TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kaaari Archive

View 1 post and 33 comments by kaaari on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Social Issueskaaari/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:22 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm confused where it says this discriminates against men? Wouldn't this law help male prostitutes? EDIT: okay this part is important: "The DA’s office will continue to prosecute other crimes relating to prostitution, including sex trafficking and patronising sex workers." Criminalizing patrons harms sex workers and clients.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 01:34 AM
0

How is mocking a man's penis size helpful to the men's rights cause?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 01:30 AM
1

But you can point out the double standards without dragging others down. It just seems extremely unhelpful in the goal of advancing men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 03:07 PM
3

Uhm, I can't tell if you are being earnest or are being deliberately obtuse? These are phrases based on pining for an idea of a person's look, not they're actual preferred look. It's manipulative and bullying, especially when coming from close family who know what kind of look you are actually comfortable with. If you got with some woman who said to you "it's soooooooo hot when you pay for dinner" or "your big wallet is really attractive" would you consider those to be compliments?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:44 PM
6

She describes receiving constant degrading comments about her preferences. That is what bullying is. I agree that she should just cut it and ignore these people but your comment is just wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:49 PM
5

Thank you for taking the time to engage in this conversation. I really want to engage in men's rights issues, it's why I'm on this sub. But I get confused about what the point of the discussion here is when every 2nd post is about dragging some OP on TwoX.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:45 PM
1

This sounds like a really interesting conversation to have, but I don't understand why it has be shitting on the exact same conversation on this other subreddit? Let's talk about men's expectations and share the bad experiences we may have had with taking a less "manly" jobs. Why should that involve dragging TwoX? I really don't understand the technique here.. are you trying to invalidate this other post? Isn't the point you are making in the title the exact same point made in this other post?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:42 PM
1

You asked the HR person to describe what constitutes inappropriate work place discussion "so you can avoid it in future". That's what I was referring to. It seems pretty obvious that sexual joking is not appropriate for the workplace. Obviously it is not harassment unless it is directed at someone. As you point out, it's a pretty minor violation of workplace etiquette, but a violation nonetheless. I completely concede to your point that if it really was innocent and non-personal, it's not worth …
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:36 PM
0

I did comment, I called the situation ridiculous. If you can dish it out, you should be able to take it, to a certain extent. I also think it's poor taste to start the post by commenting on the attractiveness and size of the colleague. It's irrelevant, in poor taste, and only taints the legitimate argument about double standards. I'm trying to point out how OP might be taken more seriously if that tidbit were left out.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:22 PM
-26

You don't see anything inappropriate with asking a coworker to describe what makes them uncomfortable?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 01:12 AM
7

I feel like however ridiculous your coworker is being, two wrongs do not make a right. Also, why would you start this by describing her attractiveness? Her perceived attractiveness to you is irrelevant in a case of non-sexual workplace shenanigans.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 01:10 AM
2

These are not privileges you are listing, these are forms of discrimination. Treating a woman like a child is not doing her a favor.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 02:42 PM
1

I recommend reading the section "Review of Research" where the exact opposite of what you are stating is outlined. They basically say that most reports are going to tend towards false because of the extremely relaxed definitions of "false", including in the situation you describe. If the complainant recants, then a case cannot legally move forward (at least in my country).
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:42 PM
1

So you mean to say there are reported rapes that are unfounded but don't fall under these 3 categories? Can you give me an example? I'm having trouble understanding your point here.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 07:17 PM
1

no I wasn't quoting. It was a slip I think, I'm new to this subreddit and this view, I am trying to challenge myself. I think I just slipped with that language and I appreciate you pointing it out. Language is so important, and I didn't choose the right word.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:11 PM
1

Maybe you can help me understand your point here. I'll try and summarize the arguments and you can help me see what I'm missing. Thanks. The criteria for unfounded is that it is either false or baseless. This definition only applied to reported rapes since it has to be investigated to be found unfounded. Your argument was to say that the number 2-10% was probably higher because it doesn't count unreported "rapes" that were not true. How do we even know what percent of unreported rapes are founde…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 06:27 PM
1

Very good point and thank you for checking me on that language.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 06:16 PM
5

Hmm, thanks for pointing this out. I couldn't find information about the advisory council make up, but I really appreciate your point about how a department investigating "violence against women" cant exist if violence against women doesn't also exist, there's a definite incentive to exaggerate the problem when your job depends on it.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:19 PM
2

You probably can't debunk it because most people have been sexually harassed period(harassment is NOT rape). Have you ever experienced unwanted touch or sexual attention? If you haven't then you might live under a rock because everyone I know certainly has. The number of people that get harassed, plain harassed is certainly 100%.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:52 PM
0

The statistics quoted in the title of this post are from the DOJ, would you consider them to be feminists? https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/Publications_NSVRC_Overview_False-Reporting.pdf
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:49 PM
0

There is also a number of true rapes they found to be unfounded and falsely so, so your claim goes both ways. Especially when you consider that people are innocent until proved guilty, so its a much larger barrier to being a founded rape that is untrue (a false positive) versus the default of being unfounded where rape occurred, that might not have been investigated properly (a false negative). So they should add "AT MOST" to the that number.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:46 PM
5

women generally can't outrun men, I think that's the point of why they feel vulnerable.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:51 PM
2

Ah okay, fair, I wasn't understanding that. Well, as a pedestrian, it would make me feel a lot safer if people stopped using the streets to drive in.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:46 PM
5

right. well it probably would make a woman feel safer. That's not your responsibility though.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:44 PM
-1

Exactly this. If reporting were encouraged and made easier for victims, the stakes for making a false report are much higher including jail time. Compare this to the stakes of claiming rape without reporting it, the average person won't investigate the claim, they'll just "believe all victims".
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:43 PM
0

Here's a report from the DOj that has these stats: https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/Publications_NSVRC_Overview_False-Reporting.pdf They define the term "unfounded report" to refer to both false and baseless accusations, accusations where no rape has occurred. They use information from 3 surveys to narrow down the rate of unfounded reports as between 2-10% of reported rapes. There is still the question of whether or not the same % of unreported rapes are also false. The reason we can't …
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:41 PM
4

intragroup variance is much higher than intergroup varience when referring to gender/sex. What I mean by that is there are some obvious average differences between men and men, but that inside one group there is a much bigger difference between men than there are between men and women. This article doesn't acknowledge this in the slightest. You shouldn't feel like less of a man for not wanting what this article describes and ditto for women.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:28 PM
1

Art is about expressing individual lived experience.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:01 PM
6

Just wondering, is this a problem? I was under the impression that women cross the street on their own if they are uncomfortable, what woman would ask you move out the way (especially if they are nervous of you)? I mean this in earnest because I guess I am not hearing this messaging you are referring to. I would expect women are just saying "Don't be offended when I cross the street upon seeing you, I am a vulnerable individual"
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:59 PM
2

Good point, I do remember this "losing virginity" trend of movies in the 90s. The scene you described is an interesting way to handle this trope. The movie I'm referring to is from 2018, and it's a regression? Just wondering, the scene you described, is it from the original "Road Trip" or from "Scary Movie", it sounds like a good satire to call out a serial pedophile as being a creep and have the boy/teen/man keep their virginity as an FU to that.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:47 PM
3

I will not be watching Cuties, thanks. I have seen tons of coverage of the grossness of Cuties despite it being recognized critically. For the movie I watched, I found it so strange I didn't see any mention of this in reviews, even after I looked deeper.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:29 PM
1

I'm not going to respond to this specific example, just because I don't anything about it, I don't know how its handled etc. Maybe you can enlighten me? What's your opinion?
/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:29 PM
1

I'm sorry I don't know what this means? These aren't characters in the movie I was referencing, are they? EDIT: A quick google search shows me they are characters from some other animated media. I don't watch movies or TV generally so I don't know if this is some common trope. For me it stuck out like a sore thumb.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter