TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jubbergun Archive

View 4 posts and 898 comments by jubbergun on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

This isn't about sexist regulations? Dear Lord, the whole point of "disparate impact" is to impose "equity" outcomes which preference women over men. It's about nothing but sexism! Even your example makes that obvious. They lower the standards for women so they can "fairly" compete with the men, making it easier for women, who then displace men who can actually met the real standard.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:01 AM
2

If "equal outcomes" aren't achieved through a system that is fair to all involved and treats everyone the same, then it's not equality. If that sounds "stupid" to you, it's because you're stewed in the deplorable collectivist garbage that proliferates on this wretched website or you lack the intelligence and imagination to comprehend the moral and ethical implications of "equal outcomes." In either case, I keep "bringing up equity," because that's what you're describing when you say "equal outco…
/r/MensRights11/06/26 02:43 AM
5

"Equity" isn't equality, in theory or practice, no matter how much you might wish to insist that it is. Just because the two words sound the same and seems similar doesn't mean they are the same in any way.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:53 AM
6

Equal outcomes is certainly a form of equality. No, it's not, especially when you have to treat one person/group more harshly or in ways that aren't fair or just in order to achieve those "equal outcomes." Giving $100 dollars to someone for doing $100 worth of work while at the same time giving $100 to a different person for doing nothing isn't at all "equal" for the person doing the work.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:11 PM
17

"Looking at outcomes" isn't equality. It's "equity," which isn't at all the same thing. Conflating the two is one of the reasons things are as they are.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:20 AM
13

Yes, this is not being done to exclude men. It's being done to preserve the "chastity and dignity" of women. They're segregating the women to their own space.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:23 AM
10

You would think with all the cognitive dissonance they would have realized somewhere that those two things are mutually exclusive. The cognitive dissonance and groupthink indoctrination are the very reason they can't see it.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 09:44 PM
1

The unions he created have now abandoned him due to anonymous unsourced accusations of unspecified crimes. What I read today wasn't "anonymous" or "unsourced." Women who were young girls at the time went on the record about what they (allegedly) experienced. One of the cofounders of UFW, Dolores Huerta, went on the record and said Chavez forced her into sex and manipulated her. She even claims he knocked her up and she kept it secret. There were at least two other named accusers, Ana Murguia, wh…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:50 AM
21

The reason they can only "look rich" instead of "be rich" is because they'd squander $5k on something silly like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/26 12:53 AM
8

I don't like making light of people's deaths, either, but the AWFL/AWFUL abbreviation was a thing months ago. It didn't come about because of Renee Good, and isn't solely meant to mock her. You can do a search on Google for how long it's been a thing. I know a friend sent me something about it before Christmas.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 06:08 AM
15

He's also one of those people who can see the problem, but can't allow himself to see the actual root causes, and ends up with "solutions" that will likely make things worse than better. On a different thread about this guy and his book I said that calling these problems a "masculinity crisis" was just a fart-sniffing way of saying "men aren't doing what we want them to do." Society (purposely) destroyed all the incentives men had to do things the people like Galloway want or expect them to do a…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:16 AM
4

Jobs going over seas was not a dem thing on their own. Gee, that's a much different take than "that’s 100% the GOP’s doing." It's almost like it wasn't "100% the GOP’s doing," especially when you look at democrat policies over the last 40 years, isn't it?
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:03 PM
22

based on that one thing, you vote red? Income inequality is a much bigger issue and that’s 100% the GOP’s doing. It's not just that one thing, and what really blew up our economy and sent far too many jobs overseas and exacerbated wealth disparity was the NAFTA crap that a democrat president signed in the 1990s.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 09:36 PM
4

Thank you for saying it. This isn't hoisting someone by their own petard or watching them suffer the consequences of their actions. This is assault of the worst kind. The Nair is seriously caustic. It could have gotten in her eyes and blinded her, for fucks sake. What the fuck is wrong people?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/25 02:28 AM
1

The "out of their gourd" shooter for the Minnesota congressmen was himself a registered Republican, Trump voter, and wasn't "out of his gourd" until the actual shootings by any MAGA metric his politics were perfectly sensible. The guy was appointed to some government board by Walz, had a "No Kings" sticker on his truck, and claimed that Walz had told him to kill a bunch of people. "Registered republican" or not, that's a lot of points in the "not right-wing" category...which goes back to the mai…
/r/MensRights09/10/25 03:45 PM
2

Democrat congressmen being shot in a sequence By people who didn't think they were left enough, or people who, based on their 'manifesto' or other writings, were so apeshit crazy you couldn't even tell what their politics were. Gabby Giffords, and Mark and Melissa Hortman, were shot by people who were, by any reasonable metric, out of their fucking gourd. They weren't "right-wing shooters." You can't say that about the guy that shot up a congressional baseball practice and nearly killed Steve Sc…
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:58 AM
5

Call it a vigil or memorial instead of a grave and it's still not much of a distinction.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/25 09:28 PM
13

I dread the answer, but I have to ask: In what way was that comment ironic?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/25 09:26 PM
5

FAT LOGS OF TROOF!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/25 09:23 PM
4

This website is overflowing with them.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 01:47 AM
8

let's assume everything she mentions is true (which of course, i didn't fact check it but it all seems plausible), and is following through on that I'd be willing to make that charitable assumption if not for the last umpteen years of "men bad" nonsense from the lady's party. They've lost men and now they're pandering in a feeble attempt to win them back. Let's keep in mind that pandering includes setting up a study/workshop to "understand men" that makes it sound like we're a fucking alien spec…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:32 AM
30

This was a controversial opinion even back when my ex was doing her masters in public health, but our own NIH has recognized the phenomenon of "reciprocal violence" that Girkin is referencing. It's only controversial because it states the obvious: men and women with poor conflict resolution skills are equally likely to start a physical altercation in the course of their relationship, but men usually appear to be the offending party because they're far more likely to cause harm to their female pa…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:18 PM
2

The rectal version might work better.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 01:46 AM
13

He wasn't hiding. Dude was out in plain view for last 20 years. Everyone knew how he behaved, including the people accusing him now, for that entire time. He was given a pass even by his alleged victims, who are only coming forward now decades after the fact, because he was famous. He's still famous, or at least infamous, but now he has the "wrong" opinions, so he has to be taken down a peg. So everyone who previously embraced or at least enabled his behavior now want him punished. These charges…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:09 AM
1

I haven't judged the show. I haven't said anything about its quality at all. All I did was point out that everything about its alleged popularity appears contrived. If I weren't thinking independently I wouldn't have come to that conclusion. I find it a wee bit odd that anyone who, like you, didn't just swallow the marketing crap for the show and these absurd policy prescriptions, but now speaks to those who haven't with derision as if they're the suckers, would have the unbridled temerity to ac…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 08:39 PM
1

"Major release of media coverage" where entertainment is concerned is almost always the result of some sort of coordinated campaign. That's why studios have marketing departments. Those studios usually deluge the media with their marketing before the movie/show launches, not after the fact, as is the case with this show. That's why I find it suspect. I don't think the showrunners are part of some conspiracy, but I do think certain political interests have taken advantage of the show to try to ju…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:04 PM
2

OK, good for him. Not sure how that's any sort of rebuttal of anything I said. I didn't know this show existed a few days ago. I'm apparently not alone in that, even in this thread. It's extremely weird, to the point of making it suspicious, that there's a media campaign like this for this show that apparently already comes with political implications. In the last couple of days the television sub has been deluged with similar sounding if not identical tongue baths about this show from multiple …
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:28 AM
15

It's like nobody watched it and only read headlines. I don't know a single person who has seen this show, so that makes sense. What doesn't make sense is how everyone is going on about a show I only heard about 3 days ago and how some people are suggesting or actually making policy based on a work of fiction. It's almost like some powerful, influential group cough WEF cough wanted to implement some moronic policies based on immutable characteristics and this show was produced and promoted to ena…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:32 AM
2

I didn't imply anything. I clearly stated that none of "these people" were worthy of deportation. Weird, because you were just arguing you weren't implying exactly that. Some of these people are worthy of deportation, but even they need at least a cursory hearing before being shoved on a plane out of the country. Your "here's a small list of people who shouldn't have been" doesn't magically make the list of the greater majority that should have been objectionable.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:08 PM
2

Well, that kinda makes sense, too, since the administration is saying deportation is a civil matter, and are only citing the criminal activity as a justification for their decision(s) to deport. I still think it requires a hearing of some sort. Like I said, "that's the whole point of due process, to figure out who is in the country illegally and what, if any, crimes they've committed or criminal ties they have." I only object to the way OP is characterizing the deportees.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:05 PM
2

If you're going to cry about "reading comprehension" you might want to reread my last sentence where it should be made obvious I agree that due process needs to be followed. You might also want to avoid mischaracterizing an idiom like "pure as the wind-driven snow" to mean "white" if you're actually serious about getting the point of what others have written. If you want to try to deny that you very clearly chose to imply none of these people were worthy of deportation, that's on you, but don't …
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:42 PM
4

The commenter implied this is a partisan issue promulgated by progressives. Yes, and Gee-Dubs was and still is in the "democrat-lite" wing of the GOP, as evidenced by the anti-Trump hysteria from his pals that had to flee the sinking ship of The Weekly Standard to take refuge aboard The Bulwark and his crony Cheney actually straight up campaigning for Kamala. He's one of the corporatist hacks that didn't want to do anything serious about illegal immigration because the US Chamber of Commerce and…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:31 AM
8

True, but it's hard to take anyone who says something like "innocent Venezuelan male immigrants who have no criminal history or gang ties" seriously, as if every person loaded on one of those planes was pure as the wind-driven snow. Of course, that's the whole point of due process, to figure out who is in the country illegally and what, if any, crimes they've committed or criminal ties they have.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:22 AM
19

Or it’s time for the Man Vote to invade the Democratic Party. I generally don't go where I know I'm not welcome. I'm "toxic" and expected to know my place, which is sitting in the back of the bus and silently going along with what I'm told to do. No, thanks for asking, but I have no interest in affiliating myself with people who hate my face.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 03:00 AM
159

How do we know it wasn't self-defense? Unless he was nibbling on her ankles like the Black Knight in The Holy Grail, I'm going to go out on a limb and say the fact that he's fully fucking paralyzed would be what people in law enforcement refer to as "a clue."
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:03 AM
3

Put in context, I doubt it. Even now most people would say "19 and 15 are an acceptable age difference." This is exactly the sort of thing that Romeo and Juliet laws are written to deal with and I think you guys are being more than a little melodramatic over a picture that is 40 fucking years old. Does OP work for the rag that printed this goofy fucking story?
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:20 PM
2

How dare people notice something and remark upon it? /s
/r/MensRights05/12/24 01:57 AM
5

Poor kid probably grew up without their dad and that's one of the reasons they're like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/24 08:23 PM
2

Um, it's a kilt, and I'm tired of your attitude about my fashion sense. 😛😛😛🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights20/11/24 10:34 PM
9

We prefer the term "hirsute."
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:59 PM
2

Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil’s former chief of staff, Chad Condit, Of course he's a Chad, LOL.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 09:12 PM
3

I hoped bombarding him with this kind of content would eventually normalize my world for him. You don't have to "normalize" something unless it's abnormal.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:50 PM
2

I hate how she gets a pass from everything just because trump is worse. Is he, though? Look at it this way: Despite being the people who keep telling us "democracy is in danger," the DNC has done every thing it can do avoid any actual democracy in its presidential election process since 2016 when the party did all it could to thwart Senator Sanders getting the nomination. No one was really allowed to challenge President Biden during this primary. Florida canceled its primary so it could just han…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 02:58 PM
3

I went to culinary school, so... Most of the women I've dated couldn't make macaroni and cheese and thought I was some kind of space wizard because I could boil water. I don't think this is a gender issue, but the idea that men don't cook when the vast majority of professional chefs are dudes seems silly.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:21 PM
1

None of those things were "free" since they were part of the compensation package, unless you want to say the money I was paid was "free," too. I was trading my time, effort, and engaging in varying degrees of personal risk for all of that compensation. There was nothing "free" about any of it. Worse, I didn't do 20 years, so I have nothing in the way of "retirement" compensation to show for it. So yeah, a room I had to share with one or more swinging dicks, the opportunity to go to the corpsman…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:01 PM
4

I was in the Navy for 8 years. I made E-5 in two-and-a-half years. I didn't make as much money in the military as I made waiting tables and bartending until I had been in over five years. It gets better over time, but when you're first starting out the compensation is abysmal.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:00 AM
9

But think about it for a minute..you’re being housed, you’re being fed, you don’t have to pay for basic necessities. You could have said the same thing about slavery. It's not much of an argument in favor of it.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:58 AM
-1

I always laugh at the "qualified to be president" bit. A person only needs to do three things in this country to qualify to be president: * Be a natural born citizen * Be at least 35 years of age * Win the presidential election Trump has done all three of these things at least once. That he held the office shows that he's qualified. You can reasonably argue that he sucked at it, but you can't say he's not qualified.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:12 AM
12

In all fairness all rich and powerful people donate huge amounts of money to both sides. To which republicans did Weinstein donate?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:35 AM
-5

he had an ugly looking dick Has anyone ever seen an attractive dong?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:34 AM
10

Sorry, these people are such caricatures that it's difficult to tell one from the other. It's like trying to tell discern the difference between Superman and the various rip-off characters he's inspired. theyrethesamepicture.gif in human form, if you will.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 10:27 PM
2

Like any complex societal problem it's something only a fool would try to attribute to a single cause. I wouldn't outright dismiss the idea that there is some kind of "women owe me" entitlement involved with some of these guys, but I sincerely doubt that is the root cause. It looks like most of these guys are impoverished and suffering from mental illness. NYC, where this seems to be most prevalent, has stopped holding criminals accountable for their actions, which emboldens this sort of behavio…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:17 PM
22

Isn't she the one who wrote "I hate cat-calling" then followed it up a few years later with "I miss being cat-called?"
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:04 PM
2

Pffttt...we all know what it takes to be a man.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:21 AM
29

Which now? Is it a violent group or not? Make up your mind. I'm not sure how anyone is surprised by this, because this rhetorical tactic is applied ad nauseum in modern society. That's why you hear dumb shit like "internalized misogyny/racism" to describe women/minorities who aren't 100% on board with whatever is being pushed. It's why you hear people being accused of being "<bad thing>-adjacent" when people like the ADL or other left-leaning groups can't find a useful avenue of personal attack.…
/r/MensRights31/03/24 12:01 AM
9

I don't know why you couldn't just link the Dad's video without this other guy's stupid, long-winded commentary. Fucking videos like this drive me nuts. He doesn't add anything of value to the situation. He's just dick-riding on a more popular video hoping for attention.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:01 AM
13

My father was wholly absent. Which is explains quite a bit, and is likely the way their mother wanted it.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 07:22 AM
2

Fucking hell, dude, this is the fourth or fifth time you've posted this. Once was enough, twice was a nice reminder, the third time was a bit much, and now you're being annoying.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:23 AM
2

Well, not only that, but "they say" isn't evidence of anything. It's just a claim, and likely a baseless one.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 03:30 PM
14

when someone is nice to you, they are actually being nice to you rather than trying to get in your pants Speak for yourself. My pants are very comfortable and I'd assume any reasonable person would want to wear them.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:07 PM
11

Men claiming to support feminism should be treated with suspension. This is the best typo I've seen in a week. It's like you're saying we should hang them all, LOL.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 06:35 PM
7

The "white girls and dogs" thing was a running gag on /r/Drama back when it was a thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/23 04:41 AM
5

The article makes it sound like all the book does is point out the obvious, but sometimes it's difficult to put what is obvious into words and communicate what is obvious to those who refuse to see it in an effective manner. It sounds like the author is targeting the book at the people who most need to have the obvious revealed to them. I no longer do a great deal of reading, but I might pick up a copy out of curiosity.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:02 PM
2

The author is wrong on the "men bad" part, but they're right about almost everything else. I don't think we have separate facilities for men and women because "men are dangerous." We have them because of social norms and basic modesty. Not a lot of people want to be naked in front of strangers, and want even less to be naked in front of strangers of the opposite sex. The idea that you can just proclaim you're 'x,' even though it's patently obvious that you're not, and must be treated as such is …
/r/MensRights02/11/23 02:25 PM
5

Yeah, this wasn't the usual case of some poor schmuck getting railroaded. It's pretty hard to argue Cuomo hadn't acted inappropriately. If anything, this article shows that it doesn't matter what you've done so long as you're a part of whichever party is in power. Democrats in NY weren't going to prosecute one of their own.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 04:59 AM
5

Bizarre that you assume that there is a left/right political element to the metoo accusations It's not the least bit bizarre to assume that considering how the 'me too' cheerleaders reacted to Joe Biden being accused of sexual impropriety. Plenty of left-leaning people have been caught up in the 'me too' dragnet, but the only person I can think of who wasn't dragged through the streets and tossed in a hole after an accusation was the democrat presidential candidate. Politics definitely have some…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:48 AM
3

I have no idea what the accusations even ARE It's The Trial by Kafka brought to life.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:42 AM
6

Where do the betas keep getting this lock and key metaphor? Women aren’t locks. Your dick isn’t a key. Somebody here obviously didn't see Ghostbusters.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/23 03:07 AM
4

The only things democrats have done on healthcare have made it objectively worse (my father still rages on about the PPACA), the VA is hot trash regardless of who is in office, and I don't want people in prison voting. People who have done their time should have their rights restored, but people who have seriously fucked up so badly they have to be in prison shouldn't get a vote. The only time democrats care about infrastructure is when they use the spending as a sop for their union support. Bot…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:02 PM
11

"The other side of the aisle" doesn't not benefit all of us, and it's silly to suggest it does. I don't know how any reasonable person can try to pretend they only "put men down every now and then," as if it's not overwhelmingly the left that engages in absolutely malicious man-hating. Dems aren't going 3 steps forward and one step back, they're fucking moonwalking, and you're here playing the role of doormat. It was republicans that ended lifetime alimony in Florida. What have the democrats don…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:19 AM
6

note how they (not so subtly) equate MRAs with 'far-right'? Anything they don't like gets labeled as "far right." It's just a tactic to delegitimize whatever their target is. It became impossible to ignore once they started accusing lefties who didn't follow the script of "becoming right-wing" or using "right-wing adjacent talking points."
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:56 AM
7

I think she did not point out the elephants in the room. That's because none of the people involved will allow themselves to see a) what the actual problems are and b) how those problems might be solved because a) they're only paying lip-service the problem because it needs to be addressed and don't really care because it doesn't actually affect them and b) even if they did care they won't allow themselves to see what should be obvious because of their own socio-political baises. "The problem wi…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:06 AM
3

I think it's slightly more inspirational to build a submarine that doesn't kill the people inside of it, but I'm a bit of a contrarian.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 02:19 PM
6

This reminds me of a recent AITA thread where some woman was complaining that her husband, who works 60+ hours a week compared to her 40, was "disrupting their nanny's schedule with the kids" when he tried to spend time with them. The post should have been called First World Problems: Women Hardest Hit.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:30 PM
1

Then they end up turning themselves in as they get red pilled and become completely based. -- Some Violent Extremist, Probably
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:50 AM
19

This isn't just about men's rights. It's about human rights. The judge is making a ruling based on laws that should be considered nullified by the 13th Amendment.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:06 PM
8

I actually think there's some logic behind what Leo is doing. So do I... Reporter: A lot of your romances have been with very young women. Why is that? Leo: I don't date women my own age. Reporter: Why is that? Leo: Because I don't have to.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:25 AM
2

Its a DV shelter is for helping female victims of violence
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:15 AM
2

Because the T-people brigade thinks they can gin up some hate for Rowling in a whole new space. Rowling isn't doing this to spite men. It's part of her pushback to the shitstorm she got from Blue Check weirdos because she said "I don't want people with dongs in places women should feel secure."
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:59 AM
145

It's been hard for Rainbow Brite since she lost her career in the 80s and developed that meth addiction.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/22 03:46 PM
1

Being kicked from a University isn't a criminal punishment. They're imposing a penalty upon someone for the alleged perpetration of a forbidden act. Private colleges can do what they want and reap the lawsuit whirlwind, but state-run institutions should be held to a higher standard.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:31 PM
27

there’s no discussion of class/socio-economics in our intersectional model That's on purpose. The intersectional model is designed by middle-to-upper class academics to benefit middle-to-upper class academics. It ignores socio-economic status as a point of privilege because the people who benefit from it are generally socio-economically privileged. The whole point is to give them victim points for demographics that they can trade for increased clout and job security.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:17 PM
0

How did Elon "buck the system"? The current trend among the elite is that free speech is dangerous, that certain people shouldn't be allowed in public forums, and that certain information should be hidden from the plebes. Musk took a very vocal stand against that and said he wanted to buy Twitter to stymy that sort of behavior. That made him an enemy of entrenched interests. Enemies of entrenched interests get smear campaigns and abuse of government power aimed at them.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:57 PM
5

Regardless of whether Musk got a heads up about this particular situation or not the standard means of dealing with prominent people who buck the system is to run some kind of smear campaign against them. The minute the dude started talking about echo chambers and how free speech is in trouble anyone with two brain cells to rub together should have been able to figure out what was going to happen.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:07 PM
47

First, Elon didn't "predict" it. He really didn't need to predict it. I've been waiting for something like this ever since the Twitter nonsense began.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:10 PM
1

Word
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:51 AM
1

Word
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:29 AM
-1

Chonky is just a synonym for thicc. This girl is big but I don't see cottage cheese thighs or fat rolls. To each his own, but I'd let her buy me dinner.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:21 AM
6

I wouldn't kick her out of bed, either. I don't have the necessary leg strength.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:15 AM
1

Gonna have to disagree with you. As a great prophet once said, "I like big butts and I cannot lie." She's not Tess Holliday fat. She's just chonky.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:12 AM
7

I prefer Vienna Sausages.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 07:25 PM
53

That would be a violation of the Geneva Conventions.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 01:24 AM
131

Sadly Proudly walks to the couch
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 12:42 AM
0

No one really thinks it's a personal issue. Some people are spinning it that way because they think if they can say it's just moral prudes policing a person's private behavior that they can avoid any discussion of the hypocrisy involved, which is the thing about which everyone is actually upset.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 08:14 PM
1

she's scheduled to be executed August 27th 2021. Man, that's shocking.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/21 04:37 AM
2

I'm advocating for a) not being filthy pirate hooker on the internet and b) being smart enough to avoid dating someone who is a filthy pirate hooker on the internet. Doing things that tell people "a look at my vagina is worth about tree-fiddy" is a great way of communicating that your only true value as a person is as a hole for a cock and even that little bit of value isn't worth much because you're willing to trade it for dollar store prices. Worse yet, dollar store prices are about the best y…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 11:47 PM
7

Again, you can do cognitive cartwheels until the cows come home, but no matter how you spin it you can't make a ho into a housewife. You're probably right that you can't debase yourself, but only because you sound like you never had any dignity to lose.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 11:26 PM
21

Pimp's don't love these hos.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 10:43 PM
9

Yes, it does, and trying to play cognitive Cirque du Soleil to say that dating someone with so little self-esteem that they're willing to sell their dignity online for $6.99 a pop is a good choice not only doesn't change that, it makes you sound like some sort of simp who is so hard up for affection that you're willing to debase yourself for it. In which case you're probably right. The woman debasing herself for cash is probably a perfect match for the man debasing himself for a chance to fornic…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 10:42 PM
38

Yes, because he wouldn't let them.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 10:19 PM
24

If you weight the value of "actually getting laid" against the value of "not getting tangled up with an online prostitute" his math logic remains valid.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 10:17 PM
64

Good thing, because only an idiot or a pimp commits to a ho, and in the case of the pimp it's more that the ho commits to the pimp.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 10:15 PM
2

A true thespian could always act like a blonde who can't act.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/21 07:01 AM
1

I can't help you with your stupidity, friend. Not surprising when you can't even help yourself with your own.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/21 04:51 AM
1

Oh, well, if Mitch McConnell said it -- after voting not to convict, no less -- then it must be true!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 11:18 PM
1

Literally they acquitted Trump Of course they did, because he didn't do what he was accused of doing, and thus far no one has been able to point me to anything he said in context that could be taken to be an invitation or instruction to start a riot. no senators have been charged for supporting the rioters Again, probably because none of them supported the rioters. You're conflating people objecting to the election legally to people who started a riot because they objected to the riot. It's cute…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/21 07:34 PM
0

Fails to live up to it in the eyes of a biassedl observer, yes. I believe I just said that. Congratulations, you're fluent in your mother tongue, it's a pity you'll never use it to utter anything intelligent. The remain camp didn't do anything to sway the vote in your eyes, naa? As I said before, you've allowed your bias to stop your brain from working. Well, I'm an American, and the only bias I have here is in favor of the results the democratic process and the truth. The truth is that the demo…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 01:15 AM
1

The guy stated confidently that more people support Brexit than oppose it Which is objectively true if you believe the results of the Brexit vote, since the majority of voters were in favor of "Leave." Polls after the fact are just indulging an addiction to C O P E.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 12:21 AM
0

Going by that logic, your opinion is meaningless because it's arbitrarily being branded as unfair and biassed. Well, my comment is biased, whether it's fair or not. I'm not claiming to be an impartial observer. The BBC, however, does make that claim, and routinely fails to live up it. It's amazing the nonsense people will make up to avoid democratic decisions. Funny, that's what I just said about all the people butthurt that "Leave" won doing things like manufacturing polls so they can claim the…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 12:18 AM
2

Don't pretend the BBC is a fair and objective observer. The organization was clearly pro-EU membership. The country voted on whether or not to leave the EU. "Leave" won the vote. No one disputes the results of that election. "More people want to stay" after the fact is just refusing to accept reality. The BBC can do whatever sort of misleading polling it wants. Manipulated polls won't change the reality of what happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 08:43 PM
-1

They're both, just like the idiots at the Capitol in January were both Trump supporters and crazy people. The difference is that I don't see prominent Republicans saying January 6 was a "mostly peaceful protest" or "riots are the voice of the unheard."
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 08:34 PM
20

The person who wrote this foolishness has obviously never realized that romantic relationships are transactional. The "emotional labor" feminists whine about was part of the currency of the transaction. Traditionally, both parties agreed their sexual and emotional efforts would be exclusive to the other party, men provided resources and affection, and in exchange women provided support and affection. men feel they are “constantly posturing and self-monitoring, not only to achieve desired heteros…
/r/MensRights23/12/20 10:13 PM
2

Democrats?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 07:26 PM
4

He was actually the son of God and God himself as part of the Holy Trinity. How? I dunno. I don't think the Bible itself gets too deep into it. I'm sure there's an amateur theologian here who can bullshit their way through it, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 04:53 AM
1

You mean she didn't get a "fact check?"
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:07 PM
3

They believe in hardcore gender/biological essentialism. Their worldview and philosophy is filled with countless paradoxes and tend to conflict with one another. I would think the world of paradoxes would belong to the people who have adopted this new notion that gender and sex are somehow divergent when the two terms have been interchangeable for the majority of human history. As an example, those who argue that gender and biological sex are separate concepts yet insist that biological females …
/r/MensRights18/05/20 07:04 AM
3

I wouldn't call feminism a cult, but there are some similarities. Look at how feminists recruit. They have inserted themselves into shelters for abused women in order to recruit desperate, vulnerable people who need help and support. They run gender identity courses on college campuses to groom inexperienced people looking for a place to fit in. In either case they tell their targets that if anyone questions the things they've been taught they need to cut those people out of their lives (you can…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:36 AM
31

Imagine thinking any of those men have reproduced.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 06:08 PM
16

She asked for a roast, OP, not a cremation.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/20 06:21 AM
3

At this point there isn't much of a difference. Science has become highly politicized. Most of the people I see being accused if being "deniers" agree that climate is changing, but they disagree about mankind's contribution to that change or with the suggested "solutions" to the problem. Most of the solutions amount to little more than dumping money into NGOs and other international organizations where it gets squandered by bureaucrats, or sending that money to third world dictators as a pay-off…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:53 PM
10

Your preamble about bots reads less like a concerned warning and more like an admission of guilt. I don't particularly care if anyone wants to accuse me of being "fragile" for pointing out that the only reason for trotting out ugly adolescent Eurotrash as a spokesperson is so that you can accuse dissenters of "being fragile" or "mocking a little girl." Insults from people engaged in or enabling that sort of callow emotional manipulation have no sting. It's like being accused of hating women by a…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:43 PM
32

The whole point of Greta is that if you disagree with her or offer any critique of what she says you can be accused of bullying a little girl. It's the sort of thing only a group of cowards who know they can't prevail in a fair debate would do. That's galling enough, but when you consider the overlap between this group and the sort of people who had no problem trying to "cancel" the kid(s) from Covington High School after they were framed with out of context video involving a Native American act…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:34 PM
3

Man, their knuckles must be sore after that.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/19 11:49 AM
8

In the past, psychiatrists referred to being transgender as a delusion. Imagine that. Someone had the audacity to label a belief that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted to be reality as a "delusion." Where did that person go? They should be put in charge, not chastised for getting something right.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:55 AM
3

I took to mean she was so insufferable than no one could tolerate her long enough to establish a relationship.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:52 AM
20

Stevie Wonder may be blind but he's not deaf.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 01:39 AM
4

Yeah, really, how the fuck does that NOT count?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 10:09 PM
11

So we take the staffers word for it? Funny how fast #believeallwomen goes out the window when your supporting your political party, isn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:05 PM
2

Don't shit (or fuck) where you eat.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:03 PM
0

Reverse cowgirl?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:01 PM
-1

As a wise child once queried: Por que no los dos?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:00 PM
4

Great, now I gotta dig out my Zeppelin records. You fucker.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:00 PM
6

Next on ppd: Ilhan Omar uses campaign funds to have an affair with her campaign advisor brother.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:59 PM
1

That's an ad, and that's great ad placement. Whoever is doing marketing for the campaign has their shit together.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:59 PM
1

i'm just saying this is some Ross shit They were on a break. Fuck Rachel. She was just mad because she thought Ross wouldn't be able to get any action and he schooled her.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:56 PM
2

That just means she won't get clingy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:54 PM
2

I don't know how anyone could ever downvote this. It's almost obligatory that someone do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:53 PM
1

it’s one Dem who fucked up. Well, to be fair, neither democrats nor republicans tend to fuck up as a group. Usually when there's a scandal it's just one of them doing something stupid all by themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:51 PM
4

Yeah, the picture has been blurred. What a rip off. :D
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:49 PM
7

Because decent people don't want anything to do with the media anal exam and dirty shenanigans of their opponents AND colleagues.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:49 PM
4

Yeah, I'm old enough to remember when Al Franken was funny. It was the best five minutes of his career. (ba-dum-tiss)
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:46 PM
5

This is one of those (somewhat rare) occasions where Twitter has a valid reason to do what they're doing...that doesn't mean the valid reason is their actual motivation. They have a pretty extensive history of political bias at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:44 PM
12

A) Pussypass B) It's good to be a democrat. If this were Sara Palin or Ann Coulter you wouldn't have to look very far to find the pics because Twitter and the media wouldn't put any effort into hiding it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:42 PM
18

That is probably bound to happen when you dump your husband and third wheel for a new bang-buddy. Jealous husband/third-wheel gets pissed and sells you out and you end up with your naked ass on the internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:40 PM
5

Sometimes you have put in some effort, man. Life isn't always 4k video and high resolution pictures. Some of us grew up on scrambled Showtime transmissions and pilfered porno mags. You have no idea what the time before was like!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:39 PM
3

Honestly I’m trying to help people stuck in this place I used to be. Oh, God help us, it's a "male feminist." Someone get this schmuck out of here before he rapes someone, LOL. Remember, kids, not all rapists are male feminists, but all male feminists are rapists!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 07:34 PM
3

It is a bit perplexing, but at the same time, I feel the same sort of satisfaction that I would feel over a PPD. Like a sense that something off-kilter has been put right and good has triumphed over stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 07:01 AM
5

You work with Wil Wheaton?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/19 11:02 AM
5

If you want to talk about the methodologies and statistics, /r/science is all about that. Horseshit. /r/science is the Reddit equivalent of FB's I Fucking Love Science idiocy. It's a bunch of people pretending to be smart who are, at best, average believing they're smart because they think the way they were told. If you took the average /r/science user and asked them to describe the scientific method or why replication and being able to falsify results are important you'll get a lot of blank sta…
/r/MensRights28/09/19 09:56 AM
9

If anything, my experience indicates that it's women who can't form friendships. I lived with the guys I went to college with for almost 12 years before we all started going our separate ways. We still live in the same area and hang out regularly. My ex had exactly one friend, and they didn't spend much time together. One of my college buddies just got married. His wife is the same way. I don't know many women who have a large group of friends. I know a lot of guys that are nearly inseparable. T…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:49 AM
0

If your point is that no one should request supporting information because they're talking to disingenuous individuals, I'd suggest that asking them to actually make or prove their point is probably one of the best ways to highlight how they're engaging in a dishonest fashion. While you're not likely to convince that sort of person that they're wrong, questioning them demonstrates the frailty/error of their assertions for those who are receptive to differing opinions.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 11:54 AM
0

Yes, of course.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 08:45 AM
1

This sort of juvenile thinking is a big part of what is wrong with Reddit. If you're going to say something hyperbolic, controversial, or just plain obnoxious, you don't get to be indignant that anyone would ask you to explain yourself.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 08:34 AM
13

Ideology is exactly the problem, but the problem isn't whether or it's the "right ideology" or if I agree with the ideology. The problem is that ideology has never had anything to do with what the ACLU did in the past. They defended everyone regardless of the ideologies involved, because if the rights of the most despised among us were safe and protected, so too were everyone else's. One of the most basic tenets of civil liberties is the right of free expression. That's what the ACLU used to rep…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:33 AM
17

Corrupt as in "having gone from defending the right to speech even when it was unpopular and difficult to seeing free speech as something that should be exclusive to certain groups of people."
/r/MensRights05/09/19 03:27 AM
60

The ACLU, which famously defended the right of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie, IL, in the 1970s, explicitly endorsed the view that free speech can harm “marginalized” group and because of that the organization no longer has an absolutist stance on free speech (i.e. they think some people should be silent and won't lift a finger to help those people).
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:41 AM
2

Ah, now that is more in line with my expectations. I didn't read the article, it was pay-walled for me for some reason.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:07 PM
12

How did that sneak by the editors at WaPo? They're going to get their Right Side of History™ cards revoked.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 05:49 AM
8

I quit using P&G after the "boys will be boys" ad, and the only things I really miss are Dawn and the Crest Complete cinnamon toothpaste. My dishes still get clean with the other stuff, though, and I can forego the glorious rush of cinnamon and settle for mediocre mint if it means sticking it to anyone who thought that ad was a good idea.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:52 AM
-9

Difference is that this guy is actually doing some good for the world while she's on the sidelines putting people down. I wouldn't bet on that. Anyone who has even a hint of an idea about how Wikipedia actually operates knows it's a biased clusterfuck. I'm sure if you go looking into what Wikipedia says on the topic of things like "men's rights" you're going to be in for a shocker. The worst part is, you can't even get the articles corrected because some people sit on top of these articles and e…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 03:31 PM
1

My dandruff is actually pretty severe, and the zinc-based shampoos like Head & Shoulders don't do jack shit for me. I have to run a cycle of a shampoo with salicylic acid acid as the active ingredient one day and a shampoo with coal tar as the active ingredient the next day. I usually use a moisturizing shampoo on the third day because the dandruff shampoos dry my hair out, even though I condition after using them. For that reason, I'm not familiar with the "average" dandruff shampoos available.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:07 AM
1

If not, you could order it online.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:56 AM
1

There's always Selsen Blue, Neutrogena, and Nizoral.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:02 AM
3

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:15 AM
1

I'll have to look for Cascade next time I need dish soap. Good call.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:52 PM
1

Yeah, I even had to give up my favorite toothpaste. Crest makes the only good cinnamon flavored toothpaste.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:23 PM
2

That wasn't hard. The Walmart knock-off version is actually better than the brand name.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:22 PM
2

Downy makes dish detergent?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:20 PM
66

I suspect that P&G will sell the Gillette brand shortly. Too little, too late. I cut out all P&G products after that ad. I'm still having issues finding decent replacements for Febreze and Dawn. If there's a little "P&G" on the package anywhere it doesn't go into my cart.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:46 AM
1

The only reason Al Franken was thrown under the bus was because the junior senator from New York wanted to run for president and knew she couldn't beat him in the primary. Not that she'll ever be the candidate. Republicans would have a field day with her record.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:45 AM
1

I thought he got jail time... ...oh, he did, but it was one-day sentence, WTF. Looks like he's going to be living in poverty for the rest of his life, and he'll never work as an attorney again. At least there's that.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/19 02:36 AM
5

...just like she was!
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/19 12:28 AM
2

That prosecutor got wrecked for his shenanigans if I remember correctly.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/19 12:26 AM
-3

Who else would work for what we pay public servant if not the slow-witted and incompetent?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/19 12:25 AM
9

Latvia, is that you?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/19 12:23 AM
1

The teacher will probably be suspended or fired...they shouldn't have assumed the student's gender. /s
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:15 AM
12

extreme right wing racists who just happen to be men because the extreme right is one big sausage party that can't attract women Marie LePen?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:45 AM
4

I don't think she needs 30 years of hard labor, but they need to impose some sort of deterrent penalty, otherwise you'll have people willing to take the slap on the wrist to interfere with the rights of others to speak on campus.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 08:13 AM
30

Yeah, I laughed when she said "This restricts women's rights" after she violated this guy's right to freely assemble and speak and his right to property. She doesn't care about rights, or if she does she only cares when it's her rights. Nice to see there were some consequences here.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 08:11 AM
1

/r/readanotherbook
/r/MensRights24/04/19 05:44 AM
3

My only question after watching this is "why are you doing a series on masculinity and none of the contributors are men?" Maybe it's a way of insulating this from criticism, but it seems pretty fair so far.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:58 AM
0

Plot Twist: this guy is Jaden Smith.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 06:47 AM
3

"Dog Whistle" is a cop out term for people who don't understand how metaphors work (if you can hear the whistle you're the dog) and want to accuse people of using veiled/coded language without putting in the effort of explaining how their language is actually offensive. I have no interest in adopting and using the term, especially in this case. "Toxic masculinity" isn't in any way veiled or coded. It's an obvious, up-front, in your face slander of men and/or male behavior. We should be shutting …
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:48 PM
2

Aside from getting hit on by James Woods and being on a couple of TV shows, what has Amber Tamblyn ever done?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/19 12:09 AM
2

"The Bubble," and the Dave Chappelle election night skit were making fun of WOKE people, but honestly those skits are like the Gillette ad. The people they're making fun of in those skits are SNL's core viewers. That's just another reasons why they do hackneyed bits about conservatives and people in flyover country more than anything else.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:53 AM
-3

Wasn't he a teen actor/singer? A lot of people who were "child stars" reach out to current child stars. I don't see anything weird about it. It's not like he's tweeting at them asking them to back up that bumper so he can slap the junk in the trunk or something.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:25 AM
1

After they told the clerk they could take it outside I thought of something a little different.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 03:42 AM
4

Brockette Lesnar I think you mean... Macho Ma'am Tranny Savage
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 03:32 AM
1

"Stop calling me a man because I quite clearly am not." This one broke my brain and made me laugh until I snorted Diet Dew out of my nose.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/18 12:39 AM
1

Funny how the article leaves out all the allegations about her abusive behavior. If I remember correctly the only reason Johny Depp didn't get completely wrecked like any other accused actor was that Doug Stanhope publicly called Heard out on her lies and shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:39 AM
2

Religious and moral people get mad at politicians of any rank for lesser immoral behavior, but then those hypocrites will turn around and then excuse this behavior because they support their own personal beliefs on anything from immigration to banking. I'm not as religious as I used to be and no longer attend church, but based on the conversations I've had with people who do I'd have to say they don't care if you think they're hypocrites. One guy basically told me he was tired of having people w…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 05:14 AM
6

How many of those convictions and plea deal had anything at all to do with Russia? None of them. Good on Mueller for catching a tax cheat, but he hasn't managed to find a single Russian yet.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 03:26 AM
1

I'll admit that it's shady as fuck, but it's not illegal to have a Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA), nor is it rare for people signing one to get a pay day. So long as Trump used his own money it's not a campaign finance violation. Even if Mueller could make the case that Cohen's involvement makes it a contribution in kind, there's still no guarantee they have anything. John Edwards used campaign funds to buy silence from his mistresses and a jury found him not guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 03:20 AM
63

That whole statement boils down to "we're going to rake this fucker over the coals until he's our bitch and does tricks for our benefit like a trained poodle." Fuck those people. Just one I'd like to see someone get this treatment then come out against the people serving it up.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/18 08:29 PM
2

No one misrepresented anything. You were whining that people link The Daily Mail because you don't like that particular outlet and have it blocked. It's not OPs fault you willingly censor the content you see, and making a spectacle of yourself by virtue signalling about how you're too good to read The Daily Mail, basically admitting that you don't trust yourself to take away whatever worthwhile information is there while discarding the garbage that may exist alongside it, does nothing to add to …
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:42 PM
4

Decides to block a website. Complains when people link to the website they blocked. It's groovy that someone could provide you with an alternative link, but you can either block The Daily Mail and be left in the dark or unblock it and take its content with a grain of salt knowing it's reputation. What you shouldn't do, however, is block it then complain about other people linking to it. You made your choice, and that's fine so long as you remember that you don't decide for everyone.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:41 AM
4

I wasn't sure if he was engaging in "woke 8 year old" or if he was making fun of it. It's definitely gr8 b8 m8.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:53 PM
23

Any avid fisherman will tell you that this is bait.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:27 AM
25

/r/relationships is filled with lonely /r/toomanychromosome users who are too broken to make relationships with people work, so instead they hold multiple cats hostage in an attempt to fill the emotional void their repugnant personalities create. It is not a place to go for any sort of useful advice. It is a great subreddit to troll, however.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:55 AM
2

That is so far from what's happened in this case. Citation needed. There is no mention of any of those things having occurred in the article. I don't expect you to care about facts though That's an odd argument to pull out of your ass in a situation where you're literally arguing we should encourage a middle-schooler to ignore reality and embrace a delusion. Even if it weren't an odd argument in this situation, you've presented no facts. I'm working off of what is contained in the article, which…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 02:54 AM
1

The school, stunningly, allowed the female student to have access to the boys' locker room without so much as informing the male students who would be sharing the locker room with the girl or the students' parents. I don't know how they do English in your neck of the woods, but around these parts the way the apostrophe is used indicates a plural possessive. That means that the parents in question were the parents of any and all of the students, which would include the girl in question. Furthermo…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 02:40 AM
-1

Someone didn't read the article. It very clearly says that parents aren't informed.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 05:20 PM
2

Sounds pretty easy in this case. All you have to do is claim you're the wrong gender, no counseling or anything involved, and they don't even bring guardians in to discuss the issue. If you want people to embrace this gender delusion nonsense you're going to need to treat it a bit more seriously than that.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 05:18 PM
5

In other words, it allows democrats to say "believe all women" while ignoring anyone who accuses someone like Bill Clinton or Keith Ellison.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 05:32 AM
3

That's one way of looking at it, yes. The stupid cunt did create the EPA and reopen diplomacy with China, he wasn't all bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/18 11:51 AM
2

Nixon was actually a very brilliant man. He just lacked scruples, surrounded himself with the wrong people, and made the mistake of being loyal and trying to cover for them when they did something they really shouldn't have.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/18 10:58 AM
5

Those are some strong words coming from a milquetoast republican like Graham. He normally jumps at any chance to be "bipartisan," and here he's calling democrats out.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:01 AM
14

True, but those were Classical Liberals, who were nothing like the modern progressives that make up the democrat party.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:25 PM
3

LOL, don't be silly. This isn't the first time democrats have pulled this kind of nonsense. This is basically a repeat of what they did to Clarence Thomas, only they're putting more effort into it.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:22 AM
5

I think this is projection. Biden knows how he has acted in the past and assumes his abhorrent behavior is perfectly normal and every other man does it, too. This is pretty much typical "male feminist" behavior. Not all rapists are male feminists, but all male feminists are rapists, after all.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:38 AM
3

If you're going to insist on digging a hole, Bob, at least let me lend you a shovel. I can't bear watching you do it the hard way.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:14 PM
2

So 90% of the time and you glom onto 10%. Yes, Bob, in this case I do, and I explained to you why I did. The only bias here is the "skeptic" who refuses to be skeptical of an obviously dubious accusation.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:22 PM
3

You brought up social science. I named her profession, Bob. She's a psychology professor at a college in California. Psychology is a social science, Bob. Do you dispute any of that? If not, I don't care what you think "sounds" stupid. That isn’t predictive Well, that's just, like, your opinion, Bob. Because, like I said in my previous post, if you Google the accuser she's exactly what I surmised she was based on just her location and profession. I don't need a complete data set to make a predict…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:05 PM
2

Don't build straw men and ignore what I actually said, Bob. I didn't say anything about her degree. I noted her profession and location, and even if I hadn't a cursory web search of the accuser pretty much turns up exactly the same kind of caricature to which I was referring. Dig in your heels and whine all you like, Bob, but you're not being the least bit skeptical of the accuser's claims. Anyone who isn't blinded by the salt of losing the last presidential election can see this for what it is.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:27 PM
2

You only consider them "plausible" because you're (and you've made this very obvious in a very short number of posts) anti-Trump and oppose Kavanaugh's confirmation. No rational, objective, fair-minded person would consider these accusations "plausible" as things currently stand. The accuser apparently doesn't even remember what year this alleged incident took place or where it happened. The story has changed at least once regarding the number of people involved/witnessing what happened. The onl…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:04 AM
1

Dr. Ford did put her name behind her claim. Yeah, six months after the fact, and only because vague and anonymous accusations didn't get Kavanaugh the "me too" treatment. Meanwhile, the accuser can't say when or where this allegedly happened, has changed her story at least once, and appears to be a complete partisan. This whole thing reeks of bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:40 AM
1

This is exactly the problem with partisans like yourself. In this out-of-context snippet here Romney is talking about his efforts to find and recruit qualified female candidates for positions in a potential presidential administration. Then he gets raked over the coals for his inarticulate description of how he's trying to do exactly what "feminists" complain republicans never do. This is one of the reasons you're getting fewer and fewer milquetoast moderate republicans like Romney and finding y…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:37 AM
0

hours of Republican senators calling her and evil lying slut I don't recall any of the senators calling Anita Hill an "evil lying slut," and I'm old enough to remember the Clarence Thomas hearings on the nightly news. No one had to call Hill a liar. Her story was so ridiculous that making the accusation would have been little more than an exercise in stating the obvious.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:29 AM
3

I'm quite alright with it because I don't care why you're "alright with it." If you in any way support or condone making false accusations against someone your ethics and morality are questionable at best.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:26 AM
3

The GOP gerrymandered house districts following the 2010 census to give themselves a distinct advantage in house elections A move they copied from democrats, who originated the practice and are only now crying about it because republicans employed it to greater effect than they ever did. Mitch McConnell didn't have a hearing for Merrick Garland's supreme court nomination because "it was an election year" - something that has zero precedent. The Constitution says the senate must advise and consen…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:22 AM
2

Hey, if he's innocent, there's no problem with an investigation. This is the sort of idiotic "if you have nothing to hide why do you care?" argument people make when 4th Amendment protections are discussed. It's also a comment that indicates complete ignorance of how criminal investigations and the justice system work. Also, he's already purjured himself during the senate hearing Horseshit. Senator Leahy accused him of lying about documents he received that Leahy and his fellow democrats put on …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:11 AM
4

Imagine she is telling the truth for a moment. Gee, Bob, that doesn't sound like a very skeptical position to me. Can you think of a reason that isn't political that she would want this? The only way this isn't politically motivated is IF she is telling the truth. I find it difficult to believe she is telling the truth for many reasons, not the least of which is that the story she's been peddling has been inconsistent at best. Her therapists notes say four guys were there, now she says it was ju…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:01 AM
3

How about common knowledge? Have you never known anyone who has applied for a federal job? The federal government performs a background check on every applicant. Kavanaugh has held at least five different federal positions, including federal judge, so the federal government has performed a background check on him five times. Seriously, this isn't rocket surgery. Some things don't require a source. Anyone who has ever applied for a federal position or had a friend/relative apply for a federal pos…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:55 AM
3

I doubt there will be any testimony in this case other than what Kavanaugh offers. The accuser's lawyer said this weekend that she'd testify before congress if asked. Senator Grassley took the bait and invited her to testify. Now the accuser is saying she won't testify unless the FBI investigates. Why would the FBI investigate an allegation of something that happened 40 years ago that doesn't fall under its jurisdiction? I've already seen CNN asking why they won't investigate this since they inv…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:39 AM
5

Don't mind Bob. The worst thing about him is that he's confused the meaning of "skeptical" with the meaning of "paranoid."
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:31 AM
1

Who does she think she is? Roman Polanski?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:50 AM
4

Yeah, because real men remind him of his failings. I'd be annoyed, too, were I him.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:16 AM
1

If you want to make fun of an American sport, baseball would be the best one to bust on. It's like watching paint dry...so pretty much the American equivalent of soccer.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:51 PM
-6

Word
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:45 PM
-8

Soccer might as well be synchronized swimming. All our good athletes play real sports.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:06 PM
-13

We don't "suck" at soccer. We choose not to play it. All our good athletes play real sports.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 08:43 PM
1

Heinlein, among others, wouldn't be able to win a Hugo if he were writing today. The writers who made the Hugo awards something to aspire to are now held in contempt by the people who essential control the award. Google "sad puppies" and "Hugo" together. Make sure you visit the websites of authors like Larry Correia if they come up in your search.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:32 AM
12

Thank you, that's all I needed.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 09:11 AM
50

I was going to assume from the body mass and neon hair dye that the chicks were Tumbler Warriors Against Traditional Society or some other sort of leftist protesters, but I couldn't figure out what the guy's deal was, so I didn't want to jump too far for my conclusions.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 08:37 AM
66

No, it's really not. Why did the chick in red spit on the dude? Who is the dude? I can safely assume the second chick, the one that tried to tackle the guy, is with the first one, but are they part of a group or something? Why are the police there? When I ask "What's the context here, OP," what I'm really saying is "what the fuck is going on in this gif?"
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 08:22 AM
67

What's the context here, OP?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 07:20 AM
9

Do these people lack imagination? Shaun King, who many refer to as "Talcum X," is so imaginative that he's a white man who really and truly seems to believe he's black. The only thing really surprising here is that someone so far inside the social justice camp actually wrote a story about false accusations.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:35 AM
3

I'm talking about present time not 70 years ago or whatever. So am I. The Daily Stormer is/was a White Supremacist website. I say "is/was" because I don't know what their current status is. They started having problems keeping hosts last August. Today if you say it's published print so it can target a gender that's bullshit cause illegal doesn't care about what kind of print it is. it's illegal to attack a class of people. This rag of a magazine isn't fit as emergency toilet paper. I'm not sure …
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:48 AM
4

You do realize the Daily Stormer is/was a thing, right?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:02 AM
17

Doesn't apply here, as it's protected speech in a print publication.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 06:29 PM
2

1: Tweets don't do anything. Call your state/federal congressional reps, make them aware of the situation, and ask them what they plan to do about it. 2: This isn't an appropriate sub for this content. There may even be members of this community who are in favor or addressing men's issues but don't support 2nd Amendment rights, as strange as that may seem. There are a lot of gun subreddits that would probably appreciate this post. KiA might like it because there's a definite censorship/abuse of …
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:29 AM
34

That's a pretty sad situation. Too bad she didn't take her husband and herself to marriage counseling instead of going on a radio show. This is something they need to work out. If they can't, then they need to part ways. It's really not fair to either of them for the situation to continue the way it is.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:47 PM
83

I don't care about her now.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/18 06:42 PM
7

brought to you by the DNC Funny you mention that, because when I saw the headline my first thought was "It doesn't say republican congressman's wife arrested in the headline. They're going to reveal it's a democrat somewhere in the article." I was actually surprised it wasn't buried deeper than the second paragraph.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/18 01:49 AM
5

NOT CREEPY UNCLE JOE!!!!
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:39 AM
34

No surprise. This is like many other groups who used free speech in the middle of the last century to advance their causes. Once they got their way and eventually became "the man," they decided that they didn't want anyone using their own tools against them.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:20 AM
2

Funny that all the "hate speech" is somehow on on right-leaning subreddits, LOL.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:40 AM
0

It would be impossible to waste something with so little value.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:49 PM
2

What the fuck are you on about, you neanderthal? Did i say he is not a Mexican? No, i said he is not a man of color. Typical post-mod liberal -- no fucking brains. LOL, nice one. You respond like that and someone else is a "neanderthal." That's comedy gold, Jerry. Comedy gold!!!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:57 AM
1

Not all Mexicans are short, brown-skinned people. He's still Mexican, and an immigrant to the US, even if he doesn't fit into whatever handy little stereotype you're using.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:27 PM
3

Tweets aren't news. Writing articles like this one should be grounds for the death sentence.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:25 PM
1

No, it wasn't. The NLRB never ruled on Damore's complaint because he withdrew it to focus on the class action suit he's joining. This isn't an NLRB decision, it's an opinion one of their lawyers wrote in preparation for hearing the complaint.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:08 PM
1

Oh honey. It always puzzles me that liberals, especially Reddit liberals, talk about people in the South as if they're part of an entirely different and inferior species, but for some odd reason think it's cool to try to mimic their mannerisms and speech. It’s definitely Trump that said that. That's exactly my point, you daft git. No one was talking about Trump. You were complaining that the Director of the CDC couldn't be trusted. Why? The fuck if I know, because you never say. You just keep co…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/18 09:48 PM
1

We talking about the guy who’s on tape saying “grab her by the p*ssy”? I wasn't aware that Brenda Fitzgerald, the Director of the CDC, was a guy, though I guess I shouldn't assume xir gender, or that she (he?) had made any recorded comments about grabbing pussy.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/18 11:22 PM
1

U: Source please Other guy: Here you go U: Well, Trump probably still did it What's the point in asking for a source if you're just going to dismiss it and continue to gobble up bullshit?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/18 05:37 PM
2

I'm sure I could make a list if were inclined to research the issue, but off the top of my head Sarah Silverman told the Bernie crowd to shut up and go away at the last Democrat convention. I'm sure if you scrolled the social media feeds if female comedians you wouldn't have any problem finding some of them saying certain topics should be off limits.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/18 05:33 PM
1

Too civilize a punishment for such an offense. We should drag OP out into the street and beat them to death in front of their children. LOL J/K, we all know anyone that would make a post this terrible has never had sex. We beat them to death in front of their parents, who will probably be grateful that their embarrassment is finally at an end.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/18 02:44 PM
4

His lawyers will push him to settle. I hope he doesn't. I don't think that will be the case. I got the impression this was a "let's make a point" lawsuit, not a "show me the money" lawsuit. On top of that, this is a class action suit. That means Jame Damore isn't the only litigant. They won't be able to throw money at Damore to make it go away unless they throw money at everyone else.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 01:05 AM
11

I'm sure that was one of the many tales she told while trying to wriggle out of Sony's grasp, but I don't put a lot of faith in what anyone who testifies to one thing under oath then changes their story later when it benefits them.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/17 09:13 AM
132

Given her history this was an incredibly good call on Seinfeld's part. She accused her producer of sexual misconduct in a bid to get out of her recording contract so she could move on and get a better deal after having testified under oath that they'd never had any sexual contact. It ruined the guy's career, and so far she's still stuck at Sony under the terms of her original contract.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/17 12:05 AM
4

And the Dems walked into it Dems walked into it, not because they were trying to take down Trump and Moore, but because they have supported the ridiculous "listen and believe" nonsense. They have to throw everyone who gets accused under the bus regardless of the quality of the accusation. Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, and most moderates have vocally disagreed with "listen and believe" and aren't trapped in the same Catch-22, so they're free to point out problems with the "accusers" s…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 10:40 PM
1

What we should be discussing is men's rights. We are. The position Takei has taken, that accusers must be believed and any defense is "gaslighting," stands in stark contrast to due process rights. His current predicament should demonstrate to him and others just how wrong that position is.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:42 PM
1

I don't know if he is or not, but apparently they were credible enough for Fox to put its cash cow out to pasture even before this metoo stuff turned into a full-blown witch-hunt after Weinstein.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:41 AM
1

Anyone who is being fair will consider every one independently. Franken has admitted he has been inappropriate and apologized. I don't know much about the Conyers situation. Bill O'Reilly, by most accounts, deserved to be fired. Roy Moore denies his accusations and there are problems with his accusers, not that the media puts much spotlight on them. I don't think any of the four said any of the things that Takei has on the subject of sexual conduct, though, and that's why watching Takei be judge…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:57 AM
3

That wasn't the point. It's not about Takei's politics. It's about how he engages in them. He has been a very vocal proponent of such things as "listen and believe." He has very clearly articulated the idea that if you're accused, you're guilty, and if you argue that you're not you're harming your accuser. Now he's been accused, and for whatever reason what he has said in the past doesn't apply in his situation. He's being hoisted by his own petard, and engaging in a little schadenfreude while w…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:28 AM
10

Jake Tapper let her have it on Twitter.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:50 AM
75

Damn, Jake Tapper laid the verbal pimp hand down on that one. He's 100% right that she wouldn't be the one footing the bill for the "price she's willing to pay."
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/17 09:03 AM
8

That's by design. It's referred to as the Duluth Model.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/17 08:03 AM
3

WaPo's story is already starting to unravel. The original article spent several paragraphs strongly implying, if not outright stating, that the women in question weren't partisans. Then a news outlet in Alabama found out that wasn't really the case.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 03:41 AM
1

Well...
/r/MensRights11/11/17 03:34 AM
2

I regret that I have but one upvote to give for such an exquisite use of the musical tempo markings.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:23 AM
17

Yeah, it amazes me that Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama are "style icons" but now that we have a first lady who was/is a runway model the media says her every outfit is a disaster.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:59 AM
1

Depends on how you look at it. If you've never seen it before it's new to you, but this has been floating around Reddit since I first starting posting.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/17 07:13 AM
3

Oh, no, this one's real. It's a Reddit classic. Pops up every now and again. If I remember correctly, she deleted this post and eventually went full retard.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/17 03:27 AM
1

It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:47 AM
1

I'm sure the Irish-Catholic voters in Boston are just chomping at the bit to elect a...candidate with their unique background.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:03 PM
12

If the victims history is allowed then the defendants history should also be allowed. The state/prosecutor is tasked with proving their case based on established facts, not running a smear campaign. No defense introduces the "victim's" (I notice you didn't say "alleged victim") history for any reason other than its relevance. For example, if the defense shows that the "victim" has a history of making such complaints, or has made a false complaint in the past, it raises doubt that the defendant a…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:29 AM
12

We figured this would have to do until Mother Jones decided to cover the story. /s Or maybe you'd prefer we take a page from /r/politics and get a ShareBlue link?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 01:49 PM
1

I haven't heard anything terrible about Gitbucket or Gitlab yet.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:38 AM
20

Yea, github seems like they normally are good about these kinds of things That doesn't jive with my memory. If I recall correctly (and I may not), Github had a big social justice blowup that involved either setting up or changing their 'Code of Conduct' that sent a lot of users looking for a different repository. Oh, and nonsense like this... One insider criticized GitHub's "social impact team," which is in charge of figuring out how to use the product to tackle social issues, including diversit…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:30 AM
2

Someone should show up in a dress and full beard, tell them they identify as a woman, and demand a ticket. Please record the hilarity that is sure to ensue.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:45 AM
36

It's the sane, well-adjusted version of going REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/17 03:48 PM
2

So, you oppose something that might be very good for everyone in society at the end of the day because it's associated with nazis? No, I oppose a ridiculously flawed bit of thinking by pointing out that it's already been the impetus for barbarous, inhumane behavior in the past that I would prefer not to see replicated in any way in the future.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:16 AM
6

Rouge employee? I doubt their color had anything to do with it.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:23 AM
0

LOL, I think you just redeemed yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 11:43 PM
8

Does Palin not count as a woman? Well, she's a conservative, so...no, not to most feminists.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:49 PM
14

Trump exercising his own rights to speech and free association to deny media outlets access or a platform isn't even remotely close fascism. Unless I've missed something about brownshirts following journalists home or reporters hauled off to jail never to be seen again, the idea that Trump is a fascist is just juvenile hyperbole.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 06:44 AM
28

I'd be fine with it if it were an endorsement of traditionalism, but it's not. It's an endorsement that men continue to live up to expectations that no longer provide any sort of reward because if they don't it's not fair to women. A traditionalist view might say something similar, but the underlying theme(s) of a traditionalist would at least imply that the whole system is now fucked because we've strayed away from things that have worked for society for hundreds if not thousands of years. This…
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:43 AM
2

This was written by Norm McDonald's brother, and he's actually a fairly decent columnist.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:27 AM
15

I believe that the correct response to this question is...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 12:59 PM
189

As someone who identifies as an attack helicopter, I can assure you that I was assembled by the military-industrial complex.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 10:15 AM
54

She talks about women not being CEO's Yet not a word about a lack of representation among common laborers, construction workers, garbage collectors, or sanitation workers...I wonder why that is?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 10:14 AM
3

You obviously have never been outside a major city if you think it's just our black friends and neighbors who have unusual dialects and affectations.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/17 04:21 AM
8

Do you still feel like sunlight is the best disinfectant now, Maher?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:18 AM
16

Yeah, this is a Reddit classic. It's been around for years.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 02:19 AM
2

Regrettably, the top tier politician's are still overwhelmingly male. Why is that regrettable?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:38 AM
68

It's funny how these guys scream "Punch a Nazi!" or "Bash the Fash!," form mobs to beat people up, and otherwise pretend to be hard but scatter like roaches when the lights come on when someone shows up ready for the throwdown they say they want.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 07:27 AM
33

Yeah, I don't think many people realize that the flip side of "never punch a lady" is "behave like a lady."
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 05:05 AM
2

Judging from that missive, someone is a fan of sarcastic Winston Churchill replies.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:21 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:04 AM
1

I did go to college.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:03 AM
0

Maybe some of them do believe that. It still looks to me like all the wailing and gnashing of teeth is because they're sore losers. At least they aren't setting things on fire today.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:43 AM
-1

That's possible. It's just more likely that this is yet another tantrum from a group of people who are going through the grieving process because they lost the election and can't move beyond denial and/or bargaining.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:00 AM
-1

When a huge group of people get together for a good cause, especially for peace, human rights, and solidarity, the last thing I would do is shit on it. I'd agree with that if I thought today's shenanigans were aimed at such things. Maybe I'm a cynic, but today's events seem more like a "fuck Trump and his supporters" gathering that is using women as window dressing.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 02:41 AM
-3

A lot of us work Saturdays, dingus. I'm at work right now.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 02:36 AM
13

voting against their own economic self interest, Ever since the first time I heard the "voting against their interest" argument I've thought that only the most tone-deaf elitist could utter those word without irony. The idea that the person saying those words could know better than the voter they're talking about what is in that voter's interests is laughable. How vain and/or self-righteous does a person have to be to think they can run another person's life better? It's like anyone who says "co…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:39 AM
268

She straight away goes full anti white, anti male, and tries to divide people more. The exact opposite of what she said before the election results. That's because before the election results started coming in her side was winning, so everyone needed to come together in unity under their leadership. The minute it was obvious Trump was the victor unity, healing, and restoration went right out the window because while she expected everyone to bend the knee to her candidate there was no way in hell…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 05:03 AM
13

About 20 minutes after...I just listened to Trump's victory speech. He was incredibly conciliatory, complimented Secretary Clinton, and promised he would be "everyone's president." It was a much more eloquent Donald Trump than the one we've seen the last few months.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 08:09 AM
7

since she is not conceding tonight I just heard on the radio that CNN is reporting that she has called Trump to concede privately.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:44 AM
7

To be clear, false rape claims are disgusting as well, but terrible person to make a point about this. The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all. --H. L. Mencken
/r/MensRights05/11/16 09:02 PM
17

The Red Pill. It's a subreddit you have to experience to believe. Mainly because it's hard to believe there are that many guys who still have their balls and aren't rolling over for bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 05:07 PM
-7

Yeah, I read it. My point stands. This isn't a pussy pass. This was someone taking the "easy way" out. She considered death a mercy and offed herself. The pass was not denied, if it had been she'd be serving her sentence crying herself to sleep in a cell every night for the rest of her life.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/16 02:26 AM
12

This isn't a pussy pass. This is just sad. The denial of the pussy pass would have been her serving her sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/16 01:45 AM
1

Well played, sir. Well played.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:25 AM
-5

That's only because the people around you are tactful enough to call you an idiot behind your back.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:39 AM
2

No great loss. That's just a bunch of edgy teenage tankies sitting around spewing nonsense about "the revolution" that will never happen because they're all a bunch of shiftless cowards who would run crying from any kind of actual physical conflict.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:06 AM
2

This is brilliant. Trump's campaign is clearly running the same kind of divisive, identity-politics laden campaign democrats usually run against republicans. Democrats are losing their mind because, while they're very good at running those types of campaigns, they've never had to defend themselves from one before and it's clear they have no idea how to respond. This ploy in particular is genius. Not only does Trump's campaign score a point on the refugee issue, scoring that point kicked off a de…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:16 AM
50

I like how she chopped up the video as if no one would notice and realize that it was probably because the cop was calling her a moron. I like how she called the guy a "redneck" but he was chasing her in an Audi. Clearly, you can't be anything other than a dumb hick if you support Trump as far as she's concerned.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/16 11:38 PM
1

I guess many people don't like listening to people who are obviously smarter than they are? The re-election of Bartlett in West Wing struggled with this since Bartlett was very smart and a Nobel prize receipient so it must be real :-)("Let Bartlett be Bartlett"). Talk show people have to appeal to a wide audience, this would mean they have to play to the low end of their hoped-for-audience. I absolutely love that you support your argument with anecdotal evidence from the realm of television fict…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 07:36 AM
1

How about - less than 5% of the UKs top companies have female CEOs? Why's that? I'm always amused at how feminists are so busy looking up at the glass ceiling that they never bother to look down at the glass floor. Men do all the shit jobs that actually make society work. Come back when you're as concerned that there aren't as many female miners and garbage collectors as you are that there aren't as many women in the cushy, enviable positions that everybody wants.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/16 07:11 AM
7

There should be more Meghan Trainor in that subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/16 11:02 PM
7

I'm pretty sure he wasn't the first.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/16 10:02 AM
2

OMG YES
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/16 05:48 AM
5

"You don't know what I've been through!" ...and even if I did, I wouldn't care, because I'm a schmuck with $250,000, baby, whoooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/16 05:13 AM
0

I'd argue that any time a pussy pass is denied justice is served.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/16 05:11 AM
2

How so? He was in a public place. It's not like they came into the restroom and took pictures over the stall walls of him taking a shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 12:53 PM
0

Or, in my opinion, starved: since I do not think any head to head counter to feminism will work due to biological favoring of women backed up by massive social pressure, the way to win is to simply disengage and let the movement wither once deprived of a critical mass of men, who have and will always be the primary producers. Who is John Galt?
/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:37 AM
14

Frankly, Trump's own remarks and behavior invited this sort of thing. Yes, clearly he was asking for it dressing like that and walking in that neighborhood late at night by doing things with which you disagree.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:32 AM
12

Isn't it funny how you have to read almost all the way through the article before they mention her political party affiliation? If she'd been a republican it would have been titled or started with "republican attorney general, Kathleen Kane, guilty on all counts."
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/16 09:59 PM
2

I love when I get one of those. I always make up something ridiculous to put in to screw up their poll. This one asked me what company I think of when I think of insurance, so I put "Bob's Discount Indemnity."
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/16 09:52 AM
17

I wanna buy this guy a steak dinner and drink a beer with him.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/16 12:39 AM
10

when the person you're arguing with decides the experts in the subject of the argument aren't credible there's no amount of facts that will change your mind. Let's not forget that those "experts" are more often wrong in the prognostications than they are right. Remember when Brexit was going to crash the economy? After the initial losses from people selling off due to uncertainty the markets have made steady gains. The only "economy" that's going to be enriched during a Clinton administration is…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:26 AM
6

I think you mean Dr. Nick.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:31 AM
2

Dan Abrams looks like a slightly less flamboyant Paul Feig (and after seeing the suits that Feig chooses to wear do not tell me he isn't flamboyant). That is one smug, douchey, punchable face.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:58 PM
1

"This chick" in this article, is divorcing her husband, who has cancer, because she thinks she can get more out of a divorce settlement than she'll get out of his will. The husband is dying and instead of supporting him and standing by him she's looking out for her financial interests. It's not that different than Gingrich, who divorced his wife, who had cancer, for a younger woman, instead of standing by her and supporting her until she either recovered or died. I'm not sure why you had to have…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:49 PM
1

I CAN'T BE OUTRAGED IF I HAVE TO WAIT FOR FACTS! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:55 AM
1

Yeah, I know, that was the point. Just like this chick is ditching this guy because he has cancer and she thinks she'll get a better deal out of a divorce than a will.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 04:55 AM
1

Remember when many people (rightly) said Newt Gingrich was a giant scumbag for divorcing his wife for a younger woman after she'd been diagnosed with cancer? I wonder if any of those people will have the same opinion in this case?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:19 AM
2

Laurie Penny complaining about someone generally indicates that person has decent character and sound judgment. If I were running for elected office I'd be tempted to pay her to say disparaging things about me.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:10 PM
6

the most progressive, law-abiding group of men in the world. Feminists find it easy to shit on western men precisely because they don't have to worry about them tossing acid on them, hacking them to pieces, or throwing stones at them when they criticize and belittle them. They won't say anything negative about Islam because they know what will happen.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:30 AM
12

Because that's traditionally where you go to meet a husband that will be able to comfortably support you and give you social status, duh.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:33 PM
2

The response to this will likely be: 3:24 of internalized misogyny. --Defenders of the new Girlbusters film
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/16 06:27 AM
-1

Maybe, but when the issue is age and not body weight it makes little difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/16 04:59 AM
2

The problem here is that people are treating seriously the complaints of people who are either ignorant or complete idiots. Based on the trailers I've seen for this movie it appears they are making Mystique either the lead protagonist or the emotional center of this movie. This ad is a classic "hero in peril" piece that's supposed to create suspense to draw in an audience. The villain is literally holding the hero's life in his hands. They have given the people who are complaining what they say …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:00 AM
-5

Preventive medicine is so prevalent because it saves money in the long run. Since the bulk of the money spent on the average person's healthcare is spent in their declining years I'm not sure how this computes.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/16 12:23 AM
11

I agree...she should have tossed the mom in the klink for contempt and assigned custody to the father while the mother was confined while the kids received counseling.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:52 AM
3

Yes, of course, we should all emulate the good graces of the man calling people objecting to men's issues in our society whiny, entitled, conspiracy nutjobs.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:10 AM
5

I see the author's picture. My brain processes it and comes up with "soulless ginger Danny DeVito minus wit and charm."
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:10 PM
5

The most disturbing part of this video is hearing that 5 million people follow Piers Morgan. If that's not evidence that humanity is doomed I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:16 AM
8

This guy's right that this is kind of a silly, do-it-for-the-children moral panic. What he's missing is that the Obama Administration is pushing this a lot farther than bathrooms. The geniuses at the Department of Education put out yet another "Dear Colleague" letter and the way it reads makes it sound like this will extend from restrooms to showers and locker rooms. Where do we come down when some girl doesn't want to use the facilities designated for her when there's some guy who is either leg…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:04 PM
8

I wouldn't count on it. Every time someone has said "it can never happen" with Trump in the last nine months whatever they were saying could never happen immediately happened. "He'll drop out after Iowa." "He won't last halfway through the primaries." "He won't win enough delegates to avoid a contested convention." "He can't win the republican nomination." Now the same people who uttered these phrases are saying "he can't win the general election." If everything someone said to you was wrong wou…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/16 06:53 AM
5

Well, these were normal people in a social setting doing their best to get along and not make an ass of themselves. That really doesn't apply to 99% of the people we see in posts on this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/16 06:49 AM
8

That's true, but it's funny how wrong the people discussing demographics have been about how those consistent voting blocks would respond to Trump, isn't it?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:47 AM
14

You could argue this has already happened, his reputation has been damaged beyond repair with many demographics. ...you say in response to a speech where he says something like this and has women applauding him. There are no "demographics," only individuals, and the people who are telling you his "reputation has been damaged beyond repair with many demographics" have said so at least once a week since the republican primaries started. They've based every one of their failed predictions on that l…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:58 AM
51

If I had a dollar for every time someone said "Donald Trump can't /won't" something or that one of his remarks was "the end of his campaign" and was wrong I'd have almost as much money as Donald Trump.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:43 AM
-10

Well, considering this is Charlie Sheen we're talking about I could almost understand if there's an enormous amount of money spent on counseling and psychological help so that these kids can avoid becoming their father, but I'm pretty sure you could manage that for a lot less than $10k monthly.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:57 PM
-8

I would grant you that the comparison could be made, but Lebensraum wasn't about moving people out of dense population areas into new ones. It was about nationalism, racism, and conquest. I don't think the Israelis have a literal policy of expanding into new areas and killing off and starving out the old population. I do believe some of their policy decisions have been ill-advised. I'm not an apologist for Israel or its population. I just happen to believe that the whole unfortunate situation ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/16 12:34 AM
-15

It's a very complicated issue. I'm sure the Israelis feel that their expanding population has to have somewhere to live. I'm sure the Palestinians see it as adding insult to injury. They're both right. At the end of the day, no matter the arguments between them, there are no simple solutions and the situation only exists because Europe was run by a bunch of Jew-hating morons. They didn't learn from the first "Final Solution" just how bad an idea a Final Solution really was and came up with a sec…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 11:35 PM
-26

I personally think Finkelstein's kind of a twat who, despite his impressive credentials, does get the Israeli/Palestinian situation all wrong. His comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany is intentionally offensive and ignores a lot of context. The situation in Israel is what happens when you take a people who just went through a genocide, put guns in their hands, and tell them someone else's stuff now belongs to them. That isn't the fault of the people in Israel, it's the fault of Europeans who for…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 11:07 PM
34

That just begets the same thing more and more. Take the high-ground. I disagree. On top of that, "taking the high ground" is an expression that, like many others, derives from military experience/theory. When you hold the high ground your adversaries are at a disadvantage. When you hold the high ground your adversaries don't have the opportunity to inflict their nonsense on you. Anyone who disagrees with this woman has no "high ground" and are at a disadvantage on several fronts. She has the "pr…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 06:09 PM
1

I can understand why after seeing the video. I think Fields is exaggerating at least a little bit but there was clearly some physical contact. Lewindowsky is a campaign official, not security, and should leave the physical stuff to the Secret Service. I don't think he needs to be charged and Fields should have let it go, but when you refuse to apologize and claim you dindu nuffin instead of trying to amicably deal with the situation this is what happens.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:05 AM
23

"Indeed, the backlash was so great that Lyons’s band members 'decided to leave the band after threats [were] supposedly aimed at both their families and employers.'" It's funny how "listen and believe" goes out the window the minute the it's an enemy of the Fempire alleging people are mistreating them.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 06:18 AM
15

She was speaking metaphorically, in part to highlight how hyperbolic Kesha's claims were.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:08 AM
1

Maybe, but I think the answer is improving the checks and balances, not allowing appeals to run for 20 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/16 08:39 AM
7

Only because we give every convict umpteen appeals. There needs to be checks and balances in the system, but we take it a little too far sometimes.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/16 06:39 AM
1

I don't disagree with you, but that doesn't change the fact that her name is available if you dig for it.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:32 PM
1

She isn't. Her name is out there if you look for it.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:20 AM
17

full bukake of justice on her face You, good sir/ma'am, are a skilled phrase-maker.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:22 AM
10

I mean disruption is a dick move, but you can't say "I have a right to free speech in this zone, but you don't. I can assemble here, but you can't." I'd agree if these things happened in spaces open to the general public, but Trump's campaign pays for these venues. He can toss who he wants, just like Reddit does.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:06 AM
3

There was a time I'd have advocated the paper as a relic of journalistic integrity There was a time I'd have done the same. I refer to it as "before I started paying attention." The New York Times, like any other media outlet, has never been fair or impartial. It is little more than an extension of the democrat party, just as Fox News is little more than an extension of the republican establishment. Worse, the NYT sets the tone for what you find in the rest of the left-leaning media in this coun…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:33 PM
2

This isn't surprising. Progress on reform is often hampered by the people making money off the corruption in the system being reformed. Bar associations are the reasons we haven't had meaningful tort reform at the federal level, and they are very powerful groups because a majority of elected officials are lawyers.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:56 AM
2

She consented to sex, not to pregnancy. In which case the same applies to her partner. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:20 AM
0

I'm completely in favor of abortion with reasonable restrictions, but this is a nonsense argument. My being in the hospital doesn't invite someone to take my blood. Two people engaging in sex does invite pregnancy, even when methods are used to lessen the possibility of pregnancy. Much like landlord/tenant law, you can't just give someone the boot without due process if you've invited them in, which is exactly what a woman has done with the fetus by engaging in sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:27 AM
32

As the young lady in a certain taco product commercial might say, "Why not both?"
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:19 AM
2

Ewww, no...think about how that would smell.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:06 AM
2

Or maybe they thought it was an appropriate satire mocking how men are no longer valued in society unless they adopt and display some unusual sociopolitical identity.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:02 AM
0

I'm kind of curious how a man would bear children. Now, if it had said "Man not liable to pay for kids he did not sire: Indian High Court," it would make a little more sense.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:52 AM
6

Does she often trip over her own words? Does the Pope shit in the woods?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/16 01:44 AM
6

Not really, the judge citing him does nothing to repair the damage done to his relationship with his daughter or pull his son out of a downward spiral. Having the judge read what he wrote to acknowledge just how right he was is a Pyrrhic victory.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:31 PM
126

The mods over at /r/Music locked their Ke$ha thread over "victim blaming." For some people, it's all Feels>Reals.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:09 AM
24

I'm sure you can thank Mattress Girl, "Jackie," and all the other high profile false accusers for this one. Finally, feminism is doing something to help men, even if it's doing so unintentionally.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:27 AM
10

Don't get too excited, she's the same moron who invited Mattress Girl to a State of the Union, and she's helped push the insane abuse of Title IX that's led to the Kangaroo Court system of sexual assault hearings that are seriously stacked against young men.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 02:24 PM
3

Looks like the blind squirrel found a nut.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 02:22 PM
9

Welcome to Room 101, Mr. Smith...how many fingers am I holding up?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:44 AM
23

Wil Wheaton syndrome.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:15 AM
3

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Mahatma Gandhi --Michael Scott
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:06 AM
1

After all the bullshit I've seen regarding bridesmaids, I would have assumed that taffeta would be the culprit.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:57 AM
10

I'm sure there were women who were attacked who weren't misandrists though. What did those women do to oppose the ones that were, though? You talk as if men have an obligation to protect women from violent immigrants. What about the flip side of that coin where women have an obligation to protect men from unreasonable feminists?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:56 AM
2

I'm pretty sure whatever he did to earn a medal of honor far outweighs banging the hell out of Sarah Palin's semi-literate daughter, especially since a lot of people would nail her given the chance.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:29 AM
3

She's might be saying she's accepting responsibility and asking for forgiveness, but people who accept responsibility don't say ""I’m so thankful that he did not press charges, that he did not have me arrested." She's not saying, "I'm so thankful my inappropriate behavior didn't land me in jail." She's talking like the guy would have been an unreasonable asshole to have the cops cart her off to jail. She's not the least bit sorry about what she did. She's sorry she was caught doing it and has to…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:57 AM
4

I'm 43 and my fiancee is 27, so your age range calculation seems about right. When I said "what is obviously my socially acceptable age range" I was basing what was "obviously acceptable" on the reaction from friends and family. Friends my own age (or at least their wives) were...not supportive, and my family joked about it.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:59 AM
5

Brevity is the soul of wit and you just summed up what I said more succinctly than I did. Kudos.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/16 12:33 AM
23

I think that's really what this charge is all about. Despite the predictable support from the peanut gallery that is the faculty her viral video did serious damage to the school's image and created a political shitstorm. I would guess that she was asked to leave gracefully but she's probably an obstinate jackass and believes she's in the right. Instead of bowing out gracefully and quietly shuffling off to another institution (and there are plenty of left-wing extremists in academia who would mak…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/16 06:52 PM
3

That kind of social capital is like any other kind of capital. I could have all the money in the world but if I want to buy candy and have a preference for chocolates I'm shit out of luck if the only thing for sale is peanut brittle. You may be right that I am "in the driver's seat," but only because I started dating outside of what is obviously my socially acceptable age range.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:38 PM
19

makes you wonder whether there are any sane single women out there anymore It gets worse as you get older. I had to start dating younger women because everyone single I met who was my own age was a bundle of anger, entitlement, and bitterness. I am currently engaged to a very wonderful person but I never would have met her if I hadn't ignored the snide comments about "robbing the cradle" many of my friends and family made when I decided single women my own age weren't worth the effort.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:55 AM
3

Thanks for clearing that up. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/16 02:25 AM
1

Well, she's at least my age (early 40s) and spent a lot of time out in the elements. Considering that picture's a mug shot she's not doing too badly.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/16 04:51 AM
37

I kind of feel like the same people who talk about Dunham's "success," which, let's be honest, is only because of her family connections, are the same people who want to say Donald Trump's success doesn't count because he came from money. She's making some bank, and good for her, but the coffers are being filled by cronyism not any kind of real success.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:06 AM
78

How would Lena Dunham know? Her "success" is a media illusion.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:25 AM
2

I'm just glad no innocent young man's life was ruined... ...this time.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:21 AM
5

WaPo doesn't need to identify her. Her identity is already out and anyone interested in finding it just needs to do a google search.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:53 PM
-13

The search result is linked in the post to which you responded. You being too dumb to click on it isn't me copping out, it's you being too stupid for the fucking internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/16 01:03 AM
-17

How the fuck is that a cop out? There's literally a Bill Burr "here's some shit women do" thread at least once every three months. That's just the ones that get caught in Reddit's notoriously bad search feature. There are probably at least a few that were missed. I like Bill Burr and I like how he calls out typical female bullshit, but there's no pussy pass being denied in any of these videos.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/16 12:20 AM
-26

Some variation of this has been posted several times in the past. You just have to use the search feature to find it.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/16 09:42 PM
-62

Could we just put a link for this in the sidebar? If it's going to be reposted every few weeks for Karma we might as well just leave it up in some way and avoid the hassle.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/16 09:24 PM
1

I've asked the same question about the panels on Bill Mahar's shows since the 90s.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:30 AM
1

She seems like such a nice young lady. It's a shame she's been brainwashed by a nutty cult.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:34 AM
2

That's all we can ask, bro. Thanks for your response.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:34 AM
1

Yeah, that's probably it...and why no link to the original in comments?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:54 AM
7

As bad as the original is this is somehow worse. I can't quite put my finger on what it is. I mean, I agree with what you're saying, but it's just so...I dunno.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:07 AM
5

It's a Brave New World, Mr. Huxley, come enjoy it with us.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 06:27 AM
1

If you wet the bed and watch Arthur while drawing messy pictures with crayons and markers when you're 40, there's something wrong with you... STOP JUDGING ME, KARL.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:21 PM
2

There should already be serious questions about the people behind this "documentary." One of the crew was caught editing Wikipedia to make wiki entries conform more closely to the film's narrative.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:55 AM
3

All those excuses for women to be doing it that would be laughed at if a guy used them.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:58 PM
1

Most people can't see their own flaws and bad habits.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:13 AM
-5

I'm not sure what to think of this thread. A bunch of you are spouting nonsense about "safe spaces." Please stop adopting and enabling that kind of thinking. There are no "safe spaces" in public and creating the expectation that there should be is how we end up with spaces designed to exclude men and treat us as a bunch of predators. The gay community, or at least activists working on its behalf, has spent decades trying to mainstream itself and be accepted by the rest of society. You can't say …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:26 AM
91

As he should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/15 03:29 PM
1

There were so many sick burns in those comments that the Shriner's Hospitals have set up a support hotline. You can reach it by calling 1-888-CRY-MORE
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/15 11:27 PM
2

NO, MAN, YOU SEE, THE COLORS COME WITH VOICES, AND THEY TELL ME THINGS AND THEY'RE GOOD LISTENERS AND WOW IT'S REALLY WARM IN HERE I LOVE THIS SWEATER. ARE THOSE NACHOS? I LOVE NACHOS. I NEED A DRINK. IS THIS WATER? THIS WATER IS AMAZING. I DIDN'T KNOW WATER COULD EVER BE THIS GOOD. IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE WATER? JESUS CHRIST LOOK AT ALL THESE COLORS.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:57 AM
1

I think what she means when she's talking about his attitude is that, in her mind, she was just being clear about expectations and that he needed clear consent to put moves on. Then she should, especially as a "rape crisis coordinator" or whatever she is, work on her communication skills. If she'd have shot me that text I'd have had the same reaction the guy in her story did. She has issues, and she has my sympathy, but if you want other people to like you and spend time with you don't make your…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:30 AM
2

Maybe it'd be funny he she was the perfect stereotype, a rainbow-haired 200 pound woman with Problem Glasses. But this woman looks perfectly normal. Somehow looking normal makes it worse, like you saw a bowl of Sweet Tarts at a party, grabbed a handful and tossed them in your mouth, then realized this is the wrong kind of party and JESUS CHRIST LOOK AT ALL THESE COLORS.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:25 AM
3

I listen to Rush on and off, and heard his Friday show. Steinem saying that was the highlight of his day.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:53 AM
4

The top minds over at SRS I can only imagine what that looks like.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 07:57 AM
2

"How dare you accuse of raping women! Everyone knows we're pedophiles!"
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:53 AM
4

Hopefully we can look back in five years and say this is the moment these idiots jumped the shark.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:02 PM
13

Didn't you hear? You're not allowed to do that anymore! They call it "sealioning." These people don't care about civil discourse. To them polite, intellectual conversation is a tool of The Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:59 AM
14

Holy shit... I was gaslighted and forced into so called mental "help" once and it was anything but. I was surrounded by mysoginist doctors trying to force their patriarchal control on me. ...that is some 9/11-Truther "Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams" next-level crazy. If that poster isn't a Poe or a Troll they do need serious mental help. That is schizophrenic high on weed with no sleep for three days paranoid right there.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/15 11:03 AM
8

The #gamergate community is at odds with exactly the same kind of people, if not the exact same people, who dismiss men's rights as unnecessary, reactionary, misogynist, etc. Even if one does not find this to be a "men's rights" issue, it bears watching.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:45 AM
7

Thank God the adults finally came back in the room.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:40 AM
17

And probably also the ones that choose to do it of their own free will.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:42 AM
103

Of course feminists want to bury these before they're even developed. It would destroy women's social capital and make it so that women would honestly be judged on the basis of their personality and abilities. The whole point of modern feminism is to avoid responsibility and accountability and convince men to do things for women without expecting anything in return.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:34 AM
19

Anthropology/sociology are 'soft'/social sciences. The field (allegedly) tries to employ the scientific method in order to arrive at conclusions but we're all pretty well aware that most of the time, especially when there's a "minor in gender studies" attached, it's just flinging shit at the wall and seeing what will stick. That doesn't mean that ten years of effort working toward an advanced degree is anything to scoff at but looking at how that degree is employed is certainly worthy of critici…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:29 AM
2

What frightens me about that graph is that the low-end of the spectrum is comprised of educators and health professionals.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:43 PM
10

Badly written drivel? Oh, it's from Upworthy? Shocker
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:37 PM
6

Most left-wing social justice movements are about tearing down society/culture by stigmatizing the normal and normalizing the abnormal.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:12 AM
2

I'm not expert, and I'm definitely not a lawyer, but I'd bet a very strong case could be made against that particular practice under the HIPAA laws.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:55 AM
0

Good for them! It's a shame the sane sisters here in the US don't take the wheel in this country and put the crazies back in their straight jackets.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:59 AM
2

I got the reference. Now I feel really, really old.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 03:03 AM
7

Apologizing can be construed as admitting fault. That's what apology should be construed to be. There are two types of apologies. The first type is the sincere apology. You say you messed up and that you're sorry. The second type is the non-apology apology. You fake contrition and usually add some condescending nonsense like "I'm sorry you took it that way." Like most people, I prefer the sincere apology. The problem isn't that apologizing is admitting you fell short. The problem is that as a so…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:52 AM
14

There is no "most humiliating moment" for Jessica Valenti. She lacks the self-awareness and sense of decency necessary for one to feel shame.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:09 AM
1

These leftist social justice movements, especially feminism, do everything they can to stigmatize the normal and normalize the abnormal. It's all about tearing society down so they can replace it their crazy dream utopia.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:34 AM
4

Well, yeah, that's what this sounds like, to be honest.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:58 AM
34

Seven months after the initial encounter, Jane visited a therapist, who said Jane’s had “an evolution” about how she felt about the initial encounter. Who the fuck are these therapists? This is as bad as that shit in the 80s with the "repressed memories" thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:50 AM
7

Marriage has been around in its current form for a few generations. The current form that ends in divorce more than half the time has been around for a few generations, probably starting somewhere in the 60s or 70s, but... For hundreds of thousands of years before that our ancestors did fine without marriage. ...is an absolute nonsense comment. Marriage has been an important part of society in most cultures going back to time immemorial. I'd like to see some source for this idea that "nearly all…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:45 AM
6

I find it funny how when you point to the political climate and refuse to marry because of it, many women will regard it as an issue of not trusting them. They should regard it as you not trusting them. Not trusting them is the wise decision. Marriage has numerous protections built in for women but no guarantees at all for men. Regardless of gender, if one is offered a contractual obligation where they will be punished and the other party rewarded if the contract is broken, even if the contract …
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:52 AM
5

What is common to feminists is thankfully rare among people in generally, but I like the cut of your jib.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/15 02:58 AM
8

I can agree with that, but I think with Ann Coulter the problem is that she's purposely controversial to sell books and get media appearances while Laurie Penny strikes me as being sincere. Feigned stupidity can be just as dangerous and annoying as the real thing but I think Ann Coulter could turn it off if she wanted and Laurie Penny is stuck being a well-meaning(?) chowder-head...which probably make Coulter a little worse, to be honest, because she should know better.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/15 11:48 PM
78

Laurie Penny is one of those rare people who has made a career of saying stupid things.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/15 12:25 PM
13

Nah, it's not his mind getting blown when they have both, but that shit ain't cheap so it don't happen often. :D
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/15 07:38 AM
4

Narcissism is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:26 AM
1

Your senators are just like any other politician. There is nothing they care about more than reelection. If enough people called and pushed for this they'd support it.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:53 AM
2

You could sue but that's almost certainly not going to win. I don't know about that. There's like half-a-dozen cases going on right now where some guy is suing his school under Title IX for gender discrimination for the way his sexual assault hearing was handled. I think a few might actually have been won/settled by now.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:29 AM
2

I don't know why. Republicans are generally very good on 2nd Amendment rights. Both parties get some things wrong, but if you feel "dirty" when people are doing the right thing the problem isn't the people doing the right thing, the problem is you.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:12 AM
1

That's why you would need to CALL YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES and encourage others to do the same.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:56 AM
11

The problem with some people posting shit like this is that they're looking for validation. They probably already know they're in the wrong, or just don't even want to consider the possibility. When they air their dirty laundry with that little twist of "now give me sympathy and tell me how I don't deserve this" and don't get the response they expect they rage quit. The woman posting this probably expected the sort of sympathy society usually gives women by default in any given situation, and co…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/15 01:46 AM
14

When this type of a response is made to women, it's called "victim blaming." I agree, to an extent, that this guy might have been setting himself up for trouble by not catching the initial warning signs, but when he told he didn't want her to come home with him that should have been the end of it. "No means no" goes both ways.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:57 AM
5

There's a little group on Reddit that likes to police wrongthink subs like this one with downvote brigades. I would think that a thread like this one would show up on their radar and set them to work, especially on a Friday night where they have nothing to do because there's nothing good on TV and they don't have a social life.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:41 AM
31

Also, sadly she probably will get her school job back after her year in prison. Not when she's registered as a sex offender, she won't. The "one year with time served" sentence is bullshit, but being on the sexual offenders registry is no joke.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 05:32 AM
8

That's probably a symptom of what I call the Phantom Downvote Phenomenon. There is a small but dedicated group that watches wrongthink subs like this one and downvotes content and comments within minutes of a posting. The numbers vary, but when that group is active it can dump anywhere from two to twenty downvotes. I've seen this in several subs, like KiA, TiA, subredditcancer, this sub, and others.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/15 10:03 PM
1

We should probably take his word for it. If anyone is intimately familiar with stupid, it's this guy.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:17 AM
16

It would be a waste of time and effort. She has nothing to take...except that mattress.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:49 PM
45

Women are so busy staring at the glass ceiling that they don't have time to be thankful for the glass floor.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/15 05:58 AM
0

Judging by vote totals, your racism was evident to everyone but yourself. Your obstinate refusal to acknowledge your own poor behavior is your failing, not mine. And for fuck's sake, at least try to think up something better than "retard boy." Your jibes and insults would make middle-schoolers cringe. You make it far too easy to mock you.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 08:51 AM
0

The only person you make a fool of with your posts is yourself. You're a slackwit buffoon with delusions of grandeur.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 08:37 AM
0

Not being a semi-literate buffoon from the ghetto Wow, more racism from Mr. "The inner bonobo unleashed, folks." You're right about one thing, you're not "semi-literate," but only because you'd have to develop your vocabulary and reading comprehension a bit to be considered that competent.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:34 AM
1

Free Speech is so that you can't be arrested for your speech. It's a restriction on the government, not anyone else (even Reddit). There is more to the concept of free speech than the restrictions placed on government by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The concept of free speech applies most strongly to those words, phrases, and ideas that we find objectionable, because the concept of free speech exists to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by its very nature, needs no protect…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:24 AM
1

...and then guess who the bad guy is in that situation!
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:13 AM
0

Who won't do anything about the problem, because they don't see it as a problem. The people doing this are their ideological brothers and sisters.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:12 AM
1

Which is still pathetic, but slightly less so because at least it's pathetic in an intelligent/efficient kind of way.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:10 AM
1

Why bother running, it's not like anyone's chasing you, fatty. :D (J/K, I'm a fatty, too. I sure as hell don't run, though, so good on you.)
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:03 AM
0

This isn't the only sub where the Phantom Down-Vote Phenomenon occurs. You can see it in a lot of "anti-SJW" subs, like Kia and TiA.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:08 AM
2

Does the judge think he's making that up? or that his mother brainwashed him into thinking that happened when it didn't? Both of those things are possible, and the judge has been on this case for over half-a-decade. This divorce has been going on over five years. I would normally think this sort of thing was some sort of crazy stunt, but given what little we do know, I'd say it's completely plausible the mother has done her level best to pollute the minds of her children against their father.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:29 AM
0

Yes, certain races have been compared to lesser primates, but that has nothing to do with my comparing violent female humans to a species in which most of the violence is committed by the female apes. No, of course it doesn't. It's just a coincidence you're parroting a stereotypically racist sentiment. /s As for the multiple syllables, wouldn't spellcheck simply give me equally short alternatives to the misspelled word? I think you've confused spell check with a thesaurus. I should probably expl…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:02 AM
0

Silence, knucklehead. Daddy is busy talking to one of the adults. Go and pray for a brain, or something. Oh my, however will I recover from such a burn? Given the middle school nature of the barbs, I think "I'm rubber, you're glue" shall suffice. It's been a pleasure watching you rage down to blubbering, juvenile nonsense. At least you can say you're entertaining.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:51 AM
4

If the press really wants her to do interviews and answer questions, they need to collectively stop covering her. Once she realizes she can't run a campaign without press coverage, she'll have start taking chances and stop trying to maintain total PR control.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:44 AM
0

I don't think I need to write a treatise on how certain races and ethnicities are/were often compared to lesser primates as a method of dehumanizing and insulting them since the history of such behavior is more or less common knowledge unless you were raised by wolves. As for your use of words with multiple syllables, spellcheck is obviously your friend, and even a blind squirrel finds a nut on occasion.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:40 AM
0

Ah, so now you're mocking someone's religion, how droll. I'd like to be surprised, but since it's apparent you're a xenophobe and a racist, religious intolerance is hardly startling. Sadly, all of those things generally correlate with low intelligence, which may explain why you think "yeah, I went there" is somehow clever. You should update your low-brow catch-phrases. That one's been out-of-fashion for at least a decade.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:33 AM
0

Eloquence is not relevant. For monosyllabic hooligans like yourself, it never is.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:24 AM
0

Don't be flattered. It's hard to ignore refuse and clutter. Your posts are the equivalent of driving by a trailer park.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:23 AM
0

shove it back up your ignorant ass. Yet another example of the eloquence typical of your posts. You should choose a new alias. "Pigman" is hardly fitting. Pigs are relatively intelligent.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:09 AM
1

Why do you assume there is a racial motive to the comment? I've seen enough of the sort of ignorant idiocy OP has posted in comments in this sub. What does "foreigner" status have to do with it? It's not a big leap from racist to xenophobe.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:39 AM
4

The inner bonobo unleashed, folks. Comparing brown-skinned foreigners to monkeys, regardless of their deplorable behavior, demonstrates a serious deficit of good sense and social graces. Your posts only serve to give legitimacy to critics of MRAs who cast us as a group of slovenly, backwards, socially awkward, uncouth, hateful heathens.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:22 AM
1

But aren't those the best kind?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:45 PM
2

And it only took us 10 years after the Pound Cake Speech to frame him! Well...Andrea Constand, the original accuser, made her official charges to Canadian authorities in 2005, about nine months after the speech. The press lit up as one might expect, which put an end to any campaign for personal responsibility in which Cosby might have been engaged. I don't think it's too far-fetched to believe that it took a few months of opposition research to dig up something on Cosby and make it worthwhile fo…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:20 AM
-3

Yes...and no. I grant that it's possible Bill Cosby may have done some or all of the things he's being accused of doing. I just find it funny that the accusations didn't start flying, at least not publicly, until after he started campaigning for person responsibility in the black community.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:03 AM
-7

I liked what Bill Cosby had to say about young black men today harming the image of all black people by trying to act like thugs. Yet you're not at all troubled that these accusations didn't start until after he started contradicting the prevailing narrative that all the black community's problems can be laid squarely at the feet of white people? The things Bill Cosby said that you agreed with were dangerous to the status quo. He needed to be taken down before what he was saying caught on and di…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:42 AM
3

I'm not sure why you'd think that given that many of the key reasons we're not currently in "sane times" are policies pushed from the left, where feminism and identity politics were born and make their home.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:18 AM
61

Not only is this an old (by at least a month or so) story, but the headline is seriously misleading. Nungesser isn't suing Sulkowicz, he's suing Columbia. The article is full of half-truths and the snide, shitty tone doesn't help. Not surprised to read "from Jezebel" at the bottom. It explains why that link is absolute garbage.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:51 AM
14

I don't want her dead, harmed, or even silenced, but I really wish people would stop promoting her idiocy without any sort of critical examination of the nonsense she peddles.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:02 PM
1

The problem with her 'accomplishments' is that they are all borne on the back of her family's wealth and connections. If any other show on HBO were performing as poorly as Girls is currrently it would be off HBO in a hot minute and praying for a Netflix revival. Kevin Smith's success with Clerks dwarfs Dunham's not only because he made much more money with much less, but also because he took a much greater risk and created a cultural touchstone for his generation. I can't even tell you what the …
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:51 PM
4

Here's a different way to look at it: Think of how the media portrays the men's rights movement and men's issues. Do they do a very good job of showing what you and others actually believe, or are they creating a caricature by showing the worst they can find and otherwise distorting information? Now stop and realize that these same people who are misrepresenting you and the men's rights movement are the same people who are reporting on climate issues. You know these people who have an obvious ag…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 06:46 AM
4

Bring it down a notch, Takei. ;-)
/r/MensRights14/06/15 12:51 PM
3

Whoa there, slugger, that's not how we roll in these parts.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 12:42 PM
10

I guess it's gotten so bad now that they're going to have to add White Guilt to the next edition of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, because that's some crazy shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 01:02 AM
2

The cameras weren't for the room, they were for her ego. I'm surprised they thought four cameras were enough.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:49 AM
8

Nungesser should sue the shit out of her. I think there's two reasons he hasn't, and won't, do so. One is that the public perception of a suit against her will be used by the usual suspects in the media to further the narrative that he's some sort of abusive misogynist rape machine. The other reason is that suing her wins him nothing but a moral victory, as she's an art major with no prospects who has nothing other than what mommy and daddy gives her...and after this porn video stunt, she may no…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:45 AM
2

If society agrees, through government, that the impoverished children of women who decided to have children outside of a stable relationship without appropriate financial resources must be cared for then society as a whole can bear that burden. The true abdication of responsibility occurs when society decides to foist that expense onto some poor sod who has no say in whether or not he becomes a father, and in some cases onto some poor sod who can prove he isn't the father.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:57 AM
18

I believe that was the subtle implication, but thanks for pointing it out for those who don't deal in subtlety.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:56 PM
3

I knew that before I even watched the video I did, too, but I felt obliged to continue for the, um, educational benefit, and to, uh, you know, keep an open, um, mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/15 07:33 AM
4

I think that would violate the 3rd Law of Poe-botics.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 12:25 AM
1

I hyperextended both my knees at the same time when I was in the Navy. Until that point, I had been very active, and consumed somewhere between 2k-3k calories a day without ballooning. After the injury, I couldn't be as active, but I continued to eat like I had before the injury. My weight, naturally, increased by a ridiculous amount, and it hindered the progress I was making with the knee injuries. I went from 175 lbs to almost 300 lbs in a few months. The doctor put me on a diet. When that hap…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 07:57 PM
28

Can confirm: am stork. My lazy cousin quit baby farming and took a cushy job delivering pickles.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 07:38 PM
3

Ashe Schow's columns are always good.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:53 AM
3

It's censorship of the most manipulative kind I can think of - it is relying on people's goodwill and desire to make you comfortable, using that to intimidate people and control what they can or can't do. Which sadly, only serves to kill that goodwill in others at a certain point. These sorts of things no longer work on me. I know it makes me a bit of a bastard, but sometimes I really enjoy making people uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:41 AM
1

I'm generally all for maintaining the moral high ground, but in cases like this I consider turnabout to be fair play. Emma Sulkowitz obviously has no problem with this sort of an attempt at public shaming and harassment. Let her feel the sting of her own lash.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:53 AM
1

These posters are no more stupid or irresponsibly reactionary than carrying a mattress around for months to garner pity and smear the reputation of another student. These posters are no more wrong or objectionable than Sulkowitz's own "art project."
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:51 AM
2

Seeing as how it's basically what Sulkowitz herself has been doing, I'm going to agree with you that it's poor form, but what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If they bring a knife, you bring a bat. If they bring a bat, you bring a gun. It's the Chicago way. If she can dish it out, she damn well better be able to take it.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:49 AM
7

I'm not sure how it can be turned into "ammo" when it's essentially the very same thing Sulkowitz's "art project" alleged to do: create a display that draws attention to a guilty party who is yet to be punished.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:46 AM
2

I'm not so sure about that. I think most people who view her with sympathy only do so because they've been fed a distorted account of events that is heavily biased in her favor. Many of those people, if presented with the entirety of the story, would turn on her in an instant. I think these posters are evidence of a new and growing trend of people objecting to this sort of social justice idiocy. As more people are exposed to what "social justice" really is, more people start to oppose it.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:00 AM
2

I would be more than happy to do it, and I'm sure I'm not alone. I've been shot at before, calling me names isn't going to rattle me. We need to stop being a bunch of pansies and start telling people like this to piss off.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:11 AM
23

She's a zealot. Giving her a slap on the wrist and letting her have another go isn't going to change her. She's either going to continue being a spectacle, which is likely since she seems to crave attention, or she's going to be exactly the same asshat she's been so far, only she's going to be more discreet about it. I'm tired of people in positions of public trust, especially police, being coddled because of bullshit reasons like "stress." Some things are honest errors that should be treated wi…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/15 03:26 AM
19

Then let her be a martyr. Let her be another Wu or Sarkeesian living off of internet panhandling. So long as the message is sent that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated by polite society and that there will be consequences for abusing one's position in this manner I don't care about her "martyrdom."
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/15 02:45 AM
1

It was a "what if" question, I don't feel the least bit bad about it. Congrats to them for their success.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:03 PM
1

So what do all these feminist/SJW spinmeisters do if the movie bombs after playing up this alleged boycott?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:12 AM
1

The preamble says "to promote the general welfare," not "to provide for the general welfare." There is an enormous difference between the two.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:40 PM
-1

No, the best solution is to do what almost every first world nation on the planet is doing. No, that's definitely not the best solution. In the places where public systems actually do work without a lot of problems, which is pretty much just the Scandinavian countries, you have homogeneous populations with shared cultural values. Not only is there strong consensus about what is and is not acceptable practice, there is a sense of civic responsibility that discourages misuse of the system. In othe…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:59 AM
1

I take no issue with taxes levied to provide for legitimate government functions, like defense, policing, and operating the judiciary and required bureaucratic functions. Charity is not a legitimate function of government, and the charity in question is really only done to allow those im power to use the coffers of government to buy votes from the poor. It gives politicians the carrot of "vote for me and we'll give you more" and the stick of "if you vote for the other guy they'll take your foods…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:57 PM
1

I take little issue with taxes levied to fund legitimate functions of government. Charity is not a legitimate function of the government.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:49 PM
0

You have as much say in government as you do in anything else. By that logic, I have as much control over government as I do over my gun-toting neighbor, which is, according to you, no control whatsoever. If it's wrong for someone to take what belongs to you by force, it doesn't magically become right because a third party does it for them, regardless of whether we pass a law allowing it or not.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:47 PM
0

What about welfare or healthcare systems take away people's individual rights? Welfare is essentially a state-run charity program. In order for it to work, donations have to be made to support it. Since the politicians responsible for the program don't want to take the chance that their charity program won't get enough donations, they make the donations mandatory. Mandatory donations aren't charity. They're a transfer of wealth. In order for that transfer to happen, someone with resources has to…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:18 AM
2

Because when people are allowed to say what they think, they sometimes say things that are true and/or popular that creates resistance to the policies those "liberals" support. That's why the left has to do Orwellian media tricks to advance much of their agenda. Think of how much worse the last elections would have been for the left if the "War on Women" scare tactics hadn't worked as well as they did. They used to use "republicans will take your social security/medicare," but seniors wised up t…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:04 AM
11

they arnt the elite... the elite are the ones who own the banks and big industry that financed and continue to finance the social movements thorough philanthropy. I'm going to disagree with you, even if no one else does. There are many facets to the elite. The affluent individuals you mention are certainly a part of the group, but it seems to me that the affluent are like the nobility and the academics are like the clergy in a feudal European society. The nobility/corporate leaders have the reso…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:08 AM
36

The "liberal elite," like this professor, aren't exactly liberals. They're leftist authoritarians and agitators, but they aren't liberal.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:54 AM
3

Sometimes I forget people like this exist, then I'm unpleasantly surprised by reminders like this story.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/15 10:32 AM
23

Hitler was an artist, too...
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:09 AM
6

"BUT THE WOMEN SUFFERED MORE!!!" -- Feminism
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:53 AM
8

I don't remember her as gross or ugly. She was, at worst, average-looking, and unlike a lot of female comedians did bits about stuff other than being a chick and vaginas. She was doing OK until Bush was elected, then she went off the rails and became incredibly bitter and hateful. She even went so far as to try her hand at talk radio. I don't know what she's done since, but it was sad watching her personality decay like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 03:02 PM
12

This represents my biggest problem with feminism and social justice. One of the SJWs gets caught and it's all "LOL, don't hold it against me or my movement," and of course they're given a pass and patted on the back because their "heart was in the right place." You know how I know 'Patriarchy' is bullshit, Sarah Silverman? Because if you were a man, there'd be consequences, but you're gonna be able to blow this off and say that anyone who brings this up in the future is being a (misogynistic) do…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 02:13 PM
5

She's not the queen. She's more of a minister or diplomat, making contact with savage hordes of potential rapists and internalized misogynists to spread the good word about the Fempire she serves.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 02:04 PM
49

Seems like a stand up guy to me. I see what you did there...
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 01:54 PM
27

Left-wing activism is how Janeane Garafalo killed her career. Looks like Silverman is following in her footsteps.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 01:52 PM
1

I wouldn't even drop that particular bomb on her. When I used to date, I'd go expecting to pay for the first date, but if the subject were broached and it was obvious she expected me to bear all the costs, there wouldn't be a second date.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:02 PM
5

But among all the lighthearted chatter about these love woes, another female colleague brought up an interesting point: are the ideals of feminism and the convention of a man paying for a first date incompatible? I say no. Emphatically no. Of course you do, because if you didn't you wouldn't be able to have your cake and eat it, too.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:58 PM
5

Next thing, he'll be going on about aborting retarded fetuses. I can completely understand why you would hate the idea of aborting retards, but since you're already out of the womb you don't have to be concerned. Then again, if they institute retroactive abortion and your mother decides to abort you in the 142nd trimester you might have a problem.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:47 PM
2

We need 50-50 in trash management, fire management, front line fighting as well as education / health - and one problem is an amplification of biological tendencies because the government funded jobs push a certain work environment. This is the first time I have ever seen anyone who labeled themselves a feminist express this idea. I really hope you're not trolling, because this would be an amazing step forward.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:40 PM
2

The problem isn't that no one is saying we shouldn't have a 50/50 distribution. No one is saying this thing or that thing should only be done by one gender or the other. What is happening is that people, like Bill Nye, are saying -- or at least implying -- that at least half the people in a given field should be women. On its face, that sounds fair and decent, but when you stop to give it any thought, you realize that if we put the idea into practice it would mean pushing some men out of the fie…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:36 PM
5

It is sad that even smart people like him joined this insanity party. I know the majority of people on Reddit loves the taste of this guy's dick, but all he really does is walk around saying things with which a majority of you agree. To his credit he did change his position on GMOs after reviewing the data available on the subject, but for the most part he just seems to me like another celebrity supporting left-wing causes, so this feminism nonsense doesn't surprise me in the least. Like /u/Clie…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:29 PM
1

I'm a middle-aged American man. Most of us are circumcised.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 01:14 PM
0

I love reddit, I really do, but the lack of support for feminism truly makes my blood boil. We're supposed to be a community of modernist thinking. Yeezus. Maybe everyone here who no longer sees the point of "feminism" and has tired of the excesses of that movement are the modern thinkers and you're the one that needs to update their thinking.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 01:11 PM
10

No, it's really not. You have a personal life and a professional life and, outside the niceties of holiday events and company picnics, they should remain as far apart as possible. The very idea is one of the major problems I have with "diversifying" the workplace. Women were supposed to join the workplace, fit into the existing dynamic, and rise and fall based on their own merits and decisions. Instead, women came into the workforce and everyone had to start walking on eggshells so they wouldn't…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 01:01 PM
2

Tina Fey writes well, but she annoys me...then again, so does Wand Sykes. I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a point. Carry on...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 09:18 AM
2

You know, I'm not her biggest fan, but she basically does the same goofy slapstick that every fat comedian/comedic actor before her has ever done. She's not original, but she is pretty good at it. She also performs consistently, even if it is just consistently "OK." Sarah Silverman, on the other hand, is horribly inconsistent. She can be ridiculously funny, but I don't think it happens often enough to justify her work. I much prefer Kathy Griffin, because she's pretty good, and she does work wit…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 09:17 AM
8

Yeah, that's why it gets the extra point. It's breaking a taboo, which is usually kinda kinky.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 09:07 AM
-1

http://alot2thinkabout.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/okaay.gif?w=640
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:42 AM
2

Well, I'll leave it up to others to decide, but since I'm not the one calling other people lying, ignorant children I think it's pretty obvious which of the two of us is the bigger douche-canoe.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:18 AM
2

Her general view is that the liberal part of America gets away with a lot of insane things. Are you saying they don't? I think Hillary Clinton is a very good example of the pass liberals generally get from the media. If she were a republican, they'd be "taking her down" right now. I think your complaint here has nothing to do with the quality of Show's work. I think your complaint is that you don't like who her articles target, which is an odd complaint considering that the people she "takes dow…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 12:04 AM
2

I think that the idea that there is "an axe to grind" is more an indication of your own bias than of Ashe Schow's bias. Furthermore, you can't call what she's doing yellow journalism because she's not writing news articles, she's writing opinion pieces. She's a columnist, not a journalist.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:51 PM
4

I don't see how the first two articles are "liberals are crazies." Nothing in the first one implies Harry Reid is crazy, it just recognizes that he admits he has no issue with dishonesty so long as he gets what he wants. The second simply acknowledges what many articles and opinion pieces acknowledged today, which is that Hillary Clinton's excuses about her behavior regarding official correspondence are lies, and the more information comes to light regarding the subject the more obvious that bec…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:11 AM
8

I'm going to disagree with you here because her articles are not "hey liberals are crazies." Her articles are "hey, feminists/social justice warriors are crazies." I'm a right-wing libertarian-ish nutjob, but even I realize that while feminists and SJWs may belong to the left, they're just a subset of the left. It's a subset that is worthy of criticism, and she's criticizing it, so good for her.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:56 AM
5

/r/TumblrInAction sometimes has some good HAES posts, along with other WTF SJW silliness.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:40 AM
5

just giving up and eating sticks of butter whenever you felt like it. TIL I'm already practicing HAES.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:38 AM
9

Let's be real. She's not the sole reason the problem exists, but I sincerely doubt she's doing anything to make it any better. Reddit is, if I am correctly informed, located in San Francisco, a place where this culture has made its nest. Nutty social justice propaganda there is the equivalent of belonging to a bowling league, softball team, or playing Magic the Gathering at hobby shops in the rest of America. Reddit's administrative team is probably lousy with those kinds of people, or at least …
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:09 PM
3

Pao (current reddit ceo) accused her former company of sexual harassment for not being able to climb up the latter. Perhaps she would have found it easier climbing up the former.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:04 PM
5

That's the great thing about being a CEO. You don't have to take time out of being a terrible human being to do the little things. You delegate things like that to your henchmen employees.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:46 PM
2

I used to read Fred's columns all the time. I was turned onto them by a guy named Joe Bageant, a fella I knew because he and I argued a lot on a local internet forum. I met Joe publicly for drinks a couple of times, and he was a good guy even though he and I didn't seem to agree about much. This was back just after the 2000 election, just a little before it became obligatory to want to stab someone with a different political view than your own right in the face with a rusty stiletto. I moved awa…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:45 AM
2

I keepp saying that what we need is marriage reform, not a flight from it. Until that reform happens, flight is the most logical response. The plethora of "where have all the men gone" articles bemoaning the fact that so many young men have checked out, opted for low-skill jobs that meet their basic personal needs so they can just mess around and do what they want, and avoid marriage show that this is already happening and at least a few people have noticed. Until the flight from marriage become…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:23 AM
1

http://thatsthejoke.net/thatsthejoke.jpg
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:30 PM
15

So big you could throw Nicolas Cage inside it and set it on fire.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:19 PM
6

I guess even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:09 AM
3

I'm going to disagree with you specifically because of your "Christian Movies" example. There are many great works of film that one could consider a 'Christian Movie' that are masterpieces. Charlton Heston as Moses in The Bible, Scorsese's The Last Temptation of Christ, or Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ are all excellent films. These are films with a nuanced narrative that convey messages even those who aren't Christians can embrace and appreciate. There are definitely quite a few 'Chris…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:47 AM
3

Basically it's poorly written and stupid. Which is, I believe, everyone's main objection to this kind of shtick. Wanna tell a story with a feminist message? Go for it, but make it good. This and those panels from Grrrl-Thor where she bonks Titania/Absorbing Man are just ham-handed, terribad, small-minded moralizing.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 01:35 AM
2

Sadly, the bulk of her sentence is for incorrectly storing her husband's severed remains. According to local ordnance, those have to be stored in the attic or cellar, and never in the closet. Roughly 60% of her sentence if for being in violation of that ordnance. /s
/r/MensRights28/03/15 05:12 AM
8

I wonder if any neo-nazis or nazi-wannabes with poor spelling skills ever end up there by accident?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:26 AM
1

You're not going to support anyone on $40-$50 a year in NYC. I can barely do it with a commute here in northern Virginia.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:49 AM
3

Because all people are supposed to be the same in the eyes of the law. If you need to be reminded of that maybe they need to revoke your captain's license.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/15 12:59 AM
1

If you started dating when she was a freshman and you were a senior, there are "Romeo and Juliet" laws to cover those kind of relationships in some places. We should probably have them in a lot of other places. That said, there's a big difference between you dating a girl in your age range even with you being an adult and her being a minor and a teacher in their 30s having sex with a teenage student over whom they have authority. This is a complicated issue with a lot of gray areas, but the line…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/15 12:57 AM
1

I thought everyone was aware the UN is a useless, do-nothing organization that only exists to say shitty things about the US and put nations like Sudan on human rights committees?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:27 AM
42

This is just like a certain internet tabloid that lectured everyone about the Jennifer Lawrence nude leaks being sued because they've still got Hulk Hogan's leaked sex tape on their site. It's wrong to do it to women, but do it to men all day long and no one cares.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:33 AM
2

Can't speak for the books, but my fiancee dragged me to see it at the theatre and it wasn't bad. It wasn't good, either, but they put enough polish on it that you could no longer tell it was a turd.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:47 AM
1

I couldn't decide whether to doubt it or not, but the part about how she flew to an Occupy protest in first class certainly punched all the right buttons on my confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:21 AM
4

Must be why I meet so many that are full of shit. :D (J/K, most of the women in my life are saints.)
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:02 AM
5

My fiancee read about this yesterday. Her mind was fucking blown. She couldn't understand how a woman could do that. I just reminded her that you can be an asshole even if you have a vagina.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:55 AM
6

I find Wil Wheaton and his SJW antics to be distasteful, but I have to give him credit for admitting something he linked to was in error.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:25 AM
2

That is the worst thing he has done in his career Sadly for him, aside from being a pathetic in-joke playing himself on a TV show and Stand By Me, it's pretty much all he's known for doing.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:24 AM
0

I dunno, but since they're right down the hall from your fifth grade classes, you could have checked if you were really curious.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:06 AM
2

Go away, now. How was middle-school today?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:24 AM
2

I don't like Russell Brand because he's a smug, shitty, do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do asshole. He pretty much call Jason Riley from the Wall Street Journal a house-n***** who was "for rent", as /u/MattClark0995 pointed out above, making him more of a racist than the majority of people he was criticizing for the events in Ferguson. He was recently campaigning for reduced rents in London for the poor, but oddly criticizing "the rich" for driving up rents. When a reporter asked if he wasn't as responsibl…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:11 AM
13

Aside from those here who find this sort of thing to be divisive, there is at least a small group of people on Reddit who concern-troll this and other subreddits (I first noticed this phenomenon in /r/TumblrInAction ) to downvote content with which they disagree (which in most cases is the entire sub). I am no longer surprised to see downvotes on reasonable submissions in this and other subs because whoever is doing this may have set up a bot or bots.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:39 AM
5

Not everyone on the far left is a smelly, unshowered, marxist revolutionary dumbass, dumbass.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:13 AM
6

This is a new variation of an old content generation device commonly used by the media. You're probably used to seeing it done by traditional media with polls. What happens is that the journalist/editor starts with a premise, looks for evidence to support that premise, and when they can't find it they commission a poll to create that evidence. These polls are a type of push poll, and aren't easy to spot. It is only when you dig into the metrics for the poll and evaluate what the questions were a…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:11 AM
2

Mother Jones: All the close-minded intolerance you've come to expect from certain sectors of the American left, but without the long-winded pretentiousness of The Atlantic!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:28 AM
2

I don't think you understand...if congress hasn't ratified a treaty we aren't bound by that treaty. That's something everyone should have learned in 10th Grade Civics.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:13 PM
3

The UN has no authority over anything. Unless our congress has ratified that treaty, it means nothing here.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:55 AM
4

One of the reasons people hate assholes is that they get to say "I told you so" on so,many occasions.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:46 AM
3

Words are powerful, but actions speak with more authority. What will define your group will not be its name, but what it does. The word "right" is already starting a ride on the euphemism treadmill, so leaving it behind might be for the best.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:17 AM
8

It's funny how when a woman does this stuff there isn't a lot of detail. If this were a story about a male judge stalking his ex, we'd get to hear about how he hid outside in the bushes like a creeper or was a frightening menace. I'd kind of like to know exactly what she did...for science.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/15 09:18 PM
2

Yet you make a post attempting to bait further response? That's not how people do "done."
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:30 AM
2

Sometimes I think half of everything, while ridiculous, is a small price to pay.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:23 AM
6

I fucking love Ashe Schow. Her columns are always great.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:40 AM
8

Really? Point to even one.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:11 PM
3

Then she needs to read her Bible more thoroughly. It's full of instances where God gets fed up with people's bullshit and turns the kharma on full blast.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:52 AM
1

Maybe we can get Sam Biddle to ask how much their new CMS is going to cost. He seems to be really interested in things like that.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:25 AM
2

I like myself and good writing too much to click on a link to The Atlantic.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:48 AM
7

Because they need to divert attention away from the floor falling out from under their manufactured rape "epidemic?"
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:22 AM
1

You do, obviously.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:21 AM
2

Ah, the old "it's not the nature of the evidence, it's seriousness of the charge" routine. That never gets old. /s
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:58 AM
1

“While the details of this one case may have been misreported, this does not erase the somber truth this article brought to light: Rape is far more prevalent than we realize, and it is often misunderstood and mishandled by peers, institutions and society at large,” Jesus Christ, this is just like Dan Rather and the "fake but accurate" George Bush military memos.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:05 AM
1

rape is the only crime where the victim has to prove non-consent The victim, or the prosecution as their representative, has to prove a crime has been committed in every crime. We do not simply accept the word of a victim of thievery or assault and hand down a conviction. The burden of proof is on the state and the accuser in every crime. That's the very basis of "innocent until proven guilty."
/r/MensRights29/11/14 06:49 PM
0

There has to be the reasonable assumption that consent was given. If that's the case, then jumping to an extreme and conjuring up a situation where some random stranger attacks another person on the street as an argument against what I said makes sense...but if I'm operating on the assumption that context matters, then your argument is little more than hyperbole and emotionalism. To withdraw consent you must object in a way that a reasonable person would understand, verbally or physically. It ca…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:24 PM
2

Only if you consider violence to be a part of an amorous advance, but since most of us aren't Klingon you're probably the only one, Commander Worf.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 01:32 AM
-1

However, If I am understanding your statement, you are stating that, absent other concerns, in order for it to be rape the 'victim' must have indicated verbally or physically that they do not consent. Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, and it shouldn't be at all surprising since that has been the accepted paradigm for a very long time.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:30 AM
6

Giving in to threats isn't consent, and since that's not been brought up until now I saw no point in addressing it. That doesn't change the nature of the situation Shia claims happened, and bringing it up in the context of the case we're discussing only serves to muddy the water.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:12 AM
5

This sounds like some "affirmative consent" nonsense. If one party makes amorous advances and the other party isn't impaired and doesn't object physically or verbally, it's not rape.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 05:32 AM
2

LOL! You must be acquainted with /r/TumblrInAction, but if you're not you'd fit right in.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:04 AM
2

If by "we" you mean the world in general, then you're correct. However, successful industrialized nations are experiencing a decline in birthrate. If a population bomb is really what worries you, bringing the industry, technology, and success of western culture to developing countries should be more of a priority, and a more realistic priority, than shooting people into space in hopes of colonizing other worlds. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to colonize other worlds, and space science is the bomb…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:45 AM
2

I'm incredibly flattered to have had the opportunity to oppress such a thoughtful and reasonable individual as yourself. Your response is truly the crowning achievement of my long and storied career as an oppressive shitlord.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:41 AM
1

So you're saying he deserved to be harassed and ridiculed because of what he was wearing? Man, look at this victim-blaming shitlord. Sounds like we need to organize a slut geek walk, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:58 AM
3

This sub is an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:57 AM
5

This sub is an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:57 AM
3

If you gave everyone on this planet at least an acre of their own, you could fit them all in the USA with room to spare and use Asia for farming. We have plenty of space. Unfortunately, what we also have are a lot of people who live in urban centers that are densely packed who believe the world is overcrowded because their location distorts their perspective. We aren't running out of space. We have space, people just prefer to cluster together like roaches for some reason. We also have plenty of…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:55 AM
5

Indeed, especially since a lot of astronauts are/were military and former military and the pay scale is the same for both genders. Even those who aren't military/former military are probably paid based on the GS scale which, once again, is the same for both genders.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:52 AM
2

"Labor" is the correct spelling, because 'Murica.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:50 AM
7

You could if anyone were creating caricatures, but this image post is directly related to something that just happened this week. Maybe you haven't heard about the "Shirtstorm?" We literally had a major space event this week, and the social media response from "straw-feminists" wasn't much different than what's portrayed in that image.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:46 AM
5

Let's not be too hasty. Sure this guy's a nutter, but he could be useful. Hey, /u/tocford, while you're here could you pick up /u/thepigmanagain and give him a lift to /r/TheRedPill when you go back home? He keeps getting lost and ending up here for some reason.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:43 AM
0

Your time, like the majority of the opinions you share in this sub, is of little value, and therefore difficult to "waste." Do us all a favor and shuffle off to Red Pill territory where you'll be welcome with open arms.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:01 AM
2

I love how these people keep trying to highlight the one incident that happened when was seven while glossing over what she did as an adolescent or trying to conflate what she did as an adolescent with what she did when she was seven.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:28 AM
9

Those of us who aren't know that you go to South Park Studios (http://southpark.cc.com/) instead of watching poor quality "look guys, I filmed my television with a mid-1980s video-tape camera" garbage on YouTube.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:32 AM
3

Let's not be hasty and rule out time travel. (/s)
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:57 AM
5

As a communications major drop-out, I'd like to be offended by this. Unfortunately, I can't because it's true.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:55 AM
4

I don't agree with "trigger warnings," and I probably don't agree with a lot of other things the person who wrote that article believes in, but they're a quality individual. It's so very rare to find someone who realizes that doing the right thing is important but doing the right thing the right way is just as important.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:08 PM
-1

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:32 AM
5

In this case the "fake geek girl" label is a legitimate criticism because it's aimed at women like Sarskeezian who are pretending to be something they're not.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:33 AM
6

After seeing this it reminded me that one of the longest running and most popular tv shows in the US reduced female statutory rape to a joke that those males are lucky. It doesn't sound like you actually watched that episode of South Park. It was pointing out that what you're complaining about is problem, not condoning it. That's why they even went to the extreme of making the student having the inappropriate relationship with the teacher a pre-school student to drive the point home.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:27 AM
3

Want to Prevent Sexual Violence? Accept That You Know a Rapist To tackle the problem, we must start by talking to middle school children That didn't just escalate quickly, that launched into orbit with undue haste.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:09 AM
0

...would you care to explain exactly what that's supposed to mean, or are you going to tell us that it's not your job to educate shitlords?
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:59 AM
15

Not from Reason, those folks are usually pretty fair and, dare I say, reasonable. It's one of the few really good publications/websites out there right now.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:13 AM
3

Welcome to "science" subreddits.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:31 AM
1

Aside from Salem there was also the American south during the civil rights eta, the pedophilia moral panic of the 1980s, the 'repressed memory' craze and multiple other examples, but since it appears your pea-brain is incapable of processing more than one event at a time, and there's obviously nothing reasonable anyone can say to dissuade you from behaving in the same manner as those feminist you clearly detest, I think we're done.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:20 AM
1

Such a large number of accusations has never yet led to a total pack of lies History is full of people being punished or murdered because of that kind of thinking only to be exonerated later, and you don't have to go all the way back to the Salem Witch Trials to see it. Though I suppose it's not surprising that a self-proclaimed logician with a penchant for ad hominem is willfully ignorant of that sort of thing when it's not convenient to his argument.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:32 AM
1

It is might as well be for you, since you've made it abundantly clear you don't understand how it works. Calling the thought process you're demonstrating here "logic" is like wrapping flank steak in bacon and trying to pass it off as filet mignon. Calling it filet mignon doesn't make it filet mignon. You've started with a conclusion and worked your way backwards. That's not logic.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:31 AM
1

It's not crap. "Virtually certain" isn't an excuse regardless of the hearsay upon which you're basing that "certainty." If you were thinking, and not chasing targets based on ideology, you wouldn't be blind to the danger of trotting out your opponents own tactics and trying to rationalize them when you believe they work to your advantage. Either we adhere to the standard that people who are accused are alleged to have done something and not guilty based on the quality or quantity of the accusati…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:38 AM
0

I remember a lot of people thinking it was "virtually certain" that the Duke lacrosse team raped a stripper. There's a reason we use the word "alleged," even when we're "virtually certain."
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:05 AM
1

Well, part of being skeptical is keeping your mind open to the possibility you're skeptical about...if that makes sense. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I agree with /u/Nomenimion that "allegedly" is a very important word, especially where sexual assault is involved, especially on this sub.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:25 PM
2

Well if there's one place where allegations aren't enough to tar and feather a person or group of person I would think this sub would be it. Or are we going to suddenly embrace "an accusation (or accusations) is proof enough" because in this one case it makes feminist look bad?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:56 PM
2

That can be done, but I don't think that's what happened here...on the other hand, at least it shows that she accepts failure and moves on to something else, but that just raises questions about why she can't accept her failures in the realm of relationships and do the same thing there she's done with her work life.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:23 AM
1

So glad to see that I wound you up so hard that you decided to troll my post history, weirdo. Get a life, and leave the Archer quotes to someone funny.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:55 PM
1

I wonder if Jerry Jones will get an indefinite suspension when a video surfaces, or if that treatment's just reserved for players.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:37 AM
0

Well, the old left isn't what we're dealing with these days. These are the most illiberal 'liberals' one can imagine, but I agree with you. The left, regardless of how you think of it, is literally clogged with these people.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:01 AM
3

This right here is why the MHRM needs to avoid at all costs becoming a right wing movement. That would be a lot easier to do if "the left" wasn't beholden to identity groups, especially feminists. As it is, there is an implied obligation that to be of "the left" one must adhere to those values which are opposed by the MHRM and others who believe in real equality and not "equality" as defined by those engaged in identity politics. You might want to be a man of "the left," but you'll be run out of…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:36 AM
0

That was fucking painful to read. If he'd spent as much time getting to the point as he spent trying (and mostly failing) to be clever I might have bothered finishing the whole thing. The comments on this post are really good, and some of the links you guys are posting are excellent, but the original article OP linked is terrible.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:29 AM
3

I don't know, man. That's an awful lot like telling a guy he doesn't know how to keep a woman happy after he finds out his wife is cheating. It's probably not her fault her husband decided to cheat...some people, male and female, just do stupid, hurtful shit. I don't blame her for feeling vengeful and spiteful, but what she's doing is still wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:47 PM
0

It's funny how some people can't see the bias in things like The Daily Show or Mr. Oliver's new program until that bias lines up against one of their pet causes. Pick a topic on which you agree with the Jon Stewarts and John Olivers. Research what your opposition actually says about that topic...not just the fringe nutters, but the average person. Then watch a segment on one of these shows dealing with that topic and try to see it through the eyes of the people with whom you disagree. This is no…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:25 AM
2

...another bill maher One of those is more than enough.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:18 AM
3

A real hero is a hero by mistake. They just want to go unnoticed like everyone else, but one of the worst things you can be is "like everyone else." One day something happens and they realize that what "everyone else" is, or is doing, is wrong. "Everyone else" can be a hooligan if they want, but someone has to stand apart and do the right thing. A real hero doesn't always do something grand. Sometimes it's the little things that count. One small wave is a powerful thing when it heralds a change …
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:59 AM
8

Plea bargains aren't offered after a conviction. Prosecutors only use them to avoid wasting time on trials.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:28 AM
6

It saddens me to say this, but "admitting men, too" isn't going to happen. The "feminists" and "women's advocates" running the show would rather seen them shut down than see men served. It's not just because they have a problem with men (they do). Feminism grows the same way a cult does. You find people who are vulnerable, whether they're young college students who take a course or two in Women's Studies before getting sucked into the useless degree program or those who are in a desperate situat…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:59 AM
1

An argument that only serves to demonstrate further that your comparison of the two makes very little sense.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:36 AM
1

Sucks, but an 18 year old can legally consent to all kinds of things Maybe an 18 year old can, but a 14 year old can't, and the 18 year old in question was not the boy's parent or legal guardian.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:10 PM
0

Even if the young woman turns out to be a victim of abuse, there are varying degrees of guilt. She still left a helpless baby out in the elements by the side of the road. You just don't do that. There is absolutely no justification for that kind of action. It's a step away from Prom Night Dumpster Baby.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:14 PM
3

When altar boys start leaving helpless infants out in the elements that will become a valid comparison. Until then the only person they harm with their silence is themself, which is their choice. I'd prefer no one suffer in silence, but what makes this case wrong is that the young woman's choices put a helpless infant in danger. Choosing your own suffering is one thing. Putting a baby in danger is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:49 PM
9

So the real victim here is the person that left an infant on the side of the road, and not either the infant or the guy she's trying to throw under the bus? She didn't have to go through this alone. There are resources available for expectant mothers, especially teens. If she was being abused, which I grant is possible despite knowing that you're only bringing it up as another avenue to absolve this young woman of the guilt that should rightfully comes with her actions, she could have reported t…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:35 AM
7

I don't think your sarcasm translated very well here, but I get what you were saying.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:26 AM
36

So you're saying you just linked me to a Gawker article instead of posting a screen cap? Jerk.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:51 AM
1

I stand by what I said for one very important reason: Tucker Carlson isn't bright enough to have stumbled upon the idiocy he's espousing on his own. He was imprinted with those ideas, much like many of the rest of us were before we critically examined and rejected them, from the time he was a toddler. It may have been a knee-jerk stupid thing to say, but it accurately reflects the outdated status quo boobs like Carlson attempt to prop up with their mindless prattle. It's an unknowing admission o…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:42 AM
6

his response is "all standards are double standards". How stupid do you have to be to say something like that? The problem isn't so much that Tucker Carlson is an idiot (though to be honest, even as someone that is more on the right than the left, I find Tucker Carlson to be a complete boob) as it is that in this particular case he's proved his worth as an idiot savant with an observation that is astoundingly simple and true. If you think about it, one of the reasons this sub exists is that the …
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:22 AM
2

Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation are all tools of The Patriarchy™, Shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:24 PM
0

On display is rhetoric steeped in rape culture, gender-blindness and even age-old stereotypes of feminists as angry, hairy-legged, bra-burning, man-hating lesbians who believe that men are the root of everything bad — or, as we've come to call it, patriarchy. If it's "just a stereotype" that feminists (or at least "man-hating lesbians") believe men are the root of everything bad, why do you have a word for the belief that men are the root of everything bad? The lady White Knight doth protest too…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:46 AM
8

If more of us started vocally rejecting false choices like the either/or of "pro-life"/"pro-choice" and made clear that we are aware that there are varying degrees of right-and-wrong in between whatever two extremes we're being offered, there would eventually be more viewpoints reflected in the media than just the two most extreme available in a given situation. These false dichotomies are offered as a way of balkanizing the population and empowering certain accepted radical views.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:23 AM
17

While you're busy telling these women what they should believe, maybe you could take a step back and consider that maybe they don't believe those things just to take a stance that is the polar opposite of a movement they reject. Maybe they think that abortion is wrong, that forcing one person to pay for another person's birth control is wrong, and that there are standards of behavior to which people should adhere lest they give the impression that they're undignified and trashy regardless of wha…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 11:42 PM
1

I don't see how a 35ft buffer zone curtails the rights of anyone to say anything If you have to get permission to speak, it's no longer a right, it's a privilege, and one that can be easily revoked. The government has no business telling people where they can speak on public property. If a private individual or business wants to keep people off their property, that's their right. So long as these protesters are not accosting anyone going to or from these locations they aren't breaking any laws. …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:24 AM
1

you're obviously very emotional about this issue Heaven forbid anyone have a strong opinion on a subject. "You're being emotional" is only slightly less derailing than "you're racists/sexist," and is a thinly-veiled ad hominen. You're right that abortion activists have killed people, but he's right that the actions of bad actors in any given group aren't a legitimate reason to curtail the rights of everyone else.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:47 AM
7

Congratulations, you found at least one alternative I find even more objectionable than Hillary. Ugh...do not want.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:19 PM
2

Of course not, but "left wing" doesn't always mean "democrat." However, do you really think the democrats are going to be interesting in helping advance our agenda when one of that party's core constituency groups happens to be feminists? Is it really surprising with that in mind that leftist/democrat operatives/media outlets are going to bash the men's movement?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:46 AM
12

Funny how the "most important job in the world" is still the one that most men don't want. No, what's really funny is that people still fall for this pandering "most important job in the world" nonsense. Parenting is important, but try to keep some perspective. Raising a child is not some kind of fancy rocket-surgery. Mothers, unlike fathers, also have to deal with their commitment to their kids being questioned any time they do work. I would have thought she'd be old enough to be familiar with …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:55 AM
8

You need to cross-post this to /r/TumblrInAction -- they would love this.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:46 AM
10

There will be the bad ones that try to abuse it but they'll be gone within a month... ...and in the course of the month before they move on to something better, what if they assault you or one of your family members? It's always "the bad ones" that ruin it for "the good ones," I know, but if it's a choice between the safety of myself and my loved ones and letting people use the street I live on as a campground the campground loses 10 times out of 10. Nobody wants these people to suffer, but nobo…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:43 PM
4

Ah, so this little run of pictures is hyperbole? Why am I not surprised?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:27 PM
8

Isn't Sandler's character in that film a messed up loser? If anything, I think the film portrays the possible undesirable effects such a relationship could have on a young man's fragile psyche.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:12 AM
13

As much as I hate to be That Guy, how many of you would be willing to let some stranger come camp out in your yard? Be honest...if you came out of your house/apartment one morning and there was someone sleeping on your front steps you'd be at least a little disturbed by it. I think some of the spikes in those pictures are way over the top, too, and that "pay to sit" bench is beyond ridiculous, but I can understand why property/business owners would want to discourage people from sleeping on thei…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:03 AM
1

Good point, but what I probably should have said "alleged sexual offender," even if that pretty much means "men" in this case.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:54 AM
4

I would disagree, if for no other reason than there don't seem to be any women dragged before these pseudo-puritanical tribunals wherein the women's studies crowd is over-represented. When it's happening exclusively to men, it's definitely a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:30 AM
7

They're also mostly subjective subjects. Not knocking them, as I was in that type of degree program, but there is a world of difference between "2+2=4"and "what do you think the author was trying to say?"
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:25 AM
12

Considering that the judge granted an injunction on the strength of the guy's case/complaint, I'd have to say it's at least a small victory. Duke is, unfortunately, not in a position to read the writing on the wall and back down gracefully. There's a lot of pressure on Duke and other schools to show they're being tough on sex offenders...which means they're going to railroad a lot of scapegoats to show they're doing what's expected of them.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:12 AM
1

Is prostitution legal in Oz?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:18 AM
1

Is this somewhere that prostitution isn't already illegal, because I'm under the impression that we arrest whoremongers here in the US (whether we should or not is a topic for debate).
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:27 AM
3

A Cook County trial court had previously ruled in favor of Dunston but Szafranski appealed, and the higher court sent the case back with a new framework: The dispute should be decided based on contracts and agreements between the two parties rather than just who has more compelling interest in the fate of the embryos. Yet to hear it told by this source, the judge basically decided the issue again on who has the more compelling interest with the contractual obligations barely being an afterthough…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:07 AM
4

I really hate to agree with either of you, so I won't. I would hope a person would be more concerned with reclaiming their relationship with their offspring than they would be about their dented, high-mileage Corolla. It's certainly not "Stockholm Syndrome," since the adoptive parents were doing nothing nefarious, and they're the only parents the child has ever known. There certainly has to be some sort of reasonable accord that can be struck in this situation. Too bad it appears everyone is bei…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:29 AM
4

The AG is refusing to investigate the administration and its appointees in the midst of a scandal? Color me shocked and surprised. This isn't a Men's Rights issue, it's a political corruption that's being overlooked because the majority of the media supports the corrupt assholes in power issue.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:07 AM
4

Last week Louie is "creepy" for taking no for an answer and trying again with the next woman he comes across. This week Vanessa is a "totally charming," "persistent," "good-humored," vibrant, self-actualized woman for not taking "no" for an answer. How many times have I seen "no means no" and "she doesn't have to explain why she's not interested" just today on Reddit? Looks like a little bit of the ol' double-standard to me. Seems to me that the author of this piece just wanted to talk shit abou…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:09 AM
3

At least he admits it's a double-standard...somehow that seems like a degree of progress.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:25 AM
2

Isn't it funny how the two guys bought into that so easily but the two women were incredulous?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:12 PM
1

That's probably because most of the boomers never really grew up. They weren't like the generation before them that had to live through a depression and a world war. I think every generation since "The Greatest Generation" has only had to deal with First World Problems and haven't developed the same type of character. We're a society of Peter Pans.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:55 AM
2

I'm pretty sure that the majority of the people involved with ST:TNG (with the exception of the guy that played Lt. Barclay, boy did he have an interesting history -- lost a role on St. Elsewhere to Howie Mandel because he was a Reagan supporter) weren't exactly republicans, and given that they were a bunch of futurist it's doubly unlikely that they were all misty-eyed about white-picket fences. You can trace the children are special, loving, eyes-full-of-wonder snowflakes thing back a lot farth…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:30 PM
4

Chivalry is dead because feminism killed it. Whenever its zombified corpse rears its head you can hear the screams of "neckbeard" and "fedora" as Jezebel readers do their best to beat it back into its grave.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:45 AM
5

We're journalists and don't know any better I dated a reporter back in the 90s. What's sad is that it's not so much that they don't know any better as that they don't know much of anything at all except for writing. Journalism is, with some exceptions, not very specialized, especially at the local level. The reporter I dated wasn't stupid. She was rather bright, to be honest, but having no specialized knowledge of what she was covering in many cases tended to combine with her inherent bias on a …
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:47 PM
3

militant MRA who believes women should be sex slaves and nothing more. At the risk of sounding a wee bit NAFALT, I think you're confusing MRAs and Red Pillers, Shitlord.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:38 AM
0

The guy boned his girlfriend's daughter, then ran off with her. Not only is cheating pretty terrible, but the added salt in the wound of cheating with your significant other's daughter? Pretty fucking terrible is a good way to describe it, regardless of what value you might see in his work.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:51 AM
1

Woody Allen might not be a child molester, but he's still a pretty terrible human being. That said, even terrible human beings shouldn't be falsely accused.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:46 AM
3

I think it is absolutely amazing that a woman is admitting that men have at least one very good reason to be wary of the whims of women.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:13 PM
16

Can you give me some sources backing this up? An across the board statement like that seems like it would require some larger form of evidence or study to prove. Why would I need a source for a simple question of probability? When a man and a woman are in a sexual relationship together, the possibility of such a thing exists. If something could happen, it represents a risk. I don't think we need to construct actuarial tables to define the probabilities such an event could occur to accept that th…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:47 PM
20

Every man is at a risk, however slight, of his significant other "entrapping" him. There's nothing misogynistic about acknowledging reality. I'm not sure what is so disturbing about encouraging men to exercise their choice over their body to control their reproductive outcomes, or why you would expect that they should be obligated to divulge their personal medical information to anyone else. That is certainly not the standard our culture/society has imposed regarding women exercising their choic…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:27 PM
37

/u/AlphaFlight deleted their comment, but it said: You can tell a real human rights movement by the rampant misogyny. Way to go fellas. Some unscrupulous individual is purposely encouraging others to deceive people with whom they are in a relationship in a deeply disturbing fashion and the great evil /u/AlphaFlight saw here is that someone said "bitches be crazy." I know this is the internet, and there is no hashtag or font for sarcasm and humor, and I'm only guessing /u/profeyn is joking. I per…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:40 PM
2

I'm not sure how an analysis from a website that is basically Jezebel for Menz!!! is supposed to do anything other than reinforce my opinion that this is just thinly-veiled chick-bashing completely unfit for this subreddit. Take this shit over to /r/TheRedPill where it belongs.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:34 AM
4

Really, it's like a Jezebel site written for people who frequent /r/TheRedPill
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:11 AM
4

Not a religion so much as a cult: The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law. Feminism doesn't have a leader, but "zealous and unquestioning commitment" to ideology does seem like a prerequisite. Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. Look at the public shaming tactics employed when anyone questions the feminist dogma. If wome…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 07:24 AM
1

She's right about a few things. She was betrayed by the person in whom she confided, and her pastor should have talked to her before passing along hearsay to her husband. If the pastor had been wrong, that could have caused a lot of issues. Not being up front about wanting a divorce is definitely underhanded, but other than that, I'm not sure anything about this woman's story warrants a link on /r/MensRights -- let's try to keep it classy, gents.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:29 AM
5

If this were the case, I'd be hearing "I don't get along well with other men" as often as I hear "I don't get along well with other women." I can't think of the last time I heard another man say such as thing. Sadly, I can recall multiple instances of women using the line, including my own girlfriend. If there is a particular gender that is having trouble with same gender friendships, it's women, not men.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 06:43 AM
3

Also, don't dish it if you can't take it. 1: Considering you're the twat that decided to start the train of insults, you might want to take your own advice. 2: I'm not the one complaining about "tone," so if there's someone here who "can't take it," it would be you. Enjoy your butthurt, but unless you're here to do something other than proselytize it would be great if you could please enjoy it somewhere else.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:24 PM
3

I see. My twenty-five years of experience is worthless anecdote. I can't see any reason why this would be surprising to you unless you don't know what I'm referring to when I say "anecdotal." If you cared at all about these men's rights you talk about I'd expect you'd make at least a half-assed attempt to persuade. That's pretty ironic commentary coming from someone who suggests that, because I disagree with them, I want "harem tents," "witch burnings," "foot binding," "women having to cover the…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 07:56 PM
3

TL;DR: My anecdotal experience trumps the deluge of craziness for which the movement I identify with is responsible, and if you don't agree it's because you're a misogynist that wants to abuse and rape women. /yawn -- This would barely be an interesting response even if it wasn't the same recycled tripe we're often treated to when some "feminist" decides to come "enlighten" us.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:54 PM
7

I would hope feminism would be a dynamic and adapatable movement. I would hope people in hell would get ice water, and we'd both be shit out of luck. But to frame men's rights in opposition to feminism is counterproductive. When 'feminism' in any of its various forms or any other agency, organization, or movement is working against your interests, you'd be daft not to work in opposition to it. Feminism is no longer about equality, if it ever was. It now seeks special treatment for one gender at …
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:10 PM
2

And it's not much different than "why didn't you help that damsel in distress? That's what a real man would do." This sort of thinking relies on manipulating people by making them feel as if they're not adhering to accepted stereotypes.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:03 PM
3

privilege isn't about guilt Yes, it is. That's why you're apt to receive a "check your privilege" should you have the temerity to legitimately question the ideas, motives, speech, and/or actions of the feminist movement. "Check your privilege" is basically saying, "You need to shut up, since you should feel bad because you have it so good at our expense." The concept of "privilege" isn't about much other than silencing and marginalizing people by making them feel or appear guilty.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:00 PM
5

This is about as close to making an 'original sin' argument as one can get without quoting Genesis.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:30 PM
4

More importantly, one of the most effective ways to deal with a political adversary is to force them to live under their own rules. Feminists and Social Justice Warriors insisted on speech codes...now they get to see what living under those codes is like. I can't think of a more effective way to encourage everyone to give up on these censorship drives than by engaging in them long enough to make everyone hate them.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:59 PM
6

Not with that attitude, they don't.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:25 AM
3

I would hope, but after 28 years? It seems more than a little unlikely.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:05 AM
7

The man is a professional flame-baiting attention whore. If anything, he's going to be drawn to it like bugs to porch light.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:00 AM
8

There is a whole boatload of WTF going on here, whatever may or may not have happened. Coming after the guy 28 years after the fact for something they might have done when they were 12? The important part of the story is missing: what kind of evidence is there to justify an arrest and trial?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:37 AM
21

I think he's just spouting nonsense to get back in certain good graces he lost after the Atheism+ Elevatorgate nonsense. It's OK to be all edgy and piss on people of faith, but you don't do that shit with women, especially when they're rabid feminists.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 07:42 AM
2

I don't think we should be surprised that an offshoot of the socialist movement deals in terms of systems and groups instead of individuals.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:53 AM
3

I don't mock other people's bullshit because I wouldn't want them to mock my own. Regardless of your race, religion, or region, there are few people who don't buy into...and broadcast...some kind of bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:34 AM
8

Women having unreasonable expectations while complaining about men also having unreasonable expectations is a hypocrisy, but nothing in this video really addresses the problem. I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't like the way some of these ideas were phrased, and in some cases the ideas articulated were objectionable. This is hardly a video I would post to represent my point-of-view.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:36 AM
2

Facts are incapable of being malicious or false. Facts can be extremely malicious depending on how they're used. Saying they can't be false is redundantly stating the obvious.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:43 AM
1

Well, yes, in that neither are slanderous. Actually, they're both incredibly slanderous in that they imply something about either gender as a whole that is only true for an incredible small percentage. To be fair to both you and OP, it would be incredibly difficult to write an article where it's obvious that the author is speaking about a particular group of people, for instance if an author is writing about in low-income minority neighborhoods, without the implication that said group of people …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:55 AM
7

I really don't need to note the quotes, I'm the one that put them there, for exactly that reasons, LOL.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:10 AM
4

I'm not sure how "demonstrable" it is that "street harassment" is performed mostly by men, and even if it were "demonstrable," it's no less slanderous than the "demonstrable fact" that most acts of prostitution are performed by women (see how that sort of stereotyping works?). The fact that the article doesn't say what you seem to think OP is complaining about is irrelevant when you realize that the first three words in his post are "From the comments..." He's not complaining about the article, …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:31 AM
2

Dude, it might have been Kitty Genovese. So what if it was? What's my incentive for putting myself in harms way when it's "a number of people who were each physically stronger" than me? The answer for you, obviously, is because she's a weak, defenseless woman (very sexist of you to think like that, you know) and I'm a big (OK, fat) "privileged" male. Ride your horse o'er the hills to more troubled pastures, White Knight, the rest of us have to live in the real world.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:55 AM
3

Someone needs to upgrade their cable package so they can get ESPN4 and enjoy watching the Oppression Olympics. "Equality" hasn't been anything BUT a contest for at least a decade.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:48 AM
3

Men (an unspecific, general 'men') are framed as the oppressors and females as the victims. Men (all men) are labeled as hateful beasts who beset women with their vileness. Because the vast, vast, vast majority of street harassment is performed by men, and everyone knows it. That's not the writer of the article's fault. It occurs to me that your proving the point you're attempting to rebut.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:43 AM
5

I work in a data center, which is a tech job, and there are lots of days when I come where I move heavy 2U and 3U servers. Every so often we have to expand our capacity, which means bringing in new cabinets, crawling around under the drop-floor running cables, and any number of other physically demanding tasks. The last woman we had working here was brilliant (which is why she didn't stay long--already had her CCNA and was just here to get enough experience in to get a much better job). If every…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:12 AM
4

I'm holding out hope that the OP of that thread...and maybe a few others like them...might see the reactionary vitriol and stop to consider that maybe "feminism" or the "left wing" or whatever isn't attracting these people because it refuses to acknowledge their problems. I've never gotten an answer from a feminist who has claimed that "feminism can fix men's problems" when I've asked how feminism is going to do that when groups like NOW are getting the governor of FL to veto the no-more-alimony…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:17 AM
5

Even funnier when you consider that one of them says that there could never be a "white supremacists left-wing movement." I don't want to Godwin the conversation, but I can think of at least one...
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:12 AM
2

While I don't disagree (and I'm a republican that lives in VA), Amanda Marcotte is a thousand times worse. The only difference between the two is that one of the idiots holds a public office and has an impact on policy.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:29 AM
1

I never get paid in gum. :-(
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:13 AM
1

I don't know if this ruling would preclude that but I'm sure the state bears some liability as well.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:24 AM
1

I don't disagree, but some recompense and his freedom is still better than just being released from jail.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:22 AM
5

To be fair, the punishment is "light" only because the judge rightfully wants Montgomery paid restitution, and if Coast is sitting in a jail cell she's not going to be able to pay it. Montgomery should be going after the state for restitution as well, especially since this case never should have gone to trial nor should a guilty verdict have been handed down.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:27 AM
3

A dialogue where only one of multiple parties speaks isn't a dialogue, it's a monologue. Anyone who says anything even remotely similar to this doesn't want a discourse, they want to dictate.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:42 AM
1

The real bottom line is that we need to move the ball forward on this issue. As someone else said, there are plenty of other examples we could use. This example could possibly blow up in our faces and set us back.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:39 PM
1

Also doesnt it occur to you to ask what his sex offence was anyway? With feminists inspired legislation that may not even mean anything. This highlights my point. Do you think people hearing this story through the prism of a feminist-friendly media are going to ask that kind of a probing question? They're going to hear "sex offender" and automatically think rapist or child molester.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:33 PM
1

We must focus on both, because you can be damn sure our opponents do.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:47 PM
2

Well, since a few of you can't puzzle this out because your blood is up, let me paint you a picture: Somehow, a legitimate push is made to deal with false accusations. Laws making the offense carry a stiffer sentence are suggested, prosecutors start going after offenders, things of that nature. The ball is rolling. Enter the usual suspects: Gloria Allred makes a one of her usual public spectacles and does the talk show circuit to bring attention to a woman she's defending against a false accusat…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:02 PM
5

The "why not" is a matter of optics, not ethics. It would be entirely too easy for feminists, who already receive favorable treatment at most major/national media outlets, to paint this woman as the face of false accusers. On top of their "false accusations rarely happen" mantra, they're just going to add in, "but when they do it's because the women is distressed." If we seriously want the issue of false accusation to be treated seriously, we're going to have to find better cases than this one t…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:22 AM
5

While it's good to see this happening, I'm also concerned about the picture it's going to paint down the road. Reading the story, it looks like this woman has some serious problems. So serious, in fact, that her mental health case worker suggested she have a teddy bear. I don't think this is the "test case" we really want to go national, gents.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:32 AM
6

It is not misandric to suggest that men stop inserting their opinions into every discussion. It's not a discussion when only one of two or more opposing/dissenting parties speak, it's a monologue. You, and those like you, don't want a discussion, you want to lecture and dictate.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:31 AM
15

You reap what you sow regardless of your gender. It's pretty obvious from the gif that the guy wasn't going in for a grope or anything. Everyone on the bus got tossed around during that turn/stop. If she thought it was appropriate to slap him because he couldn't stop his forward momentum into her, she should have appreciated the slap she got for her failure to control her momentum into him.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:35 AM
0

I would assume that "dhoushi" is pronounced the same way as "douchey" and is either a troll account or someone who is very aware of their own shortcomings.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:12 AM
2

Margaret Thatcher isn't a woman, she's a man. --(feminist and anti-nuclear activist) Helen Caldicott
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:03 AM
3

Well, I might shove it in places it doesn't belong, but I'm pretty sure none of those places is going to be another person that doesn't want the bother.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:22 AM
1

This is a problem only because men who need assistance aren't receiving it. If men were being helped the way they should be, I'd still expect expenditures for women's health to be larger, because even discounting reproductive issues women (in general) aren't as durable as men and are more easily/seriously injured than men.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 04:00 AM
50

I wouldn't say it "scares" men off, I'd say it annoys them to the point where there's no longer any point in spending any time with such a woman. If every interaction is an argument or unreasonable demand, I'm not going to stick around, either, and it doesn't matter if the root cause of the bullshit is feminism or religious beliefs or something else.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:36 PM
0

An employer can do anything they want, within reason, that doesn't mean it's right, even if it is legal. If you feel like hiring someone to protect your interests in a situation like this is a waste of money that's your business but your feelings on the subject doesn't determine the validity of the response.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 06:06 PM
0

Calling or appearing for a client isn't a consult, and as OP's situation makes clear, just because "everything you've done is what you're supposed to do" or you haven't done anything wrong in the first place doesn't mean you're not in for someone tossing a shit-fit. The point of retaining an attorney in this kind of situation is that there will be a record of anything that goes on from an officer of the court, someone who is there on your side will be fully aware of the laws regarding your right…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:16 PM
0

It's never a "waste" of someone's time when they're being paid. I'd advise seeking legal counsel just because so many people don't when they should have. Sometimes merely having a practicing attorney call or appear for these shenanigans makes them disappear just because your employer realizes what a shit-fit they're in for if they push their luck. Making sure you don't sue the company is just as important as making sure some anonymous butthurt colleague doesn't sue.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:49 PM
13

Link to the article to which he is referring: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2329180/The-real-reason-women-like-leave-late-babies-Selfish-men.html
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:37 AM
0

Link to the article in question, since Peter Lloyd and everyone else seems to have forgotten to give us a reference: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2329180/The-real-reason-women-like-leave-late-babies-Selfish-men.html
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:27 AM
2

You can always tell when SRS slinks out from under its rock. Once they're out of their echo chamber and the downvotes start, they delete all their posts and you get a giant chain of: deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted It almost reaffirms my faith in humanity...but only "almost."
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:30 AM
0

Your attempted rewording makes it seem as if you believe the article should have been written in middle schooler's English. Waaaaay back when I took any number of writing courses in college, every course/chapter/section dealing with journalism actually suggested that your articles be written with expectation that your audience/the reader was not a strong reader and that they had no knowledge of the topic(s) discussed in your article. This basically boiled down "write it as if it's to be read by …
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:55 AM
2

I'm old enough to remember when "academics" were learned people with a bit of wisdom, not a bunch of nutters with fancy degrees who backed radical idiocy because they'd lost touch with reality while living in their ivory towers.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 05:04 AM
2

Does a tween/teen have the same depth of understanding as an adult? Probably not, but my son is an 7th Grader, and while he may not be able to articulate the difference between right and wrong with the same clarity as an adult, that doesn't mean he doesn't understand that difference. Are you suggesting that at children between the ages of 10-18 really don't understand that lying is wrong? That they don't understand that rape is viewed as something absolutely terrible? They may fail to take into …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:34 PM
5

It's not "vengeance," it's catharsis. I remember reading some judge saying that rehabilitation is a relatively new idea in justice/law, and that one of the compelling reasons to punish criminals by incarcerating them, aside from removing them from the populace they threaten, is to assure the other members of society that evil/wrong-doing is punished. There are few things quite so evil/wrong as accusing someone of a crime so heinous that we hide the identity of the victim to protect their reputat…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:47 AM
2

If we really want to make a change here, we need to find another republican that will run against this guy in his next primary/election and fund the living hell out of him. Then hopefully the bill will pass and the new candidate will sign it.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:36 AM
9

He'll be lucky if he can win another gubernatorial election, he can forget about the presidency.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:34 AM
5

This one is kind of a moral quandary, but since we're not the Fempire, we're going to have to admit that there are some gray areas. I think the guy has a right to know, but I can see the hazards of him using the kid as leverage to worm his way into your sister's life and cause problems...and using children as leverage for blackmail/extortion/general douche-baggery is something we regularly fault women for doing in this sub. This is one of those rare times where, given what you're saying is absol…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:07 PM
2

That there "male stereotypes" that encourage violence outside of socially accepted circumstances is a myth, and phrasing it like that is not only paying lip-service to feminist propaganda, but legitimizing it as well.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:57 PM
4

True, but posting here doesn't mean we're going to wrap them in our fluffly cuddle blanket and tell them they're wonderful. /u/GamerLioness isn't complaining that she can't post here, she's complaining about the response she's receiving.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:58 AM
1

I think someone was being facetious.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:56 AM
12

I think the outrage here stems more from what /u/Clauderoughly described as feminists "latch[ing] onto a successful community and then try[ing] and bend it to their social rules." I think there's a lot of hypocrisy involved with demanding "safe space(s)" for women while actively violating male dominated communities/events with unwanted gender-politics bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:16 AM
0

Since you've obviously taken Anthro 101, maybe you'd like to name a culture where men and women share the exact same responsibilities? What the separate responsibilities for each gender may be vary by culture, but the division by gender still exists.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:04 PM
10

Read that..."cognitive and behavioral effects of sexual arousal," doesn't that seem to tramp on the idea that "rape is all about power?" Which idea are they going to keep? They can either say we're all potential rapists because we can't control ourselves when we get a boner or that rape is about power and control not sex, but they can't say both.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:15 AM
11

Russell was a respected and much loved member of the team at Radio Coventry and Warwickshire... ...but not enough to take his complaints seriously or deal with an overbearing ogress in his workplace.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:00 AM
1

Since we have mountains of evidence showing how bad teen pregnancy is and how children in single-parent homes are disadvantaged, teen pregnancy/single motherhood should, by your logic, be "bad" enough. Both parties should be using birth control (and a separate campaign to encourage that would be great). Unfortunately, once the damage is done and there's a pregnancy the decisions regarding how to handle it are solely at the discretion of the woman involved, which is why the ads are targeting wome…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:02 PM
1

It is 'evenly' shared if you consider that the decision to abort/adopt/keep a child is solely at the discretion of the mother. That's why the ads are targeting women instead of men. I think it would be great if they followed up these ads with a different campaign encouraging men and women to use contraception.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:54 PM
0

I think it's fucking terrible that society has decided shame is bad thing. I think shame is grand. You should feel shame when you've done something bad or foolish. It helps you learn not to do it again. There are lots of studies that indicate single-parent homes aren't good for children, and even more about the terrible implications of teen pregnancy, so anything we can do to encourage people to avoid that situation is a net positive as far as I'm concerned. I think we need to spend less time wo…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:15 AM
4

Don't tell Adria Richards, but apparently even women find the word "dongle" funny. No word yet whether or not they find Amy Poehler funny.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:26 AM
0

That's the thing, though, and you say it yourself: women are pretending to be the under dogs They've had fifty+ years to set government and culture against us and are firmly entrenched and well-supplied. You'd better be glad "those people" fought well, because in this analogy, we're "those people," and we don't need to be the ones with our arms tied.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:35 PM
0

This just in: the men's movement isn't the US military, and this isn't a traditional, physical military conflict. If you're comparing the gender struggle in this country to what is arguably the best funded, best trained team of winners going against underfunded third world armies, you're making a mistake if you're thinking the men's movement is the US military and not the guerrillas in the jungle.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:25 PM
1

Unfortunately, whether it's ethical, moral, or honorable, there's not a lot of choice. If you're not willing to do what the opposition is doing, especially when the opposition has such an incredible advantage, you're unnecessarily handcuffing yourself and might as well give up the fight.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:37 AM
8

It's a bit late to be concerned about being "professional," Ms. Richards.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:25 AM
6

I think what they're saying is that Ms. Richards behavior validates that stereotype, which is damaging for gender relations.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:10 AM
3

Eh, so you'd censor the censor? I'd wager that Ms. Richards would argue that she didn't censor anyone, she merely reported their behavior and expressed her views. Petitioning Ms. Richard's employer to end her employment is no different: you're reporting her behavior (or at this point your knowledge of it--her employer should damn well know) and expressing your views about it. I will not support the suppression of free speech Private individuals/organizations are not held to the same standard as …
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:31 AM
5

Her site must be getting hammered...when I tried to open her homepage my browser ran some sort of "check" that was being run by some sort of DDoS prevention software...and the page has yet to open.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:13 AM
4

You're a daft git and I'm surprised you can construct complete sentences or operate something as complicated as a computer.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:08 PM
5

Rape is neither "normal" nor "common," which was the point of most EVERYTHING you failed to quote from my previous post. We don't take precautions against unwanted events because they're normal or common, but because we wish to avoid the consequences of those events. Just because drivers are going to try not to hit me doesn't mean I don't look both ways before crossing the street. Even if everyone at the pool were an Olympic-class swimmer we'd still have lifeguards. I don't really care what femi…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:44 PM
8

"Rape culture" is an idiotic buzzword that represents the delusions of extreme feminists who believe all of society is geared to give women the shaft. The idea that "rape culture" represents is that society condones or overlooks rape and sexual abuse, and when it doesn't it blames the alleged victim(s). What makes this completely moronic is that our society does not condone or overlook rape and sexual abuse, and in fact the mere accusation of having done such a thing is enough to irreparably dam…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:48 PM
-31

Oooooooh, it was on Apple. What a shock: The electronics manufacturer for people who are too stupid to use electronics! Seems like it would go hand-in-hand with drivel like that game.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:47 PM
66

You went to Buzzfeed. Did you honestly expect to find anything intelligent there? Don't you put that on us, Ricky Bobby.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:43 PM
4

My concern now would be that the Justice Minister would take steps to have the information Davie pulled up altered in future reports to reflect the "appropriate view" of women in the justice system. That's old hat here in the states, which is why I think federal non-elected positions should have 'term limits' of their own.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:10 AM
1

Sorry, but this is Reddit, where "I'm not the same kind of <insert group here> as those guys are, they're extremists" is laughed out of the room. If there were less solidarity among feminists and more infighting to resolve these disparities of principle/philosophy, I might be inclined not to take as simplistic a view of the movement. Unfortunately, there isn't any infighting. Feminists in general are too busy throwing stones at men from their glass houses to go next door and tell the Andrea Dwor…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:11 AM
2

Who wants to bet that either a) one of the girls from that class is going to be working there sometime in the future and/or b) the chubby kid talking about how it isn't right is going to be a patron?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:59 AM
1

The temperance movement wasn't a 'feminist' movement, but the majority of those involved with the temperance movement and/or its supporters were women. As for the "reality of modern feminism," as far as it goes in the US it's little more than an exercise in absolving women from any responsibility/accountability for their choices and seeking special rights and privileges for one gender at the expense of the other.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:48 AM
0

I have to agree with you. As much as I'd like to feel some aggravation, it's like reading something stupid on Gawker: For Christ's sake, you're reading Gawker/Yahoo! Shine...stupid is the defining feature of the landscape.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:35 AM
-7

Boys need a male role model. I guess changing that to "masculine role model" doesn't hurt if you want to be all liberal new-age touchy-feely, but despite how unpopular the opinion may be, I don't think it's quite the same. That's not to say there's anything wrong with homosexuals raising children. I've known at least one lesbian couple who were raising a little boy, and one of the grandfathers spent a lot of time with the boy. A male role model is important, but not so important that it absolute…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:18 PM
1

I guess you technically only need a penis to do the job, so...
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:54 PM
14

The response from the UT Student Union is basically just a lot of Orwellian double-speak for "if we don't agree with you, you shouldn't be allowed to speak." It's unfortunate that so many institutes of 'higher learning' are turning their backs on the marketplace of ideas.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:17 AM
4

I'm a Christian, and I have a hard time believing it's "true" that all women are daft gits because Eve was a fuck-up. If we are to assume all women are defective because they're descended from Eve, what does that say about all the men who are descended from Eve? We don't even get beyond her first two children before one of her male offspring becomes the first murderer. All men and women will be judged by God according to their own actions. Blaming the heritage of Eve for the failings of any mode…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:04 PM
6

While I'm generally disposed to agree that religious people and religion in general are mocked out-of-hand here on Reddit, I can't disagree with friestogo. It literally is a piece bashing women based on Old Testament theology.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:39 PM
7

Not that I think highly of Ann Coulter, but...isn't this exactly the sort of mind-set President Obama's "Julia" ad was meant to appeal to when it was placed?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:33 AM
1

If you say so. My experiences indicate something much different.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:13 AM
1

Of course it doesn't, but it casts doubt on the rest of the tale, especially in the mind of men who generally view groping and making out not as separate behaviors, but as behaviors that are engaged in as a lead-up to actual sex. This is likely because men aren't going to engage in groping and making out with women with whom they'd not have sex. Women, on the other hand (and I'm not one but I know a few and I base this statement on their behavior and things they've said to me) will engage in gro…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:49 AM
1

That depends on whether or not I admittedly followed him up to his hotel room under the impression that some drinking, groping, and making out were going to occur.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 01:45 AM
1

I didn't say that any more than I said she was hallucinating. I didn't realize we were going to play a game of put-some-words-in-my-mouth. The converse of "no woman has ever gotten raped while drunk," and what you appear to be arguing is "no woman has ever consented to sex while drunk," which is equally ridiculous. Furthermore, it's degrading to women to suggest that men can consent while intoxicated but women can't. Your reaction is "woman said she was raped, she was obviously raped." My reacti…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:15 PM
1

No one said she "hallucinated." I said her recollections weren't reliable. She also said she expected some making out and groping, which indicates to me there was a possibility she was a willing participant and changed her mind after the fact. I'm not going to say that her story isn't true, or that she isn't deserving of sympathy, but I'm not going to buy her story lock, stock, and barrel without some healthy skepticism, especially since the she throws in just enough details to make me doubt its…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:56 PM
-1

She said she was asleep. It doesn't mean she was. What we have here is a "she said," which isn't even as good as a "he said/she said." Sorry, but I've personally seen a few "got drunk and willingly did something stupid" (with someone else who was "too drunk" to consent) that almost turned into a "he raped me" when the regret set in. Getting drunk and doing something stupid with someone else who is drunk and doing something stupid shouldn't turn the other person into a rapist just because you don…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:46 PM
1

Because a person's memory during a period of intoxication is 100% reliable.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:25 AM
1

I've been rather intoxicated a few times when some "OH SHIT!!!" type of thing has occurred, and it is not unreasonable to assume that the effects of adrenaline and panic will overpower the effects of alcohol. I would think that "OMG THAT MAN IS ON TOP OF ME WITH HIS PENIS IN MY VAGINA" when one isn't expecting penetration would probably qualify as an "OH SHIT!!!" situation.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:14 AM
4

The system should favor the copyright owner, but in order for the copyright holder to exercise their rights, they should have to prove that 1) the content in question is copyrighted and that 2) the person filing the complaint is the copyright holder. The current YouTube system where anyone can file a DCMA complaint is seriously flawed.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:16 AM
2

It sounds like she's no longer happy with certain arrangements you both agreed upon (and which she probably suggested in the first place). The constant ridicule about you spending time with the kids suggests to me that she's not happy about you not having a job. There's probably other things happening with her about which you may not be aware since your communication has obviously broken down. While all the other precautions and advice here are good ideas, you need to talk to her if you want to …
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:19 AM
-2

Yes and no. As I said, pleasure is subjective. And yet you're arguing that despite it being subjective, we should assume that uncircumcised is better. There are forms of female that are less invasive than male circumcision as you probably know it. Yet for references to these "less invasive" procedures, you list three specific procedures that are more invasive, and follow up with a fourth bullet catch-all that includes piercing...which is more a fetish for western adults than something practiced …
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:48 PM
2

I understand what your saying, but again, my objection is this: there is no religion in which it is common for practitioners to remove their ears or the ears of their children. It doesn't exist. The purpose of the other individual's "analogy" was not for the purpose of demonstrating anything, it was, as usual, simply another attempt to make a guilt-by-association argument tying circumcision to practices that are either unusual or actually morally objectionable, and I assert that is specifically …
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:52 AM
1

I think this would be more relevant if you could find an example of any culture or religion that routinely removes their own ears, otherwise this is, as I said before, just more hypothetical half-assery in an attempt to connect circumcision with practices that would be considered freakish or out-of-the-norm.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:32 AM
1

You can argue about whether or not circumcision decreases or increases sexual pleasure. At least you're admitting that it is rational to believe such a thing, which makes me wonder why there is any point in arguing that either choice is inferior.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:24 AM
2

Many judges think mothers are intrinsically vulnerable and must be protected, as they are generally to be the parent with care of the children. Yet why should this be? If a mother has gone off with her lover, jeopardising the wellbeing of her children and demonstrating infidelity to their father, promise-breaking, deceit and selfishness, why should she be automatically regarded as the fitter parent to bring up the children? The answer is to restore issues of conduct to divorce and the subsequent…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:46 AM
0

My logic isn't flawed, your analogy is. You say you're using my logic to justify something most people would consider absurd, but most people do not consider circumcision absurd; you're in the minority. Your "analogy" isn't so much an analogy as it is a flawed comparison, like the one feminists developed to justify calling all sex rape, and goes something like this: Consensual sex is a penis in a vagina. Rape is a penis in a vagina. Therefore consensual sex is exactly the same as rape. Cutting o…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:13 AM
0

When you cut off the foreskin your brain accomodates the decrease in sensitive. If my brain is compensating for the decrease in sensitivity, how would I notice there has been a decrease? Maybe that's why any "difference in pleasure is difficult to measure?" So you come in to tell me that my body compensates for the loss of the foreskin, proving that there is really no harm done at all. Then you go on to say that you can't really measure any difference in pleasure, but there's "no doubt" that des…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:01 AM
1

What if the sky were green and you liked the taste of sweaty man taint? It doesn't matter, because we're not talking about ears, the sky, or your favorite Pez flavor. We're talking about circumcision. It never ceases to amaze me that you can't talk about this subject without some kind of retarded "what-if" scenario. If circumcision is as terrible as all of you seem to think it is, you should just be able to point to what's so fucking terrible about it without pulling ridiculous hypothetical situ…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:41 PM
2

We allegedly have that here, but look at the circlejerk it's become.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:31 AM
-10

That seems fairly subjective. Maybe I think I have better sex because I last longer and fulfill my partner's needs better since I don't finish more quickly due to being over-stimulated by additional nerves. Under those conditions, mine functions better yours.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:15 AM
-9

Now it's doubly funny that you complain about me refusing to "accept other points," since I'm fairly certain the very first thing I said was an explanation of why this was a choice left to the parent. Not only do you not accept premises that lay outside your own world-view, you also appear to forget they've been uttered.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:10 AM
-13

Serves no purpose you agree with, you mean. Given that I still enjoy all the benefits of having a penis, I'm not sure how you're quantifying "functions better." In fact, I'm probably better off without the foreskin you seem to think "provides lubrication" since it may have greater susceptibility to traumatic epithelial disruptions (tears) during intercourse, providing a portal of entry for pathogens [Szabo R, Short RV. How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection? BMJ. 2000 Jun 10;32…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:47 AM
-17

Yet even without that "massive amount" of "thousands" of nerves, my circumcised penis works just fine...and without any extra "lubricant." Religion is not simply "tradition," and as I said, the rates of death or permanent unintended injury due to circumcision are unbelievable low, less than .001% based on what people who hold your point-of-view have linked in the past. The procedure carries a very low risk of harm and does nothing to impair the use of the organ, and the only objection you have m…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:17 AM
-15

Because he's the boy's parent, and human tradition dating back through time immemorial is that parents induct their children into their religious practice(s). Circumcision is part of that practice for some cultures/religions. I expect you're going to pull out the perfunctory "but it's just like female genital mutilation" card in response to that, because it's part of the shtick, but the two aren't comparable. Circumcision, when performed correctly, carries a low risk of infection, complications,…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:37 AM
-16

Thankfully, you're not the arbiter of who is or isn't a member of this community. Not everyone in /r/MensRights is an intactivist, and circumcision is only one of a very large number of issues discussed in this subreddit. It cannot even be said to be one of the defining issues of the movement, since this sub is far more focused on divorce, child custody, and false rape allegations. This subreddit is supposed to be a 'safe space' for men. If there is anything that does not belong here, it's haras…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:08 AM
-23

"Your old book?" Is religious bigotry really all you have to offer? There's a big difference between "chopping off bits of a baby's body," which implies just doing so willy-nilly for funsies, and what the gentleman said was done to himself that he also plans for his own children. The fact that you have to exaggerate in such a juvenile manner to argue your case, and drop the /r/atheism-style "LOLUDUMRELIGIOUSPEOPLE," does little to make your case, and only serves to make you look like an ass.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:01 AM
0

Just as I find it amusing that you would deride me for expressing my disdain for /r/atheism, since unrestrained hatred of anyone with religious beliefs seems to motivate them more than their atheist beliefs do.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:10 PM
10

This sort of post is the reason why those of us who can't abide smug, self-righteous stupidity unsubscribe from /r/atheism so we never have to look at it any of it again.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:27 AM
1

Not the point, when you "teach someone a lesson," it's all pain and superficial injury. If you're just roughing a guy up you don't want to do anything that keeps him from moving around the next day, usually because he owes you money and he can't pay it back if he can't work because you messed him up too bad. When you're pounding someone about the head-and-neck with a fucking club, you aren't trying to "teach him a lesson," you're trying to fuck his shit up and/or kill him.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 11:46 PM
4

You don't whack a guy in the head with blunt objects when you're "teaching him a lesson."
/r/MensRights28/07/12 11:57 AM
1

I'm not comparing it to anything. I don't think you understand that, and that's part of the problem with you guys. You cannot rationally discuss circumcision on its merits and detriments, and are constantly attempting to link it to other practices that are only tangentially related because genitals are involved. Circumcision is in no way equivalent to any of the practices you're discussing, and even suggesting that it is is ludicrous for a variety of factors I've already listed in the post to wh…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:01 AM
0

Are you really going to compare circumcision which, in the vast majority of cases, has a low risk of death or serious injury and doesn't impair the function(s) of the penis to practices that result in death or permanent injury in many cases and is performed for the sole purpose of impairing the sexual pleasure of the person upon which it's being performed? If you are, that's an apples-to-oranges comparison.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:46 AM
0

You're missing the point, which is that there are more things that are statistically more lethal than circumcision. If your main concern is truly "one death is one too many," which it isn't, then there are far better places to focus your attention. Your argument is disingenuous because a) you started out by lying in fabricating the claim that... circumcision deaths are categorized as a death during birth so they can keep the deaths due to circumcision statistics low ...and b) the issue of infant…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:28 AM
0

It's relevant because children in cars and planes are often there not of their own volition, but because their parents are traveling and taking them along. Those poor, poor children were forced into those crashing cars and planes, we need laws against children in cars and planes! Not allowing children to ride in cars and planes makes the death of children from crashes 100% preventable.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:25 AM
0

Is one death too many in auto accidents? Is it too many in plane crashes? If your best rationale for outlawing circumcision is "one death is too many," you have bigger fish to fry because there are a lot of other very common things that kill a lot more people. I doubt that anyone is categorizing circumcision as "death during birth" because it's usually performed well after birth has taken place.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:05 AM
6

I don’t think much more than “Magic Mike” or “Fifty Shades of Gray” needs to be said in response to this. Obviously, “Magic Mike” reverses the gender roles, but nowhere have I heard anyone lament that women are “pornsick bitches” when they objectify men, which leads me to assume that the objection isn’t to objectification, but to who is being objectified. That’s a blatant double-standard. “Magic Mike” makes it easy to see that allure of being in the dominant position isn’t an allure to just men,…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:33 AM
1

Yes, as I was just saying to mythin, we all agree that all the factors we've discussed are important, we just don't agree on what priority they take. Given the opinions that mythin and yourself hold, your conclusions make perfect sense. The conclusions are understandable, we just disagree on underlying principles.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:53 AM
2

I'm sorry you feel that way, because unlike many of these threads, where I get guys full of unrestrained crazy vitriol, like thrway_1000, who are transparently pushing this issue as part of some other agenda, you and wafflebunny have been most pleasant and reasonable. Your objections haven't slid into some variety of unmitigated hate against religion in general or Jews in particular, or become some weird echo of feminist screed about vaginas projected onto a penis, or a backlash against a societ…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:46 AM
-1

It must take a lot of bravery to be an anti-religious zealot on Reddit. 5 points to Slytherin.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 09:20 PM
-1

I gave them below, you dismissed them... I didn't dismiss them "out of hand," and in fact explained why I didn't find your asserted negatives convincing. Yes we have, you just choose to disagree. I think we have different ideas regarding the meaning of the word "compelling." You know what, before I respond... And here we end up, as always, waiting to board the Hypothetical Express, with stops in What If and Fantasyland. How do you gentlemen (and ladies, if there are any) expect to convince anyon…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 09:16 PM
-1

...and case-in-point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:50 PM
-2

Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post: We could deal in hypothetical situations all day, but that's pointless. Circumcision isn't ear-pointing, or piercing, or removing a female's clitoris...it's circumcision, and as it's practiced in this country, it is a very low-risk practice that does not impair the function of the penis. With that in mind, especially in light of the religious considerations involved, I cannot find any legitimate objection to the practice. If you would like to discuss circu…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:49 PM
-1

You seriously believe the motivation of those opposed to circumcision is a motivation to one up feminists? In all cases? No. In more than a few? Yes. There is only freedom of religion when that religion does not negatively effect the state of other individuals. Please list the "negative effect" that circumcision has on the men who receive one. I'm not sure what the downside is, and if there was one, I'd intimately familiar with it, because I've been circumcised. Does the size of the religion mat…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:38 PM
-1

I'd neither support them nor object to them doing it. Would I find it weird? Possibly, but would that be grounds to object, or to interfere in familial matters that don't concern me? Would pointing the child's ear cause them to lose hearing? Is it part of a religious/cultural heritage a parent would want to pass on to their child? We could deal in hypothetical situations all day, but that's pointless. Circumcision isn't ear-pointing, or piercing, or removing a female's clitoris...it's circumcisi…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:07 PM
1

Well, since I was only pointing out the problem with the previous gentleman's proposition (that the two are similar), and not making that proposition myself, I don't see the issue.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:54 PM
-1

But under our system, children can't provide consent, which is why the parent's consent is not just necessary, but the determining factor.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:33 PM
0

Reading through both your posts, I note three things: 1) In those places where the linked information disputes any correlation between circumcision and disease transmission/infection, all objections are levied against "the evidence from the African random-controlled trials," which, as I stated, are not related to the studies referenced by the CDC which do show correlation. 2) There are only two objections to the practice on the grounds that "religious, cultural, and parental rights end when it c…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:25 PM
0

There's nothing hyperbolic about a direct comparison, which I even explained when I made it. Holding religion above human rights only makes you seem inhumane. Spoken like someone who is willfully ignoring the fact that religious rights are a human right. If you could "tear apart all of [my] information," and you've "already provided it elsewhere," how much time would you really be wasting with a simple cut-and-paste? Very little, I'd think, which makes me think you're copping out.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:54 PM
-4

While "more painful yet, and irreversible," circumcision carries very little risk and does no lasting harm since the penis still functions normally. I find this obstinate opposition to a practice that you're neither obligated nor compelled to have performed on your own children to be little more than some visceral emotional reaction that ignores any facts that undermines its suppositions.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:46 PM
-4

You can see it as anything you like...which is exactly what extremist feminist do when they say all sex is rape. It doesn't change the reality of the situation. How does it "threaten the lives of boys more often than most want to admit" when even in these threads on the subjects those who hold your view have to admit that it causes "complications," as you put it, permanent damage, or death only in a very small fraction of a percent of cases? Is there someone here stating, or even suggesting, tha…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:38 PM
-5

A procedure with a very low degree of risk that does not impair the future function of the organ in question does not constitute "harm," and only someone who thinks in hyperbole would compare it to stoning and/or honor killing. The thinking you're demonstrating is like this: Stoning/honor killing is a religious practice. Circumcision is a religious practice. Therefore, circumcision is stoning/honor killing. Or, to put it in a context that will probably hit home a lot harder in this community: Ra…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:55 PM
-6

What you label as "cosmetic surgery" other label as "religious rite." There do indeed have to be limits, but we're discussing a practice that is thousands of years old that is a revered in sects of at least two major religions. You're suggesting trampling on both parental consent and religious freedom to curtail a practice with a very low degree of risk that does not impair the future function of the organ in question. With that in mind, I prefer to err on the side of religious/cultural toleranc…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:32 PM
-2

There are still others that do, and I'm sure there are other things in Georgia that would be illegal for a minor to obtain on their own that they can obtain with the consent of their parent, such as piercings. I'm sorry, but it just seems silly to make this "lack of consent" argument when it's generally accepted that parents give consent for their minor children in the majority of situations.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:58 PM
2

pro tip Upvoting for unintentional puns.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:34 PM
-4

Just like underage tattoos are. Just like everything else that requires consent for a minor, parents can (and some do) consent to them getting a tattoo. So when a parent consents to their child receiving a circumcision, it's already very similar.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:33 PM
1

Even with the WHO study debunked, there are still several that show a correlation between circumcision and reduced disease transmission.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 11:51 PM
2

Obviously anyone who chooses to believe in a religion, but in this case Jews in particular...you don't even have to scroll that far through the guy's post history to find the word "Zionist" in bold print in one of his posts. He's another one of those /r/atheism crackpots who is as intolerant as the religious people they're always ranting about and looking at his post history, it's not surprising to find a little antisemitism coming from him.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:43 PM
2

Either this was a great troll and clever satire, or the person that wrote this is so unbelievably stupid that we're lucky they can dress themselves...check out how they spelled "utopia." The thing is a laugh riot either way.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:10 AM
2

Hey, that's nothing, just take a look at the post history of Mr. "This Antisemitism Argument Is Bullshit..." Well, wouldn't wanna disturb the racial purity of Israel. By the way, Israel needs a lebensraum .. For those not familiar with the colorful reference, lebensraum is direct reference to Hitler's policy of expansion and genocide. A common thread among antisemitic groups is comparing modern Israel with Nazi Germany, and I'm not the least bit surprised there's the preemptive "someone's going …
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:51 PM
-1

I didn't realize anyone was "chasing down and forcing circumcision" on anyone else. The more you (allegedly) know...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:45 AM
-1

Well, I guess there's proof of at least one.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:44 AM
-1

Wow, "clownshoes," be still my (almost) hurt feewings. Haven't had to do clever retorts since middle-school, I'm guessing? Still not seeing it, too many "my dick isn't nasty" guys railing out there for me to hear you over the din. Honestly, there's already an /r/Intactivists forum for this nutty bullshit. We don't need it in /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:43 AM
-2

Of course not...little blighters move too fast. Just joking, of course, but like I said, you're complaining about being called out for Antisemitism then dropping every thinly veiled trope you possibly can after doing it....you're complaining about something you're setting yourself up for in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:41 AM
-6

OK, because "orthodox nonsense" doesn't contain even the remotest hint of (anti-)religious bigotry or anything. I can't imagine where anyone would get the idea that there's a little bit of hate for the Jews coming from you guys. Seriously, you're pretty much writing a self-fulfilling prophecy there. You might as well just say, "I know I'm going to be called an Antisemite by those filthy fucking Jews."
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:45 PM
-1

Out of curiosity...who are these "many people" that had the procedure as an infant that are fighting for the choice of others? The vast majority of you guys ranting and raving get bent when someone brings up the issue of hygiene and tell us how your dicks aren't dirty. Where are the circumcised "intactivists?"
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:35 PM
-3

That'd be a great argument if those two things were even remotely equivalent, which they aren't.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:31 PM
-4

What? This "made up bullshit?"
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:25 PM
-7

No, but he probably hasn't referred to Judaism as "hideous" or jumped at the chance to say "victimey Jew," or assumed anyone who disagrees with him is a Jew. All three of which are things I've personally experienced in discussions in these idiotic anti-circumcision threads. Stop hanging out with Antisemites and people will probably stop accusing you of being one.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:24 PM
-6

I'm not sure how they're "misinformed" about the prevention of STDs when it's an established scientific fact.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:19 PM
-1

Ignoring the fact that no one is obligated to explain themselves to you, you get a big ol' Downvoting Roman thumb-to-the-ground from me just because I'm tired of seeing this shit in /r/MensRights for any number of reasons. It's been my experience so far that those of you making this "circumcision is bad" argument are as hysterical as any unhinged feminist, and I've seen more than a few indications of religious/cultural bigotry, especially Antisemitism, from the lot of you. The various brands of …
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:36 PM
-2

Well, so long as you're admitting "it isn't a men's right issue," feel free to leave it the hell out of /r/MensRights. This anti-circumcision thing is nutty as hell and got old faster than a bunch of bananas.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:46 AM
0

Agreed, and given the "conversations" I've had with some of these intactivist guys lately, I'm not sure I want to be affiliated with a bunch of anti-Semites.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:44 AM
1

I'm not even reading what others are typing nor have I refered to you as a jew. You do seem to be a rare snowflake in that regard, but it should make you wonder about the "company" you keep. I was raised in an Anabaptist religion. Infants weren't baptized because it was believed that accepting Christ as Lord and Savior was a personal decision that couldn't be made for you by your parents. However, I understand not everyone shares my personal beliefs. I don't expect Atheists to send their childre…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:33 AM
1

Not only do 'cut' women and 'cut' men suffer the exact same loss of sensation (how that WOULDN'T be the case, given the IDENTICAL composition of the tissue, is beyond me), but male genital mutilation is specifically called for to reduce sexual sensation in men...and yes, that includes the fucking Bible. And so did Dr. Kellogg. For the SAME reasons. It is not the exact same loss of sensation, and the idea is preposterous. The clitoris is far more important for women than the foreskin is for us. T…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:00 AM
1

Your arguments are that way actually. Apparently anyone who doesn't want to chop off a baby's foreskin is a dirty slob? The fact that most of you guys can't discuss this without exaggeration and hyperbole proves what I say about you being emotional about the subject. I may have made a few wisecracks about dirty dicks and minutemen, but I can admit you don't have to be circumcised to have a clean penis or last more than 20 seconds in the sack. You guys seem incapable of even admitting there are b…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 03:11 AM
1

Doesn't the ban on veils violate the rights of those women who choose to wear one because of their faith? The ban is, if anything, driven completely by feminism in that it assumes a woman wouldn't wear a veil unless she was being forced to do so. It assumes oppression and does not consider that it may be a personal choice. We're not France (Thank God), and our Constitution protects the religious liberties of its citizens, even those that make choices for themselves and their families with which …
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:45 AM
1

An ideolgue who knows their argument flies in the face of their own rhetoric, but their bias won't allow them to admit it...I guess you can smell your own kind? It is different, and it has nothing to do with who "hurts more." What is done to women is done to control them by removing their ability to enjoy sex. Circumcised men still enjoy sex. So far, the only argument any of you deranged whack-jobs have come up with to even remotely make circumcision sound even slightly bad are sad attempts to l…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:27 AM
1

I'm neither genetically nor religiously Jewish, but thanks for making unfounded assertions. It's probably made it easier to go on that thinly veiled anti-Semitic rant. Circumcision is in no way comparable to what is done to women in the third world. What is done to women is done to control them by removing their ability to enjoy sex. Circumcision does not remove a man's ability to have sex, and if anything, enhances it. We have a secular government, that does not mean we are a secular society. O…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:01 AM
1

There's a lot more to what your parents choose for you than proper medical care. Where you live isn't your choice. Where you go to school isn't your choice. What you eat isn't your choice. The idea that parents should not induct their children into their family's religion flies in the face of what has been normal for the entirety of human history. You're right that my preferences don't matter, but you miss the flip side of that coin: neither do your preferences. I'm not willing to meddle in peop…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:44 AM
-5

There's a lot of things we don't get to choose that are chosen for us by our families during our formative years. If you guys are that attached to a flap of skin that turns you into Johny Quick and increases your chances to spread and contract disease, I can just imagine what your fingernails look like. We can easily make everything a "men's issue" the way the hairy armpit crowd in the feminist camp has made everything a "woman's issue," but if we start ignoring the other factors involved, like …
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:03 PM
-3

I've already had the conversation about how hyperbolic and ridiculous the "mutilation" line is with one of you intactivist this week. Once was enough. If this is just some goofy attempt by you guys to "raise awareness" or something by comparing circumcision to female genital mutilation, it's way off base
/r/MensRights06/07/12 11:58 AM
-7

What if the man is Jewish? Are his "rights as a man" more important than his religious rights? If we're just going to start shouting "MEN, MEN, MEN, MEN!!!" in the face of everything regardless of other considerations (and by "we," I mean "you") and couching EVERYTHING in terms of the male gender, we might as well hang it up. That's exactly the way feminist think and act, and if you guys are just going to take that long walk off the short pier, you can take it without me.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 11:54 AM
-16

Trying to hijack men's rights to push other agendas...you mean like the ridiculous circumcision drivel I keep seeing?
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:06 AM
-4

This is a straw man, since there's no common definition of the world "mutilate" that encompasses that meaning. The first definition of the word Merriam-Webster gives is: Well, it's ironic that this is a "straw man" on two counts, the first being that in the short time we've been conversing I've come to believe you have a lot in common with the Scarecrow from The Wizard of Oz, and the second thing that makes it ironic is that when I look around the ol' interwebs for information on mutilation, I f…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:15 AM
-1

Then explain to me why circumcision is not mutilation. It's not mutilation in the way you're using the term because you're using the term to describe maiming, which is the loss of, or incapacity to use, a bodily member. I've had a piece of tissue removed from said member, not the member itself, and it still functions properly, so obviously I'm not maimed. You can only say it is mutilation in the sense of ritual mutilation, which describes many different practices that alter the body according to…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:39 PM
-1

Obviously it's up for debate, because you say I'm mutilated and I say you're completely unhinged. You have no way of knowing what my culture is, and as such have no frame of reference to make any value judgments of it. I was under the impression we were talking about circumcision. If you're going to try lumping something specific in with a whole list of other practices that most everyone is going to agree is completely vile, you're no better than the sort of women who suggest that any type of in…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:20 AM
-1

I have a circumcision. I'm not "mutilated." I'm not sure where this overblown and overwrought ridiculousness came out of and I don't particularly care, but I'm really tired of seeing it. I can care about the welfare and rights of my fellow males without having to agree with your particular brand of dumbassery. If you don't want your kids to have a circumcision, no one is forcing you, yet you think, for whatever reason, that you and/or those that agree with you should be able to step into the per…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:26 AM
-1

I know it's popular here, but I agree with the author on pretty much every point. In fact, I'm so tired of this circumcision crap that I would very much appreciate it if we could separate it into its own subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:16 AM
4

Thanks for saving me the trouble of the Google search.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:23 AM
4

I would hope. I don't know how they do with fundraising, but their membership is relatively non-existent now. Many women are either turning away from the feminism nonsense or see no benefit in it for themselves.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:22 PM
0

If you tell a woman "no" what she hears is "you're ugly." You can't judge that kind of thinking by reasonable standards, because there is nothing reasonable about it.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:40 PM
2

Men no longer want to have relationships with women and are "dropping out" of life? Gee, I wonder why?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:33 PM
10

To be fair, "feminazi" describes a particular type of feminist, not women/feminist in general, and "white knight" is probably the most flattering derogatory term to currently exist in the English language, and also describes a very specific person/group of people.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:47 AM
50

He didn't say the idea of slut-shaming was wrong. He brought it up as a comparison, saying that the "ur gay" of gay-shaming for men is analogous with the "ur a whore" of slut-shaming for women. Both enforce archaic gender roles by means of making their victims for ashamed.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:37 AM
11

My first objection to her article (and where I stopped reading) is that it isn't Limbaugh or conservatives who have made feminist into a "man-hater" caricature. Women did that for themselves, and it's probably the one thing feminism has to hold up as an example in that regard.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:23 AM
27

The man who wrote this is a a pretentious jackenape who only spouts idiocy of this caliber out of the hope of receiving female attention. It's practically the same thing as a dog performing silly tricks for Beggin' Strips. I hope he chokes on his Beggin' Strips. It will give him a proper perspective and disabuse him of the sort of silly notions he puts forth in that diatribe.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:30 AM
1

You seem to be under the impression that I'm saying the double-standard is a legal one. I am not. I am saying it's a societal double-standard, though it is societal double-standard that sometimes becomes a legal double-standard (such as in cases of abused male spouses being removed from their homes after reporting their abusive partner). The behavior this woman engaged in is excused at best and lauded at exemplary at worst by a large, mostly female section of our society so long as the offending…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:43 PM
6

I don't, but that's not the point. The point is that when women behave in this fashion they're patted on the head and asked what the mean man did to them to make them behave so abhorrently (because somehow it's the man's fault she couldn't control herself). It's "funny" (this picture apparently originated in the funny or funny pics subreddit) when women do it. "That man had it coming." When men do something like this, they're considered brutes and neanderthals. It's a double-standard, and it's u…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:24 AM
2

I think it's amusing that he talks about "the politics of resentment" without realizing that the MRM only exists because of the outcome of years of female resentment toward men given form in the legal system.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:48 AM
14

People's rights do matter, regardless of how deserving they may be of whatever harm their 'victim' brings to them. Put the shoe on the other foot: If she had cheated on him, and he tossed all her things out on the curb and vandalized her car, it wouldn't be "funny," he'd be arrested for domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:22 AM
3

Oh, yes, how silly of me.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:53 AM
0

Fear Factor was pretty stupid, too, but he still cashed in on that payday. The opinions of actors/celebrities/entertainers are worth only slightly more than a handful of shit.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:53 AM
5

Sadly, that's true, even sadder... “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 20…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:46 PM
7

This should probably be given a new title: How I ruined my marriage in 30 days or less. I'm almost tempted to take bets on when the separation begins.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:43 PM
5

Makes you wonder what happened to "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:31 PM
-6

While we're being outraged about mutilating ourselves, shouldn't we also be pissed that vasectomies are a thing? Circumcision is nothing like female genital mutilation. Our junk still works properly after the procedure about which you're outraged (or should if the procedure is properly performed).
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:04 PM
-5

I've got a circumcision, and I'm actually pretty happy with it.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:10 PM
1

You had me until you said "rationality of /r/atheism," then my head exploded right off my body in laughter. The thoughts you expressed were nice, but "being nice" has rarely moved the ball forward on any issue.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:49 PM
12

You can't have a rational conversation with irrational people.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter