~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FINESSED.I'm not here to defend Jefferies, I'm saying that any "intellectual" that can get blown out by Jefferies should not be taken seriously | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 04:11 PM |
| 1 | FINESSED.That is irrelevant, he's dissecting Jordan Peterson's rhetorical methods, he doesn't need to be talking with Peterson to do that. Fast forward in that video to here they go through an interview Peterson is doing and Destiny points out the tactics that Peterson is using. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 03:56 PM |
| 0 | FINESSED.Here and here is analysis of that interview if you aren't catching what Peterson is doing. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 03:41 PM |
| 2 | FINESSED.Yes you can, he constantly does this. He'll describe a problem, and then imply a solution and then get upset when someone attributes the solution to him, its a slimy debate tactic.Here he does it again and again. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 03:25 PM |
| -13 | FINESSED.Her problem is that she expects Peterson to own his positions. He'll describe a problem and imply a solution then retreat from the position. It's not a coincidence that he's "misunderstood" more than anyone I've ever seen so an interview. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 02:37 PM |
| -3 | FINESSED.His audience? His historical and scientific revisionism to fit his Christian beliefs is insane and asinine. Here's some select clips, including him getting dunked on by intellectual giants such as... Joe Rogan? And... Jim Jefferies? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 02:35 PM |
| -1 | FINESSED.There are tons of examples here's a really specific one. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/03/21 02:30 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter