would presume a large bias towards the inconclusive pile.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:41 PM
1

Chicks tell me I should smile more all the time. I just tell them I am but my outer mouth has poor mobility. Seriously, I can't even break a paralell line without it look horrendously fake due to everything around it having to contort to pull the corners of my mouth up. I just have a very stoic face :|
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:34 PM
1

Yup, we should just say what we really mean instead of trying to be nice. "Stop being such a miserable cunt".
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:32 PM
2

It's a true statistic, it just doesn't mean what they pretend it does. Most reasonable estiumations put the actual number of female "true gamers" at around 10-15%.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:30 PM
4

Women in tech.... A business woman, someone who was probably a model or PR rep, journalists, more journalists, a "diversity officer"... NONE of these positions are tech positions. Simply being in a "tech" company does not mean you work "in tech". If you are a CEO you work "in business". If you are a journalist, you work "in media". If you are a PR rep/Model, you work "in advertising". If you are a "diversity officer" you work "in some made up job that doesn't really do anything useful" (or I gue…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:29 PM
2

Quite frankly this whole situation is completely fucked up and doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I'm waiting for a more complete picture of what happened before I make any judgments, the whole scenario just seems completely insane.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:23 PM
3

It seems he was upset that he was treated like a poor black man. Awkward. No, it seems to me the point of his tweet was much more along the lines of "nobody cares when it happens to poor black people, maybe now that it's happening to a rich white guy someone will take notice". There is nothing awkward about being upset about getting assaulted by the police, thats just normal. Just cause he used the word "nigger" doesn't automatically make him a racist whining about being treated like a black per…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:21 PM
1

Not in specific instances. Here is the list of interaction categories and all interactions were supposedly put into those, although the actual results weren't in the paper that I could see. You asked a question, I posited a possible answer to that question. My knowledge about the specific interactions in this one test aren't really relevant to that.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:58 AM
1

What, and the plush toy shouldn't be investigated? It's much more apparent what they are, they are less interesting and in need of less investigation. It's not like they would have completely ignored its presence for all eternity. They would have looked at both, deemed the truck more interesting because they don't know what it is and investigated that first. Or they might have given the toy a cursory glance, decided it wasn't as interesting and then moved on. Whose to say the monkey didn't look …
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:09 PM
1

why the fuck would an animal have a natural tendency to play with something as un-natural as a toy truck?!?!? Because it's an unknown, it should be investigated and evaluated to see if can serve as a potential tool. As males are typically the ones fulfilling this role it makes sense they would have a natural inclination to it. Just like the females raise young and thus looking after the cue fluffy toy and pretending it's a baby makes sense. It's the standard evolutionary biology hypothesis which…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:38 PM
6

There is also the fact I'm pretty sure he didn't want to do it, and thus they A) had to pay him more to bribe him and B)... WARNING: SPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSI'm pretty sure he negotiated an "Alec Guiness", which is why he is only going to be in the first movie, and thus could argue for more compensation for a single movie, because the others are getting paid for all 3 SPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSS…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:29 PM
2

Reminds me of one of those old skool internet sites, it was just showing two pics of two different women and saying "which was better". It had an interesting rating algorithm for the pics which was calculated off weighted averages of how often a person was picked. This all culminated in a value to rate the persons attractiveness in units they dubbed "millihelens" based on the old greek story of Helen of Troy, and it represented how many ships would be sent to rescue them if they were ever kidnap…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:54 AM
0

I dunno, not many politicians really worthy of respect these days tbh. Key is far from the deon people like to make him out to be, but he's still the kind of guy that will waste nearly 30 million dollars trying change the countries flag, even though nobody was asking for it, nobody even really wants it, and hes rigged the system as much as possible to make it happen so he can "have a legacy" or some bullshit. If he really wanted to leave his mark he should have just spent the money on buying eve…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:14 PM
2

However, this is not isolated to specifically Muslim countries Yea, I think people tend to forget how horrific an effect Catholocism has had on Africa. The Christian parts of Africa tend to do WAY more horrific shit than the muslim parts. Burning witches, executing gays, not to mention those poor albinos. Not to mention the anti-condom stuff basically being responsible for the aids epidemic over there.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:43 AM
0

thats my point though, if the symptoms have a negative impact on the persons life, sure, thats bad. If they never even notice then it's kind of irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:39 PM
-1

But it is a bad thing If it causes no negative symptoms at all, or at least ones so subtle it has no perceivable impact on the persons live then it isn't really a bad thing... Sure it's not a good thing either, it's just a different thing.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:58 AM
1

Nope, other than going into your average strip club.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:46 AM
1

Catcalling? Perfectly fine with it. If you don't like it then you can easily ignore it and it's hard to see how someone telling you that they think your attractive is somehow "oppressive". When one your biggest problems in life is strangers telling you how hot you are.... your pretty fuckin lucky I'd say. Then again, it's not like feminists really make sense anyway. did you check out my post in /r/Cuckold? I have now, seems a strange place, but eh. What I'm talking about is like a whole 'nother …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 04:35 AM
1

Well, I think that if all MGTOWs in the world became celibate, it wouldn't lower the price of pussy. Do you agree with me on that? All the MGTOWs only? it probably would, but that huge, mostly because there aren't that many of them in the first place, and also, a good portion of them aren't the top shelf guys who drown in pussy (no offense to them, but being aforementioned stud isn't really condusive to coming into the whole MGTOW way of life). It would take a much more concerted effort from ALL…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:54 AM
1

For the first half of your comment: I can see some feminist influence int he lagnuage, but at the end of the day I don't care what ideologies someone ascribes to or what labels they use, I judge based on actions. The FAQ seems mostly reasonable and I've never seen or heard of any unreasonable actions from their mods. And your complaints about it seem misplaced because those comments you say you want? They wouldn't get removed unless you asked the mods to do so. I fail to see what the problem is.…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 11:32 PM
1

No, men aren't encouraged to objectify women however they want in /r/gonewild - it has to be feminist-approved objectification. Have you read the Gonewild FAQ? Reading that for the first time now, but it all seems pretty sane and reasonable to me. for example: What do I do about unwanted comments? If someone makes a request for something you're not into, or even something you find a bit offensive, it's best to just ignore it. Not everyone is going to be into everything you're into. There are goi…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:17 PM
3

Just to be clear, the game wasn't blocked/banned from the west, the publisher simply decided they didn't want to sell it here, citing the probably backlash from feminists as the cause. They could still sell it if they wanted to, they just don't want to. It's possible this was an intentional ploy to drum up sales via the Streisand effect, in which case it's clearly working. Having said that, this is a perfect example of how these internet feminists and SJW's are clearly hypocrits who should be sh…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:45 AM
3

If a company ever starts producing legitimately sexist or misogynist videogames they will probably make a fortune. Outrage by Sarkeesian et al will drive sales through the roof. Basically Hatreds marketing in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:44 AM
1

Well, unlike those pornstars, I'm actually talking to you and asking you to jack off to my tits! Search> Camgirl. Now the girl in the porn is "talking to me" and asking me to jack off to her tits, plus I get the whole show. Unless you plan to start PM'ing me your /r/gonewild submission history you're gonna have a hard time competing with that for "jackoffableness". Speaking of /r/gonewild, thats a place where men are encouraged to "objectify" women, but it's a contextually appropriate action the…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:47 AM
3

So, of course the obvious reply is Actually, it seems to me the obvious reply is they are trying to open dialogs about these issues, bring attention to them, and have society view them as valid issues so that funding caan be gathered to actually do something about them. But feminists are shutting all that down by lobbying against it, calling people who try to bring it up misoginysts and caliming that mens issues aren't that big a deal and MRA's are trying to maliciously hurt women and black peop…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:17 AM
1

If they didn't, I wouldn't have had to directly ask my fans to jack off to my cleavage lol A) How do you know they weren't and just didn't bother to tell you? B) No offense, but why would I jack off to your tits when I can go to redtube/pornhub/whatever and find way more explicit and erotic stuff to jack off to? No, you can't make ugly guys' cocks more valuable to the average woman by increasing the price of cock - stop thinking about everything in terms of economic theory lol. Why not? You need…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:09 AM
1

it's more about changing men's attitudes than anyone else's Men don't really need any encouragement to tell chicks they attractive, if anything women encourage it anyway for the ego trip and power of rejection. Women are the ones who need to take some initiative and express their sexuality if anything (something you don't seem to have any issue with at least). Wouldn't you benefit from guys starting their own sexual revolution Probably not, because like I said, men don't really have any issues w…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:06 AM
1

Honestly, I think women would complain about it more (it's basically a humblebrag for them), men would cop more shit for it and anti-male sentiments would increase. They go bonkers when it's like a fringe Internet thing, what do you would think would happen if they actually had real world examples to complain about? plus women would also become more hesitant to socially interact with men due to the whole 80/20 thing. They don't want to fuck most of the guys so they don't want to have to deal wit…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:24 AM
1

Just what you've shown on it's own? Maybe? I'd probably need to see a bit more skin than that though. I mean, just cleavage on it's own is pretty mundane and I'm not 12 any more. Plus, like I said, I'm more of a whole package kinda guy myself, disembodied tit's alone are a bit eh, it's all about the aesthetics of the whole package.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:21 AM
1

Guys should feel free to say "nice tits" and no woman should consider it to be sexual harassment In many situations, sure, just not ALL of them. I agree it shouldn't be sexual harassment, guys are perfectly entitled to want to slap their meat between a womans tits if thats what floats their boat. Just saying that it's not always the most appropriate time to express that desire. I mean, guys can pretend to be all proper and intellectual and ignore cleavage or they can be honest and let the cavema…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:59 AM
1

I think your missing my point to a degree, and taking things from one extreme to another. All I'm saying is that social etiquette does serve some purposes. It's not appropriate to discuss a womans tits when thats not the subject of the conversation not because there is something wrong with commenting on a womans tits, but because it doesn't really add anything to the conversation at hand. It's kinda derailing and irrelevant. To use cell phones as an analogy, your position seems to be a bit like …
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:26 PM
1

Does it have to be a mandatory requirement? Obviously, if your intention is to have social interaction with a woman and you can't do that then you have failed, thus it is a requirement to successfully have social interactions with women. What if guys were just honest about what they would rather pay attention to? If I ever met George Clooney, I'd be direct about wanting him in my panties lol. Well thats different, if the conversation just doesn't interest you, but the boobs do then thats fine. I…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 07:53 AM
1

Are you sure it's not hard to pay attention to both adequately? Well... I mean it's basically a mandatory requirement for having adequate social interaction with an attractive female so yea, it shouldn't be hard for a normally functioning person. You have to be pretty hard up for tit exposure if you can't concentrate on both well enough. If a guy couldn't do that then I'd probably have the same reaction as I would have to a woman who, for example, couldn't hold a conversation with George Clooney…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:48 AM
1

Yes, it's been quite amusing this season. As for ignoring an argument due to boobs, if you never cared about the argument in the first place I see nothing wrong with that. If you went for the argument but were... distracted... I guess it's not the end of the world, but then I wouldn't exactly say you should exactly be proclaiming it proudly either, it's not exactly hard to pay attention to both adequately. And you can always listen to the argument first and then re-watch to oggle later
/r/MensRights21/11/15 05:30 AM
1

Even if it had happened in a vacuum, she was filmed basically doing the opposite of her job to push an agenda, not to mention behaving like child and undermining all the respect students might have for her station, leaving her unable to fulfill her role at the university. Thats at least disciplinary level shit if not a terminal offense. The fact that she supports a movement that is seeking to harm members of faculty who have done nothing wrong just makes this an instant "cut out the tumor" momen…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:57 AM
1

Well, if you put your titties on display and then complain that a bunch of people notice them then your just being retarded and hypocritical. If you complain that people discount your argument on the grounds of you being a slut or whatever, then thats fine. Thats rarely what happens though. If you really want to hammer sex-positive feminism hypocrisy I'd suggest going after the whole "affirmative consent" and "everything is rape" angles, they are the really blanket antithetical dogmas of the mov…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:53 AM
1

In many countries physical assault is touching somebody, especially if it's aggressive Seems a bit tenuous and open to interpretation to me, I feel like the legal definition should be more concrete i.e. "physical interaction with the intent to cause non-injurous harm". Is there no grade below assault for "unlawful contact" or similar to cover these cases? I personally wouldn't charge over that though, I'd charge over the fact she openly conspired to commit assault. Again, simply conspiring seems…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:53 AM
0

She didn't really hit it, it was more of a limp wristed attempt to grab it/push it out of the way. While it could technically be construed as assault it's so incredibly minor it would be more of a "disciplinary action" than "going to jail" kind of offense. I doubt calling for muscle is a crime either, although if they acted on it then it definitely would be and the intent alone should be grounds for dismissal, especially given how antithetical her behavior was to her job.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:44 AM
0

A simple threat of violence being assault seems excessive and rife for abuse as a legal definition. I always took it to mean intentional non-injury inducing physical contact i.e. shoving someone or tripping etc., Battery being intending to hurt someone i.e. stomping their kneecaps in or swinging a bat at their head etc.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:41 AM
1

Not saying you have to have anything to do with the youtube comments, I just think it should be left open for those that do. As for the downvotes, it happens whenever you say something other people don't like generally. I get downvoted all the time for saying that 30 fps shouldn't be considered good, but bare minimum acceptable over on /r/games all the time and for similar comments.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:36 AM
1

I'd discourage this, this is how you get echo chambers and little valuable input. Youtube comments are pretty cancerous, but the videos comments are the ONLY place where EVERYONE who has seen the video can have a discussion. You don't have to read em if you don't want, but you should at least give other people the opportunity to read and engage with others.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:41 AM
4

saw some footage, dunno about assault, but she definitely tried to grab the dudes camera and upon failure called for "some muscle" to remove him forcefully from a public space he had every right to be in. She should definitely lose her job over her behavior. The cancer needs to be cut out before it becomes incurable.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:35 AM
1

No problem, I enjoy interesting discussions. The current state of feminism is a pretty sad affair. Don't forget though that they aren't so much ignoring the class struggle aspect, it's more that they legitamately believe (or at least claim to) that they are being used and oppressed like slaves or the working class. In the case of women I can 100% agree that it's probably more about gaining/maintaining power and privilege than anything else. But then, dick is in heavy supply, they don't really ne…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:37 AM
1

I can agree that is an entirely plausible motivator for some cases.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:34 AM
1

I seem to have a similar opinion of Feminism as you do Probably. You are projecting your opinion of Feminism based on the research you have done I'm doing what any sane person would do when evaluating the viability of a choice, observing the evidence and listing the positives and negatives of that choice. There is just a hell of a lot more negatives, hence why I'm of the opinion it is a thoroughly terrible choice. You have assumed that these people had an interest in reading the same material an…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:03 AM
1

Scarcity. Obtaining a means of survival is on par with reproduction. I'm not arguing that sex isn't a primary motivator for men to obtain these things. You're arguing that they are mutually exclusive A) Surviving is hardly scarce in the modern world, especially so in countries where feminism is strongest because big daddy govt will take care of you. It's probably one of the smallest motivators for anything these days. B) I'm not arguing they are mutually exclusive, just that sex is a FAR bigger …
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:09 AM
1

What are these false premises? That sex isn't the primary motivator for men attaining wealth and power. I mean, it's straight up evolutionary biology. You want to talk about false premises? The Prime Minister of my country is a Feminist and just made the cabinet gender balanced. And I bet that earned him the admiration of the men who clearly would have got those seats if not for the policy. It clearly takes a huge amount of self respect to isntitute a policy that you know will quite liekly harm …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:25 AM
1

In those examples you pointed to, they aren't taking away something someone already has That doesn't seem to gel with business environments these days. There is only so much money around, if a company HAS to hire x number of women, it will be made financially viable by removing male people who already have those positions. NOBODY is growing, everyone is downsizing. Those positions WILL come at the expense of men already in them. I'm sure there are other examples of funding for mens things from g…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:01 AM
1

I'm saying you have constructed your logic on a collection of flawed premises, and thus your conclusion is not accurate. I agree with the idea that Patriarchal theory is basically a rebranding of marxist classism, but otherwise I think you've made a bunch of leaps between unconnected points. Male feminists give up quite a bit, respect of themselves, respect of their peers, any hope of having a decent career by studying gender studies instead of something useful, and for what? so they can self-ef…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:08 AM
1

Besides if the only reason ever to make money is to get women then why do women even work? A large portion of them don't, thats where the whole "wage gap" thing comes from. They don't work because they don't have to work. The ones that do work (and work hard at having a good career) are largely single and constantly bitching how there aren't any good men (who conveniently earn more than them so they don't have to work any more). Coincidence? Probably not... Also, EVERY single person either needs…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:37 AM
2

What is the one thing that motivates a man more than women? Money and/or Success I think you fell at the first hurdle there buddy. I think money/success is sought after by men because it attracts women, not because men want it more than anything. I mean, who wants to have to slave away for 60-100+ hours a week for most of their life just so they can have a bigger house and TV and a nice car they barely get to drive anyway because they spend most of their non work life on trains/planes going to/f…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:35 AM
2

Wait, they don't need to be paid any more this year? I should tell my employer, it'll save them hundreds of thousands if not millions. Of course for coming up with such a successful initiative I expect a bonus, maybe I'll finally start getting that extra privilege check I keep getting told I'm due.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:29 AM
1

Yea, some people go crazy with it, although for those people I imagine it was less about what they thought and more about "hurr durr, I'm gonna be an asshat to you to prove how much better I am to cover for my crippling insecurities". If you think about the vast majority of atheist philosphies, i.e. skepticism, then really any kind of gnosticism is actually pretty antithetical to them. The whole point is to question everything, that also involves (probably applies most of all even) to yourself. …
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:36 AM
2

Yea, it's probably the more common meaning now that I think about it. I was thinking in situations like atypical and the "not" meaning. In the cases I gave though "without" is probably more accurate.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:30 AM
2

This is correct. Hence the "a" prefix in front of both, (a being the latin prefix for "opposed too" more or less. Theism is the belief in theistic entities, A-theism is the lack of belief in thestic entities. Gnosticism is the the certainty of belief, A-gnosticism is the lack of certainty of belief.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 07:41 AM
2

Atheism is not the declaration of non-existience. It requires the qualifier of gnosticism for that. A Gnostic Atheist is the only kind who claim to "Know" there is no god. The other kind, and BY FAR the most common form of atheism is agnostic atheism, which basically means they believe there is no theistic presence in the universe, but either they do not have a proof of this or believe it cannot be proven. Agnostic atheism is the most rational position to hold because the very premise of a theis…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 07:39 AM
1

Ironically I discovered the sub after being accused of being an MRA for not being fucking retarded. From memory it was for laughing at Anita Sarkessians obvious lack of knowledge about gaming, not to mention her extreme jumps of broken logic, during her kickstarter. At least, shortly before it basically got banned as a discussion topic. Came on here, saw a bunch of stories about people losing their kids, being pretty much made homeless by vindictive ex wives, pointing out the blatant "this would…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 07:39 AM
4

Either adjust your standards so you can date a man that makes less money than you I don't know if that the problem, theres probably plenty of men who do make more than them, just not enough more for their liking. Either that or the number of young women earning 60k or more is 15x higher than the number of men, which seems a bit exaggerated. So really it's actually much worse than you are stating.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:04 AM
2

Yup, you know what the best way to stop violence by men against women is? Nag them more! Force them to do stupid shit they don't want to and that has no value because you think you're more important than they are! Tell them they are pieces of shit who don't appreciate your glory. That will totally make them not want to punch you in the face for being an obnoxious cunt...
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:26 AM
1

Haha, makes more sense now.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:20 AM
1

I can't imagine how it could possibly easier to steal someones pants straight off their ass than a purse...
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:40 AM
6

This is why I need /r/swoleacceptance, because swole-kin are just as beautiful as anyone else.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:08 AM
5

Women can't have pants that show off their legs/thighs and pockets Women I know always complain about me keeping my wallet in my pocket, probably for the same reason. It's really the most sensible place for it though, jackets you take off regularly, it's easy to misplace it as a result (I've seen it happen heaps, never lost one myself though). If it's always in your pants then theres only one time you lose it, when you've lost you pants, in which case, you quite possibly have bigger issues to de…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:45 AM
3

First is waist, second is inseam I believe.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:42 AM
-3

It’s still tough for women to find a pair of pants Oh, go fuck yourself Agreed. Took me over a year to find a cut of Jeans that fit (Levi 503's if anyone is curious). That, and men that are working 40-70 hours a week have a lot less time to exercise than their part-tine-job wife does. I'd actually argue that is less of a problem for men, as in my experience Pants seem to cater for being overweight disproportionately in mens cuts. in fact, the whole reason I had such a hard time finding jeans tha…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:40 AM
2

So let me get this straight. It's men's fault for not doing enough housework? Whats worse is they seem to be implying that they are literally incapable of surviving on their own. Apparently single people don't have to do their own cooking and cleaning while also working a full time (or greater) job? How do all those people survive I wonder?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:51 PM
1

Tolerating others makes you a Social Justice Advocate. Not sure I agree with that. Social justice as a concept is that people should enact justice themselves based on what is essentially popular opinion. Being a Social justice Advocate means you support and promote lynching more or less. Being a Social Justice WARRIOR just means you actually go out and lynch people (or to be more modern, doxx them, accuse them of rape and publically slander them etc.)
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:43 AM
1

It's still pretty much the same as it's always been. It's perhaps a tad more serious than it used to be, but not by much.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:40 AM
1

It should be noted that this isn't the original text/panel order, the original can be found here (thanks for digging that one up, saving me the trouble /u/Toalmaster). Questionable Content is one of the only webcomics I've read that approaches topics like this and actually treats it really well instead of either being blatant fanservice to niche kinks or crazy overtly SJW/Feminist man hating (I'm looking at you Sinfest ಠ_ಠ ). It would be nice to see a small disclaimer explaining it's not origina…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:04 AM
2

What? QC never went anywhere near the SJW rabbit hole. It was handled extremely maturely and basically the whole character arc theme was the epitome of "it really doesn't matter that much". And if you have actually read the comic it's exactly the reaction you would expect from Marten. It's not pandering or forced at all. It's actually the only real example I can think of that DOES handle the topic well. If you were talking about Sinfest I could understand, but laying that on QC makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:58 PM
1

It seems to me that it's perfectly within the bounds of fair use as a transformative work (the thing being parodied/critiqued doesn't have to be related to the original work, just look at all those knockoffs of the famous "uncle sam wants you" poster for example). Having said that I think it should come with a disclaimer highlighting that it's not the original work, or even reflective of the originals content. I say that not so much because it is a legal requirement or anything, because I think …
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:55 PM
3

Not just any dominatrix, she is like some famous porn star/bondage community leadership figure. Also, Marten is like the most chill dude in the universe, really couldn't see this scene going down any other way than how it did in the original comic.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:44 PM
2

Definitely pick it up, it's a great web comic (the art to start with wasn't nearly as good, but it improves steadily). It's been going for ages, if my bookmarks are to be believed there is over 3000 pages so far, so it should keep you going for a LOOOONNNGGGG time.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:42 PM
1

Fun fact, NZ gave about twice as many lives in WWII relative to our population than the US did. We also gave more than Australia who also fielded a smaller percentage of their population than we did. So funnily enough it looks like we actually worked harder than either of them did protecting not only ourselves but much of Europe and Africa too. Do you really expect us, with a tiny fraction of the resources of other countries to to preform to the same level as them though? Thats extremely unreaso…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 07:33 AM
1

So we didn't spend over a decade in Timor We had nothing to do with any of the UN stuff there, never did any peace keeping or helping rebuild stuff? they have done nothing but bother the Aussies by moving to OZ Thats funny, because I keep seeing aussies complaining about how they are all coming over here, where we give them access to govt benefits, which they deny us over there. Please stop with the NZ is great act I never said NZ was amazing, jsut that we don't do NOTHING like you claim. do you…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:00 AM
1

Listen you are the one who called me racists Because thats essentially what you are being. You attacked all New Zealanders for no reason other than because they are New Zealanders. Would prefer I just label you "bigot" instead? Your the one who dismissed the contributions of NZ in numerous countries like Timor, lives lost in wars like Iraq and Afghanistan, WW1, WW2, Vietnam, and many others. Your the one implying we are ignorant of global affairs, deriding our economic and cultural contributions…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:26 AM
3

Here's the actual law from an official source in case you want something a bit more concrete than /u/jimmybrite's link. But yea, it's pretty shameful that this got through really (and now I'm going to jail for hurting the Judith Collins feelings probably). I actually heard on the radio apparently our police were working with authorities in Denmark to track someone down under this law :\ Can't find any official sources on it sadly, but it wouldn't surprise me. Sorry, we went full retard :'(
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:22 AM
1

Dude, NZ has masses of Asians, Indians (if you consider them different), middle eastern, polynesian (seriously, I think we actually have more Niueans than Niue) and pretty much every other nationality here. Fuck we even have lots of Canadians! It's far from some white colonial holy grail. I mean, how do you even know I'm not Maori? And you know the Maori aren't native to NZ, they settled it too? Did you know Winston Peters (the guy that said the stuff your so butthurt about) is Maori? And I'm ca…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:15 AM
4

It's already illegal to hurt peoples feelings on the internet in NZ, so it's basically already passed here.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:44 AM
2

It's Whinnie, this should be about as surprising as if Trump had said it in the US (if he hasn't already).
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:40 AM
-3

It's HAKA. If your going to be a racist dick at least google some basic shit so you get it right.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:38 AM
1

I've given you evidence of how a canon timeline is created differently from a real-life time line. I mean, you seem to understand the concept of a retcon. I've given you evidence of how things in the draft phase don't make it into canon. This isn't just "because I said so", I've provided evidence. These do not support your assertion that NOTHING is cannon until it is explicitly stated. They only support the assertion that cannon can be retroactively changed (which we both agree on). This was nev…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:38 AM
1

We got into canon and how it doesn't exist until it becomes canon. I did, you just said "no because I said so". And it has to be a philosophical debate because the very idea of cannon is philosophical by nature. Given the canon of Sam, saying they don't have a personality is sound No it isn't, we don't know because none has been given to us so we can't say one way or the other. I've already explained why this is. Feel free to explain why it's not in such a way as the very concept of fiction isn'…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 10:33 PM
1

Please give me an example of how one could "make inferences FROM the LACK of things"? Let's use Sam Sure. "Sam has no personality in your sentence, therefore Sam has no personality". That would be an inference of Sam's character from the lack of information presented. This is not a logically sound inference however as the absence of proof does not prove the negative, or else nothing would exist until after it is discovered, which is obviously impossible. Great, we agree. Ehh... Characters like M…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:59 AM
1

Are you telling me you didn't write these statements where you explicitly talk about inferences No, I'm telling you you didn't understand them, or their relevance int he context of my argument. Mika may not be important to whatever Ryu is dealing with, but she's still has literary merit. You can say that of literally ANY character, because they can be developed any any way the author sees fit with the only limit being the authors imagination, so again it's a largely irrelevant statement to make …
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:45 AM
1

You seem to be using "inferences" and "positive claims" interchangeably. You seem to think so, however that is what I have been trying to point out, they are different things and I see no logical inconsistencies in what I've stated so far, nor what you are presenting here. all I ask is for some evidence to back up that claim, hypothesis, inference, or posit Except posited hypotheticals do not really require evidence, they are hypotheticals because they are not proven true, simply not provably fa…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:13 AM
1

What is your point. "THAT YOU CAN"T" or "SO YOU SHOULDN"T DO IT"? There are two spearate parts to the statement. It is A is true and B is not true. Why are you asking "which is it, are A and B both true or false? You CAN'T make inferences from the lack of information. You SHOULDN'T make positive claims based on the lack of negating factors. The only thing we know about Sam, at that point, is they walked past Pat. Yes, hence why I didn't make positive claims, I posited hypotheticals instead. Whic…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:35 AM
1

Let me highlight the important parts of that quote that you have glossed over though You can't make inference if there is nothing to infer FROM. However if you make inferences FROM the LACK of things in infer from, your inferences can easily be wrong. SO YOU SHOULDN"T DO IT. THAT IS MY POINT. However you have repeatedly claimed that I WAS making inferences, despite me saying MY POINT was THAT YOU CAN'T i.e. You have no evidence to back up any of the statements you made. Except I didn't make any …
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:52 AM
0

Fuck, I give up. You aren't even conversing with me any more. You are conversing with yourself pretending to converse with me. You've ignored everything I've said so I don't see why there is any point in continuing this. Nothing you have said or continue to say is in any way reflective of the position I hold. You are arguing against your own strawman and despite my best attempts you refuse to accept correction on what I am telling you. Apparently you think you get to dictate the cannon of what I…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:44 AM
1

Your missing the context of the quote. What context is that? The several paragraphs before that of complaining about "insidious sexualisation" and cammy's design? Or the bit after where she claims Mika does not yet have any characterisation and so some has to be provided to define her in the way the author wants? Or the bit after that where she attacks the street fighter fanbase? You remember all the lewd comments that had to be deleted? You mean all the ones that may or may not have even existe…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:10 PM
1

I wouldn't say Cammy's ass is enourmous, and she's listed as only having a 35in hip measurement. She is 5'4 and her waist is 22" according to Capcom. thats a 0.63 w/h ratio, and she is also extremely lean for a women, which typically reduces that ratio SIGNIFFICANTLY as there is no longer any fat to contribute. Thats some seriously not inconsequential booty. We see Rainbow Mika is a character The author apparently doesn't. A quote from the article about Mika this is far from the first time I’ve …
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:21 AM
1

Your the one who told me "I DO see it all over Olympic wrestling however" I was referring to the use of form fitting clothing in combat sports. i.e. wrestling leotards. Can you show me some thong leotards in Olympic gymnastic competition or when Cammy's leotard isn't being presented as a thong? As I pointed out in my image, the actual shape of of the leotard is very similar, the main difference being that Cammy's ass is enormous and would swallow a wider bottomed leotard, so she would have to we…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:39 PM
1

The YouTube videos I watched, I didn't see a thong singlet. Could you give some examples of Olympic wrestlers in thongs? Wrestling is predominantly a mens sport, thong style leotards would be considered inappropriate on men. Womens wrestling leotards are modeled after mens. As I pointed out though, Cammy wears a Gymnastics leotard, and it's shaping is actually fairly consistient with olympic standards, the reason it looks a bit odd on her is her cartoonishly exaggerated figure, she has extremely…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:56 PM
1

But the writer of the article doesn't want the obtusely overt sexual presentation to overshadow the coolness of the character Thats fine, but then they should say so instead of making out like it's an attack on women. Do you think some characters are restricted by their clothing in the game, like they're slower or something? A few, but those ones typically have super powers to get around that. Most of the men are equally scantily clad. Dalsihm wears a loin cloth, Zangeif wears budgie smugglers, …
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:10 AM
1

but are you denying that internal qualities are unrelated to sexiness? No, just a different kind, also the kind that is explicitly the scorn of the author in one article but suddenly a good thing when it suits them in another. This is the exact thing the writer is hoping to avoid. Whats wrong with a character having obtusely overt sexual presentation? I mean, the author of the article actually DEFENDS it in this case anyway, saying it's appropriate to the characterisation that exists (but then s…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 09:11 PM
1

You might just be a visual person, but other people find internal qualities sexy also. If somebody is funny and smart, they get sexier. That is also unrelated to their physical portrayal, it is a separate aspect completely and the two have no bearing on each other. Ryu is sexy and well developed. He's a character that requires little introduction if you've been playing the series. This post now was the first time in 20+ years I've ever hard anyone describing Ryu as sexy, including women. In fact…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:17 AM
1

Their level of sexyness and their amount of development is unrelated though, and character design takes about the same amount of time for any character and can be communicated instantly where as character development takes a lot longer and can require great lengths to communicate. There are poorly developed un-sexy characters and nobody gives a fuck about them. It's hypocritical because with one breath she is saying Ryu is sexy and thats all that I care about (it's basically the only meaningful …
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:56 AM
1

I don't think I'm acting like it's a conspiracy Didn't say you were, my complaint is with the author of the article injecting that shit where it doesn't belong. Having read the article, out of 7 paragraphs 2 are devoted to the character, the other 5 are complaining about sexualisation (and the 2 that aren't still contain off comments about it anyway). The whole thing comes off as "I want to talk about this, but I'm going to ignore it to bitch about my agenda instead". Admittedly after looking ag…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:18 PM
1

Sure, but I wouldn't act like some sort of conspiricy is the reason why they don't get the limelight and that they deserve it more than a major character when they are clearly a less than popular bit character or that it should be an important thing when it clearly shouldn't. I assume like the previous fighting games, she'll have her own storyline when you choose to beat the game with her. I can't see why not, and if you like her then good for you. But why isn't the article linked all "yay thing…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:31 PM
1

Bad writing is bad writing. If a writer can't explore a bit character properly, then they shouldn't do it. You can't though. It's literally bad writing just by doing it for more than a couple of sentences. It's called "fluff" and it's a bad thing unless it's in supplementary materials which are 100% fluff. To do it properly she would basically need her own game, and I can't see that happening. Harry Potter is a great example. Neville Longbottom ... Now, I'm far from an expert on Harry Potter or …
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:51 PM
1

Why should arbitrary bit characters get explored though? They aren't important, or else they would be MAIN characters. Exploring in depth a character of no importance is just bad writing. It's a waste of story telling time, a waste of the readers time and it just bloats everything with useless noise. It's like complaining "why didn't random extra wizard kid C get more screentime! She didn't even get a proper name!" about a harry potter movie.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:26 PM
2

To be fair, Ryu is basically one of the main characters, you expect him to be one of the most developed as a character. I don't even know who the fuck this other chick is and she can't be that important if she hasn't been in any other SF game for almost 2 decades...
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:36 AM
3

Look. I consider myself very conservative. However, there is a clear gender bias in India, and that's not considering any liberal media speak on the matter. Not necessarily going to disagree with you, but this isn't a case of that. It's purely economics. Daughters cost money, may or may not provide a return and if they do it's probably not going to be meaningful till they get married and you get dat fatass dowry (assuming you can sell them off to someone rich enough). A son will go out and get a…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:03 AM
1

Fair enough, although I'd argue that back seat entry would probably work well enough too, or boot at a push and even if it is a pain, still preferable to getting soaked cause someone else can't park.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:11 AM
3

Sometimes the only way to show someone how utterly stupid their own arguments are is to use them against them and let them obliterate their own dumb ass.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:25 AM
3

Serious question... Why did you not just get in the passengers and scoot over the center console? At the very lease get int he passengers seat and wait... it's not raining in there.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:14 AM
0

Technically it can, sure. But I've literally never seen it in my entire life. I've heard ONE second hand account from a friend who claimed some chick at uni said to him "enjoying that pie you fat fuck?", and that is it. Sure people might call eachother fat at school when they are kids, but it's virtually never about the person being fat, it's just kids begin assholes, if the person wasn't fat they would called gay/butch, stupid, a racist slur or whatever else the person can come up with on virtu…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:30 AM
1

Sure, but if they go on the internet and claim they ate 500 calories a day for a month and gained 18 lbs... well someone either needs to give them a lot of shit for either being terminally retarded/a blatant liar or the fucking nobel prize for discovering a way to create matter out of nothing. The whole "don't bully them, we should be nice and encouraging etc." culture, you know what that gets us? What we currently have. 5ft, 300+lb women who think they DESERVE to be found attractive, but no sho…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:11 AM
1

but the point is many (if not most) fat people don't, It's not for lack of availability, what I gave is stock info to the point of being a meme. Go on any fitness focused forum and everyone will tell you the same. and what reason do they have to trust you about it? Well, I can play argument ad populum (technically a logical fallacy, but still reasonable for making guesses of validity sometimes), and I can cite peer reviewed literature. I also have no stake in their specific choice of weight loss…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:07 AM
1

you argue that you're morally obligated to bully and shame because it's the only tactic that works No, IF it's the only tactic that works. If there are freindlier ways then use those. The reason I don't address other scenarios than shaming is because they are generally so straight forward there is nothing to talk about, dealing with people open to reason and logic is generally very straight forward and a single person can do it. Dealing with tards who don't care if they are right as long as they…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:57 AM
0

i still do not promote bullying/shaming tactics, regardless of the chances. that's something you're just not going to change my mind on. it's not a fact-based thing where you can prove me wrong, it's a moral issue. If you want to investigate the morality of it consider this. These people do not care if they are right or wrong, only that they are validated in tier opinions. Logic cannot sway them, simply disagreeing will not sway them. The ONLY way to change their mind is to make them think that …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:43 AM
2

good to know, but that all still assumes a good diet is easily doable. It is unless you are sub 5ft 100lb woman it really is easily doable (and even then it's not "hard" for the tiny chick, just they have less room to play with so they need to wait a little longer for the results, not that they have much weight to loose at that size anyway). the middle class is disappearing and we have an increasing number of people who are eating on a budget And it don't get any cheaper than rice, beans and bul…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:07 AM
1

You obviously missed my point then. The core of your premise seems to be that you shouldn't say anything because it could be not their fault. I'm saying that this is irrelevant because the chances of actually meeting someone where it's not a direct result of their choices (outside of mental illness pretty much) is infinitesimal. Your more likely to get struck by lightning. It's like saying you should avoid all muslim people because thy could have bombs under their clothes, it's just a silly argu…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:20 AM
5

Right, that's called a starvation diet, because you are denying your body resources it NEEDS. Not wants, not desires, but NEEDS. Thats not how it works. What your body NEEDS is your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). This is always less than your Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE). The 100-200 cal less is less than TDEE, not BMR. Because the calories you burned for your TDEE have to come from somewhere the body takes them from that. That is what fat is for. Now, you can even drop below your BMR and …
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:33 AM
6

first, i've never heard anyone say "abs are made in the kitchen". It's actually extremely common in fitness circles when talking to new people who "want to get abs" by going to the gym. Basically it means "you are doing it wrong. Going to the gym wont get you abs on it's own, you need to sort out your diet if you want those". second, yea, some people do. other people don't. to some people who have very little free time, that free time is valuable and they would rather not spend it at the gym. Th…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:21 AM
3

to play devil's advocate not everyone is overweight at their own fault. This is really only true for a fraction of a percent of the worlds population however. Conditions that cause unavoidable weight gain are EXTREMELY unusual, like you can count the number of people IN THE WORLD with them on your fingers by yourself. some people have disorders regarding the way their body processes food that really screws up their metabolism This doesn't actually affect their weight gain however, at worst it af…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:56 AM
1

Yea, I'm not saying these breaks will be needed with alarming frequency or anything, just that it can be a real concern sometimes so it's reasonable to have some allowance for it as needed.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:16 AM
2

But I'm a fat dude who does very minimal voluntary exercise Which means you probably aren't capable of exerting peak force from your muscles, certainly not for a prolonged period of time. A highly trained athlete will probably generate significantly more heat because their muscles are doing a lot more work (as in force produced over time) than you will be. Also, some skinny chick probably has WAY less surface area to cool herself with than you do, just saying. High heats can have pretty serious …
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:47 AM
2

Having been in 30 degrees in Aus, 30 degrees isn't shit there compared to some other places. My rellies from there bitched and moaned about the heat here in NZ when it was only low 20s. 25+ sucks ass a lot of the time here, but 30 degrees in Perth is comfy as fuck. Also, it tends to be WAY more humid in the UK than AUS so 30 degrees there is probably a lot worse as your body can't evaporate sweat as well to cool down.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:43 AM
1

I frightens me that they acknowledge all the reasons for the lower average wage for women but still claim that womens wages are unfairly lower. Thats some serious cognitive dissonance going on. It's occupational segregations fault! Never mind women intentionally choose these fields while avoiding the hard ones (which is why men dominate them). So lets give money to womens preferred jobs (but not mens, bet those sewage and road workers would hate to get paid more anyway) while telling them how ho…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 09:40 PM
2

Dunno, it looks like voat is already getting harassed into compliance, after ddos attacks, people petitioning the host to drop them successfully on bullshit claims and now paypal freezing their account on the same bullshit (likely after brigading them and submitting shitloads of kiddie porn), it looks like Atko is caving :(
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:05 AM
2

Internet dick The technical term is e-Penis.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:10 AM
3

Sometimes it's "it's" or "or" as well. You don't capitalize connectives in titles, it's called "Title Case".
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:27 AM
1

Nah, brand got bought by Infogrames (well, hasbro interactive did I think, but then Infogrames ate them up). They had the exclusive D&D licence for a while, although that went tits up a while ago too I think.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:52 PM
2

But you can accidentally the word.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:19 AM
1

That's a mere guess. So no better than your argument? Nice try at misrepresentation. Not really See, under that kneecap is a lot of bone -- you can damage the knee, but only under rare circumstances can you stomp it in. Sure, but the only damage you can effectively do aside from some light bruising is to tear tendons or meniscus, nothing else int he knee short of physically destroying the bones themselves will have any meaningful effect. And as I already highlighted earlier, damaging your ACL/MC…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:51 AM
1

No, i say that as if you can't maximize both I'd say my conservative estimate of 225 (66% of Thompsons bench) is hardly maximizing. That's why few sprinters also run marathons Yes, but fights are much more akin to sprints than fights. You have 3-5 rounds, each of which only lasts for 5 mins max. Thats a far cry from the HOURS marathoners have to keep pace up for. Also, it will probably blow your mind to learn this, but even marathon runners squat quite regularly (basically the equivalent for run…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 09:47 AM
1

Nice try, but Thompson seems to be a power-lifter She is, but you can bet your ass the ladies in question can push decent weight too, their jobs literally depend on it. I fail to see how a specialist powerlifting woman being able to bench 140Kg means a specialist fighter couldn't do 2/3's of that in the same weight class. not someone who has to balance muscular strength with muscular endurance. You say that like they don't specifically train both. On top of that, explosive movements (high power …
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:38 AM
1

TL;DR - The Bedschel Tech Test does not suit the design of out major product because the frameworks used don't even HAVE functions. Therefore we will redesign everything from the ground up to pass this useless metric for no real reason and absolutely no benefit, quite possibly to our detriment because... men are evil?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:53 AM
7

The Article mostly criticizes someone else, a fellow called McIntosh Thats because he writes her pieces. The prevailing theory is she is basically his puppet/public face (because feminists are sexist/racist/cis-phobic/hetero-phobic who would take a super privileged straight cis white male seriously about this stuff). He also makes a lot of public statements about this stuff saying exactly the same thing, so in effect they are essentially the same person. gendered insults are rarely used against …
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:31 AM
1

I get that a lot too (from NZ, fuck, shit and cunt etc. are used like punctuation here). Just tell them to stop using a few letters a flimsy excuse to derail a conversation and argue the fucking point.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:15 AM
1

Nigger is just a slang term for Negro, which just means black. What you say isn't important, it's WHY you say it. It's why we get upset when someone hillbilly says nigger, but black people call each other nigger all the time and nobody cares. We all know what the women mean in this case, it's a perfectly valid comparison.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:13 AM
5

Probably mixed, but the ring girl probably brings in more crowd than the female fighters to be honest. Thats why they get paid more. I can understand why the female fighters get pissed about it, they do WAY more work than the ring girl does most likely, definitely do on the night, but at the end of the day they just aren't nearly as impressive to watch as the male fighters are, especially for a male audience, and as a result they don't command the same value.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:07 AM
3

Guess what a woman with her physique benches? You sure about that? Jennifer Thompson is ~130lbs, competes raw. Leslie smith is a bit lighter at 125 but also has lower body fat. Now, Jennifer is one of the best Bench Pressers IN THE WORLD so it's not exactly a fair comparison, I would wager that Leslie can bench AT LEAST 135, quite probably closer to 225. Power movements with the arms like bench are probably staple training for her. Also, Shes a fucking professional UFC fighter, she has probably …
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:03 AM
5

Declare it sexist that men are not attracted to a corrisponding female body type The funniest part of the whole "dad-bod" thing is that what most "attractive" women posess is actually more or less the equivalent of it. The dad-bod is characterized by low muscle mass and moderate body fat levels, most "skinny" women have no muscle mass to speak of (the part that actually gives the body shape) and sit around 30% body fat (roughly equivalent to ~20% on men). The stuff they deem "average attractiven…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 11:46 PM
2

It's funny, but a lot of people don't realize that a dictator was originally a concept created in Rome, it was a democratically elected position that lasted for a set term and I believe not a single dictator ever failed to step down once their term ended. The point of it was that sometimes shit just NEEDS to get done, and you don't have time to sit around arguing about it or follow the rules to the letter.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:21 AM
2

Bonus points cause some are actually NZ specific which means they can't be dismissed due to being about a different population. Kapai bro.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:01 AM
3

I think they have been somewhat forced into it. Quite honestly the future for Japan is kinda bleak looking. Their population is rapidly aging and their excellent health care system means this old population sits in hospitals for years, if not DECADES sucking up money while not putting any back in. On top of that the birth rate is terrible so there is not much of a work force coming to replace all these retirees. The viable workers are burning out or killing themselves in droves too. Put all that…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:51 AM
1

I'm aware of what the Nazi's did, and as you pointed out, it was fudge a bunch of bad psuedo-science to satisfy an existing ideology. Which is exactly what I said racism is. In this case it was "I believe X, what bullshit stuff can I make up that appears to support it so I can justify my already existing position".
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:25 AM
1

Like I said though, it's a "soft" science, and probably incorrectly carried out to boot. They probably looked at it and saw "more niggers in prison" and concluded that that must be scientific evidence that "niggers are all criminals". Thats not how science works, more black people in prison only proves there are more black people in prison. It's the good old correlation != causation. Doesn't matter what they were trying to be, if they were wrong they are still wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:31 PM
1

'isms' are just ideological though processes surrounding a subject, there doesn't have to be anything scientific about it. Even when science does get mixed in with an 'ism' it's quite frequently a 'soft' science like sociology, and thus anything derived from it needs to be viewed with a mountain of salt. It's typically all biased assumptions taken from arbitrary stats and unverifiable hypothesis.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:24 AM
3

TL;DR - "You're ruining the echo, go use voat"
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:18 AM
1

I don't think it's racist if it's a fact. It's not racist to say people of African decent typically have higher rates of melanin production than people of European decent, it's just how it is. It's also not sexist to say men are typically stronger than women, because it's just plain true. Saying afro-americans make better basketballers than the white boys also makes sense, they have a higher concentration of fast twitch muscle fibers than white people tend to, which means they are better at powe…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:24 PM
3

Well, if the paternal leave is no longer than a vacation than why would they? If parental leave is no longer than a vacation then why aren't you using your annual leave for it? It's not like you didn't have 9 months of saving up leave and planning... And what is the point of taking a couple of weeks off anyway? Who looks after the kid then? Gonna dump it on your (probably still working) parents? Thats not fair to them or the child. Pay for care? Probably costs as much as the job anyway so fuck i…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:45 AM
2

Seriously. You seriously can't see how suffering these negative affects I listed constitutes suffering negative affects? I'm not arguing against men having the choice, I'm just saying it's obviously not a good one and it should be kinda obvious why. At first this may be the case, but as it becomes the norm it won't be Yes it will, why would an employer hire you when there is someone who hasn't had that break who is more current in their knowledge and experience? Especially if it's someone who ha…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:26 AM
10

IF they were then they would have quoted the studies, not articles from NYT and other random mags.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:11 AM
2

Seriously? When fucking off from work, having your knowledge fall out of currency and all the other negative affects of taking time off for parenthood is the primary reason for pay disparity between men and women you think men ALSO going through all that would be beneficial? Men taking equal parental leave just hamstrings their careers and earnings potential as well and then the whole family is financially worse off. Not to mention the fact there is a decently large likelihood the marriage will …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:33 AM
7

One thing I don't really see mentioned when people talk about the wage gap; How much of the money men earn ends up being gifted to a woman anyway? A large portion of the wage gap is made up simply of women who don't do as much work as men, yet I'd wager many of those women doing less work are receiving money from husbands at the same time. When thats taken to account I imagine women end up on the MUCH better off side of the equation. That sits in line with the research I remember reading about w…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:12 AM
6

Why would the media want to bring attention to a group dedicated to pointing out what a bunch of assholes the media are?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:01 AM
5

Probably not to anyone that doesn't already dislike them. Hardly anyone that should know about this will ever see it, and the few that do will simply fob it off by claiming some MRA did it to try and frame feminists or some shit.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:59 AM
2

That one hasn't been true for a long time, pixie cuts etc. have been all the rage for a while now, now it's "cute and playful".
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:49 AM
6

Nah, that does happen often enough, although it's usually a bit more specific (i.e. dyke/bull-dyke etc.)
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:48 AM
3

Actually, it is disputable. Many females are significantly more sensitive to light near the ultra-violet end of the spectrum. Pinks and purples appear much more intense and vibrant to them than they do to males as a result so they are typically more drawn to them. Simon Baron-Cohen (the brother of Sacha, the man behind Ali-G and Borat) is actually a world leading researcher on this topic and has found that male infants are also more attracted to "stereotypically male" toys and vice versa at poin…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 10:51 PM
1

I believe Athena would go in DC, not marvel. The greek god pantheon seems to go more with Wonder Womans crowd.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:03 AM
1

In this case though Thor is ACTUALLY his name. This isn't like when Robin put on the bat suit and became "Batman" when Bruce got Bane'd. She has actually take his very identity, who he is as a person, not just the abstract presentation of "Thor". Odinson is Thor's last name (lit- son of Odin).
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:02 AM
1

If OKCupids Dataclysm is to believed, then according to women 80% of us aren't... That probably has something to do with it too.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:18 AM
1

I get what you're saying. I don't think there is anything wrong with discussing things through a political lens either really. The only thing I take issue with is when people try to define what something means, like when feminists say that that something like "Bayonetta is about objectifying and demeaning women" when it REALLY clearly isn't. I do think the media is hammering the political stuff way too much these days though. I avoid pretty much all gaming sites these days.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:31 AM
1

I don't understand how anyone could be uncomfortable with JJBA, it's hilarious how they inject random imagery in it that allude to gay bodybuilding culture for no apparent reason. It's just a giant juxtaposition against the serious tone of the scenes that really drives home the camp.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:24 AM
13

It's not politics though, it's just an artist exploring a theme. It's no different from Exploring Samus' femininity in Other M, except that did a fucking horrible job of it and butchered the character. It's not telling anyone what to believe or anything like that, It's just saying "hey, heres this thing. It's a thing. Think what you want about it".
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:21 AM
8

If Gears of War had a Yaoi fandom you can bet this will have torrents of the stuff.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:14 AM
1

That graph is pretty vague but it looks like it's depicting wage per unit of production by date? It's pretty much impossible to read given the labeling and lack of context but I think it is entirely possible to interpret it that the amount men are paid per unit of production has decreased while womens is the same. This could just mean that the stuff men produce has become much more efficient to produce while womens hasn't, so it's not really at mens expense, just a naturally occurring phenomenon…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:19 AM
1

Not unless the professional trolls like paul henry start making it a hot button topic. We've had plenty of this shit anyway since forever, there is a reason we were the first self governing country to give women voting rights, why we have already had 2 female prime ministers (and IN A ROW) despite having so few female politicians, I mean, Helen Clark got appointed to the UN development Program as administrator because of a lot of her social justice politicking. The greens also have had a very st…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:57 AM
1

What difference is there between a sufficiently complex AI and a human/animal? We are just a mess of nurons instead of wires and neurotransmitters instead of software etc. really. What difference is there between something made on an automated assembly line and a person made by a bunch of automated biological processes in womb? Do people born from artificial wombs (likely to happen in the future) no longer qualify as human? People with designer DNA assembled from synthetic components (probably w…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:30 AM
3

Yes, if 9/10 victims are female and 1/10 victims are male then by encessity there must be 9x as many victims of rape that are female as there are male. If 1/6th of the male populations headcount are rape victims then by necessity 9/6ths of the male populations headcount must be victims. The only way this can make sense is if there almost twice as many women as men, but we know they are pretty much 50:50 so it's basically 9/6ths of all women are rape victims.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:01 AM
3

I assume 9/10ths of total lifetime victims being women means that 9x as many victims are women as men (i.e 9 women are raped for every man that is raped). If 1/6 men are raped by 18, that means AT LEAST 1/6 men are raped in their lives (assuming no man is ever raped after they turn 18, any that are would only increase the portion of men raped in their lifetime). If we assume that the population of men and women are equal (close enough) then 9 x 1/6 = 9/6, which is the number of women getting rap…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:35 AM
1

Why continue to sink money into something that you know is a lost cause? If she wants to make it clear she isn't worth dating don't pay her for it, just pay for what you ordered and half of anything shared, let her pay for the rest. And then tell her not to call you cause you wont be calling her.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:52 AM
2

I think the big difference between the objectification between men and women (and I only say objectification because it's common nomenclature, I don't actually like the term) is that with women, ANY woman will be openly "objectified" by men, where as with men, only the rich and famous are openly "objectified", a good looking regular guy might get commented on, but it will be in hushed whispers he probably wont hear so it doesn't "over inflate his ego". As a result any guy is just ecstatic to hav…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:50 AM
3

and cooking for 4 days at once for 4 isn't really different from cooking for 4 days for 1, although by that stage youd need some pretty big pots. Most people don't seem to be able to tolerate bulk cooking and eating the same thing every night either for some reason. Besides, I'm talking about in terms of work done, not material costs or pot size requirements, it's all much of the same amount of work, most of the investment goes into waiting for things to finish.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:34 AM
2

And don't forget they would have to do 80% of that work anyway if they were single. Cooking for 4 isn't really any different than cooking for 1, neither is washing unless it spreads over multiple loads etc., so they couldn't reasonably claim that as a cost they should be reimbursed for.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:45 AM
8

Take a "toilet break" Don't, it just gives her an apparent legitimacy to her delusions that you did something wrong. Just go up and pay for your meal and half of anything shared, the end. If the staff complain just say "what, I didn't eat what she ordered, thats her problem, not mine".
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:43 AM
6

Pay for yourself without a second thought. If it's a big deal to him then he will stop you and pay himself. Just do this every date unless a specific guy shows an extreme pattern, although honestly if a guy insists on paying every single time I'd find that a little creepy tbh.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:41 AM
25

More importantly, guys, raise your hands if any of the women you date did do all that and you would have actually given a fuck if they didn't. yea, thats what I thought.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:35 AM
2

Well they are in for a shock when the bill comes and I just sit there looking at them expectantly.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:35 AM
8

It's funny because reality depicts the exact opposite of the picture the author is sarcastically trying to paint. If you go onto /r/fitness and look at the victory sunday and similar posts the vast majority of them are things like "A girl actually grabbed my ass and felt up my chest, holy shit it was so amazing I feel like an actual human being with value now", a far cry from the "now men see how terrible it is too" picture she tries to paint. Though you have to be pretty fucking downtrodden to …
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:24 AM
1

That feminist is wearing a shirt that objectifies men! I don't know what clearer proof we need that third wave feminism is exceedingly misandrist and oppressive to men /s I think it's a shirt anyway... it looks more like a body pillow that has arm holes cut into it...
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:35 AM
1

Downvotes are probably because what you are proposing would likely be considered brigading, which is against the rules of reddit. We already have to walk on egg shells because of lopsided treatment from admins and mods around the site, can't really afford to give them more excuses.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:32 AM
2

Maybe we need our own Anita, someone proactive going out there and spreading the truth It will be a long time before we see that happen. People don't care for the truth and it's a lot less marketable. It's going to take years of grass roots stirring up downtrodden men and carefully finding sympathizers to spread the notion before we could pull off something like Anita's media pretense. She does well because she packages up what people want to hear nicely, to do the same we need to generate that …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:29 AM
3

I think what /u/rrearleii is getting at is that one of the biggest criticisms of the MRM is that we don't care about mens rights, just bashing feminists. By posting this content with a highly aggressive and anti-feminst title you are just pandering to that negative stereotype. Why not title it "Watch this blonde ANNIHILATE the notion that men are privileged and have no issues in need of addressing". Attacking a group is a low effort ad hominem argument that is easily dismissed or countered becau…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:21 AM
1

Yea, I thought about what would happen if I won the lottery here in NZ, but at the end of the day it's usually only ~4-8million. Sounds like a lot if you don't have it, but you would probably still need to work to have a nice lifestyle with that. You would get a house freehold, a nice car and furniture etc., but then it's kinda gone and you need to earn more. You really need to hit the 10's of millions to become self sufficient and be at the point where everything is at "doesn't matter anymore" …
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:59 AM
1

Ah, so it's not just income tax but all taxes, that makes it not as bad then, although still surprisingly offset. That benefit to earnings picture is a bit closer to what I was expecting to see. Still a pretty depressing outlook no matter which way you slice it though, unless you manage to break into the top bracket your basically grinding for the rest of your life for no real reward. I'm surprised more people don't just say "fuck it", move to the country and s tart their own personal self susta…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:31 PM
1

Am I reading that second chart right? The No HS group basically get ~30k + their income after tax + benefits and the Grad Group gets their income - 30K after tax + benefits? So on average a grad needs to earn 60K MORE than someone with WHO NEVER EVEN FINISHED HIGHSCHOOL just to do better than the drop out? If we assume the average HS dropout earns 20k that means the average grad needs to earn 80k just to have the same total income... When earning 20k and 80k amounts to the same shit no wonder th…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:51 PM
1

And what does "legally competent" even mean? That thier decisions cannot be taken as legally binding. Why not? Because for some reason they are not considered mentally competent enough to make an properly reasoned and informed decision. In the case of teens it's because they have not yet achieved a fully developed brain (i.e. have not yet developed full mental competence tot he point they can be held responsible for their actions), specifically in the regions responsible for impulse control, som…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:48 AM
1

so far I've been the only person I know of who has it It's definately more common than you'd think, I've seen it uttered a few times. Mirror's Edge got bitched at for being "weird" and "simple" - because it focused on doing one thing well Yea, it wasn't perfect with it's semi-lock on stuff, but ME was pretty good in the controls department. It scares me they have Anita Sarkeesian consulting with them and telling them the controls are too hard and they need to be dumbed down so women can play vid…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:10 AM
2

Don't need to take my word for it, that link I posted was from the guy who made Voat (formerly known as "Whoaverse"). They are being perfectly open about everything and straight up said Voat is in alpha. Voat was always supposed to be an open clone of reddit with a bunch of the nice features from RES built in and a layer of enforced transparency to prevent abuse from moderators etc. from being hidden. Now that reddit is hitting critical mass and falling over I suspect Voat will be the new Reddit…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:05 AM
3

nope, 2:3 means for every 2 men there are 3 women, and 3 is 50% more than 2 (2x150%=3). If it was 33% it would be 2:2.66.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:52 AM
5

The post was made on /v/antigamergate, obviously thats going to be a shitfest of dodgy mods. The difference with Voat is that that moderators deletion is going to be publicly disclosed on https://voat.co/v/subnamehere/modlog/deleted as per this. Obviously it's not 100% up yet, but don't forget Voat is under development still.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:10 AM
1

Nah, a hell of a lot of "gamers" love the whole press "A" to "awesome" design of quicktime event/cutscene heavy games. Why be good at a game when you can just sit there mashing a button and cool shit happens and you can claim you did that? Just look at how much people love the free running in assassins creed (hold a button and push the stick where you want to go and it happens by magic) vs what happens when you plop them down with the endless possibilities of a Defrag map. Publishers only love t…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:46 PM
3

It is. 60% means out of 100 there are 60 women and 40 men. 60/40 =1.5 i.e. 150% i.e. 50% more than the number of men. For verification, 50% of 40 is 20. 40+20 = 60, the number of women, like /u/ojerto3 said. So yes, it is 50% more women than men getting tertiary qualification. The only way to get 33% is 1-(40/60), 40/60 is the ratio of men to women, 1 is... I dunno? the number we pulled out of our ass to make the maths convenient? The ratio of men to women is 40/60, or 2/3. What is the the inver…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:24 PM
1

I don't see how that necessarily negates what I said, just that the original law was probably an extension of existing rape laws which typically exclude men anyway and feminists got that corrected by accident by making stupid anti-male arguments (nothing new there either).
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:12 PM
5

Sometimes, but it's hard to prove and by the same logic they should also be allowed to vote and smoke and numerous other things. How do you judge something like that on a case by case basis though? It's simply not feasible. You would basically need to go through a statutory rape charge worth of court activities to prove it wouldn't be if you did fuck before you even fuck. This is just an inherent weakness in written legal systems, they have to be enforced as written or they are kind of useless, …
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:11 AM
6

Probably very, very few. But that is also irrelevant to statutory rape. The whole reason we have statutory rape laws is because minors are not considered mentally competent to make decisions about things like this. Regardless of if the boy physically consented or not, he is not legally able to consent and thus the teacher could not accept that consent, so she still committed statutory rape. If the Judge is not aware of this then they should be removed from their position because they are obvious…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:27 AM
0

Yea, I actually gave this video an upvote in /r/games. It was pretty much entirely reasonable and exactly what I've always said she should be doing if she wants to make a positive difference. Of course it's not coincidental that her calling this a good example actually clashes with her thesis. Her very first point int he video was that it's good because it shows women can do stereotypically male tasks, but in her thesis she claims having women do male tasks to be positively portrayed is sexist a…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:23 AM
1

I actually typically pick female characters in RPG's because they get bonus flirty dialog that male ones tend not to get which makes things easier and there are 0 downsides to this choice (except in Arcanum, fuck Arcanum was an awesome RPG system). On a sadder note, I did this because female privilege was obvious to me since I was like 5 :\
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:17 AM
5

C'mon, your gona list all those but not Jade from Beyond Good and Evil? She's probably the second best female character in gaming (April Ryan gets first from me, at least you got her).
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:13 AM
2

BUT THERE WERE NO SQUIGGLY RED LINES D:
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:19 AM
4

Eh, while I agree it's probably not all that appropriate for a large public facing PR device like Twitter, the actual existence of the image it's self doesn't particularly bother me. Is a bit hypocritical sporting that while pandering to SJW/feminist complaints about sexualisation of female characters though.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:05 AM
1

I say this every time and its still true, games will always have this problem because the demographic of its typical userbase gives undue prominenance on nonsense bullshit SJW issues. I completely disagree. Gaming culture has taken the exact opposite position, nobody tolerates SJW bullshit and nobody wants to hear it. Any post on the topic in /r/Games gets downvoted into oblivion instantly because of it (even though occasionally there are actually GOOD posts on the topic). The gaming MEDIA on th…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:33 AM
1

Or we could just go watch the 5th gear. Tiff is a great driver and actually knows what he's talking about with cars (Jermy Clarkson talks a lot of shit and frequently contradicts himself however and sensationalizes everything). It also has a female host to keep feminists happy (and Vicki is pretty competent at the whole car reviewing thing too).
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:06 AM
3

They have had a fairly large following and a lot of support inside the gamer community (ignoring people already on the fuck the menz side by default and the media who are the actual target of GG). It's also had quite a bit of success in terms of pressuring sponsors to withdraw advertising from sites that post bigoted material (such as Kotaku) as well as getting several large gaming sites to start marking placed advertising and affiliate links. I mean, they were never going to get positive media …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:08 AM
3

Sure you can, it's easy. You just admit/hire every woman that applies and only admit/hire (or alternatively fire the surplus of) enough men to make it 50:50. I mean, sure that will destroy the economic viability of your institute and sure nobody will want to hire half your grads who are only likely there based on having vaginas, further limiting your applicant pool and therefore income, but hey, EQUALITY!!! AMIRIGHT GUYZ!!?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:56 AM
6

Typical political poll, never any middle ground, just strong/weak left/right answers. Where is my "Both your notions are retarded!" option? It was mostly just Yay corporations! vs. Yay walfare! i.e "The prime function of schooling should be to equip the future generation to find jobs." Well, no... it should be about increasing knowledge and capability of the entire human race so we can continue to improve the quality of everyones lives, but lets face it, in the current world if we just went with…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:12 AM
2

Lawyer is probably perfectly informed and trying to game public opinion (and therefore the jurors indirectly) by making it sound like it's an unreasonable charge.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:56 AM
3

Kinda sounds to me like they are complaining about having priced themselves out of the market by artificially inflating their own worth to the point where many men are simply too "poor" to afford it and just go to free but "illicit" sources. Kinda like with the media industry and piracy.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:59 AM
3

Bro, shoulda lawyered his ass for assault, coulda been a millionaire. Seriously though, how does someone like that get to be a teacher? You don't punch them and leave them to continue doing what clearly isn't working, you give em a pat on the back, say "too fucking right son, lets get your brain swole!" and show them how to get shit done. 5x5 polynomial equation solving followed by sets of algebra to failure.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:29 AM
0

I didn't take OP to be talking about disadvantage of white people at all. It looks to me like it was just a juxtaposition of the supposed virtual immunity of white males from anything bad and womens oppression against the reality of incarceration rates. If OP said black men then any feminist reading it, instead of being faced with their own hypocrisy would have instead simply said "well of course, black people are oppressed by evil white men". Bringing black men into it would simply have destroy…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:50 AM
2

125 million active steam accounts... If you wanna make a point, might as well use the impressive numbers :p EDIT: woops, fixed np link.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:25 AM
1

But thats my point, outside of clear fetishes for significant genetic aberrations and the like, something as mundane as simply being 5'6" is considered a HUGE negative point. Hell, I'm taller than average at 5'10" and I'm still considered a "manlet" by many women. Men don't even begin until 6 ft according to them. If you are really short, like 5'3" as a guy... your pretty boned as a guy unless you have a great personality and a wallet to match etc., otherwise you are stuck scraping the "she's on…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:59 AM
1

Try googling "bad dragon", preferably while there are no people around to judge you or bosses to fire you... it just a toung in cheek way of saying I've seen women professing being into some really weird shit, but never any into the mundane "negative" features of men. It's kinda messed up that I've seen more women list "willing to take a dump on my face" as a desirable trait in a man than "is under 6ft tall". It kind of ties in with what /u/AloysiusC was saying, just something as simple as being…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 11:45 AM
1

And yet when I examine reality to determine the validity of what is self evident, I find more examples of women being into the idea of fucking anthropomorphic animals that I do fucking short guys... I mean, who wouldn't want to fuck horse man, so long as he's not a Shetland...
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:21 AM
6

My experience of being asked out zero times is typical (I believe) for a (heterosexual) man of my age Nearly 30 here, decided one night I was tired of doing all the work and assuming all the risk in courtship so I'd just go out with the next chick that asked., it was like the Atlantic turned into the sahara overnight. I'm probably better than average looking too (especially now that I've got in shape). Been like 7 or 8 years since my last date. On the other hand I've had female friends complain …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:04 AM
6

To be fair, cattle are treated pretty fucking well in India.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:41 AM
10

In the same thread, somebody states flat out that a 20% difference in university admittance wasn't an issue. It's even stupider than that, it's a difference of 20 in magnitude, but it's actually a 50% difference (60 is 150% of 40). Another 10% either way and it will be over 100%... Thats scheduled for what, 2030 with the current trends?
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:21 AM
1

Your reply is simply a long, unstructured rant of all men's problems, not a focused response. Most of it is not relevant. I will only reply to what is. Actually, it is particularly focused. Firstly I provide a list of non-choices men have about the things you claim they chose to go for (because they have no other option basically). Everything later is an example of choices women get that men don't. Regarding war veterans (which is relevant when speaking about suicides): Men choose to go to war, …
/r/MensRights20/02/15 10:42 AM
3

Yea, and I'm sure they choose to get poor to no support from the govt. that manipulated them into signing up for a stupid war so they could go get a limb blown off, meanwhile money is being thrown at cheap/free birth control for women. I'm sure they chose to have more money than they can even possibly pay to be legally confiscated for them to pay their wife who divorced them cause she was bored, took the kids (who they aren't even allowed to see any more) leaving them with nothing but the prospe…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:47 AM
7

I admit I've not really paid any attention to Wu given I'm interested in ACTUAL Gamergate, not make believe fantasy land Gamergate, but if she is anything like I suspect she is (i.e. spouting the exact same crap every other SJW/Feminist involved in videogaming does) then all I can say is: 0_0 That was TOO perfect... I think they becoming self aware...
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:18 AM
3

Regardless of everything else you said in there... every man who commits suicide have chosen to do so himself How incredibly shit do all the things outside of his control have to be for that to seem like an even remotely appealing choice? Comparing this to the wage gap is completely false equivalence. Women chose not to earn as much because they have other appealing options, if anything that is a GOOD thing for them. Men choose to kill themselves because that is the ONLY appealing option. That i…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:10 AM
1

Trust in Brodin, the all-spotter will surely provide you with the gainz necessary to have a a pants shitting avoiding 1rm for sphincter clenches. My deads actually felt really good yesterday, his swoliness works in mysterious ways.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:13 AM
1

Sorry, it's late and I typed it in a hurry, plus I've had food poisoning all day :( Damn Broki, trying to make me shit away mah gainz. Fortunately Brodin has blessed me with a swole sphincter. Managed to finish my deadlift set without shitting myself. Seriously, don't deadlift with food poisoning unless you feel like testing your luck, it can get messy very easy when you have to squeeze your core like that every rep. The Valsalva maneuver is the perfect simulation of pushin out a stubborn turd.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:32 AM
1

What does anyone think of anything? Ask 2 people and you get two answers. Some consider it nothing but a tool Brodin has gifted us to bring us closer to his swolieness, others think it a tool of Broki that prey on our impatience and hubris and will cripple us later in life with his gainz robbing poison. Everyone interprets Brodins teachings a little differently, and who is to say who is right or wrong? No one program gives two people the same gainz. I myself have no qualms with those who choose …
/r/MensRights16/02/15 08:04 AM
1

I do, and even for those yet to tread the iron path as well, though Broki may have led them astray.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:23 AM
3

It started off simply as a parody sub poking fun at the sillyness of a lot of complaints on /r/bodyacceptance (ironically though, it actually often has legit posts that are just as, if not more reasonable than the stuff on ba), and it kinda evolved into a silly fun place to make jokes and talk about fitness related stuff in a light hearted and humorous manner. It really does have one of the most accepting and friendly communities out there though. For example a member came out as trans there rec…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 07:58 AM
2

You get booted from parliament for abuse of parliamentary privilege. You would probably get a warning from the speaker of the house first though. At least, thats what happens with this kind of crap here in NZ, and assuming the current speaker isn't as ineffectual as a piece of wet toilet paper.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:35 PM
1

Don't know why they would. If you believe the rhetoric then pursuing stem subjects means that you will be ridiculed and failed for having a vagina, constantly sexually harrassed, passed over for promotions, have a dead end career where you will be treated like shit and probably get raped and/or murdered by a coworker. Why the fuck would any woman want that? No wonder they are staying the fuck away from it. I suspect the issue with the lack of female gamers is a similar situation.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:26 PM
12

Brother, that is like saying you have gotten too big! I think you have not been spending enough time if anything. Sometimes I wonder why anyone would go anywhere else. /r/swoleacceptance is honestly one of the most accepting and kind communities on the web, nobody cares if your black or white, man or woman, straight or gay, trans or cis, all you need is to not be an asshole and be willing to embrace your inner swole so that one day your outer may match it. Praise Brodin brother! May your iron be…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:54 PM
1

I agree, things as silly as manspreading should be met with mockery instead of serious replies to avoid giving them legitimacy. I also agree hypocrisy over issues like this should be discussed, although it should be taken as more of a "it's silly to think that fat women NEED to be viewed as beautiful" than the more typical "if you think this is okay then you have to accept that fat men should be represented too". I don't think myself it's so much that it should be "sat out" of, more that it can …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:13 AM
1

Don't get me wrong, I'm not particularly bothered by this. Ads pandering to demographics is just companies trying to make money, they aren't making any statements or anything by it, there is no malicious intent. They are free to do what they like and it doesn't bother me (I'm still not going to be particularly attracted to fat girls either way). I'm just saying the ESPN cover with Prince Fielder on it isn't really comparable to having a plus sized model on a Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:51 AM
2

What are you a second hand English speaker? Whats a second hand English? Is that like some thing you buy in a pawn shop? Or do you mean the speaker is second hand? Didn't know there was still a thriving used slave market these days, thought that kinda shit had been abolished. Or maybe I'm just to stupid to comprehend you superior written prose. and your understanding of what I was saying is almost even worse So instead of insulting me explain yourself so I can better understand. Cause at the mom…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:28 AM
3

Not sure this is really a reasonable comparison. This ESPN issue was about variance in the bodies of athletic competitors across different sports and had a very wide variety on show. It was about the study of the form of the athlete, not about how sexually appealing they were. It was actually pretty interesting sing the difference in builds and picking out how they relate to their respective sports. On the other hand, SI swimsuit edition is about boobies.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:05 AM
2

I never said it wasn't understandable ... What. The. Fuck. Are. You. Trying. To. Fucking. Say!? Sorry, I guess technically it was only very strongly implied through singifficantly worse use of the english language. it's just absolute shit and requires being read like 6 times The other guy understood it fine... maybe YOU need to read it 6 times but everyone else seems to have got it fine. I backed it up By claiming the positioning of "generally" is relevant (which it is not in the English languag…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:02 AM
2

I never said my writing was brilliant, in fact I inferred that it probably was pretty average. All I questioned was that it was not understandable. You still haven't demonstrated in any way how it is unclear what I was trying to say... As for telling me to fuck off, you started this shit matey, don't get angry with me when you can't back it up.If you didn't want to have this discussion then you shoulda just kept your mouth shut.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:32 AM
2

That doesn't make sense. Your argument is that these are examples of why what I wrote was bad... if it isn't then they are irrelevant to your argument and you have yet to actually demonstrate that your argument is valid in any way. So yes, you ARE literally arguing those points are bad, but as I pointed out, most of them are not even relevant to what I wrote, they only demonstrate your failure at basic reading comprehension. The one point you make (well, actually, you didn't, I made it for you) …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:05 AM
2

Because you should care about how people perceive you and how you communicate with the world? Do you have a BA or a GED? How I present myself to random people on the internet who have no idea who I am and Who I will likely never have anything to do with and how I present myself to people in the real world, especially in a professional environment are VERY different things. If I am trying to foster a professional relationship I care about how the other person percieves me. If I am conversing with…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:10 AM
5

In all the time it took you to reply you could have offered some corrections instead and then we both could have benefited, but instead you chose to be a dick about it while not offering anything of value. Besides, as I already pointed out, you are the one that cares about it, not me, why would I waste time correcting something that doesn't need correcting from my point of view?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:42 AM
3

I actually disagree with their assertion that the typical male image has grown in mass significantly, it's just dropped in body fat significantly. A guy with a good physique used to sit comfortably around 12-15% body fat, perfectly healthy and easily attainable. Muscle mass certainly was higher than average still, but it was an idealized physique after all. These days though women expect visible abs etc., and want men walking around at 6-10% body fat. 10% is attainable with a lot of work to main…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:40 AM
6

lol, it's the internet buddy, who cares if I dot all the i's and cross all the t's? I'm making offhand comments in my spare time, not writing essays for publication. Your pronouns are all fucked up and undeclared It's English buddy, the subjects are inferred as often as they are declared, it's a vague and stupid language, get used to it. Clearly every instance of they/them that follows on from "mens" relates to men until the very obvious subject change when I start talking about women at which p…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:21 AM
5

Exactly what I said? I do find it amusing, though, that mens desires are generally to be better than they [currently] are while womens [desires] tend to be that everyone else over-values them instead of them raising their own value. There, reformatted and editorialized. Better?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:49 PM
6

Well, yea, what woman wants a fat dude? This marketing is clearly aimed at women so it's to be expected, just pandering to the audiences desires. I do find it amusing though that mens desires are generally to be better than they are, while womens tend to be that everyone else over-values them instead of them raising their own value.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:26 PM
1

Ian Deserves it, he's a pretty cool dude. He actually claims he doesn't like being called "Sir" because he doesn't want to be viewed as being "better" than other people. Also, he apparently said If you've got Mystique as your girlfriend the fun you could have in bed - I've just imagined X-Men 3 might open with me in bed with Patrick Stewart. Dude has a sense of humor and is far from the conservative stiff most people his age are. Many of those royal Shakespearian actors are actually really cool …
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:34 AM
1

Japan isn't anti-gay as far as I am aware. Sure they bundle it in over the top sterotypes (this guy is quite a popular comedian over there), but they do that with everything. They might treat it as an oddity, but statistically speaking it is. The biggest beef they have with it is that it lowers the birth rate, but thats because they have a huge issue with that at the moment. Historically male homosexuality was actually extremely glorified. The Samurai were gay as fuck and it's the source of some…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:44 PM
13

If a girl ever asks me to buy her a drink in a bar I reply with "only if you buy me one first". It's a good filter for undesirable women.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:13 AM
1

I believe a good deal of it is not manufactured. I also believe a lot of it comes from dumb little kids who don't even mean what they say, they are just power tripping on the fact that can say naughty words and not only do they not get punished, they even get attention for it from someone famous. I believe she doesn't deserve to be harassed, but at the same time I also believe she shouldn't care that she is with this kind of shit. It's meaningless and nothing out of the ordinary for anyone with …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:30 AM
2

I don't really feel the whole "male space" vs "female space" is something in need of special non-obvious definitions. It's a community where the vast majority of people in it are male really, or female for female spaces. You are correct though, male dominated spaces do appear hostile to women because in general men expect other people to earn respect, it's not something given automatically etc. As for fem shep, Mark Meer did a good enough job of manShep, but Hale is just fucfking awesome, it's h…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:38 AM
8

Depends on your definition of "gaming". If you take it to mean the AAA gaming scene as it is always presented by feminists to mean... Then No, nowhere near 50% women. There are no good estimates but I think 10-15% is a pretty good educated guess. Take Mass Effect for example, it's a single player Action-RPG (I use the term RPG VERY loosely here...) where you can chose the gender of your avatar. 18% of people that played the game chose female. And that number is highly inflated by the fact that J…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:05 AM
2

Would you label a feminist that fights for men's rights an MRA? Yup Would you label an MRA that fights for women’s rights a feminist? Nope. A Womans Rights Advocate. Feminism quite often deals as much with womans wants as their rights and also injects a high degree of poorly constructed and intellectually bankrupt philosophy into things. It's possible to be an advocate of womens rights (which all but a few MRA's likely are) and not buy into the extra BS that feminism brings. Does labeling yourse…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:28 AM
-1

The lack of a Y chromosome defines you as female in most peoples eyes I would imagine, but there seem to be pretty diverse views here about the "man" part, pretty 50/50 from what I've seen. If you actually look up the word gender it's derived from a French word which is basically the same as the Latin "genus", so it is in fact a reference to your genetic classification (which would be male in this case). The idea that Gender represents some abstract and malleable social construct is only an obtu…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:39 PM
1

If by "shame" you mean they say "lol dude, you need to get laid. Lets go get you some pussy" and then spend the night hanging out with you and teaching you what they know about interacting with women and other such encouraging and social behavior. I mean, guys have a social system built around exactly this, it's called being a wingman.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:41 AM
2

When I walk down the street I always see groups of women walking 3-4 abreast taking the entire sidewalk and they NEVER more out of the way. I usually have to take refuge behind a shop sign and stop and wait for them to pass because they seem to be the only object which they acknowledge will not make way for them.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 09:37 AM
2

Are you a troll? I'm thinking you are. Nah, they just aren't very good at applying logic and reason emotionally. They decided I was a racist purely based on the fact I thought cops should have been minding a group of overtly racist and aggressive people who were literally trying to incite violence in almost every random passer by simply because that group was black. They also proceeded to try and nitpick a bunch of tangential statements and completely ignore when I demonstrated I was correct by …
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:25 PM
3

Your views your thoughts are not yours alone..By allowing yourself to be belittled you illicit a defensive reaction from observers who identifies with a similar point of view as yours. Allow yourself to be rhetorically crucified, do not defend yourself.. That would work, if 99% of people weren't spineless cowards who simply follow "popular opinion" to fit in. If you let them make fun of you then people will just think "oh, this is a bad opinion to hold, I better take the opposite side before I g…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:58 PM
1

Which is actually a funny result of their fear of showing penises. They couldn't have penises in their animated porn so they improvised and made them tentacles. Naturally though virtually nobody actually wants to get fucked by a tentacle (cause that would be kinda weird) so they kinda HAD to make it rape scenes or it would seem absurd (er). The rape part is pretty incidental. And rape isn't really very common in games as far as I know (well, hentai is pretty niche really too tbh).
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:07 AM
3

If it's thematically similar to the first game then it's even giving you shit for enjoying it's content anyway, so it's not like it was being depicted in a positive light or anything. As for Japan, yea, she would have a field day with all the low effort stuff to bitch about. She would completely miss stuff like the fact that female oriented comics are quite common there because women actually participate in the medium.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:39 PM
6

It's actually kinda tricky to refute this Not really, just respond with: "So you are saying that someone should get time off the rape charge for murdering the person afterwards because that is objectively better due to the reduced suffering of the person?" It's a stupid argument, at least when your alive you have the opportunity to get over it and have a good life. Murder doesn't afford you that luxury. I'm pretty sure the vast majority of rape victims would prefer to be alive and raped than dea…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:18 PM
1

Clearly these complainers like Anita don't hold the same standards for books or movies or TV Actually, thats all she was bitching about before games. Games are just the new cool thing to bitch about.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:15 PM
6

It's not even an actual rape, immediately after it happens the lighting comes on, the camera pulls out and the director calls cut, it's a depiction of a porno depicting a rape being filmed. The creator just doesn't make it immediately obvious. Also, pedant mode on here but this isn't really a mainstream game.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:08 PM
2

I should hope so, otherwise it would prove that maths trivialises the oppression of mixed PoC's by reducing their niggerness (n2 < 2n for values of n less than 2), and that would make math a tool of the patriarchy and inherently misogynistic.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:01 PM
1

Thanks buddy, I gave up after unblocking the 5th script and still not getting anything. The number of random scripts running on sites is just plain retarded these days.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:11 AM
1

Hard Candy isn't even a revenge movie, the girl was just going full vigilante-mode. She reckoned the photographer was responsible for some crime she didn't have anything to do with as far as I can remember and she had no proof of it, but set out to punish him for it anyway. She basically embodies the SJW mentality but then they basically butcher the ending to satisfy viewers who would be watching it with that same mentality.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:34 AM
1

Reminds me of Hard Candy, except instead of leaving some moral ambiguity about the girls actions (tricks a guy into taking her home, then drugs him, ties him up, tortures him and makes him hang himself because she "thinks" he's a peado) they go ahead and cop out at the end and make him confess because we couldn't have innocent young girls doing things that are actually morally reprehensible (cause it's okay to kill someone if they a bad of course).
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:16 AM
1

I've encountered women at the gym that worry about not wanting to get too big. Never heard that from a guy. Actually, it's quite common with men too these days, I see it a fair amount on /r/Fitness. It seems especially popular with the kids these days, they all wanna be ottermode so they can be cool like Justin's Beaver or whatever his name is. They all say they want to be "toned", not bulky these days like if they step in a gym they might accidentally Arnold. EDIT: It's even been around since t…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 08:54 AM
4

Haha, wow, so much fat logic in there. So what if your TDEE is 1500 and a guys is 2200? If you are both eating maintenance then you are both going to experience the same hunger levels and it will be about the same effort. In both cases if you don't already look like that then you will need to eat a deficit to lose the fat, the only difference is that the woman might have to take it a bit slower than the man because her BMR will be closer to her TDEE due to lack of muscle mass, but at the end of …
/r/MensRights10/01/15 10:31 PM
2

nah bro, it's cause they are bad for your knees /s
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:35 PM
2

Oh totally, thats why we all look like Jeff Seid, cause I mean, who even has to try to be sub 10% body fat (certainly no more than about 12-13%) and carry enough lean mass at the same time to put them in the "obese" BMI category at the same time. It's not like we have to win the genetic lottery and be 6ft+ (probably about 20% of the population), spend enough time devoted to hitting the gym and watching your macros that people make fun of you and claim your begin obsessive about it (/r/swoleaccep…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:26 PM
1

Well that is disappointing. If only AMD didn't get absolutely destroyed in the CPU space :( Oh well, by the time I need a new rig their new uArch will be out and hopefully they will be competitive. Coincidentally, AMD recently got a new CEO, she is a damn smart lady (she worked on many iterations of the PowerPC architecture, which was pretty good for a long time) and is already showing good signs of turning AMD around. If you want to promote diversity in tech, show women like her who are actuall…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:15 AM
1

And as consumers it is up to us to shape the market for our benefit, if we don't present a strong voice it will leave us for greener pastures because they quite frankly give 0 fucks about our interests, just our dollars. It's important we exercise our only power that benefits us in the market place.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:08 AM
1

I had an [email protected], I moved to an i5 4690 @ 4GHz and changed nothing else (except mobo) in the system, made a HUGE difference. I used to get 60-110 fps in Tribes: Ascend on a custom ultra low config, now I get 100-150fps on a custom high config with some minor visibility tweaks (and dips sub 120 are extremely rare and basically only on bugged geometry in certain maps * cough arx *). Pretty much every other UE3 engine game got a signifficant boost, as did several other games like BF3/4 and C…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:07 AM
3

The worst part was there was only a single other post in the sub at the time about the kickstarter (3 months earlier from memory, when it was first announced) and 1 of the two replies I remember getting was essentially "this isn't appropriate to this sub, it's already been mentioned on /r/gaming and people who care can talk about it there". Admittedly I wasn't exactly pandering with my "put your money where your mouth is" tone, but the results seem to indicate it was fairly justified. For refere…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:30 AM
4

I would just answer with "they don't according to actual women" and quote this result from OKCupid.com's data analysis. Whats REALLY bad though is that not only are 80% of men rated at below 2.5/5 attractiveness, the most common rating appears to be a 1/5. So yea, society doesn't tell men they look bad without makeup, it just tells men they look bad period.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 12:31 AM
8

They're happy because a company finally made a male character who wears "sexy armor" that doesn't cover anything and makes no sense Yup, cause thats certainly not something in asian RPG's. I mean, just look at that "come hither" look on Baltheir's face. Totally for the straight white guys. EDIT: Forgot the punchline.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:56 PM
8

Eh, I went on there once to pimp the kickstarter for Dreamfall: Chapters (pretty much exactly what feminists claim is the game women want but never gets made). They didn't give a fuck about it cause they were all too busy ogling a photo gallery of some male model in his underwear pretending to be nerdy.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:44 PM
1

I had already addressed any relevant point you made in previous posts. You would know that if you had read them. And you argument that "laws are complex so you probably can't understand them" (which you offered without ever bothering to provide any evidence of how you are correct) applies equally to you so it doesn't really count for much (unless you claim to be a lawyer, preferably with expertise on the subject). I mean, I quoted the US sections of wikipedia yet you are acting like I never cons…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:36 AM
1

Actually, I haven't backed away from that. I was unsure before, but I'm pretty confident now that my statement was reasonable. I've already cited the specific laws and precedents which justify it, but you have conveniently chosen to ignore those. Feel free to come back when you have considered them. Considering to justify your position you need to argue that calling someone a racketeer and a fascist is worse than yelling "go cook a dog" at an asian or claiming someone is going to die and their d…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:24 AM
0

so they deserve nothing if they broke no law. Given this, you still attack them, and you obviously have no idea about our laws here. They were assholes, so they deserve to be called assholes. It's pretty straight forward. Seeing as you seem to be of the opinion that "free speech" means you cannot criticize someone for what they say... I am confused why you seem to be making a special exception just for me? By trying to paint the Black men as dangerous. Again... where? I said they were being over…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:55 AM
1

It's easy to say that, but you didn't say much about the white woman who actually broke the law. I didn't need to because she was hauled off in a cop car? What do you want me to say? She got what she deserved, nothing else needs to be done. but there seems to be a lot of passive racism in what you say and how you say it. Where? I don't think I brought up race anywhere except when I was using it as an identifier (i.e. calling the guy with the frying pan "the asian dude") which is hardly racist. I…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:14 AM
2

This is dangerously close to racism by you. How? Their race has absolutely nothing to do with it. I'm judging them purely on their behaviour. I don't give a fuck what the colour of their skin is, I would have said exactly the same thing if they were white, or asian, or middle eastern, or anything else. It's actually quite common to try and paint Black people as dangerous. I don't see how that has any relevance to what I was saying? Or are you claiming that black people should never have anything…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:46 AM
2

It was a peaceful protest for the most part until she became physical Watch the other video brah, "peaceful" is NOT how I would describe it. They were essentially standing on the roadside trying to pick fights with everyone, and nearly managed to goad an asian guy into violence by yelling at him to go cook some dogs etc. (he was carrying some pans, probably just bought them), not to mention all the "fuck white people" crap they were spouting. I mean, these guys are basically the westboro baptist…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:36 AM
1

And forcing the men to disband when they had not broken the law would be unconstitutional because they have every right to free speech I dunno if you watched the other video, but I'm pretty sure some of the stuff they were doing would be dangerously close to something illegal. They were going out of their away to verbally abuse people and throw racial slurs etc. The cops would not have been unreasonable to leave a couple of guys to watch them to make sure nothing got out of hand (they managed to…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:28 AM
3

Clearly she was a nutbag but those guys were kinda being assholes too. They shover her when a gentle push and verbal warning would have been far more appropriate and they certainly didn't need to bring race into it when it clearly wasn't the issue. Mind you, looking at the other video linked, they call themselves the "racist street preachers" and they certainly live up the name. By the looks of that video they probably should have been arrested too, or at the least ordered to disband. EDIT: In f…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:07 AM
2

All good. Thankfully it's a mistake that you only tend to make once. I swear I see it happen like every single day though.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:20 PM
1

Thats not for having a medical condition, it's for not being able to do the job, which is a secondary characteristic. If you advertised for a hand modeling job and said "no thalidomide babies" then you would get sued. If you rejected applicants for their unsuitability because they don't have hands to model then thats fine. Sure it's a BS semantics argument, but thats exactly what laws are, and the weakness of judging things based on laws "as they are written" instead of intent.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:15 PM
3

Something something patriarchy something forced to stay home and rear children so can't work something rape something something Q.E.D it's all mens fault.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:11 PM
3

Just a guess, you tried to submit a link but then changed to a self post so you could enter text. Can't do that, it's either a linkless self post or a link post with no text and you will have to comment after posting. Reddit is just dumb like that and for whatever reason they never fixed it... It happens ALL the time, even to people who regularly post, so don't feel bad.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:08 PM
2

I always have said she should have given the excess money to some deserving indie devs to actually make a difference and develop a good female friendly game. Apparently I'm a horrible misoginyst for thinking women should contribute to the gaming scene instead of men sacrificing their time and money to please them... She's in it to make money and further her "career" though, why would she give it to someone else, especially when she likely knows the kind of game she is demanding will likely flop …
/r/MensRights28/12/14 09:36 AM
1

He specifically says in that thread he outright avoids the discussion because it's not worth the harassment to him personally. Which is fir enough really. Goes to show how bad feminist bullying is when arguably the "most powerful" male gaming personality is unwilling to voice his opinion openly because of it.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:50 PM
1

Indeed. In fact from what I hear it's actually significantly more common for "recreational" use amongst the gaybros, who are more often ardent worshipers of Brodin than straight men and choose Zyzz as the patron saint rather than ones such as Sigmarsson.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:55 PM
1

Yes, and nothing to do with women. Most guys want to be rich and retired by 30 because it means they can do whatever the fuck they want and have no responsibilities or pressures. Being attractive to women for those reasons is just a second benefit, not a primary motivator. Having a really fucking easy life is worth WAY more than other things, especially if you can get it by doing something you enjoy (playing handegg) in the first palce.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:52 AM
1

Going by the article it's actually mostly tied to desire for performance in sports, typically 'Murican Handegg. When you desperately want that scholarship so you can be loaded and retired by the time you are 30 your gona have to juice up, cause if you don't your competitors will and then they will beat you. All professional sports are like this, their are the naturally gifted and incredible athletes and then there are the naturally gifted and incredible athletes who take PED's and beat the ones …
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:45 AM
2

Alternatively, putting large quantities of hormones into their bodies during puberty could potentially severely fuck up their endocrine system for life. This seems to be the common belief amongst most roid users I've seen speak about it at least and it certainly makes sense to me. I've got no problem with roids and the like (so long as you are honest about it at least), and I fully agree the illegality is poorly thought out, but they are also much more poorly researched as a result of that and I…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:39 AM
5

Specifically in african populations... With poor educations... and aversions to protective measures like condoms... And where the HIV positive population is like abajillion times higher than the developed western countries the CDC is saying this applies too... Not to mention that babies aren't going to be going around fucking HIV positive people... And nobody is legally allowed to have sex until they are old enough to make an informed decisions for them selves about if they want part of their co…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:23 AM
1

meh, the only thing you can get angry with is yourself. If you die it's entirely your fault like99.9% of the time. It really is an expertly crafted game. The first one at least, there is a lot less polish and craftmanship in the second sadly (still a good game, just nowhere near as good as the first or demons souls was).
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:16 AM
1

Her whole team at digipen worked on narbacular drop, I don't believe the specfic idea was ever credited to any one of them in particular. Considering it was a group project I don't think it's fair to give her sole credit until the rest of her team has said otherwise. Also, we are talking about writing, not gameplay design so it's kind of irrelevant to the topic. TBH, I think she is a bit of a one hit wonder in terms of design. Quantum Connundrum was okay, but it was basically portal with differe…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:59 AM
2

Seems like they have pretty similar themes then (although quite frankly nobody should be messing with mushroom parents unless they are fully prepared, you certainly wouldn't choose them to grind souls). I can definately see where the confusion comes from. I highly recommend Dark Souls by the way. It's a fantastic game and it should finally be free of that GFWL crap this month too if your on PC. I'd personally hold off Dark Souls 2 however until the special edition is released however unless you …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 04:47 AM
2

Mushroom Parent from Dark Souls. Basically there were lots of mini mushrooms in some places, and if you attack one it lets out a cry and mushroom parent comes along and fucks up your shit. And those fuckers were TOUGH. Worst thing was if your in the forest near Artorias' Grave and you get Gravelorded. Black Phantom Mushroom parents were a force o' fuckin nature man, ain't nothin' gettin rid of them cept killing the Gravelord. Bonus fact: I'm pretty sure that sword is a lightning enchanted Zweiha…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:13 AM
1

Planescape wasn't an original universe for Torment, it was a pretty well fleshed out part of the D&D multiverse before Torment was made. Torment was quite possibly the best written game ever made though. Fuck I can't wait for Tides of Numenera to come out.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:52 AM
4

Portal was written by a man. Kim Swift was lead designer, not a writer. Eric Wolpaw was the writer for Portal (and every other valve thing). Kim did come up with the cake joke though, she deserves credit for that at least.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:49 AM
1

Is society allowed to be imperfect without there being a vast conspiracy against men? Sure, but when they keep making the same mistake EVERY TIME and AFTER BEING CORRECTED EVERY TIME you have to start wondering if they are actually the stupidest people on earth (and thus shouldn't be allowed the power they have) or if they are doing it on purpose...
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:40 AM
3

Sounds like somebody forgot to check their privilege. Guys getting turned down while women women get entry is pretty standard. I've been denied entry because the venue was "full to capacity". The bouncer said this with a perfectly straight face as he let two women who just walked up in right in front of me about 5 seconds after he told me the place was full (and nobody had walked out);
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:36 AM
1

"help prove that games with decent, well written female protagonists have a place and that pubs don't need to rely on flashing titties and shallow male power fantasies to make big profits. I'm as sick of it as you are, so lets see it changed." makes you a feminist in my mind Well thats nice and all, but calling me a feminist doesn't make me one, and it doesn't stop a large portion of "feminists" from attacking me, calling me all sorts of horrible things that aren't true and ignoring anything I s…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:59 AM
1

I feel the same way about how this subreddit characterizes feminism when it focuses only on the extremists rather than what most actually think or believe. Most don't speak or act in anyway and thus are irrelevant to the conversation. They don't stop the extremists from doing the bad things and more often than not they actually support it in my experience. The feminists we judge feminism by DO identify as feminist though, and they are judged by their actions, not meaningless words. Some dick on …
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:59 AM
2

Well, I've been gaming for 20+ years and I've never had an issue with female gamers or seen anyone giving them shit aside from socially awkward young guys trying to chat them up (and if you are really going to claim that a guy trying to chat a girl up is wrong then you and I are going to have to have words). I have seen women pulling the whole "I'm a girl, pay attention to me!" bullshit, and they get treated like they deserve, as attention seeking bitches. Then we can look at the whole Sarkeesia…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 01:42 AM
2

I'd like to point out that a lot of feminists think that a lot of issues surrounding men's rights could be solved with feminism. Sounds good on paper. If women weren't stereotyped as weak, passive, submissive, etc. then we would probably be more capable of seeing them as abusers and criminals. But feminists constantly portray them selves as the weak helpless victims and men as the strong dominant aggressors. If we didn't assume that all women are supposed to be nurturing, then perhaps child cust…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:28 PM
3

At least the WeBoBaps say they are the good side and act like you'll get cake or something, Sarkeesian just claims if you are a woman and try gaming then you will get harassed and probably raped or something. GREAT way to encourage women to participate there Anita ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:58 AM
3

Because that solves the issue, and if it gets solved she can't make money pedaling her "solutions".
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:56 AM
1

If it were a female power fantasy, why would feminists be against it? Because they haven't thought through the implications of getting rid of it (just like a bunch of other stuff). That and they assume the meaning of the trope is some evil patriarchy scheme to oppress women (like everything else in existence) instead of what it actually is (putting women on a pedestal and placing extreme value on them).
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:22 AM
1

Because it's easy to blame things you don't like on things you don't understand. Same reason it was comics before it, and probably will be VR headsets in about 15-20 years.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:03 AM
1

It's basically the prosecution saying it's either too hard or too costly to get you properly, so give us a freebie and in exchange we wont hit you as hard. If you say no then they hit you with full force to make up for having to work for it. It's literally called plea bargaining because the prosecution is bargaining with you for your non-resistance to make it easy for them.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:33 AM
10

not saying I don't believe you, but.... Also, thank you for recognizing my greatness ;) Seriously though, best to not try and correct them, let them go full retard and display just how irrelevant their opinions are.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:31 AM
1

That was actually pretty funny. To be super serial for a sec though, something like this is probably closer.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:49 AM
1

When I go running I like to wear really tiny shorts. Luckily the only people who seem to ever have a problem are my girlfriends. Yay. although once a woman screamed at me and apparently called the police. Bro, move to NZ. Stubbies are like the national uniform here.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:40 AM
1

That sounds like logic, which means it must be bigoted misogyny. Clearly those women whose job it is to be on their feet all day work just as hard as the men out back whose job it is to be on their feet all day WHILE CARRYING HEAVY THINGS and thus deserve the same pay. Also, I like their example from the 70's where they demonstrate that stitching, something that would have been an incredibly common skill amongst women in the 70's is equated to the kind of specialty knowledge required to mechanic…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:23 AM
2

I think you think too hard about C&H, it's all low hanging fruit and poop jokes basically. If it seems to pick on male shaming it's just reflective of how much more commonly repeated and quick to thought those kind of jokes are, not because of any agenda or anything. A typical C&H comic these days: Not really. I mean, the last week or so worth: dumb joke about man with odd shaped mustache dumb joke about inappropriate humor (I guess this is the most objectionable because it says "dad killed mom"…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:22 AM
10

TL;DR - Anita says "no matter what reality demonstrates, men are wrong and everything is their fault because Patriarchy. The End".
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:53 AM
35

because I was DDOSing her with completed work to grade Unless you were also doing everyone elses homework too then it was just a regular DOS.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 08:10 AM
1

I don't really think this is a fair comment. For starters not being successful as a prostitute doesn't change the fact that you are one. Also, in the context where this is relevant (feminists saying that prostitution is a terrible thing that one is forced into, is dehumanizing etc.) success is also irrelevant. Just some guy can't get paid to let some stranger fuck him doesn't change the fact he might be doing it because he has no other options. If anything it just highlights the inequity of valu…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:40 PM
2

In Anita's defense, she isn't really using the damsel in distress trope because she isn't saying she needs saving (and why would you need saving from all that free pity money?). As for the conceal carry business... why can't all the feminists bring guns too so anyone who tried to commit a mass shooting would get riddled full of holes in an instant? I mean, if all the feminists just agreed to bring guns to the talk (doesn't matter if they do or not cause concealed carry is all about that cold war…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:29 PM
8

Title is bad, they want to have the financial luxury to stay home to raise kids, likely they would prefer working if they have no kids. But really you are really picking the wrong point here, just one line lower it quotes another figure one in three resent their partner for not earning enough to make that dream a reality. Now THAT is fucked up. that 30% of women should be dumped right fucken now. As for the rest of the article... duh? Living off someone else's work has always been the easiest an…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:50 PM
1

INAL, but I am am paranoid. I would say bring ALL your mutual friends that are on your side. Like as many as will fit in the room and then some. If she doesn't have a decent amount with her then it makes her look crazy. Don't take it easy expecting common sense and reasonableness to prevail, crush that shit with an overwhelming show of force. Also, it might sound extreme, but for your own safety (and to help any other poor fucks she drags into this trap) I would consider getting a restraining or…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:12 AM
1

No, but at least it will have some affect on popular opinion. People like argumentum ad populum, and thats hard to enforce when opinions don't appear popular any more.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:32 AM
2

No, it just prevents them being identified as what they want.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:09 AM
1

number of guests and cost have to be considered independently. large number of guests might be a positive predictor regardless of cost (or cost per guest if you prefer) where as overall cost regardless of guest counts might be a negative predictor (i.e. you spend 500k on a wedding and 3 people show up, and one of those is the priest and the other two the people getting married). Results make some sense two, if you spend a lot regardless then you are probably getting married for the spectacle ins…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:52 AM
2

we will have no voice and what we do have will be spun to be "misogynist, basement dwelling neckbeards" As they are trying to do in Gamergate. Until they lose half their revenue because guys get sick of their bullshit. It's already starting to happen to all the games websites, they are tanking HARD while people flock to guys like Totalbiscuit and PewDiePie who actually (shock and horror) talk about games and stuff instead of calling their readers neckbeards and entitled and insulting them consta…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:10 AM
2

Stupid paywalls. I like to actually read stuff before I cite it :( certainly sounds about right though.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:07 AM
6

I was going to post "the internet isn't safe for ANYONE", then I looked at the actual post contents. It's still the appropriate response.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:05 AM
1

PZ unfortunately was pretty influential and had a pop following if nothing else, and many of the other "pop atheists" I can think of except for thunderf00t and theAmazingAtheist turned too, all though admittedly I didn't follow the movement religiously (pun intended) so I could be missing a bunch. While the intellectuals like Dawkins are nice to have on your side and to publish a few books, a lot of mind share is won in that pop culture youtube arena these days and I can't help but think if it w…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:45 AM
2

That would send a very strong message to any other field considering letting feminists in. You would think the flaccid mess they left the atheist movement in would have been enough for that.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:03 AM
6

Ironically, I have next to no idea what is going on with gamers gate for two reasons. 1 is the heavy handed feminist censorship of any and all criticism (which basically means nothing gets posted about it in /r/games. 2 is because I stopped reading all gaming "news" websites about 2 years ago when it became clear they were all heavily focused on clickbaiting opinion pieces instead of writing useful and interesting content. I do however know enough to say games journalisim is shit (could have tol…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:01 AM
2

Gamers, especially the older ones had a long history of being shunned and teased by women, so they are understandably suspicious when they suddenly want in on the action and act like it's the coolest thing ever (but strangely still wont talk to them about it or paly the games with them). On top of that the feminst argument is basically EXACTLY the same as the bullshit "video games cause real world violence" crap we have had to put up with for decades from Jack Thompson and the like, so it's easy…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:30 PM
1

To be fair, a large portion of those games are non name titles, and the argument is less that they don't get any representation and more that it's not quality representation (but then neither is the male equivalent tbh). At the end of the day there is only one reasonable explanation, and that is that the majority of the audience simply doesn't have interest in good female protagonists. Amazing games like Beyond Good and Evil and The Longest Journey did abysmally, despite being very well regarded…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:25 PM
1

Overreliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals is the primary cause of global warming. ACTUALLY.... You would be surprised how much of it is a direct result of emmisions from popular animals such as cows, which are grown in mass quantities to produce meat and dairy to feed the vast quantities of people. On top of that huge areas of forest are removed to make more room for grazing animals to be reared, reducing the planets carbon absorption capacity. They also cause significant pollution of w…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:58 AM
2

chock I believe the phrase is "chalk one up", as in add a point to the tally on the blackboard.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 08:39 AM
1

And it's just as often used as a term of endearment as well. After all, what straight guy doesn't love cunt?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:27 AM
3

My guess is that figure is SIGNIFFICANTLY padded by manga, which has a lot of female specific content compared with the comic industry. While it's not a silly comparison like the ESA "gamers" numbers are, it's still not a perfectly comparable thing as the markets are fairly segregated. The women going out there and buying lots of yaoi or shoujo stuff etc. probably aren't buying too much DC/Marvel stuff.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:59 AM
9

Thats not entirely fair, Lori Anne Cole and Roberta Williams are both responsible for a large portion of my childhood, and (Roberta much more than Lori probably) a lot of other peoples as well. Women who actually want to make good games are perfectly capable of doing so. The issue is that almost every woman with any presence in the industry doesn't want to make good games, they want to attention whore.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:56 AM
1

Depends how far the stick is up your ass as to if you consider it sexist: 1/ People always address everyone in the people in the room as "Ladies", occasionally add "and gentlemen" after a brief but awkward sounding pause. 2/ passing around of men in speedos calendars etc. in emails. 3/ other misc "naughty emails" such as a web page that used some flocking AI to make a bunch of 8-bit style animated naked men run around in the shape of a clock that could be switched between analogue and digital. 4…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:32 AM
2

It takes two to make a baby, should probably take two to un-make one. I'm fine with giving women a larger portion of the say, they bare a larger portion of the risks and requirements, but the guys opinion is still worth something. In some cases, such as where it was a mutually agreed upon pregnancy and the woman later changed her mind, I think, while it's unreasonable to force the woman to keep the child, some kind of compensation should be able to be sought by the man. Having kids is serious fu…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:47 AM
11

Also, it's important for temperature regulation and is a strong biological impulse because if you let em get too hot your sperm die off.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:42 AM
0

Wow! Only three sentences here and you still managed to contradict yourself. So which is it? Is Steve a “hypothetical being” or simply not real. (Which means he isn’t hypothetical any more.) What? Do you know what hypothetical actually means? Because if something is hypothetical it must by definition not exist... Steven is a computer representation of a character, and thus has no real gender. The same can be said of Laura Croft by the way, who is ALSO a fictional character. ಠ_ಠ, seriously? Also,…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:45 AM
1

My favourite is when they accidentally start eating themselves, like with that gay stereotype fighting game they all called homophobic and ripped on, except it was made by a gay dude and was totally totally tongue in cheek.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:28 AM
2

Steve is a computer generate image – IT has no gender Yes, but that computer generated image is a hypothetical actual being, so hypothetically it has a gender. When Steve is called Steve and has a goatee it's pretty clear what gender Steve hypothetically is. If you want to bitch about semantic shit then we should just stop talking about gender, because it's not even a real thing, it's an abstract attribute that we made up, so it doesn't exist in the real world. But with that said; players clearl…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:25 AM
1

And Steve can be reskinned into basically anything (as long as you like polyhedral blocks, sort of like Henry Ford's take on colours for the Model T). I quite like Florastar's and Pahimar's, off the top of my head, and there are plenty of tools out there to make your own skins. Instead of bitching about the default being male, it would be more productive to teach girls and women how to use those tools to stamp their own creative effort onto their avatar. But that would be a solution, which isn't…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:14 AM
1

So like I said, while all that stuff was essentially irrelevant and not particularly intended, it still had a decidedly male "possible" name, and decidedly male traits, far from gender neutral. I admit I haven't payed close attention o Minecraft for a long time, but Steve is basically the cannonical avatar at this point (pretty sure there was no questionmark in the name when he appeared in Super Meat Boy). Not trying to claim it's an amazing representation of gender politics or anything (I don't…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:11 AM
2

Steve has a goatee/stuble... and is called Steve... I don't really think you can make much of a compelling argument for the avatar in Minecraft being gender neutral...
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:08 AM
14

Feminist doctrine and activity causes a lot of mens rights issues, to get equality we first need to correct the inequality they caused. Doing this is perceived as misogyny though, and an attack on feminism, hence why they hate us so much. They wont work with us because most of the time it would mean undoing their own work. Also, all mens problems are supposed to be the fault of men according to feminism (patriarchy) so as long as they ignore us and keep doing what they want then when they finall…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:44 PM
3

Unfortunately it probably still wouldn't be enough to get the guy his dick back, or even something that was a satisfactory replacement.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:28 PM
3

The typical sexual predator has sociopathic personality traits and low-empathy, which makes education a completely ineffective means of reduction. Men who rape do not rape because they are ignorant of what rape is, men who rape simply don't care. I don't understand how this thought never occurs to feminists. I mean, do they think that the average rapist does it cause he just thought thats how chicks shake hands or something?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:48 AM
2

The average guy is piss weak and does no phsyical activity. Having huge amounts of testosterone makes it easier to build an maintain muscle, but if you aren't eating enough and aren't doing enough work (which the average guy isn't) then you aren't going to build shit. If what you are saying was true then I wouldn't have to buy men's "loose fit" jeans with the waist 2-4" too big just so I can walk up stairs without hulking out of them, and I have wide hips for a guy and I'm not super slim or anyt…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:40 PM
2

I think you VASTLY overestimate how strong the average man actually is. Sure some could out-muscle a well trained woman, even with no training themselves, but a lot of guys are piss weak. Your average large man could still beat up Rhonda Rousey and she's a trained MMA specialist. Just watch her interview with Pete Holmes I just did, aside from being painfully cheesy she didn't look like she was struggling to move his weight around, more she was struggling to do it slowly so as to demonstrate for…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:47 PM
5

The funniest part of all this is feminists keep complaining about how it's unfair cause men are bigger and stronger, but they could easily turn it around if they wanted. A year or two in the gym and a decent protein intake would make pretty much any woman stronger than the average guy (which is a lot weaker than they would care to admit), and even without that some martial arts lessons or something would give them sufficient edge too. Then again, they would use the same excuse on the 100lb guy t…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:22 PM
2

Stuff like this is why I'm seriously considering voting for Winston. He'd be a terrible prime minister but at least he's funny and can handle the media like a boss. Then when the country is in shambles I can threaten to vote him in again unless the other politicians stop being retarded.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:36 AM
1

You say that like pretty much every other politician/party isn't?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:30 AM
1

Women have artificially inflated the value of pussy through their attitudes and behaviours (largely brought about by societal conditioning). Women don't ask out men (yet will happily sit back and bitch about how he won't ask them out), they make men dance through hoops to prove their worth etc. They get raised being told they are special princesses who can have whatever they want and any man would be lucky to have them and they end up believing that. All of a sudden having a loving partner isn't…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:25 AM
1

My point was more about the whole step in to help a 17 year old girl being attacked by a paranoid man? comment. It's pretty much guaranteed that you will not be in any position to judge the whole "paranoid man vs innocent 17yo girl" thing, and they specifically phrased it as helping the girl. For all you know the 17yo girl just murdered his dog and is threatening to do the same to his kids. You don't help the girl, just like you don't help the man because you don't know what the fuck is going on…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:37 AM
3

You don't become a professor if you're stupid. She's a professor of politics, if anything I would think being stupid would be beneficial to that. Logic and reason are the LAST things politics have ever been based on :\
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:01 AM
4

Unless you know exactly whats going on you shouldn't be stepping in to help anyone. If you are going to intervene (which is perfectly reasonable) you do it to create separation and avoid altercation. If you don't know who is right or wrong then you sure as fuck don't go picking sides.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:55 AM
1

Who's arguing and yelling (caps have been for emphasis because it's easier to hold down shift and back in my day HTML formatting options like italics and bolding weren't exactly common on the internet)? I'm just clarifying my position because you have yet to address it past "thats just the way it is" (which isn't addressing it at all). You aren't going to change how men and women court on the internet yelling at a stranger Not with that attitude. Social changes work by changing the way society t…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:24 PM
1

But fat dudes aren't garunteed to get denied. Yea, but when it's still more likely than not. And that is STILL beside my point, just because they have a chance if they do all the work, DOESN'T MEAN THEY SHOULD HAVE TO DO ALL THE WORK TO HAVE A CHANCE. And that whole thing before about girls being friends and not wanting to date is because you made them friends instead of pursuing them romantically. EXACTLY. THESE GIRLS WANTED TO GO OUT WITH ME. But because I DIDN'T DO THE WORK MYSELF that never …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:55 PM
1

Go online, meet people through friends, etc. But if you go to a bar it's going to be that kind of interaction and I honestly don't understand why it should change. But it's EVERYWHERE. Most of chicks I meet is through friends at social gatherings, or ones I met while I was at uni. Like I said, no issues making female friends, and many of them all but admit to me they wanted to go out with me, but "now it would be weird cause we are friends" and things like that. I just don't understand why you c…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:28 AM
1

The thing is, statements like "well it doesn't happen to me" and "I don't see a problem with it" are a big part of the reason why /r/MensRights is a thing in the first place. You can say you don't believe it's a real thing, but then how do you explain me going from "it's raining pussy" to "lots of female friends indirectly bitching about how I never asked them out" overnight when me literally just not ever saying "hey, I like you and I think we should start dating" is basically the ONLY thing th…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:12 PM
1

I don't want to be a dick, but it really sounds like you are just butt hurt because the women you liked didn't like you back. You've done this multiple times, there is no need to try and make personal attacks on me based on completely random assumptions (which for the record have been wrong on all counts). You seem way too focused on trying to make this about "me being butthurt" and you aren't addressing anything I say at all so this is obviously a fruitless conversation and I might as well end …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:42 PM
3

Pretty is a feminine descriptor. It's sure possible for a guy to look pretty, I mean, in Japan it's even the most desirable descriptor for young guys, Bishonen basically literally means "pretty boy" and it's basically the archetypal look for any cool/attractive young man in media over there. Take a look at Gakt,can't really think of anything to describe him except pretty (he is admittedly a somewhat extreme case however). It's also entirely reasonable to call a woman handsome. Cate Blanchette is…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:44 AM
1

Why shouldn't they? It's human nature. Confidence shows strength and experience, both which a woman would be looking for. It's instinct. Why shouldn't they what? Force guys to jump through hoops and deal with shit tests and other bullshit just to get the "privilege" of not dieing lonely? Why should the slaves have been freed? It's only instinct to shun/exploit those different to you and nature prefers strength and adaptability anyway, if they wanted freedom then they should have just fought for …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:38 AM
1

My issue isn't confidence or weight (I'm expecting to be about 190 lbs @ 5'10 and 10-12%bf relatively soon and I've never had an issue picking up chicks when I try). My issue is that the courtship game is completely one sided. After getting sick of the bullshit I just stopped asking out chicks and haven't had a date since (made plenty of female friends of course, some of which ironically complained about freindzoning themselves). My issue is that I shouldn't HAVE to do all the trying and take al…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:22 AM
1

Sure, but they don't have to be Which is the crux of the problem really. And to be honest, if they expect a guy to sift through a bunch of bullshit just to find out if they like him (especially when the obvious default assumption is no), not to mention doing all the work in the courtship ritual and assuming all the risk, then are they really relationship material anyway? I mean, I'm not a big fan of crying about "victim blaming" and that kind of malarky, but when you get a bunch of guys being to…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:53 AM
2

Maybe they should be? I'm sure there are a lot of guys out there who would LOVE to know they have some hope, even if they don't measure up to the "standard".
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:22 AM
2

I've seen lots of women say they prefer "cuddly" guys. Of course they then go for the otter mode guy or the one with the chiseled abs any way...
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:20 AM
1

I believe feminists call it "intersectionality". If they were gay as well then black guys wouldn't be allowed to complain to them etc. because relatively speaking black guys are "privileged". Or some shit like that...
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:17 AM
1

Latin actually, cis = "on the same side as", trans = "on the opposite side of". Most science stuff comes from Latin actually.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:41 AM
1

To be fair, it's not really a series as it is a bunch of games that have the same title and are all jRPG's with similar mechanics for the most part (at least until the last few years when they started doing the whole sequel thing). Also, the game is Japanese and it goes with the whole Bishonen thing like I was saying. But yea, if thats what she wants there is craploads of Yaoi/Shoujo stuff comin out of Japan and plenty of Japanese games that cater to her desires, not sure why she is picking on s…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:55 AM
1

And again, the other guys abs are probably as big as his are flexed, or maybe even bigger without flexing, so at similar fat levels he's going to have similar definition without flexing.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:42 AM
1

You don't need to be single digits to have abs by a long shot. Some guys might not till they hit single digits because their abs are tiny, but guys with good solid cores can get noticeable abs ~15%. Take this chart for example, the 10, 15, 25, 30 and 40% are all the same guy from memory, he did a fat to fit style blog and ended up doing some male modelling. The 10, 15 and 25% pics were all properly measured using water displacement too from memory. He certainly has abs at 10-12% and at 15 they w…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:13 AM
1

Well, feel free to go secretly recording people without their consent then and see where that gets you when it's found out.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:22 AM
1

No, but the way you get rid of them is identical, you just eat below your tdee. It doesn't take any more effort or anything like that, you just keep eating below your tdee and adjust as your tdee changes because you lost weight. Doesn't matter if you need to lose 30 lbs or 300, all that changes is where your tdee is and how much you can safely get below that.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:21 AM
1

5-7? fuck no. That is full on bodybuilder in comp condition, and it's really not possible to maintain less than about 8% year round without health issues, being at 5 year round would put someone on the verge of death. You need fat to be available for hormone synthasis and stuff. This chart isn't too bad, from memory the 10-25% was the same guy and actually measured. The 3-4% on may be accurate, but thats a comp ready body builder who wont be that bf% for more than a few days and had to literally…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:38 PM
1

I'm pretty sure any evidence that is obtained illegally (which this probably is) is considered admissible (i.e. the judge wont allow it to be shown and any mention of it will literally result in the judge telling the jury they are not allowed to consider this information) and can't be used in court, and it's mere existence would probably just compound your punishment. I'm also not a lawyer, but it seems like a good way to make things worse to me. Just tell the chick you aren't fucking her withou…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:27 PM
1

Oh yea, it takes a year or two sure, but the actors etc. don't get it done in 3-4 months cause they work out more, it's cause they take fuckin steroids man. Those super hardcore workouts they do? It's maybe a 2hr split 4 days a week in most cases. Some might do 5 or 6 days, but it's not really necessary. You wanna build mass you literally NEED to not over do it because muscle builds when your resting, working out breaks it down. Must have forgotten to put the "wont happen overnight" caveat, I pu…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:23 PM
1

Sure they are on steroids, but that doesn't change the point. With a big solid core you end up wtih abs at higher bodyfats. And he is WAY bigger than that dude is, that guy has lower body fat and still has less defined obliques than the other guy. You forget that belly fat is the hardest to get rid of for guys It's not the hardest, it's the same as the rest. It's just where the most is because the body holds it there to protect organs and keep them warm etc. It's the last place you will see gett…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:56 PM
1

Sorry, guess I pinched that one off too early.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:03 PM
2

Didn't reddit go on a big witchhunt and ban /r/jailbait and everything else that that which was dodgy (drive by the feminist brigade of course, which is why shit like dickslips is still there)? Meanwhile /r/dickslips is pretty much entirely "hey, I took pics of this guys dick while he was passed out" or "this guy totally didn't know his bellend was showing in public". The male analogy, /r/upskirt is entirely porn from consensual actresses however. One is creepy and probably illegal, the other is…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:02 PM
1

Agreed. Being able to do 10 at 100kg makes you a lot stronger than being able to do 15 at 70kg though. I'm just saying being fat makes for some hefty resistance training at ALL times.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:53 AM
1

I disagree, his obliques are noticeable and he doesn't even really have love handles. He looks fatter than he actually is cause he has a pretty solid core I would say. Other than around the stomach (which EVERYONE gets, and it's always the last place to go), fat deposition is pretty genetics based so you can't really make judgements from other body parts. Also, he's clearly not not flexing (his body is in the wrong position to be flexing muscles) so he's going to look somewhat soft at that bf. H…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:44 AM
2

The only thing constant in her dates is her. Instead of looking at her part in her dating life Pffft, clearly introspection is just a patriarchal tool of oppression. She can tell it is cause it makes her feel bad, thus it's clearly misogyny.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:03 AM
1

You seem like an awesome dad, rock on dude. If anyone complains then it's probly just cause they are mad jelly their dad wasn't as badass as you. \m/
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:01 AM
1

Right now, sure, but he could probably be in great shape in a few months if he wanted to. He only looks ~20%bf at the moment, plus hes muscular enough he'd probably be starting to have decent looking abs at 15%. On the other hand, the actual model is probably not above 12% and would look like your average guy at 15%, and pretty terrible at 20%, wouldn't get a second look from the ladies.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:54 AM
2

keep a hidden camera wherever sex will happen Sounds like a good way to get kicked out for sneaking recordings of women having sex against their will. Might not get kicked out for rape, but the unsolicited recordings will probably do the same daamge anyway. Don't hide the camera, put it out in the open and get the both of you on film confirming you are aware of the camera and consent tot he encounter being recorded. If any chick asks why tell her it's because you don't feel safe having sex with …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:30 AM
1

To be fair, while #3 might not be undies model material, he looks pretty strong. If he cut down to sub 12ish% body fat he would probably look in damn good shape.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:26 AM
1

Nuthin wrong with /r/ladyboners. /r/DickSlips on the other hand... Wanting to look at dicks is one thing, posting up pictures of other peoples dicks without their permission and in circumstances when they most likely would HIGHLY disapprove of it even being taken in the first place let alone made a permanent record for all to see... Most of that front page is the kinda shit that could get you jailed for doing...
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:17 AM
2

Yea, the whole comic is a bit silly as it's A) unrealistic, most guys would jsut say "well now he looks dumb and I am much less interested in batman". I'm guessing her preference in sexy comic characters is also probably influenced a lot by Yaoi, so the Bishonen look is what you would expect from such biases. Traditional women of european descent's ideals though are more in line with the Fabio look. Having said that, since the turn of the millennium it's been swinging more the Bishi/otter-mode e…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:08 AM
1

You could argue that exercising more to lose weight is more effective and it's true exercise makes a good supplement in weight loss, but eating less is FAR more effective. It takes no effort to not shove the donuts down your pie hole, where as exercising them off could take several HOURS on a treadmill. regular exercise will give you a nice metabolism boost which is effectively about 300ish more calories burned a day for most people. That adds up over time for sure, but getting much more than th…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:56 AM
0

The workout required those stars to attain those physiques is insane. not really. First off, you need to work out like 6 hours a day with a professional trainer. No you don't. 1-2 hours, 3 days a week is sufficient. 6 hours a day is highly detrimental to building a good physique as it doesn't allow sufficient time for recovery. PT's are also not required, basic routines like the ones in the /r/fitness FAQ (sometimes needing some accessories) will get you there or damn close. Time consuming "bro …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:50 AM
1

Take a look at before/afters for Zyzz. He would be (no longer) living proof otherwise. If your shoulders look to skinny you just need to do more presses and dips. Not enough V taper? wide grip pull ups/Lat pull downs baby. Not enough junk in ya trunk? Squats all day. Genetics have some effect on proportions of the frame, muscle insertions etc., but they don't stop you getting huge or ripped, just mean you wont look identical to the huge n ripped guy standing next to you.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:14 AM
1

high metabolism and are an ectomorph high metabolisim means eat another 200-500 calories a day, that can be a taken care of with a bowl of icecream probably. If you need much more than 500 calories more/less than other people your size then you probably have a thyroid problem or a parasite of some kind and should see a doctor (and then the medication will regulate it back down/up to normal. The "ectomorph" thing is wash, it's useful for categorising people, but in terms of dictating actual biolo…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:09 AM
2

Any male celebrity these days who has gotten into shape for a film will confirm this. It's a BITCH gaining an admirable male physique. Losing some weight is easy. Any celeb who has done this will also NOT confirm the fact they also took steroids to get into that kind of shape on time. Seriously, it's way more common than most people would believe (and then they try and sell some bullshit "wolverine workout" or whatever to poor schmucks who are way beneath the level of fitness that kind of workou…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:52 AM
0

To be fair, it's much easier for a guy to hit the typical 10-12% bf you see on models than it is for women to get to the sub 15's that would make them look equally cut. Women just generally carry a lot more essential fat that the body doesn't want to get rid of for biological reasons. Men also gain muscle MUCH easier than women, which creates an easier route to lowering body fat % as well. Having said that, women tend to look better over a MUCH wider range of body fats than men. I've seen chicks…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:32 AM
-1

Reading that all I could think was "your upset because you are held to the standards men are held to?" I've been concerned about dodgy looking cunts following me late at night before. I've had to deal with creepy chicks who couldn't take a hint. "suck it up bitch" is exactly the response most men would get to saying they were afraid. Most guys would be told they should have fought it off if they were raped. I'm WAY more likely to get shanked in an alley than any chick is, and I'm a 200lb 5'10 gu…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:46 PM
6

Can confirm, had never heard of it till I got told "I sounded like one of those awful MRA types" for pointing out how Anita Sarkeesian completely failed at applying critical thought to her Tropes vs Videogames series on /r/games. After a bit of googling wondering what they were on about I found this place with a bunch of "wife took my kids away :'(", "girlfriend lied about birth control" and "she cheated on me and took all my money in the divorce" posts on the front page. Left me confused why be…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:10 AM
1

Yea, but when the vast majority of the community is like "lol, shut up and make me a sandwich" it shuts them AND the white knights down pretty effectively. The biggest problem is that it also gives them ammunition to use with the ignorant outside of the community to get them on side. Then again, it's not like calm reasoning and logic has done much good for the MRM either when most places think of this place as the cesspool of the internet.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:29 AM
1

Honestly, I don't think I've ever seen one... Either they do get censored or (more likely) nobody has ever cared enough to submit one. Lets face it, apart from feminist bitching the Gaming community don't have a lot of problems. Biggest would be unrealistic male imagery, which I would like to think most are smart enough to know is unrealistic and they will never look like those who dudes who make Ronnie fuckin' Coleman look small. Theres also the glorification of male disposability, but I think …
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:27 AM
14

Anita Sarkeesian was named Ambassador for Gaming at the Game Developer's Conference, so I'd assume at least SJWs have infiltrated the Gaming community as well. Nah, most people still think she is a fucktard in the gaming community. The only people who give her any attention are wannabe jurnos trying to clickbait and sycophant developers who want to look good on paper to people who nothing about gaming. Feminist bullshit still regularly gets downvoted into oblivion on /r/games.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:58 AM
7

But when I mentioned some of the issues facing men she immediately reacted with anger and stating that "Oh that's how men are viewed in society? Well that's their own fucking fault then, because it's a society that they rule". Did you remind her that men act the way they do because thats how they were taught and raised to, almost exclusively by women (who were also taught and raised by women, so they can't say men made them do it either)? So clearly this is all womens fucking fault, they teach/r…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:17 AM
1

Thats fair enough, even still, I'd be interested to see how many people that DON'T suspect are actually wrong, it's pretty common for people to not want to believe that someone they love would do something like that, and short of two white people having a black kid (or vice versa) they wouldn't get it checked likely. I think the actual number (while pretty much impossible to actually test) is still MUCH higher than most people would think.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:51 AM
20

INAL and all that: Anyone ever witness you asking her to stop making sexual advances? Talk to them right away and get them onside, they could be a valuable witness if needed and she tries to spin it that you had a go at her. Talk to your boss ASAP, like, call him at home if you have to, you don't want her getting to him first (if it's already the next day then she might have already). Tell them what happened at the least so they have your word on it and it's (hopefully) now their default positio…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:18 AM
0

1999 study by the American Association of Blood Banks found that in 30 percent of 280,000 blood tests performed to determine paternity, the man tested was not the biological father. Wow, assuming those people were all alive at the same time thats what, like 5% of the male population of the states? Thats a pretty huge portion really. Chances are, for ever 20 people you know, one of their dads isn't who they think it is :S
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:58 AM
1

Sorry, do you know me? I've sat quietly through plenty of shit, sometimes they stop, sometimes they don't. I get what you are saying just fine, what you seem to be missing is that I am telling you from first hand experience, your claim that simply ignoring it will always make it go away IS FLAT OUT WRONG. you have to make a passive aggressive gesture. The guy would have hit me in the back even if I had said nothing, in fact, he probably would have been even more pissed. And there was nothing pas…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:53 AM
1

No, they will just punish you for shits and giggles and if you don't accept that punishment then they will escalate till they get what they want (also has happened to me). Bullies are bullies, regardless of age or station. For reference, my high school had some bullshit rule where if you were caught sitting next to rubbish then you got a detention. I got one for sitting above a little scrunched up piece of glad wrap I didn't even know was there. When I refused to write lines as punishment The te…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:17 AM
0

What? They were purposely hitting the ball at my (bare) feet and then bitching about my feet getting in the way, I said that it was because they were aiming for my feet (perfectly calmly) and then went to get on with life. The whole exchange took all of 5 seconds, I couldn't have ignored it much less and it would have gained the same response either way cause the guy was a cock head and figured being a teachers son gave him total immunity from punishment (which was pretty much true, the PE teach…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:12 AM
7

The last time I ignored a bully he hit me in the back with a hockey stick (the grass club kind, not the flimsy ice hockey kind) for turning my back on him... Things don't always go away cause you ignored them.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:40 AM
1

Arguably the TV show depicts exactly what the book does, it's just harder to interpret without the additional context. My response to the feminists would be the same, they are interpreting things wrong, therefore their argument is invalid.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:38 PM
2

It wasn't depicted very well in the TV Show I don't think. If you read the books it's pretty clear she was perfectly willing to go through with it and knew it was coming months in advance. She wasn't happy about it and she was more than a little bit nervous, but she certainly did consent. It was all a "sacrifice she had to make" to get what she wanted, an army to go back and conquer her homeland with so her brother could sit on the throne. Illyrio and her brother did far worse than Drogo putting…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:46 PM
2

It doesn't even really make you look bigger. You look a tiny bit more puffy IF you are already at VERY low body fat (like 8-10% kind of ranges), but thats just water retention. You can achieve the same affects by eating a shitload of salt if you want, it's much cheaper. You can also achieve similar results temporarily by just flexing for a few seconds to get blood into your muscles. As for being bad on your kidneys, it's effects on them are negligible unless your kidneys are already fucked from …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:11 AM
8

meanwhile it becomes increasingly socially acceptable for males to use testosterone supplimentation, steroids and the like and the media celebrates it! The world is truly fucked up…" Wow, someone has never had any success at the gym before as a man... Being accused of getting results cause of steroids is EXTREMELY common, people even freak the fuck out over something as benign as creatine (commonly found in red meats), sometimes even fucking protein powders... Being on test/steroids is NOT socia…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:11 PM
2

Because, as any regular weightlifter could tell you, it's a shit load easier to put something down than to raise something up. Why make the good better when you can just bring them down to everyone else's level, letting everyone be "the top".
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:07 AM
1

And then a few more, and then a few more, and then a few.... Slipper Slope is a logical fallacy. Hope you like like the idea of your grandchildren speaking Arabic and practicing Sharia law. Okay, now your going full on crazy. Look, I live in New Zealand, we got indians and arabs and chineese and pacific isalnders comin out our asses here. The only culture conflict we have is with the Maoris cause the place is a fuckin colony and they were displaced. And it's not cause of Maori culture, it's caus…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:41 PM
2

The culture isn't going to die if we let a few people sleep with whoever they want or the way they want. By your logic religious people are perfectly justified in trying to ban gay marriage because allowing it would "kill their culture". It's fucking retarded in that case and it's fucking retarded in this case. Cultures existence are not mutually exclusive, more than one can exist besides another without destroying it. The only way it would do any harm to the other culture is if the members of t…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:29 AM
1

It's not supposed to be an argument, it's an off hand, facetious comment intended to highlight the absurdity of your statements. Again, until you actually demonstrate that these systems are practical and that only your specific ideal is actually morally tenable then you can say whatever you want but it doesn't mean shit in the grand scheme of things. I'll go back to my initial statement, you cannot make the statement that it is universally morally wrong, only that it doesn't suit your ideals, at…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:49 PM
2

I'm not saying ANY cultures are valid at all, I'm just saying that it's not reasonable to shame someone for a choice that is entirely theirs to make and doesn't affect you in any meaningful way. Quite frankly, I think such behavior is creepily controlling.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:16 PM
2

No. You think I did. Your claim is that bad marriage material = morally wrong. Not only have you not adequately provided any sound reasoning for this, but you have committed a Fallacy of composition You say some slutty women demonstrate poor morals, therefore all slutty women are. Correlation vs causation doesn't apply here It does when your claim is that being slutty causes bad morals (cause quite frankly I can't think of any other reason that it would have a 100% correlation...). What matters …
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:46 PM
2

Oh... you didn't read the end of the sentence? Way to COMPLETELY miss reading comprehension. I am confused.... And? You're just repeating shit rather than actually thinking about it. And you used a complete logical fallacy to create the very premise of your position, which undermines your entire argument. until you address this your position is untenable regardless of what you say. I'm repeating shit because I have already thought about it but until you address this glaring flaw everything else …
/r/MensRights18/04/14 08:07 AM
2

It isn't all of them, but it's also not exactly small and inconsequential. PZ Myers for example was pretty huge in the atheist scene till he went full mangina. Watching the whole schism happen though does kinda deflate the clout of the movement as a whole though, it was quite sad really.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:04 AM
2

I won't touch the body fat comments, that's the bat signal for SRS :) Haha, fair enough. Lets just say that the fact that /r/swoleaccpetance got confused with being serious by a large number of people somewhere along the line is somewhat telling about the whole thing though.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:20 AM
2

It would be great if this held true in the real world, but it doesn't and so the burden of helping the uninformed rests on those who are able to show (rather than tell) them their outstanding errors. I agree, that doesn't detract from the fact that when someone fails to conform to a minimum standard they need to be informed of such so they can improve. That should eventually lead you to want to help the opposition understand why. It does, but more often than not they would prefer to remain ignor…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:47 AM
2

It's not about being uninformed, it's about failing to make basic logical connections when presented with a patently flawed logical construct. This is a basic skill that any functioning member of society SHOULD have. My wellbeing in this society DEPENDS on other people being able to make sensible decisions because their decisions affect me. If they lack fundamental ability to make good decisions in negatively impacts me, potentially severely, and I have every right to not be happy about that. If…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:28 PM
1

I've always believed that the restricted thought/speech came from the right wing nuts. It comes from people in power in general most of the time. It's much easier to control what people think (and thus maintain your power) when you just plain don't let them. Of course that requires those not in power to be complicit, but that tends to happen cause people are lazy and it's much easier to have someone else do the thinking for you.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:45 PM
2

If promiscuity causes low chance of marriage succeeding Way to COMPLETELY miss my point. promiscuity doesn't necessecarily CAUSE failed marriages, it only has correlation. It's entirely possible for a promiscuous woman to be a perfectly good wife, hell you may even WANT and open marriage. Even if it did cause it, thats only for traditional marriage, theres no mention of alternative marriage systems. Marriage is the bedrock of any post-agricultural society. Ensuring men and women become good marr…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:26 PM
0

Yes, but we aren't addressing them here are we? I agree straight up calling them retarded to their face wouldn't be a great method for convincing them, but quite frankly, it's kinda true. I also kinda think it's one of those topics that aren't worth trying to convince the other side tbh, anyone that actually cares enough to discuss it is probably too emotionally invested in their side to care what the other has to say. Whenever I try discussing something with feminists they never discuss MY poin…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:15 PM
7

But is this being posted here just because she's a self-proclaimed feminist? Because this is just someone being an idiot, not something that proves feminists are evil...and even then I still don't understand why it's related to men's rights? O_o' Two reasons. First is it's extremely common for the tumblr style feminists to harp on about "online harrassment" and treat it as if simple trolling were genuine threats of death etc. and cry about how it's a serious issue and they can't sleep at night c…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:10 PM
7

I'm pretty sure she quite literally did "make it all about teh wimminz". Thats what Atheism+ is.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:00 PM
4

It's funny how feminists always get upset when I claim their constant watering down and "wolf crying" about things like rape and abuse etc. Is actually just highly demeaning and insulting to people who ACTUALLY suffer from those issues. Well, now the people with actual issues are saying it too and they STILL don't get the hint. Sometimes I just think that people like her simply aren't capable of living in the real world...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:53 PM
10

Yup, had a friend who was in a big car crash, refused to drive on it's anniversaries for a long time.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:50 PM
16

It's funny how practically mutually exclusive the whole conservative + atheist/pot smoker thing is in terms of political ideologies, but as soon as you apply it to MRA's all of a sudden it makes perfect sense and is entirely reasonable apparently...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:43 PM
3

A lot of people will look at the stat and think no deeper than "well they aren't the same number so we should work to raise females' wage." Yes, and they would be retarded as /u/hugolp said. What they SHOULD think when seeing that is "But that is ILLEGAL and there is no way they could possibly get away with it when industry standard pay is available and anyone who DOESN'T check to make sure their pay is fair is fucking stupid. Clearly there is something fisy with this statement and I withhold fu…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:41 PM
3

As cliche as it sounds, correlation != causation. Perhaps you should try considering WHY they have had large numbers of partners instead. Maybe it's cause the are such a bitch and nobody wants to stay with them? Maybe it's poor impulse control as you say in some cases, others could be because they have highly variable interests and simply lose it in their current spouse. Who says they have to be good at marriage anyway? It's not like getting married and staying that way is some kind of indicator…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:07 PM
3

Female sluts are people with low impulse control who do things because it feels good with little/no regard to the future impact it will have on their lives Says who? People can have perfectly good control and choose not to exercise it. It's not like sleeping with a lot of people makes them sex addicts. Sex means all kinds of different things to different people, if someone has little interest in monogamy then I don't see how that is a bad thing. I wouldn't marry someone like that, but if they do…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:14 AM
2

Daring to hold standards for women? This is the only part I have an issue with. Going by the responses in this thread the "holding to standards" part seems more like "shaming those who don't conform to our preference". Calling out fat chicks who call themselves "curvy" (Christina Hendricks is curvy, this is just plain fat) is one thing and I have no qualms about that. saying girls should be shamed for being promiscuous is completely different though. One is them blatantly lying, the other is sim…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:54 AM
1

Some of those are pretty retarded but there are also valid points mixed in there as well. I think the biggest problem is it is very vague about the points he is making and it's also very intentionally aggressive and confrontational, so it's pretty easy to assume he is being a dick. As many in the thread have claimed, he could just be saving "you shouldn't be celebrating engaging in lots of unprotected sex with dozens of strangers on any given week, it's bad for everyone involveds health", and th…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:39 AM
1

Umm... The purpose of school is not to raise children for parents, it's to cram a SHITLOAD of information into their skulls in a VERY short time. They have a bit over a decade to learn several MILLENNIUM worth of human knowledge... It's not about raising them to be well adjusted adults individually, it's about creating the building blocks for the advancement of all mankind. Besides, kids learn best by doing generally, so putting them in rooms with strangers gives them plenty of opportunity to le…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:57 PM
2

Here's the thing though, them getting scared of you is completely their own fault and it is completely within their power to change that. You being sick of people being scared of you is NOT your fault and there isn't anything you can do to change that. The fact that people live in their own paranoid delusional world SHOULD NOT affect you in any way. If it does then the paranoid delusional are the ones doing something wrong, not you. I guess you can argue that it's not their fault because they ar…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:41 PM
7

Then they should ditch the poisoned well instead of continuing to drink from it. Stop identifying as feminist and choose something sane instead like egalitarian/humanitarian etc.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:30 PM
5

Yea, the last time I tried the "just walk away" approach I got a hockey stick in the back (the hard grass hockey kind, not the flimsy ice hockey kind). People don't try and initiate violence because they are polite and respectful.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:16 AM
5

Good on him, only thing else he could have done was inform everyone that if they didn't restrain her he would be forced to defend himself. Clearly nobody else had any interest in helping him so he had no choice but to do it himself. I do feel a little bad admitting it, but hearing her freak out when she suddenly realized that there were in fact repercussions to her actions was somewhat amusing. She obviously thought she had free reign to assault him in any way she wanted with impunity. The kid s…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:10 AM
1

ADD aside, that website is terrible and I actually couldn't get the video to play at all. I even tried using a plugin to rip the video from the browser memory, and that was after enabling every script on the site (there was a lot too).
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:26 AM
8

I have one close friend that I met by fighting in a parking lot of a mcdonalds. After beating each other down, we came out equal and have been friends since. You have an odd way of making friends. If we ever meet, think we could just settle for a firm handshake and polite chat?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:07 AM
1

Of you want a full on translation of math functions into typable format, check out latek or latex or something like that Just don't try to precision place images in that text whatever you do...
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:16 AM
55

Well it's probably using the same ridiculously broad and unreasonable definitions, but hey, fight fire with fire (or in this case, retard with more retard).
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:31 AM
5

I propose we appropriate the term rape culture, like feminists appropriated gender (which was synonomous with physical sex before, just a bit clearer because who the fuck knows if I'm talking about dangly bits between/not between legs or intercourse right now?). Every time they make up rape stories like this we can harp on about their rape culture till they become unable to use the word without getting attacked by plebs for being hateful, even if they are "using it correctly".
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:26 AM
1

the liberal arts college part is somewhat irrelevant, it's not unreasonable to expect average industry pay for a role, regardless of the affluence of the company. It isn't SMART negotiating because a liberal arts college is bound to be poor as fuck and not likely to pay at average or above rates, but that doesn't make it an unreasonable request, just not a smart one. The salaries you quote are pretty ambiguous as they seem to be an average over multiple regions, presumably in America. It's entir…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:58 AM
3

Assuming she did her research right, she was apparently asking for industry standard pay. The position of the institution to pay her that is another matter but it's not necessarily an unreasonable request (even if it could be unrealistic).
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:47 AM
3

Judging by the response she got, it's highly unlikely the kind of thing they would want from their lecturers. It sounds like one of those small community collage/polytechnic type places where they have much less of a focus on high achievement, research and the like and much more of a focus on "making sure everyone at least makes it to the end". They want the lecturers to be there for the kids, to mentor them and likely end up lecturing for a good portion of the entire multi-year program. Her wan…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:45 AM
1

Some do it more than others, and some focus on establishing the pecking order more than the practice aspects, usually those who feel their position is more threatened or see easy ways to escalate their position. Not saying these are good things, or the only way of doing things, just the likely reason why they do happen.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:06 AM
3

but it isn't "genetic" Not completely true, "play fighting" is common in many mammals as a way of preparing for the rigors of adulthood. It's a built in imperative to express casual aggressiveness towards others of similar stature both to practice your ability to hunt/fight to develop those skills so that we can successfully compete and prove ourselves the superior mate later in life (and it also establishes a pecking order, which is especially useful during feeding cause the dominant one goes f…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:02 PM
3

Ah, my bad. Not sure how I misread that. I blame gym exhaustion, shit is hard after 4 months off >.< That one earns a downvote sepukku
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:47 AM
3

It seems it was an issue of completely contrasting culture, she simply would not have worked at the place. it would be like a person trying to get a job at an armani suit retailer demanding they let them wear jandals, shorts, a wife beater and a sombrero to work. They clearly aren't suited to be an armani sales rep and no counter offer is going to change their lack of suitability.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:16 PM
5

A lot of small education isntitutes take a very student focused view of things, small calsses, lots of 1-1 time and not necesarrily on top academic achievement but getting kids who have difficulty with this stuff on the right track. They likely primarily wanted someone who would be there to mentor kids as much as possible but she asked for masses of time off and away from work which would make establishing relationships with those kids impossible (many of the courses probably have the same teach…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:13 PM
4

Basically they wanted her to be there to teach students and engage with them on a personal level, pretty common for small, less academic oriented isntitutes. She asked for more money, half a year off to have a baby, and another, unspecified and substantial period of time off (months to years) before she had been there long enough to achieve tenure (which is basically before she has been there long enough to make significant contribution to the institute, typically which leads to a professorship)…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:07 PM
2

That would be a womans suit with pants instead of a skirt I believe. I don't think there is any gender distinction on the general term "suit".
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:44 PM
1

I love the trade off here "you men all want to see yourselves as powerful warriors, well you should be an acrobat" Yea, those dudes (especially the guys who specialize in olympic rings) get their fuckin swole on. Being a competent acrobat requires enormous strength and endurance.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:01 AM
1

Ya know there are issues when you have a joke subreddit set up to make fun of /r/bodyacceptance, but most of the posts in it are actually real instances of "objectification" and inappropriate touching etc. or body image shaming (and not the "how dare he not find me attractive cause I'm 400lbs at 5ft nothin" kind). Poor swolebros, may brodin bless them with gainz.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:50 AM
2

I liked it when Tiff Needell was in it. Coincidentally Tiff was actually a racing driver with formula cart experience, he was both competent and qualified. Apparently accurately appraising cars on a car review show isn't useful though >.<. There was that fat dude who never said anything and whose name no one can remember too, but nobody cares about him.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:39 AM
8

Edit: You can down-vote, but their statement is still statistically false sauce plz
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:55 PM
1

technically they are making the decision yes, but with the average consumers intelligence ... sometimes I question if they can really be considered legally competent...
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:12 AM
0

consumers are making those choices free and clear. Except for the part where companies pay people to sit on places like reddit and act like one of them and try to convince them that wanting a better product is shameful and that they are whiny little douchbags for complaining about trivial things like shit not even working. It's called not buying their products. Unfortunately it doesn't mean much when the other 10000000 idiots are happy to get reemed cause "public opinion" tells them they are "en…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:44 AM
2

Most of the people she scammed are busy white knighting for her, not calling her out. Plenty did call her out, but they were silenced pretty heavily so most don't even bother now.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:57 AM
3

Actually, last I checked she wasn't a youtube affiliate and didn't run ads on her website, she just e-begged on it. Also, pedant mode activated, using copyrighted material without permission is NOT theft. It's just infringement of someone else's copyright. Theft requires the removal of someone else's possession. Copyright THEFT is something different and much more difficult to achieve. Agree with everything else though, she should be done for fraud and she sure as hell shouldn't be taken serious…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:41 AM
1

What, you think boy bands aren't just as controlled and manufactured as female pop artists? Anyone with a big label is pretty much a slave to the market research. The only people who manage to escape it are the tiny indies who get the market share to show it and the big old guys who just plain fucking CREATED the market in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:32 AM
1

That is the way it should be. Sometimes I think people are just too stupid for that responsibility. I've noticed over the last 10 years or so there has been a major shift to "this is what you like, and you will like it or your whiny and entitled" with companies dictating "what is hot" and then shaming consumers into going with that through abuse of social media. Consumer responsibility seems a lost concept on most these days and they outright say that we should be thankful our corporate overlord…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:30 AM
1

Did you mention that only being allowed to type with your toes or running around with no pants on screaming "bacon birds!" also adds diversity to the work place? While we are at it, HR needs some database analysts to be in charge of hiring nannies to do the monthly tax returns, cause last I checked Accounting only had accountants and could really benefit from the totally different perspective of a a childcare provider. Diversity for the sake of diversity is retarded. You hire whoever is best for…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:07 AM
1

I believe in some states it counts as pubic exposure and puts you ont the sex offender register.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:48 AM
0

Pffft, just because she wants you to GIVE her attention doesn't mean she wants to accept it. Silly man, learn 2 not rape women.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:48 AM
2

Eh, looks pretty ottermode to me. Could just be a freakishly big head throwing proportions WAAAYYY off, but in my experience the whole ottermode thing is what chicks are into these days and it fits more with the art style AND theme of the comic. Getting to a muscley enough for 99% of womens tastes isn't that hard for guys short of having a hormonal deficiency, if you are finding it hard then chances are pretty high you either aren't lifting heavy enough shit or you aren't shoving enough shit dow…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 11:01 AM
2

It's funny as well, cause I'm pretty sure in AHX the rape scene was depicted as a character defining moment that made ed nortons character completely change, and was depicted as a "positive experience" for him over all, exactly the kind of thing I have never seen for a woman but exactly what feminists always complain about... Also, I haven't seen any of those 13 movies, or even heard about them apart from the Slavador Dali one. I have heard of The Witcher 3 though, and have to say Geralt looks m…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:40 AM
3

Strong Objectivity, reality is irrelevant in the face of my feels shitlord.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:06 AM
1

Fuck, I live in one of the cheapest places in NZ and I would be paying like 3x what the do to share a single story, 3 bedroom house with 3+ other people, just in rent/utils. The average wage here is like 25-30k US as well. EDIT: And thats for places where the windows don't close properly, theres no working fireplace for the winter and the electrics are a potential fire hazard.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:12 PM
2

Oh, you didn't catch that episode of CSI last week where they finally caught the rapist mid act and then all dropped their pants and started masturbating furiously while high-fiving the guy? I swear it's like the same plot in ever show these days, even master chef.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:04 PM
35

Also, the re-drawn Batman still has a pretty muscular body which I imagine is hard to attain for anyone (like me) Actually, it's probably going for more the typical yaoi aesthetic I would say, in which case it's not particularly muscular, but it IS very low body fat so you still see definition. That is even harder to attain for most men I would say because not only does it require large amounts of exercise WITHOUT building muscle, but it also requires extreme diet control, especially to maintain…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:56 PM
4

It's pretty much a requirement when dealing with police these days :(
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:04 AM
4

I'm not sure why she had so many "work out slogan" shirts. I mean, how is working out a feminist issue? I can't think of a single guy who doesn't like it if a chick works out and it's a pretty well established fact that heavy squats are the best method for increasing the "dat ass" factor. I especially liked "cool story bro, now make me an equal member of society". BOOM! Now your an equal member of society, now get off your lazy ass and work like the rest of us have to. Of course, you have a few …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:36 AM
21

I dunno, I'd say being taught not to trust authority figures can be pretty valuable these days...
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:22 AM
1

But that was my point, you can't use subjective measures or people will just question it and complain, you need a set objective standard so there is no room for argument. You can't operate a business like that because you will constantly have to deal with people second guessing your assessments, refusing to pay because they don't like it and shit like that. If you simply say "people with dicks have to pay more" then it's cut and dry and there is no arguing. If they don't like it then they can ei…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:34 PM
1

A) I'm talking about lean mass (i.e ignoring fat), women are typically 20+% body fat, so they have VERY little muscule. You might have smaller outer dimensions, but when comparing lean mass I think you would be surprised how little muscle most women actually have. Not saying you definitely don't, it's entirely possible your a major outlier. Just that it's pretty unlikely and most people tend to severely underestimate the difference sex makes to this. B) Yes, I consider having clients go through …
/r/MensRights27/02/14 08:12 PM
3

Not to mention mandatory so you don't get treated like the spawn of satan just for suggesting one.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:04 AM
0

A) Unless you are REALLY skinny then you probably still have more muscle than the vast majoirty of women, it's just how testosterone works. B) Case by case is a landmine not worth dealing with. If you rely on individual assessment then individuals will just question your assessment. You need some cut and dry criteria and going by sex is much simpler and more practical than measuring surface area of each client to see if it passes some arbitrary threshold of "too big for standard price".
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:02 AM
1

Plenty, unless you make a pretty sweet income it's too fuckin expensive to have to pay for two people let alone a child as well.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 08:59 AM
3

Fuck, I'm not a fan of preachers for the most part, but that dude could have easily been crippled if he landed on that step wrong, or even killed... And on top of that it was painfully obvious he wasn't doing shit except for trying to fend of some nutter trying to get right in his face to anyone watching. The fact she was barely punished for what was a pretty serious assault is fucked up. The only thing more fucked up was her getting applauded at the end and lapping it up like some kind of marty…
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:06 AM
4

The appropriate response would be "you are both an embarrassment to those you represent, now I am leaving as I refuse to participate in this farce and you will be receiving notice from my lawyers about this assault".
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:58 AM
5

They should spend more time lobbying and doing good things then instead of letting the nutbags fuck everything up in their name.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:40 AM
1

No idea bout that part sorry.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:47 AM
1

What I am noticing that the MR get mad when feminism get a poster with some men saying they can stop rape. I can understand that you get mad, because men gets blamed and they are the greater group that commit rape. This is bad because their literature implies ONLY men rape and that it is an inherently masculine trait that ALL men exhibit. That it is OUR responsibility to ensure womens safety and wellbeing and that they should not bare any responsibility for themselves or their actions what so ev…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:14 AM
13

Basically she made a big stink a bout a couple of guys a few rows behind her at some tech conference making a dumb joke privately about dongles and "forking" repositories. She posted their pictures on the internet accused them of sexual harrasment and blamed all of womens troubles on them, rah rah patriarchy misogynist blaa blaa and all that (ya know, feeling it was her job to police everyone and everything), then got at least one of them fired and made everybody in the tech industry hate her (w…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:01 AM
9

She was a Customer relations manager I believe, not actually involved in much tech work herslef (although presumably the role required at least some familiarity of it). Thats why she got fired, she literally did the opposite of her job with her little hissy fit and made everyone NOT want to deal with her company for fear she would name and shame them on the internet over irrelevant stuff.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:57 AM
3

I dunno, it feels like it's changed significantly to me in the last decade or so, hence why we have middle aged women getting all excited over twilitght and ottermode swimmers and soccer players are all the rage. I mean, for all it's satire, /r/swoleacceptance could easily be full of real life stories with no real way to tell. Planet Fitness doesn't have the "lunk alarm" thing because all the women on treadmills and exercycles there like to check out the muscular dudes in the power racks. I also…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:49 AM
0

Would it hurt? No. Is it needed? Also No. April Ryan from The longest Journey is one of my most favorite protagonists in gaming (and it's a one of my top 5 games), but that has nothing to do with her gender and everything to do with her being well written and realistic. I don't really care about the gender of a character I play so long as it's a good role. Hell, I tend to pick female characters in RPG's as a form of power gaming as they are almost always exactly the same as male characters but t…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:57 AM
9

Stuff like this confuses me. Men always get painted as peados, but it always seems to be women that are attracted to men with the physique of pre-pubecent boys...
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:48 AM
4

Kids these days, no appreciation for subtlety. Is this truly what trolling has become? Carrot Top/10 would not bite.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:41 AM
2

I don't think the information in this article is all that surprising to anyone who has existed in reality for the last while and pays attention. It's a shame the methodology is pretty flimsy though, their classification isn't very descriptive and potentially very prone to misclassification.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:09 AM
3

Cunt is actually a wonderfully versatile word. Here in NZ (and AUS too) it's just as often used as a term of endearment between mates (what straight guy doesn't love cunt after all).
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:02 AM
0

If you think that is a reasonable expectation for every man then you must think we all have SHITLOADS of free time, and probably easy access to steroids too. Getting to that size takes YEARS of hours a day, consuming in excess of 3500 calories a day on bulk/cut cycles and requires frequent lifting just to maintain. You also probably aren't going to attain that kind of shape simply because of genetics, a lot of people simply don't have the small hips and broad shoulders for that look. Most men si…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:34 PM
-1

they did not claim to be 'nerds' or 'geeks'. No, but they claimed to be gamers, which is like my grandma claiming to be a racing car driver because she had a peugot 309 and they made a "goodwood" version of it. I don't think they ever did claim to be hardcore gamers. Are you fucking kiding me? How do you think CoD and Halo, probably the 2 most casual shooters in the industry became 2 of the biggest competitive games despite sucking horribly at it? They thought they were hardcore MLG 420 blaze it…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:47 AM
3

Can confirm. been gaming since the 80's, have formally given up all hope on the culture. Completely disenfranchised because of the massive influx of ignorant people who do not care or want to care about games, simply consume cause it's the cool thing to do that started around 2000. I still buy indie titles and there is always the odd bigger game like The Witcher or Portal that tickles my fancy, but I'm lucky if more than 2-3 releases a year really get me more than mildly interested.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:14 AM
1

Really? You've met fake geek guys? I haven't, ever. Really? Were you living under a rock between 2000 and 2006ish or were you just like 5 or something? The whole frat boy/Bro gamer was a massively detested and ridiculed demographic around the time the xbox first became popular and continued into the early 360 days. Those were the fake gamer guys and we fucking hated them at the time. They claimed to be hardcore gamers but had no knowledge or appreciation for the medium, and they got treated just…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:08 AM
2

+/u/PayPaltip @/u/3G6A5W338E 100 PayPals
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:10 AM
1

I wonder if they have ever stopped to consider that because of societal pressures on men to perform and not show weakness then when a man gets a "man cold" it's because he's REALLY fuckin sick and probably actually has the flu or something, otherwise he would just shrug it off and go to work (which is actually very irresponsible, it not only compromises his health but that of his co-workers). But no, it's far more satisfying to denigrate men and claim female superiority.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:02 AM
2

Never mind the assumption thats what he is even doing (and not wondering why the crazy bitch is staring daggers at him for no fucking reason) or that there is even something particularly wrong with seeking admiration and/or acknowledgment as reward for the effort you put in.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:05 AM
7

The other day several women in my office, one of whom was a co-worker were cackling about male sterilization with meat cleavers. The amount of joy they seemed to be deriving from said conversation was somewhat unsettling. The real kicker was that it was in the context of designing a course for nursing education...
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:37 AM
2

It's not just govt grants, these people are often very well educated but the wages and quality of living in their countries are fucking terrible. They will do anything to get to immigrate to a decent country and companies will act as sponsors to help them gain acceptance to immigrate. Plenty of people get into countries like this (because they aren't likely to take them if they aren't already proving they will be productive to the country) and IT happens to be one of the most common fields too. …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:02 AM
1

Yea, and a lot of low level grunts at support firms think they are hot shit and call them selves high skilled because they can do basic windows admin stuff. My point was that it's way to vague a term to be using when trying to be informative about why we should take the information as authoritative (ignoring the logical fallacy in that anyway).
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:46 AM
1

I dunno, doesn't the defense get to veto x amount of randomly selected jurors, allowing them to effectively rig the jury anyway?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:44 AM
1

Honestly, it scares me that ANYBODY from the general population could be on a jury. The average person isn't exactly known for being smart or caring about stuff...
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:34 PM
8

But you were just complaining about how there were too many white males? Now your admitting that non white-males are over represented? I'm confused, your not making much sense... IT, whatever you want to call it. My job isn't to mince words, it's to code, hack(in the pentesting sort of way) do forensics, and find criminals. So your what, a networking security specialist that also does computer forensics? Your job might not be to mince words, but communication requires being clear and making sens…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:32 PM
29

I'm going to be honest, you come off extremely poorly with that post. With attitudes like my parents, I can see why women aren't in tech What the fuck does your parents not wanting to buy a computer have to do with women? They wouldn't buy a computer because the didn't want their daughter getting exposed to "technology" or something? More likely they didn't see the value in it or thought it would "rot your brain" or something. I'm a guy and my parents were ALWAYS telling me to get off the comput…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:14 PM
3

I think that means that they sometimes have to use command prompts n stuff... Seriously though, I've never known of any particularly important roles that still call themselves "IT". IT is a term reserved for desktop support and maybe minor hardware jobs like replacing video cards that have died etc., any serious role tends to get up under the Engineering umbrella, network/systems engineering, software engineering etc. As someone who has both studied and done work in "a highly technical area of I…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:48 PM
3

What? You mean mean authors create characters in order to fulfill a role within a narrative? And that narrative isn't always some straight white males disguised rape fantasy? Pfft, where'd you learn about literature, a non-gender studies class? Maybe I write a song about extreme fundamentalists plotting some kind of attack, and getting away with that. Am I a terrorist now? Haha, NSA got you now! Your writing about being someone who writes about being a terrorist. you Meta-Terrorist!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:12 PM
1

I always just took at as being about chicks playing coy. Sounds to me like it's about a chick who's being all flirty and making it obvious she's keen but is then all like "tee hee, thats naughty... I'm a good girl, I wouldn't do naughty things"
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:08 PM
3

Good for you, now imagine you did care Re-read that part. Imagine for a second that you DID want your foreskin. That it was a big deal to you. How would that make you feel, knowing all the shit you would have to go through to correct their mistake. Or if you prefer, imagine they decided that you needed john 3:16 tatooed on your forehead. Would you be happy about that? I bet you would be pissed at them for doing that to you (and tatoos are a hell of a lot cheaper and easier to correct than circuc…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:09 PM
0

Good for you, now imagine you did care... now what? Part of your dick was cut off that you want back and it will probably cost you thousands of dollars, if not tens of thousands, years of embarrassment dealing with doctors about your dick, possibly surgery or at the very least wearing uncomfortable devices, you will have to explain this all to girlfriends etc. etc. and for what? Cause of some stupid religious shit? Cause your mother thought it would make your dick look better to her? There is no…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 10:47 PM
1

It's funny because we all know he isn't going to get raped in prison. He probably wont even spend more than a couple of days there before going on "home detention". Even if he did spend any decent length in prison he would just pay his body guard to stay with him probably, and it would be allowed. It also doesn't help Beibers case that he's an absolute douchenozzle and nobody likes him.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 10:25 PM
-1

You say, okay, so you admit to making shit up. Conversation done then, I win, have fun being delusional. Then you leave. The only way to "win" and argument with a feminist is to not have it. If you argue with feminisim them everyone loses. It's like with creationism and how anyone with a reputation refused to have a "debate" with guys like kirk cameron and ray comfort, by agreeing to it you only give them the appearance of being a valid position. Best you can do is openly mock their stupidity so…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:18 AM
2

Truth is highly biased towards being correct, should we ignore it because of it's inherent bias? Not saying the link is correct, but just because it comes from a biased source doesn't mean it's invalid. You should review the material, bias and all and then make a judgment on the veracity of it's claims. Bias is irrelevant if you recognise the difference between valid claims and invalid claims.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:20 AM
0

I hope these become a huge hit. They will make excellent warning signs for who to stay away from. Soon as you see them; "Sorry, changed my mind, have a nice night, bye".
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:11 PM
5

Dunno why you would expect any kind of dialog with those crazies. I received about 100 downvotes in a DOA post that only like 3 other people had commented on for daring to suggest that rape doesn't HAVE to involve sex (and I even provided etymological evidence to support my claim), and that was only in response to the other people asking if a vampire sucking blood could be considered rape (was some stupid post in /r/games about a scene from the upcoming castlevania game where it shows the main c…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:58 PM
1

I find chicks prefer skinny guys, just with really unhealthily low bodyfat to make their little muscles still viable. I'm not a small guy by any means, but I'm not herculean either, and I REALLY have a hard time finding jeans. Shelves start at "regular for maybe 1 column or 2, and then the next 15 columns are slim and below. I currently have to wear pants about 4" too big for my waist just so I can walk up stairs without them ripping. "Ottermode" seems to be what most chicks dig these days. EDIT…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:42 PM
3

Yup, must be guilt for all the poor girls/minorities we raped and stopped from getting educations and good jobs etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:00 PM
9

On the one hand, the guy did deserve to get knocked the fuck out, on the other, there are a billion better ways she could have handled the situation. Plus, the move they were demonstrating could easily cause brain damage or even be lethal if inappropriately used, it's extremely irresponsible to advertise stuff like that, ESPECIALLY because we all know that someone is going to be stupid enough to try and follow the instructions, possibly leaving someone a vegetable.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:29 AM
5

Don't tell Mattie Brice that, didn't you know "the man" has been keeping her out of mmaking games by stopping her from attending universities or getting access tot he tools. Apparently being a minority/woman means you can't google "download UDK/Unity" or "UDK/Unity tutorial" like all the indie guys who make games.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:24 AM
1

Ah, sorry, misread it. Yea, general anesthetic is hospital only.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:25 AM
1

depends on the teeth, I had a local and they just yanked the thing straight out and I walked out with a little gauze to chew on and the tooth in a bag so I could show people why cavities are bad (the tooth wisdom tooth was dead, no root, and had imploded from a cavity because I couldn't clean it properly due to it being smooshed up against my jaw tendon). The inside of a tooth is surprisingly soft and pulpy. you need a surgeon if they are severely impacted and haven't come through etc. though, o…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:55 PM
0

Might stop then spending money on stupid shit that will have no effect. I'm just saying that functionally there is no real difference between this new one and the old one and it's very obvious, it's a blatant waste of time/money drafting such ineffectual changes. If anything the new one is WORSE than the old one specifically for women because it could be read that only woman need equality, and thus men could get all sorts of legal privileges and/or as long as all women are equally disadvantaged …
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:15 AM
1

Funny thing is, I'm actually only mildly interested in cars. My mates the one who's nutty about them so I mostly know everything I do by listening to him constantly going on about it :P Full credit goes to him for the GTO build too, the setup was all his idea and he did all the maths for working out the right parts to use. It wasa ctually surprisingly simple, especially compared to the 500hp (soon to be 700hp) rover he built (and is now smooshing a bigger turbo into because the 2L 4 in it is too…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:33 AM
1

Considering I can get performance that should probably be illegal on the street for around the price of a brand new bottom range honda, yes. Yes it is pretty fuckin sweet :p Should be able to pull well over 1G round corners on road legal tires (well, on some corners anyway, NZ roads are terrible and it'd probably get airborne on most) and Go from 0-150mph faster than most cars get to 60. Hardest part of it all is working out how to fit the new engine in, its a good few inches taller, probably wi…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:41 PM
1

Indeed, although it can be hard to improve some physical attributes without invasive surgery and the like, which is pretty unreasonable to expect of people. But like I said, you minimize your shortcomings that you can't do anything about by maximizing other attributes which you can. People care too much about what they cant have, makes them forget about what they can. I can't afford a ferrari, but I can build a mitsi GTO to be faster than a veyron and probably better handling than a ferarri for …
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:52 PM
3

because of demographic majorities. The whole fucking point is to quickly and clearly identify an approximate visual appearance of someone. Saying they are non east asian doesn't mean shit because that includes like 95+% of the country. It does not contain any useful information. America used to be almost entirely european or african in decent, having white/black worked perfectly well because in 99% of cases you fell into one category or the other. Now thats not so true because there are a lot of…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:48 PM
3

NAL: I'd look into getting a restraining order, it's pretty hard to spin one of those around on you and it means you don't have to deal with her any more (unless she wants jail time).
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:42 PM
2

Actually it did include women, but there were a lot of extra requirements that led to them generally being excluded (along with many men too). The primary one was being poor back then, you don't pay enough taxes to meaningfully contribute, you don't GET to meaningfully contribute. That was the way it worked back then. Gender was irrelevant, only money. Coincidentally, women got a whole bunch of rights, men didn't get a lot of that, at least until later when monarchies and the like became irrelev…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:39 PM
2

Added sentence is redundant, law changes nothing and thus is a waste of taxpayer money. Muricans should demand a refund of all money spent changing that.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:36 PM
2

URL and self post text cannot go together. You can either submit a link and then comment on it or make a text self post, not both. I don't know why reddit doesn't let you add an initial comment though and just not have the URL for selfs, it would make more sens and avoid this shit.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:29 PM
3

You completely missed my point.. Do you see why this is ridiculous? For starters, the vast majority of your east asian countries are in the south of asia, vietnam/cambodia are more westrn on the map than the majority of indonesia (the only southern asian place in your southern asia list). And how is pakistan south asian when it is level with central china (the most northern asian country) and shares a border with it? As for having never seen a fijiian, I live in fucking New Zealand, there are po…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:27 PM
1

Her "review" of bayonetta made it painfully clear what her kickstarter series would be like long before it ever happened. Games bout a single mother who is insanely powerful, beats the shit out of countless people and completely owns her sexuality, pretty much a feminist icon, but sarkesian only sees "oh, she is sexualy appealing (ignoring freakishly small head and ridiculously long legs), must be sexist crap. Even her own fans chewed her out on it till she took the vid down. She's a gamer like …
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:10 PM
3

No money in integrity sadly :( people prefer drama over reality.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:05 PM
2

Best you can do really is identify them and try and help them out in subtle ways. Getting rid of modern feminisim is a good start because all it does it teach people that they are less than perfect or competent and it is everyone elses job to make you feel like something your not and anyone who doesn't is a terrible person who is the enemy of all mankind. Instead we should be teaching them that not everyone gets to be #1, if your not the best in one area work on something else, change what you c…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:03 PM
5

I bet if you got put infornt of a panel you probably couldn't even get 100% correct on your own categories, there is a lot of overlap of visual identifiers in many regions, especially as a result of colonizations (Polynesians of indian decent etc.). Hell, You could take someone from Fiji and most people probably wouldn't be able to tell if they were middle eastern (pakistani), east asian (India I guess, you don't really have a good descriptor for that area), or their actual nationality (which te…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:31 PM
3

I don't know why you someone downvoted you. (It was probably the feminist type you were describing.) probably the reddit auto bot that fudges the vote counts over time (total stays true eventually ) to make it harder for spam bots to pick popular comments/posts to spam from but to me it was just appreciation of beautiful women and I didn't see nothing wrong with it. But to others it's a reminder of their own lack of attractiveness and makes them feel uncomfortable and insecure. I would try to av…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:06 PM
3

wouldn't it technically be missing a "u"? I mean, just because the font is inaccurate doesn't mean that letter magically becomes "doublevee" :p In other news, the english alphabet (and lagunage) is retarded.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:57 PM
1

I think that one tells enough to make an educated guess though, give it's size and position I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess it's from a pin for holding together a shattered wrist (as in a really fubar'd one that will probably have lasting mobility problems, not a hairline fracture or anything).
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:33 PM
1

I'm not saying everyone needs to be protected from everything at all times, just that you need sensible limits instead of "post factum" limits like you seem to be advocating or shit breaks down because people are stupid and will constantly cross those limits to everyones detriment unless they are specifically told they cant (within reason, it shouldn't impose on other rights like being able to tell someone you think they are a cock cause it would hurt their feelings). This is all irrelevant to t…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:11 AM
0

Not american, nor a particularly big fan of America. Jefferson quotes don't really mean much to me. As for the quote it's self, in context it seems somewhat contradictory in this day and age. Like I said, people are retarded, they quite literally need to be told what to do or think or they get antsy because they have no idea how to come to decisions on their own. Again I'll allude to the consumer market, not to mention the current state of most bigger democracies. They got fucked up by the peopl…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:20 AM
1

At which point you just say fuck government and go full anarchy. People are too stupid for an anarchic utpoia to ever work though, idiots would be murdering left right and center, blowing shit up etc. etc. I'd be happy for total anarchy if I trusted everyone else, but I don't. You just have to look at pretty much any market and see how the consumers (who are supposed to hold all the power) constantly get royally fucked over. When you try and bring it to their attention they just say "if you don'…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:21 AM
4

People in any society have a right to not to needlessly be put in danger. Getting plastered and then driving is needlessly endangering other peoples safety. You have countless other options, get a taxi, walk, get a ride from a sober mate, get a motel room for the night, find somewhere else to crash that you don't need to drive to. Obviously I'm not going to the whole "you need to be locked in a box for your own safety" retardedness, but people are really fucking stupid, at some stage you just pl…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:32 AM
2

I disagree for one simple reason: Intent. If you get shitfaced then you go driving you know there is a pretty damn good change you will fuck up and cause some damage/hurt someone. It's something you CHOOSE to risk. You are violating peoples right to safety by driving drunk and knowingly putting them at risk. Otherwise it would be fine to go into a crowded mall and shoot a gun randomly as long as you didn't hit anyone or damage anything. I imagine the though process is similar in this case with t…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:21 AM
0

I agree with the the base concept of "gender" in that it separates social views of how men and women should behave from physical aspects of sexual dimorphism. I HATE the way it gets used 90% of the time though. For starters, I'm pretty sure the word gender has existed a lot longer than the modern feminist concept of "gender" has, so it annoys me that they try and hijack an existing word, obfuscating it's meaning (which as far as I am aware has always been synonymous with sex) and hinder communic…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:43 AM
3

Poor black women :'( Ain't nobody like them
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:04 PM
3

No, it says the officers have to judge it by who is the most "physically imposing and capable" or something along those lines. The vast majority of the time that would be men because of sexual dimorphism and things like testosterone etc. which cause higher muscle growth and height etc. You a big manly man? Your crazy (hopefully now ex) gf stabs you? Your goin to jail because you could have been able to beat the shit out of her if you wanted to. Also, go looe at the duluth model website. It's ent…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:59 PM
1

I'm no expert on law, but I believe for something to be slander/libel it needs to be baseless? I'm pretty sure if you have reasonable but inconclusive evidence that could make for an acceptable defense. Also pretty sure it has to be a public statement.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:43 PM
2

What I don't get is the constantly yammer on about it being all "socially constructed" etc., but then you ask them why being gay/trans isn't a choice if you were essentially "tricked into it" by your upbringing and they go bonkers at you. Whats so hard to believe about there being genetic predispositions to things that affect who you are?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:24 PM
1

Thats definitely a big part of it, but of course she would just shoot back with "well why save a woman? why not save a man?" while ignoring the obvious answer that it was men making the games and they didn't want to go off rescuing dudes int heir imaginary worlds, they wanted to rescue princesses. Then she gets to go on about how it's misogyny for men to be conditioned into being disposable and how women have higher value placed on them in society. It's a no win situation really.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 01:43 AM
4

There is only one thing I disagree with her on, and that is the idea that at least Anitas videos will make developers think more about cliched story telling. It really wont. They don't write these stories because they don't know it's a terrible cliched mess, they write them because it's quick and easy. Either it's cause they are lazy or they just plain don't care. Either way Anita's videos are of no use. I mean, who the hell doesn't recognize the most basic and worn tropes of story telling over …
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:46 AM
1

I don't think a particularly big deal, it's more of a negative reflection of the women who feel the need to go there I think. Although, having said that... If I were a women I would go to an all chicks gym, free and unfettered access to the squat rack/bench? FUCK YEA! 'aint nothin make good booty like dem squatz.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:12 AM
1

Yea, jokes on the feminists, that "power pose that threatens men" chick in the white full body suit still turned me on. I think I've been hitting the gym a bit much or something though, all I thought when looking at the black chick was "girl needs to do some squats". EDIT: Oh wait, apparently that was the point, I guess I should no better than to assume a feminist would ever think a woman could be depicted in an appropriate manner. Her assessment is completely wrong though, I didn't find bodysui…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:01 AM
2

The Maori were the native people when NZ was colonized They were about as native as murdering everyone that was there before you can make you...
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:35 AM
1

The going dark and victim tour for sure, dunno bout the banning contributors. She really is taking her sweet time.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:43 AM
3

Yea, I remember seeing some video about how hard it is to be a woman/trans/minority indie developer because "the patriarchy" or whatever is actively trying to prevent them from making games. NO IT FUCKING ISN'T. Any numpty can download Unity or UDK or whatever and google the youtube tutorials etc. It's how every fucking guy does it pretty much. Nobody really gives a fuck if your a black trans woman, if you make a good game people will want to play it. Absolutely nobody can do anything to stop yo…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:54 AM
4

I agree there are double standards about depictions of violence, but we shouldn't be pointing out "hey, why is this okay?" because it's obvious why it's okay. We should instead be pointing out "hey, why isn't this okay" when the genders are flipped. Instead of insisting on holding everything to the same level of retardation we should be pushing for feminists to start being more reasonable in their appraisal of things.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:20 AM
2

There was plenty of violence perpetrated in that ad by everyone against everyone, none of it was particularly gendered. Lets not turn into feminism and cry about every depiction of everything being misandry here. If anything it was just a shock value joke because it's certainly not what you would expect.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 09:55 AM
6

To be fair, I think I have nail clippings worth more than that lot.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:18 AM
1

Oh yea, there was that too, and probably worse.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:45 AM
5

The series is about "tropes" in videogames and is supposed to talk about how they are harmful to women but instead is mostly bitching about how it's because men are (consciously or subconsciously) trying to oppress women and not allow them to enjoy video games etc. etc. it was merely sold on a platform of "see, all gamers are misogynists!". Her arguments are all pretty flawed and tend to blatantly ignore the logic behind decisions in favor of assuming it's because men hate women.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 07:16 AM
1

All of this points to the idea of reducing men's sentences, however this would also include reducing the sentences of existing Murderers, Rapists, and other high felony criminals Or we could do it by not throwing people in jail for stupid shit. I think you would find that if society and lawmaking were more fair and egalatarian then a lot less people would be in jail total and the gender split would reduce a great deal. It would probably still swing in favor of men, mostly because they are not he…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:52 AM
8

TL;DR - girl goes on kickstarter asking for money to make some videos that she probably would have made for free anyway about how games are evil hate-filled misogyny. Some guys point out she has already clearly demonstrated she doesn't know shit about games and doesn't deserve the money, others just troll her for lulz. She has a cry about evil misogny and white knights pour in, donating over 100k. A year later she has made 2 (or is it 3? I forget/don't care) videos out of 12, clearly put no effo…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:41 AM
1

I addressed this a bit further on I'm pretty sure, it's likely all part of the narrative structure. First season focuses primarily on the arcs being about introduction of themes and characters, second is about setting up and framing the premise for MC growth (in this case pointing out that Korra acts like a bitch and it constantly results her or someone/thing else getting fucked up), then s3 is about her realizing this and addressing it and s4 is about her completing the transformation and makin…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:03 AM
1

consequences aren't necessarily synonymous with punishment I'd say getting locked in a tin box, nearly having the thing that defines who you are taking away from you, nearly losing friends and loved ones etc. etc. are all pretty synonimous with punishment. The only reason that the show seems light handed is because the punishments she get threatened with are generally "game over" scenarios, if they followed through on the threat there wouldn't be any show left. Thats why the end of season 1 ende…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:44 AM
1

I disagree that Korra rarely faces consequences for her actions. They aren't overly long lasting, but since when did people have patience and appreciate proper pacing these days anyway? She regularly ends up getting her ass kicked, losing support of her friends and even SPOILER:::::got her ass dumped for being a bitch (will be interesting to see if it sticks)::::::::. It's clearly her character arc to start off as a impulsive, inconsiderate and impetuous child and then slowly realize how it keep…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:31 AM
1

Height is less a factor than weight, if you are 5'6 and 180lbs then you will likely be a lot stronger than someone 6' and 180lbs (assuming same body fat and bone density etc) simply cause of the fact you will have higher muscle mass. If you are benching more than guys 50lbs up on you then you are doing well. It's probably either better physical conditioning, better neural activation (can play a really big role in strength) or perhaps they do too much isolation work and thus the stabalizing muscl…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:55 AM
1

Think about it, your strength is determined by your muscle mass (plus some other stuff which we shall conveniently ignore). Your body weight is muscle plus skeleton and organs etc. For a given height your skeletal and organ mass is pretty much the same across everyone (+- a bit cause of gender, phenotype etc.) The only part that really changes is fat weight (which you can generally ignore for this cause fat people tend not to hit the gym much until you get to the EXTREME strong end of the scale)…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:14 AM
2

She can bench her bodyweight, thats probably a decent amount more than most people regardless of gender, especially considering as you get lighter your bodyweight is proportionally less composed of muscle. She's no seasoned male powerlifter, but for a 140lb 5'4 chick she is doing pretty damn well. I mean, can you find an example of a 140lb woman lifting substantially more than that?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:44 AM
5

He still seems to imply rape and domestic violence are things that only ever happen to women Where? I've never heard him say anything like that. If you are commenting on how he hasn't really talked about it, it's probably because it's never really come up. Theres no point in bringing up tangentially related things in a debate because it is exactly that, tangentially related. To do so is to confuse and water down your own argument. Plus I don't think he really considers himself an MRA, he just th…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:38 AM
2

I would have just gone with balls and boobs. Women don't carry books under their arms cause because said space is often occupied by the sides of their tits, making it somewhat awkward and uncomfortable. Most men sit with their legs apart because hot sweaty squished up balls = not fun.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:20 AM
1

Women buy these products, men do not tell them in mass to get them. I have NEVER heard a guy say a women needs to wear more makeup. I HAVE heard them say plenty that they should wear less.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:20 AM
0

Well, technically thats any time since they stopped since it's past tense (muttmonster remembers when they USED to, they used to 5 seconds ago and I remember then fine), so it could be any time in the last however long it's been. It's actually a perfectly consistent statement, although I imagine that was more by accident than anything :p
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:52 AM
26

Some feminist thinks that having strong personal opinions based on personal experiences (also known as BIAS) makes you more objective than someone who is being purely objective and looking at facts only. I guess it's a formalization of "you haven't experienced it so you can't comment on it".
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:54 AM
2

In fact, 80% of men are below average (according to women) I actually find the OKCupid blog strangely fascinating. They have all sorts of stats that highlight aspects of human behavior. It makes for a good read (and sometimes a depressing one like this time).
/r/MensRights21/09/13 11:43 PM
1

i have tried lower dpi but never really liked it i use a claw hold... This is the usual response. It definately takes a month or so of adjusting too before it starts to feel natural and you start to "take" to it, and you will probably need to start palming if you start going north of 8"/360. There is a reason that like 90% of comp fps players play at 8-15"/360 (and almost all the rest are higher) though. I also used to claw grip and play at 4000 DPI and high ingame sens (I think around 6-7 in so…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:36 AM
1

To elaborate on the "a good mouse" part: DON'T get a laser mouse, they are almost universally worse than optical ones. They pretty much all suffer from erratic and unpredictable, inconsistent acceleration. Good mice are ones that use sensors like the Avago ADNS-3060/3090 or ADNS 3888/3988. Lets just say there is a reason people love mice like the Razer Deathadder or Logitech MX518. Also, get your sens right, you want AT LEAST 4"/360, preferably more like 8+ (most good players are 12-15 for twitc…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:48 AM
1

They would get so steaming mad because i would end up decimating them I'd be mad too if the best fight you could put up netted you a 0.1 K:D. /jk They could bairly use my high dpi mouse Sorry, this is my trigger for "hasn't seen the light yet" mode. Funny story, most high DPI mice (generally anything above 3500 DPI) use vastly inferior sensors. Most game engines also lack the practical sensitivity setting ranges to make use of more than about 1600 DPI. People like to claim sensitivity is persona…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:42 AM
0

Couldn't possibly be "you don't hve to be a fan [of video games] to make a vid [about video games], because it's not a fanboy [of video games] type of thing" in a talk about how she is making videos about video games even though she doesn't like video games because you don't have to like video games to make a video about video games? She is either a terrible communiator (which is ironic cause she has a BA in communication studies) or she was actually talking about video games as a whole. You can…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:14 AM
2

First of all, no, the OP said that anytime there is three girls and 1 guy, the 1 guy is toast. That's not true Again, I don't think you understand generalizations. It's not supposed to be taken as a literal "every single time without fail", otherwise we wouldn't be able to say shit like "if you drop the ball it will fall down" cause if your in space, for example, then it won't (there isn't even a "down" in space, hell, down isn't even a real, quantifiable vector, it changes based on your positio…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:11 AM
2

I think you were missing my point. Your example PROVES his point with the whole "ALL FEMALE alliance" thing. The fact they finally self destructed at the end is kinda inconsequential when they spend the entire show proving the point otherwise, and was the reason I said to read up on generalizations. When someone makes a generalization it doesn't have to hold true 100% of the time, just a significant portion of it, and when they spend 99% of the show largely voting out men because they are men an…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:06 AM
4

You should probably consider for a second how the final 7 got to have only 1 man in it in the first place... Also, you should probably read up on generalizations.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 09:17 AM
2

The real question is, even if it did happen is it really something to be particularly worried about? Having to wade through the shit to find legit emails/replies would be the biggest concern I would think. The odds of anyone making a "death threat" actually following through are pretty much the same as your chance of randomly getting hit by a car when you go out. In fact, I'm pretty sure being involved in a car accident is WAY more likely than any of that, but I don't see them breaking down with…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:31 AM
4

Indeed. This exactly the problem with this fear mongering behavior, it gets people hysterical and then they abandon all logic and you end up with all sorts of stupid decisions being made as a result.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:25 AM
9

Because like the very first thing out of the womans mouth (paraphrased) is "I'm very blessed to have never been harrased, even though I'm a prolific public speaker".
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:27 AM
1

Did you not bother clicking the link? Yes, and it doesn't explicitly say much other than "we had a team of lawyers to cover our ass". In what universe? This one. Publishing rights and IP rights are VERY different things. One covers someone elses property, the other is your own. If someone complains that you are publishing a portion of material they have publishing rights to and the person owning the IP says it's all good and you aren't actually PUBLISHING the material then the court probably wou…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:48 AM
1

That is an incredibly vague statement. What parts where covered under fair use? The film excerpts that went with the interviews of said films creators about how they were shafted? They might not have been able to license those from from the publishers who held the PUBLISHING rights, but getting the all clear from the people who hold the IP rights would likely override that. Was it the bits they took from other movies to contrast the absurdity of the ratings system? It was likely the latter, and …
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:17 PM
2

And I'll bet they requested express permission before using all of it. It was probably given gladly too because most of the films shown were by people who also spoke in that documentary and who that documentary was supporting...
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:34 PM
2

NZ seems generally on the ball with this issue I dunno, National is on shaky ground right now cause of this GSCB spying BS, doubt Key will get back in again. If National doesn't pick a new leader for the next election it's quite possible Labour+Greens will get back in, and then it's gender quotas for seats in parliament and women being able to request salary information of male colleges (but not vice versa) and all that other good stuff.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:26 PM
1

From memory the discrepancies were ~5% for the male academics, you could put that down to just about anything, it could be random noise for all we know. You could even argue it's justified given legal requirements for maternal leave etc. making female employees generally more expensive and riskier. The female academics were more like 30% which is pretty damn high. It's also questionable that this has anything to do with STEM subjects in particular or if it's a common occurrence in many fields (w…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:36 AM
2

Instead of simply reading the potentially biased summary of findings in the abstract I looked at the actual data it's self (it's usually a good idea when you read stuff on heavily loaded topics like this). There was a table at the top of a page around the middle that constitutes pretty much the results of the entire experiment. It had the hire-ability evaluation broken down by gender (and something else from memory, maybe age) and the estimated starting pay. Male professors rated the female stud…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:30 PM
2

However, a study like this one[1] is a direct rebuttal to the idea there is no discrimination against women in STEM I believe I have read that study. From memory the vast majority of the "discrimination" was actually done by FEMALE professors. They also undervalued the male applicants too. At the end of the day, if you think women are actively pushed away from STEM fields, you clearly aren't paying attention. There are endless advertising campaigns and scholarships for them just because they hav…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:22 AM
3

There are some pretty cool cats in the cosplay crowd it seems. Fanservice Renji did a video on it too, and most of them seem pretty reasonable about their complaints.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:42 AM
18

I dunno if you can really call her a master troll... She probably got talked into spending WAY more than she intended to out of indignant and irrational rage.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:11 AM
90

I would argue she was the rude one. She clearly had no idea what she wanted and was wasting both his AND the store clerks time. If she had any decency she would have let the guy go first (which would have given her time to make her mind up, everyone wins) and cost her maybe 30 seconds tops. Simply getting to the front of the queue first is not justification to waste other peoples time. He was well within the right to give her shit for it IMO.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:17 AM
1

That guy is completely incomparable, he is probably like 20% bodyfat vs colemans 6 or so... Show me what that guy looks like at 6% bf if you want an honest comparison. He's also wearing a shirt and not attempting to emphasize his lats, it's not really a good comparisona t all. Ronnie Coleman used injections for competition. His muscles weren't actually that large. Specifically his legs. Irrelevant, the dude can squat 800 fucking pounds MULTIPLE TIMES. You said that they weren't actually strong, …
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:19 PM
2

More fun facts, from the front you should be able to see 4 of the chambers, thus if you can see the bullet you are safe. If you can't then it's either at the top or the bottom, time to commence pants shitting.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:45 PM
1

I dunno what body builders you have been looking at, but GOOD body builders do NOT have small legs... or even waistline. It's true that bodybuilding is about aesthetics and not strength, but that doesn't mean these guys are even close to weak. Roids have nothing to do with weakness either, they make getting strong EASIER. Thats why they are universally banned in all professional sports. Good bodybuilders might not be toe to toe with strongmen and powerlifters, but they are still really fuckin st…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:42 PM
-1

i.e. what the woman's family pays the husband when they get married Pretty sure it's the other way around, the husband or his family pay the womans family. EDIT: never mind, I'm just too old fashioned apparently. That is now called the "bride price" and the wifes family pays the dowry now.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:29 AM
1

I'm not familiar with York, but more often then not Arts degrees let you just pick up subjects that seem more or less relevant to your major and have a distinct lack of actual focus. It's entirely likely she did focus largely on gender/womens studies for the majority of her degree. Her Masters Thesis was basically on how it's impossible to have a female character in media without oppressing women in some way and only used Joss Whedon stuff as examples (she seems to have a real obsession with him…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:42 AM
1

It is interesting to look at plot devices this way. It's basically her coming up with bad conspiracy theories though. And it's one thing to enjoy thinking up silly scenarios, it's another to go around telling people that they are probably true and they should believe you. The thing is, she isn't going around saying "these are common trends in video gaming that leave me feeling alienated and unwanted for these reasons", she is saying "video game makers and video gamers are sick and oppressing me …
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:13 PM
2

Anita Sarkeesian? Not really... She makes a whole bunch of baseless claimed with no justification other than "cause I said so", some of which show a SERIOUS disconnect with reality (apparently euthanasia = domestic abuse against women?), and some of the things she says are flat out spiteful/insulting like "the male characters don't actually care about the women, they are just ashamed because they weren't manly enough to protect them and need to prove their manliness by taking back their possessi…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:50 AM
3

At least this article had the decency to warn about spoilers. Anita flat out just spoiled a bunch of games with no warning. Funnily enough people were more concerned that I called her a bitch for that in /r/games than the actual point I was making about her content.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:01 AM
1

Eh, Lara came across as neurotic and having major self worth issues to me. One of the hidden journal entries was just several variations "omg Lara is so cool and badass and awesome and I wish she would notice me but I'm just a lame guy, but Lara is so totally amazing and the best person ever". The level of ego stroking was just absurd :S I mean, she is still questioning her ability to defend herself when she has already murdered upwards of 100 people who are all MUCH better armed AND trained tha…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:57 AM
2

Exposure + better sound quality apparently.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:21 AM
2

What's wrong with Patrick Stewart? I always thought he was a pretty cool dude. EDIT: I assume it is in reference to This? He's still an awesome dude in my books. I agree his head might not be in the right place but his heart is. I'm pretty sure if you asked him he would say nobody has the right to hit anybody. Seems more like a poor choice of words to me. EDIT 2: Further review indicates that he was specifically talking about the context of male on female domestic violence, in which case his sta…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 11:10 AM
1

Fair enough then. Poe's law I guess, prevailing opinion is always "never hit a woman for ANY reason" but it's one of those situations where I go substantially against common opinion. Guess it goes to show the satire though that my response to "teach men not to rape/hit" is exactly the same, not dealing with reasonable people, being reasonable with them achieves nothing.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:27 AM
1

How though, you think they don't know that hitting people isn't nice? Why would they stop if nobody does anything back? It's the typical bully mentality, they do it because they know there will be no immediate repercussions. They know it's not nice to physically strike another person, they just don't give a fuck. We aren't dealing with people being reasonable here, and it doesn't matter how reasonable you are if they wont be.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:53 PM
2

Fellow Kiwi here, seems to me that Unlawful Sexual Connection also covers "rape", thus the rape law is redundant and should simply be removed to avoid obfuscating the law. If the two laws exist so as to have different punishments proportional to the offense then clearly the "rape" law needs to be altered to include female rapists in the definition. I'm not a lawyer though, best I have in experience is not getting selected after being called for jury duty (probably would have been challenged anyw…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:37 PM
2

Too many guys out there – especially those who can be a little less socially experienced – don’t quite understand the difference between how they perceive themselves and how they’re coming across to others Socially awkward people are socially awkward!?!?! :O shock and horror! It’s surprisingly easy to give off the creepy vibe to women But that couldn't be an issue with the womans attitude now could it... As I said last time, part of male privilege is all of the things that guys take for granted,…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:09 AM
2

I'm not much of an MRA, but I have had enough "discussions" with feminists to know that I have no sympathy or desire to interact with them in any meaningful way. Hell, I only found out about this place because I was accused of being some "MRA asshole" or something along those lines for claiming Anita Sarkeesians videos are completely valueless and that women would be better served starting up their own female friendly development houses and focusing on highlighting good games that do things well…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:36 AM
3

Wait, people won't be aware of something unless they are made aware of it? I never knew :O
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:14 AM
6

Comic publisher? Wasn't this the developer for Hawken? These were artists at a video game company. As for the whole incident, I find it ironic the CEO is the one depicted in a bad light when he was the far more reasonable of the two. It isn't even particularly irrelevant to a game that basically only depicts ruined cities and giant fuck off robots stomping eachother. It looks like a harmless reference to WWII propaganda posters to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:12 AM
-1

It's Jim Sterling, the man is a clickbaiting troll, he may very well see the full issue but representing it accurately gets him less attention. My main issue is the claim that almost everything is objectification with regards to women. Yes many women in games are shitty characters that aren't designed to appeal to women, but the games aren't designed to appeal to women so why should they be? Also, he claims that cahracters like Nathan Drake are designed to suit male sensibilities, but if anythin…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:29 AM
1

Girl tells you she's on the pill, you bang her and then she tells you she lied bout being on the pill. Chances are you wouldn't have banged her having known she wasn't on the pill like she claimed. The idea is that it's coercion via misinformation I guess, not so much having consent withdrawn retroactively. Calling it rape is a bit much though I think, is "sexual misconduct" a legal thing?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:23 AM
68

Guess I'll be the guy to point out the banner at the bottom. Seems the poster was put up on a joke website?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:58 AM
2

Cool, if you hear about them having any positions open for designers/programmers with no commercial experience let em know theres a random redditor who needs a job right now :p No real experience with Android/iOS but I can learn.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:11 AM
2

Also, I don't think there's a problem with all feminists. Just the anti-sex ones that consider skimpy outfits to be objectifying women. I dunno, just reading articles on a website like jazabel (gawker media, don't get much more mainstream than that) is enough to make one sick. They have articles where they applaud their employees for physically assaulting men for comparatively minor transgressions. Some guy made a joke about rape in private that was in poor taste and you overheard? congratulatio…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:07 AM
1

I'm in New Zealand so it's not the biggest group. Most major game devs are Grinding Gear (Path of Exlie) and Sidhe (Gripshift, shatter few other low end PS2/3/360 games). I talked to a local compant, PixelThis who were pretty cool but not really looking for anyone at the time. he pointed me to the 'community website" for NZ but when I tried signing up it failed to email me the verification link. No reply from admins and the forums looked pretty sparse anyway. Just not that big a scene here sadly…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:44 AM
1

Are you involved in the industry? If so it's cool that there's another game dev out there fighting the good fight :P Not the gaming industry as much as I would like to be. I've done a little bit of amateur game dev but it mostly got stopped by the realization that XNA was a shitty framework for what I wanted to do and support was getting axed for it anyway so I turned it into an excuse to learn some MS linq. I have a Masters in Elec & Comp Sys Engineering though, so I am involved in similar fiel…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:32 PM
6

Funding is pretty widely based on expected profitability. They don't just go off previous sales data but also frequent and comprehensive consumer research. If they don't think games with female leads would sell then it's likely because they stacks of paper telling them so. The only way that could happen and not be true is if women A) lie about their interest, or B) simply don't respond at all when queried. Also, Tf00t is pretty openly hostile to feminists, he's been very vocal against their co-o…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:35 PM
4

He's a bit to fetishized to be directly comparable to Ivy's more general sexual appeal I'd say, but they certainly didn't tone down the "sexuality" side of him thats for sure. Interestingly I have never heard a single male claim that Voldo was offputting or "objectified" or anything like that.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:56 PM
42

As a keen gamer who really only started paying attention to femenisim (and then the MRM after being "accused" of being some "misoginyst MRA fuck" because of this, this sums up the situation pretty well I think. Nobody really had any issues with her making the videos, they just didn't think her asking for money on kickstarter was reasonable (didn't bother me personally) because she, and MANY other people were already doing that shit for free. It then annoyed me when she clearly played the victim …
/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:53 AM
1

If your worried about biased responses make the post but reverse all genders. When the results come in clarify the correct genders. At best you get an honest appraisal to answer your question, at worst you get a biased response because of your incorrectly identified gender, they all backtrack and you are no worse off than you are now (but have a little more ammunition when someone tries to belittle your experiences). Of course it's kind of sad that you would have to worry about this kind of thin…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:30 AM
2

Yea, it seems to be a repeating story throughout middle earth history.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:56 AM
2

Might help to actually read some of Tolkiens work. If anything it goes too far in worshiping women and putting them on pedestals. Several male characters are essentially defined by having to do extraordinary things just to prove they have value to women. Never mind the powerful female elven figures and the fact even the male elves are pretty femenine (hell, Elrond = Pracilla, Queen of the Desert). Okay, that last one was a bit of a joke.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:28 PM
20

And thats why it will be called sexist. It will be claimed that she was only allowed to kill him cause of a technicality, not because she was capable or anything (which is retarded, the comment was supposed to highlight the Witch King's hubris, not demean the character). No pleasing some people.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:19 PM
21

Arwen ... is a huge part of who Aragorn is. Thats an understatement, his entire purpose in life is to prove he is good enough for her. Shes so high up on a pedestal that if she tripped it would be centuries before she reached the ground.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:16 PM
9

His entire character arc was basically proving he was good enough for her. He wasn't even allowed to finally marry her till he got the throne.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter