karajima Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Why are redpillers so unexpectedly lacking in skepticism about stories about women, field reports, etc? The purpose of field reports is to give an idea of what one can do in the field. Way back in seddit, they detailed various shit tests dealt with, attitudes one can have and general actions to take. In reading those, one can gain an idea of how to act in a similar situation. This builds confidence. What does it matter if reporter A didn't really bang two girls in a club bathroom? The words said and actions taken matter more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/14 06:23 AM
-1	Is this line of thought incorrect? Saw on a fitness forum - women as "non-human safes" containing sex We're not merely talking about brush offs, but sources where women have explicitly stated what they want. I.e. blogs, magazines, forums, conversations, etc.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/01/14 06:31 AM
2	Is this line of thought incorrect? Saw on a fitness forum - women as "non-human safes" containing sex You can say that in response to certain actions Is that not all we need when trying to find out what women will respond to? Why would a woman, who has better emotional aptitude, be worse at determining her own emotional response to actions than a man, externally observing her actions? Because someone observing external behavior can approach it objectively, while someone describing their personal internal behavior can only be subjective. It seems like you're attempting to separate empathy from ot…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/01/14 05:27 AM
3	Is this line of thought incorrect? Saw on a fitness forum - women as "non-human safes" containing sex Let's start from the bottom: why does it follow that men are able understand women's processes better than women? Observation rather than self-reporting. Which is stronger evidence of an aspect being attractive: A) a visual observation of a person demonstrating the aspect in question being successful/unsuccessful or B) a person reporting that they find the aspect desirable? To me, a higher degree of emotional aptitude would tend to show a higher ability to understand what you're attracted to, ra…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/01/14 04:44 AM
3	Is this line of thought incorrect? Saw on a fitness forum - women as "non-human safes" containing sex Ah, you've misunderstood the point of my response. It wasn't to disprove or resolve that particular paradox, but to elaborate on its reasons and causes. In short: I never understood why it is that women can't mentally process what attracts them - if women are more emotionally adept (as you asserted previously), then they would have a better understanding of what their emotional response to certain actions is, yes? If women are more emotionally adept, then they have a better understanding of thei…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/01/14 04:19 AM
5	Is this line of thought incorrect? Saw on a fitness forum - women as "non-human safes" containing sex I never understood why it is that women can't mentally process what attracts them - if women are more emotionally adept (as you asserted previously), then they would have a better understanding of what their emotional response to certain actions is, yes? If not, it seems a bit paradoxical. Furthermore, it's really a bit silly to argue that nature (which I really don't think is "nature" to begin with) wins out over every other bit of social conditioning, medication (studies are now indicating dif…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/01/14 02:53 AM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter