TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kadivs Archive

View 0 posts and 203 comments by kadivs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

man MSNBC is cancer.. https://i.imgur.com/3UpYcYV.png 3 I can understand because of stupid regulations, 1 because of greed. but the rest? I hate websites like this
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:57 PM
-1

I'm fine with that book being sold. I think it's disgusting, but I'm not in favor of censorship
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:36 PM
4

lines on paper don't hurt anyone
/r/MensRights20/09/20 02:04 AM
4

tbh I believe ther eonce were such posts. AFAIR there were subs like rapingwomen or something. But they have been gone for a long time now
/r/MensRights20/09/20 02:02 AM
-5

You posted to MGTOW subs for over half a year now (was too lazy to check further) so who do you want to fool for karma? You're no 'new convert', you were part of it all, depending on the definition even more extreme, for over half a year
/r/MensRights12/09/20 01:01 AM
1

did this guy never have morning wood?
/r/MensRights28/08/20 09:34 PM
64

FYI, "yesterday" was apparently a year ago. "On February 28, 2019, after the jury deliberated for 45 minutes, Oakman was found not guilty of sexual assault." Not an argument or anything, just pointing it out
/r/MensRights16/07/20 09:35 PM
1

Also you can be double-unfit for service which means you have to pay no matter what
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:30 PM
9

nah, it's long over, it's just propped up every now and then when "journalists" need a black sheep. That doesn't change the train wreck that is the wikipedia article
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:49 PM
49

There are folks out there who are eager to "write history" in a way that aligns with their views and objectives. They want to ensure that "the facts are on their side," and the best way to do that is to write the facts. the best example will always be gamergate in my opinion. If you were around and interested, you'd know that quinn just got the ball rolling and was irrelevant after a very short time and so on. The wikipedia article reads like it was a targeted harassment campaign agains her and …
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:43 AM
3

doubt that. the general public will probably never even hear of this tho I must say I'm pleased the answers to this tweet are pretty much united in condemning them for it
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:03 PM
5

just a matter of time until marriage is no requirement any more. If that hasn't already happened, wouldn't surprise me. tell me you can't imagine a judge going "well you lived together for 2 years, that's an informal marriage"
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:14 PM
3

heh. I have a really awful memory, partly medically explainable, I hardly remember anything that wa smore than 2 weeks past (I remember some things, but explaining it all would take several paragraphs). but one of the only things I remember from years back is that I got a compliment from a woman. I don't remember from whom exactly, nor do I remember what the compliment was, but I still remember that it happened
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:51 AM
9

oh god that sub.. I love it when they get it right while being sarcastic That's one of the top posts of all time. I get a hunch that sub might be a biiiit biased
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:38 PM
2

If I saw that, I'd totally use the female one and label everyone that disagrees as transphobic. I don't mind gender neutral bathrooms but this shit is a step too far
/r/MensRights11/01/20 02:48 AM
6

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7865771/Special-ed-teacher-avoids-jail-having-sex-two-students-19.html FTFY
/r/MensRights10/01/20 12:23 AM
2

and despite the daily mail acting like they're against this, they're part of the problem, because they title it "sex acts" and not rape. Males can't be raped, right, daily mail?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 12:21 AM
1

the illuminati or free masons are to blame!
/r/MensRights07/01/20 11:41 PM
1

yet still waiting for those sources
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:08 PM
5

uh.. would you disagree that the middle east is mainly patriarchal? that's like saying "oh god not again with the western right-wing nonsense of 'anime has usually oversized eyes'" or was this just your attempt to weasel out of providing sources for your claim? because it sounds like it
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:51 AM
1

honestly, in a global scale that includes ass-backward nations like iraq and the like, I'd expect women are raped WAY more often. those are real patriarchies but I know of no real matriarchy. is there a source for it to be even globally?
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:31 AM
4

it's not always based on religion, at least not directly. In the US it's done because that old shithead kelloggs thought it prevented masturbation in boys - which in turn was bad because religion. But you wouldn't find many people doing it to their kids because "it prevents masturbation" nowadays. It's because "my pappa did it and I like my lil jon so I'm gonna do it to my kid as well, he's oughta be like his papa!" Basically, tradition not religion, even tho the tradition ultimately came from r…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:54 PM
3

religion is literally a BS cultural thing. [/edgy boy]
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:40 PM
1

I think it'd be funny, same as a female one. If it wasn't handled out in an educational setting and done about both sides. Hell, I can even laugh at such stuff when it's one-sided, just like I can laugh at female parking jokes etc, but it has no business being anywhere other than a "funny images" website or something similar.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:06 PM
3

I could only imagine this not being a clusterfuck if they were required to delete every bit of DNA data for both parent and child right after the test, and not using it for anything else but the test. LEA would love to get their fingers on the DNA data of everyone born and their parents. As would insurances. Hell, probably even hospitals so they could target ads to you full of scaremongering of things you might be predisposed to. Even then it's kinda questionable if they wouldn't just sneakily r…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:37 AM
30

she: hire because vagina! ppl: maybe hire because talent she and you: no! don't hire penis! funny how both you and her equate talent with penis.kinda sexist but ok.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 04:38 PM
1

I could absolutely not understand how that is possible. I didn't check the sub. but after reading "had sex with" instead of raped, suddenly I knew why
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:30 PM
1

why catholicism and not christianity? Original sin is a core tenet and the tithe of the catholics is not a tenth anymore but more like "give freely as much as you want", like in pretty much every other denomination.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:04 AM
7

I never really got how objectifying someone in porn was supposed to be a bad thing. You objectivy people of all genders all the time, the context matters. Men are objectified in porn just as much, they're just a penis, not more, and that's ok. To put it in perspective, let's take an example from another genre: You objectify goons for the hero to kill in an action flick. You don't know nor do you care about how well they can recite poems or if they like long walks down the beach or if they just h…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:25 PM
22

it's not just shit, it's bullshit. Men ejaculate if they don't wank or have sex. It's called nocturnal emission and a doctor should know about them.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:23 PM
2

oh boy, the answers to this tweet were great. both the outrage and the justifications. It's totally not sexism because power + prejudice! But it is racism because there's a black guy! Personally, I'm not offended and she can do that and I'd be ok as well if a man did it.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:03 PM
3

I.. I was nearly wooshed because you see such stuff way too often. you should add an /s :)
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:46 PM
54

I think the problem is not what she is doing - I at least have no problem with that either. The problem is that it doesn't take much fantasy to imagine what would happen if the genders were swapped and it was posted on twitter like that. And what people having no problem with it would be labeled
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:38 PM
1

yeah, and foreskin has plenty of nerve endings. doesn't hurt the analogy, BOTH are not useless but you can live without them, that's the point and yeah, insurance is so much more important than the mutilation of babies bodies if and only if they have the wrong gender. Imagine there was a practice of socking male and only male babies in the face after birth and a dude was like "I was socked in the face and turned out right! Women prefer flattened noses anyway! I punch my baby in the face after it…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 09:41 PM
1

for your 1 and 2, just equate it with ears. They're skin that, sure, serves a function, but you don't need them that much. 1) Cutting off ears is more hygienic. fact. Sure, if you can train a male in every circumstance to practice great ritualistic cleaning of that area.. There's no ritualistic cleaning. just pull it back once in the shower is all you need to do, hell it's enough if you do that every couple of days and for the rest it's just the same as washing your balls. I'd go as far as to sa…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:20 PM
38

it's not really lubrication but it's related. For most people coming from, say, europe, it's very weird how much lube is engrained whenever there's a joke etc about masturbation in american media, because for us.. nobody uses lube because why would you? Just means more to clean up and the foreskin fulfills the lube's function. And I'm happy you decided not to lubricate your boys genitals :)
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:59 PM
2

oh, did you miss the "unless it was a repeat offense"?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:58 PM
19

yes, and I'm not saying it shouldn't be a crime. fine that shit, sure. But jail time seems unequal retribution to me
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:55 AM
35

yes. And I don't think that would be just either. That's why I said "no matter the gender"
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:14 AM
37

unpopular opinion: just touching someone, nothing more, should not end in jail time no matter the gender unless it was a repeat offense
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:59 AM
7

one of us two whooshed pretty hard here
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:56 PM
16

no, not a pedo, after all, it's "had sex with" and not raped! see? /s
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:45 PM
4

gender neutral: Womens unless it's empty
/r/MensRights04/07/19 06:30 AM
0

yeah, I agree. That should not be banned and neither should humor/sarcasm directed at women be. I'd only have a problem with it if the other side of the coin, like the example you mentioned, was banned/removed. then yeah, equal rights and rules for everyone. There will likely always be trashy shirts, be it this or "I'm with stupid" or any other. At least you know not to associate with the idiots that wear them. It's also a difference if it's a decades old joke that everyone fully realizes is one…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:15 AM
6

Some men care about people other than just themselves So they think all women are victims. At least as far as menslib is concerned
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:52 PM
1

hell, not even just there, the discrepancy is anywhere. just compare "CBT" to "cunt punt" on your porn portal of choice. Maybe you know a better name for the latter, but it always amazed me how much penital mutilation is in porn of all things combined to the opposite of it. You'd think in porn it would be the other way around, but even there, nah
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:41 PM
32

maybe not for laptops, but as stickers to spread around in a city they would work great. I'm not one that defaces public property, but in theory, when here are already loads of stickers, why not
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:31 PM
1

this and I saw plenty of men raging about it
/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:32 PM
1

he said he wanted to know! ;)
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:45 PM
2

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:15 PM
2

well in that case, I'm afraid you're the asshole here, my friend
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:14 PM
4

and there would be way more if it was as hard to get a man as it is to get a woman. Because men want sex, as she said.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:36 AM
9

I think if the left side was "sexism" it would even hold a bigger punch - because it would be a clear mirror. And we all know how they react to "all women are gold diggers" or something like that Still, good work :)
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:15 AM
3

I'm not saying they did or this is what happened, but wozuld you really be surprised if google would skew the ratings of a vid if a big company "donated" some money under the table?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:06 PM
1

it was statutory as well, so.. multi rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 09:52 PM
1

I feel like you misinterpret his argument (not out of malice). he says the reason high heels "fell" towards the women is because they have a biological imperative towards accentuating sexual features, and that it happened DESPITE society pressing them hard on one sex (the other one), not because of it. Anyway, I still don't really see what fashion actually has to do with gender. say everything you say is true, then crossdressers would be considered female? I can tell you plenty of them aren't tr…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 06:46 PM
1

or, you know, being underage
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 08:06 AM
29

I'm really no survivalist and would die on such an island, but still. what did make them think splitting up like that was a good idea? Their "camp" had no special ressources, just a fire, they could set up a similar camp again with no problems. And why did those in the camp not think "hey, instead of just sitting here, now that not even the fire is burning, why don't we go off on our own?" And if they wanted to find a beach, why the hell did they not just follow the shore? So many questions
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 07:43 AM
14

They are brought pink clothes and dresses, boys are bought baseball jerseys and jeans. they are bought that because that's what they like. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/icd.1986 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02027.x There wasn't a cabal 200 years ago that decided "from now on forwards, girls will only get pink stuff". It's because there (generally, not in every single case) is a preference for certain things that differs between the sexes, wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 07:04 AM
25

I don't see the problem. Male only bathrooms mean women can't go there if they so choose, which is wrong. But it wouldn't be save for women if men could just barge in the women's bathroom, think of all the rapes that would be happening. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 06:53 AM
16

did you mean /r/quityourbullshit or am I missing the joke?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:06 PM
-1

most people would see it as endearing/cute. Or so I'd hope.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:48 PM
0

My boyfriend is a high school teacher and he’s had female students call him fit (good looking) straight to his face uh, I don't see a problem with this. Also with calling a female teacher "beautiful" (or, hell, "fit") right to her face. That's not harassment.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:19 PM
1

give me a number about how many guys get hard over legs versus over boobs. sure they have a sexual function. nerve endings, for one. and evolution for the other. second one is too big a topic to get into it, but just ask yourself why men like boobs. attracted to the fat? I'm sure you'll find plenty of soft porn with just zoomed in images of double chins, right? seriously, are you kidding yourself or are you aware and trying to kid others? how many women do you see with implants in their chins to…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:40 AM
1

it's not about controlling boners, it's about what is sexual and what is not. If you just dismiss what has an effect on the other gender, then nothing is sexual for the vast majority of people. Dudes usually don't care for other dudes penisses, so why should they be sexual? They're mainly used for peeing after all! Sure they get used during sex, but limp ones don't, so they have to be perfectly OK wight? Get real. Also typical american mindset “my country is the whole world!!” I'm european. try …
/r/MensRights07/09/18 06:14 AM
1

They do, but usually at night when the kids are asleep, or on pay TV. And ask yourself, if you weren't the minority, then why isn't it OK on american TV? Hell, if there's nothing sexual about it, why do dudes get hard when they see them? How much in denial do you have to be to think there's nothing sexual about boobs? They show bare asses on TV as well. Do you think sending a kid a pic of your ass is as innocent as a pic of your forearm?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 05:44 AM
2

yeah you personally may not think that but I'm afraid you're in the minority there. Let's meet in the middle, a dick pic but the dick is limp.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 10:03 PM
3

It would be more like sending a dick pic. Personally I think it sounds a bit harsh, but I dunno ho wmuch a dude would get for a dickpic
/r/MensRights06/09/18 12:43 PM
6

"true victims of sexual assault", not "true victims of this case". Still a scrummy thing to say
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:13 AM
1

the thing is false accusations can effect his marriage just as well, so there's no need to assume he's lying.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:49 AM
3

not fixed enough.. getting him high on Xanax *drugging him with
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:03 PM
12

I think that bit: And the adult you shooed off is a mom, possessor of the same crumbs you've been fed, no was not serious but just a reaction to the original question. kinda like "we want a girls club because girls are oppressed" - "you do realize she's a girl as well, do you?", pointing her hypocrisy out
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:39 PM
253

half-decent? I found it pretty full-decent to be honest
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:37 AM
0

I assume you're against all forms of divorce. If not, just make sure you tell your partner "till death do us part, or I don't feel like it anymore"
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:43 AM
5

oh, it is fucked up. it's not something you should do. But I can still understand it and I can't blame her too much as I'd possibly do the same, I dunno, I was never in that situation. But I'd feel the exact same way with genders reversed, so I don't see how that's a mensrights issue.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:19 PM
4

I'm sorry, I can't really fault her here. It's not like she was responsible for the attack. It's great that he saved her, but that was of his own free will. Is it unfair? Yes, surely. But it's one thing if she did it right afterwards or years later. I don't say I applaud her or anything, but I can understand it. Should she be forever bound to him for something she had no control over? I know I couldn't do that. I also know that if I loved someone, I wouldn't want them to be forced to care for me…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:09 PM
17

I absolutely hate that shit. You don't have to go as far as a burn victim, pick anyone that ever said "I'm so ugly" on the internet and you'll find 20 people tell her or him how 'they're sure s/he is beautiful' with no clue how they look like. A was kinda on the receiving end of that once (not looks but something similar) and felt insulted, because I know they just lie and have no idea if it's actually true.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 11:03 AM
1

this is equal to saying "have you tried not being depressed?" to a depressed person. people being alone aren't alone just because the thought of speaking to a potential love interest never occurred to them. either they have a mental block preventing that or they suck dearly at it, or both.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:33 AM
0

look, I agree with you, but this kind of comment is as useful as "educate yourself" is when it comes from feminists. Either cite direct sources.. or don't at all, don't just say "look it up"
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:28 AM
2

ah thanks, thought there was a team behind it. if it's just one guy, probably doing it in his free time.. I dunno, I'd rather not.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:48 PM
2

that.. is pretty petty
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:14 PM
2

lol closed source. so much for considering it. But I've always wanted to give pale moon a shot.. anyone knows if it has dire downsides?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:02 AM
1

UN_Wohumen but why stop there.. UN_Wohuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhu...
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:40 PM
1

the subreddit and the term existed far longer than the movie did
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:56 AM
2

If I had the option to work from home, I'd totally do it. As much as possible. co-workers can use the phone. This has nothing to do with the sex. Maybe her commute is long. maybe she's introverted and you're extroverted. maybe 20k of other reasons. I don't think the gender factores in anywhere. I mean, stereotypically women would be more likely to mingle.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:49 AM
1

to be fair, it seems common practice (or at least it was done with me as well) to break the tooth down into smaller bits before extracting. I had no bone breaking, granted, but that pressure and the crunching is something you have anyway. What I wanted to say is that, at least for common wisdom tooth extraction (you didn't mention bone breaking) it is not that different to normal dentist work (which itself is gruesome but something most people got used to)
/r/MensRights15/09/17 06:04 AM
2

That's quite different I'd imagine. Wisdom tooth extractions in my country are pretty much never done with full anesthesia (I guess you could request it but I'm not even sure there). For the most part, if you felt no pain, it isn't actually that different to your normal karies drilling, as far as your eyes can see, something most people are unconfortable but familiar with. source: extracted all 4 with just local anasthesia
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:12 PM
1

If all the "good/normal" PEOPLE in our society just worked together to stop all the "bad/abusive" PEOPLE in our society It's called the law system. It's just fucked up when it doesn't work, like here
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:28 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BijChf8ROJU Still as relevant now as it was back then, it seems
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 09:53 AM
0

just fyi, if you see this and need the seat, just ask. sure, the way she's sitting, malice is implied.. but still I get on the train at the first stop and only several stops later it begins to fill up. I got big ol' legs and it's unconfortable to reduce the tiny space for legs in public transport even more, and the train is basically empty, so I just set the bag on the seat. by the time the train fills up, I'm often reading or otherwise zoned out and don't realize people might need the seat but …
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:07 PM
1

Seems like many feminists, particularly influential ones, do as well.
/r/PussyPass03/03/17 05:11 AM
11

hey buddy hate to break it to ya but it's not.
/r/PussyPass02/03/17 02:30 PM
7

That depends on the issue
/r/PussyPass28/02/17 01:14 PM
21

No. No it's not. I'd count myself as an antifeminist, but just because I think feminism is bad does not mean I think egalitarianism is bad, and it has nothing to do with anything else the alt-right is for. I am not alt right, I am in fact against it.
/r/PussyPass28/02/17 08:52 AM
1

foregasm.. that's a new one
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:05 PM
4

Feel proud that you can in fact wank normally without lube :D
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:48 PM
3

whoosh
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:42 AM
5

MISOGINY!
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:40 AM
0

it was you that called someone a dumb fuck, while the dumb fuck was you.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 06:01 AM
1

the best way for bad feminists to win is for the good feminists to never say anything. exept bringing up no-true-scotsman every once in a while
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:57 AM
-1

4chan is as close as it gets unless you go dark Web but I don't want to see skat porn I was talking about 4chan you dumb fuck I'm sorry but doesn't look like you were. you obviously equated the deep web with scat porn as the reason you don't want to go there. If you meant to say "4chan is as close as it gets (unless you go dark Web) but I don't want to see skat porn" then that hardly makes chaun2 a "dumb fuck", it was you that worded it ambiguosily and did not use neither commas nor parentheses.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:47 AM
2

wAmyn
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:56 AM
5

then you train your creature to do it and you got sex slave city
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:19 PM
1

even the guy side.. so much stuff I don't use and I don't think I'm so uncommon. Does everyone use soap in addition to 2in1-shampoo? what the hell is construction creme or beard balm? How many guys use moisturizer? wtf?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:49 AM
6

The most vocal "feminists" who feel like men are wrong just for being men are actually shunned by actual feminists who are looking for equality. I've yet to see that. Besides just no true scotsmen etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpPebV2ZqwQ
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:31 AM
2

I always tought that the feminism symbol looked like a simbol for fisting. Like something on a t-shirt a porn star would wear. I think I just sexualized the feminist symbol. I'm proud of myself.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:26 AM
0

/r/titlegore
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:17 PM
1

Mate/Cinnamon all the way baby
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:26 AM
3

If someone cares, here's the transcript of the texts: https://www.bizarrepedia.com/charged-with-suicide/
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:12 AM
1

I really really hope this is something that will never happen. Sure, there are some people that off themselfes for stupid reasonst, out of affect or some like this poor guy here. There are plenty that have good reason. What you do with your life and when you end it should be your call and yours only. I know that is hard to believe for some of you, but some people have good reasons for it, there aren't only the "oh no my girlfirend left me, I'm gonna kill myself" reasons but also "I lived the las…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:51 AM
3

I'm sorry but that lady is so fucking annoying, I'd rather listen to the feminist (or none, closable browser tabs be praised)
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:21 AM
1

yeah. I know what you meant. That was sarcasm because surgery to make them bigger is WAY more common
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:29 AM
0

For getting bigger boobs, you mean? Sure the opposite exists but there surely are males who'd hate having even bigger arms. But as a rule, most women probably wouldn't mind getting bigger breasts, just like most males would probably not mind getting more muscles
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:11 PM
12

how does that differ for women though? how many would hate having bigger boobs?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:07 PM
0

despite.. or because?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:13 AM
1

I know what bullshit tastes like. Quit spoon-feeding me it. That was beautiful
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:12 AM
34

I'm just gonna leave this here: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/when-it-comes-to-catcalling-sydneysiders-are-a-far-cry-from-the-new-gawkers/story-fni0cx12-1227110190297 maybe men aren't the problem. Maybe social standing is.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:11 AM
0

I guess I should have posted it here then, rather than here. Look at all that sweet karma I didn't get Don't worry OP, I don't blame you or anything, you probably also got it from the quinn post in /r/videos, all the karma rightly belongs to that guy anyway, I'm just sad because that would have nearly doubled my link karma which would have been a warm fuzzy feeling
/r/MensRights21/08/14 08:23 AM
7

No. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwertz
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:52 AM
10

ö and l are actually right next to each other on german qwertz keyboards
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:53 AM
4

You failed to join the circlejerk and were downvoted accordingly. poonpeennawmean 35 points ಠ_ಠ yeah he was maybe downvoted back then, but I still hate such comments
/r/MensRights15/07/14 09:35 AM
2

I come from a country where military service is mandatory, at the least 21 weeks (which is pretty much boot camp). If you're medically unfit for that, you go to the civilian service. If you are also unfit for that, you pay yearly. Except, of course, when you're female. Yes, females, if they want, are let into the army, but no mandatry service, neither military nor civilian for them and no paying. The reason we hear all the time is "females have to bear children". They would maybe have a point if…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:51 AM
-3

It's from nickmom after all. you'd probably have the same ration if it was genderswitched and posted to nickdad (if that exists)
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:17 AM
1

but people would probably be AOK with "real whites don't kill blacks"
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:56 AM
1

Just wondering, why do they even have to do this? Wouldn't they have this info already from taxes or something?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:28 AM
16

Why does the stereotypical feminist image (right) include lipstick? Wouldn't that be oppression by the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:59 AM
15

You'll probably be dead in a week. I mean, how can you worry about getting something to drink while there are wars going on? It's almost as if you can worry about more than a thing at a time, but that's just a ludicrous, of course.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:49 AM
9

Because it's tumblr.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:48 AM
21

You cut off part of the penis of a baby. Just let that go through your mind a few times. How can you not see that this is fucked up?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:35 AM
1

Ah, I saw the comment on the thread here about that picture yesterday too. Did you learn that from saint2e or directly from Vegemeister?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:19 PM
6

People like Thunderfoot I was so damn happy when he did that (the first time). I always loved and adored the guy and when all that shit went down, I kinda feared he would be drawn into it, but nope, not TF :)
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:13 PM
8

One good thing is that you could see who was a jackass. I mean, I never really cared about PZ Myers, but now I know he's a fucking idiot, so that's good.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:08 PM
5

If it were differently, then we would have to excuse all the drivers who kill people while drunk, because it's obviously not their fault
/r/MensRights05/03/14 02:55 PM
3

Still sounds more fun than my job. You also can't drink a beer at work or leave without permission. But you also can't watch cartoons all day long.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 10:46 AM
2

You're raping him right now, shitlord!
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:30 AM
8

Imagine someone is saying the title but acting out the quotation marks with his fingers
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:15 AM
2

Also speaks for the intelligence of whoever said this (I mean, besides the obvious). There are so many ways to kill oneself that don't leave any more mess than the body. Drowning, toaster in bathtub, noose, injecting air, poison, pill overdose, and the probably most pleasant way, asphyxiation through helium. And that are just some examples. Why does everyone just think of gunshot or jumping in front of trains / from buildings?
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:11 AM
3

Yeah, but do we really know if he's a harley driver?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:49 AM
19

It's not some sort of invisible marking, It is. Not invisible but so small (and yellow) you usually don't see it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_steganography
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:42 PM
6

you have 36 upvotes. looks like reddit vote fuzzing to me
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:40 AM
3

Which is exactly what MRAs try to do and feminists don't, isn't it? :) I mean, just watch that and tell me again that common feminists are pro-men too and MRAs being against them are wrong. (Disclaimer: I chose that video because it has the highlights of a wide variety of what happened there, all the vids are without a commentator on YT too)
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:30 AM
3

You really think feminists had nothing to do with that? I have read enough posts that are basically "a shelter for men? mantears bwaaah what about the menz!1!!" and things to this effect even from "high ranking" well known feminists in magazines and the like. (Don't ask for sources, I can't provide them as this is just stuff I've seen time and time again)
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:51 AM
6

Never heard of any feminist groups doing that. quite the opposite. An example, Earl Silverman made the first and only shelter for male victims of abuse in canada. He was driven to suicide from the lack of support he got.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 09:45 AM
6

really a no true scotsman there. There are plenty of feminists and feminists organisation that behave pretty much like above poster said (they may not love those inequalities but they don't act against them). It doesn't really matter if they are "true" feminists for you, it's enough that they call themselfes that and that "true feminists" fail to rally against them. Hell, it's even in the word itself.. FEMinism, claiming to fight against PATRïarchy (pater = father, male).
/r/MensRights07/11/13 07:52 AM
8

It doesn't matter what it views how in theory, it only matters what its subscribers actually do. I fail to see feminists rallying for, for example, shelters for men.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 07:47 AM
5

No we are not Source: swiss
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:17 AM
2

In another sceptics conference, maybe even the same, I don't know, they added a rule about not being offensive to anyone (including religion, FFS) largely because of radfems. Thunderfoot made a video that mentioned it, but I can't look it up right now.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:17 AM
-3

But you'll always be an insufferable douche. Look at all that projecting, isn't it cute?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:53 AM
-1

Yeah, your analogy fails on several levels, mainly the difference of work, time and cost. (downloading and installing: a couple of seconds, free, just like fetching something from the fridge, but very much unlike going to a store, buying it and cooking it) Congrats on being so stubborn in your mac ways though
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:12 AM
5

women are also predisposed to want sex or else humanity would have never happened because we would have died out millions of years ago
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:51 AM
-4

BioGenx2b: "If you're hungry, get a yoghurt" Stratisphear: "That only works in my house. You need to get a special container for it in this house" psilorder: "You just have to go to the fridge to fetch it for free" Stratisphear: "Wow. If I'd known that were true, I would have said something like 'You need to get a special container for it in this house'. But clearly you read my comment and didn't see that, so it must not have been there, right?"
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:28 AM
1

Firstly, if I could get a job that pays enough that I still could life somewhat confortably and have more free time, I would, I need no comic for that Secondly, what has this to do with MR? Can we now just post random comics here and get hundreds of upvotes?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:45 AM
2

Of course he writes like this. If he diddn't, he would be fired from feministthoughtblogs, like everyone else critical of femnazis
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:22 PM
2

yeah, I did, back when I still tought it was about equality. But I won't call myself MRA either, I'm just egalitarian
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:18 PM
5

with the goal being to collaboratively write feminist thinking into the site RationalWiki anyone? It's sad what happened to it after "feminist thinking" was written into it, making it useless
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:13 AM
13

This is racist. I kid
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:02 AM
1

you got me wrong, I'm not saying you're wrong, I just went ranting a bit because you some times you just have to ;)
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:12 AM
1

I never said men were to blame. I just said christianity wasn't. It'0s the sexism in the court system, not in the church. And I say that as an antitheist atheist
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:10 AM
1

oh man revelance. It's what basically destroyed the german wikipedia. If something is even a little bit obscure, it will not be in the german one. hell, even my birth town, a small one in a small country (that is german speaking) has a two-sentence-entry in the german one but a full-blown page with pictures and all in the english one. It's gone so far that I stopped even looking in the german one and go directly to the english one, despite not being my first language. The obmission of MR stuff i…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:37 PM
1

Well, you can hate feminists all you want, but churches are sexist.. and blaming men for divorces is hardly because of christianity and more because of custody proceedings which are sexist, I'd guess.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:32 PM
5

with your logic, you also couldn't say something against KKK because they're mostly made up of white people (also a race)
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:59 PM
7

You don't understand what a race is, do you? To quote dawkins himself, "Am I surprised? Only at the number of people who seem to think Islam is a race, rather than a religion. I regard that view as racist. Anything you can convert to, or convert from, is NOT a race."
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:33 PM
2

Feminism pretty much destroyed the Christian community ...what?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:25 PM
2

so you're skeptic towards skepticism? Good for you!
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:24 PM
2

but isn't that why they made atheism+? because most normal atheist diddn't buy their shit? I was never a heavy follower of it, but that's the feeling I got
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:16 PM
6

Muslims are neither a gender nor a race
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:07 PM
12

I'm mostly sad about what happened to rationalwiki.org Not too long ago, this was a great source of information, but now it's infested with feminism bullshit. Just look at the article about TF - the majority of it is not about his work or his videos but just about the vids and context of what you posted above. Of course, they stay completely unbiased he behaved like an asshole, stepping into a controversy over harassment policies and feminism like a bull in a china shop or not. I liked this wiki…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:01 PM
9

I know /r/atheism is an easy target on reddit, but.. well, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:44 PM
4

PZ has been a joke at least since elevatorgate. Maybe even before, diddn't watch the guy too closely
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:42 PM
10

you see, SRS would just make a bunch of throwaways (even more than before), they don't learn. If they don't know they were banned, they would still try posting/downvoting with their old account, which wouldn't have any result anymore
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:14 PM
8

You diddn't source your facts. If you linked statistics, your point about women doing the easier jobs would have been better.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:08 AM
2

Diddn't mean that as a "post it there", more as a "go there if you want to see how bad tumblr can get" - your post fits here better than there
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:37 PM
7

/r/TumblrInAction That's all
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:01 PM
2

hmm, ok. Seems kinda weird that there is apparently a significant number of women being forced to stick dildoes in their attackers bum tough.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:19 AM
1

they kinda lack a penetrating tool.. or does this include fingering/dildos?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:09 AM
3

Dumb question, but "Made to penetrate, female victim" - how does this work? Or is "penetrated" meant in that case?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:15 AM
28

"He who fights monsters should see to it that he himself does not become a monster." Also Nietzsche and the sentence right in front of the abyss one (full quote is "He who fights monsters should see to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.")
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:35 AM
1

That's kinda sad actually. We should be better than the downvote brigade that is SRS, even if we think some of the upvoted stuff there is stupid..
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:54 AM
3

Reading to the thread over at /r/feminism was weird. I diddn't expect the "He's obviously guilty"- people being downvoted so heavely. I wonder if that is just the effect of linking it here
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:31 PM
5

Tue, but "made to stay at home"? Seems to be a decision she made
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:07 AM
3

Atheism+ is basically normal Atheism + radfems Further information provided by the great Thunderf00t (I love that guy): Why 'Feminism' is poisoning Atheism part 1 / part 2 (Atheism+ is, in name, only mentioned once or twice, but you'll see what it is about anyway)
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:51 AM
2

Not neccessarily. Not everyone on reddit is from america. Of course she could just have googled it, tough.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:50 AM
2

What, exactly, has that to do with the comment you answered to?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:41 AM
10

You are overreacting and kind of a dick.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:36 AM
5

Was he drafted? No? Then this post fails. His wounds aren't there because he is a man but because he decided to become a soldier
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:55 AM
6

Do not generalize a whole gender. You're the reason this subreddit is seen as a haven for misogynists even by people who don't call all men that.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:52 AM
46

#trigger warning Seriously?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:10 PM
2

Oh, we do. Usual response: "Well, but we have to give birth, which is painfull, so it's fair!", nevermind that that is a choice and they don't have to.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:58 AM
2

If you live in other countries, like Switzerland, you are not obligated to enlist for the draft. No. You have a lovely concept called conscription. That means every person, as long as he is bodily able, has to serve in the military. Oh wait, not every person. Just the males.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:23 PM
1

Dude, calm down. And if you are being slapped while driving, you are in real danger because you're driving a vehicle full of people. It doesn't even matter how hard the lap might have been, as a distraction alone could kill you.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:06 PM
-3

/r/atheism is bad! and a circlejerk! CHOO CHOO!
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:10 PM
0

doesn't for me and I seem to have the current version..
/r/MensRights25/09/12 09:55 AM
4

I first looked trough the pictures in RES and tought you were the father (Dante sounds male after all) and the father was that old guy and had no idea who the other girl was.. RES needs to implement imgur texts
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:27 AM
2

You do realize that everyone knows you are at most 15 year old? Tell me more about how much of a man you are, kiddo.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:10 AM
3

You realize that stuff like this is making all of us look bad? Or is that the reason you posted it?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:44 AM
3

Thank you for explaining it here, so others don't have to google. Oh wait... MGTOW: Men Going Their Own Way. basically anti-marriage from what I can see.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:04 PM
3

10$ that this post said something entirely different before.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:56 AM
13

I dunno.. Nice tought but badly executed. The text going over the line, welgare, too unspecific ("is presumed guilty" is not really true, it depends on the type of the case), weird phrasing ("has his worth determined worthless"), has multiple points that have nothing to do with the "right to his body"..
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:34 AM
11

As far as I remember, the original poster, which caused this, has had an "Only men can stop rape" part, which is probably why MaunaLoona said that EDIT: OK it doesn't. Must've been another poster
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:09 PM
5

Ok then :) It's a case of Poe's law - a sarcasm indicator like /s or the irony mark ؟ would probably have helped a bit
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:31 AM
3

basically, what he is saying is that it isn't a femicide
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:54 AM
1

Why does this take so long to load? Ah wait.. wait what, a redditor using imageshack? So it has come to this!
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:56 PM
1

Do not commit suicide this christmas. Wait until sylvester!
/r/MensRights23/12/11 08:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter