TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jplayer01 Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by jplayer01 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

dromflogy You're using that word wrong.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:15 AM
3

women when it comes to responsibility for consent, but it's because more often than not (and we're talking way more often here), say a young college male is much more likely to take advantage of an intoxicated, confused or weaker woman than vice versa You're buying into this world view where men are primarily sexual predators. The problem with this messaging is that it revolves around the idea that only women need to give consent and that if there is alcohol involved, only the woman is unable to…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:28 AM
3

No consent lessons in health classes teach that it's the man's job. It's everywhere. It's often not stated explicitly, but it's how men are treated by law in many places. How they're treated in universities when the topic is sexual harassment/abuse and alcohol. I see it all the time. Plenty of women go to jail for false rape accusations Certainly not enough. Men's live go destroyed, while most of them go free. Mattress girl is still this symbol of female empowerment, but she lied about fucking e…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:12 AM
3

if you don't acknowledge that women are suffering emotionally and physically at the hands of some men who believe they have But we do, for fuck's sake. It is a problem and nobody, not even MRA's, this supposedly misogynistic bunch, denies that rape is a problem. It's women (and a lot of men) that completely deny that men could ever be raped and that it doesn't make sense to talk about men being raped. It's women trying to shut down men's shelters or complaining that it's wasted resources on the …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:05 AM
2

But "men's rights" is not a hate movement, it's a responsive movement, and I think most feminists can see that, is what I'm trying to say. If there are valid issues that need to be addressed, it doesn't matter where the MRA movement came from. Men are tired of being walked all over because they're men by women who supposedly care for equal rights and by women who eagerly suppress men's point of views and any organizations or anything else that try to help or inform men. When women stop focusing …
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:53 PM
1

After talking to a number of Australian feminists, some of them friends, it seems to me like MRA's are just generally reviled. No idea who you're talking to, because from my contact, I have to seriously doubt "the majority of feminists" are in any way on our side.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:12 PM
1

a Master's degree and two Bachelor's What fields?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:42 AM
0

rofl
/r/MensRights06/11/17 08:35 PM
1

Talk to your fellow feminists about it. I don't care what you think feminists should be or what the official definition is. There are a fuckton of feminists who are more interested in pushing female privilege than any sense of equality.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:52 PM
1

No, they're feminists. They call themselves feminists. They identify themselves as feminists. Go to xxchromosomes or any of the female-oriented subs, they're everywhere. That they're misandrists is obvious, but they're feminists.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 12:17 PM
1

Then you haven't had any discussions with feminists about men. I've had plenty, and consistently I've been categorized as this horrible, entitled, privileged human being that doesn't deserve to breath the same air.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 12:09 PM
1

Maybe take a closer look at what your fellow feminists say about men. This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to disgusting things I've had said about me and my 'kind'.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:01 AM
2

Didn't we already get mad about this a few months ago?
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:00 AM
1

This has been the case since the 70s. It's not new, it's just become incredibly common and easy to see with the internet in recent years.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:55 PM
3

Other feminists hire them.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:54 PM
2

smug men smug people, but okay, let's make this about gender, because we all need more retarded shit to argue about.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:52 PM
3

This is one of the few cases where you should investigate the spouse, whether male or female.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:35 AM
1

My experience is that being aware of flaws isn't nearly enough, or necessarily a healthy point of view to take. I was aware of all the flaws in my ex, doesn't change how much I loved her or how strongly I still feel a connection to her. Accepting a flaws as being a part of that person is a part of any healthy relationship or even daily human contact.
/r/seduction17/08/17 01:23 AM
2

Different perspectives are always welcome. You don't have to leave just because you don't fit into the usual mold here.
/r/seduction16/08/17 11:24 PM
2

Camille Paglia has written some great stuff about how the feminist movement turned to shit after the 70s.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:34 PM
1

It's an observation meant to peddle to a certain demographic. It's clearly an appeal to feminists where none is warranted. Just because something is true doesn't mean it makes sense to mention it in a certain context. You seem to misunderstand how media works and what kind of influence it has. Media is all about shaping narratives. This author has chosen that feminism is always relevant in every context, when it isn't here. It's like the whole media bullshit about Hillary and her email server. Y…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:16 PM
1

I don't care about Breitbart. I've seen the source article. It's just baffling that the author thinks it's in any way relevant.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:15 PM
1

And then the feminists whine that, of course, the woman is there in a bit part and doesn't do anything important. See Hackridge Saw.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:35 PM
1

It's seriously pathetic in the realm of things to whine about No, it isn't. You don't seem to realize what effect enabling blind feminism has, even in such 'innocuous' statements. It speaks to a certain acceptance that a movie should be villified based on this kind of detail. Meanwhile, in the real world, people are expected to get a grip when they encounter certain things or details they might not like.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:34 PM
3

Because it isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:33 PM
-3

He does point out that that there basically no women and minorities, but not in a negative way. Not sure how you can say that or why it's appropriate he points it out at all.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:25 PM
–

But at what point is it appropriate to point out the lack of women in this kind of movie? It's completely beside the point.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:24 PM
–

Doesn't need to be a feminist rant. It, for some reason, thinks it's appropriate to point out there aren't any women lead roles in a scenario where only men went to war and died to protect their country, including women and children. Is there a word like whitewashing that applies to ignoring the lengths men have gone to in order to protect their communities?
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:23 PM
13

Yeah, it sucks. It's not just women though.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:09 PM
5

I prefer equalist. I like the term 'humanist' myself, though it already has a certain meaning in philosophy.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:01 PM
2

Female only participants does not necessitate female only instructors. 1 or 2 instructors for 10-30 students is not nearly enough to give proper practice of the techniques against appropriate opponents. In fact, anything approaching "sparring" in a mixed group in a 2-day course would be irresponsible and dangerous. No sparring = worthless training. And no, it wouldn't be irresponsible and dangerous. It's simply a matter of showing a technique and letting them practice it.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:55 PM
6

It's probably women only because it was DESIGNED FOR WOMEN. That's bullshit. You can't train techniques that would actually help you against stronger/bigger men if you don't actually spar with stronger/bigger men. And not all men are giants, plenty of us are fairly small and consequently relatively weak, such that we need to learn the same techniques if we want to stand a chance against the kind of people who would probably attack us on the streets.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:53 PM
8

Not so sure about that. I did Wing Chun for a couple of years, and absolute strength simply didn't matter all that much. I think what's important is the techniques you learn and practicing them against opponents who are much bigger/stronger than you.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:47 PM
1

Seems terrible that women aren't training with/against men in a class like this on a practical basis alone. I learned a lot sparring with guys who were a lot larger than me, even as a guy myself.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:33 PM
4

His comment was based on her choice of career which shows clear indications as to her familial history. While she might have valid arguments (she doesn't), you can add a certain value of trustworthiness and reliability of a source (person) depending on circumstances like the fact she most likely never had a healthy relationship with her father/parents/family/etc. Consequently, she probably has little to no knowledge of what a healthy such relationship might look like and how beneficial it is. Th…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:29 PM
5

His point is valid, even if he stated it very crassly.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:35 PM
7

It doesn't.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:36 AM
3

Decent article until it reaches the part about how climate change is a political issue, and not a scientific or existential one.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:25 AM
-1

No matter how often you say this, it doesn't make your statement true. In the face of real cultural issues with rape and unwanted groping, what do you expect an airline to do? Single-handedly fix the culture that they're in? No. This is a stop-gap solution to protect female passengers while the larger society figures out how to deal with this shit.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 07:11 AM
1

Obviously, there'd be a lot more rape if more teachers were male.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:16 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:03 PM
16

Does this matter when it can be repealed 10 years down the line, then applied retroactively? I still wouldn't feel safe at all.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:04 AM
11

"my car wouldn't start so I murdered a cat." You wouldn't believe how often this happens to me. Just the other day ...
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:19 AM
12

They're all rapists and pedophiles. How are you supposed to talk to men as a vulnerable young woman?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:49 PM
12

men are reluctant to let a doctor near their genitals with a needle and syringe Which is weird because I'd consider hormonal treatment to be the nuclear option compared to something like Vasalgel.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:30 PM
2

If somebody says stop, then sure, it's possibly non-consensual. But that isn't what's being discussed here.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:33 AM
1

As much as I like the article, I'm a bit concerned with her final sentence about how it was all about facilitating communication anyway, so whatever. Which really isn't what enthusiastic consent is about.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:31 AM
6

She's still getting half of everything, if not more.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 05:02 PM
1

The system as it is now needs constant growth. Debt is just a means to that end.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:14 PM
0

... no. That's not the problem. But keep peddling your shit, whatever.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:13 PM
4

At this point I'm not sure I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, considering the way they treat people who they believe have slighted them.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:01 AM
2

What the fuck. And his siblings knew.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 09:11 AM
1

Well-written article
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:15 AM
1

I agree. I just thought there would be more to his argument. I believe there's a certain measure of implied and permanent consent until revoked in a relationship.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:20 AM
1

What does he mean by technically impossible?
/r/MensRights24/10/16 09:16 AM
27

When will they think of the children?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:57 PM
2

You're literally a shining beacon of hope. I'm glad you posted here.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:33 PM
2

Wow, that fills me with just the tiniest bit of hope.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:32 PM
2

That's ... pretty damn amazing.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:31 PM
-2

...this is Saudi Arabia. I'm not sure this is a mens rights issue, much less anything we should be using as 'proof' for anything in the US or Europe.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:24 AM
6

But a dozen examples of a guy being slapped is fine...
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:57 AM
0

Good point.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:17 AM
4

Plenty of people also liked Twilight, not sure that's a great measure of a movie's quality ...
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:22 PM
3

Number 41 hits me the closest. :/ I don't even remember the last time I was hugged. Oh, wait, my last ex, years ago.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:54 PM
2

Is there a video?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:29 AM
1

Please teach me, sensei.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:03 PM
1

but a woman can't do that And people wonder why critics of Ghostbusters are considered neckbeard losers.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 12:32 PM
1

This time There were times when she was?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:15 PM
5

+++Raven She defends men the entire time while the other women spend the entire dumping on them. Also, the poor guy they picked out to comment on what Gosling said (women the better gender, more evolved, etc., etc.) ... you can see he thinks they're full of shit, but he's not going to say it when the entire audience is mostly women who are so supportive of what they're saying. But where's this stuff coming from about how 'women are the better sex'? Why is Gosling of all people saying it? Why are…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:09 PM
8

Just outright deleting an article and putting NOTHING in its place doesn't contribute anything. If what is there is patently false and nothing but unsubstantiated garbage, then deleting it is a productive contribution to the page. Factual information can be added afterwards if necessary, but if we had to first write an entire section before removing shit to replace it, we'd never get anything done.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:10 AM
3

Possibly. I'm not entirely convinced that there aren't parents who can be just as biased and misandrist in this regard. Personally, I'm not a parent (and don't plan to ever be one) and while I thought the picture was a bit odd at first, I didn't experience any horror or thoughts of pedophilia. But then again, I'm quite aware of mens' rights issues and how discriminated men can be as parents.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 06:38 AM
4

... I couldn't get through this video. What a jack-ass.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:12 AM
4

She is eventually murdered ... what? Where does she live? Somalia?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:38 AM
0

I'd say hide it in the post. This is the kind of shit that doesn't need to be visible on my feed. :/
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:22 PM
21

Mfw not being a push-over and not tolerating rude behavior means you're literally sexist.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:59 PM
-8

Beginning to feel like this subreddit has begun the long journey towards turning into TheRedPill and that saddens me because I simply don't hate women. As much as I don't like Rey because of how she's written, it's indefensible to say the movie itself is a mere feminist circlejerk because of her inclusion. edit: Rofl, all the downvotes. I think I'm in the wrong subreddit, because suddenly everything is feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:39 AM
1

.... it's not all-female though.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:55 PM
12

... apart from Ghostbusters, when has there ever been an all-female reboot? Wtf?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:34 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:31 PM
3

I have same impression. It's used among my male friends when somebody just says something ... inappropriate or something nobody wants to know. How is this sexist?
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:18 AM
1

Activists have also noted that the footage the authorities have released so far is incomplete, offering the possibility that something happened to provoke the young women into a physical confrontation before the videos begin. ... you've got to be kidding me.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:44 AM
1

Why self-loathing?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:56 PM
-1

That could be a part of it. Probably also just tired of old white men starting ridiculous wars over bullshit or ... etc., etc., etc.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:46 PM
-2

The world is run by old white men. I'm not a feminist and I actually wouldn't have a problem with this.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:38 PM
2

Brilliant post. His further comments below are great too.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:16 PM
1

To be fair, this extract basically mirrors the public consensus on how things are and "should be". Men pursuing women. Not sure why you need proof.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:11 PM
2

Also a good point, thanks.
/r/seduction23/05/14 08:35 AM
5

I've had arguments about this. There's this sense that pick-up artists manipulate women just to have sex ... and that's true in a very twisted sort of way, but that's not the whole story. It infuriates me because there are genuinely a whole bunch of guys who simply want to connect with women on an emotional level and have sex. Neither of which they should feel ashamed for.
/r/seduction23/05/14 12:18 AM
1

I'm not so sure about the poster. It seemed like the wording was more of resignation. Otherwise, I agree with everything else you said. I'm one of those poor souls who's caught up in that soul mate crap and I see how it's made previous relationships so much more difficult. Problem is, old habits die hard. It's hard to break out of that kind of thinking and it's something I struggle with day to day.
/r/seduction13/01/14 04:08 PM
9

It slightly confused me. Usually this reddit is so ... "don't despair, put in the work and you'll be able to meet great babes and pick and choose who you want to be with". I completely disagree with the sentiment in the first post. Life doesn't owe us shit and it's up to us to earn what we want.
/r/seduction12/01/14 09:33 PM
2

Agreed. Just break up, create drama, give silent treatment until you get your way or do a bunch of crap you'll regret. Forget about communication and figuring shit out.
/r/seduction08/09/13 02:44 AM
8

I agree. Movies and TV series were the main influences on what I believed a relationship (as well as the pre-relationship courting) should be like. Nobody ever told me that it doesn't work any way like that, leading to a very skewed view that has in the past only helped make my life very difficult.
/r/seduction07/09/13 11:24 PM
55

He was too busy approaching a girl.
/r/seduction25/02/13 11:31 PM
3

... I guess I somehow missed that.
/r/seduction25/02/13 03:58 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're trying to say with this. What subreddit should he visit instead and in what way does this subreddit clash with his ideals?
/r/seduction25/02/13 10:26 AM
4

What went wrong?
/r/seduction25/02/13 10:25 AM
6

So, as a new guy, what should my goal be instead of attraction?
/r/seduction25/02/13 10:24 AM
9

Agreed. Find a good beginner strength program that focuses on compound exercises (Starting Strength or StrongLift) and stick with it until you don't make any progress anymore.
/r/seduction09/02/13 12:08 PM
21

Unfortunately, yes ...
/r/seduction09/02/13 11:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter