TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

joprlady Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by joprlady on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

NAL: While it is legally binding, it’s only a separation agreement & not your final marital settlement agreement/final divorce decree. The question for me is why did your attorney allow you to sign off on something with which you were not in agreement? I recommend seeking new counsel. Meantime, if your concerns are related to child and/or spousal support and/or visitation, you can file an OSC (Order to Show Cause) for a modification in any or all three of those categories. To do this you have to…
/r/Divorce_Men18/08/20 06:40 PM
1

This is correct. However, a former spouse's entitlement (or award) of a member's mrp is not automatic. I cannot stress this point enough. I'm not an attorney. I became aware of the USFSPA via my husband - a USMC, retired 1st Sgt whose fs receives 41% of his mrp. I've read the entire text of the USFSPA backwards and forwards, twice. I advocate for educating members about the USFSPA, as well as either reform, or repeal without replacement of the USFSPA. As such, I offer members the following infor…
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 02:43 AM
1

The 10 year rule only establishes whether the former spouse will receive an awarded payment directly from DFAS. Less than 10 years, the member must pay the former spouse directly. FYI
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:49 AM
1

Not necessarily. These days, pre-nups are actually rather difficult to enforce. The law surrounding pre-nups is very loose for interpretation. As such, it's relatively easy for the opposing party to contest the pre-nup. Nonetheless, I still think a pre-nup works to establish one's intent and having something in writing will always weigh in a court of law.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:48 AM
1

A member with a disability rating of less than 50% an waive their retirement pay in exchange for disability pay. Former spouses are not entitled to any portion of a member's disability pay. However, the disability pay can be considered as income for the purpose of determining spousal and child support. Members with a disability rating from 50-100% are eligible for concurrent receipt. Meaning, their mrp is not reduced by disability pay. However, there are various rules surrounding payments based …
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:44 AM
1

So your member spouse gave you sole custody of his/her children, with zero visitation rights in exchange for their mrp remaining their sole/seperate property? IOW, you somehow got your member spouse relinquished their parental rights in lieu of you receiving any portion of their mrp? I have a hard time believing a member would forgo their children in exchange for keeping their mrp.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:36 AM
1

In fact, per the UCMJ, retired member's cannot live and/or work in another country for more than six months without risk of having their retirement payments terminated. Meanwhile, former spouses can live and work anywhere in the world with no risk to their mrp entitlement. In fact, a former spouse can be convicted of murdering her own children and still be entitled to, and receive, up to 50% of a member's mrp. We can thank Congress for allowing this bullshit to happen.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:31 AM
1

WOW! That's the first time I've heard about dependas taking air and hotel points. Unfuckingbelievable!
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:21 AM
1

The 10 year rule only determines whether the former dependa receives her awarded amount of mrp directly from DFAS. Less than 10 years, the member must pay the former spouse directly. FYI...
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:19 AM
1

It's incorrect to say 10 years is the magic number. The 10-year rule only determines whether the former spouse will receive her mrp award directly from DFAS. Less than 10 years, the member must pay the former spouse directly. FYI
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 01:18 AM
2

“This is no longer a relationship just because we have children. Nope. This is a business we have to run.” Couldn’t agree more. I’ve learned that divorce is the same. Two parties who went into business together are dissolving the business & need to divide assets & debt accordingly. That’s it. Much easier said than done but, if you can look at divorce through a business lens, I believe it will make the process a lot easier.
/r/Divorce_Men17/03/20 04:27 PM
2

AMEN!
/r/Divorce_Men17/03/20 04:24 PM
3

You can likely handle this on your own but, I recommend getting a free phone consultation from a family law attorney who is versed in military divorce. Is there any type of base legal or JAG office where you're stationed in South Korea? If so, start there. As for where you file, I believe you have a few options including, Georgia (where your stbx is located), the state where you claim legal residence and/or your last US duty station. To keep it simple, it's probably best to go through Georgia. T…
/r/Divorce_Men15/03/20 09:39 PM
1

Agreed! In 1981, Congress enacted the USFSPA (Uniformed Services Former Spouse Protection Act). This gave states the power to treat military retirement pay (MRP) as a marital asset in divorce proceedings. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, former spouses are entitled to their awarded retirement pay for life and regardless of remarriage. Payments end when either the member or the former spouse dies. Whichever occurs first. Also, a former spouse’s payment is protected from legal offset or gar…
/r/askTRP29/02/20 03:25 AM
1

FYI... There is no length of marriage requirement for a former spouse to be awarded up to 50% of a member’s retirement pay. The 10 year rule allows qualifying former spouses to receive their payment directly from DFAS. Leas than 10 years of marriage, the member (vs DFAS) is required to pay the former spouse directly.
/r/askTRP28/02/20 12:33 PM
2

Yes, you have to give him BAH for now, but once you’re divorced that ends. With such a short marriage, your husband is in for a rude awakening. As someone mentioned, unless domestic violence/abuse or kids are in the mix, the courts don’t care about who did what. Divorce is nothing more than a business transaction. Think of it as you two owning a business together & now you’re dissolving the business. Assets will be divided accordingly. Divorce is also a civilian matter vs a military matter. Whil…
/r/Divorce_Men23/02/20 09:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter