| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | You can't call a woman that!it's not a problem, it's a solution. sometimes we forget proper nouns, and we need to say something | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/07/22 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Wanting men to pay for a dinner date is a good vetting stategieSure, i got no problem with that. I guess the issue i'm getting at here is social communication. If people are explicitly communicating their personal expectations to each other, then it's all good, and everyone gets to make their free choice. But in reality, that's not how it plays out, and communication is imbedded within social norms and expectations. This is really important to how things get heard and interpreted. So somebody expressing an expectation of sex (for example) could easily be in… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/21 05:38 AM |
| 4 | Wanting men to pay for a dinner date is a good vetting stategieFair enough. And it seems reasonable that everyone gets to choose what they expect from a partner. But if someone expects the man to pay, this accepts the principle of difference between the sexes. So for things to be equitable, there would have to be a trade-off somewhere else. Some countervailing responsibility for the woman. Both traditional and non-traditional gender roles seem like reasonable choices, if freely made. But there's a risk of particular responsibilities (and not others) being n… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/21 05:04 AM |
| 1 | Unfortunately only an 8 year sentenceWell, I can't argue with sentence parity. But i'm still curious about the whole separate offences thing........it would be important if they're investigated and prosecuted differently (but this is pure speculation. i have no data on this). Another conceivable answer is that it was simply easier to pass a new law that effectively plugged an existing hole in the legislation. Maybe repealing/replacing the existing statute would be more work (and of no real benefit), so it might have been practical … | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/01/20 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Unfortunately only an 8 year sentenceFair enough... i don't know British law, but i guess Ben's definition is wrong then (though i think we all agree on the moral point). Still interesting if rape and 'sexual assault by penetration' carry the same sentence.......because why would we need two crimes on the books? This implies that the wording (and narrative) are important in an extra-judicial sense. Unless these nominally equitable crimes are prosecuted differently, in which case this particular pussy pass may only be partially deni… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/01/20 01:49 PM |
| 2 | Unfortunately only an 8 year sentenceIf there's a difference between the legal definition, and the definition the Met uses.........i think the Met definition stands. If something is illegal but not enforced....then it's effectively legal. So it doesn't really matter if *legally* she committed rape.....if the Met apply their "only men can rape" policy, then that's how it will be for all intents and purposes. I'm not defending this. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/01/20 01:16 PM |
| 6 | Like a boss...Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. i can't do either correctly | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/12/19 08:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter