TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kannolli Archive

View 1 post and 19 comments by kannolli on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-8

Good for someone to check in on kids on here. Lots of toxic stuff for kids bc they don’t get nuance.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 09:37 PM
-2

Yeah she never said it was sexist… that’s my point and how OP missed the point. Yes, she was complaining about how men don’t have to choose because the choice for her is a burden. In the same vein, everyone, men and women, have to face that choice if they want children before they are too old or die. Men don’t have to sacrifice career goals. It’s tone deaf, but not sexist.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:01 PM
-8

OP missed the entire point of the article. Men don’t have to physically carry a child, so they can keep playing their sport… She never says that she doesn’t get paid to take care of a child…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 06:18 PM
-4

Not common - I know how to turn my wife on
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:37 AM
-5

This whole post is a straw man.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:01 PM
-7

Your thesis statement says otherwise. If education is toxic how am I effected? Or others? The article posted doesn’t even remotely talk about your opinion. It’s about what some random kids feel with a primer on rates. What articles? What dots? You say nothing but general statements. Maybe it is harder to find w/e author thinks is a “good man?” Some people have dumb opinions.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:46 AM
-21

Education isn’t toxic. I’m an educated man and have a wife no problem, we’ll below the average age too. Maybe just you’re toxic?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:09 PM
1

No if the friendship is genuinely held by both people… Yes if the guy would not be friends with her if he was not attracted to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 03:01 PM
1

Depends on the person - this is a nonsensical debate bc you can’t ignore the nuances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 03:00 PM
1

I think what they mean is: Women are more selective and therefor less likely to get into any relationship. Guys are less selective and therefor have a higher incidences of possible relationships. Of course this is likely a sliding scale based on how attractive you are and can only be applied to “like” levels of attractiveness. Also, it’s a major generalization to say “men this or women that” so whatever follows is basically automatically wrong. Also, can you link some places where you see the or…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:57 PM
1

Your questions require more specifics. It seems like you have the money to consult an Attorney. Please don’t rely on any of these comments.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 03:52 PM
1

And? What’s your point. Everyone has different preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 09:18 AM
3

Biologically yes - mentally everyone matures differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 09:16 PM
0

Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:13 PM
1

Straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:13 PM
2

Do they want that? or do they just think they want that because that’s what they’re told? There are a lot of sexless marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:59 PM
2

What does marriage rate have to do with sex? OP was talking about celibacy not long term relationships. I do agree with the sentiment that women have more options and therefore can aim a little higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 12:53 PM
1

+5 int. I agree. I'm sure they were training astronauts before they sent them into space in 1962 + there was a lot of media coverage of that training and lead up to the mission. Completly plausible she wrote a letter as a 11-12 yearold girl
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 01:38 PM
-67

The last bit made me upvote
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/19 12:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter