| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 267 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies. | jormugandr | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 12:41 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Male actor attacks female actor and then the other way around. The difference in peoples reactions is astounding.Not legally. Doesn't matter the gender, the law says if you fight back you share fault. The "first punch" defense is a fiction. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/14 06:19 PM |
| 3 | One way creep shaming hurts men AND womenYou heard it here folks. All posts have to be about pressing issues. If it's not of world-shaking importance, it's not welcome. Glad you're a mod, robesta. Oh wait... | /r/MensRights | 27/05/14 06:01 PM |
| 3 | Laura Ingraham: VAWA is the "Violence Against Logic Act"Quick tip: Articles written by Fox News pundits don't help the cause. If it has anything to do with Fox News many people will auto-ignore it or assume it's a lie. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/12 11:08 AM |
| 5 | Are All Men Pedophiles?Thank you. Here's how I see it. A heterosexual is someone who is sexually attracted to the opposite sex. A pedophile is someone who is attracted to children. A rapist is someone who forces sexual activity on someone else, no matter what their sexual orientation. Rapists are who we should despise, child rapists above all others. Not all pedophiles are rapists, just as not all heterosexuals are rapists. This subreddit hates when people profile all men based on the actions of a small minority who r… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 03:55 PM |
| 7 | Are All Men Pedophiles?And not that long ago, people said the same thing about homosexuals. If a pedophile doesn't have sex with kids, he/she isn't a bad person. He/she is someone to be pitied. They have a lust that they cannot act on without being a monster. Homosexuals are lucky in comparison. They have a legal means to fulfill their desires. Pedophiles have no such thing. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 12:40 PM |
| -10 | Feminist Syrian First Lady: “I am the real dictator” - "One of the things feminists often claim is that if women ran the world, there would be no more war, conflict, hunger, etc. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of history knows this to be ridiculous"Stalin was an atheist, so atheists are bad. Hitler was a christian so christians are bad. Dahmer was a homosexual, so homosexuals are bad. Kony is black, so blacks are bad. They're all men, so men are bad. All of these examples show how terrible these groups are, as a whole. Now we know that women are bad too. Good work. This kind of stuff doesn't help. It just makes MRA's look like woman-haters. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 12:14 PM |
| 1 | seriously though, sexual assault is hilarious. (when the victim is a boy.)Statutory rape is still rape. It doesn't matter if he wanted it. He is not old enough to give legal consent. So this is non-consensual intercourse. Non-consensual intercourse is rape. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 07:28 AM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.I dunno, but I definitely advocate doubling up on BC. 99% means for every hundred times you have sex, you're statistically likely to have at least a close call. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/12 04:07 AM |
| 1 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.They haven't even started human testing yet. It's probably 5-10 years away unless there's a big push to get it to the market faster. This is assuming that serious side effects aren't found that make it worthless. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/12 12:24 AM |
| 1 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.I dunno. Never had a vasectomy... Not sure I could go through with it. I have a fear of needles and surgery. Makes me cringe just thinking of it. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 07:41 PM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.I can understand that, but at least we would have the option. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 07:39 PM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.I think his reasoning is that if an effective oral contraception comes on the market, pharma companies would see more profit from that than a single-procedure option and would block the injection from FDA approval (they have far too much pull with the FDA). IUDs didn't show up in modern form until '76, 16 years after the pill. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 07:38 PM |
| 1 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.They don't even put you under for a vasectomy. Just a local anesthetic. I doubt many doctors would offer full anesthesia for an injection. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 07:29 PM |
| 1 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.They talk about how a different research firm had no trouble finding participants for a hormone treatment in other countries as an example that men are anxious for a birth control method. It confused me at first too. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 07:19 PM |
| 3 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.Non-hormonal. It's a chemical compound designed to fight testicular cancer. So, best case scenario, there might be a good side effect of preventing TC. (No evidence, but one could hope, right?) | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 06:57 PM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.This isn't a hormone treatment. It's a chemical compound that stops sperm development in the nuts. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 06:55 PM |
| 9 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.I would rather not get an injection in the nutsack. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 06:10 PM |
| 60 | Male birth control pill FINALLY makes progress at University of Kansas. In a few years men might have an effective, non-surgical, non-hormonal, non-permanent means to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies.Condoms fail. Female Birth Control is not 100% effective. Doubling up with both parties taking BC would dramatically reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies. Also, it lessens the worry that a partner might lie about or sabotage birth control thought to be in place in order to trap or blackmail. It would be a big step forward for men and women both. Let's hope it works out soon. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 12:54 PM |
| 2 | Can we stop referring to Right Wing Feminists as "Feminists" and instead call them "Female Supremacists"Best to avoid a term coined by Rush Limbaugh, don't you think? Feminazi is a term meant to dismiss all feminists through ad homenim. Radical Feminists don't represent the entire movement in the same way misogynists don't represent reasonable MRA's. Female Supremacist is a good word for Radical Feminists. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 11:22 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter