TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jslnk Archive

View 1 posts and 289 comments by jslnk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Legal Rightsjslnk/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

It strikes me as funny that you’d make a point about “ignoring the fact that men can be loving parents and spouses too” and then go all Reeeee! they expect me to protect and provide for a woman!!! If you think being a wage/tax slave is the only way you offer value, I’d say you have some personal growth to undergo. If you think men don’t have unique strengths and abilities that give them significant advantages in dangerous and fast-moving situations, you might be the next trans-woman gold medal w…
/r/MensRights01/11/21 03:01 PM
3

I think you both are saying the same thing and getting tripped up on a double negative (less averse) or possibly just a typo in the original comment. Men take more risks. It comes with testosterone.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 02:17 PM
3

Yeah, this question seems like bait. Put out a unrelated question about a hot-button topic and wait for an unhinged response. Perfect recipe for getting a sub shut down.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 01:24 AM
1

“Empathy” was one of the breakdown categories in the EQ test we took. It was the only category where we differed significantly and was clearly written from the perspective that female-typical behaviors were the gold standard. Even my wife saw that after it was pointed out.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 11:11 PM
6

The word “empathy” has been redefined to mean “enable”. When a man tells a friend, “Damn, dude, you really eff’ed that up!” it’s empathetic if he can relate to the underlying emotion, but it’s not seen as empathy because it isn’t validating. Even if we’re busting his chops for a moronic move, there’s a certain level shared understanding between men of the underlying embarrassment. Women, on the other hand, rely more often on messages of empowerment which skirt the underlying emotion. “You’re bet…
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:31 PM
14

You’re thinking that it needs to be an organized, orderly and structured burning. It’s doesn’t. It can be seen in school shootings, crime waves, deteriorating cities, and many of the other ills of society that the mainstream media likes to blame on “domestic extremists” in order to cover the fact that it’s a rampant problem predicated on the progressive idea that government can (and should) dictate human nature to its own ends. You’re right, it will look like destroyed social cohesion. We’re alr…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:15 PM
69

“The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel it’s warmth.” - African proverb They’re not wrong. The question is: what is a society that is more concerned that a woman was interrupted in a meeting than in the real struggles of men going to do about it? The answer is most likely - keep kicking that dog and then act shocked when it turns and bites.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:32 PM
23

Unfortunately, this happens all too often. We don’t need a #BelieveWomen campaign because that is the default. Once a woman starts spreading lies, it’s really hard to recover. I’m not sure what to tell you except to suggest you transfer to a different school far away and try to start over. Be careful about who you share your whereabouts with.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 11:34 PM
51

I’ve been in a lot of locker rooms. The only “talk” is about golf. It’s women’s self-centered nature that makes them think that any time men are alone, we’re talking about them. Not so. And the fantasy of “toxic masculinity” goes WELL beyond the one aspect you dislike. It includes such gems as “men are not in touch with their emotions” which is nothing more than the feminists denying that men HAVE emotions. The only time I ever hear “boys will be boys” is when educators are making excuses for wh…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 01:51 PM
117

If “toxic masculinity” is real, feminists are the biggest purveyors.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:10 PM
5

Half of the stuff listed doesn’t ‘need’ to be done.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 10:37 PM
1

Focus.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:03 AM
-7

Dying is a privilege when the alternative is living as a woman 🙄
/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:43 PM
1

Exactly. Who wants to strut around peacocking because they’re a “bargain”?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:53 PM
1

“Should” being the operative word. But if your cost goes up, your overall productivity declines because each unit of production costs more than before.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:27 PM
1

Productivity is an absolutely bizarre metric to toot your horn about.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:21 PM
32

More than 200 studies would refute that. The article simply shows that men are less likely to report. https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:54 PM
7

Maybe they should send a paddy wagon to a few university Gender Studies classes and round up a few more female “volunteers”. For equality.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:47 PM
4

PSA bout that PSA test: Your doctor probably didn’t tell you this, but ejaculation can falsely elevate PSA test results for up to 24 hours. I asked the nurse practitioner why they didn’t include that information in the pre-checkup instructions and she basically said they were too embarrassed to talk to their patients about sex. She said if the test comes back high, the schedule a second test and cover that info then. JFC
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:05 PM
16

Forcing others to pay for your childcare isn’t about the right to choose - it’s about the right to avoid responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:35 PM
15

I’m gonna go WAY out on a limb here and assume that if she was in a bar, she’s telling everyone she was 21. Probably has an ID to prove it.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:10 PM
6

Interesting that they choose 50 as the age. Sounds more like post-menopausal women are upset that older men can still land a younger woman.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:10 PM
1

Thanks. I’ve seen Cordell’s pieces in a few places. He’s got a lot of good impact analysis, but a little short on rigorous studies. The SAVE article mentions a few studies, but no links.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 05:22 PM
5

Especially since men aren’t even the primary perpetrators of domestic violence. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Murray_Straus/publication/228350210_Gender_symmetry_in_partner_violence_The_evidence_the_denial_and_the_implications_for_primary_prevention_and_treatment/links/54ef34d60cf2432ba65626c4/Gender-symmetry-in-partner-violence-The-evidence-the-denial-and-the-implications-for-primary-prevention-and-treatment.pdf?origin=publication_detail
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:26 PM
1

‘“Who Cooked The Last Supper” is about how women throughout history provided critical services so men could have leisure time.’ “Leisure time” is an odd way to frame being nailed to a cross. Men’s sacrifices never count.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:40 AM
45

No more brutal than the reaction I received when I foolishly thought #MeToo was about giving a voice to victims of sexual assault. Trying to share my story just got a slew of, “WOMEN are talking now. You need to shut up and LISTEN!”
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 01:19 AM
1

Your sarcasm (I hope) is falling flat.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 12:57 AM
2

Sounds like something a Russian agent would say...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 05:02 AM
1

And when presented with a case they claim is “patriarchy”, they laugh it off instead of fighting it like they say the do.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 05:45 AM
2

Let’s be honest. Margaret Atwood wrote a better-than-average pulp romance novel. It’s more soft-core porn than political commentary. Just Google “women’s sexual fantasies”. It’s all right there. She nailed her market.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 05:40 AM
4

Oh really??? How’s that working out?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:47 PM
1

Left-wing/right-wing are just two sides to the same authoritarian coin. The only difference is who gets to decide the winners. The “wing” isn’t the problem; the overreaching government of both stripes is the problem.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 07:29 AM
1

We’re not fighting for the same thing and until you become the head of NOW, your soft-core definition of feminism doesn’t matter. Here’s a nice example of how feminism works. When you become the leader of a major feminist organization, you can set the tone. Until then, feminism is what feminism does. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/no-country-for-burly-men
/r/MensRights09/01/20 07:14 AM
18

Honestly, ladies, most of you are downright unf**kable. Don’t flatter yourselves.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 07:03 AM
19

She’s not entirely off base. Women practice the art of social control from early childhood. They learn early that crying and big, woeful eyes gets them whatever they want from their parents. It reaches its peak in middle school in what’s known as “relational aggression” where skills such as gossiping, backstabbing, and social isolation are honed. It’s during this phase that the power of “victimhood” reveals itself. So yes, women do apologies differently and quite often take great pains to show e…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 11:01 AM
1

Cool. I absolutely believe every man should choose for himself how he wants to live his life. The problem is, too many are taking the path of least resistance and not even doing the basic work of asking themselves honestly what that looks like. They go with the flow - do what mommy/girlfriend/wife/society tells them because they’d rather avoid conflict than see themselves as human beings who’s needs are every bit as important as anybody else’s. It’s the “nice guy” syndrome. They think by never c…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 11:18 PM
1

90% of the concern trolling on the Internet is designed to convince you to never amount to anything more than the OP. Men need to be challenging each other and ourselves to be better each day. Name calling (incel, beta, cuck) isn’t helping. Neither is excusing mediocrity. Those men who’ve earned those names too often have traded their own sovereignty for a feminist ideal. It doesn’t serve them, or anyone around them. There is no virtue in just going through the motions. We’ve allowed ourselves t…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:12 PM
10

Because if you accept the premise of “equality”, there’s no logical argument. So they turn to emotional arguments to maintain their privilege.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:40 PM
4

Drafting women is a great way to reverse our falling birth rate because 90% of them will get pregnant within 24 hours of having their number called.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:22 PM
1

Yeah. Half the population doesn’t pay taxes and another half believes they’re entitled to protection because vagina. You sound like Greta screeching “how DARE you!” Gotta keep up the moral outrage in case the plebs start questioning the sacrifices you’re demanding of them. Make a cogent argument instead of empty name calling or STFU.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:32 PM
2

Ask them for their list of published papers. Maybe “not all” are like that, but the ones calling the shots, getting published, getting interviews, and having social media impact are.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:17 PM
6

He ran in Illinois but like so many others, he left the state.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/20 05:13 AM
36

r/Sinkpissers
/r/MensRights01/01/20 11:30 PM
2

LMAO. NOBODY hates women as much as other women.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 07:48 PM
94

This is what privilege looks like.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:45 PM
5

Eugenics has always been a favorite toy of the left.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:03 PM
9

Women talking about how damage to reputation is a minor inconvenience is blind privilege. Only a creature with no reputation to speak of could say such a thing.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:18 PM
6

For once, I’d like to ask the men of this sub to think about the poor woman and how this impacts her. Not THAT one, the other one who almost had a boyfriend until this skag stepped up. You see, honey, it’s not MEN tripping you up at every step; it’s your “sisters”. The poor guy in this case was just an object in the middle of a power struggle between women. Nobody hates women as much as other women.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 05:44 PM
10

So...”boys will be boys?” Strange how the only time I ever hear this “mark of toxic masculinity” is from those trying to justify why they shouldn’t bother to help boys. It’s victim blaming.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 01:04 PM
5

It’s interesting to see the number of comments from men who are not happy and vow to leave their sons intact since we keep hearing, “I’ve never heard anyone complain!” You’re just not listening.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:25 PM
14

I saw a great video from a conservative female MP some time ago discussing this very issue (I wish I could find it again). Her conclusion: conservative women get elected because they lead from a position of strength. Liberal women fail because they approach it from a position of entitled victimhood. Nobody wants to vote for that. Seems entirely reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 04:55 PM
3

Kinda hard to fight “the objectification of women” when it’s coded into law.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 02:57 PM
2

“Angry White Male” A dude who just wants to crack open a beer, throw some burgers on the grill, and play catch with the kids in the back yard instead of working overtime and extra shifts to pay for your Medieval Russian Literature degree and sex change operation. FIFY
/r/MensRights12/12/19 02:00 PM
10

So stunning and brave high school girls can write their “research” papers.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:51 PM
14

I stand corrected, kind sir. The coffee hadn’t kicked in.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 03:54 PM
150

The outrage over the Peloton ad is fat women being angry that another woman was healthy. And a man dared to enable her.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:59 PM
5

Vagsplain it to us, Kristin.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:33 PM
1

This just tells women they’re not good enough.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 05:43 PM
6

Without knowing whether one-on-one opportunities are made for the daughter, it’s impossible to say. But the daughter does seem to be getting a lot of practice for her emotional manipulation and relational aggression skills. She’ll be a prize catch some day! The idea that every little thing with your children has to be equally split at all times is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 03:57 PM
2

This is what privilege looks like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 08:42 AM
11

Women make 80% of consumer purchases. Dudes don’t matter. Marketing targets women.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 04:56 PM
27

I had a similar incident while working retail. My brother-in-law managed a retail store and needed help for the Christmas season. I wasn’t doing anything, so why not? A female co-worker didn’t like the fact that I told her to go out on the floor and pick up some merchandise so she tries to start shit with HR & store security telling them that I had said all sorts of things about them. She didn’t realize the manager was my BIL and I was on a first-name basis with HR & security. She kept her job, …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/19 10:27 PM
1

I didn’t say that either. Hooray! We agree.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 05:45 PM
1

They don’t complain about black men. They just get their white white knights to pass laws that result in the highest incarceration rate in the world and focused heavily on black and minority men. They’ve already done to black men what they want to do to all men.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 11:47 PM
17

Yup. Victimhood is big business.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 04:20 PM
2

No..actually apologizing for something is taking responsibility. Saying “sorry” every time you interact with people is an avoidance technique. Especially when done pre-emptively. When you start an email with “sorry to bother you”, you are admitting that you are wrong to ask. Therefore, you have no responsibility for seeing the action through to the end. You gave away power in the situation so now it’s the other persons responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 03:12 PM
5

I learned everything I needed to know about “consent” when I was one day old. It is a privilege reserved for the elite.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:33 PM
-4

Saying “sorry” is just another way to avoid responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:23 PM
7

I can’t take anyone seriously who’s sole reference is AAUW - a women’s advocacy group. Take very careful note on page 7 of the full report how “earnings” suddenly turn into a “pay gap”. The two are not the same, It is well established and beyond dispute that men work more hours than women. This is one of the major differences between “pay” and “earnings”. The so-called “pay gap” even shows up in highly unionized professions such as teachers and law enforcement. In these jobs, pay is set by union…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:41 AM
8

No. We’re talking about the “women are under represented in Wikipedia edits and it’s all men’s fault”. The extra credit was just a distraction. Do try to stay on point.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:28 PM
9

They’re oppressed when they’re given no choice. They’re oppressed when they’re given a choice. The only solution is to hold a gun to women’s heads and force them to contribute. Of course, that would just be used as evidence that violence against women is common.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:42 PM
7

Most men in prison are there for drug charges. Saying that selling a little weed means you’re asking to be raped is as sick as saying wearing a tight blouse is asking to be raped. What you’re really trying to say is that men have hyper-agency and are 100% responsible for anything that happens to them while women are objects and have no control at all over what happens to them. Why do you hate women so much? Stop objectifying women.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:37 PM
12

The spin is so hard I honestly can’t figure out what her point is. She spends 3/4ths of the article bemoaning the fact that DV statistics are saturated with police and institutional bias and then concludes with the important reminder that men make up an obscenely high number of DV arrests. We’re aware of that, honey. Male victims are more likely to be arrested than receive help. Make your system fair and equitable and you’ll see that arrest ratio equalize.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:26 PM
2

Schools are as much a toxic echo chamber as social media.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:40 AM
5

And then they ask why you didn’t go to the doctor sooner.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:27 AM
2

That study is limited to two years after ADULT circumcision. Hardly conclusive for long term effects.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:18 AM
3

All women benefit from the actions of violent men.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:51 AM
67

If a man hits a woman, he’s a monster. If a woman hits a man, he must have done something to deserve it.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 08:09 PM
9

Newsflash: Women hate other women. And if you’re running around promoting the “sisterhood”, you’re probably the one they hate most.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:57 PM
2

Many states still do. It is a sure indicator to whether the practice is alive and well, or on its way out. It is the most common surgical procedure paid for by Medicaid in my state and, I assume, others. States where it is not covered see a snowball effect as the argument about “looking different in the locker room” goes away. If you want to end barbarism, start at the government funding.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:41 PM
50

Make sure you find a pediatrician who is foreskin knowledgeable. We got lucky and found one who actually testified before our states health board to end state funding of circumcision.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 01:13 PM
1

That’s not patriarchy. That’s gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 12:18 PM
1

Privilege is invisible to those who have it, ladies.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 01:25 AM
3

Sign up here, boys. r/sinkpissers
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:22 AM
27

Riiiggghhhttt. Women’s actions don’t carry consequences. If you “play around” during the prime mating years, don’t be surprised when the field is much more restricted when you decide to get off the merry-go-round a decade later. Feminism told women to wait for relationships and families until after their careers are launched. They forgot to tell “good men” they were supposed to wait too and enterprising young women snapped them all up. Good men are out there, but they’re all married and taking t…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:13 AM
1

Nobody reinforces gender stereotypes quite as hard as those who claim to oppose them.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:41 PM
15

Supporting male genital integrity is aNtiSeMetIc! Supporting female genital integrity is just human rights.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:11 PM
6

Yes. Except what she did wasn’t “avoiding men” it was erasing men.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:54 PM
2

Those same people complaining that the father had feelings are probably marching with “End #toxicmasculinity” signs on the weekend.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:43 PM
16

Yeah. She pretended to take a cross-country trip where she totally avoided men... Except for those who built the roads, extracted, refined and transported the gas in her car, built her car, patrolled the highways, raised the food she ate, built the hotels she stayed in. The list is endless. How self-centered can one be?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:03 PM
8

And there are some beautiful paintings by women. About 2% of the market according to some reports. The majority of original artwork that I own was done by a woman. It doesn’t change anything. Men dominate the fine arts because men are more romantic and not sheltered from life. Name one thing Beyoncé has done that can even compare to Mick Jagger crooning, “Wild horses couldn’t drag me away”.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 04:04 PM
2

The Times campaign to “modernise” divorce law is an attack on women’s privilege. FIFY Hell yes, it is!
/r/MensRights23/09/19 01:51 PM
4

Fooking degenerates.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 01:37 PM
14

It’s quite simple. Women are not romantic. Romance is the highest virtue in art, music, literature, poetry, and theatre. Women revel in being the object of romance, but they are incapable of delivering it. The idea of “dying for love” only applies to their children. It takes a man’s heart to bleed in pain the way the fine arts demand. So we get paintings of their vaginas done in period blood and cries of oppression because nobody wants that.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 01:31 PM
16

The shirt should read, “The Past, Present, and Future are Male” for maximum triggering.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:54 PM
17

They do? Women don’t. They “hover”.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 02:12 PM
3

ThEy WaNNa sLeEp wiTh MEEeEe!!!! This, students, is how you diagnose narcissistic personality disorder with delusions of grandeur.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 12:59 PM
3

I’ve seen the way my wife gets manipulated by the kids. You can’t shame me into accepting that!
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:38 AM
4

And we wouldn’t have the plague of social ills associated with fatherless children.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:35 AM
3

Classical liberals, yes. Modern liberalism have fully adopted the oppressed/oppressor narrative, intersectionalism and the supremacy of the state over the individual. Classical liberals are now libertarian.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:03 PM
1

That’s because the root goal of more women in STEM is to flood the market and drive wages down. Companies don’t NEED more programmers to write the next Candy Crush. That’s not a concern in HEED.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:17 AM
16

Progressive liberal men believe “other men” are the oppressors. Until they find out the hard way that, no, it’s been YOU all along.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:02 AM
1

That’s not a wage gap. That’s a competency gap.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:05 PM
3

How insightful. Looking forward to her definition of “sloppy seconds”.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 12:13 AM
105

Teachers are unionized. I challenge anyone to find a union contract that doesn’t specifically prohibit wage differences based on gender. In other words, union jobs, government jobs, minimum wage jobs, all have zero wage gap. The remaining private sector jobs would have to be paying less than 50 cents on the dollar to get the claimed gap.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:58 PM
17

She’s right. I don’t worry that my sons will hurt anyone. They’re not monsters.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:04 AM
5

Were you planning on begging for your rights on your knees from people who consider you an oppressor and the root of everything wrong in the world? There is nothing more anti-masculine than the socialist/Marxist idea that you are incapable of taking care of your own life.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:01 AM
6

Bless you!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:08 AM
13

Do you have a source for the 5/100,000 deaths number. I’m not questioning it - I want to throw it into every conversation I have. But I’d like a source to back me up.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:00 AM
5

This is what privilege looks like.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:20 AM
8

I don’t know that people are opposed as much as we simply don’t believe that progressive policies will ever help working men. The ‘progressive stack’ identifies working men as privileged oppressors. Are we supposed to believe that suddenly you’re concerned for our welfare? Or is this just a ruse to get the last holdouts sucking off the government teat and no longer able to stand on our own two feet?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:34 AM
8

Circumcision is not a Christian thing, it’s an American thing. Circumcision was declared unnecessary for Christians by the Apostle Paul way back at the beginning of Christianity. The book of Galatians in the New Testament condemns it.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:44 AM
1

I don’t think I’ve ever been prouder of my alma mater. Their butthurt is hilarious.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:22 AM
1

If you’re going to espouse the notion of rape culture, you damn well better be able to defend it better than just becoming hysterical and looking to the police for proxy violence.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:09 AM
0

Who fills the prisons? Government. Who declares the “enemy” and steals treasure from the general public and our children to die on foreign shores. Government. We hand sole exclusive rights to use violence to government and then try to shift the blame when they use it against us. Government is the enemy of the people. The less government, the better we all are.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 03:17 PM
13

Stop blaming capitalism for the sins of government. Everything pictured in this meme is the result of authoritarian government, not an economic system. It is entirely possible for capitalism to exist without any of these. What can’t exist is our overreaching, abusive and corrupt political system.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:14 AM
4

There’s a reason why Viagra’s primary market is the US and Israel. Very little need in Europe. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:25 PM
7

The idea behind recording is to save you from ever having to appear before a judge. The recording is for the investigating officers and prosecutors. It’s definitely worth the risk when faced with the alternatives.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:24 AM
4

Testicular cancer awareness month is April. http://www.testicularcancerawarenessmonth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/tca-flyer-1.pdf
/r/MensRights07/05/18 07:26 AM
-9

That’s odd, my boys received the vaccine almost a decade ago from the evil, private US healthcare system that wants everyone to die. Public healthcare is rationed healthcare.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:32 AM
2

The “I’m a GOOD feminist. I want equality for EVERYONE” crowd isn’t a whole lot different from somebody who joins the KKK because the sight of a 20 foot tall burning cross is bloody spectacular. They ignore the history, the message, and the damage and focus on the shiny symbols, never coming to grips with what lies beneath. I don’t feel animosity towards them, but they are unequivocally wrong.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:16 AM
1

Criminalizing boorish behavior only makes more criminals.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:13 PM
1

If you're asking us to leave comments we don't believe in for a grade, sorry, I can't do that. Perhaps a greater sense of integrity is holding back the advancement of men's rights issues, but at the end of the day, I believe integrity matters. In a society ruled by gynocentrism and feminism, it's going to be hard finding an audience that's receptive to being influenced by this message. You're fighting dragons and it's going to be tough. I would suggest giving a shot at some of the male oriented …
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:36 PM
2

Well...the commenter has a point. It's not men who generally set the "beauty standard", it's other women.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:33 PM
1

People are shitting on OP for being a piece of shit. If you're fine with somebody fucking up others people's lives out of vengeance, you should be a big supporter of the current family court system. Men definitely need more reproductive and fatherhood rights, but throwing a temper tantrum and trying to ruin other people's lives isn't effecting change, it's being a butt-hurt special snowflake and a one way ticket to prison. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 01:51 PM
3

That was a top 5 reason why I stepped down after 6 years as a Scoutmaster. Though to be fair, parental apathy was the clear #1 reason.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:48 PM
1

Good. Shut 'em down. It couldn't happen to a more deserving company. Google does more to perpetuate feminist propaganda than NOW.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:31 AM
1

My reaction too.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:24 AM
2

let me guess, you're going to try advocating corporal punishment or something perhaps? Discipline is NOT the same as punishment. Discipline is learned on the sports field. Discipline is doing homework and chores before playing Call of Duty. Discipline is mastery of self and the core of every masculine code throughout history. It's the opposite of the SJW "feelz" culture we live in. And yes, girls need it too, but they're not the ones facing eminent disaster in Western society. I was a Scoutmaste…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:45 PM
7

Hmm...I read it more as feminist-views-of-fatherhood bashing. It seems to be saying our sons need a healthy dose of toxic masculinity. It's interesting that in an article that emphasizes the importance of a strong father figure in boy's lives they don't touch the sacred cow of single mothers and lopsided custody arrangements.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:11 PM
2

Why do people want women to die in combat so badly? Because an entire battalion of dead women will do more to silence the SJW crowd than all the studies about military effectiveness. Callous? Meh. Men are universally viewed as disposable. I think we have enough women that we can "treat them like a man" just like they want.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:05 PM
5

Lol. You must have good karma. I thought it was incredibly suspicious that there was no name, no date, nothing other than a championship race in France. It apparently refers to the 2006 World Championship in Bordeaux, France. The only reported timings I could find are at the link below. The event she won, the Women's Scratch, gives no times and a note that "No records are kept for this event" making it impossible to compare her times with the men's. Pretty convenient. http://www.tissottiming.com…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:00 AM
49

Google image search is amazing. Here is what appears to be the exact same image with an article about the cyclist, Maria Luisa Calle, being hit with a 4-year ban for doping. I guess she's proving women can take performance enhancing drugs as well as men. Good job breaking those barriers, Maria! http://zonacero.com/?q=deportes/maria-luisa-calle-sancionada-con-4-anos-por-dopaje-56060
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:27 AM
26

I took a seasonal job over Christmas that had me working in a back office area typically with one other person. When we ran out of work, I was told to go out on the floor and get the partial batches from the floor. One day, I told a female coworker (also seasonal) to go get the partial batch from the head of HR who was helping out on the floor that day. I had gotten the previous batches and knew who was likely to have the most work. Ten minutes later, the head of HR is flying through the door de…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:30 AM
10

We ban animal sacrifices which are part of many religions including Judaism. We ban the use of controlled substances used by many religions. We ban many punishments for violating religious codes. Putting limits on stone-age practices is just part of living in a more advanced society. This is one more that needs to be ended.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:45 PM
5

I worked in IT for decades. Out of every group/team/department of 10 - 5 women and 5 men - it was almost guaranteed that: The top three producers in the group included one woman and two men. Then next group was the three remaining men. The four remaining women were at the bottom. Why? Low-performing men are eliminated.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:58 PM
3

Our local grocery store had always been pretty good at having plenty of lanes open but the owners are looking to sell so lately they've been cutting back on hours and staffing. The amazing thing is that as they reduce the number of lanes open, the average demographic of the checkers has changed from 40-60 year old women to 18-25 year old men. And those guys are FAST.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:40 PM
3

Thanks for putting this together.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:13 PM
7

Any roadmap for getting it changed in my state?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:21 PM
2

Y'all must have some funky smelling girls at that school if they're needing a collection for soap, deodorant and wipes.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:18 PM
4

That's part. It also has to do with differences is how men and women evaluate non-tangible benefits such as flex-time, on-site child care, benefit packages, etc. Men typically go for hard cash while women take a more "wholistic" approach. Men also statistically commute further which shows they are more willing to sacrifice personal time for the bucks. Men work more hours and take less sick and vacation time. And, at the risk of being politically incorrect by resorting to biology, testosterone gi…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:40 AM
2

I'd say that as a former STEM professional who participated in many hiring decisions, I have NEVER seen a salary offer made off a resume alone without an in-person interview. The "study" is not indicative of real world situations. It is a contrived study with a preconceived result and, as others have pointed out, the position was not a STEM position, it was an academia position. Skidmore College is a social justice institution, not a research university. They're very open about having an agenda.…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:01 AM
2

Egocentric fallacy + ethnocentric fallacy = your whole argument. Sorry, but I'm going to go with with the Kinsey Institute and Case Western on this one.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:51 AM
2

Says the guy who tries to prove his point by citing Burning Man. Even the Kinsey Institute agrees - men have a higher sex drive than women. THERE IS NOT A SINGLE STUDY THAT SHOWS OTHERWISE. https://kinseyconfidential.org/men-sex-women/
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:39 AM
4

Men stay in crappy, abusive marriages out of a feeling of obligation. Take that way, and those numbers would snap around the other way overnight. Women leave because of oppression. Men stay despite oppression. Who wins?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:01 AM
2

I don't have to think. Established facts make thinking irrelevant. You're simply buying into the exact point I made. Just because some feminists theorized that social pressures (the PATRIARCHY!) make women suppress their innate wild sexual desire, the rigorous research paints quite a different picture. In fact, they couldn't find a single study that showed men's sex drive was not higher. Women are people. Men are people. But women are not men. They are different. Embrace it. The sex drive refers…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:38 AM
18

Society isn't trying to downplay the differences in libido - they are trying demonize all normal male sexual behavior. a) First, establish the proposition that sexual behaviors are the same in men and women. b) Then, take the female behavior as the standard. Any greater interest in sex can now be classified as deviant behavior. The Harvard Men's Soccer fiasco is a perfect example of this. Men have been rating and evaluating potential partners since before they were standing upright. Women have b…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:26 PM
4

Yeah, duh. Respect should be the default and for the overwhelming majority of people, it is. But let's be honest, Jess. It's not respect you want, it's unconditional acceptance and deferral to whatever nut-job idea just popped into your hollow skull. Respect is supposed to be a two-way street - mutual respect - but when one side is constantly making up imaginary faults of the other (manspreading, mansplaining, oppressive "Men Working" & crosswalk signs, etc.) the respect equation breaks down and…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:49 PM
1

It's not about establishing victimhood. March for the issues - educational access, family court reform, workplace safety, unemployment, mental health and suicide, justice reform, genital integrity, paternity rights, and the right to have our voices heard. Getting into a pissing match over who adds more value or is more marginalized will accomplish nothing.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:46 PM
3

At least they are using the phrase "...women earn..." rather than "...women are paid...". Now they just need to work as hard to earn as much. All the law enforcement agencies around here are unionized. I worked as a corrections officer for a while. Unionized. No union - and especially a public service union - is going to allow a gender disparity in compensation. Your rate is set by contract and there's not much flexibility except for working overtime. I'm not intimately familiar with private sec…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:04 PM
8

I know. Right? Those boys in South Africa don't need Internet access and training because they've got all them swell diamond mine jobs. It's about the intentional cultivation of a labor class (men) and an intellectual ruling elite (women). Not a single one of the first-world problems covered in the article needed to be gendered. None of the solutions need to be gendered either.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:15 PM
1

A strike is only useful if you have enough support to make a noticeable impact. Otherwise, it's just a joke (see #ADayWithoutWomen)
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:52 AM
8

I was out a few times today. Nothing. The world went on without them.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:34 AM
9

'#NotAllBuzzfeedWriters?
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:25 PM
8

You ROCK! I only made it as far as "...the importance of respecting women." Sorry, but respect doesn't come automatically with a vagina. You want respect? Be respectable.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:20 AM
5

The US Department of Labor's report, "An Analysis of Reasons For the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women" - aka the CONSAD Report gives the following summary: Extant economic research has identified numerous factors that contribute to the gender wage gap. Many of the factors relate to differences in the choices and behavior of women and men in balancing their work, personal, and family lives. These factors include, most notably, the occupations and industries in which they work, and their h…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:29 AM
9

Lolz. Found one! http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:06 AM
2

Then women do not have a right to become a mother. A man should have the right of refusal for her to use his genetic material and should be empowered to force an abortion if he chooses. As it stands, he doesn't even have the right to be informed. But you're absolutely right on learning to choose better partners. There are programs for women - where are the ones for men?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:05 AM
1

I didn't get that sense from OP at all. SHE prefers to dare traditionally masculine men but I don't get any sense of disdain towards those who don't meet her dating criteria. I would guess most men here would not be interested in dating her obese feminist friend either. That's not a sweeping condemnation - it's simply what one finds attractive in a potential partner. It's a more "feminist" position to insist that you can't have personal preferences because they're unfair. We all have plenty of p…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:33 AM
10

My high school son turns 17 in two weeks. I just had to have a conversation with him to let him know that the law may SAY you're not an adult until 18, but if you run afoul of the law, they will push to charge you as an adult now. So yes, in the eyes of the legal system and society in general, high school male=man; high school female=girl.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:42 AM
3

A Facebook friend shared a post today from NPR full of carefully picked statistics trying to discredit Donald Trump's recent statement that he'd inherited "a mess". They chose to compare data points on the day Obama took office with the day Trump took office. Of course, since we were in the middle of an economic collapse when Obama took office, most of those points showed improvement - with a few slightly lower to try to maintain the illusion of impartiality. But buried in the middle of all that…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:08 AM
1

try being Queer and Crippled and walked out on! You win the Oppression Olympics! But since you were walked out on and not murdered, your very existence supports my argument.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:08 AM
1

As the husband (caretaker) of a wife with MS, I'm personally familiar with the toll disabilities can take. I don't dispute your assertion that female abuse is less noticed. I also don't dispute the fact that they "all too often" don't just leave - even one abuse case is too much. What I dispute is the assumption, based only on gender, that this was a case of abuse, resentment or any other nefarious motive. But the fact remains that the marriage rate is significantly lower and the divorce rate si…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:06 PM
5

Amen. Unless you're dealing with the long-term care of a disabled loved one, you have NO CLUE what the caretakers go through with almost no support. Resentful partners leave. Murder-suicide is more often a tragic attempt to maintain some dignity and togetherness.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:09 PM
10

Nobody is body shaming you for being circumcised. We are values shaming you for supporting it.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:29 PM
3

offer to surgically remove both the entire epididymis and the entire vas deferens Now you're talking about going from a 20 minute no-scalpel procedure to an invasive procedure with major incisions and tissue removal. The complication rate alone is enough to get this rejected by any medical ethics board. Up to 10% of vasectomies are eventually reversed. That's over 50 times higher than the failure rate. Your plan would eliminate that option. The medical community does not OWE you consequence-free…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:37 PM
16

Women enlist others (family, boyfriends, the State, etc.) to commit their crimes. They also employ less direct methods like poisoning which may not be as readily detectable. But given the huge disparities in homicide rates between various communities, any generalization to "men" is entirely baseless.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:48 PM
3

Full, physical castration would increase the effectiveness of a vasectomy to 100%. Should the doctor offer that? If you don't want a vasectomy, don't get one. Nobody ever promised you foolproof birth control. I've found doctors to be very up-front about the failure rate. If you go ahead with it, you assume the risks. Nobody is forcing you to choose a vasectomy. You are responsible for your own decisions and actions.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:31 PM
6

The failure rate for vasectomy is approximately 0.15% and most of those failures were within the first three months. When I had mine, I was: a) Fully informed of the failure rate b) Told to continue birth control for 3 months Trying to find someone else to hold accountable for every unexpected turn in life is not healthy.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:18 PM
4

And yet, a woman who kidnaps, sexually abuses and tortures a man for over two weeks including crushing his testicles with a pair of pliers and shoving a 3-foot metal rod up his rectum before finally murdering him is a featured speaker at the Women's March. Got it.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:23 AM
1

If you "had yours done", congratulations. You were given a choice that many of us were not and would choose differently. But I suspect you didn't "have yours done" at all. I suspect, like the overwhelming majority of men, it was done to you without consent.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:13 AM
3

You don't need earlobes and it's not invasive to cut them off. And boys are TERRIBLE about washing behind their ears! Removing healthy tissue without consent or medical reason is indefensible. There are no conditions of the newborn penis for which circumcision is indicated.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:05 AM
2

Even my mother-in-law is starting to come around. There's still hope!
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:59 AM
8

Cut dad here with two intact sons (19 & 17). You're absolutely right. I've asked my boys about teasing in the locker room. It never happens. The fear of being caught "looking" is much stronger. It's funny what people think goes on in a locker room. It's really pretty mundane.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:55 AM
27

It only took Carly Fiorina a couple of years to tank Hewlett-Packard and Compaq with it. GE must be trying to beat that. The market doesn't care about your social engineering.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:17 AM
2

There is zero REAL scientific evidence that circumcision DOESN'T decrease sensitivity. Take all the studies showing no effect and throw out those authored by Brian Morris. There's nothing left. The entire "body of knowledge" can be traced back to one man who's "research" references his own work more than any other experts. Brian Morris is a molecular biologist by trade specializing in hypertension. His advocacy for circumcision is not in line with his credentials which has led many to speculate …
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:35 AM
1

How is dipping the wick in the toilet water healthy? But to your point, I won't feel emasculated as I stand three feet back and take my best aim at the bowl! I'll feel challenged!!!
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:31 PM
5

Yes. That's true. But ongoing research is being suppressed. Is transgenderism caused by the over abundance of chemicals that mimic hormones that we are all exposed to? It's a theory...but you can't research it. It would be denounced as not accepting transgenderism as the perfect expression of an individual. It's fine to say, "Born this way", but nobody is allowed to ask "why?" The future best option may be something else, but we may never know. The current recommended treatment is not spectacula…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:45 PM
3

Screw the consent laws. Record EVERYTHING. If you get nothing from it, quietly destroy the tapes. If you get something important, take it to your LAWYER (not police!) and let them figure out how to get around the consent law. In most (if not all) states, violating the consent law is a misdemeanor. Many have "intent" clauses and if you're still married, you may be legally empowered to consent on behalf of your spouse. Don't throw away your best, and maybe only defense on the grounds that you migh…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:51 PM
13

I used to call myself a liberal. I've hosted a struggling minority family in my home and was one of the loudest voices in my local council supporting letting gay kids stay in the Boy Scouts. Then I was angrily informed that I cannot say I'm an LGBT ally. Only THEY can make that determination and because I disagreed on some minor point, I was out. I was told I was a transphobe because I said I wouldn't date (have sex with) a transgender person. I was told I was racist because I pointed out that p…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:30 PM
8

Where I live, parents who HAVE gone to the school board have been mocked and ridiculed in the local press. One incident even went national. It's a liberal enclave in a red state. Going against the grain is simply asking to be labeled with whatever "_phobe" name allows them to dismiss your concerns. The Progressive Stack rules all decisions. It is simply not allowable to suggest that a straight, white male student might face any difficulties. Like almost all US school districts, ours is ruled by …
/r/MensRights09/02/17 01:19 AM
11

Because gender theory, in PRACTICE, has been used unabashedly to demonize men. Having a son in public education, I can tell you that this is an actual issue that affects men. Adolescence is hard enough without school sponsored social pressure to choose an alternative gender in order to conform to the nonconformity. Teacher: What gender are you, Timmy? Timmy: I'm a boy. Teacher: You're not trying hard enough. Yes. Shit like that ACTUALLY happens and that's nothing compared to the pressures other …
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:35 PM
1

LMAO. These all look like psycho-triggers. You should ask at least half of them before EVER getting involved with a woman. If she freaks out, dump her and find a mentally stable woman. You don't need that kind of drama.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:14 PM
41

Of COURSE the wage gap is real. Feminists said so! So if companies AREN'T exclusively hiring women, doesn't that mean they can't do the job even 79% as well as a man? That would be the break-even point. <I better put the 'sarcasm' tag on now before people lose their minds>
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:20 AM
8

Why do hypersensitive people always feel the need to go nuclear? He said WORDS to her. You don't need to ruin his life. We have a bit of local fallout from the Women's March. They marched passed a fraternity where some young men made some off-color remarks. Now there is a push to close the fraternity and expel the students over WORDS. People need to get a sense of proportion back.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:29 PM
9

Other way around. I believe it was SHE who shat in HIS sink.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:54 PM
4

Individual liberty is the cornerstone of liberalism. But today's political left rejects even the notion of individualism and only recognizes group identity. This is why a woman who kidnapped and tortured a man for 14 days, crushed his testicles with a pair of pliers, shoved a three-foot metal rod up his anus and then killed him can be invited to speak about how oppressed she is at the Women's March. To the political left, SHE does not exist as an individual with rights and responsibilities. Only…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:49 PM
24

I worked a production-line job where everybody took breaks at the same time. There'd be 20 guys waiting for the two urinals in the bathroom every break. One day, there was a really butch woman cleaning the men's room when break time hit. After the third round of guys stepped up to the urinals she exclaimed, "Can't you see there's a woman in here?!?" I, and the couple of guys I laughed about it with later never even noticed. Sorry, honey, I get 15 minutes to piss, smoke and grab a drink. Your gen…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 02:11 PM
5

"They're just bigots. And bigots always need a target." - Shaun King Looks like you've found your target. Why are these people so oblivious to the fact that they continually do the exact same thing they complain about in others?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:48 AM
2

How to navigate the hypergamy? I feel a book coming on. 1. Remember that the voice is your head is the most important The messages we tell ourselves define our reality. Make sure that voice is supporting and reassuring. You can't expect someone else to support you if you don't support yourself. The latest feminist craze is to blame non-compliant women with "internalized misogyny". Don't do the same thing. Men are not evil. Women are not evil. Individuals of either gender may be evil, but but pai…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:49 PM
2

Screw that. Get an old-fashioned tape recorder, slap it down in the middle of the table and tell them you will be recording every interaction with them. Let them stare at a running recorder as they think about what they're going to say next.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:39 AM
1

(A continuation and expansion of this ^ thought; not a rebuttal) People make unconscious decisions to mold the reality they want. Many (not all) women still want a strong provider in a mate. If that means they have to hold themselves back so their partner maintains the lead, they will do it and blame it on outside factors. The other factor is testosterone which gives drive, determination and focus - aspects likely to be rewarded in a business environment. I've been a team lead on mixed-gender pr…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:12 PM
1

Marriedredpill has some excellent material, but 99% of the guys there wield it like a baseball bat to beat their spouse into submission. The Red Pill policy to implement here is not agree and amplify - that's just an excuse to be an asshole. The correct Red Pill policy is to recognize that you're engaging in Defend, Explain, Excuse, Rationalize (DEER) behavior and stop it.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 12:20 AM
18

I've been married 20 years. It took the first 18 to figure it out, but the last two have been fantastic. When your wife is talking to you about women being afraid of men, she's not talking to prove a point - she's talking to validate her feelings. You can validate the feeling without validating the "fact" underneath. Tell her it's awful that so many people walk around afraid of their neighbors these days. People - not women. Neighbors- not men. Men and women talk for different reasons. She may S…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:35 PM
9

This ^ is the most important point here. Your brother is probably already being physically abused - if not, it's coming soon. A woman who feels comfortable hitting her boyfriend's family isn't going to hesitate hitting her boyfriend. The fact that he allows it to continue indicates he's already fearful of her. Emotional abuse almost always precedes physical abuse. She knows how to play the game. Continuing with this monster is a sure trip to prison.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:15 PM
2

It's funny how just yesterday there was a story about how women are stifled in business due to a lack of constructive feedback and mentoring by men and now we have a story about how they need to be separated and isolated. Go ahead, if you take yourself out of the loop, the rest of the company will move on without you.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:59 PM
1

But by definition, a woman ALWAYS knows more than a man. So "mansplaining" can be reduced to "any time a man is talking". /s
/r/MensRights23/12/16 06:24 PM
15

No, he meant blank slate. The theory that there are no innate, biological differences between genders and all observable differences are due to social pressures being imprinted on the "blank slate" of the child's brain. Mansplaining for the win!!!
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:56 AM
4

My cat hasn't cured me yet. He's a bad-ass alpha cat. Both dogs fear him.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 03:35 AM
4

It's the natural progression of identity politics. Once group B starts demanding equal footing, group A decides it's time to go it alone. It's not a coincidence that this is proposed by a middle-aged white feminist.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:24 PM
2

When women are in charge, you get a $600 EpiPen. Evolutionary psychology posits that women's vaunted nurturing behavior is very tight-knit and clannish. This is born out by the OKCupid data which shows men are twice as likely to date outside their own race as women. Nice try. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:09 PM
2

I'm still waiting for the push to get more women into "dirty jobs". Every time I need my septic system pumped, it's been a man.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:54 PM
8

If they'd quit calling everyone who didn't swallow the intersectional feminist line a deplorable, racist, sexist, ___phobe, bigot then maybe people wouldn't be moving to the political right. I was a self-identified liberal for years. I'm not welcome any more because I believe that men have rights too.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:58 AM
1

I dislike the intersection of Red Pill philosophy (which has some excellent points) and MGTOW. If a man wants to live without female companionship, I'm totally fine with that. But when you selectively take manipulative behaviors from the Red Pill side and mix it with a disdain for women, it just becomes another superiority movement. There's a lot of good, helpful stuff from both sides, but it's extremely easy to combine the two in a toxic manner. Just like feminism, the practice is often a far d…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:44 AM
19

Damn homophobes. They should be shut down like a small bakery.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:54 PM
437

English already has a gender neutral pronoun..."it".
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:44 PM
11

I was going to suggest a monthly "Fishing Day" for men, but "Fapping Day" works too.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 10:07 PM
1

Chores?
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:50 AM
2

Yup. I was going to write the same response. I got cold-cocked by a stranger while walking a female co-worker to her car after close. It seems the guy was pissed at the world and I was handy. Men are twice as likely to be the victim of a violent crime but that, apparently, is not a concern.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:24 AM
1

No. I accept the two boys I raised as my own regardless of whether they share any chromosomes or not. I wouldn't want to know. Who would it help?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:44 AM
6

Now we can only tell our daughters to be strong, independent, competitive and tough. Telling our sons the same thing will only lead to mental health issues. /s Sorry, but the whole thing reminds me of the pharmaceutical ads all over my Dr's office. They're not there to help you, they're there to increase sales. They don't want the tough cases, they want patients who come in complaining that they feel "too much like a man" and need help fixing that.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 12:52 PM
7

Actually, circumcision was used as a less-likely-to-result-in-death alternative to the common practice of castration for slaves in the ancient world. The theory is that Jews, who have a long history of being enslaved adopted the procedure as a way to "own it". In ancient Egypt captured warriors were often mutilated before being condemned to the slavery. Amputation of digits and castration was common, but the morbidity was high and their resultant value as slaves was reduced. However, circumcisio…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:16 PM
35

It's an earnings gap - not a pay gap. Men & women are paid essentially the same but men work more hours and are more willing to sacrifice commute time and job flexibility for higher salaries. Many physically challenging jobs (lineman, etc.) have extensive outreach programs for women but they get very few applicants. It seems women don't want to get a 2:00 AM call that a major storm hit three counties away and they need you on the truck in 30 minutes. The Department of Labor's CONSAD Report concl…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:55 PM
3

You must not have attended a Democratic Party caucus. Radical feminists were everywhere and they were not shy about it. You can also find them in high concentrations at any educational venue and many churches (I can personally vouch for Unitarians). They are also well represented in non-profit organizations. Just because you don't run into them in your circles doesn't mean they don't exist. They exist and are in positions of power to influence policy makers for their own ends.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 02:20 AM
8

My preschoolers used to tell me they were puppies.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:10 PM
7

If she's now an ex, breath a sigh of relief and learn some lessons from the experience. If your opinion doesn't matter on discrimination, then her opinion doesn't matter on lots of things - including relationships that you're no longer in.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:04 PM
3

That seems too harsh, no? Not in the least. Castration removes the sex drive. That's why we do it to animals and why it was historically done to slaves. So you live life as a eunuch or commit to a life-long regime of hormone replacement therapy. I agree it's easy for people to talk big when it's not their own money on the line. Did the OP expect the rest of us to subsidize this through our insurance premiums or Medicaid? At any rate, it's not a call for change to the system, it's a histrionic re…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:45 PM
6

Don't publicize it. It's not a rational voice for men's rights - it's a catastrophic overreaction and attention grabbing move and speaks more about men's mental health problems than about childcare and custody issues. The public reaction will be mockery, derision and ridicule.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 02:28 AM
1

You obviously haven't looked at the 2018 races yet. Only 8 Republican Senates seats up and most of them are in deep red states. Democrats will have to defend 25 seats including 10 from states Trump won. Unless Trump is literally caught in bed with Putin, the Democrats will most likely lose more ground in 2018.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:59 AM
1

I agree totally with your analysis of 2016, but the moves the DNC is making now (Sanders & Warren heading Senate, Ellison @ DNC, etc) are only doubling down on the identity politics. If they continue to ignore the working class and demonize whites, heterosexuals and men, they won't get any further in 2020. Democrats have a lot of soul searching to do and if the announcement put out by my state's party today is any indication, they're not willing to do it.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:50 AM
18

Simple. Don't talk to women.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:34 PM
7

Two years of national service can have a lot of benefits for young men AND women. It doesn't have to be military.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:38 AM
6

There's no win here - only dodging a bullet. Homelessness, suicide, paternity rights, circumcision, unequal education, criminal justice reform and family courts didn't, and won't, change one bit. The struggle continues.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:01 PM
1

I don't like racing so just end it already.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 03:37 PM
39

If you scroll to the comments, the first one is about some other author withdrawing consent to have her material linked in the article. And they belittle her and refuse with absolutely NO sense of irony.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:50 PM
3

How dare they make the gendered assumption that tutus are feminine! Men with "healthy masculinity" can wear tutus! I've seen it on campus!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:32 AM
6

Get used to it. In the corporate world, it's an annual event. I watched their sales pitch video. It looks like they're tracking scores on a pre-test and a post-test. I'd love to tell you to score lower on the post-test, but it's not worth risking any fallout.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:28 AM
8

Hillary lost because she enthused the opposition more than the base. Period.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:36 PM
3

When equal access and equal treatment are denied, it becomes an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:19 AM
3

You left out educational equality.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 01:27 AM
3

I'm not sure which "created male" needs deconstructing. It sounds like you're buying into the feminist BS of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:47 PM
4

The "Dancing Boys" of Afghanistan are nothing more than child sex slaves. And the US government supported it on US military bases under Secretary of State Clinton's watch. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/world/asia/us-soldiers-told-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys.html
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:17 PM
1

It's unlikely that someone would end up in a sub such as /r/MensRights without first being badly hurt in a relationship or relationships with women. Uh. No. I wound up here because I have two sons - one who has finished one year of university work (on break this semester) and another who is a high school Junior. I'm very concerned about the treatment they will receive in an environment that prejudges them to be the enemy.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 01:30 AM
2

She also engaged in a defense that centered around painting the victim as a sexually aggressive woman with an attraction to older men and petitioned the court to order a psychological evaluation of the victim. Every accused deserve a competent defense, but these tactics go beyond that standard and are clearly "victim blaming". It's impossible to suggest that a woman may have made a bad choice in any other case without being accused of victim blaming, but Clinton gets a huge pass from her support…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:17 PM
3

What if he wants to use the N word? Where do we draw the line? We draw the line at the courthouse. It's not illegal to use the N word - only socially unacceptable. The law Petersen is fighting against makes "wrong" speech a criminal act. That's where we draw the line.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:57 PM
1

Much of their statistics will be pulled from the CONSAD report. Rebut this with the report's own conclusion. As a result, it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women. In addition, at a practical level, the complex combination o…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:14 PM
1

Fifteen years of carefree sex and counting make that 30 minutes and a weekend of being pampered well worth it.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:30 AM
1

So much body shame there.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:22 AM
13

In order to understand many of the "toxic" groups you point out, one has to realize that cultural Marxism is the basis under which almost all of them operate. Under cultural Marxism, maintaining the identity as an oppressed group is the highest priority. Without that status, their entire reason for existence becomes questionable. Therefore, any point which questions their victim status is, in fact, a direct threat to the existence of the group and is met with hostility.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:12 AM
4

Still waiting on the first female to come out and pump my septic system.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:57 AM
5

But it's cleaner and healthier and it looks better and their religion and it should be the parents choice! /s
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:20 PM
3

Our local community/volunteer bike "kitchen" where you could get free maintenance and buy donated equipment for pennies used to have a similar anyone-not-male night. The last time I went to donate my kids outgrown bikes, I noticed the whole thing had been scrapped. Apparently there wasn't enough interest.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:28 AM
8

I'm not sure. Just today, I replied to a Facebook post from a former co-worker who had posted a toxic screed about how all women are sexually victimized and there are no "good men" who will come to their rescue. I responded with local hometown examples of good men doing good things (crews going to FL for hurricane cleanup, etc) and challenged the self-reporting of sexual assault being significantly higher than confirmed incidents. I saw a flurry of response notices on my phone, but by the time I…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 09:06 PM
1

Yeah, I saw the troll warnings. But I agree with the user who said there's no shame in an honest answer. My wife of almost 20 years now was actually a Women's Studies minor at a major university when we met. She was always puzzled by the older, married women in class who weren't buying the whole gender war narrative. It only took about two years to deprogram her. But what attracted me in the first place was her hot-burning passion. And she was attracted by my calm confidence. The first time we m…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:47 AM
1

The patriarchy isn't the meat swinging between our legs, it's the seats of power and control that lord over us regardless of what's between the legs. And who's the first to go running to those seats of power at the first hint of difficulty? Feminists. Always looking for someone strong to take care of them. SMH
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:33 AM
2

Welcome to the mainstream, guys!
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:27 AM
1

You came in with the preconceived notion that your inability to identify female lineages reveals a deep misogyny in Buddhism instead of considering the cultural, social and individual needs of real people practicing Buddhism in the real world. It's the same flawed argument that supports the pay gap myth. When everything is considered, there is nothing left over to be applied to "discrimination". The "enlightenment" you feel is an enlightenment of ego.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:26 PM
8

I saw a post a few days ago bemoaning the status of male friendships. It was little more than a sad attempt to set women up as the standard by which to judge men. Being not-women, men were, of course, found lacking. When I spend time with friends, my wife wants to know how their kids are liking school. I don't know. Are they going anywhere on vacation? I don't know. Have they seen so-and-so lately? I don't know. Thankfully, these things never come up. But we did talk about way to control flies f…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:02 PM
12

My wife gets mad at me when I choose to sleep on the couch.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:32 PM
2

The point it DID make was that once again, cherry picked examples are uses and manipulated to further the narrative. Secretaries were not the original programmers, they were keypunch operators. Nobody magically went from filing and answering phones to coding.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:00 PM
5

Except...that's a caricature in the public mind and doesn't reflect the vast majority of men. In 52 years, I've met a lot of men. Maybe 3 of them acted like that and they faced a lot of social pressure to change their behavior from other men. If that's what you see in the men around you, you're in the wrong crowd.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:03 PM
3

If you're old enough to remember President Jimmy Carter's brother Billy - that's how I view the MGTOW folks. You do your best to keep them out of the public eye, but in the end, they're family even if they are embarrassing most of the time. But they are fundamentally NOT like feminists. Feminism is a branch of cultural Marxism that divides the world into oppressors and the oppressed AND seeks to overthrow the oppressors so that ... the oppressed ... become ... oppressors themselves? (I don't thi…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:56 AM
1

While I might agree with your reasoning, there is absolutely no reason to believe a word out of Hillary's mouth. Before the ink was dry on the "most progressive Democratic Party platform ever" containing sections promising to safeguard the environment and respect Native American's rights, lands and heritage, she stood silent as attack dogs were unleashed on those trying to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline from threatening Native lands. As Secretary of State, she oversaw relations with local inhab…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:59 AM
1

The DNC's opinion of Hispanics isn't much better if you recall the hacked emails. They're both turds floating around the bowl trying to see which one floats. I don't see either one as any better or worse for men's rights. The struggle continues regardless of the outcome in November.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:46 AM
6

Meh. It's better. But when the commonly held theory is that women are subjugated under the sexist boots of men, it still leaves open the interpretation that there is something more nefarious than the simple consequences of women's choices.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:40 AM
4

I agree 100%. Unfortunately, the current political hysteria completely shuts down any investigation into environmental factors with screams of transphobia!
/r/MensRights25/09/16 05:27 PM
1

But that's not the question here. That's a question for a different situation. Here, the guy gives no indication that he's going to leave. We get stories about custodial ex's who are living with a new guy for 10+ years and holding off getting married until child support runs out. They're cunts. This guy's trying to pull the same shit. He's looking for a meal ticket. I've got zero sympathy. If you want to play house, you take care of those under your roof. It's called being a responsible adult.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 11:29 PM
5

We need to recognize that feminism has totally sold out to the cultural Marxist theory (aka SJW) of oppressors and oppressed. Some may be willing to accept male individuals in their ranks, but they can never accept that the oppressors have any legitimacy or their theory falls apart. Any begrudging admittance that men may be disadvantaged in some area is immediately summed up in the "it's men's (the oppressors) fault." Without any critical thought, they can solve all the world's problems by blami…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:42 PM
1

I think your elevator skipped a floor. A vasectomy isn't going to raise or lower your odds there. But to put your mind at ease, I am very afraid of the rapist label.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:31 AM
1

Of course they will. That's what they do. Nobody gets raked over the coals like a woman who won't play along. Women are viscous to each other to a degree that men really can't understand.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:26 AM
1

Take it up a level of abstraction. I tend to use lib-splaining or SJW-splaining. I consider myself a classic liberal who has zero tolerance for the cultural Marxism of today's so-called liberals. I know lib-splaining because I've been guilty myself. Third-wave feminism is fully covered under the umbrella of cultural Marxism/SJW but using these terms takes the focus off the gender roles and saves me from having to deal with the responses of, "You fucking cis-het male! I'm Lemon-Meringue-Pie-Gende…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:23 AM
2

You can't overstate the "great sex without fear" aspect. Best decision I ever made!
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:03 AM
3

Going hand in hand with the risk factor is the simple fact that MANY woman simply don't want to move up the ladder. My wife works in a female-dominated STEM department for a major company. When her manager (female) retired, the two most senior employees (female) were offered the position. They both turned it down. My wife is now Manager of Research and Analytics. After almost 10 years, they've started making overtures for a more senior position. My wife shot that down. She doesn't want to go any…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:50 AM
10

Yup. The real male privilege is that nobody cares to hear us whine.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:06 PM
-1

He had plenty of choices. He kept playing Russian Roulette with his wife's eggs and finally lost. Now he's whining about it as the bullet travels down the barrel. Too many people want consequence free sex. That's juvenile. If you let your wife have sex with other men, you already waived your right to be butthurt when she turns up pregnant. If they guy decides to stay with her, he absolutely has a moral and legal obligation to raise that child.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:59 AM
-1

So stone the woman and child to death and pat yourself on the back because "ain't nobody gonna control me!" Of course men aren't the only ones responsible for respecting the family, but the failure of others to do the right thing doesn't relieve this man from his responsibility. He thought he was going to be cool and enlightened and have an open marriage. This is the shit that happens. People want all the fun, but never want to pay the price. It's the exact same argument feminists make and claim…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:42 AM
0

Very much men's responsibility. You can't argue for men's rights in family matters and then throw the "family" under the bus. The child comes with the wife. Abort it, divorce her, or support it. This whole "It takes a village" nonsense is what feeds the notion of disposable men. If you don't want to be disposable, don't pretend like it's OK to dispose of children born in your household.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 05:23 AM
9

That's the best that could happen. Don't even wait for them to make the decision, tell them you are uncomfortable with the current TA and request to be assigned to another section.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:01 AM
5

Nice. Circumcision is now child molesting too.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:06 PM
3

Oh FFS! They didn't discover some new female empowerment technique, they did what every junior staffer does to get around the senior staff. In my last professional job, an hour before big meetings, I'd be stopping into various offices and saying, "You know, Ted's gonna oppose this so I really need you to back me up. And bring those Q4 sales reports in case we need them." The headline should be, "Female Obama Staff Finally Realizes Staff Meetings Aren't Slumber Parties"
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:20 AM
1

I always love the anti-patriarchy whines because they never state the alternative they are seeking. It's just the same old patriarchal system with THEM in charge.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 05:42 AM
8

That would be a welcome relief over today's message of, "women are free to enjoy sex as much, as often, with as many partners and as kinky as they like, but men need to have a notarized statement of consent with two witnesses, have at least one impartial witness throughout the act, videotapes to be turned in to authorities within 24 hours and maybe, just MAYBE, she won't cry "rape".
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:42 AM
8

A woman can become CEO of a giant pharmaceutical company and raise the price of their leading product 400% so she can line her pockets. Congratulations. You made it. You're equally as despicable as any man. Women are only 12% of Governors. Big deal. So far, I've seen exactly zero women come out to pump my septic system. Men account for 93% of workplace fatalities. Bring that number closer to parity and we can mansplain why extra paid leave for you is special treatment, not equality.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:17 AM
5

Why not? The only outcome you should care about is "your kid/not your kid". Unless the other potential fathers were your dad and two of your brothers, the test should work.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:15 PM
1

It municipalities would just enforce drinking age laws, college "sexual assaults" would plummet. The vast majority involve alcohol and underage girls.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:18 AM
2

The problem with OP's framing of the question goes all the way back to the word "friendly". "Friendly" implies that there is an obligation to recognize, and view positively everyone's race. Frankly, it doesn't make one bit of difference 99% of the time. Suicide rates are high across the board for all types of men. Sure, certain subgroups are higher or lower than the average, but if we can't move the baseline, there's really not much hope for any subgroup. The same for justice system interactions…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 03:11 AM
9

The dominant force in academia in the US is the American Association of University Women. They are an extremely radical group and are behind much of the anti-male feminist narrative. Their early work with girls in public education was artfully torn apart by Christina Hoff Sommers in her book, "The War Against Boys." I don't need you to tell me the glories of academic gender studies - my wife was a gender studies major at a Big 10 university when we met. Now, she can't believe that the harmful an…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:00 AM
-2

Lol, it's good advice for any relationship - boss, friends, parents, cops, or wife. Get over your self-important need to be right all the time and things go a lot smoother.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:43 PM
3

Only the most accurate tests will show a positive only one week after conception. A girl who can't pay her phone bill is getting her tests from Dollar General. She was already pregnant and singled you out as a patsy. Get a paternity test and tell her to pay half.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:53 AM
2

I never thought about the benefits of hooking up with a guy quite like that. You actually make some good selling points.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:52 AM
-6

Well...if you're happy living in your parent's basement and hoping for a minimum wage increase...marriage probably isn't for you.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:46 AM
–

Nice try. I haven't read ALL of the comments here, but I haven't seen ANYTHING that would even remotely suggest that anyone is proposing "casting out" anybody for their stance on BLM. There is a huge difference between saying "this isn't the place for debating that topic", and saying "you're not welcome here". You wouldn't discuss motorcycles in /r/cooking or composting in /r/legos. It is only unchecked privilege that believes they have an inalienable right to hijack topics.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 06:03 AM
–

It looks like your wish for this NOT to turn into a race issue was short lived. There are a lot of comments about "intersectionality". I have yet to see any positive outcomes from further subdividing a group. Eventually, it always comes down to, "You can't POSSIBLY understand what it means to be an W, X, Y, Z!" This is typically followed by further splintering (see BLM stopping Pride parade in Toronto). Boundaries are necessary in any community. If a person wishes to support BLM or oppose BLM, t…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:46 PM
14

Many third-wave feminists believe that ALL sex between a man and a woman is rape because...patriarchy!!!
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:05 PM
262

Lol, I had to unfriend my sister on FB when the story came out about a university requiring all males to take a "consent" class. When I asked if all blacks should take a "how to not rob a liquor store" class, all hell broke loose.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:32 PM
1

My comment wasn't denying any privilege - it was pointing out that the angst over "privilege" is a fundamental shift in thinking that, instead of raising up people on the bottom like the CRA attempted, is now focused on tearing down the top. It is the influence of Cultural Marxism on liberal thought which says the dominant race/culture/gender is always wrong and must be overthrown by force, if necessary. Modern liberalism (or neoliberalism, if you like) has morphed into a destructive ideology wh…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 03:01 PM
10

There's the problem in a nutshell - the attitude that that says "...more privileged than we should be." This implies that one group needs to be drug down to the level of everyone else instead of lifting everyone else to that level. Liberals used to say "A rising tide lifts all ships." Now, they just want to tear everything down. I quit identifying as a liberal when I finally realized liberals are all about destroying everything with no workable replacement. No different than Republicans and the …
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:03 AM
4

It's the beginning of the end for women's sports.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:46 PM
2

My wife was a Women's Studies minor when we first started dating. I could usually tell when she was trying out some new "insight" she learned in class on me. One day, she asked if I minded her having a subscription to Ms. magazine. I told her, "No, but what are you getting from it?" I opened a handy issue (she had them everywhere!) and flipped to the first article. "You're a victim" was the message. Next article, the same. "You're a victim", "you're a victim", "welcome our newest contributor", "…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter