kami232 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	Emma Watson called out in the New York Post You are technically correct - the best kind of correct!	/r/MensRights	30/09/14 08:14 AM
0	The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus life U of Arizona Greek here - Right there with you, brother.	/r/MensRights	26/09/14 09:45 AM
2	Millionaire mom murders autistic son + uses feminist defense at trial: "the mens made me do it!" I read that in The Honorable Judge Whitey's voice. I also thought this was /r/TheOnion until I clicked the link. That article made me sick.	/r/MensRights	15/09/14 05:53 AM
1	No more Male Spaces! Despite having womens only gyms and spas, it's apparently not acceptable to have a male only barber. The sheer foolishness is bad enough, but it's the hypocrisy of allowing women Just so long as I can bring my Pale Ales, Lagers, and my trusty Guinness. We'll get Sterling Archer to tend the bar.	/r/MensRights	05/09/14 06:47 AM
2	My school is offering girls a day at DESY, boys arent allowed to participate. Maybe I can archieve something by speaking to the school director (head teacher? dont know if its the right word), I will give it a try. President Dean of Students Principal (aka headmaster or head teacher... not sure if that's the director you're thinking of though) That's the order of operations (top to bottom) for the schools here in the US. I'd definitely try to talk to the principal, then the dean, and then the president. Work your way up and voice the concern. Maybe one of them will take a…	/r/MensRights	04/09/14 08:19 PM
3	No more Male Spaces! Despite having womens only gyms and spas, it's apparently not acceptable to have a male only barber. The sheer foolishness is bad enough, but it's the hypocrisy of allowing women To each his own. I'm not here to judge, unless you're into that kind of thing.	/r/MensRights	04/09/14 07:57 PM
3	My school is offering girls a day at DESY, boys arent allowed to participate. Holy crap, reading that poster hurt my eyes once I turned away - that shade of pink and white should never be a thing. I want to talk to that graphic designer for blinding me... On that note... my German is decently rusty. What I got out of it is like what you said ("Women interested in math, information, science, and technology are able to register for a visit to DESY!") and that it's a national program through "Komm mach, MINT" - which appears to be the German equivalent of STEM. Right? Here i…	/r/MensRights	04/09/14 06:13 PM
8	No more Male Spaces! Despite having womens only gyms and spas, it's apparently not acceptable to have a male only barber. The sheer foolishness is bad enough, but it's the hypocrisy of allowing women a bar stocked with fine whiskeys, scotch, gin and rum. Woah woah woah. Some of us like beer too, sir! Craft brewed beers are becoming far more common, and they definitely warrant a gentleman's club.	/r/MensRights	04/09/14 05:50 PM
12	5 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die the modern feminist movement provokes a response that advocates genuine oppression. That's a reactionary idea, and it doesn't fall in line with what's actually going on in the Western World - the US, Canada, UK, and France (for example) are extraordinarily geared towards female support; In the US alone, the "Gender Wage Cap" is still quoted as if it was gospel by President Obama, The First Lady, and the assumed Democratic Party Nominee for 2016 (Hillary Clinton). Yes, the Men's Rights Movement i…	/r/MensRights	02/09/14 07:35 PM
2	These are, apparently, not the rapes the feminists are looking for. TIL Jezebel is run by Cylons. Thanks for doing a quick search though! Anyways, Users like Baskandpurr already gave a great explanation of the issue. The whole situation is fucked up... I'm more shocked that I'm not shocked at the level of hypocrisy by those "news" groups.	/r/MensRights	31/08/14 06:50 PM
9	Feminists blame Mens Rights for MMA fighter John 'War Machine' Koppenhaver brutally beating up his ex: "All MRA's want to rape women" etc. You didn't open the door! - Misogyny! You opened the door! - Misogyny! You bought me dinner! - Misogyny! You didn't buy me dinner! - Misogyny! At this point, I just do things that I think are appropriate, like opening the door anyways. And if they chew me out for being polite, I shut it in their face. Not my fault if they can't comprehend and appreciate common courtesy.	/r/MensRights	21/08/14 05:22 PM
1	I'm not an MRA and I've never posted here before. However, after the recent gaming drama I don't know where to ask this: Are journalists and other figures self-censoring at all costs to avoid potential social justice backlash? I sell life insurance. If I went around saying "I'll sell you a $1,000,000 policy if we have sex" I might very well sell a fuckton of policies, but it's unethical because the sale is conditional on sex. I'm legally bound by ethics laws. If I did shit like that, I'd not only lose my license before I could say a damned thing, I'd probably end up in prison for a long time. First: I'm not saying ethics laws should be bound to all careers. I understand that life insurance has ethics laws to protect c…	/r/MensRights	20/08/14 07:46 PM
12	I'm not an MRA and I've never posted here before. However, after the recent gaming drama I don't know where to ask this: Are journalists and other figures self-censoring at all costs to avoid potential social justice backlash? Zoe Quinn should be getting blown the fuck out by feminists for compromising feminist values for personal gain, they should be on her case for using feminism and false flag harassment to enrich herself and raise her profile. They should be using their outrage machine to out her as a fraud, a liar and a damaging factor to women in the industry. Prominent feminist gamers should be outraged at her "do as I say, not as I do" behavior. Instead, they're lock step behind her. Why? I can't help but feel…	/r/MensRights	20/08/14 07:19 PM
2	It's like they cover their ears when told that women aren't oppressed We are on completely different pages No shit. She's reading page 1776 and we're reading page 2014. She's got over 200 pages to go.	/r/MensRights	19/08/14 04:15 PM
2	I love how much the truth encourages conversation But others who see them might just click them. And if we provide sources to back up our statements and the other side doesn't, then they either click our sources or no sources... Not much of a loss there. Bottom line: always be ready to cite your sources, or just do it anyways.	/r/MensRights	19/08/14 07:00 AM
4	"Feminism is for everyone" toe* The idiom means "walk the ideological path."	/r/MensRights	17/08/14 11:35 PM
3	The “Affirmative Consent” Trap: California lawmakers take on “rape culture” at the expense of rights As written, SB 967 offers an unsettlingly vague definition of “affirmative consent.” Such consent, the bill’s language states, “means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” So unless she's screaming "fuck me!" "yes!" "oh god yes!" "oh fuck yes!" the entire time like a pornstar, she's being raped... I like the author's final comments: In our postmodern age, sexual assault has come to mean practically any unwanted, unexpected, or regretted sexual encounter—t…	/r/MensRights	21/07/14 06:31 PM
2	Men's Rights post on /r/todayilearned was deliberately removed by the mods. Apparently part of the active reddit censorship that's going on, exposed on /r/undelete. You should take a look. Well, u/SpiritualSuccessors quoted the report that got his/her post taken down in r/undelete... ... fortunately, I found u/SS's repost is still alive and well on the front page of TIL today. Also now there's this TIL about how TIL rape in the US has been declining rapidly for 40 years which cites the graph on the wiki page. Some positive news at least.	/r/MensRights	07/07/14 03:41 PM
2	White House Releases Proposals on Campus Sexual Assault Ugh... text section bugged out... thankfully I had most of it saved! The White House launches the website NotAlone.gov as a means for students to "find resources related to sexual assault, including how to file federal complaints with the Department of Education and search for statistics about sexual violence at their particular schools." This launch is coupled with its recommendations for addressing sexual assault in schools Plus side: It's good that the White House is concerned with sexual ass…	/r/MensRights	29/04/14 06:13 PM
1	White House Says Wage Gender Gap Stats Are Misleading...When Applied to the White House Actually the Republicans lost seats in the House during the last cycle, yet they still hold a slim majority (53%) at the moment. The trick with the current state of affairs is this does enable the GOP to obstruct the hell out of the Democrats (particularly Mr. Obama). F**king obstructionism.	/r/MensRights	10/04/14 01:40 AM
–	White House Says Wage Gender Gap Stats Are Misleading...When Applied to the White House Democrats do badly in non-Presidential elections ELI5 style for those who are confused by this - a part of the reason why the GOP "tends to do better" in non-Presidential elections (read: congressional elections) is because of Gerrymandering: it is the concept of creating voting districts that leave the target party in 50%+1 control of the district (ie: get a majority the easiest way possible: 50%+1 of the vote -- an even higher buffer is acceptable). So in effect, the GOP has worked to get cont…	/r/MensRights	08/04/14 08:39 PM
1	Men are better equipped than women to deal with all sorts of situations and better able to adjust, which is a sign of intelligence. Also don't try to discuss it with them on r/Feminism. Or r/Politics. Or on r/News. Or on Reddit.com for that matter. Instead, if you want to have this discussion with people, my recommendation is to do it in person. People tend to be more rational when they can't hide behind an alias. And if they aren't, then you know who to avoid next time, eh?	/r/MensRights	05/04/14 02:31 AM
9	Men are better equipped than women to deal with all sorts of situations and better able to adjust, which is a sign of intelligence. SRS is pretty much the Westboro Baptist Church of Reddit. Best summary ever.	/r/MensRights	05/04/14 02:21 AM
2	Feminist declares that hearing men who find deaf women attractive merely fetishize them as "submissive and dependent" What I find wierd is the nation is trying to expand marriage equality and life choices for all it's citizenry. Feminists want to limit straight men's choices. FTFY In any rate, you might notice that behavior is strange; what's worse is you might notice it's not largely reported, let alone discussed. The short answer is it's not widely reported because the media doesn't see a profitable story in the notion that straight men in America (or even the world) can be victims of discrimination - sadly, …	/r/MensRights	30/03/14 10:16 AM
6	1 page of my assigned reading for a required class. Apparently, being a housewife is comparable to being a "prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp." Disagree, sir. The submitted post was about an erroneous correlation between the Holocaust and women at home. Then 5th Law brought us into this notion that only men suffer from the World Wars; Holocaust issues aside, once we got into this false notion that all men were forced into war, the door was opened to a discussion on how WW2 impacted human lives. That means the issues that impacted both men and women are equally valid. That is why I brought up the global, cross gender issues of combat. I …	/r/MensRights	20/03/14 09:13 PM
–	1 page of my assigned reading for a required class. Apparently, being a housewife is comparable to being a "prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp." Men were fully humanized during wwii. They were forced in to identical uniforms, given numbers and ranks, had their heads shaved and were sent to die against their will. That final part is turning this into an episode of r/BadHistory and it really needs to stop. Your entire argument (intentionally?) ignores the very idea that men could and did volunteer for armed service in all of the nations. Yes, there was conscription, but there were plenty of volunteers. If you really want to make the "soldi…	/r/MensRights	20/03/14 04:51 PM
9	David Wong & friends censor Anita Sarkeesian's art theft debacle, claim it being a "MRA conspiracy" (xpost from /r/tumblrinaction) OK, putting some context on this, because this was begging for a source: Here's the original artwork listed in an open accusation on the original artist's (Tamara Smith) site with another instance of the image on Tamara Smith's blog. Here's Anita Sarkeesian's Kickstarter page. Can confirm: that's the same image. If Ms. Sarkeesian used that image without permission, that is copyright infringement. How the fuck is this a "slanderous, malicious MRA campaign?!" This looks like a textbook copyright c…	/r/MensRights	12/03/14 01:48 AM
1	To those who have arrived here for the first time because of the SNL sketch... Welcome. Please join the discussion. I think you're missing his point - he's saying that modern feminism is a bigoted, sexist platform which is the antithesis of a progressive social justice society (something the Democrats in the US support). He wants us to stop associating feminism with the social justice platforms, because once we stop equating feminism with social justice it's easier to note that feminism is bigoted -- work with me here: "Mr. Smith, would you like to support Feminism, the social justice platform?" vs "Mr. Smith…	/r/MensRights	09/03/14 09:53 PM
6	One man's View: Just a note to Feminists who are all about breaking gender roles Foreign brides and mail order brides are not the same as "dating Asian women." That's a specific statement that really needed to be in there, and it's why I was confused - many of my friends have dated ethnic Asians, and even a few foreign exchange students (I'm from California; it's a growing Asian population). edit: If dating Asian Americans is degrading other American women, then that's a completely asinine argument. That said, I appreciate the in depth answer.	/r/MensRights	08/03/14 08:00 AM
3	One man's View: Just a note to Feminists who are all about breaking gender roles Wait why is dating Asian women a big deal?	/r/MensRights	08/03/14 07:37 AM
3	Tumblr Delivers Pt. 2 Aye, it's a small subreddit. Things can change, eh?	/r/MensRights	06/03/14 11:44 AM
14	Tumblr Delivers Pt. 2 Effectively, yes. Funny enough, they mention us and the feminists in equal acknowledgement on their page (r/egalitarianism). I've stalked it as long as I have stalked this subreddit; some of its posts intertwine with our own. Egalitarian doctrines maintain that all humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status. Even /r/MensRights and /r/Feminism. I know somebody's going to read this and go "bullshit! Feminism is about superiority!" Well, if we want to destroy a superiority platform, the…	/r/MensRights	06/03/14 05:25 AM
5	Chivalry is dead and feminism is to blame - The risk of being accused of sexism makes men think twice before helping women The EverydaySexism Twitter account used to be my favourite guilty pleasure. But is its hyena-pack mentality while outing men’s half-witted, graceless, must-try-harder shortfalls a form of sexism in itself? Just looked this up. Why is this a thing?! I just read some of these to test the waters, and my conclusion: Everything is sexist in their eyes. Hyena-pack mentality indeed. Back on track - nice article. Spot on with how I've been feeling lately.	/r/MensRights	20/02/14 12:27 AM
1	Women can't be sexist So if a white man insults a black man, it's worse than the inverse? Justifying racism in any capacity is an insult to common decency. The same is true with sexism - it's not OK to be sexist to women, but the moment anybody even dares mention how women can be sexist towards men they're labeled as some "not worth the time" misogynist. The name of the game is to degrade, to devalue. The moment we start claiming one is worse than the other, or it's OK sometimes... we set up a society that is OK with…	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 06:28 AM
5	Women can't be sexist Gonna take the context to another relevant point now: There is no such thing as reverse racism or reverse sexism Aye, it's right there - it's just racism and sexism across the board. Calling it "reverse" anything is trying to dance around a PC agenda; it implies racism and sexism have different values based on who the parties are. Bullshit. Racism is racism; sexism is sexism. And then the rest of the statement takes a giant dump.	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 02:52 AM
1	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men I would like to point out how ironic it is that you accuse me of a straw man when you couldn't be bothered to even confirm your distorted-ass conception of what you thought I was saying. Uh, yes I have: you don't want this to be a GOP circle jerk. Not sure how many times I need to repeat the obvious with you. For the record - I don't think the MRAs should associate with any party; I like the article we're supposed to be talking about, because it shows how there are people who want a bi-partisan …	/r/MensRights	05/02/14 07:59 AM
-1	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men Go. Fuck. Yourself. You fucking asshole. Funny that. You're the one who brought in senseless banter and insults. Semi-reasonable points, eh? Great job trying to quantify your bull. I see you found dynamite to keep digging yourself a hole now that you've hit rock bottom.	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 09:43 PM
-1	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men Says the guy who keeps flinging bullshit. Irony?	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 09:40 PM
1	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men You're seeing Republican love letters where they don't exist. Arakin wants the middle way, not the Right way or the Left way. I still don't get how you only see demons here.	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 09:37 PM
1	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men Straw man much? I'm here for a discussion rights, not to hold hands and blindly follow your erroneous notion.	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 09:11 PM
7	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men "Maybe" you misinterpreted the statement? Hah! That's the most pathetic attempt I'm going to intercept for a Pick Six since Sunday. Damn right I'm calling your shit out. Your "point" is you claimed he was making this into a right wing circle jerk. I immediately called out your bullshit because calling out Dems isn't immediately a love letter to the GOP (as you would imply) - and now you're questioning my integrity and intelligence for this?? I'm sorry, I thought we weren't Feminists (how's that …	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 08:53 PM
19	Obama Blocks White House Council on Boys and Men So, because MRAs note that the Democrats in the US got in bed with the Feminists, we suddenly want to go full blown Republican? Fucking. False. Dilemma. This is not a black-or-white issue. Stop it. You're flat out ignoring the truth of what Arakin is stating: The Feminists are in bed with the Democrats. This is a simple truth: When a lobby that represents a single gender is in bed with a political party, that party begins representing the sole gender. And that's backlash that is starting to hurt…	/r/MensRights	04/02/14 05:25 PM
2	When women shout down good advice on rape, no one is safe \| The Sunday Times Eh, I for one believe we can't stop stupid people from talking (and I fervently defend free speech) - I just believe in yelling even louder than those idiots and also using comedy to make fun of them.	/r/MensRights	03/02/14 07:59 AM
3	When women shout down good advice on rape, no one is safe \| The Sunday Times It's nice to see there are still rational people in the world. I just wish they had louder voices.	/r/MensRights	02/02/14 09:44 PM
5	Obama just repeated his 77 cent figure at the State of the Union It’s time to do away with workplace policies that belong in a “Mad Men” episode. What does that even mean?! The show emphasizes the relationships between men and women, social change, the workplace of the '60s, hard working men and women, more social change (civil rights and such), and the expanding role of women in the work place (increasing - also social change). Does he even watch Mad Men?! Or is this just another bs piece of rhetor-- ohh... right...	/r/MensRights	29/01/14 05:19 AM
17	I used to think Wil Wheaton was cool Edit: u/PartyTime86 linked us to the gal's twitter; the one who Mr. Wheaton was responding to. So that's where I found who she really is. We're taking twitter seriously? First red flag: the person Wil Wheaton was posting to has a twitter bio stating the following: Mom. Wife to @franksquatch. Writer. Attorney. Spiritual. Liberal. Feminist. Pro-Equality. Veggiesaurus. So she has the privilege of being a well educated attorney who spends her days writing at her own choice. She has the right to vote…	/r/MensRights	21/01/14 10:01 AM
4	Colleges Worried That Men Accused of Sexual Assault Might Receive Due Process Depends on the phase - the police are supposed to investigate a rape report and deem if there is enough evidence and/or accusations to make an arrest (ie: victim has identified a suspect; dna came back from a rape-kit test); in a legal battle, the prosecution is supposed to deem whether or not there is enough evidence to get a jury to convict (or, what conviction can they get based on the existing evidence) - so, did the identified suspect actually do it based on the evidence.	/r/MensRights	19/01/14 09:39 PM
15	Question from a Muslim guy.... No. My understanding of Islam teaches that women are sacred and should be protected and cared for; their maidenhood is a part of that sanctity. This is similar to the Catholic view on a woman's virginity, and women are encouraged to dress well and to be good virgins until after marriage in the Catholic Church. For the record I'm a Catholic, but every practicing Muslim woman I've met in the States is well educated and modest. They don't strike me as oppressed victims, because they aren't - If mai…	/r/MensRights	08/01/14 03:19 AM
1	“Immigrants are not the problem, men are. Deport all men from Sweden immediately.” - Magda Rasmusson, Swedish politician of the green party. (Translated website) Cheers man. That's the bits I was looking for.	/r/MensRights	05/01/14 02:49 AM
3	“Immigrants are not the problem, men are. Deport all men from Sweden immediately.” - Magda Rasmusson, Swedish politician of the green party. (Translated website) The thing is, here in sweden it is so equal between women and men that this is ridiculous. Unless you're a refugee, right? Or has the BBC misreported the disparity between the citizens and the refugees Sweden gave asylum to? I'm curious because they're my primary news source for Scandinavian happenings, and frankly watching the Swedish National Socialists has been... oddly familiar. You said "here in Sweden" - makes me think you're Swedish, right? What's been going on since those riots in May?	/r/MensRights	04/01/14 04:23 PM
1	New Jersey arrests 869 “deadbeats” for the holidays The wrong word can change the meaning in a negative way, as can poor grammar. Fixing those things is far better than redacting an insult (I for one use them when I mean them), and I recommend fixing the mistakes so your intended meaning remains. And you can do this without taking back a statement. As it stands, poor grammar and spelling makes it harder for us to understand your point. Example of what I mean: "let's eat grandma!" versus "let's eat, grandma!" - HUGE difference.	/r/MensRights	25/12/13 11:02 AM
13	New Jersey arrests 869 “deadbeats” for the holidays Then go back and edit your post to have the right word in there. It's not a crime to fix mistakes.	/r/MensRights	25/12/13 02:01 AM
4	Gloria Allred: If You're Not a Feminist, Then You're a Bigot Why defend your position when you can attack the other person's credibility, persona, or any other number of things? Classic misdirection. Unfortunately, people are more interested in appeals to emotion than facts.	/r/MensRights	25/12/13 01:37 AM
12	CNN: Should false rape accusers be sued? Well Brian Banks got a recorded confession. Written and recorded pieces of evidence go a long way to proving a person knowingly accused an innocent person.	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 02:02 AM
1	Men who prefer slim women are called shallow. 98.8% of women won't message a short man because of "biological preference." Point of curiosity - are your parents smaller people? My mother is a tiny lady, and I inherited a lot of her size. My dad was the same way until my mom got pregnant with my sister... afterwards, he kept the weight. Genetics play a lot into it, so perhaps you're just small? My "largest" has always been just a tone set of "in shape" bits. I've never been bulky. I feel like a Crannogman from ASOIAF (GOT).	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 07:59 PM
2	Men who prefer slim women are called shallow. 98.8% of women won't message a short man because of "biological preference." Or toned muscle. Most runners I know aren't heavy, they have little to no body fat, and they lack big muscle... yet they're toned to all hell and back. I was like that when I sailed in school because I'd have to do hundreds of crunches a day and do several 10-20 minute wall sits. It burns calories, and your core (the main part of sailing a CFJ/420/anythingbathtubsized) gets really tone.	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 05:33 PM
1	Men who prefer slim women are called shallow. 98.8% of women won't message a short man because of "biological preference." How are you that light. Thats way unhealthy. I'm 5'7" and I used to weigh 120 of low-fat muscle-y goodness because I had to do hundreds of crunches every day and 10-20 minute wall sits. That burns calories like a mofo, and it was the core element of our workout routine for sailing (before any of you mock its athletic level, I'd like to see you guys do a 20 minute wall sit). I wasn't bulky like the linemen on the football team, nor could I wrestle with a quarterback, but I was slender and fit - o…	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 05:11 PM
10	Male Feminist Sends Supportive Tweet and Gets Smacked Down by Other Feminists for His Efforts. (X-Post from /r/cringepics) To be fair Tumblr the internet is a breeding ground for people who legitimately think these things Fixed it for you. I like where your head's at, but the internet as a whole is the most wretched hive of scum and villainy.	/r/MensRights	09/12/13 01:02 AM
2	Movember is sexist and racist, apparently. Exactly. Yet there are people who only see hatred and racism, and they're generally ambulance chasers who can't see anything but racism; they make it an issue where it isn't. Example: A few San Diego coaches dressed up as the Jamaican Bobsled team, and now the NAACP wants them fired for using "blackface." By the way - they were in costume for a Halloween Party. And based on the photo of them in costume, it was done pretty darn well. Blackface would be if they dressed up like Uncle Tom or somethi…	/r/MensRights	01/12/13 09:36 PM
1	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Aye. I completely agree. However, regardless of the confession, Loki's point (and even mine), is we must refer to her as the accused, not the murderer. Otherwise we're a bunch of indignant hypocrites. Personally, I feel the evidence is strong enough that she'll get convicted quick enough, and I think she did it, but this is me thinking she's guilty, not me saying she's guilty. It's a distinction that we strive for with the men accused of rape or other crimes. I'm pushing for that same courtesy h…	/r/MensRights	26/11/13 03:17 AM
0	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. She confessed to pointing out the man who allegedly raped her. That is the counter-point. I could point out anybody on the street - that alone is not a murder confession let alone intent to do harm. However, the prosecution is going to associate the history of the two with the fact that after the woman pointed him out, the man was killed. The DA will say it was murder, and it's up to the jury to agree or disagree with their case. But until then, she's only accused of murder; she's not a murderer…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 08:13 PM
1	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. You're missing lokidemon's point - we get all indignant when a man accused of rape is considered guilty before a conviction is reached regardless of the evidence. Yet here people stand talking as if she is guilty because there is evidence showing she conspired to do great harm to a man, if not have him murdered - ie: the difference between murder and voluntary manslaughter, the latter of which is the plea deal she refused... so here comes the murder trial. As it stands, she's seen as innocent in…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 06:19 PM
3	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Yeah cheers. That's on me. Missed it... three times.	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 06:11 PM
3	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Actually she's being held without bail because they revoked her bail after she refused the plea deal. This is probably because the prosecution convinced the judge that she's a flight risk.	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 08:57 AM
4	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Forward: wall of text incoming. I regret nothing. Sacrifice me to the pagan gods of the north if you are inclined to fits of rage at long messages. Heheh <3 Actually, you do have a point that I didn't make: Traffic court is civil court where it's based on preponderance of evidence, not Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (Innocent until proven guilty) which is the basis of criminal court. You're confusing the two and assuming that because civil court is based upon preponderance of evid…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 08:41 AM
3	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Oh for sure, and since he's dead we'll never know the truth of the alleged rape. Good luck finding DNA evidence now.	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:20 AM
10	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. OK, during a criminal trial (edited for clarity), which in the US is a trial of your peers (fellow citizens randomly picked), the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" means that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, not the defense. Any trial for a crime requires the prosecution to show, beyond a reasonable doubt (ie: with evidence), that the accused did in fact do what they were charged of doing (murder, rape, etc). That does not mean that the police cannot arrest somebody for all…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:08 AM
4	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. You're right, only the detectives who reopened the case seem to have found enough evidence to indict her for being involved in the murder, something the DA agreed with since she's now being charged.	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 06:59 AM
50	Woman gets three man to murder her alleged rapist. There is no shortage of men willing to defend her. Perfect example of female violence by proxy and the "women are wonderful" effect. Edit: Dogcrazyjen does note they did refer to the man as her alleged rapist in the opening paragraph and two other times - I missed that, and that's on me. Point about bias redacted, mostly. My new issue is the title is misleading, because it suggests that she was raped yet she only allegedly had the man murdered. I still see bias, but it's not as bad as I initially thought. Go ahead and debate how bad that is in this case if you wish, because I'm content enough with the silver lining I see in t…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 06:58 AM
2	Woman calls ex-boyfriend and records sex with another man. Later, claims it was rape and convinces ex to murder the other man. She lies to police about relationship to ex, claims he assaulted her too, gets anonymity and no charges. He gets life sentence. Starting to beat a dead horse here. Or should we saddle up for more?	/r/MensRights	18/11/13 02:38 AM
-1	Double standards at a Universities Spotted! Facebook group This sounds legen- -dary. It's nice to see not everybody freaks out over awkward situations.	/r/MensRights	23/10/13 03:39 PM
9	Bomb hoax at school, school punishes all male students, even those not involved. (X-Post news) You mean like banning most balls from recess? /sarcasm. Where they come up with these genius ideas is beyond me.	/r/MensRights	15/10/13 08:04 PM
7	This post by a female friend of mine made me very uneasy But even sociologists note when generalizations are oversimplifications, which is what benlew is pointing out is happening when we, the members of r/mensrights, oftentimes oversimplify what we're talking about, or we generalize without citing data, or we overstate the gravity of an issue. I get his point, but I love your response - it's much needed as well.	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 07:02 PM
9	Somehow, I think this is slightly one-sided... they could have been rigging the tests. Maybe - I think the study tweet (and maybe the study) is suspect because it's showing evidence of reporting bias. The tweet begs the question about the opposite scenario: do groups with one male member perform better than all-female groups? Why aren't we seeing that? Is this a one sided scenario? What about other factors: Age? Demographic? Education? Profession? There are so many factors that can influence how men and women think. That blurb can't be trust…	/r/MensRights	25/08/13 09:10 PM
1	this breath of fresh air is currently circulating around tumblr, and is mainly propagated by young women the cases ... seem to garner so much attention The "why" is because the people in power - often times the feminist lobbyists - want rape accusations to get the media attention, the air time, and the spin to set up the discussion that women are oppressed by the patriarchy, abused by society, and hunted by lustful men [who are all rapists]. So you're right, they get the attention and it makes the issue seem far worse than it already is. 'Cause don't get me wrong, rape isn't a joke to me, but yeah.…	/r/MensRights	25/08/13 08:57 PM
1	Woman makes false rape claim, cop: 'We run into that all the time' not all feminists are like that. Exactly, Coldbeam. But I've got to piggyback on leander's point: I too wish it was the progressive, equal minded ladies that kept the reins. But in a game where the ones who care the most try the most, the feminist movement has been transformed and lead by far more aggressive people (mostly women); That's the group that propagates the hysteria.	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 03:24 PM
1	Rule update: Direct cross-linking no longer allowed SRS is like the Westboro Baptist Church... just ignore them and pretend they don't exist.	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 02:22 AM
42	Woman makes false rape claim, cop: 'We run into that all the time' Marcotte noted that "women who aren't ashamed of having sexual adventures like group sex-even ones that go bad-don't use rape accusations to cover up their choices. It's the women who are afraid they'll be called sluts if it gets out that make up these rape stories." Hilariously, a core proponent of slut-shaming is the feminist lobby. It's almost as if the implication is the "rape culture" is propagated by the feminist lobby to further their agenda... hmmm.... The victimization hysteria needs to…	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 02:12 AM
0	I seem to be the only kid in my school to notice the ridiculous amount of sexism. More books from my high school days... House on Mango Street - a story about a girl trying to find her place and some such nonsense that was apparently relevant to my life. Some story about a girl who got a perm and whined a lot was also in there... can't remember its name... might be HoMS... never bothered to finish either. Catcher in the Rye cause apparently it's edgy and controversial and such... I guess that's true if you're Mark David Champan. Moby Dick which I'd argue should be required re…	/r/MensRights	14/08/13 04:53 AM
2	I seem to be the only kid in my school to notice the ridiculous amount of sexism. Odds are the feminist camp would rally together and protest it claiming it's sexist, therefore it shouldn't exist... oh wait: it happened at ASU. Double standards and some such. There would be protests nationally if the same was done to the feminist groups at a school.	/r/MensRights	14/08/13 04:41 AM
1	I seem to be the only kid in my school to notice the ridiculous amount of sexism. Which is a gay phrase because it allows you to subtly imply you want sex from every redditor's country brother since Riding the Poe is analagous to Riding the Steer; because the only thing that comes out of Texas are steers and... well let's just say I don't see any horns. It's not in the text, but the author clearly wanted to ride the pipe. Hilarious nickname, Hamakua. Question: do your schools teach the concept of reductio ad absurdum for debate/speech classes?	/r/MensRights	14/08/13 04:27 AM
-1	Sometimes the stars align and reddit proves your point As society becomes more accepting of the concept of male rape, then I have no doubt more men will start to abuse the perception. Indeed, but how we go about educating the community (both male and female) about the seriousness about both rape and false accusations of rape will go a long way towards lessening the abuse issue you mentioned. As a way to tie in the severity of false accusations, I also believe that false accusations should carry a stricter penalty - perjury is technically a serious o…	/r/MensRights	10/08/13 06:44 PM
0	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. I get your analogy perfectly. You're implying I'd argue with them. But your analogy isn't what happened with this cop! This is black man calls cop asshole, white cop shoots unarmed man dead, black people complain, assholes like me point out he was unarmed and ambulance chasers like Al Sharpton need to get a life and stop claiming everything is racist when it isn't. If you're going to spend your time attacking me, get the facts right. The entire issue at hand is excessive use of force by police. …	/r/MensRights	06/08/13 03:51 PM
0	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. If a black man called a white cop a cracker, no shit I'd say race had a lot to do with it. But that's not what happened. Stop using extreme hypotheticals to assume I'd behave one way. Stop being the reason why this subreddit is criticized for being full of reactionary idiots.	/r/MensRights	06/08/13 08:21 AM
0	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. On the contrary, each of my citations shows how the public opinion is the police are showing a lack of judgement. You're the one who needs to show how it is if you want to maintain your argument - simply claiming something without citations to substantiate your claim is not acceptable. Edit: And further evidence to show excessive force, not gender-bias is as follows: Jose Guerena: shot dozens of times by Tucson PD after they raided the wrong home (his home) - Excessive force and a bonafide fuck …	/r/MensRights	02/08/13 10:03 PM
-1	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. Here's evidence to suggest it's not a double standard, but bad judgement and practices by police officers (these are the same links that supplement rogue's point): From 2012 Rekia Boyd Settlement Unarmed Woman Shot by Police It's not a gender issue - it's an excessive force issue: it opens the door to questioning the hiring practices and [procedural] training practices by police departments.	/r/MensRights	02/08/13 08:09 PM
1	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. To help rogue's point... here are some citations from around the net From 2012 Rekia Boyd Settlement Unarmed Woman Shot by Police It's not a gender issue - it's an excessive force issue: it opens the door to questioning the hiring practices and [procedural] training practices by police departments.	/r/MensRights	02/08/13 08:05 PM
-3	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. You're right - they are not mutually exclusive, nor am I implying they are mutually exclusive. You can't sit there and argue that it is an atrocity against men's rights just because the cop is a woman unless there is evidence to suggest she's an androphobe or a misandrist. However, checking the power of cops would be a win for men's rights and women's rights, because that gives us more protection nationally. Ergo, a win for equality; a de facto win for men.	/r/MensRights	02/08/13 07:56 PM
7	Video shows female police officer shooting and killing an unarmed man after he called her a bitch. No this is an excessive force issue. And, if you want to win more rights for men, check the system so a cop just can't shoot somebody who is [apparently] unarmed. Considering the timeline, that shooting happened extraordinarily fast so I'd argue it is excessive from what is being reported. But, the video is crap - we have a terrible angle, horrid lighting, and no indication if the suspect made any physical threats against the cop's well being. Perhaps he did, or he pulled a knife, in which case …	/r/MensRights	02/08/13 07:40 PM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege Considering he's Zeus' son, I bet he can handle it.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 02:29 PM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege Doubt it. She already posted stuff up in here stating she wants to have a legitimate discussion. A drink is a great way to help break the ice for said discussion. Plus for all I know, 'she' could be a he. Welcome to the internet: where boys are boys, girls are boys, and children are FBI agents.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 07:00 AM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege That argument is flawed considering there's evidence to suggest the benefits outweigh the cons (namely the loss of pleasure). The WSJ is quickly becoming one of my favorite news sources considering they're not biased and they often cite both sides of the argument quite well. TL;DR - pros: reduced infection rates and the reduced risk of spreading and acquiring diseases. cons: loss of [some] pleasure. But if a medical procedure that helps boys is mutilation just because something is cut off, then …	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:43 AM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege The Wall Street Journal is quickly becoming one of my favorite news sources considering how well informed and unbiased they are. They go over the pros and cons... the pros consist of reduced infection rates and there's evidence to suggest it reduces the spread of disease between partners. the #1 cons are "it's painful" and "loss of pleasure." First of all, as a man with a circumcised wedding tackle, I would like to note I have no issues with pleasure unless I wear a fracking condom. Secondly, I …	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:39 AM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege There's one in this thread up above - likewtvrman. Personally I want to buy her a drink and have a discussion on this. She seems reasonable.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:34 AM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege Thor and Hercules could kick their asses, even if The Coooooooon was hanging with Cthulhu. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:31 AM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege Hmm... considering I was talking about the old heathen gods (namely implying the norse pagan gods and/or Hellenic gods), the fact you said "elder gods" leads me to believe you like Lovecraft. Crap. Those gods are nuts.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 05:54 AM
0	An Examination of Male Privilege Young men are a greater insurance risk because they represent a morale hazard, it's the concept that their driving habits are more likely to produce an accident that will therefore result in a claim. Then they get into the actual accident and it proves the point. Death aside, that is where the notion of higher rates comes from. I do thank you for the statistics about fatality rates. I forgot about that!	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 02:08 AM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege ... In October. That's when open enrollment is, assuming the act is activated on time. I know this because I'm a health insurance broker. I'm right in the middle of what's going on. But you're right. Just noting the timeline for the law.	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 11:22 PM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege For Pt 3: Aye - hence why i kept referencing the insanity of the "don't be that guy" campaign. For Pt 2: Also yes, i misunderstood the paternity aspect. That case you posted is fracked up. Covering lots of ground to fact check. I freely admit I'm a bit of a devil's advocate with this. But that's cause I've seen some people actually argue this in a non-satirical sense. Makes me force a discussion. Plus it helps test me. Thanks for the correct citation!	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 10:51 PM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege Good point on mutilation. But would you call circumcision mutilation? Or are you referring to castration? edit: I'd like to note that the castration element being the more relevant issue to north america... oh chemical castration how you terrify me.	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 10:12 PM
1	An Examination of Male Privilege Oh I definitely helped prove many of his points - sure lots were humorous and such... But some points must have context and there are differences between the genders. How's any of that androphobic? It's statistical and factual - for example, I agree that the army's standards that physical performance should be equally high for men and women (especially for the special forces); lowering the bar for the sake of gender differences can degrade the efficiency of the machine considering if a person, g…	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 10:09 PM
0	An Examination of Male Privilege I get ya. It's just a force of habit to wonder how much is poking fun at the concept. Namely cause oversimplifying the issue would be just as silly as a feminist arguing how she, as an affluent girl living in, say, California, makes crap cause she got a BA in Women's Studies and now works at McDonalds while citing bad data haha.	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 10:00 PM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege Technically this is done on a socio-demographic level for specific communities. Insurors look at trends in the specific cities (for health - zip codes) and gauge risk by area, adjusting premiums to an extent to be more appealing to residents in low risk areas; in high risk areas, the rates are raised to compensate for the increased risk transferred to the company (yes it is more "profitable" so long as the client doesn't file a claim - hence the risk transfer). So, an all black-jew community wou…	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 06:27 PM
2	An Examination of Male Privilege On the contrary, this proves my point. Women tend to use more health insurance, so the companies tend to make women pay a higher premium than male counterparts. That's how the companies check risk. That's not sexism or "privilege" - that's risk management: insurance companies use cold, hard statistics to gauge risk management. The OP's point is men are fucked for the sake of being men.	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 06:21 PM
6	An Examination of Male Privilege OK... context is key, so before you all sacrifice me to the heathen gods of old, understand that rational breakdowns really must be looked at if we want to be taken seriously. And know that I fully support the Equal Rights Movement (aka: Men's Rights). For the TL;DR crowd... read the first and last paragraphs. Note: I realize the OP was using satire to poke fun at the extent of "male privilege", I'm just making it into an actual discussion lest we turn into the same hate misandrists hold in thei…	/r/MensRights	31/07/13 05:38 PM
1	I had to take a sexual assault web course, there were no male victim senarios I'm not disagreeing with its use - I thought it was hilarious and the movie is hysterical... but that was the one entertaining part of an otherwise misandrist seminar.	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 06:56 AM
36	I had to take a sexual assault web course, there were no male victim senarios Sadly logic isn't applied to this issue.	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 01:16 AM
17	I had to take a sexual assault web course, there were no male victim senarios It is contrived, and plastic, and fake, and presumptuous... as Hyaloid said below, it's AlcoholEDU - I had to do that at school for my fraternity and then some. As a pledge at the U of Arizona, I had to go to a "spring break protection" seminar. The entire thing was equivalent to "Don't Be That Guy" propaganda: all guys are rapists; women are innocent beings that can't make decisions when drunk; all guys are rapists; Stop your male friends from raping women; Rape; rape; rape; aaaaannnd SING (Mis…	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 01:08 AM
4	The Ultimate White Knight (x-post from r/cringepics) Why do I get the feeling that this kid read Twilight...	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 01:01 AM
18	101 Ways for Men to be Allies to Women, including: "Walk on the other side of the street when a woman is walking towards you at night." Sigh. 22 - Take a women's study class. False: I'd rather chop my own dick off, thank you. I can't take those classes seriously when the women who participate go out of their way to yell at me for doing polite things: holding the door open; saying hello as I pass by; offering to buy one a drink at the bar. Note: I didn't know they were 'feminists' on any of these occasions until the yelling and degrading started. Edit: I just read MRB's hilarious list - and I agree: it's like taking Nazism from a Nazi.	/r/MensRights	27/07/13 10:35 PM
1	Feminists criticizing prince, because it is a boy... On the flip side, we can call the little man The Fresh Prince. Congrats to Will and Kate - just ignore the crazies... who cares if it's a boy or girl? Either way it's third in line and a royal.	/r/MensRights	27/07/13 06:41 PM
5	Apparently bitching about other people's work is more important than the actual work. (x-post gaming) Shiny.	/r/MensRights	26/07/13 04:45 PM
1	"Why The 'End' of White Men Is Actually Good For White Men" by Jezebel. Makes me sick. Touche' about Hel. And you're right, but I have to note there's more grey than your initial point suggested. You just can't simply state "X is better 'cause Y bad."	/r/MensRights	25/07/13 09:21 AM
6	"Why The 'End' of White Men Is Actually Good For White Men" by Jezebel. Makes me sick. Point #4 has more leaks in that argument than the NSA. Catholics in America would argue they had to work their asses off. So would a vast majority of Eastern Europeans. Hell, Catholics in Ireland have plenty of stories of oppression at the hands of the English. Protestants in Germany and northern Europe would also like to note they had to fight their asses off to gain recognition in post-reformation Europe. That's not "privilege" - that's something they had to earn. Notice I didn't even have to …	/r/MensRights	25/07/13 09:04 AM
1	"Why The 'End' of White Men Is Actually Good For White Men" by Jezebel. Makes me sick. Assuming she doesn't help her father in Ragnarok... Also the Norse society was male dominated - there wouldn't be much of a difference between the roles of men and women in a binary "good or bad" context in any of these societies; How women would be treated involves a lot more grey. Norse society showed reverence to their female deities (Freyja especially) - the valkyrie is also a great example of romanticism showing respect for the warrior women who carried men to Valhalla (Hel was also the god…	/r/MensRights	25/07/13 08:32 AM
1	"The worst misandry does is hurt men's feelings..." Apparently I need to state the obvious that I was referring to what the movement now is today... This is further proof more and more low-level supporters of the Feminist Movement are actually supremacists [today, rather than back in the 19th and early 20th centuries] The bracketed portion I edited in just now is to further that point. Being technical and argumentative doesn't change the fact that the so-called 'feminist' movements are at large not the same as the suffrage movement, yet they use …	/r/MensRights	25/07/13 06:52 AM
1	"The worst misandry does is hurt men's feelings..." To point out that the "feminist" movement is no longer the feminist movement. more and more low-level supporters of the Feminist Movement are actually supremacists.	/r/MensRights	25/07/13 12:04 AM
2	"The worst misandry does is hurt men's feelings..." Oh yes you can win the argument: cite actual statistics and examples of feminist supremacism in modern nations; ask the feminists to give you an example of a law men have been trying to pass that puts women at a disadvantage in recent history. edit: They might switch to the anti-abortion topic; the abortion argument is an emotionally bullshit argument - counter it with the fact that the majority of women who become pregnant chose to have sex with a man, so calling anti-abortion laws oppressive i…	/r/MensRights	24/07/13 06:16 PM
6	"The worst misandry does is hurt men's feelings..." Marxism: The theory that the expropriated will become the expropriator. There is no equality in Marxism, there is only revenge. Anyways, that circular logic crap these feminists supremacists employ is just disgusting. This is further proof more and more low-level supporters of the Feminist Movement are actually supremacists [today, rather than back in the 19th and early 20th centuries]. They act like this is still a time where women were actually at a massive social and economic disadvantage to …	/r/MensRights	24/07/13 06:11 PM
6	Anti-porn Tory MP's website flooded with porn I'm a little surprised that wasn't the focus of the prank.	/r/MensRights	24/07/13 01:47 AM
10	I never understood why r/mensrights has so many posts of isolated incidents of sexism against men. Now it's hit close to home. I get it. Here's mine. Haha I don't blame you for being frustrated to all hell yoink. It's a legal pain in the ass to prove innocence these days...	/r/MensRights	19/07/13 03:30 AM
106	I never understood why r/mensrights has so many posts of isolated incidents of sexism against men. Now it's hit close to home. I get it. Here's mine. Aye - take hard evidence to the police. Claiming she's attempting to torpedo his life is one thing, but proving it is much more helpful: Take the same route Brian Banks did and get recorded evidence (while his life was largely changed by the rape charge... he's now exonerated and playing with the ATL Falcons). Unfortunately these types of atrocities are not unheard of... men are having their rights to due process arbitrarily stripped, especially in the court of public opinion. While that doesn't…	/r/MensRights	19/07/13 12:55 AM
1	Sexual Assault Voices of Edmonton: Don’t be THAT stupid-AVFM threatened with legal action copyright violation over poster image usage Agreed. The whole legal battle is probably designed to scare AVFM and get them to withdraw based on legal fees sustained in court. Wasting time and money is a tactic in itself.	/r/MensRights	16/07/13 05:08 AM
5	Sexual Assault Voices of Edmonton: Don’t be THAT stupid-AVFM threatened with legal action copyright violation over poster image usage First, the AVFM site and MRM specifically outlines a reasonable argument, yet there are feminists supremacists who libel it and seek to defame it, claiming we're rape apologists, misogynists, or other ludicrous notions. Second, you're right that we shouldn't call them feminazis or nazis or use name-calling in general, and we don't in our mainstay arguments (reddit is another issue and we should hold ourselves to higher standards). Again - it still happens, but emotions run wild in both genders a…	/r/MensRights	14/07/13 09:20 PM
8	Sexual Assault Voices of Edmonton: Don’t be THAT stupid-AVFM threatened with legal action copyright violation over poster image usage Aye, we're soemtimes emotional; Emotions are bound to happen - it's called being human. The difference is we're voicing the opinions that need to be made to stop a [former]1 humanist movement (the feminist movement) from turning into a full blown supremacist movement. And a lot of us go out of our way to cite proper studies and legal cases that further why we must speak up. We're not here to [just] bitch and moan, but to help arm all of those who come here to find a true humanist approach to law…	/r/MensRights	14/07/13 08:39 PM
10	Sexual Assault Voices of Edmonton: Don’t be THAT stupid-AVFM threatened with legal action copyright violation over poster image usage Yes - from Fair Use in Wiki (read up to get the idea and use it as a springboard): > Producers or creators of parodies of a copyrighted work have been sued for infringement by the targets of their ridicule, even though such use may be protected as fair use. These fair use cases distinguish between parodies (using a work in order to poke fun at or comment on the work itself) and satires (using a work to poke fun at or comment on something else). > In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc the Supreme C…	/r/MensRights	14/07/13 08:19 PM
3	Ossining High Teacher Charged With Raping Student. Why, when female teachers do exactly what he did, are they described as "Having a relationship" with the male victim? Plus the media is largely on board with this notion and very few major news sources ever deviate from the party line: "only men can rape women" and "a woman's sanctity must be protected" because apparently women can't make choices for themselves & allegedly [all] men are "that guy" (/cough Edmonton /cough)... Suzanne Venker is one of the few journalists, let alone women, I've ever seen go on a major news network that was able to write something criticizing the turn feminism has taken, especially…	/r/MensRights	13/07/13 10:10 PM
1	This is the United States Supreme Court decision that allows rape statutes to specifically discriminate against men. They could try, yes, however the dissenting opinion still exists, and that could be used as a precedent to make more laws gender neutral or even prevent a law from passage. It's a part of why we have dissenting opinions in our system; We need to know what both sides think - for or against, right or wrong, good or bad. In Michael M. v Superior Court back in '80-'81, the plurality considered that there wasn't enough evidence to prove the law's gender specific contexts violated the 14th Amendment's…	/r/MensRights	06/07/13 08:34 AM
2	This is the United States Supreme Court decision that allows rape statutes to specifically discriminate against men. Edit: The wording of the CA Penal Code for the Age of Consent was changed 12 years later. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/39t3c2s9#page-3 That is a peer reviewed article from UCLA Women's Law Journal in 1994. It was my top hit on my Google search for a "California gender-neutral statutory rape law." I searched it because I noticed the original post was dated back to 1980 for Michael M. v. Superior Court (No. 79-1344) - the case was decided in '81 - and I wanted to find if the law had been up…	/r/MensRights	06/07/13 12:49 AM