~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | If you ever wanted to see proof of "Gendercide" and "Male Disaposability" in one, here you are - Syrian Network For Human Rights sn4hr.orgThese numbers are specifically civilian deaths. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/17 01:31 PM |
| 5 | A bunch of wealthy, powerful women are saying that Hillary is a victim, you guysHence the "if you will". Hillary's actions do not defend the middle class working americans, and are therefore not representative of socialist values. Hillary is the perfect definition of an untouchable bourgeoisie politician, especially when it comes to the email scandal. Hillary believes she is worth more than the average american, considering her stance on monitoring the public through the NSA, but her own emails are completely personal, although we all realize that nobody would care about th… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 10:59 PM |
| 4 | A bunch of wealthy, powerful women are saying that Hillary is a victim, you guysIf that was all you got out of my reply, then you are truly lost. The one thing defining a socialist is a general thought of sympathy, if you will, for the proletariat masses. Hillary lacks this thought, and is therefore, by definition, not a socialist. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 10:47 PM |
| 3 | A bunch of wealthy, powerful women are saying that Hillary is a victim, you guysIf you actually wanted to learn something new, you would have read my reply, and found that your question is answered somewhere in the middle. But you didn't want to learn anything anyways, you just wanted to reinforce your own indoctrinated beliefs. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 10:40 PM |
| 3 | A bunch of wealthy, powerful women are saying that Hillary is a victim, you guysHillary Clinton supports and is supported by large private sector players, and she shows it when it comes to things like NAFTA and the TPP. And don't be ridiculous. Here in Norway your democratic party would be more right wing than the current right-wing administration, which everybody despises. Your beloved republicans are also socialist by definition, when it comes to their extreme love for the military. In this "free world" americucks dream of, there would be no need for military. Isn't it st… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 10:06 PM |
| 5 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConYeah, it's most definitely the wrong approach, but you don't see people protesting the amputations of defective limbs anywhere. Birth defects, like your foreskin (let's call a shovel a shovel, your foreskin was a defect) are of course best handled by removing them. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 02:41 PM |
| 17 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConIf your foreskin was actively obstructing sex, you were probably old enough to consent to the procedure. This isn't about shaming those who are circumcised, it's about giving people the choice when they are old enough, instead of just doing for religious/traditional reasons. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 02:24 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter