TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

just_an_ordinary_guy Archive

View 0 posts and 238 comments by just_an_ordinary_guy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

My friends brother had a bachelor party where they went rafting on the New River and camped while drinking beer. That's my kind of bachelor party.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:23 PM
1

I guess some people don't want to face the truth. Chomsky talks often about anarcho-syndicalism. And Bernie Sanders definitely isn't a socialist, people. I'm torn between liking him for some progressive views and embracing the socialist name, but not liking him because he is co-opting the name to describe social democracy (capitalism light).
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:51 AM
5

I mean, the vast majority of women are fine with "normal" consent. You may be taking a risk, but the fact is that you'll probably be fine. However small the risk though, if you fall in that small percent where you do get burned, it could make your life miserable. No real advice other than don't write off women and get to know them pretty well before you do anything sexual. I don't have any real hard evidence, but a lot of these "rescinded consent after the fact" events generally seem to be casua…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:51 PM
2

I read that there still is something like a 3% wage gap when you account for everything you mentioned. That small wage gap is mostly due to men being more aggressive negotiators. I don't know how you guys feel about unions and collective bargaining, but that is one solution to close the rest of the wage gap. Women at my job (while there are only a few in my male dominated job) make the exact same hourly wage as the men do for the exact same job.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:47 PM
5

And salary negotiations should be mentioned too. There is evidence that men are typically more aggressive on salary negotiations, which is the largest portion of the wage difference once you account for hours worked in the exact same job.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:32 PM
2

A lot of people in other branches just don't know what we do/did. Sure, I did 6-7 month deployments every 15 months on a submarine, but over half of my time not deployed was still spent at sea. 60 to 70 percent of a submariner's time is spent at sea. Then you gotta factor in 10 or more hours per day at work, while in port. And every third day is a 24 hour duty day (every fourth day if you're lucky). Navy life is hard and stressful. Sure, we don't get shot at often, but there are different kinds …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:56 PM
3

Actually, the child would be ~15.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:48 PM
1

But the photo was probably sent under the assumption that it was solely for the recipient's use, not to post for everyone else to see. I think that the sender should be pissed off if someone shows other people their nude photos when those photos were to remain private between just those two parties. Yes, there is no certainty and it is naive to think that those photos will remain private.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:41 PM
1

Genderqueer.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:57 AM
3

Keep in mind that out of those 45% of marriages ending in divorce, there are a lot of repeat offenders. There are also people who get married and never getting divorced. The ones who get remarried and redivorced help bring up the percentage.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:59 AM
1

People who see the white house petition thing as stupid and a waste of time. Seriously, the joke petitions get all of the attention. The real issues get some lame response where the president basically says "I'm not changing anything, and you just wouldn't fully understand the reasons why." The whole petition thing is a joke.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:29 PM
2

Nice meme.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:05 AM
1

It hasn't yet, but the few forms of marxism that have been implimented were based on specific interpretations. Leninism and Stalinism are the two main versions, that also influenced other communists. Many maxists don't necessarily subscribe to those ideologies. I'm not as well versed in it as I would like to be. The main thing I want to express is that Stalinism and Leninism aren't the only ways to marxism
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:57 PM
2

Look up bourgeoisie feminism. Feminism isn't necessarily a marxist cause if it is only benefitting the elite women. Like how much of this third wave feminism is doing.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:13 PM
6

No, it's 16'.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:57 AM
3

I can't fucking escape my mediocrity.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:54 AM
5

A gif wouldn't do justice. You really need to hear the slap.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:40 AM
2

All of the figurative sodomy.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:08 AM
1

I can think of dozens of other reasons that come before this one though. PAPERCLIP 4 LYFE
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:18 AM
3

I wouldn't say poor, but more in the realm of "median wage earner." It's not a lot, but for a single guy, it's far from poverty.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 07:53 AM
2

For the record, I wasn't trying to attack him in my previous comment. More of an observation. I do appreciate your comment though, and I definitely learn towards your way of thinking. However, the socialist community would be quick to call you out as a "brocialist" if you deviate from the common thought.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:45 PM
2

You say he's too right wing, citing feminism as one of the reasons. You say you very well could be a communist, yet denounce feminism. May I ask why? Pretty much every socialist and communist I have met has at least supported feminism in some way, even if they take issue with some of the rabid third wave feminism stuff.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:32 PM
1

"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion, and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids."
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:31 AM
3

As far as I understand, there are more common law jurisdictions where battery is the proper term, as assault is only the threat of violence. But yeah, it is a bit pedantic. I've seen it at least a dozen times over the past couple of days. Assault typically does accompany battery (when assault is considered just threats). And just assault in and of itself is a crime as well. I think the biggest reason that people point out that it is battery and not assault is because of what I already mentioned,…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:01 AM
1

One of the big reasons why I am a syndicalist is that sydicalism can function within a capitalistic structure. While I don't like capitalism, any change over to full socialism will probably be slow and in steps. Syndicalism would be one such step.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:34 AM
1

I'm not wholly sympathetic to all socialists either, though I don't mind them in the near term either. I am too against wholly centrally planned economies, though I do see a central government involvement in certain industries as being probably necessary (transportation infrastructure, things like the FAA, etc.). I'm more of a syndicalist. And FWIW to non-socialists, many socialists despise liberalism.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:01 AM
4

Didn't you know that a liberal welfare state is socialism you silly commie? /s But seriously, to add, socialism is all about taking charge of your well being and that of others. It absolutely has nothing to do with sitting back and being irresponsibly hands off. The proletariat are victims. They take more responsibility through socialism. Plus, socialism and egalitarianism go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:46 PM
1

Ah, I had forgotten about that case. Yeah, you have to tell them that you are going to remain silent. I think it's a bunch of bunk, but whatever.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 05:36 PM
0

Nope, never been arrested. I am aware that your silence can not be used against you though.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:22 AM
2

I'm not advocating for giving them any info for sure. What I'm saying is that he may be referring to having them there as observers instead of your bros. Before any escalation happens. Like "hey, I need to move stuff out of the house and my SO might try to start some shit. I don't want a fight to happen." I don't know if cops do stuff like that, and I really wouldn't want them there anyway. I would prefer to keep the cops out of my personal life as much as possible. It introduces too many variab…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:20 AM
3

Sure, constantly shouting "AM I BEING DETAINED?" at a traffic stop doesn't help, but if you're in handcuffs, why would you want to speak before lawyering up? Don't they also say that anything you say or do can be used against you? Either way, once you are in cuffs it's not like getting on their good side will save you a whole lot of time. They're not just going to magically un cuff you and say "whoops, our bad."
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:13 AM
4

I think he's referring to calling them before anything blows up, but you're fairly certain that it will. Not sure how well it would work out though. Cops generally seem to be indifferent unless something is actually happening.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:08 AM
3

He mentioned elsewhere that he had 15 guns in total, which really isn't a lot in the scope of collecting. The average is just under $1700 a gun, which really isn't all that expensive. It can add up fast.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:35 PM
1

What are you worried about? Well, I don't have an unhealthy worry about these things. However, I definitely am worried when traveling alone, talking back to someone bothering me, using an ATM, or walking alone at night. A drunk guy with an attitude, a robber with a gun, or some punk looking for a fight don't care if I'm some average looking dude. A weapon is a force multiplier and will give them confidence. A number of these things aren't the domain of women. But, it's buzzfeed, so no surprise.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:45 PM
-3

"White mens' rights movement."
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:15 AM
4

His mother only sought counseling. From what I read, she wasn't the one who wanted him arrested. It was the system that did.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:12 AM
7

Good luck with that. With the way juries are selected, you would be hard pressed to accomplish anything through jury nullification. They'll be able to smell you from a mile away, and I'm sure at least one person on the jury would report you for talking about it. Then you'll be in deep shit.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:11 AM
3

While I definitely hear more from the South, Pennsylvania isn't immune from this shit.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:09 AM
7

And if they would have done their job right, they would probably have identified that this kid had issues stemming from his rape, and he could have received proper help. It's just one more example of the US justice system. It's all about vengeance and punishment and has nothing to do with rehabilitation.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:08 AM
5

I can understand where that idea came from. It's definitely no secret that women were oppressed far more at one point, and I can understand certain arguments for it today in certain situations. But the fact remains that it's mostly not true anymore. To me, the whole mens' rights movement is about "yes, women were oppressed, still may not be equal in certain respects, but men definitely don't have it better overall either."
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:04 AM
1

It just meets all of the right topics for bullshit. Circumcision drama plus feminist drama.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:08 PM
1

I think I already responded up a bit, but this looks like California's penal code. I would have to check other penal codes to see if they offer the same protection.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:04 AM
1

This looks like it is for California. I'll have to spot check some other states to see if they have the same protections.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:59 PM
2

Mom jokes aren't usually my thing, but I couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:48 PM
3

Your mom would probably be pretty upset to hear that you're in jail.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:26 PM
0

It's very likely that you will get to use the phone. However, there is no specific right to use it.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:38 AM
-1

Sure, it may be their MO to give you a chance to make a call. However, you have no right to use the phone. In the US, the 6th amendment gives you the right to counsel, among other things. I'm unsure if there are any other laws not covered under the constitution that give you a "right to one phone call."
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:36 AM
2

I'm pretty sure the one phone call thing is a myth. The cops don't have to let you use the phone.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:24 AM
10

Mom: Carries you for nine months. Divorces dad later on down the road and continually fawns over a multitude of boyfriends while practically neglecting you and your siblings. But she's your mother. Dad: Actually pays for stuff you need and tries to help with homework, even though he works a ton and never took Algebra. I really hate the "gave birth to you" argument. I really doesn't mean anything. Fuck guys because we biologically can't give birth to a child. The dad, quite often, has to deal wit…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:47 AM
1

You keep grouping us all together. I want nothing to do with the Democratic party. They aren't leftists. They're Republican lite. I'm done having this debate with you. It's basically become a "you, no you" match. I don't need to justify myself to you.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:29 AM
1

You know, there are other issues that are equally or more important. I am a leftist because I believe in worker's rights. That's one of the big reasons. But, you make a good point. I guess I should change my political view point based on something that is comparatively unimportant.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 12:23 AM
3

The left is only the Democratic party? Is that what you're saying?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:11 AM
3

Being a leftist does not mean that we fall into the Democratic party. There is more to it than traditional American politics would have you believe.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:31 AM
5

One idea under the left libertarian umbrella is libertarian socialism. It's really just another and less radical sounding name for anarcho-syndicalism. Source: I am one. It really has little in common with what most people are familiar with when the hear libertarian.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:27 AM
3

There is a decent amount of hate for MRAs, whether it is by use of satire or flat out hatred. It's been slowly gaining traction in the mainstream circuits, though I would say it has just recently broached out of the SJW type avenues. The first mainstream "hate" against MRAs that comes to mind is that skit with Lena Dunham on SNL. The shooting by Elliot Rodger in California brought it to the attention of many once again.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:00 PM
3

A number of women are emotional and irrational, but then again, so are a lot of men that I've met. It's not that they're exactly wrong on that point. It's just that they completely ignore that a lot of people in general can be emotional and irrational. Cherry-picking, like you said.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:56 PM
1

My first reaction was "why should anyone have to prove to someone else that they're together in a relationship?" However, this would have definitely resolved the situation for all but the most irrational of person. A quick, "hey, here we are together on her birthday" or something would work. We shouldn't have to, but I hate dealing with people and would rather have them get away from me.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:11 AM
7

Arooga's is shit anyway. If I wanted to watch sports while eating an average meal, I would just cook it at home. This is just the same pandering that many other brands use. I've pretty much tuned out all of the "moms smart, dad's are basically big kids." Arooga's is one of those "lowest common denominator" restaurants common in casual dining restaurants. One other thing to consider is it is a sport's bar, and the clientele are typically more male. It doesn't excuse their actions, but it does giv…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:29 PM
1

The first thing I thought of was that it's kind of a hassle to tote around a kid, so it's a lot easier to park right by the door. If anything, it would be somewhat of a reinforcement of a gender role that the mother only takes care of the children. Regardless, a gender neutral word would be ideal.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:25 AM
1

You can't edit the title of your post, but you can edit the field of text same as any other reddit comment.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:58 AM
2

It's not necessarily about lowering someone's standards. The people who will achieve more will still achieve more. It's not like their personality will change, and there will still be people growing up and having the will and ability to achieve a lot. I would rather have the people who are only doing it for a check to do what makes them happy, making room for people who actually care.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:01 PM
2

God damn, you're so fucking negative. What is not positive about telling people that it's ok if you take more time off of work for your family or whatever? Sure, the outcome might be the same (guys seeking a different career or life goal). However, it's definitely better than "hey guys, you can be lazy and still get women too!" What we're talking about is a hypothetical change of societal mindset. Are you just bitter that some guys might actually change what they do? That instead of seeking out …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:34 AM
2

No. You got it wrong. I didn't suggest that. I was merely attempting to reword it so that you might be able to understand what they were stating. I think that everyone should be encouraged to do their absolute best. I think people should be encouraged to pursue a job of their choice, but know when to settle for something less. Also, that they should spend time with their families. To have a good work/family balance. You can accomplish the same thing with positive wording insyead of negative word…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:37 AM
3

I didn't get that implication. The idea is that men should be encouraged to work less hours, or in less stressful jobs, thus making less money, if that is what they desire. Now, some guys (and girls) work more hours, in higher stress jobs, thus making more money because they want to. They enjoy that kind of work atmosphere. Not everyone does, but some people do it out of necessity because they are pressured into it. Society pressures people into it. It is often a social stigma if the woman is th…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:38 AM
1

And what I am trying to convey is that I will never understand why you would find it fun. It is beyond my ability to understand why someone would find it fun because I find it repulsive. Let me explain something. Some people play rugby. If you know anything about rugby, you know that it's nearly impossible to play without acquiring some sort of injury. However, it is a team sport, and has all of the fun associated with it. Competition, camaraderie, etc are parts of it. However, the nut tapping g…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:34 AM
2

I'm aware of that, but I can never understand why they find it fun.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:47 AM
13

I always hated this game. Who would really want to inflict that pain on others just for sport? Also, who would willingly play along with that game just to get a chance to hit another person in the nuts? Bunch of sadomasochists.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:32 AM
3

As a blue collar worker my self, I can echo this. Now, I'm sure there are places where they will get sexually harassed, but those are largely going away with former generations and companies that face lawsuits. The current generation (more so than others) values what you can do over your gender. If you can do your job, no one cares what gender you are. You are equally derided if you are lazy.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:30 AM
3

My biggest fear if I had a SO that abused me would be the obvious. I would be afraid of retaliating, even in a purely defensive manner to get away. Go straight to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Either that, or false abuse claims. Possibly the same outcome, depending on the officer.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:41 AM
2

There is a difference between not agreeing with someone's lifestyle, and not being tolerant. And as far as bullying goes, sure I'll buy it. Lots of social animals do it. However, the adults step in when shit gets out of hand.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:47 PM
1

None of my girlfriends' dads ever needed to intimidate me. The whole concept is a bit stupid. If you feel that you need to intimidate a date or boyfriend to keep them from harming your daughter, maybe you need to impress upon your daughter the reality of choosing a better person to date. Also, the idea of having to intimidate someone not to harm their daughter kind of follows the same line of thought as "teach boys not to rape."
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:38 PM
1

It seems that they interpreted the law to not apply in that case, and they're working on fixing that. It seems wrong, but it's legalese.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:18 AM
6

Ah, I wasn't aware of that. It appears that AOL took over in 2011, which coincides pretty well with when I stopped visiting that site due to its garbage. I stopped using it in late 2011 or early 2012.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:16 PM
12

I used use the Huffington post as one of my sources for news. Over the past couple years, I've noticed that almost all news is gone. It's mostly just editorials and opinion pieces. I know it had a lot of those before, but now they are overwhelmingly the majority.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:26 PM
1

Not everyone was aware of that risk when they signed up, and not everyone is willing to throw away their life to fix it. I wish they could, but that's a lot to ask of any single individual. If only they would band together and bring everything to light as a group. They might have some more protection in numbers.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 08:28 PM
2

I'm not saying I like it. It's just that I can understand why they are hesitant to speak up. Doing so can ruin their lives and careers.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:38 PM
5

It's not the same thing though. He was pepper sprayed and dogpiled. They used quite a bit of force.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:31 PM
9

That's what you inferred. The title just says "Responding police kill father." Nowhere was a gun mentioned.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:29 PM
6

Have you heard of what happens to the few who do speak out? One example is that police officer in NYC. They broke into his house and threw him in a psych ward.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:21 PM
58

Exactly what I wanted to say. Nair Rodriguez accuses officers of brutality. Police say they were following protocol and used no undue force. Undue force by the police is another person's brutality. Plus, imagine what is going through this man's head at the time. He did absolutely nothing wrong, and he gets attacked. That would surely escalate things into a fight or flight mindset. When did the police stop talking to people first?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:19 PM
1

Does it fuzz what you see on RES? I thought the comment votes you see on RES were real and fuzzing was only on thread votes.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:42 AM
3

Right. It's mainly a semantics thing. It's still technically a burden, it's just whether they see it in a positive or negative way.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:21 AM
7

Eh. You can willfully take on a burden and succeed. A burden doesn't have to be completely negative. Yeah, babies cost a shit ton of money and are a financial burden, but if you can have the finances to take care of one. You lose time. You lose sleep. They're all going to be burdens.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:35 AM
5

It's one of the main tenets of /r/theredpill, but you probably knew that already.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:32 AM
1

With RES you can see the number of upvotes, even when it has negative points.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:31 AM
6

If I ran over something as big as a kid, I would stop and check for vehicle damage and look at what I ran over. I've run over some big rocks and branches before.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:42 AM
3

But why would having a prior record factor into this? I could understand if he had prior DUIs and was being brought up on charges of vehicular manslaughter while DWI. It shows a history. However, if his criminal record is irrelevant to the case at hand, why would it matter? I'm not saying that's what you're saying. More a thought to bring up discussion.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:41 AM
-11

Come on guys. This isn't helping our cause one bit. It just proves what they say. Edit: ah yes, let the hate flow through you. You're only bolstering their accusations that MRAs are bitter. So much for being the better person. The fact that I'm being downvote while they're being upvoted is uncalled for. And no, using "cunt" doesn't automatically make you a misogynist, but the context you use it in determines it's meaning. It does prove that, at the very least, you are a tactless prick. This shit…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:38 AM
1

King George VI, Queen Elizabeth's father. However, the British royal family has had very limited power for quite some time. The UK is a constitutional monarchy IIRC.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:09 PM
10

You would be featured on tumblr. Also, keep your identity secret if you do. I wouldnt put it past some to try and doxx you and assassinate your character.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:32 AM
2

I continue to believe that voting for someone who most closely represents what you want is better than not voting, even if they're a long shot. I will continue to vote third party, even if it is entirely meaningless.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:26 AM
24

Something something pcmasterrace joke. But seriously, when are they going to start focusing on the equal part. While there may be a wage gap, when the playing field is perfectly level, the gap is very small to non existent.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:17 AM
1

Dammit, I was trying to be right, but went wrong. I'll have to google next time.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:57 AM
9

Oh, I know. I didn't mean to infer that. It's typically "extremists" or those who are ignorant of either cause who confuse it. Too be quite honest, and I am sure I am not the only one, I don't call myself a MRA. I call myself an egalitarian or a humanist.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:08 AM
20

And that's a thing that frustrates me. Who should care? Shouldn't we be left to make decisions based on our personal wants? The woman may have a more promising career that banks more money, or maybe the guy wants to stay at home and raise his kids. Vice versa as well. It may look like the woman is taking on traditional gender roles (which she is), but the thought process to come to their decision may have been rooted in something completely benign. Like, "he makes more money anyway, and I like t…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:47 PM
7

I agree. There are women who can do it, so let them. There are guys who can't do it, and they don't get that chance. Either lower the standards over all (bad choice) or keep everyone on the same playing field. The requirements aren't so strict that they are unattainable. For the navy, allowing women into combat roles is a bit easier. The navy is definitely a more mental and dexterous force, as many of the sailors perform tasks to keep a ship at sea and don't need to carry 80+ pounds of gear.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:16 AM
3

They're not all that bad though, especially if there is a healthy mix of the points. One, or even a few of these doesn't necessarily make it an abusive relationship. However, they could definitely be markers.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:35 AM
5

Insulting you may not be abuse, but if it is a common theme in a relationship, it can be verbal/mental abuse. That's often how things may start before they escalate to physical violence, though it doesn't necessarily mean that is will. Some people are just assholes.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:33 AM
7

I don't think it would cause any problems with the egalitarian feminist groups. However, some of the more "extremist" and tumblr type groups may get offended that the article says women can be abusive as well. Kind of along the mindset that "women can't rape" or "men can't be raped."
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:31 AM
2

For pushups, I used to be a fat guy with no exercise before the military, and I could do 25 in two minutes. I wouldn't use the term "bang out," but it's doable. As far as pull ups, I could do exactly zero. I got out a couple years ago, and haven't really maintained any exercise routine, and I could still do 5, probably. Not sure what I could do at the peak of my military routine, because we were never tested on it.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:25 AM
6

While the training disparity doesn't seem the same, there definitely seemed to be a difference when we were being "ITed" at Great Mistakes. Funny part was when some of the guys would be whining and crying, and some of the women recruits would tell them to stop being pussies. One thing I noticed in Navy basic was the type of person involved. There was very little middle ground. The women seemed to be gung ho or not there at all. I guess, as far as egalitarianism went in basic, both male and femal…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:18 AM
3

This would be a good starting point if you are interested in the subject.
/r/becomeaman30/12/13 09:23 PM
15

They do, and they do. It's perfectly acceptable for a fat woman to only want a stud, but as soon as a guy wants a skinny hot girl, they get shamed for being shallow.
/r/MGTOW29/12/13 02:48 AM
10

I couldn't imagine if my father didn't have custody of my siblings and I. My mother just wanted out of the relationship. They split custody 50/50, and I don't think it was ever in question otherwise. Looking back as a 26 year old, my father was certainly the better parent, by far. My mother was always caught up in the latest guy, and when in a relationship they always bought tons of shit for themselves and went horribly into debt. My mother often dated douchebags, who ended up living with us. We…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:59 PM
1

Alas, the problem of the SJW, and they're blind to it.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:22 PM
1

Thanks! I'm actually quite more than an ordinary guy. I'm just good at hiding it I guess. The name came from the fact that I feel that I have been quite average for my whole life, but I only realized in the past couple years that my peer group is a bit above average. As for the joke, I was making a joke about how edtv and the truman show are similar. I never really understood penis jokes, though my type of humor tends to be more highbrow. I see the hypocrisy in the joke. I think anything should …
/r/MensRights22/12/13 11:48 PM
2

It was a joke, but thanks. Edtv is often joked as being the crappier "The Truman Show." Plus, they came out around the same time.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:06 PM
1

Ah, yeah. I know What you mean there too.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:04 PM
1

Was that the one with Jim Carry?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:30 PM
3

Only because she was a fanatical, mentally ill kind of person. She wasn't portrayed as "normal."
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:29 PM
3

I found it meh too, but the character was portrayed as a deadbeat kind of guy. They weren't saying all guys were like that, but we all know they exist.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:28 PM
0

Yeah. She could not be a feminist and believe in typical gender roles. The video isn't making it clear which side she is on. It would only be hypocritical if she was a feminist. Her views make sense from a non-feminist train of thought.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:14 PM
1

It's generally easy to understand that it is just a baseless attack, because the person uttering it is often seething with anger. You can't have a descent conversation with anyone who is angry.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:13 PM
2

Oh, I know. Someone not familiar with it might think it is an actual challenge to be introspective, when it isn't.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:05 AM
2

I think it is clearly satire, but I've been wrong before.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:40 AM
1

Yes, and ripping holes in space time.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:38 AM
9

Social justice warrior. They are often misguided white Knights, tumblrinas, and the such. They spout shit like "check your privilege," not as a serious challenge to be introspective, but as an ad hominem attack.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:37 AM
1

That stood out to me too, and I'm not surprised that it's the top comment. I have nothing further to add because you all hit all of my points.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:35 AM
8

Since it was more than kissing a helmet. Still shouldn't be sexual assault though. That term should be reserved for real sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:01 AM
1

I'm surprised that they got this close to the police without being knocked down first.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:00 AM
8

That would only work if they also have an open cut on their lips. HIV doesn't last very long outside of the body. And even then, it's highly improbable.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:58 AM
5

I don't know any place that would be ok with his hugging like that, at that age. It may be the way he was brought up, but short of a mental handicap, he should be able to learn that this isn't a social norm well before high school.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:31 AM
1

Now, I don't think she would be out of line to kill him while he is in the act of beating on her. I mean, it would be the same as any other self defense case. However, one should always take the course with the least amount of violence necessary to get out of a violent situation.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:25 AM
1

You haven't met an Italian or Latina housewife. They won't take any shit. The fights are definitely even, if the people I know are any example. Then they have crazy sex afterwards. Or so a few of my friends say.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:21 AM
5

Hell, the military teaches you that it is your duty to escape and help others to escape, according to the Code of the U.S fighting force, which is an ethical code. It doesn't supersede the Geneva convention. It doesn't have any mention of killing or not killing captors.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:17 AM
1

such truth many upsets very cats long live doge
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:41 AM
1

You see, I kind of understand where the term "mansplaning" may have originated, and it doesn't just happen to women. Have you ever had a co-worker who thinks they know it all? They may have condescendingly told you that what you were doing is incorrect, when there may be a couple ways to reach the same result. This is what I think of. However, it has come to mean "anything a man says that tells me that I am wrong" is mansplaning. The guy may totally be right. He may not even be doing it in a con…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:39 AM
2

Oh, they definitely do. One of my brother's friends used this shit on me before. She legitimately doesn't think men have any real world problems. Meanwhile, my brother got 50% custody of his two kids only because his ex-wife had a record of problems with the police, and he got a really good lawyer, paid for by my mother. He kind of ignores his friends shit it seems, only because they have other redeeming qualities, and she is the long time girlfriend of one of his good friends.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:39 PM
44

Or maybe George Lucas is a terrible writer.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:48 AM
9

I agree. There are certain privileges that come with being a man. I also agree with the fact that men aren't the only ones with any sort of privilege. The bickering is just undermining the real issue, and that is the wealthy hegemony that exists in the western world, if not the entire world.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:50 PM
3

Only one PC reference and they were on garbage laptops. These guys aren't real gamers or nerds.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:11 PM
3

I was fortunate to have a dad that was a bit better than the typical "hands off dad." He taught me work ethic and working with my hands just through lead by example. Unfortunately, he never taught me anything about making friends or getting with women, because he himself doesn't fucking know. I'm still kind of a beta loser, but everything I do know I've pretty much taught myself or learned from watching other guys who succeed. I don't hate my dad though. I learned more than some of my peers. I f…
/r/becomeaman13/11/13 10:57 PM
1

They don't understand how much responsibility most of us have. It's quite the burden, but I wouldn't take it if I couldn't handle it.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 07:45 PM
32

A lot of people, especially those on the rad-feminist side of things, definitely have a hard time accepting responsibility for anything. It makes my blood fucking boil.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 10:37 AM
1

Wait, is this satire?
/r/MensRights08/11/13 11:35 PM
2

But I've been told multiple times to stop setting up straw feminists. These must all e made out of straw too.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:32 PM
3

I was just saying this not more than 24 hours ago. I see it every day too, but fortunately it does get downvoted. I'm not typically very vocal over here because I'm terrible at debating, but I like to keep up on the issues.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:51 PM
1

Ah nice. Glad we could clear that up!
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:30 PM
1

I know that, I thought you were still referring to spanx.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:51 PM
1

I'm legitimately curious. How do they relate to medicine?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:38 PM
1

I was going on the STEM route, but I can agree with you on the women's empowerment thing.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:52 PM
14

I would argue that Marie Curie was pretty damn important. Sure, sure, she worked in conjunction with her husband, but she did a lot on her own too. Let's not turn this into an anti-woman thing. It doesn't help the mens' rights movement.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:06 PM
4

That's how I see it. It's probably best to just leave it as it was, or just go without people period. I kind of like the minimalist banner. EDIT: After going to the post, and reading the reply from the /r/science mod, I think they should go back to what he designed. It was really well thought out and he was actually trying to preemptively avoid that kind of crap, but apparently not enough to not upset some feminists.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:04 PM
2

God damn autocorrect. I'm leaving it.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:36 PM
2

Maybe a difference in State laws. Maybe my parents and their lawyers thought it would be beneficial. I'll have to ask them.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:59 PM
2

Ah, I totally misinterpreted what you wrote. I'm sorry! I thought you might have been saying that he would be shitting on human rights just for the hypothetical, but I read it again. I'm sorry. I'll make sure to read better the next time!
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:01 PM
6

I didn't get that from his post. I think he just meant the same thing that I typed. It's not that people would disagree with the message, but the language might offend them to the point that they might miss the message completely and think "those MRAs are giant pricks." Women don't like being called a bitch, much less a cunt. In my experience, they really don't like those words even when directed at a different person.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:48 PM
14

It's more of a putting yourself in someone else's shows type of thing. How would you sway people to your side with language and attacks like that? There are better ways to express your views without calling someone a bitch and cunt.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:38 PM
5

I was ten when my parents got divorced, and the lawyers talked to me because I was old enough. My brother and sister weren't old enough. They went with 50/50 custody, because that's what I wanted, and it's what both of my parents wanted.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:36 PM
9

I wonder how some women think about this. They aren't strong enough to consent to sex? That's gotta piss off a lot of women.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:17 PM
0

I can't disagree with that. That is true. The women are typically more likely to avoid a guy one of her friends said is creepy than a guy would for a girl his friend said is crazy. Most guys I know will take someone's word for it, but still want to find out themselves.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 08:49 PM
0

No need to be a prick about it. There are more people in this sub that give snarky fucking responses than not. I seriously like some of the stuff posted here, but shit like this is unnecessary. Lose the fucking attitude and your response would be better. I could be reading it wrong, but just some of the word choices led me to this. Also, you're observations are not the norm in my world. Does that mean my experience and judgement are sorely lacking? Maybe I just don't surround myself with "typica…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 07:08 AM
0

I don't know about that. I have met legitimately crazy men and women, and I don't really think a larger number of either gender was represented. Maybe it is the way it manifests itself? Maybe that's just an exaggeration. I don't have the data. Only anecdotes. What I am saying is that both genders use a scapegoat, especially if they really don't want to go into further explanation. It's often covering up something that they may have done that they don't want their friends finding out about becaus…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 03:51 AM
-3

I see it as the same as when a guy says some girl is crazy. Are there crazy women out there? Sure. Most of the time it is a guy who was possibly broken up with, or had some embarrassing event that he doesn't want to talk about. Saying "she was crazy" is just easier and no one really asks for an explanation. Same with "he was creepy."
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 06:06 AM
2

Shit, that was redefined years ago. I was that guy in high school. Since I was the quiet, nerdy guy, some girls thought I was creepy. I was told this by a friend who's girlfriend didn't like to be around me.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 06:00 AM
3

What a total twat. A man who even thinks it is funny! No one, not even the worst of the worst, deserve vigilante justice at the expense of their penis. And it is never funny. Imagine if it was someone's finger or hand or whatever. Completely gender neutral. People would view the offender as a psychopath. But not a dick apparently...
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:09 AM
1

I just hope you don't place all of your blame on your parents. I feel the same way you do, but it was a product of a different time. They made the choice, but it was probably due to the medical staff. The best we can do is not dwell on the past, and push for parental and medical education.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:04 AM
8

Wouldn't be the first time a mother despises her child and does twisted shit.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:01 AM
3

It's a lot better in a lot of places than it was even 5 years ago. I know, because my brother easily kept partial custody of his kids, even though his wife (now ex) screamed "abuse" and such. My brother never abused her or the kids. The courts are definitely realizing that mothers can be shitty parents too.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:00 AM
1

Also a good point.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:10 AM
6

One thing that has always frustrated me with TRP is that I get the feeling that a lot of them think you can either be an alpha, and get women, or be a beta, and be a good provider. Is there no middle ground? I believe there is.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 12:17 AM
7

Wat? I missed that. I lurk a bit, but not that much (I spend more time over here). That's definitely extreme. However, I still stand by the other part of what I said.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:37 PM
5

Definitely wat. What about the matriarchal societies that exist/existed, like some Native American tribes? Did they eat meat because of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:26 PM
5

I've been lurking a lot both here and there for a bit. There are some overlapping views. Some of TRP moderates aren't all that bad, but some of the more extreme views can get a little sexist. But isn't that the case with a lot of movements?
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:54 PM
3

Yeah, the term "harsh reality" is pretty redundant. Most realities are somewhat harsh. I would take your statement and possibly expand upon that. Would you say that overprotective parents are less likely to have an honest relationship with their children?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 09:43 AM
4

She makes no sense. From her perspective, yes it is hard to not notice that everyone is skinny because she comes from a country with so many fat people. However, for them it's normal. I notice every single smart car on the street, but barely notice every sedan and pickup truck because of the same reasoning. She needs to get over her self. She also needs to check her privilege.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 09:10 AM
10

This leads to hamstering the likes of which must be seen to be believed, in the same class my Professor condemned the Mormon tradition of modesty while praising the Islamic tradition of veiling. Wut? I don't even... I haven't been to college yet, but I've been alive for 26 years and have seen some shit. I'm wondering if I should bother with some of these classes, just to get a look, or if it is more trouble than it is worth.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 09:06 AM
7

But that shit is delicious.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 09:03 AM
11

Careful, don't upset the HAES crowd if you want to live. As far as fat shaming goes, I believe that the reason it works well there is because of their culture. As far as I know, it is less of a thing to raise your children to believe that they are a special little snowflake. We have the Asian dad meme, and that's based on truth. Asian parents don't put blinders on their kids. They expose them to the harsh realities of life, unlike some western societies that shelter their children well into adul…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 09:00 AM
3

When are people going to learn that getting the police involved in non-violent disputes is always a bad idea. Not only does it waste resources and money, but you don't want to have possible power trippers with an itchy trigger finger at your house.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:55 AM
3

As the other guy said, I get the joke, but I'll expand. My dog is extremely affectionate. He was a two year old emaciated rescue that I got two years ago. I'm alpha enough to put him in his place, and dogs love that because they are stressed when they have to do the duty of being pack leader. However, there is a level of intimacy that one can't get from a dog. I'm talking about that emotional connection that you can only get from another human being that you can really only get from a life partn…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 03:35 AM
1

Yeah. I knew that prior to going there, but I like to pass through without getting gas. I don't like people fucking with my car. I'm more referring to the actual convenience store side of things having a drive through. I've seen a couple already.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:20 AM
3

I don't know about other countries, but in the USA we like everything on the go. Now we just need more drive through gas stations so I never have to leave my car seat.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:39 AM
3

I was going to make a remark very similar to this. Obviously the only reason a male adult would take a child into a private restroom is because he is a pedophile!
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:22 AM
7

What? They hassled men taking their children into a family restroom? Wtf.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:03 AM
2

Typically they are a single toilet. It's not like they are building a full bathroom. I don't think it's a fringe thing either. People with little kids can use these as well as assisting handicapped people. A place like Chuck E. Cheese would be somewhere that I would expect it to be used far more often than other places.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:57 AM
4

I couldn't have said it better. This is why you ask for forgiveness instead of asking permission.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:54 AM
8

I'm surprised more places don't have this. I don't know about women, but it's kind of awkward taking a four year old girl into the mens' bathroom. Granted, I'm just the uncle. I wonder if my brother finds it awkward.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:52 AM
13

But now the girls have the privilege of leaving campus for lunch. Who has more privilege now? Looks like the girls need to stop leaving campus so they can continue to have less privilege than the white cis male oppressors.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:36 PM
7

It's ok, the US is quickly becoming fascist anyway.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:32 PM
21

Wow. That's ELI5 material there. It just makes perfect sense to me.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 01:57 AM
2

But bringing up the time spent in jail isn't necessarily the right solution. Lowering time spent would possibly be more fair.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:48 PM
3

Seriously though, how can the government force a male birth control method? In a totalitarian system they could, but I don't think current western governments have a leg to stand on. Sure, they could try to force it, but you would see the population revolt. As far as selective service, that was brought about in a world where wars were fought by sheer numbers of people. It's a holdover from the past. Not really sure where I'm going in this argument though. Thoughts to words interface isn't workin…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 08:05 PM
3

What you are mentioning is only a part of what is known as eugenics. Hitler was a fan of eugenics. => You are literally Hitler. But seriously, how the fuck can this make sense to you? State control over reproduction? I'm sorry, I thought this was America.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:26 PM
1

Ah, ok. Well, seems OK then. I remember my brother bitching about it when his wife divorced him, but maybe that was because the kids were already getting it through their mom. Didn't help him much with split custody though.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:03 PM
0

But what about single fathers? Say the mother dies following childbirth or goes off the deep end and disappears? They might not qualify for food stamps but still be low income enough to qualify for WIC. Tough shit I guess... The program is focused on underprivileged children and unborn children of underprivileged women. Why shouldn't men be allowed to get it if they meet certain criteria?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:37 AM
4

Terrorists they be.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:22 AM
4

I live near here. This is the local news paper, and I assume OP lives in or around here too. My brother posted the link on his facebook page. I commented "If it was a woman looking for a lost dog, no one would think it is strange. It's a sad world we live in when men are streotyped just for being a man." One of his femenazi friends replies "WHITE MALES HAVE IT SO HARD ZOMG." I blows me away that people cannot see or ignore this fucking stereotyping.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:25 AM
3

Men can't be raped because all they think about is sex. /s
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:25 PM
2

I'm not a very active person here, but I lurk a lot and post if I have anything to add. I use a mix of real and false info too.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/13 07:54 AM
2

Exactly. I find it completely hypocritical.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 12:34 AM
8

I thought feminism was about choice. Jessica Biel made this choice. Now, I'm sure the feminists will cry "but the patriarchy made the choice for her." The fact is, a lot of professional women still legally change their name, but continue to use their maiden name as a stage name. Once again, if it's about choice, why does feminism seem to think there is only one way to do it? That is, in effect, removing the choice. It's no better than what the "patriarchy" chose for her.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 10:27 PM
1

I remember most of my male teachers. They were all great teachers. I remember fewer of my female teachers, and only the good ones. The rest were snarky as hell. Just because you're back in a high school doesn't mean you need to act like you are back in high school.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:42 PM
6

It does seem like it is for everyone else, but hey, she learned her lesson! /s
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:27 PM
29

Unfortunately, that defense is exactly opposite for women.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:25 PM
7

He "made" her cheat because he just wasn't there enough for her. He became boring after they married. This is the same logic my mom used when she cheated on my dad, followed by subsequent divorce.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 04:17 AM
4

I lost all respect when she quotes "Girls." And seriously, I would rather die alone and chaste than to put up with bullshit for my life.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 11:33 PM
6

Wouldn't surprise me. I'm not the greatest at judging age, plus some people age differently.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:38 PM
4

What an utter waste of money on something that you don't need. You could have put a very large down payment on a house for that money. But no, "I want to have kids when it suits me, not when it suits my body." Even carrying a baby a that age presents way more risk for the mother and the child. It's just irresponsible. I understand having kids later due to financial reasons, but I figured that was late 20s to early 30s. I have to question why she even wants kids.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 09:48 PM
9

Why the hell does she want to have children so late anyway? It's just bad planning.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 09:26 PM
19

I was wondering the same, but the look of disgust on the kids face at the end seems genuine. He doesn't look any older than 15.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:09 PM
1

This is true. It wasn't anyone that I gave a shit about anyway.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 06:16 AM
6

Yeah. And people think shy and weird is "introverted." You can be an extrovert and shy too. It's more than I care to explain. The internet is saturated with this shit, and now everyone thinks they are an introvert because shy and quirky is the in thing.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/13 09:11 AM
6

Eh, a lot might. However, I am an introvert that has been seen as socially awkward. If I appear that way, it is probably because I don't feel like making small talk. That shit is boring as Fuck.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/13 09:08 AM
24

Neurotic dog = poorly disciplined dog => Poorly disciplined person. Well behaved and submissive dog => This dog seems well trained => This person has the discipline to stick with something and do it right. They will do things that they don't like (like maintaining a neat living space) and not fucking whine about life sucking. This is just one example that I have observed. Your statement is incredibly true.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 06:46 AM
3

But what do you do when there aren't any reliable witnesses, and you get accused of violence when all you did was disarm your attacker? I know that things are starting to shift. My brother recently went through a custody dispute, and the lawyer said if it was a couple years earlier, my brother would have lost. Some places finally realize that women can be shitty parents too.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:46 AM
6

Wait, he should be grateful that she stuck around just because his experience with women is lacking? How conceited.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/13 07:51 PM
2

More like astrophysics, but rocket science is fairly complex too.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:18 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:17 AM
1

I'm pretty sure I made it clear that I understand that. Read again.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:17 AM
3

It's not really a topic for ELI5. This issue is too deep and complex to explain to a child. I understand that it's not actually aiming to explain to a literal five year old, but some things just can't even be explained in layman's terms. And when they are, some people still bitch about it being tOo complicated. WELL YOU'RE THE ONE WHO ASKED ABOUT FUCKING QUARK STARS.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:59 AM
2

The fact that it clearly doesn't have a neutral tone. I'm not very good with words, so I'm not really sure how to explain what else I think into a coherent sentence. Let me think on it and get back to you. I don't want to dig a hole accidentally.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:54 AM
1

Yeah, I have no problem with what was said, just that it wasn't stated in a neutral way.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:49 AM
6

While a good post, it is clearly biased. I'm not too familiar with that subreddit. I guess they're kind of like wikipedia, where it should be very neutral. Unfortunately, the answers can vary wildly based on your own personal views. The best post on there after everything was deleted was by /u/sillymod. They did say it was a bit more complex, but the issues are too big to explain it like somebody is five. It requires higher thinking to explain and understand.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:21 AM
4

I don't get it. It's the same thing with women in STEM careers. You can't force them to do anything. Your lack of trying does not constitute cries against the "patriarchy" or claims to anyone holding you back. If you choose women's studies and other liberal arts over science and engineering, you cause your own fucking problems.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:21 AM
5

How did this become about smoking anyway? Everyone is missing the point that you were unfairly profiled because you were a man by himself in a park.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:00 AM
1

These days anyway.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:58 AM
1

I try to avoid people at a park if I want my fix. However, if they would complain about still smoking in the park, i would tell the to shove it.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:57 AM
3

You've had a lot of shitty comments in this thread. Did you get here from the front page. What is wrong with an adult using larger swings at a park? You seem to have some kind of stick up your ass. If they playground equipment is properly sized, then go ahead. Parks aren't just for families and children. They are for everybody, even those "creepy looking guys' unless you can prove wrong doing.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:55 AM
8

Stop race baiting you faggot. Stick to the issue at hand.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:49 AM
2

She should stop fucking whining and be a trailblazer if she truly wants equality in the work force. She still has it easier than the women who came be fore her who had no women mentors. What a spoiled fucking child.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 10:17 PM
3

Eh, that would be a bit of a stretch. The punishment should fit the crime, and I don't see it here. There should be a harsher punishment for falsely commuting someone of a crime though.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:14 AM
18

Well he is a part of the patriarchy that propagates the rape culture /s
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:12 AM
1

The thing is, everybody can get by with cheaper brands, unless you have a skin condition that warrants something else. Soap all works the same, and then you wash it down the drain.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:00 PM
3

I come from a divorced family, and while it wasn't a bad divorce, it still sucks for the kids. I don't want to go through a divorce, and I don't want to have kids go through one either.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:23 PM
-1

Not in that sense. In the general sense of things.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:03 PM
7

You must be handy over at /r/frugal
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:15 PM
1

Ah. I find that hard to believe too. I find it hard to believe though. Here in the US, mechanics often work on a flat rate, not an hourly rate. They get paid the same, regardless of the time it took to repair. I guess if they were the hourly rate kind of job, that it would make sense, but with flat rate it would just give the shop more money. Might also make sense if the mechanic had some sort of stake in the business, but then why not do that to everyone?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:36 PM
0

This isn't even a feminist thing. It is an entitlement thing. The article just happens to be biased against men. Unfortunately, a lot of people in both genders have this sense of entitlement.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:09 PM
9

This is why I'm 26, single, and jaded about the dating scene. I'd rather be single and not happy than be married to the wrong woman and unhappy.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:08 PM
3

I bet a lot of the tradesmen stuff can be completed at home with a little bit of knowledge, some handtools, and google. Also, my father was a professional auto mechanic for 25+ years, and I've never heard of different rates for men and women. That would be price discrimination. If you don't want someone to take advantage of you, fucking educate yourself. Ignorance is not my problem.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:06 PM
5

I'm of the mindset that whoever invites should expect to pick up the whole bill, within reason. I wouldn't expect to pick up a shitload of alcoholic drinks if I am not drinking (but I always get em, so I'm not too worried). After you are going steady, I would expect to share in the cost. Maybe not splitting every dinner, but hey, you got it last time so I'll pick it up this time. Isn't being a couple about sharing the load? If they don't think so, maybe they shouldn't continue seeing each other.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:00 PM
9

I'm much more attracted to women who are pale, or who have a noticeable, but not overdone natural tan. I don't want them to be burning their skin laying at the beach, but hey, if you're outdoorsy and get a tan, that alone is attractive. Never understood the spray tan. From my experience, it is a red flashing light for an entitled and vapid personality.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:57 PM
27

She will complain that women need the more expensive, fruity smelling shampoo and conditioner, because guys won't notice her without it! Guys can get by with the cheap walmart brand. I never asked you to buy expensive shit. Get off your entitlement wagon and live within your means. Hell, live well below you means. You don't need to spend a gazillion dollars on super extra exfoliating body wash.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:52 PM
3

I thought this was a circlejerk post, but then I realized it was a real thing. Seriously, what the fuck? /r/nottheonion/
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:02 AM
34

That doesn't give her the right to assault him though. Imagine if the genders were reversed. It would be a major shitstorm.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:00 AM
2

Similar to using "skype" or "google" as a verb.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:57 AM
14

Same thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter