TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jvardrake Archive

View 0 posts and 355 comments by jvardrake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

"Jumps up and down Furiously and Shreiks like a Leprechaun Tricked out of His Pot of Gold". LOL. Thank you for this. Man, this is good stuff. I've heard of "hopping mad", but had never seen it til now. That ended tonight.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/23 08:52 AM
119

It's especially infuriating to me because, every single time men run into something that negatively affects them, society's response is to tell them, "Well, you chose to do X. Now you have to man up, and live with that decision". How many women nowadays are in some sort of situation where their "tyrant husband" forced them to quit their jobs, have children, raise those children, and never re-enter the work force? I'm guessing the number is effectively zero. They are choosing to put themselves in…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 09:38 PM
59

Just like they did with colleges, isn't it? In 1970, men account for 59% of college students? OMG! This could only be the case if there is discrimination! We are failing our girls! Completely change the education system to favor girls, and have a near endless supply of programs/scholarships that are female only... Women now outnumber men 3 to 2 at college in the US? That's just because girls are better students. Not only not make any changes to help boys, actually leave the previous programs to …
/r/MensRights01/02/23 11:12 PM
12

This. This post is so fucking painfully fake, it's unbelievable anyone could view it as "real". The person writing it literally hit every standard point about the debate, like they were going down a checklist.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:54 PM
-1

Where would be the harm? Every single person's DNA, on file - done to you before you are even able to consent - accessible by the government... Yeah. No.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:55 PM
4

It's almost like she's "notorious" for being a hyper partisan, hyper political (i.e., not very good) Supreme Court justice, and not for anything that's objectively good. Hmm....
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:15 AM
99

What if you just bypass all that? What if she just wrote this same article, but replaced "men" with "blacks"? Black people, give women some distance. Either slow up, or cross the street. They feel unsafe around you, and that's your problem. Be understanding about that. Who would fucking tolerate this??? No one. Seriously. This situation we have in society now, where the left has deemed that just absolutely disgusting prejudice/discrimination is OK now, so long as it's against the "right" targets…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:58 PM
9

She literally was born privileged and wants to continue to paint the picture that all men are more privileged than her. The bigger problem is the system (like CNN here, but also the leftists in the schools, at the social media companies, the ones entrenched in government institutions, etc) that help her set the narrative. This system is what is responsible for indoctrinating so many people into this destructive ideology. This system is what allows stupidity like "the gender pay gap" endure.
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/22 12:45 AM
25

Or 40% male teachers. Seriously. Total hiring freeze on women until they get there. It is so goddamn tiresome to see feminists/leftists continuously get to pick and choose where they want to see equality, and where it seemingly doesn't matter. This boundless hypocrisy where, if there aren't enough men doing x, it must mean they just don't want to, so fuck 'em, but if there aren't enough women doing x, "OMG! We are failing our mothers/daughters! We must move heaven and earth until it is addressed…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 08:27 PM
33

Not if it were a Japanese man who abducted the children back to Japan. Japan is notorious for how bad their system is regarding parental rights. Even if it’s two Japanese nationals getting divorced, the parent who has the children at the time of divorce can simply hold them indefinitely. Even their ex prime minister Koizumi had this happen. He kept two of the children permanently (and the mother never saw them), she kept the youngest, and he never saw him. The problem here is that their divorce …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:59 AM
14

Yeah. This whole thing reminds me of this classic...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 07:12 PM
182

This is exactly what they did with all of college, in general. More men than women are getting degrees? OMG! We are failing our daughters! How could society allow this to happen! The only way this could possibly be is that the system is biased to help men! The entire system needs to be changed! Now that women account for 2/3 of all degrees, and the ratio of men:women keeps decreasing every year? Well, girls are just naturally better students. Obviously, there are going to be more women graduatin…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 06:37 AM
25

It's not about marketing. Women are simply naturally MUCH better at receiving sympathy from society. We are built like this. Women have a far larger in-group preference than men, and (if we're being honest) men are designed to be near obsessed with wanting to mate with them, which biases us towards assigning them higher value as well. On top of that, women have used that built in sympathy to construct our current education situation (in the west), in which every person now goes through 12+ years…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 03:28 PM
253

None of that matters. It should have been plain as day, to anyone paying attention, that nearly none of these hardcore feminist types (or sjw types, for that matter), ever wanted equality, or anything like that. These people are far more hateful than anyone they claim to oppose. They don't want equality. They simply want "their turn" to be the oppressors.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 09:55 PM
18

And the best part is that, if they actually achieve what they want to achieve - to make men the minority in STEM jobs - they will definitely NOT all of a sudden go, "Oh, we went too far, and I guess we need to help boys now", they will simply go, "Well, girls do better in college STEM programs, so obviously there are going to be more of them in the field. You must be a misogynist if you don't agree with this". They definitely will NOT agree that the reason for that becoming reality is because th…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:08 PM
105

They must have cut out the scene right before this where one of the other officials told her, "Look, I'm going to take you into this other room, with this other guy, and if you act like like a total asshole, and then slap him, we'll let you go. Do you understand? Don't forget, though: 1. Total Asshole. 2. Slap the guy in the other room. Your release is all contingent on that! Now, let's go." Those sneaky bastards - editing that stuff out.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 09:33 PM
1

It's even better than just being a "white female dem". I wonder what sort of "legislation" this sort of person would work ("24 hours a day") on? Hmm....
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/18 09:35 PM
4

It's not just the hypocrisy. It's not even that this stupid, bigoted, asshole is going to be on their editorial board - helping to shape the newspaper's (and thus a bit of society's) narrative. It's that these mainstream media companies have the audacity to continue to pretend that they are some sort of righteous beacons of democracy's free press; however, time and time again, stuff like this keeps happening, and it keeps exposing them as the sjw, radical leftist propaganda machines that they ar…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:13 PM
1

It's not like there's a law against it. Knock yourself out.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:56 PM
5

The people working at Google have a hard time bringing themselves to make a doodle for anything that isn't leftist/sjw. They make doodles for stuff like Ramadan, but put up nothing for Easter. They make doodles for assholes like this : assholes who openly state that they greatly admire people like, "Osama Bin Laden, Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Che Guevara, and convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal." With stuff like this, combined with what they did regarding Damore, and no…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:04 AM
7

Looks like Yokosuka, Japan. There is a joint US/Japanese naval base there.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 09:25 PM
4

School wasn't like that because there was social pressure and the distraction of girls. It's also because 76%+ of school teachers are female.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:49 PM
16

I like how the music seemingly crescendoed for the big climax. "Fuck O<sup>ff</sup><sup>ff</sup><sup>ff...</sup> LOL
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/17 03:07 PM
–

Son of a bitch! This must be that thing they're always talking about. How, guys just end up raping people, even when they don't even know they are. I wasn't even trying to, or anything. I swear...
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:28 PM
–

when there's not enough rape going around it just means The Patriarchy is becoming more effective at stopping women reporting it, and therefore EVEN MORE FUNDS! are needed. Or, alternatively, you just broaden the definition of rape...
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:12 PM
5

God, I would love to see what sort of articles would be published if it were 93% female... Alternatively, can you imagine the "crisis", if the numbers "equalized", even a little? What if it got down to 80% male, and all of a sudden it was 20% female? "We are FAILING our mothers/daughters! Women dying at the workplace is up almost 300%!"
/r/MensRights28/04/17 04:31 PM
7

Yeah! And you're free to start them with like what, ~60% of your prior salary each time? Living EASY!
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:48 PM
2

otoko isn't exactly the word for "man", its the word for "boy". It implies a younger male. Huh? Are we still talking about Japanese, or Chinese? If we're still talking about Japanese (And possibly Chinese as well, but I don't want to make assumptions), this information is completely wrong. Otoko (男) does not mean "boy". That character (男), doesn't contain any information at all about age. It basically just means "male". Maybe you are getting confused by the fact that the romaji for 男 has "ko" in…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:27 PM
10

This is what make the story seem like bs...
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:27 PM
5

It sounds like we need to make resisting arrest - when the officer is female - extra bad. Maybe it can be some sort of international hate crime against women (the suspect isn't just challenging the rule of law, he's challenging the idea that a woman could enforce it), and whenever it occurs, the UN will get involved?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:35 PM
11

The child is accustomed to a certain lifestyle, and shouldn't be expected to live "rough" while with one parent, and "lavishly" with the other. What this system has done, however, is to make it so that once a female has a child with a wealthy male, she has literally ZERO incentive to do anything to keep the relationship with him amicable. Because of this system, (Child with rich person = MASSIVE child support windfall) the woman can basically do whatever she wants (be as lazy as she wants, as an…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:37 PM
9

Only problem, the survey cited includes drunk kissing and kissing that does not conform to the affirmative consent standard in its sexual assault statistics... Why is this a problem? It's only a problem if you care about your statistic being factually true. If all you want to do is perpetuate the belief that women are victims (and thus we need a never ending cycle of legislation to help them), it's fine.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:02 PM
5

I love how it says, "This is a step back for feminism." So, basically, feminism is... keeping males away from younger, thinner, more attractive females? I guess they are finally being honest about modern feminism.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:30 AM
54

Don't see anyone bitching about that. Because males are taught that they are expected to abide by the rules, and that they will be held accountable.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:35 PM
336

This can be translated into: "When you interrupt a girl's school day to force her to change clothes, or send her home because her shorts are too short, or her bra straps are visible, you are telling her that, yes, girls have to abide by the rules, too. Instead of teaching girls that they will be expected to abide by the rules - just as boys are expected to - teach girls that they are above the rules. Just as in later life, females always deserve special consideration."
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:46 PM
11

Feminism will eventually go the same way as racism. There is no other possibility: the history, the ideology, the policies, the immense social harm...short of creating some sort of amazonian femocracy where all critics of feminism are shot on sight, feminism will fall. I really think that people are underestimating how hardwired human beings seem to be to want to help women out. Basically, women have a strong tendency for built-in automatic in-group preference, and men have built-in "women need/…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:40 PM
8

Meanwhile, my son's grade school (in a town with a population of 72k) has one male teacher. ONE. TOTAL. From all grades, K through 5. When is the district going to start enacting a whole bunch of programs to force some of the female teachers out, and get more male teachers in? Oh, wait. That's right. When there aren't enough males in a particular profession, it's just because males don't want to do those jobs. When there aren't enough females in a (desirable - not something that they feel is ben…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:29 PM
5

Un-fucking-believable. This person is honestly who the university thought was going to be a fair and impartial judge? A woman with a master's degree in Women's Studies, who - from all the other stuff she is involved in - clearly has an agenda? Men NEED to start standing up to stuff like this. It has gone BEYOND ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:05 PM
18

Making that sub a default was such bullshit. It was so obvious what was going to happen - that all the radfem types on reddit were going to move in there, and use it as their new soapbox to access a much larger (frontpage) audience - and sure enough, that's exactly what has happened.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:15 PM
6

So stupid and spiteful, they don't even know that now they're fucking themselves. Because they're not. It is so easy for women to talk society into viewing them as perpetual victims that need everyone's help. They will put out a call, everyone will go, "Omg! It's criminal how we are failing these single mothers!", politicians will enact programs, and the money will be extracted from the men that are abstaining from entering into the system of marriage.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:52 AM
8

Taxes/social programs will be set up to pay for it. Just like everything else, women will have choices, and men will have obligations. One way or another, money will be extracted from men.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:49 AM
3

This thing I never understand with people that take this view is: This makes it sound like one partner FORCED the other to abandon their career, and be a stay-at-home parent. How do we know this was the case? How many marriages still exist where the guy is telling the woman, "Shut up! You know what? You are going to quit your job, and take care of the child now." How do we know that the situation wasn't that the male partner really would have preferred some other arrangement, but relented, and a…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:47 PM
119

Isn't that what they want? No. This much should be obvious by now.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:21 PM
3

Because if there is one thing people love to hear, it's that they've been wronged, and that, "We won't put up with this any more! Now is the time that we strike back at our oppressors!" Stuff like this is extremely effective at energizing your base.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:42 PM
17

It's not just that, though. It's the fact that women/feminists/"our seemingly innate biological drive to give women whatever they ask for" allows an already biased system to be even further biased against us, that is so frustrating. Seriously. No matter how obvious it is that women are the ones that receive preferential treatment/status almost everywhere in the western world, not only to people refuse to believe that, they are also so easily manipulated into actually wanting YOU to feel some sor…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:21 AM
2

Not just that, but now that there is a path to getting subs banned, I really wonder how many organized "false flag" operations we are going to see.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:38 PM
9

Feminists are a menace to a free society. For me, the best part is that one of feminism's core tenets is that that society - at every level - is anti-women, and pro-men; however the fact that crazy stuff like this happens PROVES that belief is absolute bullshit. Seriously, if society was anti-women, and men were allowed to just do whatever the f' they wanted, how would a law this crazy exist? How could a "patriarchal society" have passed it??? In a society like that, how would anything have happ…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:37 PM
5

Link: World Cup Women Players Overpaid Compared To Male Counterparts Basically: The men bring in SPECTACTULARLY more revenue: But, the total prize money was 38 times greater for men. Let’s look at total revenue then. The figures aren’t currently available for the 2015 Women’s World Cup, though we can compare the 2011 Women’s event and the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. In 2011 the Women’s World Cup hosted in Germany had earnings of $72,818,500. The South Africa World Cup in 2010, had sales of $…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:04 PM
3

Feminists actually believe that men and women are exactly the same. Feminists actually believe that men and women are exactly the same, except for all the ways in which women are better.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:19 PM
4

This. You can't fight feminists with facts. You can't fight something that is based on "the feels" with logic. They are just going to counter with something along the lines of, "Men are in control of businesses/'The Patriarchy', so it's their fault that sponsorship levels for The Women's World Cup lags, and that that lag in sponsorship causes the women to not get their rightful equal pay."
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:40 PM
6

Imagine a world where you could randomly kick the crap out of, say, Mike Tyson and then sue him when he popped you on the nose in self-defense. It's not hard. You just need to imagine being a woman. Hell, if you don't want to risk hitting him, you can just accuse Mike of rape. That works(ed), too.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:31 PM
2

You can try asking them, but I'm guessing no.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:49 PM
5

And if a male had done this to a female?
/r/PussyPass29/06/15 07:42 PM
21

“Ms. P hit Mr. W on the head with a frying pan two times … four of the assailants, including the co-accused, rolled him over, and one of the assailants removed his pants and sodomized him with a mop handle.” Even in Canada, if someone had done (or had taken part in having done) those 3 things: Hitting someone in the head with a frying pan. Forcibly removing that someone's clothing. Penetrating that someone with a mop handle. to a female (especially one that was innocent of what they thought they…
/r/PussyPass29/06/15 07:38 PM
3

I did. That name makes it so difficult to accept this isn't some sort of piece from The Onion...
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:46 PM
8

Not only this, but another great version of the example would be : The guy gets permission to use the car to drive to the store to pickup some groceries, so he can make dinner for them. Guy does that, uses the car without any issues, and makes them dinner. Three weeks later, the guy is called into the Dean's office, where he is informed that he is being thrown out of college (and maybe even arrested for grand theft) because the woman changed her mind, and retroactively revoked her permission to …
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:07 PM
23

And on top of this, they still pretend like something like "The Patriarchy" exists. Huh? If the world really was this giant boys club, and everyone truly was biased against females, how in the hell would something like this - what has happened to Hunt - happen? Seriously. If things really were like they pretend they are, and society's default position was to be anti-women, wouldn't anything this Hunt guy said have basically been seen a non-issue? I.E., if he was just saying what feminists are te…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:06 PM
2

They know. They absolutely freaking know. This is female privilege. Knowing that you can openly attack someone WAY bigger than you, and knowing that even if that person should choose to defend themselves against your attack (which, most of the time, they won't), that you will instantly have other strangers running to your defense, even though you were the aggressor. Then, when the police show up, you turn on the tear faucet, and get the police on your side with the, "Hee hit meeeeee!" stuff. The…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:19 PM
7

But, this didn't make any sense. The guy was seen playing with the kid. Then, when the cops showed up, the child - of his own will - latched onto the guy's leg. It should have been fairly obvious that they knew each other.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:13 PM
3

...and then eat the flaming cookies. That would be such an awesome display of how hardcore you are about cookies. Ain't nothing going to stop you from getting them! Not her lying about their f'ing existence! Not even them being on goddamn FIRE! ArRRRHHGGHH!
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:52 PM
2

Well, you ungrateful pig with your cushy job, how about getting off your fat lazy ass and supporting these men the way they once had supported you? This isn't how the world (or "The Patriarchy") works. Females are judged based on their youth/looks. Men are judged based on how much stuff they can get for society, their wife, their family. A man that cannot adequately "get stuff" for a woman/family, very rapidly has his maleness/worth called into question.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:43 PM
2

Did you also know that, in French, "LeBron" means, "The Bron". :D
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:21 PM
6

It doesn't matter what you call us. It only matters how easily it is for them to paint us as "against women", "misogynists", "redpillers", whatever.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:18 PM
2

I think this is the most insidious thing about the whole system - the fact that women, as a whole - now, and probably always - wield way more influence/power than anyone admits, but that they do this in a "soft" way, sort of "from the shadows". And, that - in doing it that way - they are able to not only secure that power, but that they are able to make their position as victims basically unassailable. Seriously. I don't think a lot of women/feminists know what it's like to grow up as a male. To…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:02 PM
2

I don't think it was their voting majority that got these sorts of programs passed. It's the fact that women are able to influence their husbands, sons, male friends very readily/easily. Seriously - anyone pretending that women, even before they had the "right to vote", don't wield an enormous amount of influence/power over males, is so intellectually dishonest, it's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:53 PM
7

I am sick and tired of this type of crap. When are we going to start fighting back? I think I've finally arrived at the conclusion (not because of this particular case) that it simply can't be done. It seems fairly obvious that males are evolutionarily programmed to see girls/women as something "fairer" - that is automatically worthy of compassion/protection - and that women are programmed to be strongly biased towards siding with other women by default (without considering any logic/arguments).…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:46 PM
151

White women are now pretty much the most privileged/protected "class" that has ever existed.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:44 PM
4

Most damaging for Sousa was the Community Safety Alert that the university sent via email days after the complaint notifying the students of the assault and naming Sousa as the alleged suspect. "[San Diego State] could have at least researched the case and investigated the girl’s claims and not rushed to conclusions," said Sousa in a May 8 interview. "There was definitely no need to send a mass email with my name to every student before neither conducting a proper investigation nor giving me the…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:28 PM
2

I think it's stupid/ridiculous. There are toys that boys generally enjoy more than girls, and vice versa. Amazon wasn't preventing parents from buying whatever they wanted for their particular child. All it was doing was trying to be helpful in presenting lists of toys that - in general - might be more applicable to boys/girls. If someone's child was a special case, the parent needed (and was completely able) to search with that particular child in mind. All they had to do was not click that che…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:19 PM
3

This is the real danger when you have people like Obama, and Hillary using that fake "statistic" for political pandering. If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes "The Truth" - especially when the public hears it coming from people with positions of power.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:47 PM
5

If anyone can honestly convince themselves that a large part of modern feminism isn't older and/or unattractive women raging against a biological "system" that makes it so that young pretty girls coast through life - in a way that they could only hope to do so (getting every benefit of the doubt, every second/third/fourth chance, having everyone instantly throw themselves at them willing to help, etc.) - they are delusional. Seriously. It is so blatantly obvious, it's sheer intellectual dishones…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:45 PM
6

I just honestly don't know if you can reform someone that spent a whole bunch of time planning out something as horrible as this. Seriously - if she had been successful, she would have absolutely destroyed her (ex) husband completely. I think you have to be really messed up to think doing something like that to someone would be ok.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 10:04 PM
18

That quote plus the, "This case is a very disturbing case. You know... This young woman, she needs some HELP", that lead into your quote was a real winner, too. Yeah... this poor young woman. She - in an obviously extremely calculating and pre-meditated manner - tried doing something, where - if she had been successful - her husband would have been doing some SERIOUS time. Being found guilty of a violent rape? He wouldn't have just been "kicked out of his home". He would have had his entire life…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:05 PM
9

People are drinking til they get absolutely plowed, and then hanging out with other people that are crazy drunk. Then they both engage in sex (again, BOTH of them being drunk), but only one gets attacked/expelled for being a rapist the next day. I couldn't care less about the drinking part. I agree with you that people (BOTH sexes) should be free to make whatever decisions they want. I couldn't care less about the having sex part (in an of itself), either. The part I DO care about is the fact th…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:19 PM
9

"Yeah! WTF?! I'm supposed to be FREE to do whatever I want! We fought for women's liberation! If something turns out in a manner that I don't like, the government is supposed to fix it for ME!"
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:48 PM
6

Bullshit?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:04 PM
10

Why would they do that, though? Picking the more advantageous of those - when the time/situation dictates it - seems to work really well for them.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:08 PM
23

Women always seem to have "options". We get obligations.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:03 PM
7

Even with those criteria, there is no fucking way you could arrive at a "100%" level. The only way I can feasibly see reaching that is by making the threshold be something like, "Have you been in a car in which a male was present?" Man - I know that French men have a reputation for their sexual prowess, but the fact that they can sexually harass a woman just with their mere presence is nothing short of spectacular. French men must seriously have their shit together.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:15 PM
8

Wow. 100-freaking-percent? This is spectacular. How in the hell are French men managing to be so thorough? Do they tag the ones that they have already harassed, so they can find the ones that they have not? Have they coded up some sort of (multi-platform) cellphone App (with facial recognition) to help them with this? Is it that they have they compiled a list of every woman known to travel by train, and they then go around - with a clipboard - canvassing each car, harassing each woman, and then …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:14 PM
6

This makes me rage so hard: And that myth has given rise to a stupendously expensive campus bureaucracy tasked with increasing diversity and combating alleged faculty bias. Last month, the University of California at Los Angeles hired its first vice chancellor for equity, diversity, and inclusion at the jaw-dropping salary of $354,900 — enough to cover the tuition of nearly 30 underprivileged students a year. That vice chancellor will be expected to ride herd on the faculty and make sure that it…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:33 PM
12

If there is a stay-at-home spouse/parent, they should be supported for the loss of income during the marriage. Why? This is a commonly held belief, and it's something I never understand. Thinking this way makes it sound like - when one party is a stay at home parent - it's because they were forced into becoming one by the other. Why isn't it assumed that the stay at home person had some agency, and that they should also have to shoulder some of the risk that came along with that decision? I just…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:28 PM
10

Now we await the, "Sexist IT companies won't hire a woman who's not afraid to put her opinion out there!" article...
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:54 PM
15

What disgusts me is not just the fact that they pretend like the result that has been achieved (i.e., actual discrimination!) is a good thing, it's that: They act surprised at this discovery. You spend decades wielding governmental power in an attempt to create a system in which women are advantaged over men (I'm not just talking about STEM), and you're going to act surprised when you find out that that's actually happening? Even though their study has shown that this bullshit has directly cause…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:37 PM
8

No... The difference is that they want to use the power of the state to treat those who don't share their agenda this way.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:44 PM
126

The gear and the mission won't change just because you throw some split tails in the mix. Don't worry. The enemy will be instructed to take it easier on the units that have women (who couldn't meet the original higher standards) in them. If they fail to abide by this, they will face the wrath of the SJW Brigade, and they don't want none of that.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:06 PM
65

They won't make it. And that means that they will get horrible evals because they aren't bearing the same burden men are. This is where you are wrong. They will get horrible evals because those evals are unfairly targeting women. They obviously need to be changed. What's that? You don't think they need to be changed? Why are you against helping women??? Are you a misogynist????
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:04 PM
-3

I'm always weary of statistics like this. It seems that there is a reasonably high likelihood that the Pornhub stats are a sequitur, as it could just be that, of the women that go looking for pron on the internet, those are more likely to be into that sort of porn. It's always the same thing with school shooters, and violent video games. I.e., a high percentage of them are later found to have been super into violent video games, and the media wants to use that to prove, "Teh violent video games …
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:43 PM
3

You see? This is you not checking your privilege, d00d. You are afforded the choice of avoiding running at times that make you feel uncomfortable. "The Patriarchy" does not allow them that choice. They have to go out there when The Patriarchy says, and that's it! CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE!!!!1! (Also, avert your gaze, and cross the street.)
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:31 PM
1

I think this is why their experiment is sort of lacking - the girl they used is young, and super attractive (lacking, unless all they are trying to prove is that society is very "accommodating" to young, attractive girls...) I feel like the bystanders would have been more likely to act against a slightly older, less pretty girl.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:59 PM
2

I doubt that is going to work as well as you envision... Bully: "Oh look! Someone sounds like they are an EXPERT on what, and who, is gay! I wonder why that is..." :)
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:43 PM
64

No. Didn't you see the way the article was titled? "Ellen Pao Trial Sends Shockwaves through Silicon Valley", dude. Seriously. Almost every single article I've seen is some flavor of that same spin. Basically, she might not have won, and she might be a piece of shit, but this was a WAKE UP CALL! And, and, EVERYBODY BETTER RECOGNIZE!!1! RAWRR, GRRRL PWR!11!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/15 02:49 PM
3

I love how the picture they have of the victim (DiCaprio), in the first article, is one where he is menacingly sitting there with a gun... She was obviously justified in "proactively-defending" herself from a guy as dangerous as this.
/r/PussyPass24/03/15 04:11 PM
1

How can one tell anything from the small amount of time these charts are depicting? According to Wikipedia, "Gamergate" started ramping up after August 2014. These charts only show from December '14 to March '15. Due to the fact that these charts are showing so limited an amount of time, it's entirely possible that there are multiple explanations for the drop off shown here, including, but not limited to: "Gamergate" actually caused a massive spike in their readership, and as the controversy/sto…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:31 PM
9

Come on, Man... I absolutely think that certain types of people are more likely to become teachers, and unfortunately these types of anti-boy, "Yeah! GRRRRL Power!", are heavily featured in the education system. I do NOT think they are meeting together, and trying to execute some sort of organized plan to "enslave" males. Let's not be ridiculous. It just makes us easier to dismiss.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:39 PM
10

It's funny, I've wondered whether or not this sort of thing is the answer to the Fermi Paradox. For those that haven't heard of it, the basic idea of the Fermi Paradox is that: The sun isn't that old, but already has a planet that supports life. There are billions of stars in the known universe that are billions of years older than the sun. Even if if only a "small" percentage of those stars have (or have had) inhabitable planets, and even if only "slow" space travel is possible, with the univer…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 04:11 PM
8

Disgusting. Honest, but disgusting.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:15 AM
18

Is there some important context we're missing? Yes. The same one that is present with all these sorts of laws. Apparently, a woman's life is inherently more valuable.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:40 PM
1

I was referring to the various countries' national debts.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:39 PM
9

they cant do that in this day and age, you cant have a gender specific law penalising single men LOL. Yeah! There is absolutely NO way they would make laws that single out men, in the name of protecting women! Wait a minute...
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:31 PM
10

In what fucking world does that make their irresponsibility my problem? This one, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:26 PM
15

Now you've got it.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:00 PM
4

But if you make it a place goys like to go, then girls won't like it as much, and then we'd be failing girls! A country not doing absolutely everything it can to promote its daughters is a travesty! Why don't you care about girls? Why do you want them to fail?! (This is why it's so hard to get anything done for boys/men. Because it is SO easy to campaign like this...)
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:28 PM
12

It's not just that (that reversing the genders would upset her), it's the fact that I seriously doubt she is ever out there telling women that they need to face the consequences of their actions: You had sex, and got pregnant? Sorry, no abortion/adoption/baby-drop-box/forcing the unwilling father into paying. You took the risk of having sex, now you have to face the consequences. You got drunk, and went to the frat party where there were other drunken people (males) incapable of making good deci…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:08 PM
2

Maybe we are all wrong here... Maybe this was some fucking MASTER level roleplaying, and it wasn't her that felt this way. It was the way her character felt.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:22 PM
1

Yes, but what you have to consider is that "Bigby's Crushing Hand of Patriarchially Enforced Unrealistic Body Image" has the capability to crush the hopes and dreams of a large percentage of half the total population. How many people can you (realistically) grope with "Bigby's Groping Hand", without having to dedicate an inordinate portion of your time to it? "Bigby's Crushing Hand of Patriarchially Enforced Unrealistic Body Image" is (several orders of magnitude) more insidious, d00d.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:04 PM
3

I'll french kiss an ochre jelly. Hmm... What sort of saving throws are we talking about here?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:00 PM
3

Let us also not forget, "Melf's Misogynistic Arrow", and "Bigby's Crushing Hand of Patriarchially Enforced Unrealistic Body Image".
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:35 PM
19

I would point to the door and say "You can leave now." "Did you hear that? Oh dear. This is rather... unfortunate." "Look - we would really like to continue to have you in our group, but it seems that - as fate would have it - this year had to be the year that the Tarrasque chose to awake. Unfortunately, being the tallest in the party (Please don't blame me. You were the one that wanted to run with that), you were the first thing that caught its eye, and it has devoured you." "Fortunately - for …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:43 PM
12

Man this is good stuff. Stuff that, with someone like her at the session, no one would get to say/enjoy. And feminists wonder why guys don't want them at their gaming groups... Edit: I wanted to add my suggestions for: Scepter of the Shitlord +2, and the Amulet of (Pretty Much Instant) Mansplaining (also +2, of course. That +1 garbage is for those that are not privileged enough). Honestly, I think this sort of thing would make her so mad - the fact that it's so stereotypical that the male charac…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:54 PM
42

God, this person sounds like an asshole. She sounds exactly like what one would imagine someone like this would sound like. It just amazes me how her manner of speech immediately tells you what sort of person she is. "I just want it noted that... I recognize a certain... irony that..."? Huh? "You want it noted"???! Look - you're not a sergeant that just had his crazy ass captain order them to fix bayonets, and charge the dual machine gun emplacements (with interlocking fields of fire) across the…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:59 PM
15

But then she goes right on, in the same statement, and says that women hold no institutional power... Yeah, it's not like women (feminists in particular) don't have a virtual stranglehold on the institution known as "education", and it's not like every single human has to go through that institution, giving them a very good "opportunity" to program everyone, making everyone more sympathetic to their agenda. I'm so freaking tired of hearing that women have no institutional power.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:43 PM
1

Seriously. It amazes me that people are seemingly unable to sniff this stuff out.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:18 PM
7

That's always one of my favorite examples of the hypocrisy / intellectual dishonesty. Female has sex that results in a child she doesn't want? Society affords them the following "choices": Abortion Adoption Safe-Haven (Baby drop box) Male has sex that results in a child he doesn't want? Society affords him the following choices: Choices??!! You already had your choice when you chose to have sex! Now it's time for you to live with that decision, and "man-up". The other great one is the the classi…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:07 PM
8

Not to fit assumptions, but agendas.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:29 PM
16

Not only was she assaulting a minor, but she also inserted her finger into his mouth (penetration), and tore off some of his clothing. If a guy had done these things to a female minor, (On top of the fact that nearly ever single person there would have immediately jumped to her defense, and basically lynched the guy), he would have faced MUCH more serious charges - i.e, probably some form of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:01 PM
6

There was no "shitty lawyering" here. When someone tries to kill you, you don't have to hire a lawyer and prosecute them. The government goes after them on your behalf. They (the prosecution), and the judge are the ones that let her get away with this.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:33 PM
12

The funniest part is that he actually hits on this point (unintentionally): Almost nothing is more private in our culture than sexual relations. I certainly think it is a bad idea, legally as well as culturally, to incentivize surreptitious videotaping of any kind, let alone of sexual encounters.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:27 PM
2

Unfortunately, going by Japan's abysmal record with regards to parental child abduction, it is extremely unlikely that they have any intention in enforcing this treaty in the way that someone would imagine a signatory would be enforcing it. First off, just a little as a little background on how things work in Japan, with regards to "shared custody" - there is basically no such thing. In Japan, when a couple gets divorced, one side gets the children, and that's basically it. If they are on good t…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:46 PM
2

"A male approached a female from the opposite direction, and came up within several feet of her personal space." "The male did not say anything, or make physical contact with the female." Several feet??!!!! HOLY SHIT!!! We better get this son-of-a-bitch off the streets, before something happens! LOL I swear, you can't make this stuff up!
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:12 PM
8

Come on, man. The fact that she was 11 when this happened does have some weight here. We don't throw the book at 11 year olds. To me, the bigger piece of this story is that it probably needs to be a little bit more difficult to convict a guy of something like this. I know that, with something like rape, it's already pretty difficult to prove that it happened, but to take away someone's life, and lock them up for 10+ years, it seems like we should have a higher standard than just an 11 year old's…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:35 PM
8

An absolute joke. Can anyone honestly say - with a straight face - that a guy that assaulted a 17 year old girl, ripped her clothing off, and stuck his fingers in her mouth, would have gotten two years of "accelerated probation", complete with his record being cleared upon completion? No. Freaking. Way. It amazes me how this sort of stuff hasn't run into Constitutional challenges, yet? There is no way both sexes are receiving "equal protection under the law".
/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:50 PM
6

Men's football is loved in Britain simply because the players are men, and men like watching other men play football, and what men like to do and like to watch is, de facto, culturally important. Yes. This is definitely why people (not just men, but women, too) choose to watch the male version of whatever sport - just because it's men. It couldn't possibly be because men are evolutionarily selected to be more athletic, thus making male sports (which, probably not coincidentally, happen to involv…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:11 PM
4

This is absolutely female privilege. As everyone else has been pointing out, there is no way a guy (even if he was super small/scrawny) could have assaulted a 16 year old girl (ripping off her shirt, sticking his fingers in her mouth - like she did), and gotten off as lightly as she has/will. Any guy that did that would have been absolutely brutalized by bystanders and police, and then had much heavier charges levied against him. Society definitely allows females the privilege to attack males wi…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:30 PM
10

Poised: The 34-year-old Utah woman no longer teaches at the school. Her husband filed for divorce in November shortly after her arrest I love how they describe her as "Poised". I could totally see them captioning the photo of a male teacher (accused of the same thing - raping a student) like that. Totally.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:33 AM
2

In response, I'll repost something that I posted there (in support of someone that was making reasonable comments/criticism, but getting downvoted into obscurity nonetheless): I love how you have done nothing to be offensive, unreasonable, un-polite, etc., but your comment is being downvoted into oblivion (and is likely at risk of being outright deleted altogether), regardless. This is the problem that a lot of people, who are not from this subbreddit, have with the fact that this place has been…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:10 PM
4

I wonder if this is why they have decided to take over /r/TwoXChromosomes. Man - ever since that place got defaulted, it has become unbelievably radicalized. I still think it's absolutely ridiculous that they have been gifted unfettered access to broadcast their message to the front page. I wouldn't have as big a problem with it if people were allowed to post counterpoints over there, but any sort of comment that doesn't toe the party line, basically gets deleted by the mods.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:54 PM
0

I think this is most likely just a joke (whether or not you want to think it's a bad one, is up to you). They are just poking fun at the idea of a pill that combines: stronger/leaner + wanting more sex. Come on, guys. Let's not turn into "them", by looking for misandry in everything we see. “He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster . . . when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you” -- Friedrich Nietzsche
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:47 PM
5

The world is a better place because there are people like you in it. This. The world has a severe shortage of "people who are willing to do the right thing, even when doing it might negatively impact them". The more people like you, the better. Don't let anyone convince you that you were the party in the wrong here.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:58 PM
2

If you think I'm a troll, go ahead and look back through my comment history. You're way off base on this. You're being a dbag.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:49 PM
-1

If you are going to put direct quotation marks around something like that, and then just write, "This message brought to you by the feminist movement", it makes it sound like this is a verbatim quote from the article. If he wrote something like: So, basically, what the author is saying is: "Women should be able to do whatever they want. But, society has no right to expect women to have responsibilities - reaponsibility and accountability is a man's job." This message brought to you by the femini…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:29 PM
11

Come on, man... The guy is a musician. He likes to walk into, and right up next to, the crowd. When he does this, it is a common occurrence that some ladies try to grab his dong. He's asking why this isn't seen in the same light as males trying to grope female musicians.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:48 PM
1

"Women should be able to do whatever they want. But, society has now right to expect women to have responsibilities - reaponsibility and accountability is a man's job." This woman said a whole bunch of ridiculous stuff, but I can't find this particular quote anywhere in the article. Why do you have quotation marks around it? We don't need to be making shit up.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:34 PM
3

Holy Shit, those must have been a rough 35 years! Are they sure they got the age of this woman right?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:28 AM
22

This type of attitude towards Men and Boys can not be allowed to become normalised. It has already has...
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:34 PM
57

This guy is a big fat faker! I thought that survey proved that we were all hyper right wing, atheist, pot smokers?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:44 PM
15

That being said, Male Genital mutilation is practice in most countries in the world, including many first world nations. That's why I consider it to be a more pressing matter. Hundred of millions of boys have their genitals mutilated each year, compared to only a couple million girls. ::SIGH:: Obviously you didn't read the article. The author specifically addresses this point: "Too often it has gone under the name of "female circumcision", which makes it sound as innocuous as what's done to baby…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:04 PM
11

The Obama Administration/The Democratic Party knows it's bullshit, too. Honestly, I think this move by Obama/The Democratic Party was incredibly calculating - even more so than just "normal" pandering. By making this an issue they have: Automatically gotten a bunch of political return by just bringing it up. Regardless of the fact that it's...NOT TRUE, most Feminists believe this line anyway, and tons of women would like to believe it. Feminists thrive on viewing women as victims. Basically forc…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:50 PM
3

NEws and govt leave off "OVER A LIFETIME" so people end up thinking its an hourly rate. I wonder why they do this...
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:40 PM
10

How does one close a gap that doesn't exist? Oh, come now.... Just because it doesn't exist, doesn't mean that you can't make a big deal about it, try to force a bunch of legislation through, and reap the political benefits of some big time pandering. Basically, we need equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. If women - who make decisions that cause them to earn less - aren't making as much as men - who make decisions that cause them to earn more - obviously we are failing our daughter…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:24 PM
12

This is why it is going to be SO hard for the MR crowd to gain any momentum/traction - feminists have the the entire (Western) world set up to: Always view females as the victims, who need to be protected. View men who "complain" about something as weak/bad. This, combined with the fact that they absolutely dominate all levels of education - which gives them (at the very least) the opportunity to indoctrinate all young people to their beliefs, means that: Not only do they control the dialogue, t…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:03 AM
10

Laughable is not the word I would choose to describe it. I would go with disgusting. Honestly - I cannot believe this is posted - in an official capacity - on any college's website.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 06:20 PM
5

Dang... I did not expect "The Goblin King" to be so ripped.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:14 PM
13

Last I checked there is not such crime as "psychological rape" There is now.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:23 PM
46

Turn yourself in? If you are really lucky, the tribunal will have mercy on you.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:23 PM
4

The response shouldn't be violence. You can terminate the the relationship without resorting to acting like an imbecile/brute. Even if you don't see this as a moral issue, you should be able to see that hitting her is only going to give her all the ammunition she needs to utterly destroy you with the legal system.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 07:08 PM
-1

How in the hell does something as crazy as this get upvoted? Jesus.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 05:03 PM
1

It's like this almost everywhere in the world. WHO Statistics on Suicide by Gender
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:56 PM
1

It will inspire terrify her into taking his wants seriously. This depends on whether or not children exist. Dread game is toothless when the woman can simply leave with the children, house, and money.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 05:37 AM
10

It's just amazing to me that what he said is controversial at all. Unless we are talking about a drunk guy physically assaulting a woman, and forcibly raping her - in which case, no one - including the author - is arguing that the male hasn't obviously committed a crime - I don't see how one can argue that: BOTH people got drunk. BOTH people did so, despite the fact that they BOTH knew that their decision making would be impaired. Sex that either one (or both) parties later regretted (after they…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:30 PM
69

She drops this one on us, as well: I can offer my unconditional support and belief to all women who come forward to say they have been raped or abused. How can you give "unconditional support and belief" to someone at the point where they have merely said that they have been raped or abused? It's incredible how unbelievably intellectually dishonest you have to be to basically come out and say that, "It is my belief that the someone of the female sex never has, and never will lie." It sure seems …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:19 PM
5

Not trying to sound like a dick, but isn't "wandering eye"? I hope I haven't been wrong about this my whole life...
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 05:17 PM
10

Because, if they did that, it would deter other people from making false rape reports.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:38 PM
1

It might not be accurate, but it sure does tend to win your side a lot of votes. And, hey, let's be honest here. That's what's really important.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:28 PM
65

Who are you to devaule her feelings?! She feels those things! It follows then that they must be true! Who gives a shit about your stupid "facts" and "evidence"?
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 02:50 PM
4

Amazing how that works. Male doesn't follow court order to make child support / alimony payments -> income is basically confiscated, or thrown in jail. Female doesn't follow court order to allow male access to child -> nothing happens. F'ing patriarchy! We need equality NOW!
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:59 PM
5

Here's what you guys need to realize. Anyone who uses the gender of the arguer as a counter-argument cannot be persuaded. It's fucking hopeless. No matter what you say or do, if you are a man and you aren't towing the line, then you are using your privilege or mansplaining and thus your argument can be dismissed. You bring facts and studies to the argument? Who gives a shit? You are a man, you are wrong because the argument doesn't fit in their worldview. This. This woman sounds like an absolute…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:36 AM
2

Colin Cowherd is such a douche. There is no one more arrogant/conceited/obnoxious in all of radio. The guy even looks annoying: Exhibit A
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:32 PM
3

You can say what you want, but you keep your damn hands and any extension thereof, to yourself. Especially bodily fluids. Ick.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:13 AM
6

And the male party? He magically gets those wasted years back?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:26 AM
10

Instead of sharing the misery we've decided that she should not face any significant change and he should bear the responsibility for making sure that happens. This pretty much sums up how ridiculous marriage has become for men - men are expected to assume all the risk. Seriously - what risk do women assume in a marriage? If there are no children, and she's still working, her life has just returned the previous state. If there are no children, and she's not working (and - if there are no childre…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:24 PM
1

“There’s no easy answer as to what’s legal and what isn’t legal,” says Marcia Greenberger, copresident of the National Women’s Law Center. Even so, the continuing practice of admissions departments is worrying, says Emily Martin, deputy director of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project. “It raises questions about punishing girls for their success.” and Our generation of empowered girls has grown up to expect and deserve that admissions officers evaluate both genders on an equal plane based on individu…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:15 PM
5

male-bodied men I think it's fairly obvious what "type" of person the one who used this phrase is. Knowing that, I'm going to assume he/she uses "male-bodied men" not to make fun of smaller guys, but to single out actual men (and not transgendered females who merely identify as men) as the subject of her ire. Seriously - this man/woman is close to coming off as an almost too perfect caricature of your stereotypical hyper-feminist.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:21 PM
17

In colleges around the country, the story is even worse: back in my day, more than a third of all computer science degrees were awarded to women; today, it's a disappointing 12 percent. And, ironically, among high school students, girls are more likely to be generally computer literate than boys (although boys are more likely, three-to-two, to have actually done computer programming). Clearly, things are going in the wrong direction. What's going on here? Why are women steering clear of technolo…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 04:59 PM
5

The judge determined that because he was not married to the mother that he was not considered the presumed father. Yeah - I'm sure this line of reasoning would have held if they were trying to get child support / alimony out of the guy. The current legal system - with regards to men and family matters - is an absolute JOKE.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:35 AM
1

The question is, "Where is he taking all of it, and what is he planning..."
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:44 PM
7

This sort of thing already happens. If a divorced man loses his job after alimony/child support is already determined, and he can't find a similar paying job, he's still held liable for the previously determined amount. They don't lower the payments because he can't find any (or equal) work. Of course, if he gets a better job, the support payments go up...
/r/TheRedPill19/11/13 06:32 PM
38

Sounds like someone needs to check his privilege. We are still the first that get to go die in the event that there is a war. That's right! Back of the line, women!
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:55 PM
8

This. It's so sad how this guy is trying to do the right thing for his daughter, and he thinks things are just going to magically work out ok as soon as she moves out. The court isn't going to care that he stuck around for his daughter's sake. All the judge is going to see is that he stuck around for 4+ years after the wife's infidelity, and interpret it as not having been that big of a deal. This, combined with the wife most likely spinning things as, "Our last child just moved out, and now he'…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 04:51 AM
1

I think you're assuming in the 1950s men didn't cheat and prior to that it wasn't socially acceptable for men to cheat... I don't have stats. Only my grandparents anecdotes, but women put up with a lot more then because the dynamics weren't set up so that they could leave and easily provide for themselves as most workplaces were hostile to women and openly discouraged it. I agree with this 100%. Back then, women had the raw end of the deal. It wasn't easy for them to work, and if the husband dec…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 10:05 PM
10

But she did it! Didn't you see?! Everyone cheered, and she was validated!
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:39 PM
18

It's a definite possibility. Crazed feminists (and other people with their own agendas - let's not be intellectually dishonest, there are a lot of crazy ass people, in general), who have it out for certain individuals, pull stuff like this all the time. Anyone familiar with the the /r/MensRights sub, will probably be familiar with GirlWritesWhat (for those that aren't, she's basically a woman that is extremely sympathetic with men). This same thing basically happened to her. She posts her stuff …
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 11:37 PM
0

Said no to a woman? Misogynist, clearly. This woman sounds like an ass, but I doubt the, "I think you're a misogynistic ass hole", comment came out of only this interaction. She is mostly likely pissed because of the rest of the content on the Return of Kings site.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 11:22 PM
4

She doesn't need to specifically ask for murder for it to happen in cases like this. The mere allegation has been reason enough for it to happen. (Note: In the linked story, the allegation was also false.)
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:37 AM
12

This should honestly almost be attempted murder. That could easily be the outcome of what she's done.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:32 AM
2

And maybe I would agree with you if female erotica/fantasy didn't feature young girl/older guy stories so heavily. They aren't the majority but they are one of the staple fantasies. This is a pretty good point. However, I think a lot of it can be explained away by the fact that it is - like you say - a fantasy. A fantasy of a time when they were more desirable.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 03:25 AM
2

You also seem to misunderstand what "sexual attraction" is: Women don't "biologically" prefer "resources". Sexual attraction is sexual attraction and as a woman, I don't know any woman who is sexually attracted to money. Sexual attraction is not this logical/emotional thing. Sexual attraction is - at its most basic level - being "attracted" to that which will most likely result in you passing on your genes. This doesn't sound nice/romantic, and we can pretend like it isn't the case, but at the l…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 10:20 PM
3

You are not understanding how evolution/biology works. Evolution/biology isn't about sitting around, and thinking about the best, "most efficient" way of doing things. Organisms don't control their own destiny (We - humans - are a special case, and we might now, but originally, we didn't). Giraffes, for example, don't have long necks because "evolution"/giraffes sat around and thought, "You know, if we had longer necks, we could reach the food that was up higher - food that no other animal can t…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 09:53 PM
51

Honestly, I don't think they would. Women realize that - on a biological level - they absolutely cannot compete with girls. Thus, they must do everything possible to make sure that there is as much societal shame/pressure associated with young girl / older male relationships as possible. If this stigma doesn't exist, they are the ones left without a seat when the music stops.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 08:49 PM
2

Write down...
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:05 AM
3

"Right down what you want..." Come on, man...
/r/MensRights28/10/13 09:37 PM
5

This is the very reason that MR stuff will have an extremely tough time gaining any sort traction in western society - feminists (and those that are sympathetic to their cause) control the "system"/establishment. From politics, to the education system, to the media, they control the dialogue. That they absolutely dominate primary and secondary education, allows them the chance to basically program/indoctrinate all children to their views, and their ways of thinking. This then predisposes a great…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:46 PM
1

I'm saying that he obviously does not want this relationship (if he did, he wouldn't be suing to have it terminated). As the only reason the relationship exists at all is because his ex-wife defrauded him, the court should have no reason to force him to continue it. What if the guy wants to have his "own" children, and now he cannot afford to start up a new relationship with a different woman because a good portion of his income is going towards this one? How in the hell is that fair?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:52 PM
3

If you have a loving paternal relationship with a child, crude facts about genetics shouldn't get in the way of that. The woman defrauded him - that is the only reason he became these particular children's' father. Whether or not he wants to continue that relationship (and all the obligations that entails) should be his decision. If he wants to do that, that's wonderful. If he doesn't, the court should not be forcing him to. He was the victim of fraud!
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:04 PM
2

Don't forget my favorite - that a woman can voluntarily give up all parental obligations, in whichever manner she feels more comfortable with (abortion, adoption, surrender), but a man will always be held accountable for 18+ years of support. In other words, if sex results in a child: Said to men: "You don't want to be a father? Too bad. You knew that having sex could result in a child. If you weren't willing to accept that, you shouldn't have had sex." Said to women: "You don't want to be a mot…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:54 PM
25

Why must arguments be taken to the extreme like this? Why? Because, in the eyes of the law, we are all supposed to be treated equally. It is not equal treatment if one sex is legally given all sort of outs, and the other is always held responsible. Both sexes know the risks of engaging in sexual intercourse. Either both should be held responsible, or neither should.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:40 PM
48

Then your moral compass should also be requiring women - except in the case that there is extreme risk to her life - to cary all fetuses to term, and then be jointly responsible for supporting them (no abortion; no adoption; no legal surrender). After all, women too know that, if they engage in sex, a baby may be the result. If they don't want to be responsible for a baby, they shouldn't have sex, right?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:22 PM
1

It's that, considering the large amount of pull, resources and members that one of Australia's TWO biggest parties couldn't find (as this thread would have it), women suitable for the positions. The whole point people are trying to make is that he's not supposed to be, "finding women suitable for the positions". The goal should be to find "the most suitable person for any given position." If that person ends up being a woman, great. If it ends up being a man, great. Gender should not be playing …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:46 PM
70

I could honestly see them doing something to attempt to force that - making laws where, if a female officer is involved, and you resist arrest or injure the officer, the penalties are higher. In fact, that sounds exactly like something they would try to push through.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:48 PM
4

Yeah, unfortunately that's not how it works. If the teacher/professor in question is already tenured, they are extremely difficult to get rid of. I had a professor in college (she was teaching a Criminal Justice 101 type class) that was: Openly sexist Openly racist (reverse-racism, if you want to call it that) Combative Habitually late (She was extremely late to our freaking final exam! Pay attention to how many times students mention this exact issue in the reviews that follow.) Obviously marke…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:29 PM
1

The way this should work is that employers should be required to withhold a special tax from only female workers (just like disability, unemployment, social security, or whatever). The important part is that this will only be withheld from women employees. Then, when women miss work for their unique reasons, they can make claims just like people do for disability/unemployment, and no one will have to be mad. Men are never going to call in sick because of menstrual issues. There is no reason they…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:34 AM
6

And, if we're talking about you being in a situation similar to this guy, you'd be giving her exactly what she wants - all the ammunition she would need to completely, and utterly destroy you.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:15 PM
1

And not only that, but - statistically - you will most likely die sooner than her, so she will get to enjoy more of it, as well. F'ing male privilege.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:04 PM
1

I think yours is a very good comment. The pension thing is component of the, "men compromise a ridiculous percentage of workplace deaths" issue, that I've never even thought about. This makes the issue seem even more outrageous to me. Basically, not only are: Men vilified for "making 23 cents more" for ever dollar a woman makes. Men doing so largely because they work more hours, and work far more dangerous jobs Men sacrificing their "lives" (by working more hours, they have less time for doing o…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:34 PM
1

I would speculate that it is a combination of a several factors, including (but obviously not limited to): Men finally starting to learn that society/marriage has been restructured in a way in which marriage doesn't offer them nearly as much as it offers the woman. Almost all of the risk is placed on the male, and almost all of the "reward" is given to the female. Due to the past 30+ years of ridiculous changes to college and the education system (made to bias it towards females), women going to…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 03:26 PM
2

I see a ton of quotes, and no one posted the best one? The most annoying thing is that ever since we started going out, she's always been incredibly paranoid and had trust issues with me (mainly due to past relationships), to the point where I felt like its been crippling my social life. Whereas I had always trusted her entirely as I knew she loved me and would never be do anything to jeopardize that... guess I was wrong Basically, she's been the crazy controlling one, and when someone finally d…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 03:06 PM
3

Yes. I have read about this extensively. He is basically totally, and completely f'd. The US State Department does not know of a single case in which the Japanese courts have ordered - and enforced - a child being returned to the US. In fact, even in the extremely rare case where they rule that the Japanese mother is in the wrong, and they go so far as to do something like awarding visitation to the father, there is absolutely no enforcement. The police consider it a civil matter, and they will …
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:18 AM
7

It doesn't matter. Those sort of "dumbasses" aren't going to read/believe an article like this. And why should they? The President himself campaigned on the "fact" that women make 77 cents on the dollar for "doing the same work as a man". Pandering (Basically, spreading a ridiculous/outright lie, in this case), should be an impeachable offense. When the President comes out and lies like that, it's directly responsible for a whole mess of idiots believing something is a problem, when the reality …
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:20 AM
2

Preface: I see that this article is from Australia, but I'm going to go ahead an assume that their system includes the presumption of innocence, as well. "They're difficult to disprove, the allegation lingers there," he said. This is the part that pisses me off the most. It's not supposed to be the freaking defendant's job to prove that he didn't do whatever ridiculous charge someone makes against him says he did. It's supposed to be accuser's job to prove that the other person did whatever they…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:13 PM
2

A civil suit against a five year old? Because the police wouldn't pursue a criminal case??? For a hug? A five year old hasn't even went though puberty. I doubt there was anything sexual about what he did. He's not even capable of that yet. What in F is wrong with people?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 02:48 PM
3

Friendly fire! It was a parody, dude. :) Do I really need to add the /s? I thought the "shitlord" would suffice...
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:36 AM
15

The reason to have a standard test like that is so you have officers able to handle actual riot conditions. She has every much a right to that job as a man, Shitlord! If those stupid "standard tests" are preventing women from getting equal representation on the force, those standards/tests obviously need to change. edit: Cease fire! /s, guys. /s! Apparently my parody was a bit too good...
/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:40 AM
18

Seriously! It's unbelievable... First, it's unbelievable that she admitted to doing it: Ms. Doucet went to trial in late 2009; she admitted the murder-for-hire plot but claimed that Mr. Ryan had subjected her to years of verbal abuse, and that she had no means of escape except to have him killed. but - somehow - was still acquitted (obviously the only possible way to escape "verbal abuse" was to have the guy murdered. It's completely understandable)! But, not only that. It's also unbelievable th…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:32 AM
15

I'd like them to explain to me how this is because of the patriarchy and it's really misogyny. They wouldn't. They would say this (and all the other regular guys who get shit on by the system like this every day) is just an edge case, and not worthy of discussion. They would then shift the argument to "all the deadbeat dads who don't make their child support / alimony payments", and say that we really need to spend more time talking about them, and how we can make more changes to the legal syste…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:15 PM
34

No. That's that's not how it works. Here's a quick summary: Girls underperforming in something -> OMG! This is an outrage! We need to make serious changes to the education system. The only reason girls would underperform is because the patriarchy is obviously doing something that is disadvantaging them, and setting them up to fail. Boys underperforming in something -> They're just lazy. Nothing needs to be done. In fact, despite the fact that every available statistic/metric shows boys have fall…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:50 PM
2

I too, love his works. The first exposure I had to Nietzche was a quote of his that was used at the opening of "Baldur's Gate": He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. When you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into you. To this day, that still sticks with me. Actually, I think a lot of us here would do well to consider this quote. There are a lot of guys (and people, in general) that have been hurt very badly in their dealings with "…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/13 05:55 AM
3

It wasn't trolling. It was sarcasm. I demand you rate this again, sir! This time for sarcasm!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:34 PM
0

This article is bullshit. Women wouldn't lie about something like rape.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:21 PM
9

Exactly this. Not only that, but also However, after Hamilton arrived, she told police that her mother has been “assaultive and aggressive” toward her father. She said her father had recently spent about a month at the Vermont Veterans Home and planned to move there. “Hamilton was extremely happy with her father residing at the Vermont Veterans Home, knowing that her father would be safe from her mother. Hamilton told me that something needs to happen before her father is killed or severely inju…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:06 AM
3

you know, there wouldnt be an innocent child without a father if there wasnt a selfish entitled woman who thought she could just make a decision like that for him. so why dont you blame the mother, who is responsible? I agree with where the blame should be; however, the child had no choice in the matter. By all means = blame/hate the mother, but don't throw your child to the wolves.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 03:57 PM
24

Who knew that American college students are required to surrender the Bill of Rights at the campus gates? American college students aren't. Male American college student are. Which is exactly what imbeciles like this woman have fought to make sure is the case all throughout society - one set of rules for females, and one - much more severe - set of rules for males. Edit: Seriously - show me a single article detailing a case in which a female student was tossed out of college, sending her life in…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:47 AM
1

That's not the way "laws" work when it comes to stuff like this...
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:46 PM
6

It absolutely amazes me that women (and women's groups) like this just cannot understand the terror/dread that men face under the current system. A system in which: A male can have what seems like completely consensual sex with a female, only to have her change her mind later, and the man instantly becomes a rapist, and has his life destroyed. A male and a female can both be equally intoxicated/impaired, have sex, and - again, despite the fact that BOTH parties were equally impaired - the male i…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:24 PM
79

I just don’t want to get married, get divorced and have a guy kick me to the curb or I move into an apartment. If a prenup let’s him keep all his money, then I’d rather not continue staying with someone like that. And if that’s what a prenup is, why get married at all? I swear, you can't make this stuff up.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:10 AM
4

I admit I think our culture often over-mythologizes father figures I don't think I could disagree more with this statement. I am in my mid-30's now, and when I think back on things, I feel like I've been conditioned my entire life (not by my mother, but via the education system, and the media - i.e, television, movies, the news, etc...) to look upon women/mothers as some sort of unfairly/tragically persecuted, under-appreciated, all-knowing, selfless saints. I'm not going to write an essay on th…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:26 PM
5

This is so thoroughly disgusting, it's incredible. I can't believe Chinese guys are willing to put up with this. I know humans have a really strong drive to pass on their genes, but I'd rather see my "line" come to an end, than grovel in part of a "sellers' market" like this.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 11:23 PM
2

I think it is relevant. We were dealing with double standards - as related to men/women and unintended pregnancies. In any case, I respect you for not being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:34 PM
5

Accepting that you may get pregnant doesn't mean consenting to be pregnant. I have to ask you this. What is your position on men being allowed the option of a financial abortion in the case of an unintended pregnancy? I.e, A man and a woman engage in consensual sex. Neither had any intention of creating a child. Both took all possible precautions to ensure that it didn't happen. Woman still gets pregnant. Woman decides she wants to have the child. Man decides he does not want to be a father. In …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:11 AM
16

With your amendment, I would then ask this: Were your actions directly responsible for that other person being in the predicament he is in? In particular, was it entirely your decision that he be hooked up to you? In fact, was it not only was it your decision, but was it the case that you actually went so far as to force him to be placed in this situation in which his continued existence now entirely depends upon your continued willingness to allow him to make use of your body? If that's the cas…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:23 AM
24

The intent of the guy, in this case, was the same as the intent of a woman who gets an abortion - to not have to be a parent when he did not want to. A fetus is not equivalent to a breast. Either terminating one is murder, or it is not - regardless of who is responsible. (Additionally, please do not interpret my saying this as being equivalent to my saying that I don't think the guy did something wrong. The guy should NOT have done what he did, and I definitely think he is guilty of some crime. …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:20 AM
26

If someone is sick and hooked up to my kidney for life support against my will, it is not murder for me to unhook him and leave him to die. So you are saying that as long as the woman was not forcibly impregnated - i.e, it wasn't against her will - you have no qualms with the fetus being declared a person, and thus abortion - again, in the case where the fetus didn't result from a rape - being murder? Also, before you start in on me, I am not stating that abortion should/shouldn't be considered …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:17 AM
60

Nobody is arguing that a man should have the authority to force a woman to physically abort the child like this. What this guy did was obviously wrong. What people are pointing out is that it's a little bit incongruous if the "mother" can initiate a second trimester abortion, and it's not called murder, but if a guy does something like this (again, what he did was admittedly wrong), it is considered murder. Either a second trimester fetus is a person, and terminating it is murder, or it's not a …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:20 PM
2

I thought you were speaking of the money she was actually awarded - i.e., 1500.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:48 AM
1

If you have all those qualifications, and you can't clear 750/month, you might be doing something wrong...
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:35 AM
3

I agree with this. I can understand why alimony was important back in an age where it wasn't common for women to work. Back then, the man had the "f you" card, in that he could leave the wife, whenever he wanted, and she would be ruined. Unfortunately, now things have come full circle, and it's the woman who can leave whenever she wants - for no reason at all (thanks to no fault divorce) - and be rewarded with a bunch of money for it. There needs to be a fairer system.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:32 AM
7

A long time ago - in an age where it wasn't common for women to work - I can understand why it was important. If a woman got married to someone, was a good wife/person, and the man just up and left her (for someone younger/prettier?) once they were old, what was the woman to do? Without alimony, a husband could destroy his (ex) wife like that. Nowadays, it's completely reversed. Even though it is perfectly common for women to work, thanks to no-fault divorce plus alimony, it's now the woman who …
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:24 AM
29

How are the police not involved more in this?? Because it was girls doing it to a boy?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:35 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1aqyc7/adria_richards_terminated_from_sendgrid/c9012xd
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:46 AM
55

I noticed that, too, and put it in my comment in yesterday's thread. I especially also liked this statement from her: Women in technology need consistant messaging from birth through retirement they are welcome, competent and valued in the industry. That's equality to her - not both men and women being treated indifferently, irrespective of their gender, but women getting constant praise just because they are women.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:20 PM
159

And the best part is that she most likely thinks she did nothing wrong. In fact, in her mind, she will be a righteous "hero" / "Joan of Arc", who was done wrong by her white ("Easy Mode 4 teh win!!1!", right guys?) male oppressors.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:10 PM
349

Some of it's probably that ("We got rid of her! Please stop ddosing us now!"), but the main reason is probably because her official title is "Developer Evangelist" - her job is literally to convince developers/companies to use Sendgrid. Her actions have done the exact opposite - she has brought them nothing but bad publicity.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:55 PM
1

Again. I'm not attacking you. I'm just relaying my experiences.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:53 AM
5

You know, don't take this as an attack at you, but when it comes to stuff like this, I prefer to just go with the word "asshole". When dealing with people like this, if someone uses "bitch", it often results in one of two things: The person uses your usage of the word "bitch" to invalidate your opinion by saying, "Oh! I'm a bitch? You must be a woman hating chauvinist, huh?" The person finds that word empowering. Look at all the various places (Songs, bumper stickers, shirts, blogs, etc.) that y…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:09 PM
1

Fixed. My apologies...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:20 PM
33

(I posted something like this in the /r/technology thread, so please excuse the repost if you have to see it twice...) Whether or not this woman identifies herself as a feminist, I do not know; however, from glancing at her twitter account, it seems like she is a self-important, self-aggrandizing asshole that's easily offended, and siezes every opportunity to push her agenda on everyone/everything. Look at this one conversation she just had with some guy who said he thought what she did was wron…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:39 PM
3

This. The guy mentions that he is responsible for a family, including three children. He probably needs to find work ASAP. Fighting a long, public battle - about why you are not a potential problem for whomever might hire you - is probably not the best way to facilitate that.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:57 PM
2

One thing that never cease to amaze me, is feminists wanting to censor others of those who have opinions that differ from theirs. Not to mention that if men had torn down feminist posters like this (and thus attempted to censor them), those same feminists would probably be pushing for the men to be prosecuted for a "hate crime".
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:13 PM
4

Maybe we live in different areas? I live in California, and over here, when it comes to unwanted/unplanned pregnancy, people in general (unless you live in a very conservative area?) are very accepting of all those options that I have listed women as having. If there is an unplanned/unwanted pregnancy, women have all sorts of options/outs. Men are told that one thing - "Well, if you didn't want to have a baby, then I guess you should have kept it in your pants". Also, that's only taking into con…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:42 PM
2

And this is my point - regardless of how obvious the discrimination should be, (current) society just goes, "Yeah! If a guy doesn't want to get pregnant, he should just keep it in his pants."
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:31 PM
3

You can try, but it's not going to work. It's just going to end up with women (successfully) lobbying with the standard, "If the guy doesn't want to get pregnant, he shouldn't be having sex." Of course, that completely ignores the fact that no one just tells women, "If she doesn't want to be pregnant, she shouldn't have sex." If a woman gets pregnant, she can: Have an abortion. Have the baby, have the courts make the father pay for it. Have the baby, trick some other guy into thinking he's the f…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:03 PM
44

Yes, THIS. We always hear that the courts are hesitant to harshly punish false rape accusers because they fear that doing so will discourage actual victims from coming forward. As there is absolutely no doubt about what happened here - that these idiots were willing to use a false rape accusation (one that would have completely destroyed this gentleman's life) as a weapon - I don't see any reason why the court shouldn't make an example of them.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:08 PM
2

Not get into this the situation in the first place?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:32 PM
23

You get told you're stupid enough, and you'll start believing it. Come on, man... :)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:23 PM
8

Do you honestly think this reads that way? This reads in the "classic", the boy will think the dad will know (because, he too, will assume men know everything), but the dad (who actually doesn't know anything) will have to come to the all-knowing mother for advise. Every single time you turn on the television, you are constantly bombarded by this message (in advertisements, and in the shows themselves).
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:24 PM
5

Did you read #20 all the way through: Let his dad teach him how to do things ...without interrupting about how to do it the 'right way.' If you let his dad show and teach and discover with your son while he is growing up, some day down the road (after a short period of your son believing his dad knows nothing), he will come to the realization that his dad knows everything. You will always be his mother, but in his grown-up man heart and mind, his dad will know the answers. And this will be how, …
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:49 PM
1

The thing about his body is that it's a body his wife is heavily involved with and invested in. If he doesn't want kids that's good for him but what about her? It is still his body. Women use this line of reasoning all the time, and it should be just as applicable here. Obviously, if a guy is married, or in a relationship, he should discuss a procedure like this with his partner. That being said, this should be the individual's responsibility/prerogative - NOT the hospital's.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:08 PM
6

Actually, this sort of thing (teachers getting caught having sex with students, teachers dating students, teachers groping students) happens all the time in Japan. You just don't hear about it because Japan does a better job of keeping things that would tarnish its image out of the world media (note: The only time the Japanese media really makes a big deal out something like this happening - adult/children rape/sex scandals - is when the perpetrator is a foreigner). This article is a little old,…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:55 PM
49

I really don't understand all the people who are basically saying "divorce her, and find someone else". In a better reality, divorcing her would be a valid option. In the reality that women (with the help of stupid men) have constructed, it is going to be extremely difficult to divorce a women with which you have two children with, and still be able to (financially) pursue any sort of meaningful life/new relationship. Does anyone here honestly think that if he divorces her, she is not going to g…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:34 PM
2

I honestly don't think there are a lot of officers that would arrest a guy for doing that if he had a baby with him.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:45 AM
2

The ridiculous part about this is that it's being sold as a "budgeting" issue. If you look at the numbers, I'll bet both men's baseball and men's soccer probably come closer to paying for themselves, as people buy tickets to go see those sports. I doubt the same can be said about the women's tennis program.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:05 PM
4

We went through a disgraceful attempt at a presidential coup with Bill Clinton, who was accused of lying about sex — imagine! — but survived to become a widely admired elder statesmen Ahaha.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:30 PM
2

It seems awfully strange to just have /r/mensrights blocked. That's what I'm saying: It's probably not a school policy that r/mensrights should be blocked. One person (or perhaps a group of like minded people) decided that they don't like r/mensrights, and either blocked it themselves, or had their friends in IT block it.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:57 PM
7

I seriously doubt this was the result of a school policy. Most likely, it was an individual IT person (or a teacher that was a friend of an IT person) that decided he/she would push their agenda on the rest of the school, and block MR.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:37 PM
5

The (most) frustrating part isn't that they're doing it, but that most of the media is letting them get away with it. If a republican was campaigning on something equally false, the media would be all over it. With this lie, not only are they not debunking it, of lot of them are actually helping to get this false "fact" out there. It's absolute bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:21 PM
6

Obviously, if you're speaking on a purely moral/philosophical basis, you are correct. However, when your country happens to sit on top of a good portion of the world's energy reserves, and sits right next to the Strait of Hormuz (chokepoint that 35% of the world's oil passes through), the rest of that world is not going to sit by and watch your revolution jeopardize access to that energy. If Iran didn't have any oil, the US/USSR would (probably) have been much less inclined to vye for control of…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:04 AM
35

It's called pandering, and it's a huge part of the bullshit that is politics.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:15 AM
1

No one has the backbone to call them out. I listen to NPR everyday because I have a long commute. NPR is heavily slanted to one side of the political spectrum - the side that panders to the feminist voting block. If you are looking for someone to call them (feminists) out on their BS, NPR is probably not going to be your best shot.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:41 PM
1

It just amazes me that Obama & company can pander campaign with the "77c to a dollar" line - and not get taken to task for the lie that it is - when the government's own stats show that it's not the truth. And they wonder why there are so many apathetic voters... Politics are an absolute joke.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:29 PM
6

In 2012 America, as she points out, women are better educated than men (women earn the majority of bachelor’s and graduate degrees); an escalating number of single women younger than 30 earn more than their male peers; and nine of the 10 U.S. job industries with the most projected growth are women-­dominated. So, I guess this means we don't need all those programs that continuously talk-up/puff-up girls, and then give them preferential treatment in getting into college? I guess we also don't nee…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:46 PM
3

I think we are looking at this differently. I am a small government person. I don't want the government to be given the power to force people/companies into doing anything more than absolutely necessary. Protecting people's/workers' rights is necessary. Paid-for-by-insurance-contraception for women only (again, I'm not aware of a government mandate forcing insurance to provide condoms to men)? How is that something that is so necessary, that it needs to be deemed a right? Unless it's the case of…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:28 PM
7

Let me start off by saying that I am not one of the crazies who thinks that women should be "put back into the kitchen". In the eyes of the law + government, I want to see men/women being treated exactly the same - both in rights and obligations. That being said, how does that mesh with these two situations you have brought up: 1). they are trying to repeal abortion rights How is it fair/equal that if a man has sex with someone - and neither of the involved parties do so with with the intent of …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:58 PM
18

It's ok that she forged his signature. He needs to accept the situation. That's what the judge thinks, anyhow... Judge Khairi al Kabbash said: 'Since you have been so noble so far and accepted your daughter and registered her under your name, why don't you continue with your generosity and big heart and accept the situation?'
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:23 PM
28

The 'horrible problem'? My daughter forgot to put her name on her kindergarten homework. Did she get suspended for that, or did they just move straight to expulsion?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:24 PM
9

No it's not. The writer has a history of stuff like this.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:30 PM
9

and the father didn't run away to a country that supports parental alienation. Like Japan - they are notorious for this. The mother (there have been cases involving grandparents, as well), can basically abduct the child(ren) to Japan, make up some bs about abuse ("he raised his voice once"), and that's it. Unless the mother wills it, the Japanese court system will never force the mother to allow the father to see the children again. Even in the extremely rare case that the father gets visitation…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:25 PM
7

This is from an ABC article, but I wanted to bring it to attention: Rutherford said that there are no plans for the return of her kids, who have now started school in France, where Rutherford says that Giersch’s mother’s boyfriend has a house. "Her kids", huh? It sounds like she just spontaneously created them all by herself...
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:16 PM
15

No. I don't want them to change the way that they go about doing it. I want them to stop doing it altogether. It is absolutely ridiculous/insulting to have a policy that men - men that have done absolutely nothing wrong - cannot be seated next to children. This policy is discrimination at its worst. What do you think the children who are watching the male stranger who is removed from his seat are taught to believe about males when they see this happen?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:23 PM
23

"On the rare occasion where a male passenger is seated next to an unaccompanied child, airlines need to take care when moving passengers to ensure this is done discreetly and respectfully." No. Airlines need to not ask the male to switch seats, as not only it is insulting, unnecessary, and absolutely ridiculous, but it teaches children to be afraid of men.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:18 PM
2

"In light of recent feedback, we're now reviewing this policy. Our intention is certainly not to discriminate in any way." Um... yes, it is. You're not prohibiting women from sitting next to two unaccompanied children, so it is, by definition, discrimination. "In our experience, most guests thoroughly understand that the welfare of the child is our priority," she said. Huh? They're trying to make this guy out to be a bad guy who isn't willing to put the welfare of children first? Not only that, …
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:37 PM
8

Or rather, political correctness gone wrong. You know, what upsets me about this is that people immigrating from more closed countries, to more open countries (like the UK in this example, or the US in others) don't seem to accept that they have to be willing to abide by the social contract of the place they moved to. They are more than willing to take advantage of the benefits of living in said country (better access to health care, more rights/freedom, higher pay, etc...), but they think they …
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:09 PM
7

This is the part that enrages me. If a woman drinks too much, a guy uses that to his advantage, she "consents" and they have sex that she later regrets -> in the eyes of the law: the guy raped her, because she got drunk, and thus wasn't responsible for her actions (even though she chose to get drunk) If a guy drinks too much and has sex with a girl that drank too much, and she later regrets that -> in the eyes of the law: the guy raped her, even though he was drunk too - even though he was drunk…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:44 PM
36

This is false. The Oakland Raiders have been on the receiving end of countless beatings, yet they are not in jail. Well...not all of them are, anyhow.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:12 PM
1

But you don't want to talk about it, so why start talking about it? It just seems like the first rule of stuff you don't want to talk about, should be, "Don't bring it up". In any event, I'm sorry if you think I'm giving you a hard time. I have no ill feelings towards you. I just thought this was weird.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:58 PM
1

Umm... if you don't want to talk about it, why did you bring it up? It's not like BigEddie sought you out.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:37 PM
10

Beems was arrested in February of 2010 for allegedly assaulting Flair during a domestic dispute at the couple's home in the Stonecroft neighborhood of south Charlotte. In that incident, police said Flair's wife punched him in the face. Beems was charged with assault, while Flair received minor injuries and was not transported to the hospital. Those charges were dropped by the district attorney in July 14 due to a lack of evidence. What? I thought one party's word was evidence enough?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:13 PM
3

Yes. This is how it should be based. If the people running/"selling" this event make the same amount of money off the women as they do the men, they should be paid the same. If they do, and they aren't, it's ridiculous, and the women have a right to be upset. If, however, the men's events are bringing in more money, the men deserve to be paid more. If women's groups don't like that, they need to convince more women (they do make up half of the population) to pay to watch women's tennis.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:37 PM
2

If people are willing to pay them that much, then why not? All people have to do to bring athlete salaries down is stop watching/supporting the teams/athletes.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:32 PM
4

This was the amazing part to me, too. If she wasn't stupid enough to do this in front of the officer (repeatedly, too - the article mentioned the officer told her to stop, but she kept it up), she probably would have gotten away with this, and the guy would be up on charges.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 02:22 PM
30

This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Girls are every bit as likely to have a cellphone as guys. On top of that, I think most people would agree that girls tend to use those cellphones, especially in places/situations where it's not socially acceptable, more than guys.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:34 PM
3

While it's a victory, it's going to be seen as "amg Republicans are against equal pay, vote all the Democrats!" among women. Which was the exact reason for this, in the first place. Whether or not the bill passes doesn't make any difference. Just having it out there during election season, forcing the other side to vote against it, and having the media report on it, gets the desired result. Politics as usual. And, to be fair (before someone accuses me of just hating on the left), both sides pull…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:16 PM
2

It doesn't look like anything is going to happen. I have read several articles on this, and almost all of them mention something along the lines of: It was uncertain whether Gibson will have to return the money and unlikely she would be prosecuted for making the false accusation so long ago.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:26 PM
5

It is ridiculous. Even if he had raped her in the manner she had originally claimed (Just to be clear, even she wasn't claiming that the crime consisted of something like him forcefully abducting her a knifepoint, raping her, beating her, and then leaving her for dead. It was a case in which there was sex that one party claimed was consensual, and the other claimed was not) how was this particular crime deserving of a forty-one year sentence? People get lighter sentences than that for murdering …
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:24 PM
11

You're saying that you think prison rape is happening because while wardens are forbidding masturbation, they aren't forbidding rape?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:14 PM
21

Even the ones guilty of those crimes should not be "punished" with (ultimately unsanctioned) rape. The Eighth Amendment protects against cruel and unusual punishment. If people want to introduce (sanctioned) rape as a punishment for rapists, go through the steps to amend the Constitution, instead of trying to go around it by having it carried out by other inmates. People in charge of enforcing the law, should be following the law. Our system of justice is not based on "eye for an eye".
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:10 PM
2

It would probably be a "hate crime".
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:40 PM
1

I have no idea how much the 203rd ranked female makes. It's unimportant. The whole point of posting that (other than the obvious one of showing that - at least when it comes to tennis - women are already incentivized plenty) was to point out that a guy who: Was (at the time of that match) ranked 203rd amongst his male peers Was never ranked better than 38th (achieved this 4 years prior to his match with Williams) Was a man "whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:01 PM
6

Serena Williams Career Prize Money: $35.9M USD Wikipedia Source Karsten Braasch (Ranked at 203rd in the world at the time he beat Serena Williams - 38th was the highest ranking he achieved) Career Prize Money: $1.5M USD Wikipedia Source You're right. If they only incentivized the female players better, they'd perform at such a higher level.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:45 AM
1

I hate seeing stuff like this. This sort of thing happens a lot, though. Japan is another country that is especially bad when it comes to enabling mothers/grandparents to abduct children from foreign fathers.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:02 PM
1

What was biased in this article? It was just two law professors analyzing the actual reasons given by women in actual divorce cases initiated by women. Those stats pointed out that stuff like infidelity, and abuse were statistically insignificant - the most common reason that women gave was that they knew they were very likely (due to the ridiculous state of the courts) to win custody of the children. It also stands to reason that they are also well aware that gaining custody of the children is …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:36 AM
1

And I'm saying that even if it would reduce the chance that the male would commit suicide, it would be so low on the court's list of things worth considering, it would never happen.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:28 AM
2

I agree. This article is disgusting. Instead of even considering that maybe it's due to: Men generally lose custody of their children. Men generally lose financially as a result of the divorce. Men have to sit by and watch as the ex-wife benefits from the very event (the divorce) that is causing him so much suffering. the writer comes up with what? That men are too emotionally weak to cope with losing the "unique" support structure that the woman (ex-wife) was providing? Honestly? Unbelievable..…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:26 AM
1

And why do women initiate divorce? Because they know they'll most likely win.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:13 AM
1

I think you are mistaken in your assumption that courts place any sort of value on the male's happiness/well being when determining the terms of a divorce.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:07 AM
2

Maybe these men were in the process of enjoying an ICEE? (I'm sorry for the humor, but I've honestly never heard of guys making slurping noises. I've heard of whistling, and cat calls - and I think those are crude/tasteless - but I've never heard of slurping. In any case, I apologize on their behalf.)
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:33 PM
2

Let's be honest, though. It probably is the number one crime that girls/young women fear. The problem comes from the fact that they fear it because of sustained campaign to pump it up with all the "1/4 women will be raped" bs, and not because it actually is the number one crime girls/young women are most likely to be the victims of.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:28 PM
2

Good luck with that, dude. I look forward to reading your IAMA after you get back from court. :D
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:11 PM
3

Maybe you could get it tattooed on the back of your hand? That way, when your hands are on the steering wheel, you'll always have a friendly reminder.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:19 PM
1

Don't worry, it's not. It's only ok if men are the ones being attacked.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:17 PM
2

That is a fair point. Boys do have a bit of biological advantage when it comes to athletics, and a girl performing well on a boys team is more impressive than the reverse. I am not blind to that, and I apologize if it seemed like I was ignoring it. I just think we would be better off keeping children's sports segregated by gender. I say this because I don't think the current setup is teaching anyone a good lesson. Boys, from a very young age, are beaten over the head with the "girls are every bi…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:31 PM
2

It's not just having/seeing a male role model, either. It's that when boys have only female teachers, they are probably only going to be exposed to a female way of thinking (This is especially evident in the way the education system pushes the feminist line). It scares me that entire generations of males are being shaped this way, from a very young age.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:47 PM
67

But the Section XI attorney said that Keeling's participation in the sport precluded a female player from receiving all-conference honors last fall, and that, as one of the league's top scorers, his playing could prevent an all-female team from making the playoffs, Newsday reports. So he was allowed to play, as long as he didn't play well enough to displace females? This just seems like another one of those stories where, if you reversed the genders, women/the media would be going bonkers.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:40 PM
12

But why aren't there more? She points out that the people who top the list tend to have made their money from male-dominated sectors, such as industry, oil, pharmaceuticals, property and construction. "There is still a challenge for women to get doors open, break the ceiling and have confidence." Well, there you have it. The reason for this particular "issue" is the same as the reason for every other issue. Men are keeping women down (And when we can't get it done directly, we do it indirectly, …
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:15 PM
1

Well, (to me, anyhow) the whole case would rest on whether or not he was drinking/impaired as well. If he was, then I don't see why only one of them should be help responsible.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:51 AM
1

How can something like this be justified? It can't be.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:31 PM
5

The amazing part is that the judge seems to understand that all those circumstances were in the guy's favor, but then gives him 5 years anyhow. He told Evans that he might have been used to receiving attention from women in the past due to his success as a footballer, but this case was "very different". The judge said the sentence took into account that there had been no force involved and the complainant received no injuries. He also said the complainant was not "targeted" and the attack had no…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:14 PM
3

This is the same thing I wanted to add, so I'll just add my support to your comment. With the way media / the world works now, stuff like this is almost guaranteed support. Who in their right mind is going to commit political suicide by coming out against "Violence Against Women"? Can you imagine the social media shitstorm regarding "So and so is pro violence against women!!!"?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:00 PM
6

I agree with this. In this particular case, the ex-spouse was apparently very involved in the running of the business/brand. Ilusion, a Mexican-American who married Millan when she was 18 and he was 24, was very involved in her husband's career. She helped him run Cesar Millan Inc. and designed the Illusion Collar, which helps control difficult dogs. She should be entitled to something for her contribution. It's the cases where the ex-spouse isn't involved at all, but still manages to reap a mul…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:44 PM
2

Well, in the end, she didn't really end up "donating" anything. The couple's "father" is the only one who "donated" something (the sperm, and now a boatload of cash for the next 20 or so years).
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:32 AM
8

At the time, they were married - thus he had no problem with it. Now, they are no longer married, and he does have a problem with it. More importantly, this eventuality was planned for, and there was a clause in the IVF contract (the one that both the man and the woman signed) that stated the pre-embryos were to be destroyed in the event that they were divorced: Although the Court expressly declined to adopt one approach on behalf of Pennsylvania, it did decline to enforce a clause in the IVF ag…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:49 PM
3

I understand the problem that no-fault divorce creates - but a spouse deciding not to work should be a mutual decision. If it wasn't, you should have divorced them then and there. I have no problem with downvotes, but would appreciate a response as to specific criticism of this argument. If I'm wrong, I would genuinely like to know why. You are correct - this is the difficult part. It's hard to make it seem fair that a couple (or can we agree that, in some cases, mainly just the wife) decides th…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:52 PM
7

I'm pointing out that while the state waived its share of the back child support, it doesn't say anything about the wife having done so. Thus, he is (presumably) still on the hook for half of the original $110,000. The state's Department of Social and Health Services has a programme for writing off child support bills in hardship cases, and it waived its share of Northrop's balance in November.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:48 PM
10

So rather than show a little bit of sympathy to her ex-spouse (the same one that just lost (17 years of his life to a wrongful conviction), the ex-wife is coming after him for a ton of cash. Classy.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:31 PM
2

That's what I was saying... I said that, at first, I thought your comment was just social commentary (and a link to something). Then I read the link, and found out that this same guy (the one who lost 17 years of his life to a wrongful conviction) actually did get hit with back child support. I apologize if it was confusing.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:57 PM
1

There are certain situations where they require this Can you elaborate? In my mind, unless one spouse is forcing the other not to work, I can't imagine a scenario in which one should be forced to subsidize the other after they are no longer married. Once a couple is no longer married, people should be responsible for themselves. On another note, I'm glad Massachusetts did away with the whole lifetime alimony thing. If you're going to have alimony, I don't think it should ever be more than a year…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:37 PM
4

Wow, this world is ridiculous. When I first saw your comment, I just thought it was the usual (and justified) social commentary regarding out of work dads and backdated child support. Then I clicked the link, and discovered that guy in the original story actually was hit with back child support... Unbelievable. You know what else gets me, though. It's amazing enough that the government would not pay this guy a single cent after stealing 17 years of his life, but it's more amazing that this guy's…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:48 PM
2

In school, the left-leaning feminist-friendly types make up the majority of teachers in primary education. They use those positions to push their agenda. That young girls should have an inflated sense of self worth, while the boys suffer from a lack of it, is not at all surprising considering the system that has been put in place.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:27 PM
2

If making that decision torpedoes your marriage, that's your problem, not the state's. This right here is the bottom line. It just absolutely amazes me that there are a significant amount of people (the ones who vote for idiotic legislators who pass laws like this) that actually want the state to have this sort of power over people.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:13 PM
2

I can't stand stuff like this. There is no way in hell that "Men Only Thursdays" would be deemed acceptable at a public gym, but come on man... As a result, I am forced to go to another gym and pay an expensive drop-in fee when I really can't afford it. Are you honestly telling me that once a week (for this one month only) you can't just go jogging outside, and do some light strength exercise around the house? You absolutely have to get your work in at a gym? Even if money is tight, and the drop…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 06:35 PM
5

...while we gave moms some well deserved time off. I like how, in addition to the incompetence/stupidity angle, they managed to work this tried and true classic in there. Because, you know, all us guys don't do anything, while the selfless women are taking care of e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g...
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:59 AM
5

This is why I like us. We're honest with ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:16 AM
2

It's the third paragraph from the bottom on the second page.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:39 PM
7

For some strange reason women actually have more money to spend than men on average despite them earning less. I think this phenomenon exists because there are a lot of men who, for whatever reason, think that being married means acceding all control of household finances to the wife.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:20 PM
0

I agree with this sentiment. However sad it may be, sometimes physical violence is necessary. As long as it isn't taken too far, and is used as a last resort, I don't have a problem with it. Some things cannot be solved with words.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:39 PM
1

How did you get "slutty behavior" out of "slutty flight attendant look?" Letterman destroys ALL politicians in his top 10 lists. Let's be honest here. Letterman does not target politicians from the left anywhere near the amount he targets people from the right.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:34 PM
0

Do they get a free pass just because they aren't conservatives? Yes - especially here on reddit. I am not a registered voter of either party, as I find things that I hate/like about both of them (mostly hate). Reddit, on the other hand, is decidedly tilted towards the left. In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with that. However, anyone that pretends there isn't a great deal of left side echo chambering going on here isn't being honest with themselves.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:29 PM
3

Each man was also ordered in court to carry a life insurance policy naming his former wife as sole beneficiary. If there is any symbol of how ridiculous the current alimony system is, this has got to be it. In the eyes of the law, these two poor gentlemen exist solely as a source of income for their ex-spouses. Un-freaking-believable.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:22 PM
8

That was before the idiots that believe this sort of crap got real smart, and made their primary goal pushing their agenda on children at school. If anyone is looking for something to read, you could check out The War Against Boys. I saw it suggested here a little while back, and as someone in his early 30's - who grew up experiencing the things/policies described in this book - it was very enlightening.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:20 PM
2

Look, don't get me wrong. I understand that women are the target audience. All I'm saying is that just like I feel bad for guys when I see how stupidly we are portrayed in the other commercials, I feel equally bad when I see some poor woman dancing with / being romanced by a Swifter (It's a disposable broom/mop thing if you don't know it.)
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:42 PM
6

This has bothered me for a while, too. Every commercial in which there are mixed genders always portrays the man in the negative light, and the woman in the positive light. About the only sorts of commercials that make me feel bad for women are the cleaning supply ones. I seriously doubt women are as happy about cleaning as they are always portrayed..
/r/MensRights17/02/12 06:55 AM
2

In other words Japan prepares to sign the Hague convention (mandating return of children abducted by a father only) While it is true that it is almost entirely men that are the "victims" of this, it's not really like that. For Japan, this is more of a 日本人 vs 外人 (Japanese person vs outsider/foreigner) issue. There are cases of the grandparents taking the child, and the foreigner getting screwed over. Along those lines, if you have some time, read this article and this article about Paul Wong - hi…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:34 PM
6

This sort of isn't going to work on "them". I'm fairly confident in saying that they would just counter with the whole "Well, there wouldn't be any wars if it wasn't for men" line...
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:34 PM
6

If you read what they are actually doing, however, you will find that it is basically all just for show. Here is an article from the The Daily Yomiuri with a bit more details on the proposed bill. Bottom line - there are all kinds of loopholes that will ensure nothing happens. First of all, they are of course making allowances for cases in which "physical violence or domestic abuse is a factor", which basically means that if the Japanese mother merely makes a claim of there having been DV, nothi…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 10:14 PM
4

Most people feel that they should be able to react or retaliate against someone who is annoying or doing something negative to them. But let's be fair, here, though. If someone is being an ass about sharing their yogurt with you, just go get your own yogurt. You don't really need to savagely headbutt them - regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:16 PM
16

A significant feature of the study is that it addressed concerns that men may not be willing to cooperate with women after the end of the competition. Critics of some programs have suggested that men may be resentful if they feel a woman had an unfair advantage. Third time commenting on this, but MY GOD is the spin infuriating. Did anyone else notice how they did stuff like what I bolded in the section I included up above? "...if they feel a woman had an unfair advantage" It has nothing to do wi…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:03 PM
9

I know I already made one comment in this thread, but the more I read this article, the more ridiculous it gets: Passive methods (such as increasing potential rewards for everyone) do improve participation by women, but they also improve men's performance as well, which leaves the gender gap in place. So if they do something that ends up increasing the performance of both sexes, it's bad? HUH? As a society, don't we just want a smarter population in general?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:44 PM
7

If the competitors know they have a higher chance of success before the contest even begins, the authors suggest, they are more likely to enter it with a positive view of their own abilities. In addition, excessive confidence in male competitors is reduced because they know rewards will be distributed in a different manner. Or...as the males know that the situation now exists in which they can actually perform better, but still place worse simply because particular competitors have different rep…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:24 PM
10

Unfortunately, it is real. Amazingly, not only are there people that are this stupid, but they also somehow manage to attain jobs that place them in positions of authority.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:00 PM
4

This actually sounds exactly like the kind of person she is. In her article, she wrote: If you are a regular reader of this blog then you know that sexual assault and victim blaming is my passion. I write about it a lot and I am also a survivor myself. So the idea that my own law school would hold such an event about the so-called problem of false rape accusations was troubling to me and I decided to attend. and I arrived in a purple sweater to show solidarity with my fellow survivors and advoca…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 06:34 AM
0

I don't see why marriage is seen as so important to her, but you can't really say that's her motive. It's important because she knows that each year older she gets, the less desirable she becomes. In turn, this this means every year that passes marks another year of her losing more power, and more of her bargaining position (with this guy, and any others she might have dealings with if she leaves this one). You know, in Japan, unmarried girls nearing 25 are called "Christmas Cakes". To understan…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:01 PM
8

The paper reports that Martinez instructed her friend to purchase boxing gloves to rough up her face. Then she scuffed up her own hands with sandpaper, used a pin to cut her lip, ripped open her shirt to expose her breasts, and urinated on herself to make it look as if she had been knocked out. She was quite thorough.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 06:07 PM
4

Nope. My father was an athletic 6'4".
/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:26 PM
14

Hell yeah, there is. One of my father's only lessons was that you can't trust anyone under 200 lbs.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 04:08 PM
56

Yeah. This guy is pretty much in a no win situation. He can either fight back, and probably get arrested for hitting a woman, or he can just sit there and be described as "cowering". I guess he could have just tried to restrain her or something, but who knows how that would have went over.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 04:07 PM
11

In other words, they have been taught that men and women are equal — except for all the ways in which women are superior. This is a fantastic quote.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:59 PM
1

By filing a petition for legal separation or divorce, the court will prevent the wife from removing the children from the state or country. Where I practice, as soon as the petition is served on the respondent (i.e. the wife), the respondent is put on notice that concealing or fleeing with the children is absolutely prohibited. I find this so funny. If the wife has no intention of going back to the US, do you think she really cares about whether or not the US Court tells her that she can't take …
/r/MensRights23/11/11 09:56 PM
4

To be fair, if you go check out the comments for the submission, there are very few that are ok with it. Most of them are just as opposed to it as anyone here. I suppose someone might try to make the case that all those people commenting that it's wrong are guys, but it seems unlikely.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 09:26 PM
3

I don't see the connection. The "Joe Paterno Case" is about a college football coach not doing enough to pass along the report of a boy(s?) being raped by an adult coach, that was relayed to him by someone else on his staff. This "case" is about two children of the same (or very close to the same) age briefly kissing each other. How is an adult raping children in the school shower in any way similar to two children harmlessly kissing each other? If this school official thinks this is similar, an…
/r/MensRights21/11/11 05:15 PM
3

"As a teacher, they obviously felt that this was something they wanted to report and we encourage that," said Terri Durdaller, spokeswoman for the Sun Coast Region of the DCF. Seriously??? No, we ("we" being the rest of the non-ridiculous people living in this country) don't want to encourage that. Two kids kissed each other, and this idiot thinks that is good cause to notify the "Department of Children and Families", and then the Sheriffs Department? I could see the teacher telling them that it…
/r/MensRights21/11/11 05:05 PM
8

The law does not specify gender, so a woman who bought an apartment would also get it back at divorce. I just don't understand how feminists can claim this law is biased against women, when it clearly states the above. All it says is that if there is a divorce, both parties get to keep what they had before they got married.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:57 AM
1

You are right. There probably isn't a specific law against doing it. Of course, if someone decides they have a problem with it, and an officer that is sympathetic to that way of thinking responds, that won't stop him from writing you up for "disturbing the peace", "Disorderly conduct", or something like that.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:16 PM
4

This is ridiculous. It is absolutely frightening how much power, that which amounts to nothing more than, an accusation has.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:18 AM
1

And not just any dolly - her dolly.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 04:54 PM
0

Maybe I'm just different, but I'd actually rather have my wife talk about stuff like this with strangers, than with personal friends - especially friends that I have to see/be around. Also, regarding her roundabout way of bringing it up (i.e, making it be about her libido): I still don't think you can definitively say that she was not, at least in some small way, trying to shame him. When a woman brings something up like this with her friends, it's almost universally true that the other women ar…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:28 PM
1

Or she was just looking to shame him? I'm not saying that was definitely her intention (the OP doesn't seem like he thinks that was the case, and he obviously knows her better than us), but it seems like talking about this on a blog was, at the very least, a little insensitive.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:04 PM
5

This man knows what he is talking about. I have had a connection to Japan for the last 8 years - I married a Japanese girl, and have spent a fair amount of time over there (I am there for almost a month out of every year). My observations match this gentleman's exactly. In fact, this very thing is probably one of the things that irks me the most about Japan. They have this worldwide reputation for being modest, when in reality they aren't anything of the sort. They ABSOLUTELY see themselves as b…
/r/MensRights10/01/11 09:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter