TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kaian-a-coel Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by kaian-a-coel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The french version is more sensible, literally translated it's "having the butter and the butter's money" (as in, buying something and still having the money used to buy it)
/r/MensRights08/03/21 01:29 PM
5

The appendice isn't useless either. AFAIK it's a gut flora backup, and possibly other things.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 09:22 PM
13

The pancreas is far from useless. If it breaks, you get diabetes.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 09:17 PM
6

While the population today is double that which it was as recently as the fifties, a thanos snap would definitely send us back way, way further back, because everything is hyperspecialised and reliant on many other things that are themselves reliant on many others. Even if you are very particular about who gets snapped, shit is going to break and break hard. Sure at one point the cathedral of notre dame had half the stones it has today, but if you remove half of these stones now it's going down …
/r/MensRights09/02/21 09:32 PM
65

It's closer to 400-1 actually.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:09 PM
3

Ngl Trudeau has been a complete clown, as far as foreign relations date concerned at least. Here in france we didn't appreciate his victim blaming after the recent terrorist attacks. Fucking clown alright.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 03:23 PM
5

Men can find themselves in one on one situations with bigger stronger men too.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:52 PM
12

The statements lack a neutral/unsure position on the agree/disagree slide, and the wording is such that agreement or disagreement still leaves a lot of room for interpretation and bias. Bad survey.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 02:40 PM
1

'I've never been on mens rights, but i've been told Oh some come here alright, but they only see what they want to see. They'll look at the same thing we look at, and where we see civil discussion they genuinely see hatred, sexism, and/or fascism, white supremacy, etc. It's bewildering and honestly quite depressing.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:13 PM
2

They replaced a group of commando raiding a nazi factory in scandinavia with women, IIRC.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 09:56 PM
1

Happened to Solo already. Word is, between the extensive reshoots, a general lack of interest, and TLJ's impact, it lost money.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 09:53 PM
1

They have to ask the opposition for permission to present evidence to the judge? That's one of the most retarded things I've heard this month!
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:37 AM
3

"Survivors do not lie" But people who aren't survivors can lie about being one. That's what a false accusation is! They aren't a survivor if the assault did not fucking happen!
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:54 PM
5

It's great, and I'll try to add my own layman musings on it. False accusations probably belong in "faced trial", since a trial is probably necessary to conclusively prove their innocence instead of throwing it out as inconclusive, but I understand why he'd put it in a general inconclusive bloc. "why wouldn't inconclusive case follow the conclusive cases ratio of innocence/guilt" For a whole host of reasons, and you could just as easily argue for the entire inconclusive bloc to be innocent imo. I…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:24 AM
2

It's like the law. You cannot pursue someone for an action he commited before that action was made illegal. You can retract consent midway through sex, hereby making further action illegal (because rape). But anything that happened before that retractation cannot be treated as criminal.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:38 PM
1

Think of all the funding space agencies would get to prevent that from happening again
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:02 PM
15

What the fuck? Who thought it was a good idea to base the court's pay on the outcome of the trials?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:11 PM
8

Yes, of course, explain to me in detail exactly how fortified your goddamn motte is, this will surely refute my point. Which is that there is two definition of toxic masculinity. One to be used when not challenged about it, and one when you're being called out about being a sexist cunt, to insist that no, you're not actually being a sexist cunt. But by all mean, keep repeating the second one like a broken record.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:24 PM
11

This seems to be a misunderstanding of the term. I haven't seen anyone referring to all blackness as inherently toxic (although I'm sure someone will now link an example). The term refers to a toxic subset of black behaviours, such as being "gangsta" and not obeying the law. Does that sounds like a racist trying to backpedal his way out of calling black people names? Because it sure does to me, and it works the same way for any race or gender.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:06 AM
20

The bailey is "masculinity is toxic". Aka men are inherently bad. It's indefensible, but ideologically valuable. The motte is "some men are bad people in some ways". Completely unattackable, but also worthless. Because really, what's the point of calling a subset of bad behaviours "toxic masculinity" if not to attack masculinity as a whole? If I called city-gang behaviour "toxic blackness", or infanticide "toxic femininity", that would be seen as a racist attack on all black people, or a sexist …
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:04 AM
1

Compared to that male ideal I think "high libido but exclusive relationship" isn't too much to ask.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:25 PM
38

This is motte-and-bailey arguing. Textbook.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:36 PM
5

I like how you give the alleged rapist the benefit of the doubt here and not the women who were victims Because that's how presumption of innocence works. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 07:36 PM
19

dyed her hair red. Litteral red flag right there.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:39 PM
1

I don't think you'd get more than fifteen minutes of disjointed shit if you tried to do that. The film wouldn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:30 PM
20

Circular reasoning.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:34 PM
1

Inta-deleted by mods, calling it now.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 12:40 PM
7

I can't even try, I've been pre-emptively banned.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:46 AM
26

And then we get videos beating us over the head over how little boys pulling little girls' hair because they like them is evil patriarchy...
/r/MensRights18/07/17 11:00 PM
2

Alternatively give all three a fucking ticket so they can get inside the stadium and get a seat instead of watching from outside like goddamn barbarians.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:39 PM
20

r/nocontext?
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter