TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

k1ngm1nu5 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by k1ngm1nu5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Whatever "typical cook" image someone has is probably very dependant on their childhood and who cooked for them.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:07 AM
10

That's true. I think its one if those stereotypes that doesn't actually exist.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:52 PM
26

That's them targeting a female audience.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:11 PM
1

Oh. That's sickening. Thanks for the explanation. Ninja edit: and there's the link to the wikipedia page. Derp.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:50 AM
1

Wait, what's the significance of the white feather?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:24 AM
1

True, but its only upvotes.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:51 PM
2

Due to this being /r/mensrights, and considering they had sexism in there as well as racism, 90% chance it is.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:35 PM
5

Its more about their ability to stop a student from leaving.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:30 PM
30

She won't get it even then.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 04:13 PM
13

It could definitely be phrased better.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:43 PM
1

But I don't think so. If that were true, then dead bodies would could still be considered "alive" in the same sense you consider a fetus to be alive (especially if you can call a petri dish home). Also, this is getting a little bit into nature vs nurture. Which I am just fine with, but I tend to be on the nurture side more. Genetics determine things about your body, but your experiences shape your mind, and that is what makes a person a person, IMO. If you took your brain out, and plugged it int…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:59 PM
1

It says it is a fetus. That's how. And could you expand on that second part? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:23 PM
1

Oh, another thing. If I make a new set of chromosomes in a lab, and it could develop further, is that life?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:48 PM
1

From that source, third down: "Embryo: the developing organism from the time of fertilization until significant differentiation has occurred, when the organism becomes known as a fetus." [Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2.] Which is the opposite of what you were saying before. And that's the full quote. As long as you use that a source, so will I, if you don't mind.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:44 PM
1

Yes, you are right that single cell creatures are considered life. That's true, but all those single cell creatures will only ever have one cell, and furthermore, unless you fight the bacterial genocide machine that is hand sanitizer, you're just fine with killing single cell organisms. I'd like source on your first point. I don't care if its wikipedia or an actual study, just a source.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:55 AM
1

Due to a lack if scientific evidence, you can't say that as much I also can't say it doesn't. We just don't know when it starts.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:15 AM
1

There is no victim; not letting the abortion take place creates a victim, the mother. I respect your choice to not have an abortion, but don't try to force it on others by citing biased opinions and/or quite frankly stupidly inaccurate or even worse religion-based propagandized literature that has been categorically proven false time after time in scientific settings. Fetus is not a slur, it is a scientific term for an undeveloped animal growing inside the uterus of the mother (think that's the …
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:50 AM
1

I will admit to accidentally having gone into them once or twice, and they are without a doubt much nicer than the men's.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:30 AM
0

Neither are the anti-choice people, but your point is irrelevant for the same reasons you keep suicidal people from killing themselves, even when they want to die.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:26 AM
0

That's absolutely true, but unfortunately for you, we aren't talking about babies, we're talking about fetuses.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:25 AM
1

Just because they are illegal doesn't mean they should be. We need to be able to measure consciousness (dunno if that's the right word) in the brain to determine when it happens.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:24 AM
2

I think you misunderstood that.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:21 AM
2

Do you know about women's bathrooms?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:18 AM
-1

I think the stigma around being fat is there because being fat is unhealthy. It should stay where it is. Fat people are considered by many to be unattractive, and I think the reasons why is because its so unhealthy.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:12 PM
-1

Well, s/he's a little bit right. Its like that to a certain extent. Even if someone doesn't feel attracted to a type of body that is considered by many to be beautiful, they can still recognize the beauty. Of course, you can't apply that reasoning to every kind of body. I think fat women are gross and fat rolls are a major turnoff for me. Some people may feel differently about that, but I can't see the sexy that they see in fat women.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:10 PM
1

It'd be a pretty funny read. Little scary, too.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:04 PM
2

Is it harmless though? I'm not so sure. (Not gender specific, if its harmful to men, its harmful to women, and vice versa.)
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:19 PM
4

Oh god, those things scared me. The whole game did (um easily scared), but those especially.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:39 AM
1

Yes, it would. I don't know how we would go about doing it, though.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:01 PM
3

Yes. All of what you said is valid. And I know you weren't trying to say that, but some people in this thread are, or at least it sounds like it. I think we should start a campaign to publicize prostate cancer, or all forms of cancer that affects males more than females, if only to address the lack of resources and funding for men with cancer (compared to women with cancer).
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:52 PM
4

Still, with 99+% of victims being female, you can't really call them misandrists for saying it's a female problem. Also, misandrists isn't a word, according to android, and I looked up the spelling, it's correct.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:34 PM
2

As long as he's correct, why not? You can downvote what isn't correct or what you disagree with of his
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:28 PM
1

I think that would have more to do with the idea of licking and prostate cancer being connected. Licking boobs is fine, but licking up someone's asshole is not the greatest picture. Not everyone would think of it like that, but some people would, and that sort of ruins it. Eating yogurt would be a better way to do it: at the bottom of every container is whatever would be on the lid for the breast cancer ones. Also, you could put both on at the same time.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:23 PM
4

Do you happen to have statistics on how often men get that vs women? I've heard is incredibly rare, but I need to stop assuming things I've heard are correct.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:17 PM
-18

No, its medically better to be circumcised. Less bacteria because it can't hide in the skin. Easier to clean too, I'd imagine. But if I were to get it (which I have, but that's not all that relevant to this), I would rather have it cut as a baby than now, when I will be able to remember the experience, which I can't imagine being it a good one.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:14 AM
-7

Yes, you are correct from what I know, and so I am very glad I had mine done when it was. I actually slept through it, according to my parents.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:42 AM
-15

Better then than now. I like mine without the flap, but I wouldn't get it cut now if I still had it, because it would be far too painful.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:39 AM
3

Personally, I would prefer to have it circumcised (I know some people who have issues with their uncircumcised little guys, that are relevant to that fact), but I certainly want it done then, when I can't remember feeling it, than now when I would be feeling it for the next month. My parents claim I slept through it.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:37 AM
1

Goddamnit. I don't like living in Idaho.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:14 PM
1

I don't think this was done on purpose.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:16 PM
3

Then its both! I like this game.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:15 PM
-2

I don't, and I wouldn't actually advocate this. In a better world, it would be feasible to criminalize that, but in reality, there are way too many problems.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:31 PM
-3

OK, it's not like you need to read their thoughts to know they are Nazis. It's pretty fucking obvious.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:08 PM
-7

I agree, but they have committed a crime: teaching hatred of an entire religion's worth of people for absolutely no reason. Not an official crime, but it should be.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:44 PM
-13

A lot of people here are saying that the children are being taken away from the parents because the parents are Nazis. Now, this may be true, but the initial investigation was for abuse, which, given what the parents support, is not all that surprising. Even if the children are being taken away from the parents simply because the parents are Nazis, I don't actually have a problem with that. Taking the children away from their parents because their parents support genocide makes sense to me; it's…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:05 PM
4

That would be a win.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:57 PM
2

Based on the text post, no.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:53 AM
1

Well, this is India, so I wouldn't be that surprised if it was true.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:38 PM
46

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:24 AM
11

Yes. The issue about naming the arrested persons is it shouldn't be done in any case.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:21 AM
1

I'm all for the responsibility and morals, but we need public education; it's how most rights movements as well as most revolutions started. Edit: Actually, I'm not sure I want parents to be the only ones teaching their kids morals. Indoctrination would skyrocket, and a lot of parents I know would use the 'wrong' morals, from my perspective. Parents certainly need to play an active role in their child's development, but children also need an objective standard of moral conduct to hold themselves…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:41 PM
9

No, he's saying there could be other factors unrelated to the restraining order/lying. Maybe the father was unemployed at the time, and didn't have the financial capability of having his daughter any more often. Doesn't make the decision right, but we just don't know.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:37 PM
1

I think this is it, but it looks like the feature I mentioned is only with the paid version, which is $7.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:10 PM
2

It would have been good to have in court. For future use, there is a call recorder app for Android that you can set to only record certain contacts, and to record them automatically. It also doesn't make any sounds or anything like that to alert the other person.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:55 PM
2

Please tell us you recorded that.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:07 PM
1

The issue to me is that we need different people to be the 1%.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 09:00 PM
1

Look, I'm making all this up as I go, OK? Its not going to be perfect. I have no idea.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:47 PM
0

If you were mentally or physically incapacitated during your service that will affect you even after you leave/retire, you should get lots of benefits, probably even more than they give now. If people don't want to report it, that's their choice. You should have to have a doctor examine you and confirm the injury. Boom. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:21 AM
2

Yeah, OK. I could attempt to say something along the lines of, "Rand didn't actually kill anyone, but Nietzsche did actually molest children", but I won't, mostly because it's a bad defense and I can't back it up. You win.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:16 AM
1

Nietzsche was a pedophile, but atheists (such as myself) still use his philosophies.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:01 AM
1

No, and that's part of what I don't like. Of course, I also think that it would benefit them to use that money, so while I don't think they should sit on it, I still think they have a right to money they made.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:59 PM
-1

I'm not hurting people, I can't even vote. And I probably would support giving them more benefits, even if I personally don't agree with what they are being paid to do, simply because they don't get paid enough for it.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:36 PM
-16

I agree with cutting benefits for unwounded vets. The others should get something like injury compensation (or whatever it's called when you get hurt at your job). I don't believe that hurting other people for any reason is admirable in any way.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:51 PM
6

I want to help with that bake sale.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:48 PM
1

Ever read Ayn Rand? While I don't particularly like pure objectivism, materialism is nothing to be ashamed of, and that much is made very clear in her book.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:46 PM
35

So... be gay? Yay rhyming.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:30 AM
-1

Everyone forgets Metriod.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter