TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kalanosh Archive

View 1 post and 22 comments by kalanosh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
76

kalanosh/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

This sounds hateful. I don't need to go around worrying that ALL the women are going to lie and say that. You think all women are evil and vengeful and want to put you away?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:14 AM
-2

Really what are you doing in HR? HR isn't to assume actions, that puts them into bad situations. It is to foresee such incidents form damaging the company morale and image. Guy can be put into a bad position where if you discipline them and they don't like it, our society favors the woman. Sure it can be visa versa too, you could use your power role on her. That is why the law quid pro quo came about. Lots of reason she would say that, the least of the intention is a double standard.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:12 AM
1

Though this article brings up a few unneeded points, we are a animal and changes like this does affect the balance of humans. They can have little to drastic impacts...as the section for the article says, room for debate. Honestly it's a burden for all of us, longevity suites individuals self-fish need to live longer than our usefulness. Being retired sure, being retired and winding down for how long? It's an economical burden, it can be a family burden, and among others. This is were we join th…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:07 AM
2

Seriously, and what made it worse was menrights is about protecting our rights, it seems like that was to attack woman. Women didn't believe, but the first male did. That how we create more friction.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:36 AM
3

You sexual promiscuity shouldn't be used to disprove a rape but rather use to prove a rape. If a women never takes a man home with here that would be uncharacteristic to have that man in her house. On the flip side if a women ALWAYS takes a man home with her it simply establishes the likely hood that she invited him in, or brought him home to maybe participate in such activities. But that doesn't mean she wasn't raped. If she stated she never took him home or invited him over, that might make it…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:47 AM
1

Anecdotal Evidence is not factual. Car Insurance make money on taking calculated risks, not stupid risks. They have statistics to constantly back up their long term risk investments. Statistics doesn't discriminate, there is a hard number that they can come up with and can clearly see that mean between 16-25 are more likely to get into an accident and they can clearly see that the same risk is significantly lower for women over 21. If men as a whole drove better and we could prove the gender, wh…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:33 AM
–

Telling someone how to be careful is not saying its their fault. Some people may say that and so when others argue that they are called "victim blamers". Reality is we say things to help protect people. If I am about to walk down a creepy alley late at night I am gonna take a longer route. I always carry a bulky wallet so I can try to stop pick pocketers. I hide my stuff in my car when I leave it unattended so no one finds it inviting to break in. If someone breaks into my car, or stabs me in th…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:53 AM
1

I guess I misunderstood you, I interpreted your comment about Stated as if we don't get it. The states don't have that law.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:20 AM
1

If woman are absolve of their consent when drunk then drunk driver should be absolves of their action when driving drunk. Get that logic? it's the same, think about? He had alcohol in him and was unable to make the right decision so he drove, it wasn't his fault he didn't consent to his brains actions.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:39 AM
1

I do not support that. I just wouldn't call it rape. I think it's still wrong but it should be a civil matter not criminal. I think that is akin to saying "he asked several times after I said no if he could kill me...I finally gave in and said yes." There is not logic in that. Person doing the killing is wrong, but he's not a murder, it's assisted suicide. That how ridiculous the other sounds, they can walk away from the situation. That puts it in there hands as much as the guys.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:19 AM
0

You logic is sound. Thank you for the insight. It seems a lot of people think that way, but even a few comments here disturb me.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:15 AM
1

Well only if they actively participate in the sex, then yes I agree. Just to be clear just so I don't misunderstand you though, drunk or not, rape is rape. If you choose to get drunk and get rape, that's not your fault. But if you choose to get drunk and "fuck" someone, that is your fault. I agree there.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:14 AM
1

Yes. Consent can be withdrawn at anytime regardless of "circumstances", No is NO. Withdrawing consent is still a NO and if someone continues then yes that deserve criminal punishment.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:11 AM
1

That's an easy option for me. But when I was younger and I was drunk that not how two people horny for each other see it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:05 AM
1

Still an issue, why should the the question not not be asked to him? If she had sex with him too isn't she sexually assault him you? I would argue this: If two people actively participate in sex, and consented, then they are both having sex. That is not rape. Under Canada Laws If two drunken people actively participate in sex, and consented, then they are both having sex. This is considered rape by the man. Because I guess only men have sex and woman are just taking it. Think about that.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:49 AM
1

Of course and I hope no one geniuly argues against that. Also agree, i do not think it's black and white. But I would say the threshold is more obvious than people like to believe.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:45 AM
3

No not if you physically couldn't walk away and you said no. That's rape. I am sorry you've had those experience and think it's ok. Those guys were wrong and needed judgment.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:03 PM
7

I agree with you 100%. Fair game idea is so off the mark. No is still no.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:01 PM
5

I just read it doing a search. My bad. Just trying to share a frustration. Didn't know my frustration should disappear when I read the post date. Although you do inadvertentlymake a good point, this was the attitude five years ago and it only seem to be getting more relevant and worse.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:26 AM
6

Kinda. More sleep deprived. The article I linked to was suppose to be a simple discussion of how far is too far when someone is drunk. It definitely turned into a scenario where all the comments seemed to be center around "the man should no better drunk or not". It' seems that anyone should be allow to call in drunk rape or not. As if they have the sole power to wake up the next morning and then decide if someone actions where irresponsible. Where I believe there is a clear definition of rape, a…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:24 AM
1

True...I did say that it is unnecessary now, and arguing why it's evil or not isn't productive anymore since I agree that it should be phased out, and as people take the roles of medical heads from each subsequent generation you will see those changes. (btw using emotion for why something is wrong like evil isn't a valid argument)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:37 AM
–

Wait what? Who is cool with Male Genital Mutilation?? Wait the circumcision debate? Give it a rest, it will pass with time. I am circumcised, I am healthy functioning adult. I think it always a uncircumcised vs circumcised...either side doesn't see it from the other. But the evidence says that it was once thought needed to help hygiene and became a standard. It will fade with time, but arguing about it like a dead fucking horse is insane. Things take time to change, it's not a quick process. Why…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter