TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jubway Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by jubway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I assume they are bored. They are not the one in power, the queen is. So they need something to do. Whoring is out of the question because the queen could just have them executed, hunting gets tiresome and doesn't bring a lot of recognition, but war makes heros. Why not conquer a neighbor and be known as a heroic general?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 11:33 PM
0

If no one follows the order, is it any different from the order never being given? You're assuming kings and queens married for love. And while yes, she absolutely could say no, she would have also irritated the leader of her military. There is also historical precedent of kings usurping queens, marriage notwithstanding. So the queen would be better off letting the king go to war and hoping he dies along the way than ticking off the king by denying him his campaign, forcing him to look locally f…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:32 PM
0

If an order is given, but not followed, was the order ever really given? And this was based on a belief that Queens were more likely to instigate a war, so defending land isn't a factor. You'll have to go further up in the thread to where a commentor provided statistics where married queens (whose husbands were in charge of the military) were more likely to start a war. And if the king, who was married to the queen for strictly political purposes wants to go on a lengthy (and potentially fatal) …
/r/MensRights30/03/20 01:41 PM
1

My bad. The problem with circular arguments like this or the chicken vs egg debate is that when someone else joins in, you can't always tell if they are going in the same direction as you. Reducing the stigmatization of seeking assistance would be a good starting point. I would wager that a lot of the economic and social support available to young women is also available to young men, but the young men feel uncomfortable accepting it either due to social ridicule or some ingrained belief that ma…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 06:12 PM
0

1) Queens can certainly be men. Yas. 2) Wars are fought. And who does the fighting? I'll give you a hint, it is not those in power. 3) Another commentor had provided you statistics with how wars were more likely to occur when the ruler is a married queen, with the king in charge of the military. I'm sure those kings had absolutely no part in pushing for a war so they feel less useless. ;) ;)
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:02 PM
1

If there are no employees at Walmart, the corporate policies achieve nothing because there is no one to enforce it. So like I said, if there are no soldiers, there is no war.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:38 PM
-1

If there are no soldiers, how would there be a war? And the soldiers are men. Men caused the wars. Checkmate.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 01:15 AM
5

Famous actors were voicing Disney movies prior to Aladdin too. Additionally, Robin Williams wasn't a breaking or turning point in animated movies. He was in Fern Gully released earlier that very year, and it had nowhere near the same box office impact. As someone else stated, the real tragedy of Williams' work on Aladdin is how Disney did not honor the request to not use him for marketing.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/20 12:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter