TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

justtookit Archive

View 2 posts and 136 comments by justtookit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

Metajusttookit/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 10:06 PM
12

Field Reportjusttookit/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 04:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If Trump decides to bomb the hell out of ISIS Here's Trump deciding to bomb the hell out of ISIS
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 05:06 AM
2

If I could, I would give you a ♂, but what do I know. A possible refinement on this idea of two necessary conditions is to think of them as states instead of levels. Not satiated Satiated Scarcity 1: Desperate 2: Temporarily satiated Abundance 3: Frustrated Alpha 4: Clarity And if considered like a state diagram, with different events causing state transitions, we see that we will always slide back to the left over time, and tend to the top if we don't work against it. It's possible you haven't …
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 12:08 AM
1

We have r-redpillmusic for this. Or you could ask on r-asktrp. How could you think that this belongs on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 08:28 PM
18

I have no direct response to this; the points are solid. Here is my offering for why this is happening to this character: The Compatibility Model. He was taught that the entire subject of sex, women, and finding a mate are not topics to which any effort, logic, or strategy should be applied. That if he were to find a mate, it would be by finding someone who was "compatible" with him. You can see it from his very first sentence: "I don't know what it is about me that women find so unappealing." T…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/15 09:59 PM
5

They are not determined to be childish on account of their arguments. An argument did not put them in that position, so an argument cannot take them out. They are determined to be childish on account of their actions. If someone wants to prove they aren't childish, they should act as if they were not a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 02:01 AM
2

Of course, don't actually use the phrase "gentleman's club", as it's taken by something else in America.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 05:14 PM
12

want to learn how to get a girlfriend Remember your bluepill days. Such a sentence doesn't even make sense to these boys. They don't know that you can learn 'how to get a girlfriend'. What's more, that smacks remotely of predatory language, and will be rejected by their indoctrination. Can't be aggressive towards women! No, that information couldn't possibly exist, and if it did, perish the thought, they certainly wouldn't want to learn it! No one but us is really making the connection between t…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 10:22 PM
3

males are less selective than females True females put much more effort into attracting males. Debateable. Substantiate to continue. In other species the males are often the “pretty ones” because females are the choosers. Males pursue and compete for females. True for some species. Men have few problems finding beautiful females Debateable. Do you mean 'it is easy for males to find attractive females?' females work so hard to make themselves attractive to males. Debateable. Work hard in comparis…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 05:07 PM
10

It's 90 minutes. Is there a most-relevant-section you recommend?
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 02:36 AM
7

Identifying this as a sexual kink is a product of the progressive narrative. It is a clear indicator of mental damage.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:32 AM
2

I don't give a shit how much sex he has I hope he never gets laid
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 01:14 AM
3

True, the fantasy being spun will never arrive. But if you think about the problem in practical terms, it's totally doable. There already exist male sex toys. There already exist automatic male sex toys. VR is on the way. Combine those two and you already have enough to fool yourself into thinking you're having an experience, even in our crude first attempts at bridging the gap. I think the takeaway is that porn will reach such heights through whatever means available, and that irrespective of t…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 04:41 AM
2

What did you expect? The guy made his character by joking about how pathetic he is. He does well because he self-flagellates, makes himself as apologetic and nonthreatening as possible, and supplicates to the progressive religion.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 05:06 PM
2

Progressives talk about the 'true self', 'basic personality', 'inner self', the same way traditionally religious people talk about the soul. You are born with it. It is immutable. Its nature is independent of behavior. Your behavior can mask it, tarnish it, or damage it. It needs to be freed by conforming with the christian/progressive ideology. Nebulously defined and can refer to various things at different times. Encompasses different things at different times, sometimes nothing at all, making…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 11:17 PM
4

You must have this mistaken for /r/thebluepill. Try having a question or discussion point!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 11:48 PM
0

Don't waste your time. She's a bluepiller who posted that to stir up trouble.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 08:16 PM
3

Can you elaborate a bit on what you would be sued for, and the chance of success? Are criminal charges ever pressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 09:06 PM
2

That which is not forbidden is permitted is the phrase both you and Whisper are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 08:37 PM
1

Feminists want to collectively own the means of procreation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 04:50 AM
6

The thing about American government is that the head of the Executive branch is also the head of the military. So the actual question people are asking about this is Would you put a woman in charge of the military?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:52 PM
2

they're mostly talking to newly unplugged men Yes. PPD was a useful tool for honing the ideas I had taken from TRP. Now I see guys go there all smiling and chipper and logical, and I just laugh at my former self. It's a proving ground. The worthy will pass, and move on.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 05:58 AM
9

these people have no ideas at all Yes! As usual. One thing that really pissed me off about PPD is the fact that it is a place where faggots like wazzup987, gay people, transgender people, and virgins all show up to tell heterosexual men how to have relationships and sex. (I'm not mischaracterizing. A glance at any bp-ppd poster's history will likely put them in one of these categories, including self-described virgins. And wazzup really is a spineless waste of space.)
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 05:51 AM
4

I'm very glad you were able to see this as an important refinement of your ideas and not a contradiction. As usual, it's all about finding the good people. The people who you can build something with. And making sure that those good people can find you. One does not seek out psychopaths and leftoids when you seek to build a friendship, a community, a company, a society.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 11:10 PM
4

As usual, defending yourself is prohibited. A year ago /u/Whisper posted a 'Male survival in 21st century America' checklist. It was vilified and picked up by SRS and the like. No one seems to have asked for an explanation. At least here at TRP we can guess what the outline of the explanation would look like. They will always find a way to make you responsible, to make you guilty of something. Save someone from a burning building? You broke her legs. Only saved one of them? Involuntary manslaugh…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 07:50 PM
2

Chess is just the medieval video game. It helps you think logically, causally, and spatially. But it has no other application other than as a diversion. You can fall down the rabbit hole and spend way too much time on it. The probability space is so large, you will easily be lost in it, and die never having seen 1% of it. Computers will always do better than you. Even if you're the best at it, almost nobody cares. Exactly like a video game. That's exactly what it's worth. Decide if that's worth …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 09:02 PM
2

Yes, that was the idea behind https://archive.is/rnsya. We've already explored this. If you don't have anything new to contribute, that you think 110,000 people should see, lurk more.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 11:00 PM
2

That entire link is very entertaining. The thing about talking to people like this is that they shut down all the advanced modes of communication humans have. The things that you depend on a conversational partner to do, they will refuse to do. They will refuse to interpret in context. They will take words at literal value. Usually, we can convey some gestalt with our words. Nope, they’ll arrest the conversation to dissect the literal words you said. Usually it comes from not being able to disse…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 03:47 AM
26

From rps' 100,000 post: Originally the campaign against men included denying that stoicism and fitness were effective with women. They tried to convince a generation of boys that what women really wanted was a dude who shared his feelings and was able to cry on her shoulder. MAKE NO MISTAKE, THIS IS WHAT SOCIETY TAUGHT BOYS. That the purple pill tries to deny it now, telling us that “get fit and confident” has always been a no-brainer is disingenuous. Anybody watching a late 80’s or 90’s movie c…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 10:08 PM
1

You're seeing a lot of morons because your comment was posted to bluepill. Better raise this to 'elevated'.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 12:00 AM
2

"my mother raised me by herself" And they won't say it because it's a lie, they'll say it because she will have made it true.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 01:31 PM
4

This also applies to your laugh! It's not just something you're born with, it's something you can change. If you have a terrible laugh, change it. Change how you contract those muscles, and you will change how you express mirth. There are few laughs as awful as the snort. Don't snort.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 04:14 AM
12

'If a society was an equal environment, men's and women's locker rooms and bathrooms wouldn't exist. Everyone would just use one bathroom.'
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 04:05 PM
-1

What you provided is not an example of what you described.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:18 PM
0

That post is exactly the policy for women in TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:17 PM
-1

You will not provide an example because what you described doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:16 PM
1

Show an example of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:05 PM
2

Women are not banned from TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:02 PM
72

If these people had healthy concepts of relationships, they'd have healthy relationships. Instead, they're in /r/DeadBedrooms.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 12:33 PM
8

Hahaha! Reports? 'Hey, /r/deadbedrooms, I found something that works!' 'TAKE IT DOWN'
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 04:07 AM
2

Does this describe your position? B1a. If [compromising and trying something new for your partner] is not equivalent to ([something you are comfortable doing] and not [something you would not do without coercion]) then [compromising and trying something new for your partner] is equivalent to [abuse]. B1b. If [compromising and trying something new for your partner] is not equivalent to ([something you are comfortable doing] and [something you would do without coercion]) then [compromising and try…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 03:42 AM
1

Does this describe your position? A1a. [Compromising and trying something new for your partner] [is abuse] if [there are consequences]. A1b. If [there are consequences] then ([compromising and trying something new for your partner] is equivalent to [abuse]).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 02:55 AM
3

(From the male perspective) It's because there are actually two numbers there, and people talk as if they were the same number. Relationship partners and sexual partners are different, but because of what someone may or may not call a relationship, or an attempted relationship, the sets might overlap. No male who understands this cares how many sexual partners his sexual partners have had. But it is a good idea take note of how many relationship partners your relationship partner has had. If she…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 06:22 PM
0

The title applies to life in general as well. Low expectations High expectations Bad reality :-l :-( Good reality :-) :-l Pick this column /\ ; not the second one /x\ I am so tired of explaining to people why they should never put their hopes up, and they never listen.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 09:21 PM
2

And failure to comply with Title IX will result in pulling all federal funding. No college, not even Harvard, the country's richest, is willing to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 12:13 AM
2

And I suspect this is the hurtful material Hitchens alluded to in his "Women aren't funny" articles.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 12:09 AM
2

In the words of Karen Straughan, Women are human beings, men are human doings.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 12:03 AM
6

Remember that we only judge risk-taking after the result has been revealed. If it goes well, we call it 'brave' or 'courageous', if it goes poorly, we call it 'idiotic' or 'stupid'. I don't know exactly what inclined you to go the other way, but people will disagree with you here because what we saw was risk taking that turned out well, so they 'have big balls'.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 03:03 PM
1

So you understand what they mean. I probably also don't have to explain why generalizations are useful. I don't understand at all how using generalizations is 'shitting on English'. Nor why that would make it a terrible place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 04:08 PM
1

So I don't understand why mislabeling something (in your opinion) makes it a terrible place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 04:04 PM
2

I'm interested to know of examples of this [using sexism in a morally bad way].
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 04:02 PM
1

it really should be "The best way to go about life is to think that all women are like that. They really aren't though. It is just going to give you the best results if you assume all women are like that." Do you realize this is exactly what they mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 03:35 PM
2

but don't call them bio truths without more evidence than that. You'd be mollified if we would just call them something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 03:34 PM
2

You're right it is. I realized the world is a shitty place. Some parts are more shitty than others. I am just pointing out that TRP is more shitty than others when it comes to sexism. We talked past each other. You caught the wrong aspect of what I was trying to say. What I mean is that sexism is just a part nature, and so is not itself good or bad. (The sexism that we're talking about)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 03:33 PM
3

horrible sexism And? The universe is sexist. You still live in the universe. belief in certain bio truths when there are other cultures that don't have those bio truths Whatever these may be, I don't think that making generalizations from what we observe that may not apply in some other place we've never been makes anything a 'horrible place'. complete disregard for the English language Posters and commenters on TRP are of a higher quality than the majority of other subs on reddit. So you must b…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 03:13 PM
2

Why do you think it's a terrible place?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 03:00 PM
1

I wouldn't argue with fauxfauxfaux22 here. He has a viewpoint that will take him a long time to shed, if ever. He thinks that we are completely in control of our actions, so he waves the personal responsibility flag vigorously. He clutches it tightly because it is at the core of his worldview. But really we're just a collection of molecules which will react in the same way to given conditions and stimuli as other bags of water. Yes, TRP is a place where we decide to take responsibility for the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 02:50 PM
1

Go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 01:07 PM
115

This is really good. It doesn't ramble. There's no fluff. Every point is even handed, focused, and logical. Incredibly useful and at the appropriate level of abstraction. Has examples. Open to extension and specificity in the comments. I love this sub. Everything my father should have taught me and more. Note that the information on tactics provided here should be combined with the social skills we also learn about here (such as remaining silent after making your point and forcing the other pers…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 05:41 PM
3

You're being downvoted for being correct. I am completely unconvinced by a psychological analysis of what is an ideological phenomenon. It makes no sense to say that leftists are people who are psychologically different from non-leftists: all kinds of psychological profiles are born into both leftist and rightist environments, and it is the ideology that changes the way they think. Progressivism is just another ideology. All of the same rules apply to it as to other ideologies, such as Christian…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 05:15 PM
3

few RPers actually understand TRP That's probably true. I'll make a note of that. We have to figure out how to make sure that the majority of RPers genuinely understand what's really being discussed there. So you were thinking of the average, mostly lurker RPer, and I was thinking of the ECs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:21 PM
1

Thanks for bringing your expertise here. It looks like you're talking about those testosterone pill commercials that started a few years ago. The manipulativeness of those commercials was grossly obvious. This is a community where some men take and talk about steroids. These guys might hear 'testosterone', and think you're talking about or even attacking them. This might be why you're going to see a lot of denial in this thread. But if I've understood correctly, then you message is aimed at the …
/r/TheRedPill31/03/15 02:26 PM
3

If you'd like to talk about how TRP is an internet community and so will of course be filled with people who have no qualifications and are talking out of their ass, we can talk about that. But before we move on, I'd like you to either agree or disagree with the notion that because we understand what one another means over there, we can use status/behavior interchangeably (still incorrect, but understandable). Excluding the newbies who actually don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:43 PM
2

But do you understand that it applies to the behavior/status terminology we were talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:19 PM
1

I understand I did not give you the lists you wanted. I made a TLC warning you about why your efforts here were ill advised.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:11 PM
6

The reason TRP is so hard to define is that its reason for coming into existence is our culture's lack of guidance for men. As such, we created a subculture to fill those needs. But having lacked for masculine guidance, men didn't know precisely what those needs were, and the mission is therefore constantly changing as we (re)discover them. --u/whipser I hope this helps your efforts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:06 PM
4

Reddit's favorite criticism! I'm going to take that as you didn't understand, so I'll explain clearly. When everyone understands the underlying concepts and the difference between two concepts, those people can use the wrong words and still be understood, and still know that everyone in their circle continues to understand the difference between the concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:04 PM
2

Did you totally miss my point or are you just being contrarian? Or do you have a point I'm not seeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:55 PM
1

Once you have a good understanding of gravitational force, and your peers know that you do, and they do too, you all just call it your 'weight'.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:42 PM
18

This reads as sarcastic humor, but is actually totally plausible (minus hyperbole), which is more credit than you were giving yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:38 PM
11

/u/17b29a's average post length is 18.25 words!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:27 AM
18

Where do SJWs come from? Do they just spawn in graveyards, like dementors? Not quite. You happen to have escaped the indoctrination. But a large portion of the men here were blue pill, so we can fill you in on how we became blue pill. You have to understand that Feminism3 is a religion. It is a subsect of the Church of Progressivism. And just like how people in the middle of America become indoctrinated in the Christian churches that surround them, people on the coasts of America become indoctri…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 02:27 PM
4

It's true, I've come across commenters here, even long time commenters, who are insufferable and childish. Newcomers learn that 'assholes' can find pussy, and that to have pussy, one should be more like them... more like an asshole. This is a misunderstanding of The Red Pill. For either of two reasons: You are emulating a moron, who by chance of not having been indoctrinated in blue pill ideologies, managed to exhibit qualities that made him attractive to women. While doing so will work, applied…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 11:30 PM
1

Oh sure, those particular crimes are worse than murder. But the modern concept, typical instance of rape is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 09:53 PM
-1

I think murder is a worse crime than rape. Rape victims can live to tell the tale, to go on to heal, and to lead productive lives. You'll have to work to convince me otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 04:03 AM
1

The reason TRP is so hard to define is that its reason for coming into existence is our culture's lack of guidance for men. As such, we created a subculture to fill those needs. But having lacked for masculine guidance, men didn't know precisely what those needs were, and the mission is therefore constantly changing as we (re)discover them. --u/whisper
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 03:42 AM
1

You want a citation for the fact that civilization exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 03:35 AM
2

No, this is a tyro level understanding of red pill. Matrix usage for flavor: Neo: You're saying that I can have more pussy? Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm saying that when you're ready, you won't want to. *Where 'want to' is short for 'care if you do or don't'. Red pill has been evolving away from a sexual strategy sub for some time now. It about learning to be men, and women are attracted to men, with some caveats. Pussy comes with the territory. In rediscovering what it is to be male, to be masculine,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:55 PM
2

No, this is a tyro level understanding of red pill. Matrix usage for flavor: Neo: You're saying that I can have more pussy? Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm saying that when you're ready, you won't want to. *Where 'want to' is short for 'care if you do or don't'. Red pill has been evolving away from a sexual strategy sub for some time now. It about learning to be men, and women are attracted to men, with some caveats. Pussy comes with the territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:53 PM
2

Men haven't been denied the right to vote. OK, I will give you this one. Don't give her that. As usual, that's a case of feminists looking at what the most successful men have and complaining that they don't have it, while the rest of men are invisible to them. Men were denied the right to vote all the time. In some cases most men couldn't vote. In fact, I argue that universal suffrage is a right exclusive to women in the US, since men have to pay for their right to vote with responsibility (arm…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:07 PM
3

I think you're mistaking the idea the 48 author had in mind. He wasn't talking about isolation, he meant to remain flexible and mobile, to have your protection come in the form of a shifting network instead of from physical things as an analogy for a few powerful sources or places. I can see how you might stretch it to apply to actual contact with other people, but understand that people who don't use social media can still be just as connected as those who do. It's interesting to see how social…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 10:02 PM
44

Wow, I thought this was going to be a vacuous treatise on social media from a communications major (who has never and will never do a day of work in their lives). This is actually a good tip.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:33 PM
5

They've been having real trouble since the 100,000 post hit. The quality of submissions to TRP jumped up another notch, and they just haven't been able to bite into it at all. At one point their front page only had about 3 links to TRP, and they were mostly comments. I think they're bored by it. After all, TRP is men learning to be men, and TBP is teenage girls; the subject deeply bores them.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:58 PM
1

Do you think that you're a male? Do you think that you're a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 05:37 PM
5

Don't forget men are probably more likely to negotiate salary at hiring time, and are probably better at it. If you can't negotiate for 5% more, are you really a good negotiator?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 02:13 PM
7

Since I joined, there have been a number of pruning rules introduced to guide submissions, such as no fiction-as-examples, no bro-knighting, no race-whining, etc. I don't see anywhere they've been compiled so that newbies can be aware of those guidelines. 'Posting Rules & Guidelines' seems outdated.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 03:27 PM
1

That column was supposed to be problems that people perceive they have.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 01:59 AM
1

I don't know if the formatting worked, but that part was supposed to be in a small font so you would recognize it as a peripheral thought. Please do me the favor of reading it again, without the last sentence.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 10:55 PM
1

Just because it comes with marriage doesn't mean it comes from marriage. We maintain that while rare, it is possible to have that benefit without having married. Single fathers will have half the potential extended family size.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 10:46 PM
1

What we don't understand is why you think marriage provides any of those benefits. We think that one can have those things without marriage. Can you explain?
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 10:27 PM
0

Also, here's a way to self blame: Instead of accusing your readers of low comprehension, assume that it is your skills in making a point that are lacking.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:13 PM
1

Ok I see it now. This is what I thought you were agreeing to: Net bad = benefits (zero) - cost (positive) You say there are cases where something good comes of marriage. Can you list any? We are actively seeking those benefits in this discussion, you should post them as a TLC if you have them. I thought you were displaying cognitive dissonance because (I thought) you agreed that marriage was net bad, but you were planning on acting/advising as if it wasn't. Not misuse, just misunderstanding.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:07 PM
2

Here's another blog post for you: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/110727696721/your-best-orgasms-are-ahead-of-you The author of Dilbert incidentally reflects a lot of RP. (It's a blog post about not exactly VR sex, but about how robotics and accumulated computation will improve sex beyond human abilities.)
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 06:10 PM
0

You're contradicting yourself. You said it's true that marriage is bad for you no matter what your personal values are. If you concluded that marriage is bad, then you've already agreed that the costs outweigh the benefits. Then you go on to list a bunch of situations where men take on risk because there is sufficient reward to warrant it. Please take note of your cognitive dissonance.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 05:32 PM
2

Am I wrong or is every RP person here forgetting that alpha and beta are descriptors for behavior/frame of mind, and that a person can change between the two?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 12:44 AM
4

Do not post, comment, or vote here without reading all of the material in the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 05:56 AM
5

Thanks, this is just what I needed. I am becoming wrapped up in the self-improvement and forgetting the infantrymen. Good course-correction.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 04:12 AM
1

we've evolved to operate in the abstract No, we didn't. Like /u/CleverNeologism said, it's an after-market accessory. We evolved massive frontal lobes for the purposes of complex, adaptable movement. http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_wolpert_the_real_reason_for_brains?language=en
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 03:00 AM
4

Very similar. Many of us can conclude that feminism has deep negative impacts on the lives of boys and men because feminism had a deeply negative impact on our lives and we are male. It's our lived experience. But it's just dismissed, because it's men talking about their problems. Try this thread: https://np.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/2qvlky/mit_eecs_professor_on_the_feminist_stem_guys/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 03:44 PM
2

I think question 2 has too many interpretations. I also said C, but changed it to B. You cited the $200K/year as a reason. But he also listed "taking work over the weekend" as a possible avenue. If that's what you choose, to work on unpaid time, he (your boss) basically just walked up to you and said, "lower the price at which you sell your time." And you said, "ok." On the other hand, if you have people to delegate to, which was another option listed, you're using other people's work to appear …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:34 AM
24

You call it 'peanut gallery'. I call people who do this Agents of Apathy. As anyone who has even attempted to be productive knows, apathy is the enemy. Agents of Apathy are the kind of people who will sit back and criticize the work of others--wait, 'criticism' is too generous; they will detract from the work of others and never make anything themselves. They are the people who always act not just as if they were superior in a conversation, but as if they were superior to the entire conversation…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:11 AM
3

So I take it you are admitting you were wrong when you said this one: using anyone means you don't respect them as a human being instead of this one, i can have a cleaning lady and care about her as a human being or not care about her as a human being. her being a cleaning lady has nothing to do with whether i respect her as a human being. thereby alleviating the contradiction. But now I'm again unclear on how [using women for sex] is related to [having a negative view of women].
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:52 PM
3

So using someone has no bearing on whether you respect them as a human being?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:23 PM
2

Does that judgement extend to all human relationships? Between soldier/superior officer? Customer/cashier? Contractor/homeowner?Friends? Conversational partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:10 PM
6

What I learned from this exchange is that BP thinks TRP has a negative view of women. Can you elaborate on how [using women for sex] is related to [having a negative view of women]? It's not clear to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:02 PM
8

Does this correctly represent your thought process: A1) TRP has a negative view of women. A2) TRP shouldn't have a negative view of women because there is no reason to. A3) TRP is a group A4) A group having an unwarranted negative view of a class of people is sufficient criterion for qualifying as a hate group. A5) :: TRP is a hate group.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 06:44 PM
4

Can you show me the thought process behind thinking TRP is a hate group?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 06:26 PM
3

One of the things that will be important as we reach the 150k threshold, after which subs usually go to shit, is subscribers themselves knowing what kind of content belongs on the sub. Seems simple, but with discussion subs like this, where most posts are self posts, it can be difficult to tell what should be said and what doesn't need to be said. For example, this post. It doesn't say anything. There's no point, no knowledge. And you have no place making this post. Yes, we're going to want to c…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 01:47 AM
7

One of my great mentors had an excellent precept: "It's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys."
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 11:49 PM
1

I made it an unrelated note so I could put it in the pensieve, and not make the comment about it. Unfortunately, you went ahead and commented on that part instead of the part where I actually had a point. I never said that you said anything. I wasn't constructing an argument nor representing yours, so I wasn't making a strawman either. I was just noting on how I had the sense from that comment that confirmed the earlier analysis of /r/PurplePillDebate. Sigh. I was looking to have a little chat a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 08:34 PM
1

TRP doesn't know And I'm glad it doesn't. Religions purport to know. Because when you know, you can't be wrong. TRP is indifferent to whether it is right or wrong, and lets you pick and choose the things that you find yield results. ---/ Unrelated note, the sense that you have to find something that knows is true to the analysis on how blue pill is all about moralizing and being the absolute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 07:53 PM
1

Can you tell us what you hope to learn from this? Will you share it with us later?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 06:33 PM
2

Here's a video takedown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F30lWAiD_3A [20 mins]
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 04:03 PM
1

When I think of evolution, I usually picture something that works over the course of millions of years, or at least a couple hundred thousand years. I also assume we're talking about biological evolution, and when we talk about language or legal systems I don't think we're talking about that evolution anymore. I've wondered about that: people like to think that our skin colors will converge on some hue which is an average of everyone's. I think that's nonsense, because while you reminded me what…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:38 AM
1

I'd be very interested indeed to hear of cases where evolution causes a decrease in diversity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:16 AM
1

if men don't want to be in relaitionships, explain oneitis? Maybe oneitis is a man wanting to be in a relationship. Maybe it's a man desperately wanting a steady supply of sex. men and women are different but to suggest they are polar opposites is simplistic black and white thinking, and wrong. I never did. I think you're referring to the inverse relationship I pointed out that was revealed by the study, and now it looks to me like you're using that to appear as if you have a more nuanced or sop…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:00 AM
3

I assumed you were part of the blue pill hivemind. Here's why. I think your opinion here is misandry: people who carry on multiple concurrent non-serious sexual relationships as fucked up. women, on average, want to be in relationships. men are less wired that way but many still value relationships and/or at least other people's feelings. Note: men are less wired that way Not just less wired that way, but oppositely wired, as the quotation clearly stated. I will make this correction in my interp…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 02:16 AM
1

Are you aware you entered into an argument where you insisted that seeing multiple partners was fucked up? And doubled down on it, and tripled down on it, and... I thought you were supposed to be sexually inclusive, to be tolerant of people who wished to live different lifestyles, like taking on multiple partners simultaneously...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 12:30 AM
4

Too easy, wouldn't you say? Yes, we all know TBP isn't funny. Like 2+2=?, it should make you suspicious of how easy it is. The only way this thread can develop is into a shitslinging contest. I think it's your duty to remove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 12:41 AM
8

Something so special you didn't even bother to name it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 01:13 AM
5

Feminism is You took the bait. We know that you're spot on about feminism. But that's not relevant when debating modern religions. Religions are a subset of ideologies. Usually the difference between the two is that a religion has a foundational text. Feminism is an ideology. It's what religions look like when born in the 20th century and beyond. Ideologies are the new religions, because they can adapt faster, and they're harder to combat. In what ways are they harder to combat? A weakness of re…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 07:35 PM
3

This is the moralizing silliness that RP is supposed to cure. Take the first part of the post on marriage by /u/Whisper https://archive.today/1kV90#selection-1847.0-1883.104 Just the part I highlighted, reproduced here: Marriage was a contract. What's a contract? It's an agreement between two or more people, which has some critical characteristics that are needed in order to make it work. Let's call those out specifically. A contract exists between two or more people who are considered competent…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 05:28 PM
1

Is this comment on the wrong post? You are ill advised to do so. But if you do, make sure to do it right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F30lWAiD_3A
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 05:17 PM
2

Well you seem to know what you are doing, and you will do whatever you want to do, but the issue with marriage today isn't really even about your mate. It's about the legal nature of marriage in America. Here's a damning analysis of modern marriage delivered by our respected /u/Whisper: https://archive.today/1kV90 You'll have to decide whether you are ready for the fallout from engaging in such an imbroglio should it go wrong. Are you confident enough to engage in necromancy? Consider whether yo…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:15 PM
3

I'm concerned this guy (Furusawa) is awfully close to just applying an inverted feminist narrative. As /u/Whisper says, feminism is essentially applying Marxism-Leninism to gender relations, with males as the bourgeoisie and females as the proletariat. When we feel like the victims, we are inclined to apply the same narrative in reverse: females as the oppressors and males the underclass. While we know this to be closer to the truth than the feminist narrative, it puts one in the position of bei…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 12:35 AM
1

Here's a debunking of this garbage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oawIB21TdLM [20 mins] Turns out no, not all men are scary rapists lying in wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 05:01 AM
1

I haven't read all of your comment because you're still clearly plugged in (and not as others suspect, a troll). But I'll link you Karen Straughan for what she had to say on historical oppression. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eqYEVYZgdo [30 mins]
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 04:27 AM
1

I knew I couldn't find something!
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:37 PM
3

That really is hilarious. It's so characteristic of women. There's a word for males, 'guys'. It's all purpose, and has proven very useful in language. There is no matching word for females. 'Girls' is the closest, but some women don't like being called that. After all, isn't 'girl' supposed to match 'boy'? Isn't 'woman' supposed to match 'man'? 'Ladies'? I'm not a lady, I'm too young! 'Gals'? Sounds old timey. 'Chicks'? Downright insulting. And every woman will have different opinions on each of…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 07:44 AM
3

AdviceAnimals hasn't been a default since the last shuffle, several months ago.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 11:07 PM
2

That's true. I stayed away from here because of what I heard about it. It was supposedly so blasphemous that I shouldn't even bother to visit it.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 04:30 PM
2

All sex is rape: https://archive.today/dgy5r
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 04:31 PM
6

So when people go to learn to teach high school, it's like high school?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 06:25 AM
1

I think you should delete this comment. There was no point in the parent comment to which you should be responding. You are justifying yourself like a frazzled hen and using the manipulative tactics we are here to learn to see past. This does not contribute to any discussion. Rarely does the downvote popup apply so well to a comment: "Still plugged in"
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 08:24 PM
1

Wait, I don't understand. America needs more women in technology Because we need brain power Are you implying that females have greater brain power than males or something? Did you just mean more people in technology?
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 03:53 AM
6

By the way, let's comment on the creep factor here, or lack thereof. Can you imagine, I mean, can you imagine the shitstorm which would ensue if a man had dressed up as a woman and attempted to infiltrate female circles?
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 07:01 AM
3

Right! She's claiming to have experienced being male, when in reality what she did was dress up in the clothes of another tribe, infiltrate some of their activities, and masquerade as a friend for a few months. That doesn't license someone to speak authoritatively on the tribe in question, and she shouldn't be viewed as having undertaken the male experience in full, but a tiny fraction. And yet there she is in the interview, reporting to a teammate on the fascinating and primitive tribe she live…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 06:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter