TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

just_a_label Archive

View 2 posts and 51 comments by just_a_label on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The only people that would argue about it are those that are looking to be offended for illogical reasons. So the people mra's regularly argue against, i.e. feminists or people brainwashed by feminism. Just saying, using qualifiers has made my debates go much easier.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:49 PM
1

It seems like the problem might be your lack of qualifiers. Statements like "On average, men are stronger than women" are undeniably true, therefore not likely to be misconstrued or cause unnecessary and distracting debates.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:31 PM
9

Little girls don't get told in church they are damned and going to hell for wearing pants. In some churches they do. At least in the Southern US. Don't take that the wrong way I support men's rights, but I am getting tired of seeing comparisons that are not necessarily true.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:06 PM
5

It's the statement by the Judge that is wrong If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:50 AM
1

In the US {age of consent laws](http://www.ageofconsent.us/) vary by state.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:27 PM
1

Except some of us are vegetarians for completely unrelated reasons: political philosophy (involuntary relationships between animals are wrong, a philosophy that predates feminism), concern for the environment, health benefits, just to name a few.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:47 PM
3

Compare to healthcare. Why are we discussing health insurance costing more to women? Statistically women spend much more on health care than men. It makes perfect business sense to charge women more for health insurance, yet at least in the US, this is a major political discussion.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:58 PM
1

In my life, I call a woman out when she says things like that. Just as I expect her to call me out on my bullshit...if we are friends it should help our friendship to get over our prejudices and if not then I don't care.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:34 AM
3

Yeah I have 4 "best" friends, 3 of them are women. Never once have I thought two of them as anything but a friend. The other one, well it was reciprocated until it wasn't but we worked that out. I had this conversation with my roommate last night though, that not all men are about sex all the time...she has mainly male friends, so you think she would realize this but still...aghhh frustrated.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 11:01 PM
7

It bothers me because she denies that "good guys" exist. I could care less about friendzoned, if someone is too scared to show their feelings (I have been there and it sucks and I have learned my mistake) then how is the girl suppose to know. Of course my girl friends say this, but then in the next sentence they say they are always afraid straight men have ulterior motives. Sometimes, it's not about sex we just find you to be an interesting person that we want as a friend...At least I think that…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:42 PM
3

Low self-esteem This is often caused by the abuse, particularly when it's non-physical abuse.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:19 PM
4

From the comments A woman who spends her money on a man is a fool! If he is in between jobs, he's not good for dating. If he doesn't have a place to stay, then help him find a shopping cart to put his things in, but don't let him stay with you. Why fool with someone who doesn't have nothing? Way to be the guy this article was written about.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:24 AM
1

I try to be nice and follow my own rules, it leads to some sticky situations but if a person is overly sensitive or intolerant I probably won't be hanging out with them.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:27 PM
2

If you are in the group, you can use the derogatory terms, but if you are an outsider than you can't. I disagree with this but that's what the standard is. I just try to avoid derogatory terms because even if you are in the in-group, some people still take offense to it. Our society is idiotic.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:12 PM
2

I had an accident prone childhood...sometimes I am amazed I'm still living.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:33 PM
2

For trans, just go with trans or trans, it's the all inclusive terms and you never have to worry about anything else. But tranny has always been an offensive term so try to avoid that one.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:01 PM
2

Yeah I have broken both toes and an arm as well as some other bones, but ribs hurt the worse.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:57 PM
3

I never said hey let's oppress trannies and force them to wash our dishes and darn our socks! I know you are speaking out of character here, but you wouldn't (or I imagine you wouldn't) drop derogatory terms for other groups so why drop the equivalent for trans* so casually? On a related note, you can possibly argue that surgery cannot change biological sex, which is more complicated than just XX or XY, because it has not changed the genetics of a person. Gender, on the other hand, is defined ba…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:13 AM
1

Country, it's as traditional in morals as culture comes, at least for men.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:35 AM
1

So men and women should, on average, be paid equal for each day of work, regardless of experience, hours, and occupation....okay, how about we take that a step further and say "everyone earns the exact same regardless of experience, hours, and occupation." Any criticisms? I know the above is sort of a straw man argument but if society makes it so people are equal in outcome, is it not the logical solution?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:14 AM
1

Hearing this for the first time was my red pill.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:51 AM
2

while running barefoot but yes on concrete
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:58 AM
10

Well actually I ran an entire season of cross country with that broken toe, placed in States as well. I didn't beg for sympathy but I find it ridiculous that if I would show that running on a broken toe hurt someone would tell me to "man up." I don't think OP is saying he whined about it days later, he wanted to show pain in the moment but was told to "man up"
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:55 PM
5

I broke my big toe stubbing it. So yes OP might need help because of a stubbed toe.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:28 PM
1

You call it a thought experiment, but come form of anarchy has existed albeit on a limited scale. Ancient Ireland had a system where groups formed and broke alliances, but never was their word binding even to their own citizens. The point is that anarchy like that was stable for 800 years, it even resisted invasion because there was no central authority to conquer. Ireland was even just as advanced as every other part of Europe at that time. The important part is that no one's rule were superior…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:23 AM
1

And if memberships requires fees, then you've really got a government. Then it is logically impossible to have anarchy, for even in anarcho-communism people still expect labor to be paid into the system. But government is more than than paying fees and following the rules, government is an organization that claims the right to force and that everyone must be a part of the system, whether it collects fees or not is irrelevant. This is why Somalia is not anarchic. Each organization claims that no …
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:11 AM
1

I have to step in here with the whole Somalia thing. Somalia is not anarchic, nor was it ever. It was a civil war where all sides lost but continued to try to set up their government. So the war didn't stop, no single government could gain control but a bunch of groups were trying. Eventually they did set up a government, but the people of Somalia reject central authority so much that the government has no real way of enforcing it's laws. But true anarchic societies have existed; Ancient Ireland…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:07 AM
1

my best guess I was guessing from my experience with "church camps". I was not trying to say "all churches teach outdated traditions". I was trying to point out to you that you don't really know what the camp is teaching either, so saying that men should learn "character" like the camp wants doesn't mean anything. But as a Baptist church in the western part of South Carolina, I think it was an educated guess. I may be completely wrong since it was just a guess.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:39 AM
2

I'm going to keep being a vegetarian and a man...soy kind of sucks though and I hardly ever eat it.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:58 PM
4

Yeah it rubs me wrong to. Especially since Axe is targeted towards teenagers who might get the wrong ideas about what a relationship should be. Hopefully if they date a girl like that they will come to regret it fairly quickly.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:38 PM
3

Respect fine, people should be respectful. Character? What character character-noun moral or ethical quality: a man of fine, honorable character. qualities of honesty, courage, or the like; integrity What morals and ethics is this camp teaching? It's church run so my best guess would be traditional Knight in Shining Armor stuff, sacrifice your life for the greater cause, women need protecting so sacrifice you life for them, do not express yourself outside of the norm because people/God might jud…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:30 PM
10

Just never date a girl like that...ever
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:23 PM
1

But if they use birth control they can't keep having kids so they can stay on welfare. Gees, don't you know anything about gaming the system? The dude is definitely at fault here to. Wear a damn condom or get a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:16 AM
3

The cannibalism thing was a bit too much, but it is fiction. Other than that and the whole god thing, the stuff about communal living, growing closer, love, nonviolence,and living life not fearing death I'm totally in. I could do without the communal marriage as well but that's irrelevant to me.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:03 AM
1

There this newfangled invention, I think it's call a "condom". They even make these "condoms" for both men and women.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:50 AM
3

Did you just read "Stranger in a Strange Land"? Because that is the exact philosophy it espouses towards clothing.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:29 AM
1

You seem to be ignoring my actual argument that socioeconomic status and major hurdles overcome in your life should be the factor we are judging people on. We shouldn't be assuming that because you are black, you had some major obstacle because that is not the case for every black person. Just like some white people face discrimination due to many factors in their life. At some point playing favoritism based on race needs to be re-evaluated. We have a black president, so obviously the majority o…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 02:50 AM
1

Just because we are pictured as redneck hicks, doesn't mean we are racist sexist bigots. Really? I know some areas of WV are extremely racist, but most areas and most people either do not encounter minorities enough to care or simply don't care. Especially, in my age group. Now sexual orientation, that still kicks up a fuss around there. And I pointed out someone of similar socioeconomic and geographic conditions but black who graduated college with the same degree as me and has a job paying sim…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:35 PM
1

oops... that's not what I meant.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:20 PM
2

Probably not that much different. The baby boomer generation in my area is racist, but very few of my parent's generation are racists. And essentially no one my age in my area was racist. So throughout school race would be of little importance, especially with the current laws like no child left behind which basically would have mandated that any blacks in mainly white schools have to achieve excellent scores or the school suffer major repercussion. It also helps that there are so few black fami…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:58 PM
3

I believe in equality, sort of. People are not equal nor is it possible for them to be. But we should give every respectful person respect as if they were an equal. I am also adamantly against the laws be written in a way to give advantage to the "oppressed". The laws should be blind of gender, race, etc.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:15 PM
2

Okay I think I get it. Something still seems off to me, but I haven't slept in a few days so it could just be my brain protesting.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:10 PM
8

Because of every point DocSeuss_Needs_A_Good_Day said in the comments. Not about his handicap, but about the expectations of being a white male, when in truth socioeconomic status is a better indicator of how difficult your life will be. You expected to excel even when other groups have major advantages. My college the average SAT score was 1310 for Caucasians, but only 1090 for blacks. Within my major the average SAT score was 1420 for males but only 1300 for females. Yes my major is a male dom…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:07 PM
3

For some reason I cannot parse that sentence correctly. Are you missing punctuation or is there a grammar error?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:25 PM
1

I don't want to measure the victims damage, well sort of but I'm some sort of anarchist (I'm not entirely sure what to call myself because I don't neatly fit into ideologies) and it would take hours to write down how I think criminals should be treated. But clearly a murder is more than possession charges, a violent rape is probably more severe than a murder. I don't want to do it on a case by case basis. I just want some semblance of common sense to be applied to sentencing for crimes. Not this…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:55 PM
1

Government at it's finest...can't wait for my anarchist utopia to be real :)
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:31 AM
10

Our whole justice system is messed up. Michael Jackson's murderer got 4 years, yet federal drug offences can get you 20 years. How does that make sense? Sentences need to be adjusted so that the severity of the crime matches the punishment.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:20 AM
1

Steal common household items versus wreak a truck and lambast him for everyone to see, seems....equal
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:53 PM
1

The point is not to fight that crazy, that is not what I meant by calling them out. It is impossible to fight bat shit crazy in any ideology. People should be called out so that outsiders know that crazy is not representative of the group. Unfortunately feminism as a whole has not been doing that, and it is hurting them as a group. Just as most christians decry the Westboro Baptist Church, feminism needs to ostracize the radfems. Then it will be seen as a egalitarian group.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:06 PM
5

It's a little bit extreme but it's not that most or /mr does hates feminists, we hate radfems like the one's who advocate genocide of basically all males. Since regular non man-hating feminist do not seem to call these people out, we think that feminism is a lost cause.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:40 PM
4

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 08:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter