TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

justwasted Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by justwasted on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Half the purses and heels.
/r/PussyPass04/10/19 11:36 AM
1

Women are typically have less aptitude in mathematical skills and in general their abilities stay closer to the mean.
/r/PussyPass24/06/19 06:32 AM
33

Watching the big corporations lie to your face, in real time, over something as insignificant as the latest superhero flick, should really give pause to think about all of the really important issues.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:51 AM
2

Assistance for single parent households perversely incentivizes single parent households. Discussing efforts to ensure equal pay means accepting, prior to any evidence that such a thing exists, that pay is unequal.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 02:21 PM
74

How feminism leads to totalitarianism: Criminal acts are criminalized Feminists get upset at specific acts which they demand must be specifically targeted with additional penalties above and beyond other crimes Cycle repeats until every offense (by a man) is criminalized beyond any propriety or justice
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:53 AM
4

Men don't have a higher salary. They have higher earnings. Look at the Uber driver data. Men and women are paid the same rate, which is a provably true statement. Men still earn more than women because men do more, harder work.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:48 AM
29

Imagine if you could sort by companies not on these lists. You'd immediately find a product that was competing on quality & value, not discrimination and handouts.
/r/PussyPass24/05/18 08:01 PM
1

Sex and gender are synonymous terms. Even the academic term gender role, a shorthand for "social conceptions of sexed male/female behavior" overlaps almost identically with biological patterns of behavior that can be empirically tested through genetic & hormonal testing, not to mention looking at behavior patterns of close animal species.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:35 AM
3

Next? This has already been the play for decades.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:00 AM
1

I don't think anyone (should) dispute that fatherlessness is bad, but trying to pin fatherlessness as the source of behavioral differences that exist between racial groups across every known social situation, in every nation of the world, is simply wishful thinking.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 08:31 PM
3

The point being made is that it's easy to see the benefits other people have, but ignore the responsibilities. Women see men in positions of wealth, power, and authority, but ignore that most men don't occupy those positions (the apex fallacy). Feminists, even the 1st and 2nd wave feminists that apologists so often defend, generally had far more social status and influence than the men they were busily condemning. Even early feminist arguments are largely predicated on flimsy non-empirical argum…
/r/PussyPass21/03/18 05:02 AM
2

I've been using DuckDuckGo for years. This isn't going to realistically affect Google's bottom line though.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:22 PM
3

Google certainly could (and should) be more neutral. Having a bias is unavoidable, but Google's campaign of censorship of wrongthink, shadowbanning, and deplatforming is not acceptable in a free society where its services are integral to the function of the internet.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:26 PM
24

It's criminal how little attention this is getting. Ensuring Google stays roughly neutral as a search tool is absolutely essential to staving off impending totalitarianism. Donated. Good luck James, any help that I can provide, I will.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:46 AM
2

I don't think these are identical definitions of "having your shit together." It's a fuzzy term. This sort of resentment doesn't sound very useful, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:44 AM
8

Peterson's general thesis is that men who have their shit together are attractive to women and therefore when you get your life in order by being successful and having a partner, you won't be resentful. (All true, and a valid message to deliver to young men regardless of the fact that women also need to be told to grow the hell up and take responsibility). I don't suppose to know why Peterson isn't trying to deliver admitions to women, but we can speculate & extrapolate. (1.) Peterson's idea is …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:57 AM
2

It's an earnings gap. NOT a wage gap. The language used is important.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:01 AM
2

But the "wage gap" doesn't exist. Comparing earnings of men as a group and women as a group is just statistically so superficial that waving that flag shows absolute innumeracy. People pushing this agenda need to be called out on it, again, and again, and again, and shamed for their deceitful and manipulative twisting of words.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:01 AM
5

driving The insurance companies maintain that men are statistically more likely to be in serious car accidents. Unfortunately I think this is a very crude breakdown and doesn't account for a host of behavioral features which could be used to determine with better accuracy who is actually a risky driver, versus who is a responsible driver. My statistical predictions: Men overall drive more miles than women Men overall drive more in situations that are more dangerous (high congestion areas & time)…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:57 AM
7

The broader point is that SJW-figures are eager to point at certain things (like blind auditions) and suggest that an observed disparity in hiring is a result of discrimination. However this is not proven by the evidence. In fact, the evidence may suggest the opposite, or something completely unrelated. We simply don't know because the data is so sparse and minimally examined. It's important to thoroughly examine claims of this nature precisely because the tendency for motivated-interpretation o…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:21 AM
14

One of the claims SJWs have made is that using black curtain auditions has resulted in more egalitarian hiring among orchestras, etc. However, it's difficult to believe that the hiring process actually is fully anonymous (from resume to position offer) in such a way that we can ascertain that merit-based black curtain auditions are actually the cause for the rise in women & minority representation. As far as I know there have been no studies to examine whether this is actually the case. There ha…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:54 PM
5

For many people, the internet is the sole source of news. There are legitimate, hard questions about what should and should be possible on the internet. But the fact of the matter is that the single most powerful internet entity (Google) is actively pursuing a political agenda in censoring via search results prioritization, demonetization, de-listing, and other stealth censorship tactics that make 1984's party look like amateurs. If that doesn't worry the hell out of you, then you might as well …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 03:33 AM
29

This is disingenuous. Social policies that are ignorant of basic biological realities and treat humans like they are interchangeable automatons are destructive and ignorant. Women who lie about rape to male protector figures are absolutely culpable for the violence they incite.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 05:33 AM
1

Sure. It's ridiculous to be biased against male carers when you are sitting in your home and perusing NannyForHire.com and can do thorough background checks and in-person vetting. It's quite another when you find yourself in a dangerous situation and just want to avoid getting assaulted.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:52 PM
1

The point I was making is your perception of acceptable risk is not necessarily shared by others. Furthermore, you're making behavior recommendations on values acting like they are static, when in fact taking your advice increases your risk by unpredictable values. Also shaming language for people wanting to protect themselves or their loved ones is just shitty.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:12 PM
1

0.01 is unacceptably large if it's something that you're putting yourself at risk for frequently... Especially if it involves potential for death or other major bodily harm. Murder is just the apex of a whole slew of unpleasant violent crimes that you might find yourself facing, for example. This reasoning is so bad that I wonder if it's just meant to discredit the sub here.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:31 PM
7

It almost makes me wish she were right. After all if her mental processes were so strongly shaped by 'society' and 'gender' rather than her own biological impulses, then it'd certainly be strong enough to get her to realize that Feminism is self-contradictory, deceitful, and destructive.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:42 AM
1

You're not wrong, but fuck employers who look down on people working remotely. People can be connected all the time via cell phones and remote desktop easily. At some workplaces, being 'in the office' makes you less accessible and productive, just because you're liable to be off shooting the shit with a coworker or scrounging leftovers from the kitchen downstairs, etc. Encountered this hundreds of times, but remote workers not being accessible only a handful.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/16 07:56 PM
15

Why was the cast for the movie 4 women? Because they wanted to tap into the feminist demographic. It is absolutely predictable that any objection to the GB being cast as women would be shouted down as sexist. If you don't think that the movie studios were directly counting on that as part of marketing then you're just hopelessly naive.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 05:34 PM
28

The language section of the test had the word analogies (logic) portion removed because girls did poorly on it. They also added a third section 'Writing' on the unstated premise that girls will do better on it. This is on top of a general dumbing down of the test in various different ways. Men in general have more aptitude variation than women, so making it easier to score high by reducing the difficulty of the test disproportionately benefits women, while not reflecting the true variation in ap…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:45 PM
7

That'd be fine if we didn't have the political and legal fiction requiring that these two kinds of workers be compensated in the same way.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:56 AM
3

In two years at my last job I think I took less than a week off. In the office every day, early. Eat at desk. Leave late and work tons of overtime (salary). The one serious illness I got rendered me unable to even use my arm due to a shoulder injury. The two women in the office? One works from home two days a week. The other takes random days off every other week because she wants to visit DJ concerts. Both constantly late in the office, leaving early or taking extra long social lunches. Sick da…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:56 AM
3

By this metric aren't a good 95%+ of women domestic abusers? Maybe I just have a skewed perspective from my home environment but I rarely see a woman who doesn't condescendingly talk about her husband as clueless, inept, etc. In public that's the kind of thing that's done humorously, but in private I have little doubt these women say this kind of thing all the time passive aggressively.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:20 AM
1

And there are various remains found in NA proving the continent was settled before those of the asiatic migrants (the people we call 'Native Americans') arrived. Not surprisingly, these precursors were probably wiped out by warfare and their lands taken over.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter