TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kamov_isaov Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by kamov_isaov on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-10

As I said, the man gains rights, and responsabilities, AFTER a live child is delivered. Before that its the womans body and her medical choices only. If a man and a woman produce a child they both need to be responsable for paying for it. Under current laws they are. What you are demanding is a say BEFORE a child is born, but AFTER a man gets a woman pregnant! This would only be possible by either controlling abortion, ie abortion or bno abortion on the whim of the man, or else that the taxpayer…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:08 AM
-13

Yes women are being responsable for opening their legs by exercising their options both before and after. One of the options the exercise is abortion. Mens rights activists on the otherhand seem to be complaining that theyb get women pregnantt and then are forced to pay child support and be responsable and are demanding a say over womens bodies to force abortions or to prevent abortions according to their whim to give them males priviledges at the expense of womens bodily rights. ie MRAs are NOT…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:57 AM
-15

There is no baby until its born only the woman and her body and her choice to get an abortion or not free of duress. If she chooses an abortion she is not taking away the mans baby because he never had any baby to begin with and no rights nor responsabilities concerning such until the live delivery of a baby. If you want men to have a say over whether women get an abortion then yes indeed you do want men to have control over womens bodies because abortion is concerning a womens control over her …
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:37 AM
-20

Various quotes I think are relevant here. The facts are that women are more valuable than men in a biological sense. 'Women are both necessary and sufficient for reproduction, and men are neither. From the production of the first cell (egg) to the development of the fetus and the birth and breast-feeding of the child, fathers can be absent. Think about your own history. Your life as an egg actually started in your mother’s developing ovary, before she was born; you were wrapped in your mother’s …
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:24 AM
-9

Im a man. By definition I cannot be bigoted against myself. Perhaps I am bigeted against betas. Thats because I find them to be passive aggressive asshats with an entitlement mentality. Lets put it this way. Everything the mens rights activists find to complain about women and how women act, entitled, whingy, unfair, I find the beta males to be tens times worse in all those very things. Maybe its jealousy? Maybe the beta male wants to be treated just like a real princess too and when we dont ind…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:07 AM
-27

1. Even the police may not take your biological materials without consent or court order or you have been arrested and charged with a crime. Even a single specimen taken against your will is a basic violation of rights. the comment claimed that french men are banned from taking paternity tests and linked to an article. The article was heavily biased but even it admitted that paternity tests were allowed if the donors of the specimens consented OR if they did not consent if the courts ordered the…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:53 AM
-22

if women had children insttantly then the anti abortion people argument would make sense. Their argument does make sense for men because for them if they have sex and cause a woman to become pregnant then the result is indeed out of their hands AS ITS NO LONGER THEIR BODY. Essentially, for a man, pregnancy is instant, thus the argument, you dont want a child dont have unprotected sex is indeed valid when refering to men. The fact that men are generally physically stronger then women doesnt take …
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:42 AM
-24

men cannot opt out of a pregnancy post conception thats biology not evil wimmins oppressing your poor poor mens. You dont want to be fathers dont have sex. Use contraception. You have no right to expect women to use medical devices so you dont have to just to enhance your pleasure, you want to be sure of not having children then abstain (believe me pleny of us alpha males will take your place) or simply use contraception on yourself. For a male preganancy is instant. For a woman, by dearth of he…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:30 AM
-42

another quote from your link 'Islam knew the female psyche well and has had restrictions in place to prevent them from going wild and destroying society.' The reason why MRAs are derided and laughed at at best and called dangerous idiots? Because we know your real motivations, that you all just want to rule women, and are upset the law doesnt allow you that anymore.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:18 AM
-41

Even the source you linked to eventually admits its perfectly legal to seek paternity but that you cant just do it with peoples dna without their permission. To extract DNA in vitro is a medical procedure on the womans body, requires consent from the woman. To extract DNA from a childs body also obviously requires pconsent from the child/childs legal guardian. The law is not to stop fathers who are paying child support from getting tests done but rather to prevent harvesting of medical specimens…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:07 AM
-43

Men do have the exact same rights as women have concerning abortions. If a man is preganant then he has the same right to get an abortion or keep the child a woman has. The fact that men dont get pregnant is not oppression but biology. What I suspect you refer to, as the whole mens rights movement refers to in disguise, is the right to a say over the womans body when she is pregnant and has to choose an abortion or not for herself. Of course men dont get a say over womens bodies anymore than any…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:53 AM
-12

The vast majority of people in power something like greater than 90 percent in the western world are men, in fact they are white wealthy straight and abled men. Thus if the white wealthy straight abled man is being oppressed, who is doing the oppression? The facts are that they arent being oppressed at all. Any man who complains and whinges and thinks he is oppressed when he is white wealthy straight and abled in the western world, a time of unparralelled freedom for everyone, is merely feeling …
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter