TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jonipetteri Archive

View 1 post and 55 comments by jonipetteri on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

jonipetteri/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

I guess you are the quota retard who always pops up when this topic comes up. You say "number of degrees" is a meaningless metric, when in fact higher education directly leads to higher income. If you actually bothered to look up which fields are dominated by women, words such as "medicine" and "law" would come up.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:44 PM
-2

"Your friend" might once have said something, but the government has comprehensive statistics, which aren't that difficult to look up, and they prove you wrong. For example see this table: http://i.imgur.com/MY8Oqwe.png source: http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/cps/highlights-of-womens-earnings-in-2013.pdf
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:51 PM
5

You are pretty detached from reality if you think higher alimony leads to fewer divorces xD
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:47 PM
1

The evidence is in the amount of resources allocated to help.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 10:49 AM
-1

Talk about self-delusion.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:23 AM
17

I'm glad they are donating to Feminist Frequency. Sarkeesian can make at least 100 more videos with 300 million.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 03:41 PM
3

I'm not sure why you think that's so true Because you come off as rather braindead so I'm confident everything you say is garbage
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:25 PM
8

women didn't necessarily expect/want to do most of childcare Actually, if the wage gap was real, then it would be monetarily foolish for the household to have the man spend time doing the chores. In reality it's just that women prefer to pair up with higher paid men.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:37 PM
2

Money goes to those who price correctly. The rest won't be left with any money to deal out. Granted market price and some folks' conception of "equality price" sometimes differ a little, say if you demand equal pay per hour but people working fewer hours need more office space allocated to achieve the same output.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:03 PM
9

I don't see why'd you bother write a wall of text when the simple fact is that the wage gap goes against basic economics. We shouldn't entertain a lie just because it has been repeated a billion times.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:32 PM
1

1) run campaigns alleging it is easy to rape and the only thing that can stop you is you choosing not to do it 2) cry about rape culture 3) profit
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:13 AM
13

Link to the study: http://www.socsci.ulst.ac.uk/sociology/profiles/k.harland/Taking%20Boys%20Seriously.pdf
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:33 AM
2

There is no reason to listen to whatever fairy stories feminists believe about history or all the bad brown people. There is only one key insight in feminism and it's that it's all intellectual garbage. It's pretty hilarious if she believes that the chief difference between say the US and India is culture, as opposed to one being the richest big country in the world and the other a severely underdeveloped ex-colony. BTW, feminism did not really take off until the 70's, by which time women alread…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:15 PM
2

Reminds me of this: https://mediacru.sh/574b4386f324 (see the picture on the bottom of the page), and that's just at 25. Mexico has one of the most skewed sex ratios in the world.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:50 AM
1

These are also jobs where gender is entirely irrelevant when it comes to a person's ability to perform the job. False. For example, a Swedish study of 125000 companies found that companies run by women are less profitable than those run by men ( http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://www.foretagarna.se/RegionForeningssidor/Malardalen/Opinion/Nyhetsarkiv/2014/Mars/Lagre-vinst-nar-kvinnor-ar-vd/&act=url ). In the tiny minority of very large companies…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:54 PM
5

If women want "equal representation" on company boards then that is nothing but a childish power fantasy. Company board membership is an elitist concern, and the average citizen will gain nothing from this, but may lose something if the government ever actually enforces these unfair hiring practices. The corrupt don't prosper.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:56 AM
3

The companies, being competently run, will simply ignore the legislation as much as possible. Additionally, with the quota being imposed on only publicly listed companies, many will become private. That's largely how it has went down in Norway (http://sciencenordic.com/gender-quota-boardrooms-come-high-price).
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:41 AM
9

It's a really neat site. You get to make your own index by sliding the sliders around. Here's what I observed by looking at only one variable time Housing and income: Every country comes out exactly equal. Jobs: Every country except Ireland comes out in favor of men. It would be interesting to know what metric they used since I know (by some measure) women's employment surpassed men's in Finland a while ago. Community ("social support network"): Men are ahead in just 12 countries of 36, but ther…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 10:35 AM
4

Even equal retirement age is unfair considering how men die many years younger on average, especially in many European countries where the government endeavors to pay more than a minimal pension. That makes for a huge net wealth transfer from men to women.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:23 AM
2

Scientists agree: %50 of things tilt more to the left than to the right. I'd be surprised if eletheros has a discrepancy above a couple of percent. However, if you count conscription as work then you certainly end up with a bundle of countries where men are paid less per hour.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:34 AM
6

There has long existed a gold standard to determing equal wages: ILO 100. Just about every country except the US is a signatory. It's not just about the job title, but the hours worked and the type of work (overtime/night shift/etc). For example, here in Finland (2013, Eurostat) men work on average 39 hours per week, while women work only 34.8 hours. 39/34.8 ~ 1.12, so naively you would expect men to be paid %12 more in aggregate, or in other words women to be paid %89 of what men are. And Finla…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:20 AM
4

Sure, but there is also a playful angle to it since 'bossy' is on the list too.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:34 AM
1

as men, we have held power for centuries that's why the struggle in legal equality for women took so much time That narrative is rather full of holes. If men had held all the power then how could have the "women's struggle" succeeded at all? Proper history tends to repeat itself - why are women's rights such an unique event?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:17 AM
1

A useful thing is to look at countries other than the UK: a couple of backwaters had granted women and men the right to vote earlier, seemingly without much fanfare or gritting of teeth.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:00 AM
1

I always groan when people talk about The "Original" Feminism, since what follows tends to always be feminist mythology. It's a shame the link on the book on suffragettes seems to be falling off the front page.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:50 PM
2

it becomes difficult to argue when the argument is "You're publicly denying it but secretly love it." Not really. Sexuality is very taboo across the board.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:35 PM
1

I thought this was simply a place for people to promote the male side of what "feminism" aims to do. It's not, or at least I hope we can do better than that. But I do agree this subreddit is very vapid at all times.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:02 PM
2

Well what that's really gauging is whether women will publicly admit they sometimes enjoy being catcalled. The fear of the teacher asking personal follow-up questions if you say yes is real.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:56 PM
1

I highly doubt the one guy was being "socially clueless" about what he was doing. It seemed like a genuine attempt at intimidation.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:51 PM
2

Most of those extra women are retirees. At birth there are actually more men than women.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:59 AM
2

Embarrassment is the norm when it comes to women's studies. Radical feminism is just a symptom, not a driver.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:57 AM
17

I suspect Gawker is turning a neat profit right now from all the publicity they are getting. But they have certainly helped to lend a great deal of legitimacy to gamergate, with Intel, Adobe, BMW, Mercedez pulling ads over Gawker's ramblings.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:56 PM
2

There is actually a pretty high chance the source of this threat will be found if the government decides to flex its antiterrorism muscles. Recently a kid who emailed in a fake bomb threat to dodge exams got caught despite having used tor. I don't know if it would be spam for everyone report this incident with the FBI online form.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:51 PM
1

Because their methodology does not conform with ILO 100.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:44 PM
2

Argumentation is the wrong way to approach something like that. Egg her on, it will be more fun.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:36 PM
1

psycho-path More like there are tons of exceptionally stupid people on the internet. If I was in her shoes, I wouldn't feel bad for them either. It's very much the same thing the mobile/pay to win gaming industry runs on.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:02 AM
1

Exactly: http://agcommtheory.pbworks.com/f/GroupThink.pdf
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:06 AM
1

Actually, I have seen nothing that shows it is not the men who are not considering whatever degrees the women are taking, not that I have tried to look very hard. I find it pretty disappointing how many articles represent the CS gender ratio as some mystery. I guess it is when they are unable to even dig up the basic fact of what the women are doing instead.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:54 AM
1

Report it to the police? You have a witness and all.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:48 PM
0

OP, you seem to assume men should graduate at the same rate. Yet there is little reason to think discrimination does not extend to the lower levels of education, after which you indeed would expect men to perform worse in universities. Nice links but downvoted for your rhetoric.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:14 PM
2

Indeed the term MRA itself has been popularized a lot by all the noise feminists make while they love to deride it, because the One True Equality movement must have femininity in its name.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:23 PM
3

It's not an argument, it's a quip. And it's not using equivocation, but the exact same principle of personal freedom. I'll grant you that it is a lame old joke, which has probably been seen here a thousand times already.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:58 PM
1

In my books that would be an improvement, since at least it would make one joke of an institution less. All these equality agencies are staffed essentially by women only. I think the party line is that it's acceptable because there are no men with women's studies degrees.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:52 PM
4

It would be great if someone did a background check of all the professors of pedagogy etc. I know here in Finland we have one Kristiina Brunila at the University of Helsinki who has not always watched her tongue.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:08 PM
1

So, anyone got a link to the alleged study? Googling "more likely to hit their partners" brings up nothing recent except the site's SEO spam.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:00 PM
1

It is the same with human trafficking statistics. One has to wonder when the government will get competent enough to cook numbers without glaring giveaways. Rather worrisome.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:47 AM
2

This is more far-reaching than the OP says. The exact language of the link is "ihmiskaupan uhri tai parituksen kohde" which means "a victim of human trafficking or a target of pimping" (don't ask me what "target of pimping" means in practice). One should note that this is braindead from the perspective of getting customers to report their suspicions to the police. That politicians feel they can pass fluff laws like these just shows prostitution does not cause many problems in Finland.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:56 AM
2

Old thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/21yhwo/looks_like_an_interesting_study_uc_davis_study/
/r/MensRights04/04/14 08:36 AM
1

I actually read the study and it's a little underwhelming. I'd write this down to the usual, which is poor science reporting.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:25 PM
3

A recent Swedish study found companies lead by women make less profit. Their sample size was 125000 companies. The average profit margin of male CEOs was %8.4 while women made %7. I wish I could find a link to the actual study and not just their blog's tl;dr, as it would be interesting to see if there are differences in growth as well.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:48 PM
2

Some points. The common theme here is pressing her on why the people in charge (who indeed are women & feminist and often got their jobs by having a women's studies degree) are doing nothing. Blatant gender imbalance in the leadership of (most shockingly governmental) equality organizations. The poor condition of the men doing the worst (relative to women) Lack of research into these male issues from a gender perspective. Dearth of qualified experts. Custody disputes The poor educational results…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:17 PM
8

[Men start doing worse in school well before college.](http://hse-econ.fi/pekkarinen/Pekkarinen - 2.pdf) So colleges really don't care. Men are not refusing to go, the colleges are refusing to take them. It is politically unviable to get funding for solving these problems, even when solutions should make a neat profit for the taxman, so it's probably for the best the little money that they do get goes directly where it matters. If men's studies are anything like women's studies, it's all about g…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:55 AM
3

If you google "manhood academy" the very next links after their own site are criticism, so I think the problem is largely solved. You just need to point that out.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:28 PM
2

I'm no student or professional so consider this just rambling, but as I see it you have three things to consider: 1) Comparative law. How custody law is in various jurisdictions. 2) Statistics. What actually happens. I would suggest restricting yourself to OECD for ease of getting stats. 3) Meta. Make observations on how much research is being conducted on the issue and whether it is just quantitative or narrative-building etc. Who are actually polling/consulting the men affected? Sorry for not …
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:46 PM
4

Rationalwiki's MRA article is a pile of crap. I've been trying to stir them into changing it on the talk page (check the "Snark vs Whine" section) but unfortunately I suck and they seem to have lost interest. If you are going to try editing the article, be aware that they will have no qualms about just reverting an edit. Be sure to make a post on the talk page first to justify what you are doing, and then wait a day or two before actually putting the changes in the article. That way you will hav…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter