TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

justWork3 Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by justWork3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh you mean Rosenbaum. I'm pretty sure that was also ruled self defense Oh it was. But when it happened, people didn't know that. They heard gunshots, saw a guy with assault rifle run from the scene and a dude was dead. In the heat of the moment when a person who just shot someone runs away, what would you do? Gather a jury of peers and litigate? No you act, run away, yell, try to take him down, whatever. They didn't try to disarm him, Grosskreutz admitted to pointing a gun at him This is true, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:47 PM
1

And through all that, not even in a single session was there any mention of him being an active shooter? Are you really sure you want to believe that story? Wait hold on. Do you not know this? It was mentioned in the case and scrutinized that he shot Rosenbaum. And I've seen the video, and it was discussed in the case that that shooting is what caused people to yell "stop him, he just shot someone". As he ran away from that scene, it makes him an active shooter. Later he shot Huber and grosskrue…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:53 PM
0

Kyle shot people attacking him. Duh. But they were attacking him because he shot someone. I don't deny people were attacking him. But the evidence also shows that people were only attacking him because he was an active shooter running away from the scene of a potential crime. This makes the legal side fairly straightforward, but it doesn't really change the fact that he got away with shooting innocent protesters. That you ignore this shows where your ideology lies. If you consider violent protes…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:23 PM
0

I can confidently say that currently the left is the main enemy of free speech. Based off what? Like what specifically are they doing? The right is using CRT fear mongering to whitewash history. Isn't that a free speech issue? They try to change textbooks all the time to insert their agenda into elementary school textbooks. With Kyle Rittenhouse we see their is protection against shooting protesters. Isn't that allowing violence against free speech? And don't forget the only reason Kyle was able…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 04:44 PM
1

I've yet to meet anyone on the left that doesn't follow up "I support free speech" with a "But", I mean, there are known exceptions to free speech. Can't tell fire in a building unless there is a fire for example. And the whole twatter, EweTube, Fakebook censorship is a tangled mess. It doesn't technically apply to the first amendment because the first amendment was about government censorship. So the question becomes a very difficult one of where you draw the line of what a private sector compa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:58 PM
1

Just the arguments you used was shockingly similar to what they used. No for sure. That was what I was going for. Sometimes you gotta know your enemy, right? Since we are having the meta discussion, I think it is important to push back against this right wing narrative that they are pro free speech. It's wrong, and the left is truly pro free speech. In fact, the only reason their arguments work is because the left cares about free speech. The left hears "oh you can't decide not to platform me be…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:48 PM
1

free speech is a right wing talking point, I'm glad you agree, as unfortunate as it is. You must have misunderstood. I said "liberals don't believe in free speech" is a right wing talking point. I don't see the right actually believing in free speech anywhere. They talk a big talk, I don't see them walking the walk.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:41 PM
1

But bringing up the past means little when the leftists are now The past helps us understand the present. Surely that is meaningful. And no, it's no longer a core tennet of the left. This is a right wing talking point. It has no basis in reality. You can't promote free speech and then support websites/goverments/etc. policing speech. You're changing the argument. The person I replied to specifically said that academia is censoring conservatives. This is something, as someone who grew up in a rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:30 PM
1

Oh nah. I'm just trying my hand arguing like a conservative. You know, slandering people recklessly, with little regard for facts and logic. Turns out right wingers hate their tactics used against them... but yeah I'll stop. I hate being this bad faith anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 02:55 PM
1

Have you been living under a rock for the past 10 years? Have you? Doxxing and censorship is the leftist debate tactic. No, it's just that whiny right wingers are just mad that sometimes their tactics are used against them. Remember gamergate and all the lefties who had to literally uproot their life because they got doxed and swatted? All the death threats the families of the Sandy hook shootings received once they were doxed? Remember McCarthyism, the locking up of anyone with Communist aka le…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 02:54 PM
1

Well, no. My main argument is that this is one case and it isn't really even censorship. It's a one off case of someone going off the rails and backing bad ideas and losing their job over it. They even hired the dude back several years later. It's just a bad example of censorship
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 02:45 PM
1

So you notice, right in the first paragraph that his speeches weren't cancelled. People protested his ideas, but academia never censored him. You could argue that they shouldn't have done that. I'd agree. But that not censorship. That is people protesting. When conservatives protest outside abortion clinics, that is t them "censoring abortion". That's protesting. Conservatives are just whiners who can't make it in academia. They need to feel like the victim so they try to make it seem like they …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 02:43 PM
1

Haha. No it's cool that the only example you can give of Leftist censorship is tenuous at best and probably a pedo. It's kinda what I expect from righties.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:29 AM
-4

I mean, sure. But he is also super sketchy with his ties to Epstein and Xi. But I suppose you want me to not talk about that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:15 AM
-7

The mainstream left is increasingly pro-censorship, Bulllllll shit. Gonna need a source on that. The right is always the censoring type. when Harvard Dean Larry Summers was fired for putting forward the “male variability hypothesis” Ok. And what happened? He put forward his hypothesis and...he is still dean at Harvard? What censorship are you referring to? Some people disagreed with him: boo hoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:58 AM
-2

Wait, do you think academics are censoring things? Academics are notorious for being the very first to be censored and for being open. Can you give me an example of academic censoring?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:20 AM
8

So TRP is about misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:18 PM
1

Interesting. I guess, I don't see why those are pills. "try to make yourself more desirable" is like dating advice 101. Have confidence? Literally the most common trait women say they want. If you want to be more physically attractive then "get a good haircut/facial hair" and "wear clothes that fit well" is basically the only possible advice besides the one you forgot which is "go to the gym". None of this is red or blackpill. This is what literally everyone tells you. I guess what I am trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 01:45 AM
1

What works then? What did they tell you to do that helped women like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 04:12 PM
8

And the proper response to that is "well, I want to enjoy it too"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 02:55 PM
2

Free market. Why should employees just be given things? I mean, they won't be just given it. I think they would have to demand it. If everyone started demanding it, companies wouldn't be able to hire without providing it. That's free market right? Wouldn't this be fine by your logic / free market logic? ​ No. I like actually making the rich pay. Which both sides talk a good game and do nothing except tax me Ok. What do you propose to make the rich pay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 10:08 PM
2

corporate taxes do indirectly help the workers. You can't argue that a company doing well, typically treats employees well, raises, no layoffs, actually hiring, come on. ​ How much does it help them? More than the C suite execs. No, or the stock holders, which they are of course also. ​ How do you stop that[?] ​ YES! You missed the most important part of my post. I think the problem is that ownership is heavily concentrated at the top of most corporations today. I think workers need to start dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 09:38 PM
2

​ This is actually really interesting because that tax break will go away soon. He did that on purpose so that the middle class would feel like their taxes went down. It will stop after 8 years. But wouldn't you know? The decreases in taxes to the 1 percent don't go away....hmmm... ​ ​ Natural gas,has risen 3x since Biden. Hold on a second. I went to your links about Natural Gas and Crude prices and the first link doesn't work, and the second link is for the UK. Both are for futures markets, whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 04:10 PM
2

if you look through history, the socialists/communists absolutely hate the middle class, especially upper middle class bourgeois for example. ​ Making shit up I see. Got a source for that? ​ Trump lowered taxes ​ For the rich. And No, it didn't trickle down got energy costs very low Retail energy prices have been steadily Going UP. Crude oil Has jumped all over the place and is on the way up for the past 3 years. So this is false US did not have to import gas and oil Also false. Net imports have…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 09:35 PM
2

I mean, Hillary isn't a socialist really; and in the same way that conservatives are republican. Hillary can't be socialist because of exactly what you say: they hate the middle class ( Although, as a sidebar, I think a more nuanced take is not so much that they hate the middle class but that the uni-party is funded by and thus serves the rich/elites). Socialism is about ensuring that the society at large reaps the benefits of labor and productivity instead of just the owner class. This is bad f…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 08:36 PM
2

Bruh. That's obvious. The left has been saying that mainstream media serves the rich for literal decades and we are thrilled that all the minion conservatives are finally catching up. But conservative theory always serves the elite. And Trump was and is no different. You can tell me that Hill-Dawg does too and all I will say is "welcome to the world". At least some of the time we can use democrats to actually pass policy that serves the middle class and poor. Republicans do everything you say an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 06:57 PM
2

Interestingly, I have read those. They were strange but you have to be a conspiracy theorist to think they were implying child pedo rings. They didn't seem out of the ordinary to anyone without paper and string on their wall. Also, I don't follow mainstream media. I tend to read half an article and then look for source material. Because of this I don't tend to get sucked into any of the stupid theories, including the pee tapes. There wasn't any evidence of that, only hearsay. But let me tell you…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 06:00 PM
2

Maybe conservatives are just bad at academic thinking. They tend to be better at making things up and asserting they are true rather than reasoning from first principles. That's why they make their own schools like Brigham Young and Trinity that peddle made-up professions like theology and assert their truth and usefulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 05:50 PM
3

I think you've been a bit duped. Trump certainly presented himself like the savior of the middle class. But he never did anything for them. He just continued the charade. He gave out massive tax cuts for the rich and didn't do a single thing to change the power balance. And why would he? He's just another fat cat who doesn't understand the real problems. Sure he was edgy and thats fun and all. He's all talk and no walk. Or rather he just walks for the rich like everyone else. Am I wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 05:24 PM
3

Well, it's not just being religious. I can handle it if they are religious but pretty chill about it. But if they make religiousness their identity...they won't work with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 06:14 PM
10

Haha yeah. Also if their profile says "faith is really important to me" or "Jesus comes first" etc. Hard pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 06:10 PM
1

No one is losing. That only makes sense if you assume it is a zero sum game. It's not. We are just doing better as a population now. Maybe some men will lose out. But men in general will be getting higher quality women. And women will be able to make themselves higher status. Win win for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 08:45 PM
1

Yes.. absolutely. I love women for their personalities and banter the fun times I've had with them. I love to see them grow as people and learn and be happy. Everything I love about my Bros I love about my girlfriends and girlbros.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 06:19 PM
4

Plus, hot guy was first, average guy was.... SECOND Just because they were second doesn't mean they are the second choice. It could be that they met later in life. I've dated several people, and I definitely dont see the later women as being a poorer choice. On the contrary, I had refined what I wanted and they generally got closer to what I was looking for as I went. It's possible in some scenarios that a woman is using the second guy as a backup. But that certainly isn't the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 06:01 PM
1

Well, that isnt really a good example of top women screwing everyone else. The industry screwed those women by changing the rules. Yes, it might be because of that incident. But the owners of OF could have decided it was a fluke and ate the charge backs. Or they could apply those rules only to celebrities. Or make different rules that take into account cash flow (for example, you can only cash out 100k / week without prior notice,) or if your account generates insane amounts of returns, then it …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 03:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter