TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jpflathead Archive

View 115 posts and 1,594 comments by jpflathead on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
705

jpflathead/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:06 AM
504

Men's Rights Newsjpflathead/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:21 PM
466

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:10 PM
452

jpflathead/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:11 PM
258

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/02/14 10:42 PM
256

jpflathead/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:32 PM
236

jpflathead/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:48 PM
227

jpflathead/r/MensRights18/11/13 10:38 PM
139

jpflathead/r/MensRights18/11/13 06:57 AM
135

MR Blogs/Vlogsjpflathead/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:13 AM
132

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:44 PM
125

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:18 PM
123

jpflathead/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:47 PM
116

Blogs/Videojpflathead/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:21 AM
113

jpflathead/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:02 PM
109

jpflathead/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:33 PM
108

jpflathead/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 05:17 AM
97

jpflathead/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:25 AM
85

jpflathead/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:26 AM
78

jpflathead/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:36 AM
76

jpflathead/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:51 PM
75

jpflathead/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:29 PM
75

jpflathead/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:50 PM
74

jpflathead/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:47 AM
73

jpflathead/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:02 PM
69

jpflathead/r/MensRights08/12/13 01:05 AM
61

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:41 PM
58

jpflathead/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:24 AM
55

jpflathead/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:27 PM
55

jpflathead/r/MensRights26/03/14 06:27 AM
51

jpflathead/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:18 PM
50

jpflathead/r/MensRights05/02/14 07:24 PM
47

jpflathead/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:05 PM
47

jpflathead/r/MensRights23/02/14 05:40 AM
45

jpflathead/r/MensRights07/12/13 04:25 AM
44

Feminismjpflathead/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:17 AM
44

jpflathead/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:55 PM
43

jpflathead/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:25 PM
38

jpflathead/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:46 PM
36

jpflathead/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:44 PM
36

MR Blogs/Vlogsjpflathead/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:05 PM
34

jpflathead/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:31 AM
34

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:07 PM
34

jpflathead/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:06 PM
33

jpflathead/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:01 PM
32

Men's Rights Newsjpflathead/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:28 PM
31

Newsjpflathead/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:10 PM
26

jpflathead/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:47 AM
26

jpflathead/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:08 PM
25

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:03 AM
25

jpflathead/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:26 AM
25

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/03/14 06:19 PM
24

jpflathead/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:35 AM
24

Blogs/Videojpflathead/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:17 PM
23

jpflathead/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:34 PM
23

jpflathead/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:13 PM
23

jpflathead/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:20 AM
22

jpflathead/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:41 PM
22

jpflathead/r/MensRights15/02/14 07:02 PM
22

jpflathead/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:16 AM
22

jpflathead/r/MensRights20/05/14 11:35 PM
21

jpflathead/r/MensRights29/03/14 05:40 PM
20

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:02 PM
18

jpflathead/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:47 PM
18

Blogs/Videojpflathead/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:55 AM
16

jpflathead/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:54 PM
16

jpflathead/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:54 AM
15

re: Feminismjpflathead/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:08 PM
14

jpflathead/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:43 PM
14

jpflathead/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:36 PM
14

jpflathead/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:15 AM
14

jpflathead/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:14 AM
14

jpflathead/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:48 PM
12

jpflathead/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:03 PM
12

jpflathead/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:41 AM
12

Outragejpflathead/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:21 PM
12

jpflathead/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:15 PM
11

jpflathead/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:01 AM
11

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:01 PM
11

Discussionjpflathead/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:34 AM
10

Men's Rights Newsjpflathead/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:12 PM
9

jpflathead/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:57 AM
9

jpflathead/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:42 AM
9

jpflathead/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:36 PM
9

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:02 PM
8

jpflathead/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:10 PM
8

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:27 PM
7

jpflathead/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:14 AM
7

Generaljpflathead/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:26 AM
6

jpflathead/r/MensRights18/02/14 11:26 PM
5

jpflathead/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:46 PM
5

jpflathead/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:09 AM
5

jpflathead/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:49 AM
5

jpflathead/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:50 AM
5

jpflathead/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:05 AM
4

jpflathead/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:33 PM
4

Discriminationjpflathead/r/MensRights06/08/16 05:32 AM
4

jpflathead/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:29 PM
4

jpflathead/r/MensRights16/01/14 10:47 PM
3

Analysisjpflathead/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:52 PM
3

jpflathead/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 04:55 AM
3

jpflathead/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:03 AM
2

Blogs/Videojpflathead/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:56 AM
2

jpflathead/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:47 AM
2

jpflathead/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:42 PM
2

jpflathead/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:53 PM
1

jpflathead/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:00 PM
1

Questionjpflathead/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:12 AM
0

jpflathead/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:21 PM
0

Discussionjpflathead/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:27 PM
0

jpflathead/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:38 AM
0

jpflathead/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:52 AM
0

Discussionjpflathead/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:17 PM
0

jpflathead/r/MensRights31/12/13 09:59 PM
0

Blogs/Videojpflathead/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:58 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,594 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I was pretty sure this was going to end up with the undertaker meme
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/19 09:55 PM
3

This is a great example of a girl not realizing just how much weaker than guys they are until it’s too late. You could be banned from twitter, even expelled from college for such a remark! You are denying gender studies science!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 07:13 PM
-21

Even if she is a trans furry, I am very glad she got her job back. And much as I admire and envy everything about Homer Hickam, he probably should've sent either a more explicit message, or a message in a backchannel. We all need to learn to stop shitting on people due to their social media fuckups.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/18 11:44 PM
2

She stayed on her feet, in heels. I am going to have to award her the win. Also, massive props to the cinematographer, for staying in focus and proper editing of the clip.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/18 11:45 PM
3

Have fun at r/incel!
/r/PussyPass12/02/18 03:08 PM
1

Anyone who labels a 16 year old whose sole crime is lying as despicable is a sociopath.
/r/PussyPass12/02/18 02:33 AM
-7

Nah, just no time to waste on morons.
/r/PussyPass12/02/18 02:11 AM
3

u b u you're doing great
/r/PussyPass12/02/18 01:59 AM
4

Like Jobs stole Wozniak's tech? So if we agree she didn't steal the code (and that seems to be the case (she either paid for it, or it was deemed okay for her to take credit for it)), how is what she did, different from any day ending in y in Silicon Valley by Silicon Valley "founders"? I care about who wrote the code if she stole it (I code). I am more curious about other aspects of the project: was it her idea? did she organize the team? did she find devs and designers? did she design it? If h…
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 10:47 PM
1

Regardless of that, she went after the people who uncovered and tried to tell others the truth, that she didn't code it, with threats of legal actions and online cyberbullying. She is a truly despicable human. She's a 16 year old kid. She's truly NOT a despicable human being. It's still unclear from the various articles, and especially the one linked here, just what she did or didn't do or what others did. Can you link me to anyone saying she stole their code that they wrote? She stole their ide…
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 09:03 PM
-42

lulz, you be you
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 01:01 PM
-48

It seems as if she did "create" the app in the Silicon Valley, technical founder understanding of create. She may not have written all of the code, but at the age of 15 & 16 she seems to have conceived of the app organized a team designed it did the ux for it managed the team wrote marketing for it marketed it got the team to deliver And people over in crypto seem quite impressed with all of it, how it runs, how it looks, everything it can do. Kudos to her, if her tale is accurate, I hope it sel…
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 12:20 PM
2

You come at the King, you best not miss She didn't do her research and/or was very arrogant. One look at the cafe's youtube channel should have told her she was playing with fire and that she is the very demographic this guy bites.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/18 04:09 AM
8

Thanks for the reply What GWW wrote is absolutely plausible. Most sophisticated organizations are comprised of webs of corporations. The intention isn't to make things confusing to potential litigants, it's to ensure that problems with one venture don't spill into others. So you've moved from "those people are bad, their lawyer is bad, it's first year lawyer stuff" to "what she wrote is entirely plausible, it's only typically easy". Now you're at "I dislike them, I wouldn't help them at all, I w…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:53 AM
3

/u/tiqr since you are the Alberta attorney, I'd love to hear your analysis of the above. What GWW wrote above has been my understanding since last year when they discussed the suit. My analysis as layman is this is the sort of shenanigans that businesses and their law firms play intentionally to hide income, hide bad practices and evade from customers, IRS (Canadian Revenue?), the law, or exploit legal or financial loopholes, and it's designed to make it hard for everyone: customers, cops, court…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 12:09 AM
5

Thank you so much for providing this. On twitter under a different nym, I had asked, out of curiosity and support. I wish you folks you all the best. (First HoneyBadgerBrigade, then onto Damore!)
/r/MensRights19/01/18 11:56 PM
7

You are the attorney, not I, but I put it down to idiot lawyer games (no offense) ie, the bullshit that lawyers do to evade the court and basically to increase fees and make it difficult. My very limited experience in the legal system has had me see opposing lawyers play asshole tricks like this as often as they can and then letting a judge sort it out, delaying cases far beyond what justice would demand and making everything very expensive. So no, I don't see this as first year lawyer stuff, I'…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 12:04 AM
7

Sounds like a pain in the ass and a terrible amount of work and stress when that $50K is split n-ways along with the chance of losing, along with win or lose many people in the press will make it known, right or wrong, that you were kicked out for being and MRA and worse. Gotta be better ways to make $50K. Amended to add: after being bogusly kicked out of the convention, support for HBB was so high, they could have just crowd sourced a $20,000 campaign for new works, podcasts, whatever and recei…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 11:59 PM
1

came here to post the video, but no need now!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/18 12:44 AM
1

Sounds like a grand time, and hope you can repeat this year!!
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 05:09 AM
2

Thanks, I knew I did something wrong when I saw the link come up, but didn't put two and two together.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 04:59 AM
6

Who won SJW, Whiteknight or Femtard that got the most wrecked by /r/pussypassdenied in 2016. Hillary Clinton, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 04:58 AM
0

Peter Thiel vs. Gawker. And today former gawker reporters are still whining how Thiel is a rich fucking bully, never owning their responsibility. https://twitter.com/lindseyadler/status/933450311535964160 Peter Thiel possibly spending his own money to buy Gawker dot com just to wipe the archives is an incredible exhibit in the case against unrestrained wealth.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/17 12:38 AM
2

You don't know who to fuck? My brother's ass!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 12:39 AM
1

Don't understand the downvotes on your post, I think you nailed it.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/17 08:21 PM
3

the response both seem pretty cringy to me. I see the response as funny and insightful because the cringey part is her or the meme maker saying anything positive about dictatorships. So the response points out that at the least countries do horribly economically under dictatorship and then extends that metaphor to what might be expected from a body positivity message. IE, if you think that in general people can be healthy at any weight, then don't be surprised when you pack on the pounds and you…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/17 08:19 PM
6

I can possibly see that that's just an honest sense of humor gone awry, however, as others have linked, the entire story is bullshit and stolen from a movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 09:41 PM
41

Sounds like the boyfriend is a cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 07:56 PM
2

jebus, now I have to download that one as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 07:56 PM
8

Jesus OP, you are a huge cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 08:31 PM
6

That was in no way equal = equal.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 06:40 AM
-21

I'd ask the same of you, but since you apparently require a "/s" it's obvious you are brain damaged.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 12:14 AM
-50

Only because of social construction of gender differences. If men hadn't starved systematically starved women, or if we didn't give little girls doll houses and little boys footballs, or if it wasn't for all the preferential rape (aka marriage) of smaller women, if it was understood there no difference at all between men and women, besides I'm not going to presume genders unlike John McEnroe!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/17 11:49 PM
1

Thanks, that wasn't so hard now was it? The evidence is in the videos man, but you're not going to see it, ever, unless she happens to grow a dick or you conclude she has morphed into alt-right.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 06:25 AM
1

It's not a false dilemma. You cannot bring yourself to condemn all the violence. You are only here to complain that one girl should not have been hit. PussyPass is you.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 05:46 AM
1

The left aren't the ones sharing and caring about this video. That's ludicrous.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 05:07 AM
1

It's so simple. Condemn all the violence or admit you are giving her a pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 05:05 AM
1

She didn't get sucker punched. There was nothing unexpected about that punch. She was in a melee. You can declare a pussypass for yourself. "I am girl, don't hit me". Or you can give a pussypass to someone else, as you are clearly doing, "she was sucker punched, bad man, no donut" All around the net, people are giving her a pussypass. "Bad nazi shouldn't have hit a girl". Girl, you never answered, but it's clear what your answer would be. You don't give a shit about any other violence that occur…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 04:49 AM
1

and most people don't read comments on posts anyway statistically. god knows you clearly didn't read my comment where I first stated what you came here to insist on.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 04:19 AM
1

On top of that, there doesn't seem to be an ounce of regret in her for being there. What's the pussypass in this scenario? When did she try and use her woman card to get out of something? Next time try reading. I'd say the pussypass here isn't one she is claiming, but one being given to her by all the folks saying it is wrong for men to hit her, when as you state, everyone is in a fight, and presumably came and knew what they were getting into. Are you upset with all the fighting, including any …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 03:50 AM
1

After facebooking her desire to collect nazi scalps being recorded rationalizing tossing an m-80 at an elderly and innocent woman She places herself in the middle of a melee where she is recorded turning into a fight rather than turning away from the fight and running out of the fight. She raises her hands, in defense or offense, and does it matter, how? With all the evidence she gave us, she testified to, she was instigating trouble, looking for trouble, and found trouble. She is absolutely una…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 03:39 AM
3

Hit someone? That's moving the goalpost. I said eager participant, and she was. At between 0:29 and 0:31 you see her turned away from the fray, and instead of moving away from the fray, she turns and moves INTO the fray. That combined with her facebook quote about collecting scalps and her earlier quote rationalizing violence make me wonder why you want to deny this woman her agency as an adult.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:57 AM
6

Earlier she was asked to condemn the tossing of an m-80 that hurt an elderly woman, and she wouldn't. She was recorded saying " the revolution won't be fucking easy". So, in return, I'd say if she lives by the sword, she can be hit in the face by someone wielding the same sword. That is, the video I see indicate she was an eager participant, and it wasn't a sucker punch, and even if it had been, well baby, the revolution won't be fucking easy. Maybe in the future she can examine non-violent mean…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:28 AM
5

How is she using her gender to get special treatment? You're right that she is doing her best for equality. I'd say the pussypass here isn't one she is claiming, but one being given to her by all the folks saying it is wrong for men to hit her, when as you state, everyone is in a fight, and presumably came and knew what they were getting into.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:08 AM
1

Fanta was created during WWII, a huge mob fight!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:04 AM
0

The pussypass is anyone that says that person should not have been punched because she is female. If you want to take the position that anyone in that scrum should not have been punched that's fine. A position that says that person should not have been punched because she owns a pussy, is guess what? A pussy pass. As examples, Raw Story and other places are featuring her and not posting her advocacy of violence and playing that the protesters hit a woman. They are giving her a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:01 AM
3

Thank you for making that statement. They have gone full batshit crazy and it will all be counterproductive. They are so looney tunes, I half suspect this is a somethingawful goon squad takeover.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/17 11:35 PM
5

I'm still staggered that the Oroville Dam had been known to be at risk and in need or repair 12 years ago and Nothing Was Done by the likes of Arnie. Not just Arnie, the Feds have been woeful about this in general, but as the linked essay shows, sadly we are all given a perfect opportunity in 2008 to address these matters but they were derailed by Feminists (and also by Lawrence Summers who didn't believe in infrastructure projects.) So instead of fixed infrastructure, we got largely one time pa…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 11:39 PM
12

She's an idiot. She did everything wrong. Unless Houston that day had a shortage of cops for some reason, I think the cop there did move to escalate when he could have chosen to deescalate by waiting for backup. Regardless of her pussy pass, I would love to hear from some cops and attorneys why he shouldn't have waited for backup.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/16 06:27 PM
4

This is really a terrific article. I am a bit saddened it's at a 3rd tier blog, I think it should see much larger distribution and/or be peer-reviewed and used in class.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 10:14 PM
3

Her sentence should be 8 years and a requirement she take the exams every single fucking day and have her scores posted with a day off her sentence whenever she scored above a 95 and a day added whenever she scored below a 60.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 07:24 PM
1

I think it's certainly reasonable to ask during depositions about their content management system, whether it keeps prior versions, or diffs, and to ask for all published versions of the article. And it seems themarysue uses wordpress, so get a wordpress expert to go over their servers and their testimony.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:45 AM
3

That was a nice email!
/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:11 PM
8

Exactly! It should be legal. It is beneath anyone with a self respect. Pretty much the same as: drinking alcohol smoking weed overeating envy sloth greed driving fast buying lotto tickets vaping white after labor day mixing polyester and linen leaving the house without your hat
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:40 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:27 AM
2

I saw it and wanted to tweet it and mention it at various forums, but I'd like to know where and how you got the memorandum. I tried googling for by searching for text in it, but couldn't find anything other than COTWA. Can you provide some links? I was going to tweet you about this, but @piercecotwa doesn't seem to be a very big twitter user.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:21 AM
-1

You and Paul need to stage a press event where you and he talk about how eager you are to see the movie, how you're fans of the old ones and it's exciting to see the new one, and how much you're fans of Charlize Theron, though Tom Hardy not so much, And then, say something like, it will be a shame when Hollywood Executives announce it's Theron's last fuckable day, cause you'd fuck her anytime anywhere https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7KAA-FSZho
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:17 PM
1

I think she considers solicitation to be a job offer.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:51 PM
4

You look like an idiot feminist when you pick one nit out of that article and choose to be offended by it. Don't be an ass.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:20 PM
1

Oh, just one of life's moves. If this were twitter it would be #NeverBuyingAnythingAgain So reddit is letting me catch my breath :) and waste my time :(
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:25 PM
2

I am guessing that a lot of the professors who didn't sign aren't familiar with the issues or don't feel personally invested in it. Probably true, but speaks poorly of them since it involves their students and their institution if not all of the US. Anyway, back to packing things up....
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:34 PM
1

In that sense, I would prefer he come out supporting the one in five nonsense than sitting on the fence. It would be good for historians to know where the lines are and who was on which side of them.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:13 PM
3

Yeah, that would not surprise me, but it would scare me, in as much as I look up to Tribe.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:11 PM
9

I find it very intriguing, and terribly disappointing that Laurence Tribe is not a signature on the letter.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:47 PM
7

Heh, the people harassing me have been feminists! Edited to add And all you reddit downvoters. Oppressors!
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:33 PM
3

This is a horseshit link based on fruit fly research. Unless you are dating Seth Brundle's ex or Andre Delambre's ex, this is not a worry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzTGSKNjrp4
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:20 AM
2

And google in re john z 2003 30 second rape to find out why "ongoing" really and truly must be continual consent and for safety's sake recorded.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:20 PM
12

they aren't being singled out since its a nationwide crisis, so they don't care. At my local big Uni, ASU, their Clery Reports iirc report about 3%. Regardless, Michael Crow recently made a big speech with big talks of funding to create big policies to stop sexual assault where he didn't mention the Clery Reports, or ASU's actual findings, but did relate the 1:5 figure to stress how important the funding and new programs were. My feeling is that Michael Crow, ASU President for 10 years, is one o…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:59 PM
12

Pierce, I wonder if one solution is not to subtly (?) undermine the proposal by loving it to death. For instance I think, and I honestly believe this, that the President and #ItsOnUs and the DOJ should require University Presidents to personally sign the Clery Reports as well as personally sign statements each months of logs of sexual assaults and rapes, and then, like Sarbanes Oxley, be held personally responsible for the hostile environments that the University Presidents are apparently allowi…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:32 PM
2

I tweeted with the journalist, Cathy Young, and asked her: did you supply photos and captions? the caption seems at odds with article Her response: No, I don't. Feel free to mention that. It actually directly contradicts the article.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:50 PM
2

I've read several articles about this, and they are all vague as to what is happening. Near as I can tell: This is an app and only an app, the company SheTaxis will have only 8 employees or so. The drivers will all work, or already work for actual taxi companies. Female drivers at these cap companies are being sought to register at SheTaxi The app is a reservation app for a taxi. IF YOUR PARTY is only women and there is a woman driver available, it will route your party to that driver IF YOUR PA…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:10 AM
2

Vasalgel will be good to keep us from becoming parents, but sadly, unless our cocks are tattooed with "Vasalgel inside" we're still going to have to wear condoms when dating, ...
/r/MensRights17/09/14 09:17 PM
-2

Fuck you and fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:59 PM
3

http://www.buzzfeed.com/catesevilla/listen-and-believe People shouldn't use donotlink, donotlink is a SJW oriented service that literally does nothing other than place an ad on the content to make money from it.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:57 PM
2

Yeah, that seems sadly realistic too!
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:03 PM
1

I don't know what the MHRM is but if you find it, point it out. If YOU disagree with someone's statement, feel free to object to it.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:21 AM
2

On the harsher side of things, my friend “Mary” tells me that she had a friend who broke up with her boyfriend and then began referring to him as “needle dick.” “We laugh every time,” she says. “She was, like, at one time describing it to me and she said she remembered thinking, ‘Is it in?’” On Facebook, responding to my call for women’s firsthand accounts of how they have talked about penises, a woman wrote, “Stubby. Sorry, Rob, but I was waiting for you to penetrate me and, um, you already had…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:56 AM
1

Interesting article, but I think it could be improved if you had a list of feminist sites linking to the relevant google searches so we could "check your math". That's actually a project I would love to create, a search engine of the top tier feminist websites that understands the difference between articles and comments and knows about things like authors as well as dates so we could search for idiot things marcotte has said about ... that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:44 AM
1

I tweeted out my #whyistayed story yesterday, didn't hear a word about it unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:55 PM
1

Interesting...
/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:54 PM
2

I agree that her ability to carry a gun without limitation should be investigated in light of her clear problem with anger management.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:34 PM
0

So if you spit on me, it's okay for me to: Hit you hard enough to knock you over Hit you hard enough to knock you out Run you over with a compact car Run you over with a fullsize wagon Run you over with a steam roller Nuke your home from orbit to be sure
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:30 PM
1

This guy literally wrote the book on self-defense, and he is telling you what the state of the court is. And he's presenting it on a site that is not very favorable to feminism. I think I will go with his analysis over yours.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:14 PM
1

Ah, that would seem to explain some of the head movements. But why!?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:12 PM
8

You mean the part where he is required by law to pay child support too?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:52 PM
4

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/10/sports/football/ray-rices-wife-defends-him-and-criticizes-the-media.html
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:55 PM
2

Yeah, talk about tone deaf responses by everyone. She's actually in the nytimes today blaming the media on the points you mention.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:27 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/dYfyJwN.jpg
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:50 AM
2

I would be curious in hearing a lawyer describe this lawsuit. I could be very wrong, but it seems timecube crazy and scammy as well.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 02:03 AM
1

English please? Between limiting members of the class, and requiring a paypal payment to join, looks flaky. Is what they are doing standard practice?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 01:30 AM
-9

said Bob
/r/MensRights06/09/14 06:15 PM
2

Yeah, admittedly I was in the annoyed with Oswalt camp prior to then, but he seems to have had a come to jesus moment, so I'm a bit lenient. I still don't find him all that funny, he's hit and miss. I did like Ratatouille.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 06:14 PM
3

at other times he's railed against them
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:53 PM
-12

said the threshing machine victim entering the gay spa.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:52 PM
0

I am upvoting you, because your post rests at -2, and another post of mine rests at -2, and they should both easily be +5 or so.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:58 AM
-2

Why can't you ignore two assholes at once? I think you are being ableist. I have ADHD so it's hard for me to ignore even one loud asshole, NTTAWT.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:57 AM
0

If this story is true, you are an asshole for dismissing her who deserves only condemnation. If this story is not true, you are an asshole for submitting it, and again, you deserve only condemnation. Yes, who she volunteers for and what their reputation is should color your decision. I suspect what you did was illegal, I don't know, it should be. I am hopeful you will one day experience a job search and learn about all the petty reasons people have for ignoring you. Have a bad day.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:35 AM
5

Consider it a choice between Joan Rivers and Louis CK. I'll take Joan.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:02 AM
7

http://i.imgur.com/pVydvFU.jpg
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:01 AM
9

He is able to observe that within 24 hours all these rags published the same "death to gamers" article but never examines how that could be possible in that time frame unless there was some behind the door coordination going on that speaks directly to the corruption laid out in GamerGate.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 11:05 PM
1

No way! Never knew that. TIL. Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:12 PM
1

Troll harder!
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:31 PM
4

You're going to do well around here.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:23 PM
4

Corn flakes are actually, really and truly documented to be both misogyny and misandry. http://mentalfloss.com/article/32042/corn-flakes-were-invented-part-anti-masturbation-crusade Not sure what "soggy" corn flakes do, but probably a sign the anti-masturbation of effects of the corn flakes didn't work. Do not want.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:20 PM
3

Where are the famous Constitutional Law Professors of Harvard? Why aren't Constitutional Law Professors at all of these schools speaking out, either for or against these policies?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:03 PM
5

I agree with you but the problem is structural and due to reddit. When you have 80,000 diverse subscribers of different backgrounds and ages who are not all on the same page to a sub and they can all post links, you can expect outrage to float to the top.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:20 PM
1

Even worse. There is no way a campus kangaroo court is going to listen to this guy's "she didn't ask, she didn't ask", and give him the time of day.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:35 AM
19

Well, I threatened them each with death many times so there's that.. Come on, that's silly. I've gotten threats of doxing at many feminist sites just for commenting in the wrong way. Lots of people male and female, thunderf00t included, acknowledge receiving death threats online. It is very easy to believe that both of them received threats. I think you can question whether each threat they've received is real, or if it's from "friends" or MRAs or other people. And question how serious the threa…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:42 AM
3

Yeah, I put off a phd program in ocean engineering at mit to help put my wife through her phd program. At end of her program, uh, well I had paid off her loans, and about three months later she filed for divorce. Truly, my bad, let me be the first to admit it.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:53 PM
0

Yeah, I know, the guy has on tape his asking for consent on a long list of acts, but then we're supposed to think any jury or judge would think that his asking for consent did not indicate his willingness and consent as well. In fact, there is a classic example from Yale I think supporting that sort of nonsense (something like Kat asked Rye for permission to provide oral sex but Rye did not ask Kat for permission to provide oral sex, so when Rye did that Kat was violated!), but when Yale (or who…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:19 PM
-1

No it's ridiculous. By August's scenario the dude is asking for consent at every step of the way, but somehow conveniently doesn't ask for consent about fucking. And then turns around and says "Ah ha!". So many AVFM articles are just so fucking embarrassingly stupid. And just to be a spelling nazi, though my spelling is shit these days, it's "dam". Sorry. :(
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:41 PM
2

Or TMZ to post nip slips? Or Jezebel to pay $10K for a leak of Lena Dunham's unretouched nudes? Or for proper and right thinking and professional and upright and progressive sites like ThinkProgress (they tweeted in concern about the fappening last night) to continue to link to TMZ and Gawker sites?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:05 PM
2

IIRC, when I read the article, my first thought was when did this occur? It seemed an account from 10, 20 years ago. Then she makes it clear she is still a student! This happened in the past 2 - 3 years. If what she is saying is true, it was terribly negligent, BUT it certainly would seem her witnesses then are still around to be witnesses now, and logs of what happened at the police station should verify her account with them. I definitely think her complaint should be investigated fully and co…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:48 PM
4

The "we would show empathy" is not directed at us in /r/mr but was a quote from the original Emma Watson tweet. I show empathy to these 100 or so folks because it was an invasion of privacy. And you should show them empathy too at least to the extent that the current best guess at the hack shows any iPhone / iCloud user could be at risk and may have been compromised during the hours or days before Apple closed the hole.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:27 PM
1

I apologize, I only skimmed your article. I didn't click all the links, and sometimes the way articles are written, it's hard to tell if there are one or more "main" links that are being discussed. The link I did click was this one, http://www.educationsector.org/publications/truth-about-boys-and-girls I think it's a bit unfair to characterize her today as having the views she expressed in 2006 without at least contacting her and seeing if anything has changed. Especially since the charts you pr…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:47 PM
-1

On that we can certainly agree!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:26 PM
6

Uh, the reality is that 99% or more of the nudes we've seen from this latest hack are women's, and there are many many comments that show a total lack of empathy over this. Come on, I'd like to think /r/mensrights recognizes reality.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:51 PM
8

That's been thunderf00t's point. While feminists and media all rush to comfort Anita #IBelieveSurvivors, the same feminists and media demand that unless Paul Elam and the conference are actually all blown up with bombs with signatures saying "I bathe in male tears" written on the bomb shells with Jessica Valenti's menstrual blood, there is no reason to believe Elam's claim that feminists threatened the conference. Double standards are great fun.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:32 AM
1

I find the soldier thing weird and interpret it as mostly a moffatized pc thing. But supposedly according to the fan theories I read elsewhere at reddit, 9, 10, and 11 were running away from the War Doctor. This doctor supposedly starts to integrate the War Doctor, so I would have thought this doctor far more than 10 would understand soldiers, but in this episode he certainly seems more vehemently against them then 10 or 11. So I thought it out of place specifically for doctor 12, though perhaps…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:41 AM
1

I don't know if it's taken into account. I assume it has been taken into account by the more sophisticated models. And yes, I think it absolutely matters for the reasons you provide.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:19 AM
1

while I am forced again and again to "not cut the children in half". Oh man brother, you and me both. An update of King Solomon and the baby might make for a good Father's Rights meme in the hands of the right artist. But that's precise the barrel so many mothers place the fathers over, and it's aided and abetted by a court system that certainly understands that.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:15 PM
-2

I've never worked in construction. She has worked there for 30 years. The article doesn't cite her as an industry authority, the article cites her as one person. It's like, her opinion dude. But she certainly knows more about it than I do, and more than I suspect most folks complaining about this statement do. What would you do, remove all first person quotes from articles? Have the media fact check each piece of opinion against industry standards?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:08 PM
-6

She's a 50 year old construction worker who has seen a lot of shit. I wouldn't deny her experiences or claim that my experience as a software engineer negates her actual lived experiences. That's how she feels. It is her experience. It is a statement of opinion supported by her verified experience in the construction field.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:31 PM
1

If I tell him that I don't want to deal with him, he will reply back that I am defeated & I am delusional & he'll ramble on about it. In general, when people act like this online, I find (maybe it's cowardly) I can just let their statements be as is. Reasonable people will recognize it as bullshit nonsense reflecting poorly on the guy who says it. People who don't recognize it aren't going to be persuaded anyway. But of course, being the liberal black male he is, he accepts the BS that he is at …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:29 PM
2

"surely do not" (snark)
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:25 PM
2

Transgenderd men in mens only spaces? Take it FWIW, the preferred use of transgender is as an adjective, not as a verb. It's not something that is done to men or women, they simply are. So the preferred headline would be Transgender men in men's only spaces?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:38 PM
-6

I can't find the actual article but it was almost certainly taken from this one. Where did you see it? http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/09/01/few-women-in-construction-recruiting-efforts-rise/14870787/ Anyway, Battle is a 50 year old woman described: From an older generation, Mary Battle also has succeeded with a construction career, although she says it required unwavering tough-mindedness. Now 50, Battle has been working in cement masonry for 30 years and in 2012 became the fi…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:32 PM
2

Are you trying to change his mind? change the mind of people who read the two of you? If the latter, you can just be reasonable, link and describe the facts and the rebuttal arguments and let the people who read the two of you decide. I am sort of a shit in arguments, but I know how to link to people much more persuasive than I. For more tips, you can spend some time seeing how atheists debate creationists. They encounter many of the same tactics. OTOH, wtf? I've never seen facebook as a place t…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:26 PM
2

I forget it's location, if it's in the US, and basically they operate as a retail establishment, their exclusion of women is very likely illegal.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:15 PM
7

Similarly, given how much they judge each other's nudes, like Jezebel eager to pay 10K to get Lena Dunham's unretouched pics from her shoot with Annie Leiboeitz, I am confident that women surely do not make up a sizable percentage of the people looking at the nude pics.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:05 PM
2

Thanks for submitting this here. It's an interesting perspective to find out the similarities and differences of how this works in Australia. Up in the states, I guess I am in your father's shoes. I haven't really seen my daughters in 3 years going on 4 because their mother interfered with my time with them and then poisoned them against me and finally they just wouldn't visit. I miss them terribly. I hope as you grow older you'll be able to reconcile as you might wish to with both of them.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:01 PM
3

Mixed thoughts: I thought the slap was way too hard for just a slap. Same thing with his reaction. To call it a slap was underestimating it, as far as I was concerned. She sort of wailed on him. I liked the episode up until that point, not because of the slap per se, but because up to that point Capaldi was a right asshole, and after that point, the script becamed moffatized. Clara was "right" to slap him though, he was about to let them all die just to prove his stupid point dalek's couldn't be…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:52 AM
-2

IF so, that's a pathetic reason: /r/mensrights will have no effect on CollegeHumor's overall traffic it deprives us all of being able to verify the link and verify OP's claim and examine the context If you want to pull such stunts use archive.today archive.org freezepage And/or provide a damn link to the original. It's the way the web works. Mostly, it's SJW that love starving sites they flag as misogynist of traffic. I think that's a bullshit ploy and not one I will support.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:26 AM
1

Uh, well, um, err, since you only felt you could give us a link to an imgur album and not to college humor itself, you have left me no choice but to decide to ignore your outrage. Because I don't know if it's faked, or what the context is, but I assure you I am an adult and have a tough enough stomach that I can see the original content in context and not end up killing myself or puking my guts out. I've also seen plenty at College Humor that mocks feminism and male feminists so I am going to hi…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:09 AM
1

Try some bleach.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:48 AM
1

You're a dipshit, you're insulting, you're wrong on all your points, and you have no ability to read or empathize. It's Sunday night. So you can fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:14 AM
1

FOAD
/r/MensRights01/09/14 04:52 AM
3

Why does this link go to a mirrored video instead of shoe0nhead's orginal?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 02:45 AM
1

The SPLC's misogyny articles are almost all written by Arthur Goldwag http://arthurgoldwag.wordpress.com/ Who I am certain has credited Futrelle on several occasions. Credits Manboobz https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asplcenter.org+manboobz https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aarthurgoldwag.wordpress.com+manboobz Shameful the SPLC doesn't closely examine what their contributors are writing for them. Typical though. But per our wikipedian up above, when Futrelle blogs it it doesn't count, …
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:41 PM
2

The SPLC's source IS David Futrelle. They state it is David Futrelle. The SPLC launders David Futrelle with zero research of their own, and then it gets cited by Wiki. Do you even lift?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:19 PM
3

Congratulations on college. You might do well to start reading about FIRE and what FIRE has to say about your rights as a student and specifically what they have to say about Vassar https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Athefire.org%20vassar Title IX
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:13 PM
1

The thing is, nobody is going to indefinitely block you unless you vandalize the article or violate the one revert rule. If you're being uncivil, you might be indefinitely blocked but that's if you starting swearing and going batshit insane on other editors Uh, no. And frankly, the one way to deal with wiki nazis is to tell them to fuck themselves. As I've said arguing with wiki nazis and wiki lawyers is a futile process.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 09:54 PM
1

You feel how you do, I am not going to change it. I feel as I do, you will not change that. We should probably move on. ("be bold" has certainly been tossed my way to explain a reversion that came without improvement of discussion by a wiki nazi of a perfectly reasonable edit of mine. If you don't see these things, ask around.)
/r/MensRights31/08/14 09:53 PM
1

No, sorry, this is bullshit. Assume good faith Do not revert until you have first tried to improve Do not engage in wiki lawyering Do not consider yourself the owner of a page Do not be a dick Do not insist the person who you've insulted and slapped in the face with a unexplained revert to come back to you to discuss it. Rather, stop being a cunt.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:34 PM
1

Fuck the wiki which requires 160 hours of learning all the vagaries of its policies and how to appeal and how to just about anything by its mazelike masturbatory policies.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:04 PM
1

If they revert your edit with no explanation, leave a note on their talk page asking why they made the edit. O Wiki told me: assume good faith fix and improve rather than revert Then when a thousand wiki nazis corrupted the place, wiki came up with a rule: be bold To rationalize these fucktards and their fucktarded behaviors. Fuck the wiki's be bold policy. Fuck any fucking fuckfaced fuckheaded wiki editor that reverts anything other than vandalism without first trying to improve it. Fuck any fu…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:03 PM
1

I think when they said that they were threatening a ban, they might've given you the article probation notice? Or it might've been a violation of the one revert rule. That means you can only undo 1 edit on the page in a 24 hour period (but don't revert right outside of the 24 hour period because that's considered "gaming the system"). No, I mean the fucktards that can recite every wiki policy and give each other barnstars love to take at the first sign of a dispute to toss twenty wiki policies a…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:01 PM
1

I have learned from experience it is completely futile, no, no it is worse than futile to edit the wiki wiki nazis and wiki lawyers and all around wiki fuckfaces will revert even terrific cites within moments and eventually it's just a nasty experience and almost always contains some entrenched wikiretards threatening a ban. Fuck the wiki. Hope the servers burn. Wiki was a terrific idea, but Jimbo is a fuckhead leading a band of fuckheads. Fuck Jimbo. I'll abstain.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:55 PM
1

Well as I said it's just my recent complaint. It's not saying that too high a level is actually worse than being wrong. Basically that for many articles, the wiki process leads to idiots and assholes using it as a battlefield to war with themselves over who is smarter. So a page that started with an explanation for laymen literally ends up containing little more than calculus.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:58 PM
8

That they do. And it's certainly not just MRA issues. It's basically everything at Wikipedia. My favorite recent complaint is that even pages devoted to math and physics concepts have been shat on by the wiki process such that few people except Ph.Ds can understand them. And I have degrees in both math & physics, and forget the wiki, it's just an atrocious resource these days.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:23 AM
17

Thanks. I am always interested in seeing the various forms of corruption and idiocy at Wikipedia, and then seeing them rationalized and justified by the douchebag editors and admins there.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:22 AM
3

It's indicative of the hostile environment fathers find themselves in. The implicit assumptions that men behaving normally with children and teens are in fact predators. Society's encouragement of that. "Stranger Danger" which in fact was encouraged by prominent feminists who should have known better and known to speak out against it: http://www.counterpunch.org/1999/10/26/katha-s-silence/ I was RETURNING with my children back into the US, I had a passport, and their birth certificates AS WELL A…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:13 PM
2

What he witnessed: 15 minutes of a man professionally posing and carefully photographing in public well dressed older teenaged girls What he thought: pedophile
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:03 PM
22

The trailer is stupendous. Here in the US, I have personally lived through every segment of it (excluding my ex hitting or killing my children). From the trailer alone, I feel "a bit better" understanding this is a global issue.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:30 PM
4

Heh. Cynically, abstractly, romance is a continuing negotiations precisely over blurred lines, lines intentionally blurred with language, body gestures, and even alcohol so as to allow two people to cross various personal boundaries of their own and their partners to establish whether a sexual relationship is possible and desired while allowing each partner to save face during a retreat. It's a process and negotiation that has been documented for at least 5000 years since the Sumerians started w…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:37 PM
4

Hey /u/Wikipedia-Kyohyi you write Linking to Wikipedia from this sub has caused problems at Wikipedia But if I would were at the wikipedia, I would revert your entry with a big floosh because you have not cited any damn thing. So... [Examples needed.] PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE give us specific citations of precise locations where /r/mensrights have caused problems. PLEASE ADDRESS where reddit's feminists communities have specifically called for brigading, and nominated a perfectly fine article for de…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:18 PM
1

Oh. Where did you see this feminist ask this good question?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:02 PM
18

Huh? the gamer rage has been almost entirely against the gaming journalists and their corruption for sleeping with her - she is their primary weapon against them most people are just calling her names as a secondary almost all critiques say she is apparently a dishonest skank and worse hypocritical when it comes to her own definitions of rape, but they are also saying who she fucked and how many people she fucked is her own business. Again, the chief complaint is about gaming journalism corrupti…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:21 AM
-1

She's writing in a British paper. Makes calling her a cunt perfectly reasonably.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:45 AM
0

Say P(women gets tazed for this) = 0 P(white dude gets tazed for this) = 10 P(black dude gets tazed for this) = 60 I'd say the primary issue was his being black. Being male is necessary but not sufficient. But I will walk back what I said and admit I can see this happening to a black woman and probably at the same or larger rate than happening to a white man.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:06 AM
4

Salon characterizes this as an issue of race, and race alone. I wonder if this man would have been hassled at all if he was a woman? I think his primary problem clearly was being black. But I do agree, I could see this happening to a non-black male, but I can't see it happening to a woman.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:18 PM
-2

For Father's Day she wrote a column saying we shouldn't congratulate stay at home dads because most do it because they are unemployed mothers still have it worse http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/09/stay-at-home-dads-job-parents She is a mean spirited cunt. You and she may think "I bathe in male tears" is a joke, but she actively works to cause male tears and then she publicly bathes in them.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:41 PM
1

You clearly watch it more than I do. I know Ana and Cenk, but that's about it. Of the two, Ana seems more supportive of men, though Cenk is funnier if you can swallow his occasional bullshit argument coming from ignorance.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:47 AM
2

It's true I don't watch except when videos are called out. It's my impression though, that Ana is one of the more men's rights friendly, skeptical "anchors" out there. Not that that's saying much :/
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:47 PM
3

It's not accurate to say they stayed "silent". TV IS a visual medium, and Ana was clearly nodding in agreement with Gina about a false accusation ruining his life. Now Ben is quick to acknowledge his presumption that the cops had evidence. And presumably his presumption that the cops and da etc. didn't have bad motives and didn't have agendas of their own and couldn't be manipulated. All of which is interesting, I am curious how often Ben gives his presumption to the cops having caught the right…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:27 PM
5

Hey kid, I'm pretty mra myself, but I'm not so sure of kickinwayne45's understanding of history. Best continue looking.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:23 PM
2

Very interesting answer that fills out what others said here. Um, I read the part linking failure to register being a felony, with felony disenfranchisement, just a few days ago, in some thread here. That's what convinced me that practically speaking, yes, the right to vote is directly linked to the draft. Don't sign up, lose your right to vote. I'm probably as ignorant if not more so than anyone regarding the history of the draft, so I appreciate your details. And yes, based on the supreme cour…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:37 AM
1

Well to the extent she was referring to Women's Equality Day, that "holiday" is a US holiday.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:58 AM
1

your machine helps the server out with processing things like your character etc, so other player can see what you are doing without the server having to redraw so to speak every move you make. Ah, that would work. I wonder if they do this (I would think lag would keep them from doing that.)
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:55 AM
1

Can someone eli5 for me how online modded games work? how does a modder mod an online game? Does she need access to the server? why would a kid or anyone logging into the game online see the modded game?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 11:56 PM
3

But be wary of all the feminist revisionism that goes into modern history. Indeed. I sort of wonder if there will ever be an era of future historians complaining about the dark ages of the 20th and 21st century when political correctness rewrote all the histories.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:54 PM
3

That's enlightening. Can you recommend any sources for a gentle introduction to that? It's not an argument I used (linking the vote to conscription) and I'm doubtful about it, but there was some link in the minds of those who ran the country it seems. I do think that gww makes it clear upthread, that in the 70s, voting and the draft were explicitly linked in the minds of the country and that is what shaped the selective service regime we are now in.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:42 PM
9

Yeah, that's her in a nutshell. Her previous big controversy was when she started talking about a fundraiser for cancer by first bashing on male atheists thus turning a cancer fundraiser into all about her. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XWjkqh85pw
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:57 PM
1

I've never read it, but it's so often quoted at FARK where I used to hang out 24x7, I sort of almost feel like I have :)
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:43 PM
7

I enjoyed the part where she is beating on you you get annoyed with her so you need to apologize for your behavior But in your humanness, if you do falter in this you need to acknowledge it. Apologies are in order no matter hard you may find them. You need to acknowledge when your behavior isn’t at its best, confirm you know this and are working on it, and try to explore the trigger so both parties can better understand and prevent this next time. - See more at: http://webcache.googleusercontent…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:38 PM
15

They did take it down, with no explanation. It can be found here for the moment: http://t.co/3Vs42YfuKW
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:37 PM
1

Two things: I agree entirely with you, the danger of cheap roofie detection is that roofies are more myth than matter. Doorman/bouncer is like the second most prevalent career at Reddit, FARK, and so many other forums -- I don't understand it.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:35 PM
0

Then I encourage you to make that clear in the descriptions of your links when you submit them. fwiw, iirc, during her various raping of other people, she was possessed. I think the fainting over either of these shows is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:45 AM
1

Yes, it is a penny dreadful set in Victorian England with Jack The Ripper, Vampires, Werewolves, and Demons. There was incest, there was rape, there was bestiality, there were demon possessions, there was lots of sex, and no, there was not a whole lot of "enthusiastic consent" What's your point /u/wyrn, would you like the sanitized social justice show instead? All that said, I was disappointed in the series. With all that sex, the first episode was far and away the best, and I don't think it liv…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:00 AM
4

Also, if black people on tumblr can hate on bad white people, I can do the same in return. I actually like much of what you post here Chris, but yeah, I'm not sure celebrating your right to hatred of others is really the place you should be going.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 10:40 PM
2

Point her to articles written by Cathy Young. Cathy Young's articles are always well researched and exceedingly balanced acknowledging the positives and negatives. Here are some recent ones: http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/07/31/who-hurting-men-rights-movement/HmoV7KuZdAMk9q8HSICglO/story.html http://time.com/3028827/women-against-feminism-gets-it-right/ http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/cathy-young/women-against-feminism-blog-misses-the-mark-cathy-young-1.8909937 Her book Ceasef…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:02 PM
3

Jonathan, I've been very impressed with what you've accomplished. I find your essays well researched, factual, and should certainly be a great resource to students -- I am way past being a student and I find them a great resource.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:45 PM
1

He associated men desiring spontaneity in 'hook-ups' with gender inequality without bothering to look at the same patterns in homosexual relationships. Interesting. He's long known as a feminist through and through who loves to shit on men in the name of feminism. This may be ad hominem but it's late my time so I will give myself a pass. He's head of a stony brook men's studies center. Only men's studies center in existence for several years. It is funded by, and on the board of directors are ab…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:04 AM
2

zing!
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:24 PM
5

I think I've had my prostate checked twice in all my time. You're in medical school, what do you expect to find up there? Anyway, welcome to Reddit.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:44 PM
0

It's not a question of my not liking words, it's a question of you coming into a topic and then insulting the very people the topic is aimed at, and doing it in a way to make all of us look bad. When pointed out, you start off with the "riot at parties", "I think I'm funny", "you're oppressing me", "poor little biddums". It's your right to be a stupid cunt. But you might think twice about it.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:47 PM
0

Oppress my cock dipshit.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:28 PM
0

I also don't particularly care for children. It's not something to cry about, a lot of people don't particularly care about children. And find them irritating. Then why the fuck do you feel compelled to add your two cents to this thread? Fuck off
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:17 PM
0

I've literally seen new-mothers respond with better humour to exaggerated baby-hate. Learn to take a joke, not everybody sees babies as sacrosanct. Think about that some and stop being a jackass.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:16 PM
3

Actually I was thinking he could eat my shit.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:11 PM
1

I suppose so too. :/ Anyway, I just wish everyone here submitting links at reddit would try to describe what the importance or relevance of their link was. (Of course, were they to do that, 99% of reddit links would vanish.)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:11 PM
0

I would love to have contact with what you refer to as my "sexcrement" Unfortunately, a TRUE men's rights issue is parental alienation and enforcement of custody. What I truly don't need is fuckfaced tards like you referring in a men's rights group to children as 'sexcrement' and then being upvoted enabling assholes to see that men's rights groups don't really care about kids. This was a great video. Thank you Dan for shitting on it, and shitting on other fathers. You must be a riot at parties b…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:39 PM
3

I encourage you to be more specific in your description as to why we should watch this: 90 minutes Michael Kimmel Both of those seem like a huge investment and likely zero return for it of my time.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:58 PM
2

Apart from the stop bashing feminists, there are a ton of crap links posted everyday. This subreddit is definitely 100 duck sized horses.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:17 AM
3

Sadly, I think this what you get when you have unmoderated links being submitted by 80,000 people of all backgrounds.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:51 AM
2

And they are just lazy shits who know it's easier to just pass on the easy obvious meme and not do any digging.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:49 AM
2

Your words are wise my friend. Can you tell us more? Which women are safe to pass by on the road? Can I go to a hospital and be helped by a nurse? How do I disarm one of these creatures?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:48 AM
5

I swear so many times now it seems agencies, organizations, people like to inflate numbers because it makes their point so much more significant. So much agenda driven bullshit uncritically reported by the 4th estate.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:40 AM
12

They are beautifully shot photos. I can see him as a father and artist taking them. I honestly have no understanding why he would post them to Instagram. My "2" year old is 18 now, and we knew back then not to take pictures of naked kid in the bath to Walgreens much less post them on the net. That doesn't make okay what happened to him or to his daughter, but jeez, what was that dude thinking?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:36 AM
0

You just painted a horrible picture and an inaccurate picture for us all. Basically you just shat all over this otherwise wonderful post.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:31 AM
1

Not from what I've seen. Feminists hate gay men. They say it's bad and men are only gay because they're misogynists. That may or may not be, and I've seen that too, but the point is, to prove they are sex positive and gay friendly, in any discussion discussing heterosexual or lesbian sex they will promote gay men and gay sex versus the rape of all PIV sex.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:45 AM
2

The crime wouldn't be rape, and having been to a bachelor party or two, I can't remember when I saw the strippers pull out a flacid cock from the bachelor and make fun of his small size. And the author has deleted the post. So no, I suspect it was bullshit all along.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:43 AM
0

Yeah, I caught that weaseling as well regarding the similar living conditions... I trust the CDC for medical issues. Since 2010 and their widely criticized heavily politicized National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, it is difficult to trust them on social issues.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:46 PM
1

Those are both trolls. As you say the question is over sexual assault not rape. And before there is question of consent, there would be their stripping the dude in public. Almost certainly an assault and possibly lewd behavior (http://www.shouselaw.com/engage-lewd-conduct.html) regardless of consent. If they were paid for their stripping and the subsequent sex act, there is probably also a charge of prostitution. It's mostly strawman until the two trolls (probably teh same dude and his alt) can …
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:41 PM
1

It's Paul Elam, he sees a foot, he has to shoot it. Oops, it was his. Again.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:04 PM
5

This story has gone around for awhile, and working from memory, I've never been sure what to make of it. the kid is pretty young himself and sexually inexperienced he certainly has a porn problem and worse a child porn problem but he has never acted on a real world pedophile urge the articles says sexual Studies suggest that up to 9 percent of men have fantasized about having sex with a prepubescent child, so I've never been quite convinced he is this brave young pedophile kid so much as a confu…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:46 PM
1

There is no such thing a sex-positive feminist, there are only female sex-positive feminists. Male sexuality is, and always will be, the devil to them. Theoretically that's a false statement. In reality, that's a true statement that becomes even truer when you restrict it to Heterosexual male sexuality. Amanda Marcotte who claims to be a sex positive feminist once wrote an article excoriating a book that suggested to married women they give their husbands a blow job in the kitchen. http://minx.c…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:34 PM
2

You're such a fucking retard. The issue isn't over enslavement learning skills moron, but the issue is over competing with American businesses and putting them out of work lowering wages for workers who are not in prison Piss off.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:24 PM
4

I think that happened a while ago. Certainly happened at my undergraduate school. Pretty much happened at my graduate school -- that was 15 years ago.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:10 AM
8

That's my take. He's been President of ASU for 12 years, since 2002. If he woke up last week to find 20% of ASU women are being sexually assaulted, then he is incompetent. And he should resign. If he has known for 12 years that 20% of ASU women are sexually assaulted, then he is criminally negligent. And he should resign, and then be prosecuted or sued in civil court. If he doesn't believe anywhere close to 20% of ASU women are sexually assaulted, then he is a toady, intellectually dishonest, an…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:13 AM
5

There is just so much wrong with how we sentence and deal with people, from three strikes, to outsourced commercial prisons, debtor prisons, tent city, prisons competing with private industry for call centers, manufacturing, etc. Even just the everyday fines that cities impose on people for traffic stops, or failure to pay on time, all that shit only serves to create two classes of people.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:02 AM
3

Thanks for submitting this post. There is no reason there should not be more awareness of this. (My rudimentary search shows me there is very little mention of this at either Al Jazeera America or Al Jazeera World News English - Qatari owned media sites) But really if these reports pan out, it is horrifying and should be on every news channel.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:27 AM
1

First, I greatly appreciate your response. An excellent example of what I strive for when um, yeah, I fuck up. It would have been quite easy for you (or for me on other occasions) to deny or to run. So thank you. Two things: One: I still am curious your explanation for 1976 easy jobs for daycare for men in an environment of unfettered Patriarchy 40 years of feminism in the meantime working against the Patriarchy 2014 very difficult jobs in daycare for men How that is evidence of either Patriarch…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:19 PM
1

I gave you the link in my original post you responded to. You didn't read that link, you just gave me your unscholared unsupported opinion. You then informed me we have different definitions of feminism. You finally read the article when I said gave you the link a second time called you and ignoramus and said "fuck off" You then told me how impolite I WAS. Some people would say: not reading the link is impolite rebutting with no support is impolite insinuating my definition of feminism is someho…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:49 PM
5

I certainly have: ex got a TRO against me providing no evidence she needed one that TRO deprived me from seeing kids for three months when we got to court, TRO was over turned, yet I had to assume the hurt to relationship with my kids court psychs in that court actually said I should be given 50/50 time with the kids, said I was a great parent two weeks later, court let her move out of state with kids ... court NEVER enforced the parenting time provisions court allowed endless delays (years) cos…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:40 PM
14

You're absolutely right. And people have been mumbling about this for at least a year, but it never gets teh widespread attention it should. As an interesting exercise, google worker cup deaths visit http://america.aljazeera.com/search.html?q=world+cup+deaths
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:28 PM
2

You sir, are an ignoramus. No really, you are. Please read: http://www.counterpunch.org/1999/10/26/katha-s-silence/ Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:17 PM
3

Nonsense. Don't let feminists confuse you. They will gladly use rape for whatever they feel like while telling you not to. Rape means a shit load more than just actual the actual penetration and even as a metaphor it makes clear the horrible violation that has occurred. FUCK ME, I said something embarrassing in class the other day. I WANT TO KILL MYSELF. I was raped by the family court that threatened me over missed payments but never threatened her over denying me parenting time with the kids I…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:11 PM
1

So in the early 70s, with the Patriarchy intact, my dad could get a job in daycare, but 40 years later, with Feminism, my dad couldn't get a job in daycare because Patriarchy Hurts Men Too?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:57 PM
0

Hey dumbass, this is what your link tells me: Feminists: finding ever more innovative and pervasive ways to remind young men that they're all potential rapists. Now in bathrooms too! - [88:12] Suck on that and tell me how anyone would know the link supposedly goes to the relevant part. And that's already belaboring the point it's Michael Kimmel who we would expect nothing less of that some bullshit feminist crap theory about boys. Nuh, uh, crap link, crap video, not going to waste my time on it.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:54 PM
0

Great. 90 minutes, blah blah blah. How much time should I devote to your video? Even better, it's Michael Kimmel. Now I really want to watch your video. Hint: I am not watching your video unless you tell me why, when, and for how long.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:34 PM
4

Who is doing the outside chores taking out the garbage bringing the garbage in mowing the lawn gardening maintaining the car fixing things does the finances, pays the bills, etc.? How many hours is he working? Which is more stressful and requires more downtime, "housework" and going to school or maintaining a job and clients and ensuring there is continuing income? If you weren't in school, what could you be expected to do? Various studies have shown that when all of work is added, from housewor…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:32 PM
10

Typical feminista. Rationalizing the impossible. Woe be to any person of any sex or gender that would ever date her. She will never be wrong about anything. Sociopathic bitch.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:00 AM
1

It's circumstantial, but look at their own pages: Who uses donotlink and why: http://i.imgur.com/vSDQPe6.jpg Do you think they are looking for use from feminists, or from MRAs? Look at who created it Look at what links they have highlighted. Look at the comments they host about each link Unlike the other archiving services, what DNL primarily does is make it difficult to find the original link. So you can't easily figure out, does the link go where it claims to have gone. Does that benefit SJW o…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:18 AM
1

Boy, that was a lot of words where a simple bird would have sufficed.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 08:10 PM
4

I'm curious what you think of this article by John McWhorter: There Is Only One Real Way to Prevent Future Fergusons: End the War on Drugs http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119121/ferguson-missouri-and-war-drugs-how-two-are-connected The killings of unarmed men by cops I have personally witnessed have all been of homeless white men. I agree that Death by Cop is a men's issue and agree that racial injustice is also an issue. My own naivety perhaps tells me an additional very critical problem (an…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:48 PM
5

Where does it say he got the same sentencing a woman would have gotten? Since he wasn't the baby's father, I think if he is found guilty, he should swing. I would say that about a woman who was not the baby's parent but was caring for it and battered it to death. I'd probably say that about the parents, mother or father, of the baby too. Intentionally murder a baby while babysitting for a few hours? You can dance at the end of a rope. It's 2014, if you "accidentally manslaughter" a baby, you can…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:39 PM
2

No problem. They bug the shit out of me.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:31 PM
1

You may feel like these faiths are too strong of an opponent to tackle. I say that we are up to the challenge and by persistently invoking the moral high ground and the truth, we can make this a reality. I am saying head to head confrontation is unnecessary, distracting, will probably end up killing your movement, and is certainly the slowest route to take. I am saying many of your strategies without the head to head confrontation will win in the medium run, and so, you don't need the head to he…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:01 PM
4

I think Ana is more friendly to men's rights than Cenk.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:50 PM
3

Please do not use do not link. It does not do what you think it does. All it does is place an ad on an iframed original. All that does is fund a SJW organization. Better to use archive.is, freezepage, archive.com. The actual link is: http://www.collegehumor.com/post/6973833/7-things-only-guys-will-get
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:48 PM
1

I actually agree with much of this, and advocate much of this elsewhere as I always have. Sadly, maybe because it's early, I can't tell how facetious you are being. Most people want to jump to: Just make it illegal for everyone Which will never work straight out but will annoy everyone and make MRM progress difficult on many many issues Regarding punishment for doctors and parents: Columnist Anna Quindlen once asked pro-lifers who consider abortion murder "How much jail time" for women who get a…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:33 PM
-2

That's awesome. Tell me how your jihad against Jews and Muslims is going to work. Who shall we start killing first?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:18 PM
-2

Well I asked your dad and he says you've always been this way.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:44 AM
0

No srsly, dude, stop concern trolling.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:29 AM
2

Anyway, hopefully I am signing off. Thank you for an interesting conversation.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:59 AM
-1

Do you actually have anything of substance to say, or are you just an asswipe?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:58 AM
2

Your concern has been noted. I have reported you as a concern troll.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:58 AM
2

would you really take that as welcome is sort of different to the plight of many men and some women, which is that yes, it would be nice to experience from time to time. Imagine the loneliness of always being the pursuer. And even being shamed for being unsuccessful or having none of the attributes or qualities.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:58 AM
1

I think that like a lot of things, the AVFM post needs major editing and thought, and I think for a mission statement there are two many items (I agree all of these in some form are good issues, just too many for a mission statement.) And then I think each item should have been a hyperlink to a page discussing it.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:55 AM
-1

Jews and Muslims aren't our friends. Okay, thanks for your suggestion.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:39 AM
1

I can't easily speak to the sexual harassment you've encountered. I am certain that sucks. Just as I long on the other hand to have had some sexual attention directed towards me. It sucks never having gotten that. Oppression by men, or just the human condition? (I'm not excusing in any way the egregious behavior of your boss.) I've been ignored often times in meetings. Often times when frankly, I knew I was right (and more educated on the issues). I've been overlooked for promotions. My attentio…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:32 AM
2

Shorter me: I don't see MRAs demonizing women for fighting for their rights. I think most MRAs respect and admire women fighting for their rights. What is demonized is enormous overreach where "equality" becomes "substantive equality" (which is basically advocating inequality just favoring women.) inability to recognize enormous advances If something is demonized it is very privileged feminists claiming they are victims and oppressed. Justifying their first world problems by looking to the third…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:01 AM
2

If you can acknowledge that you wouldn't want to be a woman, why get angry at women who want to make the answer to this question "it doesn't matter"? I'm not very clear what you mean in specific by that. OTOH, I do at times interpret the (feminist) fight for gender neutrality to have a not terribly hidden agenda to shame on punish traditional masculinity. Feminism was against gay men, until feminism could piggy back on gay rights. Feminism was against transgender women, until feminism could pigg…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:58 PM
1

Thanks for answering fully and swiftly. I really do appreciate that. So to put it really bluntly, I would rather stand the chance of losing full custody of a child than stand the chance of being beaten daily by my husband. No one in my family or extended family, no one I've ever known has faced (or acknowledged) daily or even frequent or even rare beatings by a husband or wife. Yet several, including me, have certainly lost all custody and contact with our children "just' for being male. I've al…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:39 PM
8

I'll be happy to respond, but it seems you are trying to prove a point by asking a loaded question. To indicate your good faith, can you answer the question first?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:21 PM
-1

Presumably the partner can argue that was a voluntary choice and not one the partner desired and a judge will adjust alimony accordingly. Until you can show that the case you mention represents a significant number of cases, I will advocate alimony reform as I have outlined and leave it to the court process to determine those cases. I think that's better than worrying about a case that doesn't seen to be significant and use that to abolish all alimony.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:18 PM
4

Why, when the whole point of alimony was to support women who were presumed to be unable to support themselves? No longer the case, right? Alimony is to support a partner who has objectively and measurably taken time off from a job or career get back on his or her feet until they can find a new job or reengage in their career. I accept that for any marriage, if one person drops out of the workforce to become a full time parent, that there is damage to their career and it may be difficult to find…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:46 PM
-1

This is my longer critique of the AVFM statement. On reflection, I think it's a good start, but I think it needs some work I am often very critical of AVFM. All in all, I think it is a good start for a mission statement, but it's not great. I support passage of the ERA, and ironically, and karmically, failure of the ERA to pass has been credited with explaining why and when feminism diverged into the modern movement that is now so opposed by MRAs (and much of society). I think the trick will be …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:13 PM
2

Will all MRAs who think oppression of men is worse than slavery consider savagely beating up your partner is a reasonable response to anything think this guy is representative of the MRM please upvote my comment? If this does not describe your beliefs, please just leave the comment alone, don't downvote. Note to AgainstMensRights: just brigade as normal, thank you
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:31 PM
1

I'm not seeing anything at your link...
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:08 PM
1

More serious reply, it's a game by a woman about depression. In the current SJW/feminist view of the world seen that surrounds us, including at Steam, why wouldn't such a game be INSTANTLY greenlit, because you go grrl, empowerment, etc.?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:40 PM
1

Come and see teh violence inherent in the system! Help Help I'm being oppressed!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:37 PM
2

false accusations and the need for proof Bingo!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:35 PM
1

Come and see teh violence inherent in the system! Help Help I'm being oppressed!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:35 PM
1

Come and see teh violence inherent in the system! Help Help I'm being oppressed!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:35 PM
3

I think I'd ban you just for being a cunt.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:34 PM
4

It's true and funny that knowyourmeme has had one of the most readable breakdowns on this whole clusterfuck.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:31 PM
5

TOS is whatever the reddit admins think TOS is. The video is largely unsubstantiated. There is scant proof she slept with 5 guys, or she slept with them in exchange for positive press. Copy and pasted unaudited chat logs are terrible proof. This makes the video an enormous legal liability, and reddit has been very very wrong in the recent past when its users perform any sort of investigation.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:28 PM
0

Basically, what TotalBiscuit says: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1s4nmr1/
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:25 PM
0

It struck me: the "proof" she slept around consists of this guy's claims chat logs I have a hard time believing in 2014 that chat logs are proof of anything. So I am left with his claims. I also saw a video of some dude log into facebook and retrieve emails. But even that is pretty trivial to fake, and the video is a shit video where facebook is already open on the screen and there is a weird gray translucent box (that he shifts around on screen with his mouse) obscuring much of everything. Othe…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:12 PM
0

Yes, thanks, I finally found those. Did you read his site, the weird shit about the jigsaw puzzle -- I still don't know wtf that was about. The jigsaw puzzle that apparently isn't real, but had the name of her lovers on it? It's hard for me to understand how someone making these claims creates such a weird site.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:05 PM
1

It's interesting this is dated today. I came by to say from the title this sounds like one of the first Eugene Volokh posts I ever read, years and years ago. Volokh annoys me. He is a brilliant First Amendment civil rights professor who clearly has some life experience with the issues that arise in family law. Damnit, there are plenty of brilliant First Amendment lawyers. Eugene, what we need is for you and the Conspiracy to throw some monkey wrenches into family court.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:55 AM
3

Well you posit she slept with game reviewers, I posit she may have just slept with Steam itself, or maybe just a huge contingent of gamers.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:36 AM
1

A private baptist school fires a professor for not being baptist enough. What's the issue?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:19 AM
0

What's the issue?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:11 AM
-1

Yeah, I'm getting flack from this all over. Given reddit's doxxing rules it's hard to discuss it. But so far, the evidence I've seen that she slept with journalists is nothing apart from accusation. IF there is evidence, I think that's the heart of the issue, and the folks making this big should make this evidence the first and loudest thing they present.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:38 PM
2

I'm not dealing with the harassment issue, but the BIG thing about this affair is the claim she slept with journalists to bribe them. I can certainly believe that like with Sarkeesian, much of the harassment claims are exaggerated there was some amount of harassment
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:45 PM
0

I watched the entire video and while it makes some strong points, it undermines itself by never providing any sort of proof whatsoever that Quinn slept with anyone Quinn slept with the named journalists Quinn slept with the journalists to curry favor Is modern journalism shit? Of course, we see that everyday in mensrights how full of shit the media is, how corrupt they are, and how biased. But this story seems underwhelming. Had they provided proof it would mainly be a story of rotten corrupt jo…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:58 PM
3

The saddest thing is that my story is not uncommon Your's is very close to my story as well. Best wishes
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:36 PM
1

I think there are some fundamental issues revolving around sex, consent and rape that all of society could address in a more sophisticated fashion revolving around rape so yes, I see many conflicts in men's issues (as well as in feminism) depending on who you ask and what their personal philosophies are.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:23 PM
1

I think it's a very reasonable question, and I think you are mistaken to call troll.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:19 PM
2

What part of the CRA does it violate? Please be specific.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:41 AM
3

Thanks for posting this. I have certainly had this happen to me. And of course, when I set boundaries, my ex encouraged my kids to mock them and me and made it possible for them to evade those boundaries and worse, used all of that to convince the court what a horrible father I was and why the kids didn't want to see me.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:33 AM
5

Well had I been on the board, and I'm basically dead to the school for the most part, but if this had been funded with school funds, I'd move to fire her. I don't mind outreach, but the one thing at Mudd I could have used was funding to conferences and real experience and advice with networking.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:09 AM
2

Class of well, I'm not saying. But it was when the Bates program was a thing and when there were only 4, no 5 dorms. My understanding is that President Klawe took school funds to send some amount of: All Mudd Freshman women / All Mudd Women (?) Other Claremont Colleges women (?) Interested nearby high school girls To CS conferences. And yet didn't send Mudd men to those conferences Can you tell me if any of that is correct? I think sending even just sending some amount of Mudd women to CS confer…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:01 AM
2

Is the pay gap 23 cents or 6 cents? Oliver thinks it doesn't matter (when he gets to the size of a dump), but it does matter and here's why. If historically at the time of the 1963 Equal Pay Act, the actual measured gap was 40 to 36 cents (http://www.infoplease.com/spot/equalpayact1.html) (http://www.pay-equity.org/info-time.html) Then we have two different scenarios: In 50 years the gap has only decreased from 36 cents to 23 cents In 50 years the gap has almost closed from 36 cents to 6 cents T…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:20 PM
6

"Not all feminists" is just a way of never taking responsibility for the shitheads and worse not acknowledging how feminist theory encourages their shit headed behavior. "I'm not that kind of feminist", no, but many of your peers are. It's a no true Scotsman fallacy and deflection. I know of very few MRAs that oppose ALL of feminism. But when they critique it, it shouldn't be met with the dismissal of NAFALT.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:23 PM
2

This is a terrific idea in general, and a good name to pick. I guess you're aware of Project Censored: http://www.projectcensored.org/ And there are lots of good stories from impeccable sources like Bill Moyers just by googling undereported stories
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:38 PM
1

VAWA Title IX Sexual harassment, hostile environments A zillion job acts that force various hiring or funding quotas to women Feminism is very involved in law and court
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:04 AM
16

The authors and their fans profess hatred for the movement, slander it as much as they possibly can, and are generally disdainful of anything to do with men's rights. BUT in every one of these articles the authors make sure to talk about how there are legitimate concerns: tended to drown out the voices of the more moderate and pro-feminist men’s groups fighting important social issues that affect men, such as sexual abuse in prisons, child custody rights, lack of shelter for homeless men and hig…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:06 AM
1

Sorry. I found the video funny on its own, but it also made me wonder if this is what feminists think: http://i.imgur.com/UJSuz1t.jpg http://i.imgur.com/YqoMvbA.jpg Reconstructed brain scan of Lindy West http://i.imgur.com/YqoMvbA.jpg
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:20 PM
9

You got it. She has casually posted crap like that about men or anyone who disagrees with her for a decade now and not a single other feminist has ever called her on her nastiness and her outright lies unless she has gotten into their grilles first.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:41 PM
0

So on a scale of -10 to 10, his links are like a -11 for distorting what the original article actually said, makes me think he is troll.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:59 PM
9

I think they fall into these categories woefully misinformed but zealous disingenuous feminist fighting dirty for what they consider the good fight truly stupid but zealous trolls Many of them are men. Many of their moderators are men. It's interesting. Moderator /u/mragoaway comes off as a disingenuous feminist fighting dirty for what they consider the good fight, but I can never quite tell if Aerik is just amazingly stupid or a troll.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:45 PM
27

Judge gives a two week unsupervised stay with a mother who has pled no contest to assault and who CPS sought fit to remove the child from her care in the past. Not just the submariner who lost in court. Sounds like the child lost too.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:38 PM
6

My comment (in moderation of course) The MRM may be known today for its radical, anti-feminist rhetoric, but it certainly didn’t start out that way. That's right. Feminists have silenced and defamed and misrepresented shown great disrespect to the men's movement for 40 years now. Instead of listening to them and creating any sort of dialog you called them names and lobbied against their interests and tossed them out of society. And you're surprised and shocked and dismayed and offended that over…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:51 PM
9

The women were unhappy. (IE the man was at fault) The men were bored (IE the man was at at fault) The key is " That is, women are far choosier about why, and with whom, they cheat." She is saying women only cheat when necessary, men are sluts and cheat when simply bored.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:25 PM
16

Interestingly, studies corroborated what I was seeing. In a study published last year in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, researchers at the Kinsey Institute found that it's no longer true that men cheat far more often than women do. In fact, they found that women and men cheat at about the same rate -- though, yes, for different reasons. Women tended to cheat because they were unhappy in a relationship or felt their partner didn't hold similar sexual beliefs. For men, the biggest factor was sex…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:19 AM
1

that's a joke It's an internet meme actually. They don't state that damage to the judge's reputation is worse than damage to anyone else's reputation. They literally don't talk about other people's reputations at all. Well, rewatch if you want to, but they do, they explicitly distinguish why his reputational damage is worse than if it had occurred to others. This suicidal person is an abuser and a liar who was a potential danger to the judge's physical health, who actually did irreparable harm t…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:14 AM
-1

Stating your opinion is what you are not doing. Acting pissy is what you have been doing. You started off with personal attacks calling me "tough guy" and going on from there. But you don't see that. At each and every step you made your response personal and nasty. Fuck off and fuck you.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:28 PM
0

Fine you win, running away after she falls to the ground unconscious with broken bones and other injuries was a stellar plan. You and he have a great future ahead of you.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:17 PM
2

That's why hit and run in vehicles is a crime. You don't leave unconscious people, or injured people, and especially not unconscious injured people alone. If you do, don't be surprised when society treats that action very harshly.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:51 PM
-5

I've been told women don't make false accusations, even ones scared of having their kids taken away, or scared of how parents or boyfriends might react, is there any reason to believe the videos the judge released? I've seen a lot of pixels in my days and I'm just saying you can do an awful lot with After Effects and Final Effects these days. MORE SERIOUSLY This judge is an asshole who lets a suicidal person and doing drugs "just leave" his apartment. At 9:30 they talk about the damage to the ju…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:43 PM
-1

Let me pump a shitload of Adrenaline and fear though you and let's see how you react. Especially when you know people are going to discriminate against you. Maybe even attack you. Let's see how well you do tough guy. If he fled the scene of an unconscious person and didn't call 911, he's an asshole. If he fled the scene of an unconscious person and didn't call 911, he should be kicked off the team.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:33 PM
5

Those are some interesting quotes, thank you. I'm not exactly sure what your point is... If you want to clarify, please do.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:24 PM
2

I wish the author and his mother the best. And I agree with the author as well. I think this is problematic: . This was partly because she seemed to perceive a woman living in her space as more of a rival and partly because the daily routines of coaxing and cajoling were facilitated by her flirtatious attitude to men. I can absolutely understand and sympathize with what the author is saying. I believe in the US at least, he is setting himself up for a hostile environment lawsuit.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:01 PM
5

Texas. And how the law and prosecutors and judges in many states collude against minorities the impoverished the mentally ill
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:53 PM
1

Reddit is toxic. I'd stay away if I could. :/
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:51 PM
1

Oh I agree. Also, for whatever reason, I haven't seen you recently, so good to see you.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:44 PM
4

The DA is a sexist asswipe unfit for his job. Not very impressed with the football player or anyone who knocks someone unconscious and then flees the scene. Both should have been charged, and I'm okay with his being kicked off the team.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:27 PM
3

Possibly :/
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:33 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/Jhn1W3m.jpg
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:20 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/Jhn1W3m.jpg
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:20 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/Jhn1W3m.jpg
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:20 AM
2

Yeah, I like it best when Big Red the Water Buffalo first stole the fat-tarded Lindy West's droppings and put the whole thing to musak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avu5NT1ZYT8 More of Big Red's Comic Stylings: https://www.google.com/search?q=big+red+feminist&source=lnms&tbm=vid Fat-tarded Lindy West's original heap of shite: jezebel.com/5992479/if-i-admit-that-hating-men-is-a-thing-will-you-stop-turning-it-into-a-self-fulfilling-prophecy
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:11 AM
13

World Star Hip Hop, what would we do without you?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:31 AM
5

Rock is an entertainer and goes wherever political correctness blows. I think that's unlikely given his material.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:32 AM
12

But he no longer says that because of how it is abused http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggas_vs._Black_People#Retirement The controversy caused by Rock's constant use of the word nigga led him to remove the piece from his act. In a 60 Minutes interview, Rock said, "By the way, I've never done that joke again, ever, and I probably never will. 'Cos some people that were racist thought they had license to say nigger. So, I'm done with that routine
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:22 AM
6

Thanks for posting this. If I read the article correctly, I'd like you to take down this link and repost it making it clear that in Lauren Bacalls' memoirs, Bogart was abused by his third wife Mayo Methot. Right now it reads as if Lauren Bacall abused Bogart.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:18 AM
1

I enjoy that in the video (Trigger Warning: Big Red) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH_ZryBfCtU#t=25 (25 seconds in) She says "50th Billionth"
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:02 AM
1

Bizarre story. The linked pdf is interesting, if only for the old time teletype font the Navy apparently still loves. You should xpost in /r/TheLastShip
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:12 PM
12

If you'd just shut the fuck up for the 50th billionth time...
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:08 PM
-4

No seriously, "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children"
/r/MensRights15/08/14 10:42 PM
-7

Michael Brown's mother is indeed the biggest victim here. So are the mother's of all other black men (and truly any man) killed by our over militarized (and many times bigoted) police.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 10:33 PM
-4

Only many feminists drink from troughs like cows. NOT ALL FEMINISTS drink from troughs like sows. I think you are over generalizing. In general drinking from a trough like a cow is not considered harmful. Many many cows drink from troughs just fine, and the milk they produce is wonderful. Pigs that drink or eat from a trough are wonderful when you just need some pork.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:56 PM
2

Check with a lawyer. The law is probably on your side. Send a letter from a lawyer, or a registered letter to the principal reminding them of the law in your state. They should do this regardless, but it may help to point out you have joint legal custody. Sucks, I've been there and been treated as non-existent by the schools. http://www.divorcenet.com/states/new_jersey/school_law_and_divorce Access to School Records Many times, after a divorce, custodial parents (parents with more parenting time…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:14 PM
1

Interesting video. As he says around 2:00 or so, when he says he will bake your noodle, my noodle was baked, mostly. Our huge prison populations are a complete scam, and the way we've privatized them makes the situation 10x worse.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:42 PM
1

Thanks, I appreciate that. One of my earliest memories was driving (as a 5 year old) through the Watts Riots. Then I worked in downtown LA during the 1992 LA Riots. And it stuns me how stupid and incompetent the Ferguson cops have been. And very much scares me and saddens me how the cops have turned into paramilitary forces.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:52 PM
3

Jesus, that Sheriff is a total fuckhead. If DOJ or FBI want to do something useful to uphold civil rights, they would investigate him. I appreciate the "grooming" language of the report: A yearlong investigation by 10 Investigates reveals many of the men whose mugshots have been paraded out by local sheriffs in made-for-TV press conferences were not seeking to meet children online. Instead, they were minding their own business, looking for other adults, when detectives started to groom and convi…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:19 PM
14

I am sorry for all you went through, but it reminds me how there are two or three separate justice systems one for people relying on public defenders one for people who can afford a few hours a month of a lawyer who has 50 or more other clients one for people who can afford dedicated full time lawyers. (I'm not saying you're in the latter group, only that I would be in the first or second group -- I've no one, including myself, who could afford to pay for a good defense lawyer for me. Thanks for…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:41 PM
13

I wonder how much these lawyers cost him financially. Sounds like hundreds of thousands.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:42 AM
3

Yeah, what's worse is I can't blame it on my phone. But I hear ya, if it's any consolation I have a raging case of repetitive stress injury -- at times typing can be horrible. Still, I can remember when I was alert enough to fix these on the first go around.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:11 AM
1

These excerpts from a recent article may help. Go find the book Maccoby Mnookin book ANTI-DAD NARRATIVE COMES UNHINGED August 10, 2014 by Robert Franklin, Esq. https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/21842-anti-dad-narrative-comes-unhinged Just 4% of cases actually go to trial. And mothers often get custody in large part because, on average, they’re still the primary caretakers of children. That’s not bias, and it’s not even necessarily a good thing. It’s just a fact. No, actually bias …
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:09 AM
7

(save yourself, and keep it that way, it's a huge pit)
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:57 AM
28

Yes, that's Jessica Valenti. Feminist thought leader, Guardian columnist, ...
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:48 AM
58

Men speak of their their hardships, their oppression, the difficulties they face in life, their depressions, Valenti: "I BATHE IN MALE TEARS" Robin Williams dies: To quote many others, fuck depression She fails to see how feminism OR her T shirt might can cause male tears doesn't acknowledge men's real hardships might exacerbate a depressed man's depression leading to who knows what uses dead Robin Williams to sell Jessica Valenti as a human being capable of compassion
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:21 AM
23

Wow. Score!
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:18 AM
9

Presumably only gets what the prosecutor got. which is not everything, and in particular not from other witnesses the prosecutor did not ask for records for. I think that's made clear in the article.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:34 AM
3

It's also interesting in light of this article today: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/15/technology/web-trolls-winning-as-incivility-increases.html Web Trolls Winning as Incivility Increases Which is mainly seen from a men harassing women point of view.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:23 AM
1

tribble collections. We have bigass tribble collections. Thanks to your mom who gave us her pelt.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:21 AM
10

Meh. VICE committed an actual act of journalism. In doing so they highlight the nuts that radical feminism harbors.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:52 AM
5

Well my guess is yes, you have time to pull out, but no time for anything else. I wrote a song about it. Like to hear it? Here it go! One stroke over the line sweet Jesus One stroke over the line Jailed' downtown in a po-lice station One stroke over the line
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:45 AM
1

From what I saw of the livestream, I was shocked that the cops would fire on them, even "just" rubber bullets. Even "mere" tear gas! Completely unjustifiable and worse, provocative and incompetent. Yet the media focused on the destructive reaction of a small segment of the community (and some reports suggest the mayhem was largely perpetrated by opportunistic outsiders), eclipsing yet another senseless death of an unarmed African-American teenager at the hands of authorities. But the media do in…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:24 AM
1

I am not a lawyer so I can't take a position. The link is from early 2013. What happened in these cases? Thanks for linking it.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:19 AM
1

Reddit tells me you have never commented in /r/MensRights and this is your first post here. So what do you mean precisely by "fellow MRAs" Reddit also tells me that at the least you're a troll.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:10 PM
11

Yes, and I think it's worse than that in ways many people have forgotten. 10 years ago we all found out that California has a 0 second rape law http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=125440&page=1&singlePage=true "A withdrawal of consent effectively nullifies any earlier consent and subjects the male to forcible rape charges if he persists in what has become nonconsensual intercourse," Justice Ming Chin wrote for the majority. The justices did acknowledge that problems could arise from "the possibly…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:28 PM
1

Oh, I agree there is a ton of issues with how the programs are implemented, how they could be reformed, and how the programs would benefit from flexibility and an updating to the 21st century. And yeah, sadly I know this from personal experience too. But as I said, I won't argue with the concepts of either child support or alimony.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:01 PM
2

I think he's basically correct. And having followed his links and his comments before, I think if he is mistaken here it is because he is mistaken, not because he is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:58 PM
0

Your first paragraph is fine, and I thank you for the clarification. Your second paragraph marks you as an asshole. Apparently in your world people can't be ignorant and be corrected, they have to be disingenuous at best.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:50 AM
1

Custody support is there to provide for your children Alimony is meant to recognize the fact that in many if not most marriages, one person has sacrificed their ability to earn an income by working in the home including parenting. More and more states award alimony for shorter periods of time, usually half the length of the marriage. And alimony may not go just to the women, the wife may owe that to the husband (very rare of course.) Ostensibly, I have no problems with the concepts of either ali…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:21 AM
1

STUDENT FINANCIAL AID Men, born after December 31, 1959, who aren't registered with Selective Service won't qualify for Federal student loans or grant programs. This includes Federal Pell Grants, Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (FSEOG), Direct Stafford Loans/Plus Loans, National Direct Student Loans, and College Work Study. CITIZENSHIP The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) makes registration with Selective Service a condition for U.S. citizenship if the man fi…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:14 AM
5

Here is a list of state by state requirements for registration: https://www.sss.gov/fsstateleg.htm A lot of them list things like registration among a certain age group of men is required if those men want a driver's license or school aid or state employment. As the wiki says Most states, as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and Virgin Islands, have passed laws requiring registration for men 18–25 to be eligible for programs that vary on a per-jurisdiction basis b…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:52 AM
2

OP, when you start reading MR sites you will find a great deal of advocacy for all men regarding parenting rights regarding false rape accusations regarding child support regarding due process devaluation of men disposability of men declining unskilled jobs for men In addition, topics many MRAs I know follow are about militarization of America's police forces over charging of prosecutors corruption of the system Serious question nate, Did you come here to troll? Or do you always come to forums a…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:42 PM
0

Actually that's absolutely 10000% inaccurate. I wouldn't be surprised if I had something, including bipolar, but no.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:04 PM
-6

Oh, so now you're just whargarbling. Okay doc, thanks for your insights and demands we listen to you because being a sufferer means you're a psychologist. Best part is since this is the net you've no idea what my own experiences are.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:53 PM
-1

My point is not that Robin was well adjusted, but that Internet Psychology Diagnoses are, well, just bunk, and often insulting to everyone involved. Diagnoses across the Internet or TV of other people are unethical for professionals and uninformed and idiotic for non-professionals. They are usually used against people. They are a refuge of the incompetent. So I don't think it's reasonable for us to look to your insights as to William's mental state. If you want to tell us what you felt, fine. Ot…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:15 PM
0

Your degree in Psychology comes from where now?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:58 PM
1

I think Universities do have a duty to protect students from rapists and violence. But it's clear they have no clue or ability to investigate and adjudicate without infringing on due rights and jeopardizing criminal trials, jeopardizing careers, etc. I think Universities should coordinate with the local police and prosecutors to make sure any sort of allegation of criminal nature, sexual or violent or anything results in cops rapidly (24/48) hours to investigate charge and backgrounds of both st…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:05 PM
2

I see Big Red got her own personal callout. While I enjoy the lulz, I'm not exactly sure that's fair, it has been a year or so since I last heard she was onsite at one of these protests. (While certainly her blog is up to the minute in its anti-male idiocy.) It does point in general to her and her hair being very telegenic the easy and cheap shots of all media
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:53 PM
46

There are multiple reports from multiple independent news sources linking his suicide to his financial troubles and his divorces, using statements he gave to friends. This is not feminists literally leaping from Elliot Rodgers to #YesAllMen
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:59 AM
1

Jesus, viper is right, but bottom feeding scum sucker might be more accurate.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:16 PM
6

@TheRealNietzsche44 after one week on Twitter tweeted: when you troll long into the net the net also trolls unto you
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:48 PM
5

I wonder why such the huge drop in just two years (and sadly, I don't think it's just the feminism articles.)
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:58 PM
4

Test: Was this article written by a troll: 1: Is it at Buzzfeed?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:20 PM
3

This was my response a few days ago when financial abortion was discussed, scroll to find how I respond to the question of whether taxpayers will pick up the tab I've been told abortions are safer than pregnancy women do not suffer mentally or physically from an abortion And I believe women can abort adopt give up their fetus/babies And I believe many economists and others believe pregnancies harm the economic and educational potential of teenagers and the otherwise disadvantaged I can't see any…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:16 PM
2

Yes, that was pretty awful. How do you propose she be dealt with?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:57 PM
4

Once more, my own inability to feel poutrage affects how I view various submissions.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:55 PM
3

Thank you so much for writing this. My ex alienated my kids from me using what sounds like very similar techniques. I don't have anything to ask you. I haven't seen my kids for three years, and I am hoping I will be around if they decide to see me. I text them occasionally, to wish them happy birthday, and things like that, but they never respond. I miss them greatly. I also feel guilty that when I finally left them to their mother (after the court psychologist who interviewed them made it quite…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:53 PM
20

I am not a journalist, and reading the NPR response, that's what I ended up thinking. BUT, that was not that journalist's response! His answer showed no research and no insight and not even an awareness there might be an actual answer. And worse, he didn't see that even given the answer he did give, how having the same result be reported in the same way at every news report at NPR and any media site was a defacto bias even if he and NPR had no intent of that. It was truly a clueless response thr…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 02:51 PM
12

I always get downvoted for pointing this out, but in the first video while the mother should not have hit the guy, the skater AND his cameraman were both skating OUTSIDE the skatepark and were skating in a public plaza where people and kids could be expected to walk, run, play, sit down and have snacks. The woman should have hit no one, but 100% responsibility for the accident is on the skater for skating outside the skatepark and bowling over a little kid who was where he was supposed to be, pl…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:59 PM
10

Welcome to reddit, 1 day troll.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 02:26 AM
2

http://www.volokh.com/2011/04/21/vibrators/
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:36 PM
1

It's a Hasidic show. Hasids always keep men and women separated. Update: Personally, I don't think this is a big deal, but I note that Law Professor Jonathan Turley disagrees, and when Professor Turley speaks, I listen, and learn... http://jonathanturley.org/2014/08/08/hasidic-ladies-night-new-york-club-agrees-to-bar-men-for-orthodox-jewish-band/
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:19 AM
1

I can certainly understand the description of this as racist. The only men harassing the women by asking for a smile are black. Two white men are shown. One is on the street and does nothing. The other is an instructor at Smile Bitch camp and so is instructing, not harassing. In the meantime, a diverse group of women are shown, white, black and asian. Given who made this, IE, feminists, it doubly shocking it would be racist.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:39 PM
2

Hey skeptic, JSTOR has 750,000 references for God. That god can be found at JSTOR does not prove that god exists. That patriarchy can be found at JSTOR does not prove that patriarchy exists. It merely proves that idiots in feminist departments think it does. http://i.imgur.com/Tw4FUsm.jpg
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:05 AM
2

If any have great cleavage, please leave some links.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:59 AM
3

Heh, the media told her that women are her competition.... I think Laci Green needs to go out and observe girls starting at about age 8. And maybe see Queen Bees and Wanna Bes. And Heather, and all sorts of stuff.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:58 AM
6

Interesting but well, actually not as supportive as I would have preferred. Here's Christopher Hitchens on Free Speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyoOfRog1EM
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:53 AM
-1

Worse, I think this makes "us" look petty rigid humorless prescriptive I disagree with much of feminism but I am not at a war with women and I don't mind, and even encourage the understanding there will always be a gentle rivalry and flirtation between the sexes.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:52 AM
1

Pun. I stole that a year ago from some thread on fark, and it just fits so well, I use it whenever I can.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:41 PM
1

Making papers slightly higher quality by taking almost twice as longer to research and write them is not worth it. Anyone working this way should learn the value of deadlines. Work output in the real world isn't just about producing, it is about producing in a timely manner. My science was wrong and later overturned, but I was able to consistently get it out the door on time and shipped to our customers. In doing so, I garnered 25% more grants than the next guy and 35% more grants than the woman…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:16 PM
5

I am going to fail to be poutraged over this joke. Sorry.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:13 PM
4

The whole essay is rather incoherent. The most generous interpretation I can give to the first quote is that Futrelle is a shitty writer who failed to provide what he might think of as an alternative for example, maybe he thinks the solution is not marriage, but child support and being a "baby daddy" is. And he seems to fail to provide this alternative throughout the piece leaving it to the reader to either think "woe, woe, woe what are we to do!" or maybe think indeed "let the kids get married"…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:04 PM
3

Marc Randazza is good stuff, one of the collection of well known free speech lawyers defending speech. I disagreed with him slightly about being appalled by the two week suspension: my understanding is that those who made that decision about the suspension are privy to some unreleased video tape. So my belief about the length of the suspension is caveated knowing they know a lot more about what happened inside the elevator then I do.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:21 PM
72

Agreed. It's only via their wallet that you can bring about change in institutions. The lawsuit has to be big enough to get the board of directors and alumni to sit up and take interest. And I would find any grounds to include the President of the School, the Dean of Students, and the Title IX director as individuals on the lawsuit. Let them have some sleepless nights and worry about losing their precious homes.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:42 PM
22

Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome are real things, and recognized in degrees by the DSM V where it is called parent child relational disorder. If you have any spare change, please donate some to local PAS support groups. https://www.google.com/search?q=parental%20alienation%20support I'm a victim. My children are victims. Maybe someday we'll see each other again.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:14 PM
7

A better piece than most but... was better than most pieces regarding Elam's Hit a bitch satire, but ethically / journalistically should have gone the extra step no feminist journalist takes and mentioned the title and nature of the Jezebel piece avoids the issue of why these women are driving the conversation, namely because when men like Warren Farrell, Glenn Sacks, etc. have brought up these same issues they have been unfairly vilified by feminists since she was a primary witness to the confe…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:16 PM
-1

Hey look, it's a demonstration from the fucktarded asshole on how to make friends and influence people. You also do a wonderful job of exemplifying the benefits of good reading skills.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:08 AM
1

YOU might not have wrote that, but it is a common opinion. The recent defeats of circ bans in Europe have all been due to spurious claims of "anti-Semitism". I think it's very important to be absolutely clear and careful when making such a serious accusation, instead of applying it to every position you don't agree with. I didn't write that, and I was explicit in what I wrote. The best arguments apply the principle of maximum charity to their opposition Which you failed to apply to me
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:31 AM
-3

Check out my downvotes MERELY for saying yes I do find some it alienating and I do find some of it anti-semitic but that I ALSO find MUCH of it on target. Even for suggesting such a thing, I am downvoted, and then some fucktarded asshole suggests I am a sockpuppet of the OP. That's how these discussions are over the top and alienating. They have the same toxic speech policing as many of the cunts in any feminist forum.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:44 AM
0

Honestly, I don't see this. There is a disproportionately large number of Jewish intactivists as well (i.e. with a lot of criticism coming from within, how is any criticism of MGM necessarily anti-Semitic?). What's your argument for this claim? Did I write: how is any criticism of MGM necessarily anti-Semitic? No. I did not. What did I write? a lot of it borders on anti-semitism, if not directly then certainly in the terrible lack of both diplomacy and understanding of context. And those posts a…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:37 AM
-8

For me it depends on the nature of the criticism. A good deal of it is alienating for the reasons you describe and others. Frankly, a lot of it borders on anti-semitism, if not directly then certainly in the terrible lack of both diplomacy and understanding of context. And those posts are worse than alienating, they are counterproductive. But much of the criticism is on target. The posts that are on target, the posts that I disagree with but express legitimate opinion or offer studies or surveys…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:41 AM
1

Should be stickied at the top of this thread.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:33 PM
1

I apologize, but I am compelled to say: Go on...
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:05 AM
5

Reddit's rules pretty much preclude much activism from occurring. I view this subreddit's purpose as consciousness raising discussion And look elsewhere for activism which might be lobbying to change custody laws to better support joint equal custody lobbying to change laws that affect men (sentencing, prison safety, draft, healthcare, college sexual misconduct trials) working in shelters for the homeless, domestic violence shelters, distributing food to the homeless working as a paralegal to he…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:58 AM
3

I saw that too. It was a mistake to take it down because it's not like David Futrelle and others don't have screencaps of it. And it's not like the myriad FALSE claims made about the page on other websites can no longer be referenced when making new false claims. Taking it down will look like an admission of guilt or regret and will prevent people from reading the page in context. It does make it difficult for MRA supporters to read and link to the page in context. A better solution for AVFM wou…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:48 AM
1

t's a sucky situation, but I can see why they would want to remove the children from the situation. That's why it's a trump card and abusive of the court. The courts don't have the time or money to examine the claim. But they are naturally A) concerned for the children and B) deathly afraid of what would happen to the judge if the mother was accurate. So remember expected value? The shrink/judge thinks: the chance the mother is telling the truth is low, but if she is telling the truth the cost (…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:28 PM
1

It's a sucky situation, but I can see why they would want to remove the children from the situation. I would HOPE, and maybe this is where I'm naive, that any charges that are sent to the court would be investigated somewhat by the police before it got to that point. But as I say, this is where I may be being naive, and years of watching DA's on CSI and Law and Order ordering investigators to "bring me proof before I can file charges!" have led me astray. They are certainly not evaluated by cops…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:24 PM
1

I edited it to clarify. Complaints that appears only on affidavits to a court during a divorce and nowhere else is evidence of abuse of the court, the father, and the children.... It's abuse of the court because it forces the court to delay because it makes the stakes so high: "danger to the children!" But it's a false accusation. It's basically perjury. And it should be treated that way. This is not just my story. OP's link and the claim of many men some here many elsewhere is this sort of abus…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:07 PM
0

No, it's really not. If mom has genuine suspicions, there will be doctor reports, police reports, teacher testimony, witness testimony. Testimony that appears only on affidavits to a court during a divorce and nowhere else is evidence of abuse of the court, the father, and the children....
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:47 AM
0

No, it's really not. If mom has genuine suspicions, there will be doctor reports, police reports, teacher testimony, witness testimony. Testimony that appears only on affidavits to a court during a divorce and nowhere else is evidence of abuse. It's malicious abuse, it's a false accusation. It should be recognized for what it is.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:47 AM
3

That's the point. The courts, the judges, the shrinks, they see absence of evidence and let me tell you they say literally, Mrs. Flathead has shown no evidence to show Mr. Flathead is a danger to his children, but her claim is so serious, we must ask Mr. Flathead to see a therapist and we will put this hearing off for six months. Apart from the names, that's a literal quote. In those six months, the kids haven't seen you and you haven't see the kids, and the separation grows until it cannot be r…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:01 AM
1

Outrageous. And typical. As usual when I read these sorts of briefs, I am always interested in what other lawyers would have to say about it. It looks great to me, but how do other professionals see it?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:47 AM
4

Side note: I am a psychologist and if you aren't finding people asking the questions you want asked then join the field and do it yourself. Just don't be surprised once you find out that the world isn't as clean as you'd like and the answers, even the small ones, are harder to get at than you'd imagine. You have to be a total cunt to say that to a group of adults. Yes, quit your jobs, go back to school, become psychologists, do it yourself. What a callous, arrogant response. Typical of a psychol…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:36 AM
2

In this case, I'd say absence of evidence is evidence of lying about it. Where the absence of evidence is often no evidence whatsoever that the father is anything other than a loving father. No history of complaints to cops No history of complaints from school No history of complaints from doctors No history of complaints from neighbors And complaints from mother are based around court dates are told to lawyers and court shrinks but not to others If you ask me, all of that is evidence the mother…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:07 AM
1

Sadly, I would take self-identified ideological talking points. I think most of these talking points have been handed down to them. But otherwise, exactly that.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:02 AM
5

(it's satire)
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:42 PM
2

Thanks just watched it. After watching it, my guess is that like most of the pieces on the conference, they saw none of it, saw none of the raw conference footage, and were just basing their feelz off of the misrepresentations of other journalists they politically align themselves with. Serwer. Hesse. Raw Story, etc. Some of that just makes me realize that 95% of what I see that claims to be journalism is the same thing. Not reporting, but a reporter's gut feelz.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:22 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:06 PM
0

fwiw, the other readers there are claiming it to be satire.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:48 PM
5

FWIW (approximately nothing) DD has made me cringe, especially with her intentional rape jokes, but I can't remember any times I've thought her wrong. JB I think has hit the nail on the head and punched very strongly in her writing and her images, but there are times I've found her to be wrong, or even crossed a line. I think something AVFM, or someone should do, is provide many of the various MRA writers editing. Fact check them. Keep them on message. Help them write a message that will appeal …
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:30 PM
2

I'm short, out of shape, older, have a serious heart condition, never actually learned how to fight, I suspect most 20-40 something in shape gym going women are literally stronger than I am. If they've taken self-defense, karate, boxing, martial arts or whatever, they are way ahead of me. So I can hit them and they can't strike back, right?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:25 PM
1

No I didn't. If you happen to find a link to it, please post it!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:21 PM
3

If you find a link to the segment would you post it? Thanks
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:37 PM
85

Women who are against feminism are: young ignorant self-loathing internalized misogynists trying to suck up to men parroting male talking points dumb actually are feminists just don't know it. unable to attract anyone to them based on their own intelligence, charm and wit (added after watching Lizz Winstead discuss why women might support MRAs (http://www.msnbc.com/now-with-alex-wagner/watch/an-international-conference-on-men-s-rights--296068675959)) Women who are against feminism are not educat…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:42 AM
18

Thanks I added a comment to that effect, but then the reddit gears cranked and cranked and it somehow vanished.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:26 AM
5

We'd be hearing a lot more news stories/police reports of "attempted abductions" from bars if that was really happening all the time. And seeing more CCTV of the actual attempts
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:32 PM
4

I got my MBA mid 90s at Berkeley (top 10 B school) To solve this problem, one needs to look beyond the “subtle digs” or “death by a thousand paper cuts” reported by at least one member of the UCLA task force. Take the aggressive teaching practices that are legendary in MBA programs. Students are goaded into a combative mode, as if this were necessary to survive in business, even though the more “feminine” skill of consensus building is actually more highly valued. We should ask how young female …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:57 PM
2

I've seen lists like this before, and I think there is a ton of truth to them, but one thing that does make me reconsider are the tons and tons of testimonies I've read on the net from people claiming to be bartenders or bouncers that also claim to have been eyewitnesses to the roofie attempt itself. I have to say though, it seems in any forum, that fully 3/4s of the participants have had experience as bartenders or bouncers. I've honestly never known quite what to make of that either. I honestl…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:52 PM
3

I think it's brilliant of JtO to call them college age bimbos and comparing them to mollusks and single cell organisms. He always has a way with words and knows how to make enemies from potential allies. That JtO, he's some JtO that JtO.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:32 PM
3

Yeah, I am certain being elected prosecutor and then judge are still on her todo list though.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:50 PM
12

I found her name somewhere and googled her, Sonny Hostin, not a judge, but a former assistant US Atty. So perhaps more than just an atty. Definitely an asshole.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:45 PM
7

Who is she? Is she a judge? I assumed she was a lawyer.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:50 PM
4

I am 5'8 and 174, and no you should not hit me back. /s
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:46 PM
13

My guess is most women and most mothers would agree with her. Women who went through hell in high school Mothers especially who have sons, or who have learned about natural consequences.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:44 PM
5

Damn straight Whoopi, and thank you.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:41 PM
-6

Tell it to a judge any time you hit a child when you are on a skateboard, bicycle, car or wherever and in a place zoned for pedestrians and not for you. Stop being a ridiculous fuckface. We are all just laughing at you now. Also, learn how to analyse photos and how to measure and how to measure a line on a 45 when the metric you've been given is horizontal. You smell of ass.
/r/PussyPass29/07/14 12:36 AM
-1

No, if you weren't a fucktard apologist handing out pussy passes you would acknowledge this douchbag was outside the skatepark. The analysis are done here and at fark and all over the net, but you can't help hand out pussy passes. You are absolutely fucking worse than the feminists you decry. I say that as an MRA, but one that has some honesty and integrity.
/r/PussyPass29/07/14 12:35 AM
-10

http://i.imgur.com/IbhMtjh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8BvzdjF.jpg More like 20 - 40 feet, and either way, way outside the clearly designated park boundary. It's one thing to think the woman should not have assaulted the guy. It's terribly funny to see all the pussy passes handed out to this douchebag and is partner filming the fucking thing when they are both skating outside the skate park, ignoring the rules, and don't have any assholes to clear their way.
/r/PussyPass28/07/14 11:39 PM
5

FWIW, my complete and total speculation is that he did not pay personally for prlog to distribute it, but that prlog and gwu have some sort of account for gwu professors to flog their activities and he made use of that account.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:02 PM
2

This is what passes for reporting ... at NPR
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:47 PM
5

The first thing I would want to do were I accused at Harvard is find an attorney to sue to halt the process ASAP before the one week was up, presumably within 24 hours of being notified. That assumes the money to hire an attorney... That said, if this policy is placed in the catalog a student is admitted under, it strikes me, and I am not a lawyer, this policy would be legal as would any agreement in writing between two parties to any settlements of via arbitration (including Jewish Bet Din or I…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:18 PM
91

I don't think she understood what he was saying. This video will be posted somewhere as "Bill Burr mansplaining"
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:32 PM
1

I said I had no opinion about it in parent comments and again in the comment you just responded to. If you haven't read feminists having a problem with 50 year old men dating 25 year old women, you don't know feminism like you claim to. You are a complete and total dipshit. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:12 PM
1

I have no opinion on the cock carousel. I am curious how feminists treated you when you defended 50 year old men dating 25 year old girls.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:45 AM
12

I try to stop and speak out against any and all injustice I can. Of course, that's why I am not a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:14 AM
7

touche!
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:11 AM
2

It's a non question that almost never arises framed as you or David Futrelle or TRP frames it in Mens Rights. If you think that "the cock carousel" is nature and not nurture, well so is murder and rape as we see not just throughout history but in chimpanzees and other primates and other mammals. So since you are okay with the cock carousel while I have no opinion on it, please explain why you are okay with cock carousel - nature 50 year old men dating 25 year old women - nature But not okay with…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:34 PM
-6

This video is about a year old and has been dissected everywhere, including MensRights.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 10:25 PM
1

Context is everything, they define the rules or lack of them. In a dark alley there are none, at a party with friends there are. I can't help but think of minute 4:00 to 4:30 here Even dark alley's have rules...
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:22 PM
2

'zactly. Best outcome for him is he just a troll Looking at it again, I got it wrong, and I think it's worse. It's not just superiority of women, it's supremacy of women.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:12 PM
-7

Your momma's a whore
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 08:10 PM
6

Hey troll, I like where in /r/cuckold[1] you say you have a female superiority supremacy fetish http://np.reddit.com/r/Cuckold/comments/2b6ezv/am_i_the_only_one_who_wants_my_wife_to_actually/cj28urn[2] It probably wouldn't have turned you on if your wife had cheated on you? Then what exactly turns you on about cuckolding? I've always thought of cuckolding as being the less extreme version of cheating (it's basically roleplaying that your wife's cheating on you). So, I've always assumed that ever…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:09 PM
3

Do you actually want me to answer your questions? http://i.imgur.com/IZuQJfx.jpg
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:08 PM
-21

I see, when you can't admit to being wrong, you literally shift the skatepark. Talk about pussy pass, here you are demanding a pussy pass for your own mistakes.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 08:06 PM
3

Whatever dude.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:00 PM
-25

No dumbass, he absolutely was out of bounds. Check the fucking images I posted shit for brains. Cannery Park, Hayward California.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 07:59 PM
2

I got to the third "It's a miracle".
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:56 PM
1

Hey cool a 100 minute video. I'll be watching this one. Some day.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:55 PM
-41

Hey fucktard, where the child was was a park. Where the skater was was a park. The skatepark was elsewhere and the douchebag skater was responsible. Don't have any children at all, you'll single handedly bring world IQs down.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 07:54 PM
2

Is there anything wrong with women riding the "cock carousel"? Is there anything wrong with 50 year old men picking up 25 year old women? Is there anything wrong with women riding the "cock carousel"? If this is nature, if this were shown to be some part of innate, biological pressure, perhaps seen in other primates, would you consider it wrong for men to kill other men who invaded their territory? rape women to make sure she would be pregnant with the most recent victor? If this is nurture, if …
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:53 PM
-35

Of course you let your kids run around at a park. I am a parent and I understand this basic concept.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 07:13 PM
16

http://i.imgur.com/4UHqHmf.jpg Here is the park where the accident took place, the arrowhead is approximate. IIRC The dude should never have been hit There IS a skatepark there, but he was outside the skatepark Offsetting douchebag penalties, and yes, she has mostly gotten a pussy pass for this. http://i.imgur.com/WdonZAd.jpg
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 07:03 PM
2

Back up your statement that co-sleeping is like drunk driving. Then tell me about bunk.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:53 PM
1

Those two are not nearly equivalent. Stop being a dumbass. Putting the life of your child in danger is pretty high up in my "shit not to do" list. letting a child ride a bicycle on the street letting a child play in a playground unattended letting your child alone in a car while you run into a convenience store for 5 minutes allowing men to be in a child's park allowing men to take pictures at soccer practice allowing men to be single parents allowing homosexual men to adopt giving men the vote …
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:25 PM
3

Yeah well, no accounting for pinheads that equate drinking and driving with properly co-sleeping with a child. Hell, I must be a Schrodinger's Baby Killer by your eyes. Let's fix your silliness: My wife (ex) and I drank and drove with both our kids until about 9 months or so. For us at least, it was a wonderful experience. And I'm serious, for me, it was certainly one of the best experiences of my life. Every driver must make their own determination, but I would recommend any new 21 year old con…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:07 PM
2

I would like to think this is salient advice, but where I live, in Phoenix, asking for a cop on the non-emergency number is ranked in absolute last place on a cop's list of things to do. My experience in Phoenix is that: if you ask for a cop now, they will not show if there is ANYTHING else they have to do if you ask for a cop at a certain time (say to witness a child custody exchange) they will not show if there is ANYTHING else they have to do I hope this is not the case in your town, but in P…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:19 PM
1

So, I am genuinely curious, did she tattoo a turquoise necklace on herself?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:10 PM
4

My wife (ex) and I co-slept with both our kids until about 9 months or so. For us at least, it was a wonderful experience. And I'm serious, for me, it was certainly one of the best experiences of my life. Every family must make their own determination, but I would recommend any new father consider it.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:02 PM
6

One or more of this subreddit's surveys showed: more of this subreddit identifies as gay or bisexual than in society at large more of this subreddit identifies as gay or bisexual than the rest of reddit outside of specific GLBTQUIAA subs My suggestion to most people who ask these questions is that they stick around and lurk and see for themselves what the subreddit is about.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:59 PM
2

Yes it will. many/most of the topvoted comments were damning of fathers one way or another.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:05 PM
13

Admins would never do that, they are too scared of the SRS and public backlash. The admins are fucktards, every last one of them.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:58 PM
2

Fuck off moron.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 01:58 PM
4

I don't know what to make of your account. If some folks were alarmed by it and called the cops, I think that is within the realm of reasonable behavior. Let the cops investigate. If they are harassing you by contacting friends, employers and business associates, or others in your community, that's way out of line. A statement from your ex will do nothing, because ya know, reddit and throwaways and neither of you will seem credible. However, I think you can produce some reasonable evidence that …
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:55 PM
3

I would love to see the sexes reversed here Considering it is a remake of the gender reversed movie...
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:57 PM
2

Before I write a letter to the editor, I would like to see what you wrote.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:51 PM
7

I'm already on the side of equal rights and equal opportunity. Feminists can join me whenever they wish.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:20 PM
6

My understanding is that private businesses can still be public acommodations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_accommodations Within US law, public accommodations are generally defined as entities, both public and private, that are used by the public. Examples include retail stores, rental establishments and service establishments, as well as educational institutions, recreation facilities and service centers. Private clubs and religious institutions are exempt. Public accommodation must be …
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:49 AM
-2

FASCIST!!1!
/r/MensRights20/07/14 07:29 PM
1

Given her age and when she grew up and her cultural identity, it's not surprising that Barbara Kay would be against prostitution, though it's not clear how she would react to this incident in which many of the most harmful forms of trafficking were outlawed.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:28 PM
8

It's an interesting accidental study of the effects of legalizing prostitution and coheres with the arguments of many of all political stripes, liberal, libertarian, and even conservatives. Why not read the article and make a comment that aids the conversation instead of just being an asshole?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:23 PM
1

Fuck you throwaway troll and your bullshit story.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:12 PM
2

Yes, exactly. You would have to ask Elizabeth Johnson...
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:12 PM
1

I get the impression Cooper knows Denver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ISzf2pryI&feature=kp
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:22 PM
1

FWIW, Without audio, I saw the slide at 3:23, but thank you for watching till it shows and then describing the actual context. I think: AVFM is often idiotic in what it publishes based on how it will be misconstrued by feminists and opponents The media should be much better than that and should be demanded to do the research Since Palmatier's point was completely reasonable though one could disagree with it when taken in context it is egregious for the media to misrepresent it. Egregious, and ma…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:53 PM
3

It was Dr. Tara Palmatier and you can see her presentation here and decide for yourself if her speech has been misrepresented in the press and if so think about why. It's at 3:23 in the video. http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/dr-tara-palmatier-at-the-1st-international-conference-on-mens-issues-yesallwomen-nomra/
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:30 PM
-3

Prove you are on a jury. Otherwise you are a troll.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:04 PM
1

She is still not a blonde and not naughty and you didn't provide any other context for the drool you just slimed on us all.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:35 PM
2

Was this for your terrible terrible behavior in /r/NaughtyBlondes? I certainly did not appreciate your numerous spammings of that subreddit with Danica Patrick -- Not a blonde.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:16 PM
3

I think there are two issues The desires of many, including myself, to see AVFM "grow up" along many axes The responses to critics of the organization demanding financial transparency of a private organization and trying to use their right to privacy as a private organization as yet another cudgel against them.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:59 PM
7

I am a big critic of Paul Elam and AVFM's approach to many things, but this approach was on target, and his specific answer to Adam Serwer extremely polite, all things considered.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:57 PM
0

Step 1. Stop trolling Reddit
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:47 PM
6

What am I missing? Your link does not seem to confirm your headline, that unless men register for the draft, they cannot vote.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 12:04 AM
2

Huh? Srsly? Tosh 2.0? You're a pinhead.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:59 AM
2

I didn't come to your house to poop on your couch, but I felt the need to take a dump and didn't bother asking permission to enter. But I'm not here to start shit.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:58 AM
-1

"...we need to talk" ie you are here to start shit. If you weren't here to start shit, you would have listened, participated, and offered your experience, not told us we need to talk. Also, fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:56 AM
2

downvoted because OP somehow can't figure out Monica Hesse is a she not a he and OP's analysis just gets worse from there.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:28 AM
17

I think you did just fine. Most "wah I've been banned from /r/feminism" are completely ridiculous. Your's actually is right on target and makes an apt critique in a reasonable fashion.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:18 AM
1

I think you have me confused for someone a feminist who gives a shit about what some random redditor thinks about me If so, you'd be wrong on two counts. But you don't get that??
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:08 AM
1

I'm going with what is a lunatic for $400 Alex.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:07 AM
1

Apparently so. But even had those been her actual feelings, I am not going go full poutrage over it as OP wanted.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:15 PM
1

Thanks, It's interesting that was from a week ago, and yet of course, the way our idiot and internet media works, even yesterday I was seeing new posts about the original order.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:04 PM
0

Sorry, I always forget. Reddit :== serious business. Zis is REDDIT! We don't pffft here!
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:02 PM
0

Yet one Elliot Rodgers expressing his personal hate of women is a symptom of misogyny in all men. Wait, what? Where does this fit into your logic? Have I ever said that? No, I've said that all the evidence is that Elliot Rodger (no 's') was a deranged lunatic with no connection to the mens rights movement. Where does accuracy fit into your logic?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:08 AM
4

I can't stand bloggers who masquerade as reporters. She claims to quote Paul Elam but then says Elam pulled down the post. SO HOW DID SHE FIND THE QUOTE? She finds the quote and says Elam claims he was being satirical, but as a reporter WHY DIDN'T SHE DO THE FOLLOWUP TO SEE IF IT WAS REASONABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS QUOTE AS SATIRE? She may believe she is a reporter, but she is an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:45 AM
4

Upvoted because it's on PostSecret, and so must be ture.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:39 AM
0

Bro, I haven't abused anyone. I stated my opinion, this is not an issue that matters, and her fear is not representative of misandry. You dislike that opinion of mine, you do. While I have been respectful of you, you dismissed my "feels". But I understand, like so many other tumblr feminists, you are the victim here.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:25 AM
0

Oh quite done. Once it became clear you learned outrage and lingo at the knees of tumblr feminists I realized my mistake. I apologize for not liking what you like and for desiring this subreddit to focus on actual problems. And you personally have my sincerest sympathies.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:21 AM
0

Oh you poor dear! I made you resort to tumblr feminist lingo! I lose!
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:07 AM
-1

I think your outrage here is as misplaced as her fears and neither rises to the level of a link.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:58 AM
2

Oh it is, and I concur with your sentiments mostly, but I do like the word shiv, so uh, sorry. It was also intended to "rhyme" with the kind of knife Uhura was holding in the image.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:40 AM
3

I truly respect you AW, but literary deconstruction is the true enemy of civilization here.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:27 AM
3

Not sure about the land downunder but in the States, their message should be targeted at teenaged girls and young women. CDC: College-aged women are the largest binge drinkers in America By: Darris Pope | Staff Reporter Posted: February 5, 2013 See more at: http://georgiastatesignal.com/pour-up-drink/#sthash.uUyqtjy3.dpuf
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:25 AM
-2

One woman expressing her personal fear of men is not misandry. One man expressing his personal fear of women is not misogyny. It might be a sign she can be irrational, but there is no evidence in that one statement to believe she hates men, or her fear is driven by misandry, or that it exposes the misandry of women in general. It is her personal fear. /get a life and stop worrying about what other people think, worry about their behaviors.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:18 AM
3

Is this a Cathy Young article? Of course it's a Cathy Young article. We need a [Cathy Young] flair.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:15 AM
2

Won't this law eventually mean that almost every romantic movie made in Hollywood must be reclassified as "rape porn"? Far worse than that, so too must "Mirror, Mirror". http://i.imgur.com/bziq16l.jpg But come on, ever since "Baby It's Cold Outside" went over to the darkside, we've known this day would be coming. What's needed is a shiv placed firmly in the back of every professor teaching literary deconstruction.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:14 AM
1

Who cares? If that's what she feels, that's what she feels. Who cares?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:11 AM
20

I just don't trust her alone Uh, no offense, it sounds like she is saying something derogatory about your sister more than worrying about the roofer.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:35 PM
2

vehiculate ??
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:05 PM
3

Terrific post Pierce, but here: Put it this way, COTWA is allied with Brett Sokolow of NCHERM and RAINN on critical issues while the feminist blogosphere spirals ever more hostile to both due process and maleness. (Why don't you cite that particular post the next time you put one of my blogs on your hate list, Art?) Well, I think Sokolow and RAINN should be asked who they feel is more aligned with their positions, COTWA or feminism. I suspect they would consider themselves more aligned with femi…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:19 PM
1

Many of the speakers spoke about father's rights issues. Most fathers rights issues are actively opposed by feminists. The same feminists that claim to champion men and insist patriarchy hurts men too and say what men need is moar feminism. It seems difficult to tell the story of fathers and their travails in family court with mentioning the whale in the room. In other news, Adam Serwer's journalistic history suggests nothing less than Paul Elam cutting off his own head and handing said head to …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:07 PM
11

How do you import sperm from a broad?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:00 PM
3

You first zero day troll! What do you controversialo think of /r/whiterights!? I've never visited it, and clearly you have, so broseph my bro, what's up with dat?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:24 PM
1

How many different ways is screeching feminist violinist redundant? Countably finite to be sure, but still. /s
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:21 PM
2

Cathy Young of course.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:11 PM
5

Why are these allegations any more or less credible than those of Dylan Farrow? Why is this not considered as possibly as wrong as the McMartin scare? To answer my own question, there is substantially much more reason to believe Greyland's claims given the conviction of her step father (?) Walter Breen for child molestation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_H._Breen#Crimes
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:52 PM
5

I tend to agree. Michael Arrington of all people has the resources to make a clear problem clear and known to all. For him not to do this is a failure of his responsibility to society.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:54 PM
5

The downvotes have little to do with false accusations vs. rape, and everything to do with akaforty's misrepresentations of the OP's comment and akaforty's comments. For instance, regardless of akaforty's misrepresentations, no one has said rape isn't wrong. Is a false accusation worse than rape? Why do you insist on putting a partial ordering on it? Who here is putting a partial ordering on it? Do you not see the ramifications of some false accusations can be equally as bad if not far worse tha…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:51 PM
2

It's as simple as understanding they are lazy, mendacious, partisan assholes.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:26 AM
8

Their postings about men's rights are so off center and so biased it lends a great deal of credence to complaints the SPLC these days is all about fundraising.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:29 PM
5

I posted this unflattering but not particularly libelous comment at Goldwag's blog. It never made it out of moderation. http://i.imgur.com/ATjuVg5.jpg
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:27 PM
6

She wasn't hostile.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:14 PM
4

Why is there constant mention of women thinking all men are rapists? Google Schrodinger's Rapist. Google "Don't be that guy" Google rape culture
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:49 AM
4

Briefly, Your questions are not unreasonable, but you should understand that they are asked very frequently, and often asked by trolls trying not to learn about men's issues, but asked with a very "gotcha" attitude. I'm honestly too tired to take them on, but subscribe to the reddit, you'll find the answers to these and many more interesting questions. And discover the diversity of the people who post here.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:43 AM
1

That OJ dude, whad'ya think?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:57 PM
-1

She looks dazed and confused in this video. You respond to none of the in context complaints, you and yours cherrypick, and misrepresent. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:18 PM
2

Kelly Behre wrote a spectacularly stupid and logically incoherent article against fathers in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/06/13/fathers-rights-and-womens-equality/the-fathers-rights-movement-undermines-victims-of-domestic-violence The comments at the times took her apart, so did Robert Franklin of National Parents. And when I say spectacularly stupid and logically incoherent I mean that literally. It is a text book example of a lawyer pounding the table and defle…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:14 PM
0

It's kind of a big wall of text blog, so no, I don't want to see it, but considering how Elliot Rodger's actions have been projected onto the MRM, I think it's very much in our interests to understand what he wrote, why he wrote it, what people are saying about us, and figure out how to deal with that. It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if …
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:09 PM
1

I find it intriguing that Vice President Joe Biden is such a champion for the 1 in 5 clam. Now, as VP, I am sure he is far better briefed than most of us. So I give him that. Still, talk about older, whiter, mansplaining mansplainer. For all his corvette driving, Biden is 71 years old. Joe Biden is literally the face of Patriarchy and Chivalry.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:06 PM
1

I prefer "well, bye" just because you know, internet memes.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:03 PM
3

It's no skin off my nose, but um, what happened to the standard ok cupid starbucks date? I don't see how two months of conversations is much more informative. In other contexts, isn't that what "grooming" behavior is?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:01 PM
1

Go to college.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:59 PM
1

and just write their own opinions on them This is the part I truly DO NOT understand, given Raw Story's surprisingly good reputation, because that is exactly what they do most of the time. That's not reporting. That's blogging, and in fact, Scott Eric Kaufman, or as he is known on his blog as SEK, came from a blogging background. As did Dave Edwards. As did TBogg. There is no reporting going on. Not any of these folks will pick up a phone or conduct any sort of primary research. I often used to …
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:57 PM
15

I have to say I am actually shocked to see this article, as fairly written as it was in Raw Story not push back directly on Sommers fucking written by Scott Eric Kaufman, who has long been in the vangard of social justice, and has many times written accounts that plainly misrepresented the known facts The comments are pure Raw Story "progressive", "enlightened", "tolerant", "welcoming".
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:15 AM
1

Traveling today, but see "Title IX for Science" as an initiative from a few years back for gender quotas in faculty.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:03 AM
5

So this is a real men's issue dealing with our bodies, our health, our enjoyment of life, our psychological state, our happiness. Of course feminists and their friends would understand that and support men in need? Feminists would not compare medications to aid erectile dysfunction with abortifacients or birth control right? We know feminists believe sex is optional, they tell men all the time, the alternative to being bound to custody support for 18+ years is not to have sex with women. Well th…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:55 AM
1

Uh, last time I went in and mentioned um, someone I knew might be having these issues, next thing I knew I was given a prostate exam! It's not there doctor! (actually I was given a whole physical.)
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:42 AM
2

Yeah, that's the one without the magnetic attachment charge cable, you have to fist the cable right in there.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:04 PM
10

IANAL, but I'd say the trainer's response is in general wrong (should be obvious), but depending on the state you are in, could in specific cases be legal. I think our "right to access" can vary from state to state and can depend on the nature of divorce law and custody orders. So for instance, if a parent has no legal custody of a child at all, for whatever reason, I can agree it can be horrible not to be informed for the child's medical records, but I can't say a doctor's office is without mer…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:31 PM
5

you're right, thanks. I skipped right over that. My mistake.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:43 AM
-2

So why did you delete your post? I honestly never understand when anyone deletes a post (except for in the first minute or two when they realize it's got an an embarrassing typo right their in it and then delete it and repost it.) Why did you delete the prior post?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:22 AM
2

The problem is there is no comparison between the two people. Read his blog, Vacula is one of the nicest, most straightforward guys on the net. Read her blog, Sworn admits to having an agenda and admits this project is about her looking for shit and trying to stir shit up.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:57 AM
1

"Is it the first thing you would do?" is certainly an insult. As I said troll, fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:29 AM
3

A humor tag would be nice.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:09 AM
2

That look like that hurt, so not terribly funny.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:08 AM
2

Chris, not that I disbelieve you, but can you post more than an imgur link? blog post? twitter?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:06 AM
4

Google Justin Vacula. He is a young atheist activist. He has attended several feminist atheist conferences, like "Women in Secularism" and for the most part received sham fear of him, abuse, and false accusations from them. His behavior there has been entirely on the up and up. And yet, consistently misrepresented by most of the feminist blogosphere and feminist atheist networks. (He actually seems on the net like about the nicest most straight forward guy on the net, however, he does have a hor…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:29 AM
2

I've read her blog posts and her posts at reddit. She is not a good writer, I find she misrepresents the truth, and she has explicitly stated an agenda against AVFM and men's rights. Is that what you would do? This just seems like unnecessary antagonism. Have you seen how feminists labeled atheist Justin Vacula's behavior at the women's conferences he goes to?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:05 AM
3

They are small. I went to a conference a few years ago, and though small, they do good stuff. Due to their size and their mission, I'd love to see them get volunteer aid.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:14 AM
-2

Also, near as I can tell, the top upvoted comments from devotedpupa and flamingbearattack are from redditors who almost never post in MR and are much more often seen posting in other subreddits and critical of MR. But brigade? Doesn't seem likely.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:23 PM
1

It is pretty easy for you to document this, using freezepage.com or archive.is. Can you document this? If you can, I would agree that's pretty obnoxious for them to delete threads or replies JUST because they are downvoted and not for other salient reasons.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:18 PM
-2

Heh, a few days ago, (yesterday), I replied to some kid who came in here complaining his parents had grounded him for tossing his older sister into a lake after she hit him that he should run away and join the circus, or maybe join the army. I guess I am just way too fucking old, because it seems no one at either MR or AMR could figure out that telling a 15 year old kid to run away and join the circus or the army might be a bit of sarcasm based on what we are told kids used to do like 80 years a…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:15 PM
-20

The remarks concerning her change of shirt and her earrings go to apt critiques that in the past her videos all have the appearance of having been made on the same day. they repeat shots she is clothed the same she makes the same errors and shows the same poor research use clips taken (stolen) from other's websites. It is a criticism that she is not using the $160K as she claims, for ongoing development, and that the videos were made on the same day, canned and released over time. But you know t…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:02 PM
1

Thanks, as soon as I saw Cathy Young's name on the piece, I knew it would be a winner. (Cathy is claimed by some to be a known misandrist who is trying to stop the men's movement and make them wait for enlightened feminists to take up the cause. I've never seen any real evidence to that or seen those claims stand up to any amount of intellectual rigor by the honest.)
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:00 PM
2

I worry about google drive or google docs privacy issues. I am not confident that opening or reading such docs cannot result in a privacy leak.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:50 PM
2

Obviously, no matter what happens at the conference, tumblr will pretend it was testosterone-driven klan rally. I think it would be worse if it seemed like we were actively excluding feminists. What matters is building a positive image in the mainstream media, which can be held accountable for bullshit (no guarantee, of course) We'll disagree on this. I think it's better to exclude her because of specific posts she has written while encouraging all qualified feminist journalists to apply for pre…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:16 PM
5

the women attending has promised to act with respect, Okay so having read her comment here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2872gw/a_woman_whos_against_mens_rights_wants_to_attend/ci87j0x I don't actually see her saying what you interpret her to be saying. A strawman was set up that she would pull fire alarms and accuse people of rape, and she swears she won't do that. I believe her. Regardless, her posts at her blog and her reddit posts have me convinced she has no need for pulling …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:14 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:07 PM
2

If press get a hold of such shit, AVFM just sends them the full tape. Honestly, what good would that do? That's not how the press or viral media or propaganda or tumblr or feminist works. Do you recall that whole war in Iraq thing that happened a few years back? Did the dodgy dossier or any amount of truth keep that kerfuffle from going viral?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:04 PM
3

Sorry AW, in a very quick search I couldn't find that thread, may I ask you to link it? (My own reading of her blog and her reddit posts demonstrates to me she is disingenuous, or perhaps just clueless if she claims she will be polite or represent what she sees in any way objectively.)
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:03 PM
-6

She gains karma by stirring shit up. So she does what she can to provoke maximum outrage. Welcome AMR Thank you for brigading here using a non np link. Enjoy your stay and the anxiety of free speech here before retreating to the safe confines of your own subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:45 PM
4

She'll ask leading gotcha questions, and use her video camera and selective editing to find shit, create shit and stir shit up and then press coverage of the conference will be showing her footage repeatedly.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:32 PM
2

I am torn. In general I think letting feminists in to see the conference is a good thing, and I have suggested some names that I think would have been great to invite. The problem I have is that sworebytheprecious, in particular, has shown via her blog and reddit posts to be: a terrible writer tendentious completely unobjective and either intentionally willing to misrepresent OR hopelessly clueless If there had been some feminist journalists known at least for the desire to put journalism ahead …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:31 PM
3

I'd suggest http://isnaf.info/ ISNAF is a support network for those suffering the pain and bewilderment of losing a child due to the dynamics of parental alienation. https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org National Parents Organization,a charitable and educational,501 (c)(3), organization, is focused on promoting shared parenting, where both parents have equal standing raising children after a separation or divorce. National Parents Organization recognizes that preserving a strong bond betwe…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:24 PM
91

It's actually shocking how you can google stiletto heels murder https://www.google.com/search?q=stiletto%20heels%20murder And even after tossing out duplicates come up with pages and pages of stories of women killing men with their high heels. Seriously, if men were doing that to women with say, cowboy belt buckles, cowboy belt buckles would need to be registered and only sold after a background check.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:22 PM
-4

Update: A complete transcript can be found here: http://www.feministfrequency.com/2014/06/women-as-background-decoration-tropes-vs-women/ Yes, I did link. I think the internet is made of links, and I think silly notions that we can somehow deprive people of income or link juice is mainly just a silly pretentious piece of poutrage.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:07 PM
0

Given that it's YouTube, I do think it's reasonable to close off comments. But not to close off voting. But if you do close off comments, I also think it should almost be expected to link to a blog or other forum where the video can be discussed. She has posted a transcript here: http://www.feministfrequency.com/2014/06/women-as-background-decoration-tropes-vs-women/ And I have to commend her for doing so, regardless, there is no discussion there either.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:06 PM
-15

Yes, I agree, creepshaming an entire industry using cherry picked examples something we see that runs rampant throughout gaming tech college reddit Is certainly not a men's issue. Nor is that her prior discussions as well as this one will be picked up the mainstream press and social justice warriors to further their agendas like claims the internet is misogynist demanding soft content restrictions in tech demanding soft quotas in tech employment and gaming employment further describing our vast …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:57 PM
1

I really like the work of the National Parents Organization. You can subscribe to their blog feed: https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:52 PM
1

Nice font, dude, what is that 3 point Helvetica Sharp Eyesightia?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:51 PM
3

Ya know, too much link spam gives reddit indigestion and it often results in various forms of banning. If you gaze into reddit, sometimes, reddit gazes into you.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:48 PM
3

For me, Father's Rights - Enforcement of Parenting Time, Recognition of Parental Alienation Reform of family law and family court and domestic violence industry Reform of "rape culture" mythology in college, tech, and popular press
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:46 PM
1

Google shows he's been raping journalism for 20 years....
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:34 PM
2

Sadly, I don't think that's true, though it should be.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:34 PM
1

Sigh, some nights on Craigslist, I've gone hunting for mammoths.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:33 PM
4

From the National Parents Organization Blog, April 30, https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/21691-warshak-paper-may-influence-child-custody-decisions-in-australia links us to http://www.smh.com.au/national/about-us/movement-on-fathers-overnight-access-20140428-zr0z2.html Barriers constraining divorced fathers having their young children stay with them overnight may be lifted, with key family law organisations revising policies blocking overnight care of infants and toddlers. The reth…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:20 PM
3

You were raised by an awesome single father who fought tooth and nail to gain custody and who taught you to be the strong awesome woman you are ... and you became not just a feminist but a radical feminist? Well, happy father's day.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:51 PM
1

I'm not going to go back and reread her crapola to find the 9th bullet, but yes, you are absolutely correct in your other points here. And yes, I am butthurt how feminists took a perfectly legitimate concept from anth and raped it 180 degrees for their propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:47 PM
2

Well, I will agree with him on one thing, which is that I completely don't understand why anyone would make a youtube rant more than 5 minutes in length and expect anyone to watch it. It is certainly not just MRA stuff, but it certainly is MRA stuff too. And these 10, 15, 1 hour videos certainly don't seem to fit the normal viewing/listening pattern of most users so creating long videos filters out so much of our hoped for audience which wants short, sharp, focused pieces with good production va…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:38 PM
2

Hmm. I am going to have call shenanigans. That essay you link to is from 1988. As an anthropology minor in the late 70s, privilege was an anthropological term used to describe the relative advantages and disadvantages of groups. It was never intended, as I was taught to be judgmental. Anthropologists (of the time) took special care not to place ethnocentric judgments to compare one culture to another. "Privilege" was stolen and stripped of its meaning by feminists to be a way to judge individual…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:21 AM
3

https://www.google.com/search?q=RITA+PANAHI+feminism Yeah, she's not a feminist, ...
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:15 AM
6

Misleading title, given that a search of the author and feminism reveals her to be, if anything, in disagreement with feminism: https://www.google.com/search?q=RITA+PANAHI+feminism THE violent student protests around the country have highlighted not just the entitled mentality of those protesting but also the duplicitous hypocrisy of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:12 AM
2

Privilege is a bullshit notion that comes from a horrifically written paper in the 1970s by someone who thought that there weren't any black musicians that got famous making music. Wow. Can you please expand on this?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:51 AM
1

Feminists claim they don't want chivalry chivalry is patriarchal they don't need protection they are as able as men Then they say things like: Urwin is not concerned by that. "There's a reason people love Jane Austen novels," she says. Any of her characters would never dream of lunging in for a kiss without establishing with a high degree of certainty that it would be welcomed. And yes, I suspect a survey of women would demonstrate that women, like any person in a relationship, do not want a par…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:32 AM
0

Exsqueeze me? You come into a sub you have never contributed to before, you spout off like an expert on human reproduction when you are a mere student, you act like an arrogant jackass and you accuse me of trolling? Your whole post is a troll Dr. Dipshit, and instead of being offended by me, 3rd year, if you weren't such a pretentious twat hiding your own insecurities, you would have seen my first post was a small attempt at humor that actually made your comment count greater than zero and so di…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:09 AM
0

I have to say, in this day of Photoshop, and knowing what happened to the Memento meme, http://i.imgur.com/mDX4K2a.jpg, the "I need femism posters" are http://i.imgur.com/y1ubqlJ.jpg freaking begging to be raped easily exploited, and we need to be on guard for that.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:42 AM
2

Where is Al Sleet, the hippy dippy weatherman, to give us the troll weather report?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:39 AM
1

Ya know what they call the kid who graduates at the bottom of his class in med school? You are still a med student, and already you sound like a zillion doctors peddling their quack cures on late night tv and websites. (You are clearly an arrogant fuck, so I assume you're going into surgery.) (But you are an ignoramous too, so your speciality might be psychiatry or vaginoplasty.) If you don't want to sound like a quack, stop quacking.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:07 AM
2

Hi guys, I am a medical student and Frankenstein is one of my favorite movies. I love experimenting on people. One day, I shall graduate. Ron Weasley
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:36 AM
2

You're a little scary sometimes, you know that?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:21 AM
2

The purpose and effect of Statutes of Limitation is to protect defendants. There are three reasons that support the existence of Statutes of Limitation, namely: (a) that a plaintiff with good causes of actions should pursue them with reasonable diligence; (b) that a defendant might have lost evidence to disprove a stale claim; and (c) that long dormant claims have more cruelty than justice in them (Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th edition). The general rule is that the limitation period begins wh…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:46 PM
7

Given a choice between outrage and humor, I try to pick humor.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:16 PM
10

Yeah, I thought it was pretty funny.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:15 PM
1

Well, I certainly think the step-father has an extra burden in addition to their mother in reminding the kids who I am and to respect me. So yes, he certainly shoulders much of the responsibility. But I do think the majority is on the ex. I am mostly saying that in the context of young kids and having a younger sibling especially, I can understand young kids calling a step parent mom or dad and not calling them by their first name. Similarly their mom and step father should insist they call me b…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:05 PM
1

It does suck, and "letting it go" even though the right decision, is pernicious, as it just encourages the behavior and makes for even more nickel and diming of the agreement. At least that was my experience. Every time I didn't push back and every time the court did nothing tangible, just meant two dozen more occurrences of the same nonsense and worse.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:58 PM
1

Hmm, I'd go for the circus myself.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:45 PM
3

I want to agree with you, but I think it's more complicated than you make out. Any parent who has primary custody and encourages or suggests that their kids call a partner/step parent dad or mom is terrible person. In descending order I hate my kids won't call me dad my kids call their step father dad the word "step father" itself. I don't hate the concept. I hate the fucking word. Now, I hate that my two daughters and I were separated when they were about 7 & 9, but even when their "step-father…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:43 PM
6

You're right, and it sounds as though you've been through it, because to meaningfully fight them is a couple of thousand dollars in attorney fees, 4 months to get a hearing at the earliest, all sorts of ugly accusations and back accusations in the court motions and then sort of a sheepish feeling along with the rightful anger that you are asking a judge to hear a dispute over not returning kids on time. And then knowing the judge won't actually read or care about any of that shit.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:37 PM
2

Run away and join the circus the army
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:29 PM
8

But don't worry about the mother. If the father ever refused to give the children back, the police would be all to eager to arrest him immediately for kidnapping. Just to clarify for the stalkers who will take this out of context, I gather what you are saying is: The mother can and will interfere with, frustrate and out and out refuse to allow the father his court ordered parenting time, an act which should be seen as parental kidnapping (but won't be), but will instead be handled by the police …
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:10 PM
8

The judge will not help. "It is an enforcement issue. Contact law enforcement." I don't know if that's accurate, at least in my state. More like: The judge will not help but will reschedule hearings, accept delays, order various forms of court supported evaluations and therapy and never get around to actually doing anything apart from racking up lawyer and psychologist fees while the children are still young and being poisoned.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:57 PM
5

Well, me for one.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:55 PM
32

You could always ask your feminist friends to stop doing it then. Killer.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:53 PM
0

I'm not trying to cause trouble, but it's actually not clear to me from reddit's insane rules that we can post a video where a redditor doxes herself. http://www.reddit.com/rules NOT OK: Posting the full name, employer, or other real-life details of another redditor
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:30 PM
4

She's sort of a known internet crank, AMR actually took votes asking whether to ban her, and I think other feminist groups too have recognized her nuttiness.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:58 PM
3

A nice to the point letter.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:00 PM
3

It is almost as crazy as Elliot Rodgers writings Arguably, her rant is more crazy than the Unabombers manifesto, which many many people of all stripes regarded as regrettably close to to the truth
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:24 PM
1

Is there any evidence George Will's position is actually in trouble? As a journalist/pundit, he should have the backing of his WAPO editor for his speech so long as it doesn't violate typical journalistic norms As a click whoring website, the WAPO is certainly loving this
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:19 PM
2

Fuck off zero day troll.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:26 AM
0

I see a family that is probably normally happy, and normally dealing with the stresses of a world, job(s), kid, rent, and I see nothing wrong with a sink filled with dishes or a less than spic and span house.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:21 PM
7

None of this bullshit about consent matters. California and other states have a zero second rape law. http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/17/findlaw.analysis.colb.rape/ Giving consent is almost entirely meaningless. If Kai asks Morgan every 30 seconds if Morgan consents, that leaves 29 seconds when under California law, Kai could easily be a rapist. WHAT needs to be clear and explicit is withdrawal of consent. Once initial consent has been given, the person withdrawing must be educated to make a clea…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:18 PM
3

Spiked seems to be the anti- Vice. (Vice seems to be a slightly more hipster Cracked).
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:05 PM
2

Thank you bitch.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:24 PM
2

You can consider it as part of Queen Bees and Wannabes. Hold on a second, I'm summoning my bitch now to fill in the details. It's part of a long chain of well known but easily forgotten evidence that bullying, domestic violence, internet trolling, street violence, etc., comes from a very diverse group. Not just men. Not just women. It's part of the pussy pass we forget this, and in courtrooms male judges do seem to forget this more often then women judges who, if I believe Judge Judy videos, und…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:23 PM
1

I bet dinner was not ready, homework had not been looked over and the house was a mess with the laundry on the floor. I hope IQ was conserved in your family tree, because that means some of your brothers or sisters might have what you are missing.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:12 PM
2

I can understand taping this video in expectations of something different having happened, but who would then upload such a video? That's not a mens rights / feminism thing, it's just a sad commentary on who we are in 2014 that after such a disaster we upload these things. Nevertheless OP, I disagree very much with the implications of your headline. In a marriage shit happens. Some good shit, some bad shit. This video says nothing as to whether men or women should get married.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:10 PM
4

That's some list. I'd so love to see a well produced, well known, website that could organize our various arguments including such lists.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:54 PM
1

My ex-wife used to lay on the shower floor for hours when she got her period. Seemed pretty disabling.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:48 PM
1

I think she'd make an interesting contrast to the other two. I could see Laci Green, but sadly, I see no reason to believe Valenti has the reportorial chops to deal with the material, and Marcotte is an ideologue and known liar virulently opposed to men's issues. Neither would be good fits, they would probably be disruptive, and walk away framing the whole thing as silly men, and patriarchy hurts men too.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:43 PM
1

Could you post some images to provide evidence your question was banned from other reddits? FWIW, it's probably not fair to pay any person when they are reading personal email, redditing, over at the water cooler, taking a dump, texting, snacking, worrying about their child's grades, visiting websites on their phone when they are on duty or waiting for some process to finish. making personal phone calls, sneaking out for personal shopping, picking their nose, etc. Please post some proof that you…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:33 PM
1

It's probably not fair to pay a woman the same as her male colleagues during times when she's less effective, or less productive. It's probably not fair to pay any person when they are reading personal email, redditing, over at the water cooler, taking a dump, texting, snacking, worrying about their child's grades, ....
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:30 PM
9

Cathy Young is a wonderful journalist, investigative reporter and analyst. Her columns are always factual, enlightening and insightful, regardless of the topic she is writing about.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:27 PM
1

I dunno. What sources do you read?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:26 PM
1

I think these would be great people to invite, and they would contribute greatly to the proceedings and they should be invited (except of course AVFM is still mistakenly hating on Cathy Young and printing vicious things about her), but as they have been excommunicated by Modern Feminists, their write ups would not help fix the problem I would like to see addressed, which is how Modern Feminists view Fathers Rights issues. As they have been excommunicated by Modern Feminists, their views would si…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:27 PM
2

I so much want to downvote you for not taking my very serious question very seriously, but your logic is impeccable, so I am forced to upvote you. (It was Solanas, not Solanus).
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:25 PM
1

I disagree with Bazelon and Rosin on many feminist issues and at other times find them interesting, and with Bazelon, enlightening with regards to legal issues. I believe Bazelon at least is honorable and her aim is good and fair journalism, and high quality punditry and analysis. So I think it would be interesting to open up the conference to them, invite them in, be transparent, and then the outcome could include Bazelon and Rosin and Faludi actually pushing back against Marcotte and others. A…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:42 AM
3

I respect that you have been following Sokolow for far longer than I, so I will file 98% of my cynicism away and take you at your word....
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:40 AM
1

You didn't like how your boyfriend is in bed, so instead of talking to him about it, you cheated on him, and then you blamed him for his cheating. http://i.imgur.com/yNua2HR.jpg You are Princess Cuntface.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:33 AM
0

Why are you making fun of mental illness? http://i.imgur.com/GEWIrkM.jpg Your mother is a whore.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:23 AM
1

Why do you abuse Argentinians? http://i.imgur.com/TTo0ESV.jpg You are a fuckface and a cunt.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:22 AM
1

Why do you abuse fat people? http://i.imgur.com/jZqxuED.jpg http://i.imgur.com/VJsI3i1.jpg Stop being a troll. And a cunt. Also, fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:20 AM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:16 AM
6

I did enjoy that, and it gets better too. Over at David Futrelle's museum of journalistic horrors, after covering feminists trying to shut the conference down, when AVFM moves the conference venue, Futrelle starts spreading rumors that it is all part of some scam from Elam to defraud people. The sad part is these assholes will be quoted over and over and that is how the image will spread. And Futrelle, who never met a fact he couldn't misrepresent, is one of the more honest folk in the feminist …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:34 AM
7

Pierce, pardon my cynicism, but I'll wait for the long term before deciding. So far Sokolow seems like a typical ambulance chaser mashed up with an arms dealer selling his services to all sides, doing what he can to gin up outrage and thus demand for his services from everyone. I'd like to survey divorce lawyers, see how many of them argue parental alienation one week and the next week argue there is no such thing. So there is Sokolow, demanding for years that colleges pay attention to Title IX …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:30 AM
7

It would be good if we could use this thread to discuss ways to make the conference as successful as possible. Our subreddit has many members, each with something to contribute. The program speakers are excellent especially as it concerns fathers rights would it be good to give out student discounts at nearby law schools? And invite the local ABA heads? invite local council members? Michigan state senators? President of U Mich? heads of local NPR affiliates local leading journalists Invite these…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:18 PM
1

Who appointed you chief cunt of the joke police, and what are your standards going to be? Which jokes will you outlaw, and why, and what punishments will you lay out when someone inadvertently snickers at a fart from a fat old woman who ate too much cheese that morning? no jokes about mental illness only feminist approved jokes about rape no off color jokes jokes about old white guys okay and encouraged no jokes about bumbling husbands jokes about how men mansplain okay jokes about mras whining …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:07 PM
2

If you don't link, or don't include an image, I am not going to outrage with you, I'll probably hope you grow up and past such trivialities.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:06 PM
-1

What a stupid fucking cunt you are. I'm not mocking people with mental illness. I'm mocking trigger warnings which feminists use for attention whoring and claim victimization status. I'm mocking twitter feminists like Melody Hensley who claimed twitter gave her PTSD and yet she couldn't just turn off the computer. I'm mocking feminist bloggers and feminsit commenters who demand trigger warnings as at shakespeare's sister for every blog post that they say could trigger their PTSD. Basically femin…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:47 PM
1

My father took childhood education classes via extension when he was working, took early retirement, then went to work at a daycare. The kids and the school loved him. But that was back before Feminists hyped stranger danger and Feminists hyped the McMartin preschool scare. http://www.counterpunch.org/1999/10/26/katha-s-silence/ So much for feminists wishing to tear down gender roles and gender barriers and so much for feminists saying men need more feminism and so much for feminists saying patr…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:08 PM
1

I appreciate your words Zero day. May I ask how much time you've spent reading this forum, or reading other men's and father's issues forums?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:04 PM
3

Gah!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:26 PM
1

If you pay attention to the abyss, the abyss will pay attention to you.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:59 PM
39

A woman gets an anonymous nasty tweet and it comes from MRAs. Elliot Rodger against any evidence at all, is an MRA. Death threats are made against the hotel hosting the AVFM conference, and suddenly David Futrelle is the responsible fact checking journalist, cautioning us, "Where they came from we don't know."
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:26 PM
12

Gah! I've been triggered! No trigger warning on a David Futrelle link! PTSD for me!!! WELCOME AMR Always good to see the vacuous moronic cunts of AMR on an active brigade campaign. http://np.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/27xftn/mras_mock_people_with_ptsd/ But tell Aerik he shouldn't dox people? http://np.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/27y25v/mras_drop_my_photo_on_detroit_paper_comment/ Nope, AMR loves doxing.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:24 PM
10

Yeah, of course when feminists receive nasty anonymous tweets, they run to the police and demand every rag on the net print up how they are being oppressed and stalked and threatened by creepers or MRAs.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:02 PM
3

Most Feminist Bake Sales sell their brownies for a dollar or two. The SCA Feminist Bake Sale is selling their brownie for $99. http://i.imgur.com/7kI9QNB.jpg
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:05 PM
7

It's worse than a mere rote sexism and racism. The only justification I can see is some income differential that makes white males more able to afford $99 than women or male minorities. That ignores how successful many women and male minorites are in terms of employment, and how many white males are impoverished themselves. And it sends the message that SCA believes minority men and all women can't get jobs that pay enough to afford their conference. It diminishes minority men and all women in t…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:01 PM
5

Dawkins likes twitter. It might be interesting to alert him via twitter and ask him his thoughts.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:58 PM
3

I'll lazily leave this here and wait for my bitch, wikibot, to fill in the details, yo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Bees_and_Wannabes
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:46 PM
6

On his interview a day or two before he was also describing elliptically troubles with the hotel and possible plans to move the conference. I hope it goes on in some fashion, the speakers they brought in were top notch.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:39 PM
25

Chris, I appreciate your linking to this article, but I just want to encourage people to submit their links with headlines that describe what the link is about.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:38 PM
3

One of the stranger claims I can't comprehend from David Futrelle is the somehow offense that Elam might be paying himself a salary, or paying personal expenses with AVFM money, and yet, corporate status wise, AVFM IS Elam, and it's clearly a full time job, and so what corporation, profit or non-profit doesn't pay it's staff to the best of its ability? Worse, I am pretty sure Futrelle has claimed AVFM only pulls in $75K a year. So, it can't even be said that Elam is ripping folks off to enrich h…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:01 PM
5

I'm 5'8", I don't work out, I have health issues. When I walk around late at night, I am fearful of others, including women. Not overly fearful. But I am cautious and try to remain aware of my surroundings and stay away from the nearby park after the lights go out. I recognize I live in a mostly safe neighborhood and these are my fears. I also recognize I have alternatives to walking around late at night, or walking around late at night with headphones on unaware of my surroundings. I don't ask …
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:52 PM
2

I have to remark she has an adorable belly button, for realz, and I am pinching her tummy as we speak. http://i.imgur.com/QJlJDoE.jpg
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:02 PM
3

My interpretation is they are talking about domestic violence which they think MRAs want free reign to inflict on women. But of course, coming from academia they couldn't say it plainly, and had to put it on a sign stated so only "fellow [gender studies] travelers" would understand it. And speaking of fellow travelers and gender studies, and I say this as someone who is mostly left myself, the anti-capitalist guy is just a typical fellow traveler there to remind us implicitly that there truly is…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:58 PM
21

Feminism is for everyone, but men need to STFU and just listen. FEMINISM IS FOR EVERYONE AND WHAT MEN NEED IS MOAR FEMINISM and let me tell you about the evil mansplaining I am oppressed with. Just STFU. I am talking.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:09 AM
1

I am a frequent critic of AVFM, but I thought Dean Esmay did a very good job here. Practice does make perfect, and it's clear he had the least amount of practice of any of them, including the prof whose job is to daily get up in front of an audience and speak. Esmay in particular did a very good job of letting others speak and not flying off the handle as I might very well have done. It would certainly not hurt, Dean, if you plan on doing more of these, to consider practicing with a coach in fro…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:36 AM
2

Kudos to AVFM. As the feminist said on the Detroit News, there is nothing wrong with the conference program itself. It's the idea of a men's movement she hates.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:08 AM
5

Wow. Nice catch. I assume her next act was to resign as editor.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:01 AM
1

Sorry for the repeat: Google Catharine MacKinnon, radical feminist, and acknowledged one of the most influential law professors of the 20th Century. The Title IX tribunals of the Obama Administration are a direct outcome of this radical feminist's leadership.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:25 PM
1

Google Catharine MacKinnon, radical feminist, and acknowledged one of the most influential law professors of the 20th Century. The Title IX tribunals of the Obama Administration are a direct outcome of this radical feminist's leadership.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:24 PM
2

The cartoon you post is an attack on men. The first panel summarizes the feminist viewpoint that women should be able to wear anything they like anytime they want, including skimpy clothes, yoga pants, lots of cleavage, etc., in schools. It is an argument claiming there is no such thing as inappropriate dress. That young women should be able to wear anything they want at school with no dress codes and that if that distracts young men, that is the young men's problems. That's not a panel supporti…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:19 PM
7

I'd say it depends on the magazine. If it's a magazine known for debates within a topic, sure. But this is a magazine known for its full throated support of feminism, not known for debates within feminism. I'd say it speaks with a very definite editorial voice. And further, just look to feminism itself. Feminism claims to be an academic philosophy. And yet, what sort of philosophy is it if outsiders, with a reasonable education in the philosophy, cannot use the principles of the philosophy to pr…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:01 PM
1

Seriously, I'd have like a $300 dollar a day habit. Probably wind up in jail for robberies to support my Japanese one time sex toy habit. No way I'm touching that stuff!
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:10 PM
6

I identify as a feminist, and I don't think male sexuality is bad. Nor, I think, do most feminists, especially third-wave feminists which is the current wave. Thank you for the canonical feminist response. Now, who should I believe? You or my lying eyes? http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004020.html http://www.metacafe.com/watch/an-EAuKJtJbmhtun/duck_soup_1933_marx_doubles_part_2/ Oh, there you are. Here's the combination. Is that clear? Is there anything else you want to know?…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:35 PM
36

If Jezebel were just a group blog your point would be stronger, but Jezebel is not just a group blog but a magazine with an editorial point of view. As such, what its writers post are edited and published not by the writer but by Jezebel itself, and problems like OP points out can be rightfully traced back and placed on Jezebel.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:30 PM
2

She flat-out said that a women's movement was necessary, but a men's movement is unhelpful. Give me a quote. It's easy to do. Show me the sentence or paragraph. Further saying that men have to wait until an egalitarian movement develops. Edited to insert I don't believe she has said men need to wait. And You have shifted the goalposts. Your claim is She demands that we give up activism and wait around for the egalitarian feminists to come out of the woodwork. (Ignore this line it's just for redd…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:02 PM
2

You said you Lobstermansunion's claim is a reasonable extrapolation of her writing. So make your own argument supporting that. Quote the specific sentences, the specific paragraphs, and give me your interpretation of them that supports Lobstermansunion claim she demands that we give up activism and wait around for the egalitarian feminists to come out of the woodwork. You literally haven't made a single argument yet except that you agree with what other people tell you. But that is not an argume…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:53 PM
3

The article has been grossly taken out of context by AVFM who she did, and on good solid ground criticize, using criticisms commonly found here in this very subreddit by supporters of men's rights who are also critical of AVFM as am I. I understand where the controversy stems from, nevertheless, point out any sentence or paragraph in the article where she makes the point Lobstermansunion claims: demand that we give up activism and wait around for the egalitarian feminists to come out of the wood…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:45 PM
1

Please be specific. Where exactly does she demand that we give up activism and wait around for the egalitarian feminists to come out of the woodwork.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:27 PM
2

Well, I encourage you to back that up, because in the 20 years I know of her writing, I have yet to read anything like that from her, or anything close to your statement. She has been far and away the most stable, the most well written, and the most clearly thought out commenter for men's rights I have come across.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:35 PM
4

Cathy Young is awesome.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:27 PM
9

Glenn Sacks used to reference her: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aglennsacks.com%20karen%20decrow I would certainly hope her recent passing and her history is mentioned by leading Men's Rights groups, if not mentioned at the AVFM conference which focused on many issues she would be in support of.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:27 PM
6

I hadn't realized she just passed away. Thanks for posting this.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:26 PM
1

Division is the whole philosophy behind divide by zero. Still, division is often very helpful.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:45 PM
1

I knew a woman who in the 30s was an Olympic swimmer. In the 40s, she was flying 25 different types of aircraft across the US from manufacturers to Nova Scotia to be ferried across to soldiers. I don't think you actually understand what women in the 30s, 40s, and 50s were doing. In the sixties she formed a flight school was teaching women to become airline pilots. She taught at least one future astronaut how to fly small planes. In the 80s, this person voted and supported Ronald Reagan. That for…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:40 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou6830u-k5I
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:38 PM
1

Yeah I get your message where you have repeated told me to fuck off and otherwise called me names, well it's Friday, have a beer or two dude, cool off, relax, then eat a shotgun.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:54 PM
0

Zero day account comes in and tells us we are doing it all wrong and zero day account has a better approach. That's classic concern troll behavior. It is what it is. He can get bent out of shape about it, but that IS how the internet will interpret him. I am very sympathetic to his views and have stated that throughout the thread, but regardless, zero day accounts are zero day accounts. And um, Paul Elam aside, it's people in the group like you who go around cursing others out, that makes it unw…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:56 PM
-1

Given my link karma, such as it is, is 4K and yours is 80, I'd say it's clear who is contributing. Anyway, when you get off the rag, come on back, and we can talk. Rag days are hard days for everyone.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:53 PM
1

I hope John Doe wins big. Close Occidental the fuck down. Hitting this fascists in the wallet is the only way they can learn. Better, an enormous payout to Doe might finally get the attention of their most famous alum. David Futrelle is twitter buddies with Professor Dirks, and she comments at his blawg. I look forward to reading Futrelle's analysis of his feminist buddy's advice.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:41 AM
0

I would say it was AW who labeled him a concern troll when AW wrote: your concern is noted Today though, I guess I am labeling you as OTR, maybe Perpetual OTR.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:20 AM
4

I have been accused of being a concern troll many times.. I know I am not. I give OP the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:13 AM
4

But I guess I'm a troll just because I used a new account to do it. Yes, that's correct. That's not a statement about who you are in real life. That's not in fact a statement about why throwaways are used in general. But zero day throwaways are used an awful lot to troll, and your question certainly looks like a classic concern troll.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:11 AM
4

The problem is you are using a zero day account. So regardless of your real life behaviors, today's "I am an egalitarian and I think Elam sucks balls" is exactly the behavior one would predict of a concern troll.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:56 PM
3

I do agree OP is a concern troll, but that said, I think it's a terrible play for Paul to claim to the MSM he is some sort of moderate. His writings are there for everyone to see, and yes, even when Futrelle cherry picks the worse of them, regardless, the cherry picking and the intentional misinterpretations aside were to be predicted, and expected. If Elam thinks MRM needs good cop, bad cop actors, he should have chosen one role, and gone on to create the other role for someone else. But playin…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:24 PM
5

He may be right that MRAs need some form of badass to get attention. The problem is that Elam does things that are not badass, just simply bad, and then he pretends to be the good guy. If he wants to play the bad guy, fine. If he wants to play the good guy, fine. But it is a terrible idea for Elam to play the bad guy and then claim to be the good guy. There are several people like that at AVFM and it is terrible for the entire movement. I can believe they are sincere. But I cannot endorse their …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:21 PM
1

Thanks, that was my most interesting read this morning. Scary stuff. Sad as well.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:23 PM
2

I understand, ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKdocYeSqTA
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:14 AM
0

No, it is expected. David treads the line carefully and his career is claimed to be as a responsible journalist. So he will say what he needs to say but no more than that.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:00 AM
6

Dear /u/notnotnotfred please change your twitter bot message to Feminism #Mostly comes out as #Hate #Mostly
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:22 AM
1

Oh hell, I downvoted just now because "s/men/people/" is a well known and discussed and documented trope in journalistic accounts and is a legitimate issue to raise in terms of the disposable male.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:13 AM
2

Yeah, I can understand that.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:28 AM
1

sigh. goodbye. enjoy your weekend. have fun.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:04 AM
1

The ugly speech here was assholes making anti-semitic remarks. Anti-semitic yes, but here at least, non-violent. I was referring to your complaint about JtO and AVFM.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:53 AM
1

You love violence. You prefer violence to debate, violence to speech. You are part of the problem, not part of the solution. Your own statements disqualify you from commenting on the supposed violent nature of others. You don't even know to be embarrassed by what you write. And we find you posting in the social justice league AMR reddit thus demonstrating that navel lint is more self-reflective and insightful than many AMR posters.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:21 AM
1

I was not being facetious about advocating violence against fascists. I am 100% for it. They espouse violence against innocent people, and would carry it out given the chance. So I approve of preventing them from vetting the chance. And I don't give a fuck about the aclu. Sometimes they do great stuff, sometimes they don't. Well there ya go.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:06 AM
1

Did you ever hear of the ACLU facetious dude? Cause, lulz, my take is right out of their playbook. https://www.google.com/search?q=aclu%20ugly%20speech Also, you advocated violence, then you claimed you were being facetious and I was too stupid not to figure it out. Fuck me, but I've heard Paul Elam and JtO say the same stupid shit. Total dipshit, that's what you are.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:44 PM
1

uh, I didn't. It seems like someone is infringing on my precious free speech! Lulz, you cry when the mods take the action you demanded. and idgaf if you "criticized" JtO; I can't take a group that willingly associates itself with AVFM seriously. They're toxic and reactionary. That's cool, I can't take seriously a tool who advocates violence with a bat in the face to deal with ugly speech.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:38 PM
1

Hey, I'm just curious /u/ihateusernamesalot, why did you delete the post in which you, an amr poster, was caught advocating violence: http://i.imgur.com/ZMBhzy1.jpg And if you were a better stalker, you would see I roundly criticized JtO for his old post about looking the other way. Which as I noted, was almost something I know JtO would not do in real life. You on the other hand, now we have seen you: once advocating violence remove that post because of your fear of downvotes come back and advo…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:39 PM
1

My feeling is that if there is a link submitted that has zero to do with men's rights, or is BS for whatever reason, I will protest it in the thread downvote the link report it in /r/mensrightsmeta and let the mods decide If there is a comment posted that is crap, I will pretty much do the same I tend to find that pointing out BS sometimes receiving a dismaying number of downvotes and more often starts a group of people confirming the nonsense of the link or comment and so will be downvoted unti…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:33 PM
2

Feminists often like to bat MRAs in the face. This week the AVFM conference in Detroit has been threatened by feminists with death threats and bats in the face.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:26 PM
2

When you see bigotry on forums, you should reply to it and note it. Downvote it. As a Jew, I am often told there is no anti-semitism. I find anti-semitic remarks on forums deplorable of course, but "valuable" in demonstrating otherwise. Vote. If you think something contributes to conversation, upvote it. If you think it does not contribute to the subreddit it is posted in or is off-topic in a particular community, downvote it. On the other hand, I've had my comments deleted and been banned from …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:21 PM
2

I certainly fill in the "white" box, but I've never quite felt part of "white" society no bacon constantly pressed in school why my family did not have a Christmas tree told in school the Jews killed Christ various forms of anti-semitism in school ("Hitler was right...") when my grandparents were escaping Germany, they had to reside in Mexico for a year because of quotas against Jewish immigration in the 20s had to take days off of school for important Jewish Holidays when most kids had school h…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:26 PM
3

Unlike feminist safe spaces, many MRM places put a value on freedom of expression and feel that allowing ugly speech supports freedom of expression in general supports your own freedom of expression when others consider it hate speech and want to censor it allows the person making the ugly speech to be known makes clear such ugliness exists best allows the ugly speech to be refuted The answer to ugly speech is more speech.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:14 PM
1

Googling Daily Stormer seems to indicate it's not a satire. https://www.google.com/search?q=daily+stormer http://www.vocativ.com/usa/race/man-bringing-back-nazi-movement-america/ http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/12/defending-putin-s-propagandists.html
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:29 AM
2

At first I figured cops were going to be $100 an hour, but I found two websites showing more like $50 per hour. Still seems hellacious and maybe insurmountable and most likely, almost certainly, wasted money.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:56 AM
3

You bring up a good point, which is that AVFM should require the hotel make a formal police complaint, and possibly file a complaint with the FBI as well. This is basically a threat of domestic terrorism.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:11 AM
2

It's not clear they can do that in the remaining time. Since they want Detroit Cops, my guess is $XXX is at least $50, which would be $25K, and isn't it 4 days, not 3 days? (that's about the rate seen here: http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/Police/about/usb/Special_Events_Unit/Officer)
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:06 AM
5

I think you may be right on the first count, though note, the protest against radfem was based on radfem's own admitted bigotry while this protest is based on death threats. Yeah, security and the insurance bond sounds expensive.... We'll see what happens.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:56 AM
3

And it would seem to be especially helpful to go in a gallery of feminist stopping speech with death threats, false fire alarms, shouting, etc. The more they do that, they more their cries of victim and rape culture are seen as hollow.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:05 AM
3

My guess is that they do and they don't. So for instance my guess is that internet feminists discussing diversity at google or stanford will probably agree with studies that include asians as white.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:02 AM
3

Those are some pretty awesome responses dude!
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:43 PM
5

A related but far more interesting piece is here: www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/29/how-the-asians-became-white/ Which deals with how asians are often counted as white when discussing diversity, in part perhaps because to count asians as non-white would skew various arguments. It's not necessarily a men's rights issue that, but it does deal with often made up self-serving statistics used in various diversity issues, including male vs. female gender issues.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:35 PM
8

I've seen one mainstream article about this conference. The article was long on Paul Elam's various history, and very short about the specifics of the conference itself, which last time I checked had a great deal of content from internationally known journalists a politician And if anything seemed focused on father's rights. Controversial, but hardly earth shattering. The PDF linked in the article is perhaps the best proof I have seen that modern day feminist forces are still making credible thr…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:30 PM
8

I think the image makes a reasonable point, but I don't believe there is any evidence Rodger is Jewish. Not even the Nazi over at daily stormer thinks Rodger is Jewish http://www.dailystormer.com/correction-elliot-rodger-might-not-be-jew/ The only evidence the Nazi at daily stormer can find that Rodger is Jewish is that his grandfather took pictures of the concentration camps involved in the "Holohoax". So all in all this is a shit image.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:00 PM
2

That was similar to my take. I also thought a psychologist and/or marriage counselor could have a field day with his domain name and twitter handle: @bodyforwife
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:29 PM
0

And be reasonable how you go about this knowing that since you are both a man and an mra, everything you say that can be twisted will be twisted. So be knowledgeable, be firm when required, and be reasonable. Consider doing this under your real name. Because you're going to be doxxed and threatened. Do it under your real name, if you can, and be reasonable, and that should keep feminist attempts to get you fired to a minumum. But, in this day and age, in a time of people still hurting from reces…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:12 PM
1

I find it interesting the label "felony murder" makes it sound like worse murder than most murders when, if I believe autowikibot, in some ways it is less murder than most murders since it can be accidental murder. But thanks, I appreciate the link and I agree.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:17 AM
2

I agree. But you don't know that's what occurred here. And you've offered no evidence that's what occurred here. So I am not going to be outraged by this. As a parent of a 17 year old, I'm going to say, I'm okay with this charging, and charging like this. Especially to the 18 year olds.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:15 AM
6

Would you like to offer any evidence the charging was based around the girl's gender? We're sending that message that the suppliers are going to be held fully to account," Washington County Attorney Pete Orput told reporters Wednesday. "There's a big lesson to be had out of this," Orput continued. "The lesson is: Guys, this isn't harmless. Handing out drugs to each other isn't harmless. This isn't a bag of weed. ... Nobody's dying from that stuff." The five teens have been charged with third-deg…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:57 AM
2

I see we need a new flair: [OP is a moron] flair.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:46 PM
2

Should be written in the skies whenever Slate publishes her.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:56 PM
2

I am pretty sure you can find it on the wikipedia and at NPR, The Atlantic, Salon, Slate, Jezebel, Time, the Guardian, and the Raw Story
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:09 PM
3

I'm running out the door, but some quick thoughts: "society" and a very early social studies class when I was in middle school taught by a feminist did "teach" me to put women on a pedestal. That was wrong all the way around. "the culture I am from", "my family", did not teach me any skills or support me for reaching out to women, but did teach to fear failure and fear scorn from failure My quick and gross conclusion is that I think there is some wisdom in fathers hiring hookers to get their son…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:21 PM
2

Regarding "Nice Guy", some observations... In the recent UCSB spree killing coverage I found several articles that referred to "Nice Guy" as a "manosphere" trope, none of them tracing it back to being a reaction to feminist language. Did the reporters not do their homework? Did they buy into the feminist trope? I have seen several manosphere posts, some here at /r/mr that DO buy into the feminist line of Nice Guys just being passive aggressive "betas" too afraid to ask women out and basically ra…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:34 PM
2

Sadly, for such a huge dipshit, and factually a proven liar, she has had a stellar career, moving from blogger in the middle of Texas to Slate/RawStory columnist, and being able to add journalist to her resume. She is a huge dipshit and a proven liar, but the media loves her.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:30 PM
2

I'm on a phone and on the run so I wasn't able to read your entire post. In general, I would love to see a website / wiki / faq come to life with well researched, well written articles of about 1000 words max that took apart the biggest feminist myths and lies. With the outrage removed and the plain truths remaining. I'd love to see that indexed, categorized, and made available as a general reference source. I don't know the best way to do that. Honestly, I was thinking of such a thing last nigh…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:35 PM
0

No I said it first, so you fuck off!
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:29 PM
3

That is an awesome column by Kay Hymowitz.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:29 PM
1

That's a very nice catch, Lobsterman... Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:24 PM
-1

I read the story. As I have said, it gives no reason for the RO. I apologize I had a different take on the article than you. Why don't you fuck off now.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:08 PM
0

I haven't even said they are wrong. I've said the article is unclear. The documents they offer provide no clarification. They may have very good reasons to ask for an RO. I've even written I don't mind monkeywrenching corrupt systems to break them. But on its face, it seems like the very abuse of ROs they protest against. Which is why honesty and transparency are key.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:30 PM
0

Your argument is they shouldn't ask for a restraining order for an armed criminal who has made threats and intimidated witnesses because an outside observer might think they are frivolously abusing the system in the same way he encourages women to. I haven't said that at all. Legally, they probably cannot publish allegations anyway. Of course they can. That's why papers used "alleged". And they can clearly say "we have a fear Mr. Nazarian because ..." That's clearly opinion.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:14 PM
0

What I said is that the article isn't clear. It should be. What I also said was: I think that abusing a corrupt system to the point it breaks is a legitimate tactic for protesters and activists. It's a form of monkey wrenching I can get behind. But I also think that honesty and transparency should accompany that. Without the honesty and transparency what it appears to an outside observer is that AVFM is just abusing the same system for the same reasons with no additional principles behind it tha…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:50 PM
2

When they don't provide a reason, and given their dealings with Nazarian they may have very legitimate reasons, and when they proudly proclaim FTSU, it's an easy conclusion to draw that this is more a way of fucking the guy over then a legitimate restraining order. FWIW, I think that abusing a corrupt system to the point it breaks is a legitimate tactic for protesters and activists. It's a form of monkey wrenching I can get behind. But I also think that honesty and transparency should accompany …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:02 PM
2

I read that and the article isn't clear why AVFM feels they need a restraining order against Nazarian. It's not in the pdf they label as "Nazarian Restraining Order Requeest" either. What do I care? Nazarian can rot. But um, getting restraining orders when you have no need of one is what AVFM (and the rest of us) label as "abuses of the restraining order system".
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:52 PM
2

I would like pills, or something, that would make me like wearing a tie.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:45 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:50 AM
1

Just that if it gets raised to anyone at the WH's attention at all that MRA groups are some sort of danger, well come on, we live in an age of the FBI, and the NSA, and warrantless wiretapping, and secret FISA orders delivered to Google, Yahoo, ... REDDIT Risk seems low, but hey, I am not sure we should sign up a petition to the WH claiming /r/MensRights harbors terrorists.... Be careful what you wish for.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:42 AM
1

freezepage.com, archive.is, archive.org
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:22 AM
1

Given who he is, it is to be expected. Nice though that Ph.D, skeptic, freethinker gets so many details wrong. He finds it easy to excoriate, but not worth his time getting his information from primary sources and making sure his details are correct. OTOH, is there a link? You really need to submit a link before outraging about something on the net you dislike, otherwise you fall into the same trap as Plait.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:18 AM
2

Classify the Men's Rights Movement as a terrorist group The Men's Rights Movement (MRM) is a misogynistic movement that advocates violence against women and girls. Multiple members of the MRM--self identified Men's Rights Activists (MRAs)--have committed atrocities and mass murders. Marc Lepine killed 17 women on a university campus in the "Montreal Massacre". Tom Ball firebombed a courthouse and wrote a manifesto encouraging others to bomb government buildings that is posted on major MRM websit…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:21 AM
3

I mean, it's really hard to take people who think they are unicorns or wolves seriously. TIL pelican poseurs look down on furries. :)
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:06 PM
2

Thanks for posting this. That's the most tortured and butthurt example of an author complaining about his Amazon reviews I've ever seen. Yes, Amazon reviews can be easily gamed, and are, by all sides. Making this a freedom of speech issue is outrageous. And his book was panned from left, right, and center, including from Salon.com.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:49 PM
5

I would have preferred a freezepage.com, archive.is, or archive.org page of it myself.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:44 PM
10

Should women have their own corner of the interwebz to hate men on? Uh, so should we start a whitehouse petition to name tumblr a terrorist site? Seriously, I would sign that. Not as an MRA, but as a web developer. fwiw, tumblr is a site for some darn good free porn.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:26 PM
1

something something famous Jesse Jackson quote something something
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:57 PM
1

Rapier wit. (Hmm, that might be a good title for a feminist critical blog)
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:56 PM
1

Nah, sorry, just a mini-rant about double standards about murders and murders of families committed by women that we are by feminist groups we should understand as her being a victim of depression or other forms of mental illness. Compared to Rodger who we are told by feminists to ignore the mental illness and focus on his misogyny. If you wish to delete it, feel free, no hard feelings, I thought it was semi-obvious.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:30 AM
1

It's a test post. Does there have to be a link?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:24 AM
2

Call it whatever the fuck you want. Call them cunts, it's what you want to call them, and it's what you call them when no one is looking and it's just you. In 30 years when the MRM has gotten nowhere, tell me how it's worked for you, and for us.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:52 PM
7

There are a million legitimate ways to discuss these issues without making yourself sound like a fucking moron. And worse, US!
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:03 AM
5

NAFALT is distinctly different from NAMALT or NAWALT. NAMALT / NAWALT refers to men and women. Each are hugely diverse groups with many differing political philosophies. NAFALT refers to feminism, which is a particular political philosophy that is taught in universities. It is illogical to make broad sweeping generalizations of ALL MEN and ALL WOMEN, but if feminism means anything, then outside observers with a familiarity of feminist theory should be able to make reliable predictions of feminis…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:42 AM
14

I think it's particularly unhelpful for you to refer to it as vaginamoney. That helps no one and it's a pretty easy leap (though a logical fallacy) to go from /u/Ucanthandledatruth hates vaginamoney /u/Ucanthandledatruth links alimony to vaginas /u/Ucanthandledatruth hates vagina /u/Ucanthandledatruth hates women /u/Ucanthandledatruth is an MRA Therefore MRA hate women I don't think you should make it that easy for people who dislike you or men's issues to claim you or MRAs are inherently misogy…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:37 AM
8

Thanks, that's insightful to understand Rodger, but that's still not the feminist claim "men are taught they are entitled...". Thanks for that insight, but no, you're going to have to do harder to over turn typhonblue's claim.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:21 PM
7

That's a goalpost shift No, it's not. You asked for evidence that men are really being harmed and I provided it. Dude, that's explicitly not true. I wrote: Well, let me know when MRAs (MRAs not men) are being dragged out tortured and killed. And Yet somehow you haven't been able to show that it's wrong or inaccurate in any way. I've provided many ways your analogy is inaccurate and wrong.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:43 PM
9

Men are beaten, raped, abused and have their children taken away because of widely accepted lies which claim we are less fit to taken care of children, that we cannot be harmed by domestic violence and that we cannot be raped. Isn't that enough? That's a goalpost shift because you said MRAs and this thread has been about blood libel against MRAs. When will we have your permission to speak out against the lies told about us? That's a shaming tactic. You don't need my permission and you have my pe…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:16 PM
8

If a guy feels entitled to sex/love without offering tangible qualities, he is met with scorn, from both genders. The notion that the mere personality of a man is enough to warrant a partner is unthinkable. Instead, he's seen as a worthless slob who is too lazy to improve himself. Or, in internet speak, he's a "neckbeard fedora loser virgin creep". I agree with most of this. In my take they aren't the neckbeards (who won't get women automatically), they are the Biff Tannen, rapist Johnny, leg sw…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:09 PM
10

Well, let me know when MRAs (MRAs not men) are being dragged out tortured and killed. Till then I think analogies like yours are extreme and unhelpful.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:56 PM
1

Well the fbi the santa barbara pd comcast/verizon/... certainly do.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:06 PM
14

Do you think the bullshit, wrong, claims that Elliot Rodger was an MRA or that MRAs encourage violence or that male mass shooters are MRAs or often entitled white rich boys IS EQUIVALENT TO Much of Europe, much of Christianity claiming the Jews killed Christ Jews kidnap Christian children at Passover and sacrifice them to bake the blood into their matzo? Which since the 12th Century at least has led to the the imprisonment of Jews the torture of Jews by mobs the killing of Jews by mobs If you th…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:53 PM
3

No, I am saying the mythical Feminist Nice Guy is a chupacabra. It makes no sense saying "that dog has some characteristics of a chupacabra".
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:30 AM
5

I honestly don't know what you mean by that, but since you brought it up, I wouldn't believe anything Hitler said about the Jews, even understanding people are complex creatures not accurately described by archetypes. The Hitlerian archetype of Jews, gays, etc., was 100,000% wrong. The feminist archetype of "Nice Guys" is 1000% wrong. It's their chupacabra.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:41 AM
15

Yeah. Not sure that actually exists outside of feminist blogs. It's a one sided portrayal of a feminist bogeyman.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:27 AM
5

No, no, no. I appreciate seeing your comments, but I don't think you should buy in any manner into the feminist cryptozoology beast of the Nice Guy. It's just not an accurate description of people.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:26 AM
11

Point me to one serious, significant, meaningful conversation ever had on a tumblr blog that didn't occur: in disqus as blog posts That is, the fundamental tumblr "liked this - reblog" interaction is totally useless and simply exists as a feel good ego boost (look how many reblogs!) and a speech gate (I signal I am a good person in this movement by my reblogs!) And that goes beyond feminism. That goes to any topic at tumblr. So seriously, point me to a single significant, meaningful conversation…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:24 AM
2

Yeah, work on that angle for a little while. Think about it some. Get back to me.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:08 AM
3

True, he's making the same sort of error that the article itself is making. Excellent point.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:20 AM
3

Most liberals have never been to Kos.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:41 AM
0

Did you ever hear of Vietnam you fucking retard?
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:53 PM
1

Fuck you asshole. I know how much it cost my wife in therapy and I know how much it cost me & my wife in therapy, and I know how much it cost me & my kids in therapy, and I know how much it cost when I went to therapy alone. Also, fuck off asshole.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:52 PM
2

Kos is blaming Men's Rights. Kos is not Liberals. Larn some basic logic, dumbass.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:25 PM
16

I completely disavow everything about Elliot Rodger, but if you believe he was mentally ill, then it is wrong to dehumanize him and call him a piece of shit. My heart goes out to his victims and to their families. Their deaths, injuries and pain such a tragedy that I wish could have been prevented. But if Rodger was mentally ill, then he is a victim as well, and we should not be referring to him as a piece of shit. He was a very troubled, deranged person who in the end brought pain, sadness and …
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:22 PM
9

I think you're absolutely right. When I got out of college, Ronald Reagan was turning out the mentally ill (mostly men) to live on the streets. And we've seen the severe depression, and the increased suicides among all men (and in soldiers) and very little is done. When I have sought therapy I have mostly found women therapists with a mostly feminist agenda and unwilling or unable to truly empathize or even believe what I've had to say. Worse, when a woman looks for therapy she gets sliding scal…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:36 PM
-1

If they retweeted the above with a Not All Men, what that feminist seems to be saying is that she thinks all men are this mentally disturbed misanthropic misogynistic killer. If anything I would say that tweet with hashtag #NAMALT projecting him onto all men demonstrates her own sociioathic misandry. On the other hand, this guy and his video is a Jezebel wet dream, and a Journalists and pundit and talk show host's wet dream as well and people, leaders, writers, and websites within the men's move…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:23 PM
10

The video is literally a Jezebel/Slate/Salon wet dream with almost every mra stereotype made present. I clicked on the verson from here: http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000002900707/youtube-video-retribution.html I'm actually surprised the NYTimes published this. It was my understanding (from movies and tv shows) that these sorts of videos are not published in order to remove the incentive from future mass killers, kidnappers, assassins, etc. We need to be better at treating mental illness an…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:05 PM
1

fwiw, if you trace the links this story is 5 years old.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:55 PM
2

The article is not new, but I am glad you posted. The article was posted when the study came out, but it is good to see how expected and typical how the comments are running. Depressing too. Feminism, a human rights movement :/
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:46 PM
1

It's much worse than /r/pyongyang since most amrs don't know how terrible their arguments are. Some have addressed the misleading, taken out of context, missing the point truly moronic level of posts and comments there with the defense used by David Futrelle that their job is to "mock" and thus they don't need to be faithful to the facts. But somehow mocking an argument when you don't understand it, when you misrepresent it, when you miss the point doesn't really seem to be a terribly useful for…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:23 PM
4

femsplain is perfectly reasonable and accurately describes the very real phenomena of how feminists deal with arguments and people they dislike. Is it a comment on feminist argumentation techniques. femsplain is satirical. femsplain reflects on their very bullshit gross sweeping generalization of mansplain which stereotypes and essentializes half the population. femsplain is not crude nor reference any body parts You're out of order. This whole thread is out of order.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:06 PM
32

Don't tuck her into bed so much as place her on her side with some towels and pillows wedged to make sure she doesn't roll on her back. (Jimi Hendrix, John Bonham, Bon Scott thank you for this additional measure.) Also, check around the room, make sure Bryan Cranston can't get in cause that guy will remove the wedges.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:36 PM
1

But several people here have insisted that if I care about men's rights, then I'm an MRA Interesting. I haven't experienced that. I have assumed you were an MRA because you posted here. I am a reluctant MRA, but identify more with father's rights, and egalitarians myself. I might be more of an MRA if so many MRA leaders would stop being idiots.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:54 PM
1

Thanks. So that's what google hinted at, but I'm so out of it, I don't do comics. :/ But thanks.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:27 AM
2

Not sure who Francine Castle is. A few months back, "sister punisher" was tossed around Sara Mayhew. Also "chill girl", and "gender traitor". http://i.imgur.com/P58mH5U.jpg that's almost certainly Melody Hensley of CFI calling a couple of women who do not identify as feminists, identify as skeptical atheists as "sister punishers". So who's Francine Castle?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:42 AM
20

Good for you Throwaway, good for you. /rolls eyes
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:59 AM
5

No thanks, I'll throw in my lot with the men Sure, but now you're a gender traitor, chill girl and a sister punisher.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:37 AM
5

It's flaired "re: feminism" As BlueOak9 I think pointed out, it has to do with the feminist pimp hand. It relates to various lies told in the name of feminism that hurt men's issues. "If you believe in equality, you are a feminist". "MRAs cannot be feminists". "Republican women cannot be feminists". "I need feminism because..." It's also notable to see how they deny agency to women who disagree with them. While women are not our "enemy", in many ways, feminism "is". It directly opposes many men'…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:05 PM
1

MGTOWs advocate men separating entirely from women. The Red Pill is a subreddit where they advocate radical positions, including repealing the nineteenth amendment. Sigh. I don't want to do any of that, and I am glad both "movements" took names sure to alienate others including many they would like to persuade.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:20 PM
2

Serious question: maybe a stupid n00b question. What is the difference between MGTOW and TRP?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:20 PM
1

Feynman is always good. He tells us how to think. How to formulate theories. He tells us we have to be brutally honest with our own theories. So now we know more about how to think about our own theories, and we also know more about how to consider any feminist theory. And how theories that are vague, or can't be disproven are nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:28 PM
3

Well thanks for reading my dissertation, and if I changed your mind, hey, awesome! That said, freezepage is more memorable, but archive.is seems to promise to keep the page longer and so is probably a better service to use. Oh! Apparently another way to do the same thing with a lot more longevity is to use the wayback machine directly and feed it the url. http://i.imgur.com/2I76TRc.jpg https://archive.org/web/web.php
/r/MensRights21/05/14 05:13 AM
3

No, I'm not saying that at all! The reason the page loads just as fast is because it IS the page. donotlink only puts it in an iframe mangles the referrer The site gets the same traffic. The site gets the same advertising revenue. The only thing donotlink does is keeps the site from getting google fu keeps YOU from easily getting to the site so that you can see the context Let me clarify what I said and maybe step back just a bit. The Social Justice Warriors get their snoot in the air with the h…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:58 AM
0

They use it to hide their bullshit. We should be out, loud, and proud of what we say and offer good quality easy links to the original material.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:19 AM
1

Ugh, please don't use donotlink.com. Use archive.is, or freezepage, or other archival sites, but donotlink does not make it easy to get to the original site. (Need to right click, show this frame only) does not reduce traffic to the site, just obfuscates the referral link It's a pain in the ass. Also consider what pissing in the ocean does to the sea water level. Donotlink will have little effect on the traffic to a site. All donotlink does is make it hard for anyone to follow a link. And yeah, …
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:55 AM
-1

I think my point is that it's not sufficient to describe it as a drilldown which gives an impression a subreddit's readers are part of a static group that can be analyzed with some sort of snapshot and crawling. It would be more accurate to describe this as an analysis of a subreddit's past 1000 hot threads, representing X readers, out of Y threads in Z days and a subscribership of A and a total views of B and a reddit lifetime of C. Otherwise, I think you got bupkis.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:04 PM
1

So you have TWO of these guys who most people regard as jerks but you think well enough of that you want some advice on. Well, good on you. So when you tell this to HR that you think highly of him and want to broaden his experiences (and maybe mellow him out) what does HR say?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:39 PM
1

Apparently SirNeon is describing in subredditanalysis his methods and code, so that's good. Still he claims it's a "drilldown" but it's only an analysis of the past 1000 "hot" threads with so far no indication of what that means or how representative that is.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:37 PM
1

So it's a drilldown of the latest 1000 hot threads. So I'm curious, how many months back does that go for this reddit, and how does that compare to other reddits?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:36 PM
-1

How can you say that unless you've been told his methodology inspected her code? Isn't the default position, the null hypothesis that it's bullshit until proven otherwise?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:26 PM
1

Is this the same intern who 4 days ago only had a week left?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:24 PM
-1

It's meaningless unless he shares his methodology and source code. Even if she does share her methodology and source code, it might still be meaningless. Sample size, depth of drill down, time & calendar issues, etc.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:19 PM
1

I am absolutely not a lawyer. My pure guess is that it is contractual. Some piece of paper a student signs upon entering college gives the school the ability to create and enforce rules by way of this "judicial" process. This would seem to be similar to how two or more parties can agree to arbitration.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:34 PM
2

A lot of mothers of boys understand what feminist lies are. Many many other women do as well. Feminists love to say "Patriarchy hurts men too", but it really is true that feminism and misandry hurts women. It hurts any women who has a son, a brother, a father, a nephew, an uncle or is married to a man.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 05:38 AM
2

I think that's an excellent question. And no. (Sort of semi-related. I have long been saddened there seems to be no public interest law firm, like the ACLU, set up to fight zero tolerance policies. And if I could be more disappointed with lawyers and graduating law students, it's that none of them have set anything like that up.)
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:40 PM
5

It is a small step, and you're absolutely right, it is almost impossible to sue for defamation and still get on with life, being a student, getting a job, etc. But it is a step, and it can help point the way forward by showing new and successful strategies. Difficult as it is, there are several lawsuits now progressing. We can support them and steps like this and due our part. That might be raising awareness, it might be letter writing campaigns, it might be raising funds.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:39 PM
20

The only way to stop this bullshit is to hit them in their wallets.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:46 PM
2

I've never seen NAWALT before, and have seen NAFALT for several years starting with GWW's video. If you don't mind I'll take your word for what happens in the TRP and other places. If they are making broad sweeping generalizations about all women, that sounds pretty stupid as well and on a par with NAMALT.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:59 PM
6

omphaloskepsis +1
/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:19 AM
15

They seem similar but are used in different fashion. It's NAFALT not NAWALT. Not All Feminists, not Not All Women. So if it is generalizing over something, it is generalizing over feminists, not over all of womankind. Since feminism is a political philosophy (or ideology) and academic discipline, it is reasonable to expect feminists to conform to some core general principles (which they choose themselves), and then to complain when discussions of those principles are met with "Well, I'm not like…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:16 AM
2

Fair enough. Sorry about that. I still think the original comment (that got downvoted) deserved its downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 10:23 PM
6

She said I'm an engineer, but when I walk into a meeting (I work for a very large company) people who don't know me assume I'm someone's secretary. Once, when I piped up about some science that didn't make sense, I was told "what makes you think you're qualified to comment on that?" If I were a man, I wouldn't have to defend my educational background. There are also the occasional times where I get called "honey" or "sweetheart" during a meeting. to which you it was replied If I were a man, I wo…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:57 PM
6

Fuck you. From what is presented that asshole goes and assaults at least two of the women. The woman who tried to rob him deserves her beatdown but all the shit that rained on that drunkard's ass? He bought it, paid for it, and deserved it.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:19 PM
1

Odds are they are both shooped. Apart from reddit wtf there is no mention anywhere on the net of that sign, and there is no mention of Metro having a campaign against sexual harassment. They announced a survey 10 days ago saying 20% of all of their passengers men and women have had some problems with sexual harassment on the Metro, it is doubtful a real campaign would target the pervs and not tell people how to report incidents and give a phone number, etc. It's bullshit, it makes /r/mensrights …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:11 PM
1

Yeah, that's a bad photoshop. Please stop being a moron. Enjoy your karma points.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:07 PM
1

That's not anyone's offical metro agency sign, that's a specific campaign from a non-profit. No official metro agency in the US (or Canada) is going to phrase any sort of poster that way, if only because without phone numbers, reporting information etc., they are just asking to be roasted in the press for their unsafe buses and trains. It's a hoax.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:47 PM
14

This sign is an obvious hoax and your outrage, while noted, is a sign you may be unhinged. There is no other googleable mention of such a sign "Respect Our Women Passengers" linked to LA Metro There is no press account or LA Metro account of a campaign to stop harassment of women If there were such a campaign, it wouldn't use the language on this poster Signs would not tell the pervs to stop their behavior, they would tell people how to report incidents There is no bilingual poster or infographi…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:33 PM
3

I understand what you are trying to do, but it's a misleading title that will be intentionally misread by others as an attempt to portray /r/mensrights as some sort of rape apologists.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:28 AM
1

IANAL but sounds like a material change to me. I would speak with at least one other lawyer.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:45 PM
0

Just a small quibble, when someone says “I basically said,..." My immediate thought is "What specifically, precisely did you say or do?". "Basically" covers a lot of faults and "basically said" is a cover for a lot of miscommunication and unclarity. IF we take her story at face value and do not question it, and cannot question his story, then yes, she was raped EDITED: maybe she was raped, but I agree with sun-moon-stars below. This woman does not describe any reason whatsoever that she is in an…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:21 PM
-4

You should see a psych turn off the interwebs return your router You are harming yourself.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:48 PM
1

I know it's a real thing. I keep telling people about my factual opinions regarding their terrible unaesthetic designs and they keep telling me to piss off until I am god or dictator.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:34 PM
1

Well that's no skin off my nose, but I would say that takes you out of the running to design webpages for me.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:38 PM
1

That's not quite true. link also makes font very small link also uses crappy white text on black background
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:56 PM
1

Thanks for the response. I would certainly like to see it go up before the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:21 PM
3

I am not a lawyer, but I am curious if you are one? Can you explain why challenging the guidelines themselves were doomed to failure (as opposed to the notion of child support). Can you explain how one would challenge the child support itself? As not a lawyer I can understand challenging the guidelines, that seems to be a law. But how do you challenge the notion itself? I would really encourage you to write what you have found in article format and submit it somewhere (avfm of wherever). I am ok…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:08 PM
1

Ignoring this article in particular, I think it's completely reasonable to claim "A voice for men..." when discussing articles that appear at AVFM. It is an edited magazine. It is not a bboard, it is not a subreddit, it is not 4chan. That IS the voice of Paul Elam, John Hembling, and Dean Esmay. And that is certainly how their critics and the MSM will view such articles. As nuttery coming from Paul Elam and AVFM. I have urged them often to gain their editorial voice, determine what values they h…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:53 PM
0

This is not a feminist safe space. Nor is it AVFM.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:27 PM
0

Hey long time lurker first time caller, Why don't you actually engage in conversations here PRIOR to telling us we are all fucktards, bigots, sexists and racists? Also, fuck off.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:25 PM
1

Well I admit, I am curious, I'd love to see a list of liberal female writers writing on the anti-rape hysteria side. Also, I'd say that Cathy Young, who considers herself a feminist, is libertarian certainly, but probably not conservative. I can't think of a single liberal woman who consistently writes "on the anti-rape hysteria" side. Perhaps Hannah Rosin or Katie Roiphe but they are not consistent, and I suspect Roiphe has been kicked out of feminism by feminists more times than either of us c…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:55 PM
3

My god, get out the fainting couch, an anonymous commenter said we should invite her to AD and have sex with her!! Not only is that weak for a Cosmo article, but it sure makes Ann Bartow, law professor, look like an idiot. Ann Bartow's upset shames all victims of actual intimidation and threats, and her upset can only be resolved by a complete elimination of anonymous commenting as well as a demanded monitoring of all comments.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:07 PM
2

That skit was so terribly unfunny that even a lot of feminists decried it. The question is what would have happened if it had been a funny sketch?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:44 PM
7

Personally, I like to push the boundaries and joke about anything and everything. Why? Because I'm not-so-subtly making fun of the people who actually believe in the retarded shit I'm saying. I think this is "hipster irony" and "progressive racism". I can find it at many sites I enjoy, but it never convinces me that the owner by making a racist joke is actually not the racist he claims to be making fun of. If you choose to make a racist joke because you think you are mocking racists, just unders…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:42 PM
1

A mother ran off with her kids, then later had the gall to sue the father for custody arrears. A California Court said nuh, uh, The trial court found that mother had been "unjust" in her unilateral decision to remove father from the children’s lives. This is tantamount to a finding of "unclean hands." We reiterate our statement in Keith G. v Suzanne H. (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 853, 862: "These are some of the dirtiest hands we have seen." As expressly indicated by the trial court, this was "terribl…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:15 PM
-17

Totally stupid and literally nonsensical cartoon. Both parents shown are men. Proof: use of the word dude demonstrates parent of kid is a man, and indicates the person using it is a man. Both parents shown are in fact shown nursing kids with a bottle. So therefore It is extremely stupid to think the first dude while nursing his baby with a bottle, would warn the second dude who is nursing his baby with a bottle of the dangers of letting his son nursing a doll with a bottle. This is not a cute, f…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:34 AM
2

The Admins are idiotic corporate fucktards and worse they are each just plain stupid and I am glad you won't stfu.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:52 PM
1

Cops Ignore 911 Call from 9 Year Old Boy. He is Later Found to be Murdered by his Mother. is a very much different story than Cops Ignore 911 Call from 9 Year Old Boy in June. By December his mother kills him. YOU WRITE is nitpicky AND WHAT I WROTE is slightly misleading. Makes me think "piss off". But instead, I'll ask, did oneiorosgrip get banned or something? This new name seems to have an interesting story behind it.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:11 PM
12

Oh, I agree almost entirely with you. But it's sort of a click baity title and there was plenty of room to explain better what happened.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:35 PM
8

She describes this dude as wasted from the get go, then falling asleep on her constantly. You say he would normally do this, but the history of the relationship is that normally he wouldn't. They had never hooked up before and Schumer says (trying to be funny) she was the last girl he called that night at 8 am in the morning. She then identifies him "Matt from her home town a senior in his 5th year" and describes his sexual dysfunction. And I'm no doctor, but that is probably another sign he is …
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:39 PM
96

The title is slightly misleading. The call was made 6 months prior to his murder. I am absolutely not saying the cops or CPS handled this properly. I am only saying the impression of the title is that the call was in response to the murder in progress.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:27 PM
7

There's nothing fortunate about this. The pull requests should have been honored as reddit admins and founders claim reddit to be an inclusive place. FSF is a troll (out of 4chan) and I say to them, power on. Google 'em for past efforts. Compare this (troll) attempt to what happened in December over at node.js an libuv http://www.dailydot.com/news/github-gendered-pronoun-debate/
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:00 PM
-1

You have a keen grasp. You will make a fine lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:04 AM
3

In Washington State, a prosecutor just went after a kickstarter project that was overfunded and never delivered. http://www.wkrn.com/story/25408365/washington-state-sues-head-of-kickstarter-project This would never happen, but boy would it be lulzy.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:39 PM
3

That's cool. I'm glad to see you align yourself with Administration infringement of civil rights across the board. You're a real mensch.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:06 PM
2

Much as this hurts American boys, I confess to wanting to pour gasoline on the fire. The Administration has gotten away with a ton of civil rights infringement, and it does it by raising the temperature 1 degree at a time. So I'd like to see the Administration really nail some well heeled University to the wall and force the University to fight back. Is it possible the way to get that to happen is to "troll" and egg the Administration on?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:51 AM
0

wat
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:17 PM
4

I went to a college, decades ago, where beer flowed, and people grew weed in the courtyard. And all of that was illegal, but it was also done with moderation by all. But today's freshmen, often women, binge drink and brag about binge drinking in ways that would put us to shame. And it's 99% underage. As a parent of two girls entering college, yes, as an old fogey, I am saddened that Biden's report acknowledges these sexual assaults are often/mostly committed when these underage girls are drunk, …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:20 AM
2

Thank you Mrs. P!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:01 AM
5

Since 9/11, I've heard a lot of vets say all sorts of stuff on Internet forums, but this guy http://i.imgur.com/jbFp04d.jpg is literally, and I am being serious here, literally the first guy who makes me wonder just how low the Army intelligence test is going.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:59 AM
5

PUBLIC URINATION CHARGES!!! AIEEE!!!!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:50 AM
10

William Cohan's book as been mostly panned by all sides, including iirc, Salon. This interview turns him into a maliciously lying fool.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:47 AM
10

Clymer is the dumbshit who a few months ago declared false accusations less rare than being hit by lightning, and did so by comparing rates of apples with lifetime rates of oranges.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:44 AM
3

The admins have to be tards to think that the AMA of the founder of Men's Rights would not have tons of votes from /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:56 PM
2

I've heard that you can't manage what you don't measure I suspect these public rankings will be a good thing for all, but I would expect a few eggs to get broken along the way...
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:40 PM
2

Okay, well why don't you fuck off then back to AMR zero day troll.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:28 AM
2

Yeah sure, you're new to reddit.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 05:57 AM
1

The legal judgments that keep me from my children were based on poor feminist research and heavy feminist lobbying. While I look for men's rights, it is folly to ignore the many harms feminism does to men, children, and families just to keep zero day trolls happy.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:35 AM
1

huh... I don't know where the permalink is for tumblr... meh, it's not really worth it. Something something something 95% of the Internet. Sigh. TL;DR= I got really pissed off. We all do! :)
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:48 PM
6

I tend to agree. I did not read her book, End of Men, but I read her magazine articles that went into it, and they seem a lot more nuanced and even supportive of men then I think people give her credit for.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:30 PM
2

Is the link broken? I am just getting a tumblr login page.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:28 PM
2

I can't help but think that if Paul and John at AVFM respected my judgment as a reader, they would provide the link first and then tell me how to deconstruct it. Let me read it in context and in its entirety, let me think about it, then take it apart.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:09 PM
3

If I read the thread, I agree it doesn't seem like that ever happened. It also seems the thread in 2006 was convinced there was some connection between Krissy Scalzi and a bat. They keep referencing a poster John Scalzi made about that. It's a bit difficult to blame the Internet from misunderstanding a humorous poster made about my wife with a baseball bat threatening harm to properly understanding she would never do that. Or that John Scalzi himself doesn't condone violence. Here is one example…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 09:42 PM
1

So I looked at Varys, and thought "Varys", a comic book reference? I'm so out of it. Googled, ... GOT! Of course, should have known. The new X-Men it seems.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:37 AM
2

Thanks for the comment and best wishes to you. For me, it has just been the tear I've felt from being apart from my daughters. I could forego so much if they hadn't been alienated from me and we had a relationship.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:20 AM
0

I caught that too. It shows just how wacked out and ignorant the author is.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:14 AM
6

For me the financial burden is certainly not fun, but that's not what leads me to suicidal depths. The loss of parenting time, and then the eventual alienation is what lead me to suicide envy.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:09 AM
3

timoppenheimer, There are some sources out there that are terrible on their analysis, they are biased, they cherry pick, it's just awful stuff. But the incidents they collect, as a whole, are pretty damning. Start with their claims, investigate them, and then make your own interpretation. Remember Sun Tzu: If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If y…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:40 PM
5

You banned me about 9 months ago for a defense of Cathy Young. If you own a whiteboard, disallowing your neighbour from writing something you disagree with, like "women are not people". It is not censorship, because he can still write whatever you disagree with anywhere else. It becomes censorship only when you start erasing his messages when he writes them in places outside of your whiteboard. No, that is censorship. It is not government censorship; it is not a first amendment violation. ACLU o…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:34 PM
15

I believe the Harvard Prof came up with the data but it was a NYTimes feminist that came up with that particular statement.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:01 AM
3

Uh, well I think maybe you should learn more about it then. I think you would be better informed and have made a more knowledgeable comment.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:59 PM
3

A reasonable response to "some woman on the net" is to point out it's a website that has won awards for feminist blogging. It shows it it not just "some woman". In contrast 90% of AMR and manboobz stories are about "some commenter" in 80,000+ mensrights and yet, you can't say much about them except it's some random dude at reddit.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:57 PM
2

This is one feminist posing the question " No, it's Launched in July 2012, Feminist Current is the most-read feminist blog in Canada and won Best Feminism Blog in the 2012 Canadian Blog Awards. We provide a unique perspective on pop culture, politics, current events, sexuality, gender, and other issues that are often underrepresented or misrepresented by other media sources. And if you google it, feminists have a tradition of attacking drag. As I said, there is a history of feminists speech poli…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:50 PM
1

Heh, you should read my comments about AVFM, dumbass. And fwiw, I've railed about NAMALT as well. Piss off.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:49 PM
2

It's TERF bullshit. Fuck them. Most feminists can't stand them. Even AMR doesn't tolerate that kind of brain damage. Yeah. No. Launched in July 2012, Feminist Current is the most-read feminist blog in Canada and won Best Feminism Blog in the 2012 Canadian Blog Awards. We provide a unique perspective on pop culture, politics, current events, sexuality, gender, and other issues that are often underrepresented or misrepresented by other media sources. Take your NAFALT and stick it.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:40 PM
0

That's the point. Telling /r/mr about is pointless. Telling the cops about it is the only way to have any hope of finding what the truth is.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:37 PM
4

Nice. First comment is a classic "NAFALT" from AMR. Well done. Why don't you fuck off back to AMR? Launched in July 2012, Feminist Current is the most-read feminist blog in Canada and won Best Feminism Blog in the 2012 Canadian Blog Awards. We provide a unique perspective on pop culture, politics, current events, sexuality, gender, and other issues that are often underrepresented or misrepresented by other media sources.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:24 PM
0

Feminists may be total fucktards, but when did you hear of this asshole's acquittal and how long should we give the feminists? The story almost literally just came out.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:11 PM
2

Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:53 PM
1

If you want to give the boy custody of the kid fine, but that's not what the question was about. Chances are boys that are raped by an older woman still will not get custody of the kid, and they may not want to be a father at that young age. Regardless, no reason for the kid to be on the hook for paying custody support when he was raped.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:53 PM
2

So I read that, I didn't see any fuckery. What are you referring to?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:20 AM
1

I don't know what OP specifically meant by writing Why do men who are raped have to pay child support? But usually in the men's rights context, that refers to underage boys who have been raped, often whose rapist is never charged with rape, and who time after time have lost in court and have to pay child support. So that's basically what I answered, but I do believe it fits the question you asked as well. I will give you this bonus answer based on personal experience from the past three hours. I…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:17 AM
8

http://i.imgur.com/uaM5jOz.jpg
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:14 AM
1

I don't understand your comment. The OP says "a man who has been raped". To me, that implies a judge has determined the man has been raped. Perhaps the father is underage. Perhaps he is of age but was raped. What more proof should the state need to understand he should not be financially responsible for the child?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:05 AM
1

https://www.google.com/search?q=boy+raped+by+woman+has+to+pay+child+support
/r/MensRights25/04/14 12:59 AM
10

I don't have a single problem with her statements! If I could put line feeds in the headline it would be: Schrodinger's Assumptions: "Buying my album for $12 doesn’t mean you get to finger me" -- Iggy Azalea constantly gets fingered at her concerts. ... ... ... ... Mostly by girls My point is the assumptions that are made by feminists who cry "Schrodinger's Rapist", assuming all men could commit rape, and assuming women would not commit rape. Similarly with how feminists are sure that drunk wome…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:58 PM
3

Because child support isn't for the mother, it's for the child. The child did nothing wrong, and a child is entitled to be supported by both of its parents. Why? Why is a child entitled to be supported by a person victimized by that child's birth? Consider if you want what feminists say about abortion, that a fetus is a parasite inhabiting a woman's body and no one has the right to do that. Where does that child's entitlement to support from both parents, one of whom is a rape victim come from? …
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:41 PM
3

You can trivially find cases where a rape victim has to pay child support to the rapist. It's a very small step to conclude the rapist has legal custody of the child, and in these cases: it is doubtful the father would be given custody often, no one charged the rapist with rape
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:35 PM
3

Dunno. She also writes: Sure, men take a larger role in child-rearing than they used to—or at least more men are proud of announcing that they take a larger role. But that’s hardly the domain Dell had in mind when he imagined feminism as the catapult that would allow men to risk themselves “fearlessly in the adventure of life.” Judging by the public scene, much of the American male response to feminism has proceeded along one of two tracks: a doubling-down on anti-feminist political campaigns or…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:15 PM
8

I think the attempt by his ex to use copyright to suppress a suicide note that blames her is newsworthy in and of itself. If I knew a reporter, I would suggest the best thing to do is to Streisand this and get as many reporters to report on it and then as members of the press reproduce as much of the note as they can.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:55 PM
3

I feel terribly for Mackney's suicide and for his children. I will only say that up until the point of his suicide in his letter, I could have written that same letter about my own experiences. It is unconscionable that the letter could be suppressed by his ex-wife on the basis of copyright. I am unclear, which mods where, have been deleting these posts?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:44 PM
10

You are attributing things to this article that simply aren't there. She does not "lay out the social rules for boys to ask girls out". Rather, she points out that asking someone out in bad faith amounts to harassment. This is a bad lesson, because when he goes out into the real world and tries this routine of bugging clearly uninterested women for dates and attention—and exploiting their desire to be polite to force them to sit and listen to him while looking for a friend to rescue them—it will…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:55 PM
13

Did you read the article? Yes I did. Did you understand the article? The part where like a 19th Century Schoolmarm Miss Marcotte lays out the social rules for boys to ask girls out or risk being seen as a cad and petty bounder? Where she frames that it's the boy's job to ask girls out. States boys should not ask girls out who are out of their league? States boys should never ever just ask girls out, but need to follow Miss Marcotte's prescribed formalities of romance? Is there anything in there …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:25 PM
1

Thanks for submitting this. I (and my kids) am definitely a victim of parental alienation. Thanks for all your efforts to raise awareness and put an end to it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:12 PM
3

I saw that, but it's anonymous and so poorly sourced, and in addition, I haven't heard anything else remotely close to that, so as far as I am concerned it's just nonsense. I don't know what happened, but that document adds nothing. At this point it's no more credible as any of the bullshit stories that falsely accuse men.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:27 PM
2

I saw that, but it's anonymous and so poorly sourced, and in addition, I haven't heard anything else remotely close to that, so as far as I am concerned it's just nonsense. I don't know what happened, but that document adds nothing.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:25 PM
6

Ah, you've challenged me. If I don't provide the link it didn't happen and I'm a liar. I like that. And I'll be more than happy to give you the link. But you have to man up to your half of the challenge: if I give you the links that demonstrates she has been lying, you have to promise to delete your reddit account. This should be easy to take me up on, since you've been following the story since the beginning, right? You called me a liar, so you have to show you're man enough to make that claim.…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:18 AM
5

http://recode.net/2014/03/15/prominent-github-engineer-julie-ann-horvath-quits-claiming-gender-based-harassment/ Prominent GitHub Engineer Julie Ann Horvath Quits, Alleging Gender-Based Harassment March 15, 2014, 10:30 AM PDT It was a very big deal last month, because she made her fame by telling everyone how feminist github is. (basically). Then she came out and said she had been lying. Github is usual patriarchal brogrammer fedora neckberd #rapeculture crowd.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:11 AM
5

If this is the wrong flair, please let me know what the appropriate flair is. Tom's personal take on this can be found here: http://tom.preston-werner.com/2014/04/21/farewell-github-hello-immersive-computing.html Julie Ann Horvath is discussing this on twitter, which um, I'm a bit afraid to link to, but she is not a happy feemale at this time.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:04 PM
2

There are some terrific videos out there that show that the objectification of men in advertising is ubiquitous and normalized and assumed. A good "marketing" lecture would have discussed all of these tropes, what is wrong, what can be improved, is it effective, what is more effective, what messages are being presented, etc. A good "feminist" lecture would have just screamed "Patriarchy!" and "Male Gaze!" and "#RapeCulture" and "Objectification". In the first course there is every reason for a s…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:27 PM
1

Well, what I immediately think is that Firefox's pdf reader is crap. But that this is a very interesting article and thank you for posting it.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:30 PM
2

This is sort of one of those nasty moments I wish a pox on everyone's house. I hope the feminist scourging of academia proceeds swiftly and is thorough. Academic departments outside of feminism have has 20 years and longer to make any sort of comment or protest on the bullshit that gets handed out Ph.Ds and other degrees in gender studies and have failed. In the meantime feminism and gender studies have wreaked havoc throughout societies. Let these professors sleep in the streets warmed only by …
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:27 PM
-4

For speaking sense and the obvious, you get downvoted. That's how reddit works. Stupid framing: Men's Rights. Just begs for troubles and criticism. Smart framing: Men's Issues. Interesting. Enlightening. Hadn't thought about that.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:54 PM
3

Not to mention most of the petition mill sites are basically used to create spamming lists for other causes that avoid CANSPAM precisely because you established a relationship with them.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:48 PM
4

I read the news today, oh boy.... :( I wanted to thank you for all your efforts and all your time spent at FRS and COTWA. It was a very valuable resource -- it was one of the sites I often recommended people read for a sane examination of men's issues. I hope it will continue in that over at AVfM. So thanks.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:15 PM
1

Awesome, thank you.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:22 PM
1

I agree (I think) and that's my bias. If there was a social media tag, that would be great, cause then I'd never read it. Win win for everyone I think. But then, I'd miss some legitimate outrage. The Zero Tolerance policy that kicks some kid out of school for being a boy kind of thing.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:52 PM
2

I dunno, it sure seems like satire, but I see no actual evidence it is satire. The comments certainly seem to take it seriously. But damn, it sure seems like satire.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:46 PM
1

Hey, thank you for even asking. My preference I guess would be with the flair "social media", but outrage is fine and better in my mind than "Rec. Outrage".
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:43 PM
18

Your story is shocking. At this hour for me, I am not sure what to say. But you and your father have my best wishes. Be well.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:55 AM
3

Thank you for marking this with flair "Recreational Outrage". Fit the item perfectly.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:47 AM
1

Ah thank you. I am not getting the meaning of "Rec." "Recommended?" "Recorded"? (It reminds me too much of the cheap cassette decks I grew up with which had two labels "Play" and "Rec")
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:25 AM
1

Well, I do wish there was a flair for "facebook" or "tumblr" so I skip 'em
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:56 PM
1

Shame the reddit admins are too busy keeping twitter citations off of reddit and otherwise losing money to build a decent polling app.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:59 AM
1

Thank you. Not sure how I missed them. I only saw the bogified results being discussed.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:52 PM
1

I am curious - I must have missed it. Where is the original /r/MensRights thread opening this poll?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:59 PM
11

I only listened to it while it played on a secondary monitor, but I didn't catch them male bashing. They seemed to be saying these male behaviors were good behaviors, and even measured as such by psychologists and sociologists. And that women should learn from them. But I wasn't truly paying attention to it, so can you point out the male bashing?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:17 PM
12

This relates to how sexualized jokes and put downs in the office is not sexual harassment, but truly is just the way men speak to each other and deal with each other and otherwise engage in "team play". This article suggests this teaches good life skills and helps everyone succeed in the face of loss. Women demand this be deemed a hostile work environment and a reason they should be given different treatment and preferential treatment. But we don't do this for men, and we don't do this for child…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:19 PM
1

I don't mind it being a report nearly as much as I "mind" that you and so many many many other readers here submit links with titles that are not descriptive. Reddit gives you 300 characters. You chose to use zero of them to describe the content. And then to make matters worse, giving us no description in the title, you ask for us to join you in outrage. Come on dude, please, you can do better.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:29 PM
3

No thanks. Not only is it a repeat, but you are discourteous in not describing the actual topic in the headline.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:05 AM
2

If you google stiletto heels murder (prior to this latest incident) it goes on for pages and pages and pages of unique times when women killed men using their stiletto shoes. I mean, women truly do know that stilettos can be deadly. I am not going to compare this to gun violence or knife violence or whatever, it's just that it's a lot more common than you'd think.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:27 PM
7

I saw some of that happen in real time and read about 3/4s of your post. While I agree no one was doxxed if doxxing is to have any meaning, it is quite likely that according to Reddit's very crazy rules on doxxing, the person was doxed. There is no good or easy way to fact check Futrelle. When I have pinned him down on facts he elided he simply says its not his job to mock or correct the feminists or anti-mras, his job is to mock mras. And by mock he doesn't even mean an intellectually honest cr…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:44 AM
3

Tell her your gay what?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:53 AM
2

Get an attorney Subpoena her phone records and her friends to verify your story Have your attorney figure out something to sue her over (fraud? rape by misrepresentation?)
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:53 AM
14

Steve, if you're reading very interesting account, thanks for posting it What is Canadian law on reporting, photography, free speech?
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:36 PM
2

I admit I am not exactly sure what to make of your posts and invite you to answer my response below. But when you write Also, it angers and disappoints me how many non-heterosexual men are manginas/white knights/feminists/heterophobes/etc. For some reason I can't help but think of Neil deGrasse Tyson "Watch out" meme.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:21 PM
1

That's an interesting link so thank you. Being written in the entertainment section of the LA Times and not in a peer reviewed journal does take away a good deal of its credibility. I mean it is interesting, it is a good story, but it's hard to say how accurate it is. For example, as a painter on Andromeda peering through a telescope, I could take the average "color" of the light from Planet Earth and draw one blue oceanic ball with no continents. And it would all be accurate and yet completely …
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:09 PM
31

Feminists often like to downplay the fact that domestic violence is as high in lesbian couples as it is in heterosexual couples, which is an awkward fact to acknowledge when they are trying to claim it is men who are the abusers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_domestic_violence Some studies show that lesbian relationships have similar levels of violence as heterosexual relationships,[8] while other studies report that lesbian relationships exhibit substantially higher rates of phys…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:57 PM
6

Would you do me a favor and list the top 5 issues you believe the MRM tries to advocate for and explain how those issues are not supportive of non-heterosexual MRAs? And then list another 5 that you think the MRM does not advocate for, but should because non-heterosexual MRA issues are MRA issues? Also, just for kicks, can you provide me the link to the last reddit survey of /r/mensrights and give me your thoughts of that survey? Can you name 5 MRA leaders and describe how they have not been sup…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:49 PM
1

So I haven't seen a single episode of Man Men, though as a kid, I grew up watching Bewitched, which is the original source material, isn't it? I first became aware of Mad Men when I read an Amanda Marcotte piece that treated it as some sort of documentary, and that is certainly how Mad Men seems to be treated by much of the press (and much of the press has an open and assumed natural feminist biases.) But MASH was never about the Korean War and no one considered MASH a documentary about the Kore…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:46 PM
2

Oh I hope so. I always discredit statements from the opposition to anything about how successful the opposition is, how failing their opponents are. It's why I look favorably but skeptically at statements about how feminism is failing and girls are running away from it. I hope so. In this case though, She The People is constantly on the look out for how women are represented, so we couldn’t help but notice the White House’s depiction of two working women in an e-mail message they sent out Tuesda…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:24 PM
3

Okay, thank you.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:49 PM
3

I suspect it was just literally a quote from the article, and wasn't meant to be any sort of ironic, scare quote: "What Mr. King did is just awesome," wrote one Franklin Regional alumnus now at Penn State. "A great man becoming a hero when people needed him most."
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:15 AM
1

I don't mind the ban on the latter so much, though I think twitter outrage porn is marginally better than facebook outrage porn since twitter is public and global and more easily verified, and all is better than tumblr outrage porn which is just so low. But if not for /r/mr than for other groups, I still don't understand the ban on the tweets of the well known, be that Obama, Bill Gates, Miley Cyrus, Al Qaeda, or even Theo de Raadt and Bruce Schneier. I truly don't understand many of the admins …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:33 PM
4

I apologize because sometimes I need things spelled out crystal clearly. Are you saying it is still okay to casually link to a twitter account if it is clear it is not an attempt to harass the individual? Say as an example, linking to Bruce Schneier's tweets about the heart bleed bug? Or are you saying even there, what we need to do is screencap it? And by the way if you do get a chance to respond, why does reddit even allow all the tumblr (and/or facebook) links? I'd say 99% of those links are …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:16 PM
1

I am not saying you are wrong -- I honestly don't know. What you say has face validity, I can see how shitlord might be a gay slur. Urban Dictionary doesn't seem to think so -- none of their shitlord definitions mention its use as a gay insult -- the closest they get is referencing gaylord. I am wondering (honestly just curious) if you can back up your claim -- I have only heard it used as a feminist slur against men.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:09 PM
-21

It's easy. Do the reading. When you know the answer come back. You will have then made up for the disrespect you have shown us today.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:09 PM
-41

/r/fuckoffanddiezerodaytroll
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:08 PM
1

I was never a zero day troll.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:07 PM
6

Good, enjoy them. Enjoy the TERFS, enjoy the intersectionalists who will tell you a rich white woman suffers more than you do. Enjoy them all that will put your needs at the bottom of the list, demand you pay fealty to them, and still explain that you are a likely rapist that needs to cross the street at night to make them feel safe. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:04 PM
2

No one likes zero day trolls, not even their dog shit parents.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:04 PM
5

When you are new to a movement, you just don't barge in and demand they answer your questions on how they are relevant to you. You read, you learn, you ask a question here or there, you participate, you respect the community. You don't know the basics of the men's movement or the issues. You came in here to make some point and have a cheap laugh. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:03 PM
0

Feminism consists of a bunch of trolls so I can understand your affinity with that group, zero day troll.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:50 PM
0

Good. Enjoy the feminism.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:49 PM
3

Fuck off. And when you're done fucking off, fuck off some more.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:49 PM
3

Namely that they have zero day trolls like you exploiting them and appropriating their issues in order to cheaply try to create dissension in other groups. That's a huge problems the disadvantaged face. Assholes like you.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:48 PM
5

No, zero day trolls are rarely welcome.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:46 PM
-18

Zero day troll, since you've done the reading, zero day troll, can you tell me which MRA leaders are gay men (there are several so this is a pretty easy question.)
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:46 PM
-37

You are a zero day troll. You have shown no sensitivity to us, no knowledge of what we stand for, no solidarity with us. You want us to jump through some hoop of yours. You are a zero day troll.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:44 PM
3

Can't I be like I am reclaiming shitlord!?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:35 PM
8

Not even as satire against the concept? It's got it's own Urban Dictionary definition that pretty much mocks the concept: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shitlord http://i.imgur.com/lZMenzF.jpg
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:57 PM
1

Yeah, I thought the whole piece was pretty interesting, and was glad to see the comparison you quoted, and the comparison you just offered. I guess there are two birth control options for men, condoms which are obnoxious and fail, and vasectomy which is disturbingly permanent, not always successful to reverse, and still can fail.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:44 PM
2

Give her a week and she'll cry that the hate she received in return is misogyny.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:39 PM
3

Last night rightsbot paid my bar tab and then gave me a handy. So it got an upvote (though this morning my pecker is a bit chafed and sore.)
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:57 PM
6

And it looks like he was in jail for as much as 19 of those 30 years.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:50 AM
2

Regardless, search amr or any feminist forum to see how they consider any use of the word female as a noun. It's something they think only MRA shitlords do.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:31 PM
4

Do you have a law school on campus? Get some law students to examine if this is a violation of Title IX.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:16 PM
2

I am pretty sure our feminist friends and amr bffs will have a shit fit at this poster that uses "males" instead of "men". http://i.imgur.com/MdSayvC.jpg MAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEESSSSS!
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:15 PM
3

See a lawyer, and hey, possession is 99/100th of the law in setting custody. If you want to see your child after the divorce do not your child out of your sight now. When the judge comes to determining custody, your ex and her lawyer will say that during the separation period she cared for the kid and took the kid to school and the doctor etc. And then the judge will give you almost nothing. YOU as the father want to tell the judge, during the separation I took care of the kid, I took the kid to…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:05 AM
1

Comedy and TV shows are different, there they are entertainers who jokes might offend some, but entertain others. Yes, their speech is licensed comedy thank god! Southwest has no business cracking wise during their briefings, especially since they have not passed the requisite courses in intersectionality, feminism, and triggering comedy. You must choose, but choose wisely.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:57 AM
4

In Canadian years.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:36 PM
3

Yes, I think you should picket southwest and all private entities including comedians who tell jokes based on sex. CancelSouthwest
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:09 PM
1

Would you believe I submitted it correctly, but that reddit's April Fool's day code messed it up later?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:56 PM
1

OP messed up the title. Stupid OP. I know him personally, he thought he even double checked it. I'd blame the vodka, but I've been dry for a week.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:55 PM
0

This is Times Square. Europe got hottie FEMEN, US got fatty and seriously butt ugly FEMEN. Yuck, would not hit.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:04 AM
-3

I don't get it. The concept of sexism may be invariant of feminism, but that has nothing to do with the article itself which can certainly be part of a portal on feminism. It's certainly the case that people learn about sexism in the context of feminism. Stop being a twat.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:34 PM
0

Hey Identityentity, Please learn how to Reddit, or else Learn how to Troll Better source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tkzc983aE0
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:26 PM
2

Apparently it is. I was under the impression, just because so many bots do, that bots self-identified. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:16 PM
1

alright then.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:23 AM
3

That NP article is great stuff.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:36 PM
1

I think that's just an extreme example. I for one am confident that a Ph.D biology professor discussing evolution and the origin of species can easily knock down creationist claims. Science ain't that weak it can't entertain questions, in fact, it even gets stronger by having a bit of fun explicitly taking contrary positions and seeing where they lay. Right now, self-proclaimed skeptical atheist feminists are having a field day on twitter by snarkily proposing things they feel could never be up …
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:07 AM
3

If you have a twitter or facebook account, consider sharing it.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:09 AM
1

Technically the pro-lifer group needed permission from the University to display graphic imagery, Can you expand on that? I went to UC Berkeley in the late 90s and don't know of any speech restrictions like that on campus. No free speech zones. No permission needed to hand out flyers. Of course, Berkeley then (?) still remembered it was the home of free speech. I don't agree with how she went about it, but I'm glad she did it This makes no sense.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:22 AM
3

Yes, I see nothing wrong with the posters per se, but the use of the logos indicating endorsement is going to create more hassles then they need, if only because, in the US at least, that would cause confusion with the "market" of the original logo owner. However, and I ain't no lawyer, I could believe that in the US the use of official logos might be used in certain contexts create an interesting first amendment conundrum over political speech.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:37 AM
10

And certainly a two party consent state, demonstrating once more why two party consent is asinine.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:34 AM
1

Yeah, penultimate's a killer for me. Another two that always send me to google are "secular" and "non-secular".
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:57 PM
1

sorry to be that guy, but are you sure you meant "dearth"?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:48 PM
2

There's no chance at all it's a poe. The website has dozens of articles just like this, several defending Miller-Young. And the authors of the articles are all googleable to various University women's studies programs and long CVs and descriptions confirming this ain't no poe.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:37 AM
4

Did you see where I wrote "I will reveal my bias"? That's because I know I am biased and why I try to be open about different sources and even disagreements with me. Are you aware of all of your biases? Or are you part of the great populous that never has any biases, it's the otehr folks who are biased? Anyway, whatever dude.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:52 PM
1

Whoops, thanks. Sorry about that. I have the link wrong to this post. There were several posts from thefeministwire defending Dr. Miller-Young, this post should point here: http://thefeministwire.com/2014/03/miller-young-toward-decriminalization/ so you know, I will probably delete this thread and redo it with the link fixed.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:35 PM
35

Goddamn it, I wish people here would stop saying "it's not men's rights but...." I'd prefer not to see repeat articles whines that someone on tumblr or facebook or twitter was mean to them gifs and memes But a discussion of how feminists operate is CERTAINLY a men's rights issue if only so we understand what feminists actually say what feminists claim to want feminist theory in general how the media and society AND law are impacted by feminists how the media and society AND law is mediated throu…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:41 PM
10

At UCB, in the 90s, I regularly had to "run the gauntlet" of Palestinian supporters flying all sorts of posters with graphic imagery on them and quite a few anti-semitic slurs to get to campus. #WeSurvived
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:09 PM
8

http://thefeministwire.com/2014/03/mireille-miller-young/ This guy is a professor "Prof in the Crit, Culture, Gender & Race Studies at WSU. " who writes a long column defending Miller-Young because she was taking a stand against "the hard right" without ever mentioning what she actually did or how it was a crime or how there were better ways. I have no doubt though that in the rest of his life, Professor Leonard is a peace and free speech advocate.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:19 PM
2

The answer to ugly speech is more speech. Not violence. Over the years protesters have shown us all sorts of ways that Westboro Baptist Churches ugly speech could be effectively rebutted, and in the end WBC lost.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:02 PM
1

Not to mention how so many pro-choice feminists these days are so pro-choice they are even pro-choice for sex selection, which almost always hurts women more.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:38 PM
3

If it's WILL BE entering and not has entered, I would contact the US Border Patrol. Alert them to the name of the child as it appears on his or her passport (or other entry papers.) The US Customs and Border Patrol appears very sensitive to child trafficking. It would probably help if you have a lawyer send the letter, and notarize it, and make sure it says the father does not give permission for the child to enter the US. source: the two hour hassle I was given at the Canadian/Washington Border…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:53 PM
1

You dumb cunt, I still haven't called her a bitch.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:57 PM
2

She still falls back on the claim it's fair use and okay because she is non-profit. What she should have done, and should have started doing immediately is building up a credits page and thanking all of the artists whose works she has used. I find this claim interesting: Finally, the Tropes vs Women project is a nonprofit endeavor. We never place ads on any of our episodes and always make our videos available for free to everyone on YouTube. For those that may be interested, Feminist Frequency i…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:56 PM
3

CowKitty issued a C&D based on the incorrect assumption that you need to be a 501(c)3 Non-Profit Organization in order to claim a fair use defense. First, though you and CK call it a C&D, I am not aware at her site of any posting of anything that looks like a C&D, so what do you believe she is talking about? I think she is referring to this: http://cowkitty.net/post/78808973663/you-stole-my-artwork-an-open-letter-to-anita It's not totally clear that CowKitty views 501(c)(3) as the LEGAL STANDARD…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:34 PM
2

It's arguable whether CowKitty's art was transformative, but that's actually a separate issue from fair use entirely. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Derivative_work Even if a work is found to be an unauthorized derivative work, an alleged infringer can escape liability via the defense of fair use. For example, in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., the Supreme Court found that although a parody of the song "Oh, Pretty Woman" by 2 Live Crew was an unauthorized derivative work, fair use…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:48 PM
18

Art when transformative can fall under fair use and so does not violate copyright. An infringement of copyright by CowKitty of the original art is completely separate to the issue of whether Sarkeesian infringed CowKitty's copyright. If CowKitty infringed an artist's copyright, it is most likely the case Sarkeesian infringed on BOTH CowKitty's copyright AND that artist's copyright. Sarkeesian's representative (if not Sarkeesian herself) claimed their being a non-profit meant their infringement o…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:24 PM
18

Sarkeesian may say mean things about us, but this is not a men's rights issue. Feminists may say mean things about us, The Media may say mean things about us, Teachers may say mean things about us, Legislators may say mean things about us, Judges may say mean things about us, Mothers may say mean things about us, Society may say mean things about us, but this is not a men's rights issue... Sarkeesian's kickstarter, which makes phony claims about men and the gaming industry and presents it in a m…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:12 PM
10

Yo, I certainly haven't called her a bitch, bitch.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:10 PM
20

CowKitty was the master of the powerful tactic of "being correct on all the issues". Regarding your name, honestly, I don't know what you mean when you write that. But when I see the name Geiger, and no offense, I can only think of the middle-aged, overweight, pornographer blackmailer that set up Carmen Sternwood! I think we can all agree his killing was necessary and good!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:12 PM
5

Interesting catch by Professor Althouse's husband Meade.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:13 PM
2

I'd say more "liberal-hippie" than social justice. As for anti-mra, not really. Yeah. I think we're going to disagree on this. that doesn't actually change the fact that you're stretching things in your depiction. this too.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:52 PM
2

You understand it's a very social justice oriented anti-mra comic?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:16 PM
2

Are you at all familiar with this comic strip?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:03 PM
3

So you're some sort of bad guy, and you've been stopped by Vagina Dentata Girl, and she is wearing her uniform, and because of her uniform you know who she is Super Dentata Girl and that her vagina has teeth that cuts of penises, and she says, "niggelprease, let's fuck", and you say, sure, and then she mounts you and then she cuts off your penis and you're right what was I thinking that she would have to rape you?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:42 PM
0

The graphic says: If the Enliven Project and Paul Pierson are dishonest in their charts what else are they dishonest about? This gives me the impression that the maker of this graphic finds the overall graphic was accurate, and can only complain that the pixels on the "little people" were dishonest and uses that as a way to sully the entire graphic from the Enliven Project. But the overall graphic from the Enliven Project was incredibly dishonest! There is tons and tons wrong with it that is muc…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:37 PM
3

Imgur of cartoon in case Tatsuya pulls it: http://i.imgur.com/IHEeGFt.jpg I wonder how long it will be before feminists denounce it.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:03 AM
6

The entire graphic was debunked months and months ago. I wouldn't bother counting pixels.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:35 AM
4

She had a role as designer, apparently. I think she could arguably be given a title as engineer, ... (though I have to grate my teeth to say so.)
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:51 PM
7

The Human Stain Thanks Swan, that's interesting. From your description, I note the book is available from Amazon for as little as a penny + shipping, and there's also a movie available from netflix DVD, or from Amazon or Google for rental.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:54 AM
2

fwiw, avfm and reddit mr did publish at about that time an accusation naming a woman who was supposedly an admissions officer at an east coast university who had admitted to discriminating against men. I won't say more about that due to reddit's doxing policy, but the article is still up at reddit, and to the best of my knowledge it's been admitted that the real world woman so named is not the woman making the admission. (IIRC, I believe it was a malicious, false accusation). Now, was anyone fro…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:09 AM
1

I want to get on their level and keeping our eye on the ball is necessary to do that. Yeah, I have no fucking clue as to what getting on their level means. Are you referring to #banbossy where they act like idiots and assholes and get loads of great press for that? Is this the higher level we need to achieve in this subreddit before you can remove your tampon?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:13 PM
7

I'm sorry, you left out your resume of your fantastic activism on reddit. Yes, there are a lot of low cost posts. And yes, sometimes posts have minimal relevance to men's rights. The culture is largely driven by all sorts of claims of feminists that are bullshit. It is not unworthy to demonstrate that bullshit. It helps support mens issues at other times when we've all had a good laugh at the feminist bullshit in other areas. Seriously if this if fuck all good time stuff then we'll only have peo…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:27 AM
8

I have been told by feminists that a world of feminist influence including feminist bosses will be peace and unicorns. This piece shows that as men and non feminists acknowledge, that claims is full of shit. Okay activist, I am all ears, tell me of your activism on reddit.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:07 AM
15

Mens Rights Issue: This woman discovers that most people have jobs not careers and that feminists are mainly concerned with the few people who have careers, not the majority of people who have jobs. Also, it turns out that having a pussy doesn't make you an enlightened manager that farts unicorns while #SmashingPatriarchy. You can still be a dick, an asshole, a jackass, a bitch, a cunt.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:36 PM
3

Yeah. It's even worse if you have any experience with Tracy Clark Flory and Salon. She is giving us her advice on what works for marriage -- she has been married a little for six months. http://www.salon.com/2013/07/21/i_was_supposed_to_end_up_alone/ She is the Salon sex columnist, but it's clear from her Broadsheet columns she was never terribly knowledgeable about sex. She gives advice to women to have lots of hookup sex ... and to expect that sex to be bad and to fake orgasms. (No wonder she …
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter