TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

karatdem Archive

View 0 posts and 276 comments by karatdem on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Most people though it was made by a con artist to get attention and clicks, not by a feminist. Now there are some indications but nothing solid that someone up the Russian media ladder could be involved.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:04 PM
4

And in most of the threads people were saying it looked fake. We are not crazy feminists that fall for every stupid fake information.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:56 AM
9

Leans right is accurate. It does not mean it is a right wing movement. It is not. But the people in it lean right. That is not inaccurate. Also, the mainstream left is utterly hostile to the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:40 AM
16

Most women are not feminists. It is easy to forget. Her opinion is probably popular among women.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:36 PM
8

Most of his friends corroborated what he said about drinking. A couple of room mates contradicted him. That is not "fair chunk of evidence" that he lied about his drinking habits. That is very flimsy and would not take you anywhere in court.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:27 AM
9

You clearly don't understand #MeToo. They want the power to blindly take on any adversary. Feminists have been arguing you should believe women always for a long time. Weinstein and the hashtag was just a way to create moral panic and shut down logical discussion so this idea could be put forward.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:25 AM
6

They are learning from "Get woke, go broke". But they will continue to feminize James Bond like they have been doing for several movies. Notice how James Bond is not a guy that goes from woman to woman without any intention to comit, very aloof, like the early Bond. Now, he is a guy that gets emotional with one woman and he is even willing to drop his job and stop servicing his country to be with one particular woman. If they had included this plot in early Bonds people would have rebuffed as un…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:11 PM
2

This literally makes sense if you think in terms of class and feminist revisionist history, because then you are just "punching up", so its all right.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 09:00 AM
5

Another privileged rich white woman becoming a feminist? How original...
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:06 AM
1

I would not go back. You'll feel like an outcast always.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:57 AM
3

And I missed it when FBI said that; it would surprise me, because we are talking about updating the background investigation done before the hearing, right? There was nothing new said during the hearings. The democrats are resorting to say whether the judge drunk more or less while he was at college, as if that changes anything. And that he is an angry white men that cries. That is how you know there was nothing new of substance said. There is no reason for the FBI to open a new investigation. W…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 11:32 AM
3

The democrats have already rejected this new investigation because it is limited in time. Dr Ford has also rejected this investigation. And do not forget that the investigation is only happening because Trump has ordered it, the FBI had already said they have not enough evidence to start a new investigation. It is all a show. Nothing will ever be enough because it is all just a stalling strategy. There is nothing else behind it. And let us leave Feinstein off the hook here: she sat on the info p…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:12 AM
10

But what I also do not get is why the resistance to an extended FBI background check (not a criminal investigation). If Ford is bluffing and not a shred of corroboration comes through, then Kavanaugh will emerge stronger and with a relatively clean record - the least he will need to rule with authority on such an important decision. The reason is everybody knows there is nothing, but the democrats want to stall until after the midterm election when they have a good chance of recovering one of th…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:14 AM
3

There is no inconsistency. This sub regularly sides against feminists trying to shame and censor hot woman. Just because feminists are miserable people that want to censor hot women, we should not do the same for men just so it is equal. We should go against the censoring of hot women for equality.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:33 AM
4

There is no exploitation of bodies. Just hot people showing theirs. All the cries of exploitation is just feminists being dramatic to shame men and hot women, so they get to censor the competition. Its Victorian feminism. Absolute nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:17 AM
11

Do not attack The Narrative, or else...
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:12 AM
11

If you can stop a man from getting a job by throwing to him 30 yo unsubstantiated accusations, all men are fucked. If the dems succeed, it is a disaster for all western men. I don't understand why they though it was a good idea to try this stupid strategy.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:20 PM
4

Do you understand irony?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:56 PM
20

Whatever delays his nomination they are going to use. They've lost any kind of decency or limit they had.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:09 PM
28

I've been discussing exactly this with some people. I disagree with the guy on almost anything politically, but that's irrelevant. The attack on men should take priority because if it succeeds it will change our culture for the worse, much much worse. If any guy can be taken down by completely unsubstantiated accusations this is going to be a slaughter. I am absolutely disgusted by what the democrats are doing. There is no excuse.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:16 PM
6

She should have said Democrats instead of liberals. Apart from that she is not wrong.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:11 PM
4

Its a hoax.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:32 PM
12

True. If it were someone else I would remark it is just an accusation. But this guy has been promoting the idea of "always believe woman". He has thrown any other man under the bus with zero remorse. It is only fair that we apply his own standard to him, don't you think?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:13 AM
2

Politics apart, let this internet stranger advice you that you should not rely on impression to believe or disbelieve someone. People are able to lie very convincingly, much more than you'll ever imagine. Anyway, take care.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:34 AM
1

It is not PUA. In fact, Red Pill extremely dislikes PUA. While PUA is about "tricks" to appear high value to women so you can fuck them, TRP is about actually becoming high value so women are naturally attracted. PUA is more influenced by psychology that can increase confidence quick, that can have immediate results. Instead, TRP relies heavily in evolutionary psychology to understand the difference between men and women, to understand what is a high value man. For TRP, PUA is an empty life path…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:26 AM
55

The group linked belongs to Kimmel, a male feminist that has been accused of assaulting women. So reddit is recommending going to a group by a women abuser.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:12 AM
3

Do you really think you can know the truth just by how a person speaks? Why do you think the people she said were there, including her best friend, denied it?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:17 PM
2

Why do you think Kavanaugh harassed that woman?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:29 PM
3

Well then, I know you are young and deep down want to believe the world is a better place than it is and kind of hurts your head to imagine how miserable people can be (at least that's how I was at 15, maybe you are ahead of me). #Metoo is a power play. They are using the actions of a scumbag (actions that are probably not even illegal, just socially disgusting) to trigger the biological response of men caring for their women, to weaken judicial and social protections for the accusers in sexual …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:44 AM
2

Have you seen the pictures and stories about her youth. She is a fucking train wreck of a woman. Not surprised she ended up as an educator. In modern society I doubt she could fit anywhere else.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:42 AM
1

If the Dems wanted an investigation they wouldn't have sit in the info for weeks without doing nothing. Everybody knows they give two shits about it, everybody knows it is useless and the only reason to ask for it (repeatedly) is to postpone the voting for political reasons. You know it too and that is exactly why you are asking for it.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:37 AM
0

Exactly, he said it himself. He hired only women as clerks. It is ridiculous how this men bow to women... until it hits them.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:32 AM
5

I agree with the whole movement, but fuck the people at the top, hypocrites. I don't think you really understood what #metoo was about.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:21 AM
20

Dr Ford is discussing a very painful memory You don't know that.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:17 AM
37

The parents are furious because their male identifying child can not remain in a girls only organization? What were they expecting? The solution is easy though, the child has to identify as gender fluid.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:47 PM
3

Yes they are. It is obvious it is all a smear campaign. Yet, we don't need to defend a man we don't know. We need to defend due process and that will defend him as well.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:19 AM
23

So Democrat strategy now is to find crazy women and convince them to accuse the rep nominee. And they expect to win votes like this?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:09 AM
1

Parents, not patents. I mistyped, have corrected it now.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:44 PM
7

No, the focus should on the fact that the accusations are ridiculous. For what we know he did not do any of that. That a crazy woman with a grudge because his mother ruled against her parents can stop the whole american system is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:38 AM
1

Millenials are tough to comply and they mostly do. It is very sad.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 03:57 AM
18

Women know men sexual thirst is their biggest power. If low level men can find a way to discharge their thirst without needing women, they lose big part of the power. Imagine a bunch of girls trying to play damsel in distress to a bunch of sexually satisfied dudes that can not give a shit if these women fuck them or not. It would even change modern politics. That's why women oppose it so much.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:33 PM
2

The thing is, they often are. Not all but a lot of them. A majority. It is how they are raised. If Asian men want to change that perception the best thing they can do is stop being that way and not give a fuck about how the media portrays them. I promise you women will react to the strong manly presence of an Asian man paying no influence to what the media says.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:51 PM
3

Women are not stupid. They just pretend to be when it is convenient to them. The women in your life feel like it is their duty to side with the sisterhood (in group bias), hence they pretend to be stupid to try to win the argument. They are not. Remember, the biggest strength of women is their facade of weakness.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:19 PM
5

Real liberals, known in the USA as classical liberals, not USA liberals aka progressives.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:14 PM
5

Can you say pandering louder?
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:31 PM
1

This is a great idea.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:31 PM
14

Because Democrats are using it to delay the nomination. This case would not even be in the news if it wasn't useful for the Democrats.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:29 PM
56

Usually, but not in this case, and she still got a pass for the perjury.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:23 PM
3

Let me be blunt: Women make around 70-80% of the spending. Women tend more towards consensus while men tend to be more independent, which means women are more influenced by mass media propaganda, because it makes them believe it is the consensus. Pink "tax" is the perfect example of this phenomenon. Put those two together and you can see how targeting women equals more sales. Advertisers want to target women, so content creators try to give them women. They can not explicitly say it this way, so…
/r/MensRights23/09/18 05:32 AM
41

The only correct thing a man can do is not give a shit about feminists whining.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 12:34 PM
3

Exactly. Showing sexual attraction is completely normal. Feminists just want to control masculine sexuality.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:54 PM
-1

Lol, you did not cited anything and the comment history is there to show it.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:47 PM
5

But if you are going to believe such a speculative story, why not believe that it is all a political story? Both are as believable, why one over the other?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:09 PM
28

Accusing a man of a crime 35 years old never reported before and just before he is going to be voted for the supreme court wasn't fishy enough?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:48 PM
3

Yes, it is. We can keep going like this forever, because I suspect you have no actual historic knowledge of that period and won't engage in actual discussion.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:16 AM
2

This is a historically false myth.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:56 AM
2

There is no mention of the guy on the therapist version. She might as well be a person that makes up rape stories, hence the inconsistencies. It is absolutely ridiculous that you are pretending that two completely different stories give her more credibility, and not less, because trauma.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:54 AM
2

It speaks to his character that so many women are willing to stand up for him. When Bill Cosby was accused, one common argument was that so many women could not be lying at the same time. So what does it says when so many women vouch for his character?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:21 AM
3

It appears that she did in fact mention it to her therapist years prior to his nomination. I don't know if Matt Walsh was unaware of this, or is intentionally misleading readers. It is however factually inaccurate and has not been corrected. What she reported to the therapist varies wildly from the report she's made this time, for example in the number of assaulters.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:11 AM
11

They are ugly and want to starve the market to have a chance. It is that simple.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:33 PM
3

Condoms barely do anything against HPV. This is the one that if you want to avoid you have to avoid sex.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:20 AM
5

It is not down voted because it goes against the narrative. It is down voted because it is highly unbelievable. It is like the STEM version of the Rolling Stones rape hoax. It ticks all the feminists tropes, but once you start to analyze it, it is almost impossible for what she explains to happen. It is like the fantasy of a person after hearing the bullshit about what should be happening at STEM colleges, same as the rape hoax was just a fantasy.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:52 AM
9

I doubt this is the all to be honest. I've been around engineering classes and labs and have never seen something that even comes close to what you explain. You sound more like feminists fantasy than reality. Basically, I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:12 PM
15

That is a non answer if I've ever read one. I'll put it clearly so you can not pretend to not understand what I'm saying: if your lawyer tells you you have no chance at getting custody and you'll only be trowing away your time and money, you won't ask for custody. That does not mean you don't want it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 12:53 PM
16

Not asking for custody does not mean the man does not want it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:52 AM
154

Osaka also deserves an apology from Serena, but I doubt any of the two will get it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:49 AM
4

It is a sign of intelligence.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:43 PM
4

women radical feminists But you are right it is important to differentiate between women and feminists.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:41 PM
25

Secondary target only?!? Guys, we need to do better.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:34 AM
2

As is the racist NYT.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:43 AM
8

I didn't know that two feminists were besides me. They heard it & damm came to harrash me for saying it. They said they were offended and i should say sorry for it. Probably a 3-4 min speech. I clearly didn't give a fuck to them. At the end, i said Go to your table and eat your shit there. I didn't know if they heard the other jokes or not but i guess from their argument they didn't listen. If this is what happened, you did good. They were on a power trip and you didn't gave them an inch to grab…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:42 AM
9

You've met the racist feminists? I though they were all dead by now.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:39 AM
23

And also feminist indoctrination makes teacher see girls as victims.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:37 AM
1

No, Spain has a strong family first culture. Family, even cousins and other not immediate relatives, has a great importance. You are looked down if you don't show respect.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 06:05 AM
2

Criticizing feminism is not criticizing women.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:39 AM
23

An honest woman is refreshing.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:38 AM
11

Don't fall for the troll, down vote and move on.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:23 PM
4

And racist.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:07 PM
3

But then how can feminist blame and criminalize men?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:06 PM
17

But ASA changed its rules so an advert like the yellow one could not happen again. So yes, it was banned, even if it was able to run its contract before the ban came into effect.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:58 PM
5

but google itself isn't trying to force an agenda necissarily But they are and have been caught red handed several times.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:59 AM
3

Tbf she acknowledges the damage she could have made to him first of all. It is only at the end that she also points out that it also hurts other women.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:08 AM
3

Now think why you did.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:55 AM
13

Anymore? When did we as society care for men?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:50 AM
17

Not mad, just a normal non pussified dude.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:48 AM
6

Not true. Google's algorithms are not neutral. They are managed by people who influence the type of outcome the algorithm produces.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:10 AM
20

The NYT is a racist organization. They have no say in the race debate.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:48 AM
2

Is the job worth it? I would try to look for another job. If the job (aka paycheck) is really worth it, I think your only option is to talk with the CEO. Explain to him that you understand the danger of the whole team imploding, but that you know how to handle it and have a track record to prove it. Insist some. Maybe you have tried this already, but without your superiors support any advice is useless because you will be overruled again. One thing you should do, if you are not doing already, is…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:52 PM
8

aka The Feminist Lie
/r/MensRights01/09/18 07:43 AM
2

I assure you the macho attitude of the job is one of the few perks that is keeping these men sane. Feminists do not understand how men behave and why.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:59 PM
1

Define #TrueEquality?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:57 PM
1

There are men feminists and women MRA. Trust the person, not the sex. Even if women and men are statistically different, it is unwise to assume the average is true for every individual.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:53 PM
15

Good. SJW don't want to lose their indoctrination camps, that is why they are criticizing her so heavily.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 03:29 AM
6

Not really. It seems all the girls exchanged sex for favours, some of them even did it long term.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:44 PM
0

What Harvey Weinstein did was also immoral but (most likely) not illegal.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:07 AM
2

Yes, and in many others, women are superior to men. Which makes sense because from an evolutionary POV it makes sense to have a dimorphic species to specialize each type of individual in different tasks.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:15 AM
3

When two guys get into a fight, they start screaming at each other, beat the shit out of one another, but the next day, they're playing basketball together like nothing happened. Didn't understand it then; still don't. Violence is the ultimate decider, the last recourse. Once there has been a fight, the hierarchy between those two has been established. We know who won and who lost. It is settled. Don't get confused. The one who lost the fight is hurt in his ego, his social standing has diminishe…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:12 AM
23

Feminism has always been like this. These present day feminists that you say have highjacked feminism are just the ideological heirs of 60's feminists, the ones who embraced postmodernism. I am afraid it is you who don't understand what feminism is, because you have been sold the sterilized fake version of feminism that you learnt at school. That feminism never existed, it is a lie.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:54 AM
1

If you look at brain scans of men and women when they are thinking, the patterns we display are very different. Men is much more straight, and women is much more disperse. Men like to solve logical puzzles where every step is solidly logically inferred from previous facts. This type of thinking obviously excels at certain areas, f.e. science, but it is very inefficient and slow for certain others. A more disperse way of thinking, one predicated on possibilities of outcomes, is much better suited…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:20 AM
1

Those are masculine values. Females excel at other areas. For example, females are better at non linear thinking or "fuzzy logic", the type of thinking that it is better than pure logic for example in social situations. There are lots of areas where women surpass men.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:49 AM
2

Men are stronger. And also more trustworthy, in the sense that men value honor more than women and have an affinity for rules that females do not share. That does not make us men better though.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:35 AM
4

Traditional masculinity was never predicated on being superior to women. That's a feminist myth.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:48 AM
3

Its not that they need to be reinforced, but that the individual benefits from having them reinforced because it helps to develop them further. Culture is important in humans because it allows us to learn quickly from what others took a lot of time to develop.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:21 AM
2

It is good that they are gendered, because that way they can reinforce the natural habilities of each gender. Its the same as with age, you won't treat a 6yo the same way as a 10yo.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:05 AM
99

There is some truth to it. Humans are social animals and need to feel a sense of belonging to a tribe. Clear roles and rituals help give that sense, to both men and women. It would be very nice if we were able to be abstract beings completely malleable, but we are not. We have certain impulses and instincts acquired through evolution, and belonging to a tribe with clear patterns seems to be one of them.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:34 PM
2

Is he not a major stake holder?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:05 PM
4

You are assuming there is no political intent behind his donations.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:04 PM
9

You said: I think it is quite reasonable that if you are living together for a significant amount of time you are partners with all of the rights and responsibilities and protections that come with it. You did not say that is just how they do it there, you say it was also reasonable. Don't lie. My question remains the same. These couples can marry if they want to. Yet they chose not to. They chose not to have those advantages and obligations. Why should they be forced into it?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:58 PM
16

You are saying that after one year of living together the law should apply the equivalent as if they are married.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:42 PM
26

Why should the government force couples to marry when they don't want to marry? If the man and the woman want the benefits and obligations of marrying, they know what they have to do. But if they don't want them, why should they be forced into it?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:24 PM
1

They know. This article is the nth shaming strategy from a desperate woman. It is kind of funny how hard they try.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:38 AM
4

Women routinely hit their husbands, which is already illegal, and nothing happens. People even laughs about it, they find it funny. What do you think will happen when man complains about his wife being mean to him?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:34 AM
2

Don't link directly to racist organizations like the NYT or Stormfront. Find another source or use archive.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:23 AM
1

What country you trying to access it? I'm not in the USA and it still works for me.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:18 PM
1

Works for me.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:31 PM
11

It is not weird. That men will be gentleman if women behave lady-like is the old gender agreement. Even if you refuse this agreement and want a different thing, it is impossible to disagree with that sentence. The problem, as another commenter pointed out, is that feminists want men to keep acting like gentleman with no obligations for the female. That is not a balanced situation.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:23 AM
5

Read what first wave feminists said about men and you'll find plenty of man hating there.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:12 AM
8

I understand the government can not blindly prosecute women with no evidence as this would result in less women wanting to come out. This feminist argument was bullshit from the start. Nobody is saying: oh, please, don't prosecute people who lie about getting rob or nobody will denounce robberies. Oh please, don't prosecute people who lie about insurance accidents or nobody will use insurance... It is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:11 AM
1

How do you know?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:15 AM
6

It is a shame that feminists have turned the sentence "toxic masculinity" into meaning traditional masculine values are toxic, when they are not. You could argue that "soy boys" when their passive aggressiveness and their immaturity is a type of toxic masculinity, but that is not what they mean by it.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:14 AM
8

Basically, that women are universally oppressed and that men have all the power in a patriarchal system, which is simply not reality. This is the biggest scam feminism has pulled out on the world. It is amazing how many people believe and live their lives believing this falsehood. One of the biggest social engineering successes of human history.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:38 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:25 PM
0

He already was but his government is giving a lot of money to feminists so they hid it under the carpet. Believe the victim only counts when it is one of the "bad" guys.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:03 PM
6

See this comment above that includes an archive link: https://reddit.com/comments/975a6t/comment/e45ngx9 Basically you go to http://archive.is , put the link to the original webpage and it will give you a link to the copy of the page, so everybody following your post goes to the copy and not to the original article and the racist publication does not receive views and thus no publicity money. Starve the racists. If you link to a non racist and non misandrist publication you can link them directl…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:56 AM
15

Do not link directly to a racist and misandrist publication. Use an archive link.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:06 AM
3

It is the college bourgeois communist revolution.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:03 AM
3

Do not link to a racist and misandrist publication directly, use an archive link
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:30 AM
1

I agree, but dressed as a woman pleases the feminist crew that might have complained otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:56 PM
78

She has influence and we clearly see how she is using it.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:47 PM
14

First time I heard about what he was doing I though he was paranoid and completely exaggerating. Time has proven I was utterly wrong and he was right.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:13 AM
1

Of course there is typical women stuff, same as there is typical men stuff. Don't be absurd. And it has nothing to do with evilness.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 07:47 AM
3

men were the one who held the power False. Even if you just look naively at society, it was a few selected men that had power. Most men had no power in government or any other important institution. But then you have to look at who got benefited. You have to take into consideration that, while women have in-group bias, men have out-group bias. Men do not tend to side with each other like women do, but actually tend to compete against each other and favor women. So, despite the childish claims of…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:23 AM
7

And what happened with the men? They were slaughtered. Nobody is saying that women did not get shit in the past. The point is that women were not oppressed by men as a class. Because men and women are different, they were affected differently. But to look at the shit women got while ignoring the shit men got to claim women were oppressed is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:25 PM
3

Because they are under represented in most things like government and the like. That does not mean they are oppressed (let alone being a minority, but the minority thing when applied to women means oppressed, not literal minority).
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:59 PM
8

Historically women have been oppressed False. That is just feminist history revisionism. Men and women had tougher lives in the past and they both had the expectation to comply with their gender roles, but that does not mean that men as a class oppressed women. Feminist history revisionism becomes absolutely ludicrous the moment you actually read history.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:57 PM
1

Politically you do have USA lens, whether you live there or not. Conservatives in Europe are not more left wing than in the USA, they are just not (classical) liberal.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:02 AM
2

The problem is you have USA lens. But in the rest of the world, classic liberalism never took hold as it did in the USA. Your constitution is the most (classic) liberal constitution there is in the world. In the USA conservatives have (classic) liberal roots. Conservatives in the USA are trying to conserve the classic liberal roots. They have been influenced and have wandered politically but the roots are there. In Europe and most parts of the world that is not the case, the countries were never…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:51 AM
4

The right is only individualistic (and in theory) in the USA. In the European countries, conservatives do not come from the classical liberal tradition.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 11:29 PM
13

Misandrists and racists.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:14 AM
3

She accused him of hitting or sexually abuse the kids.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:07 PM
53

I am still amazed that basic biological facts have become a divide between left and right. Specially with the left going from being pro science and even insulting others based on it, to be science deniers in less then a decade. I'm just dumfounded by the whole situation, specially because biology should have never been a left-right issue to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:28 PM
2

Lots of criminals are going to identify as women suddenly.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 06:02 AM
-9

Nothing good is ever going to cone out of the descendent of the criminals anyway... Nuke away!
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:54 AM
-5

It is reasonable for public facing jobs to have rules for how employees look.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 09:34 AM
20

The NYT is a racist anti male organization.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:40 AM
16

Two things: The obvious double standard of male feminist when someone else is accused vs when they are accused. Fucking weasels. The implications of this sentence on how these nutjobs think: Acknowledge and believe the survivor even if their account does not fit with his sense of self. Reality not real. Does not matter what happened. She feels raped and you need to "acknowledge and believe" regardless of what happened.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 01:00 PM
5

I don't trust the msm recollection of anything because we have seen how they lie when it comes to feminism. That say, the way the article is written makes him look bad and the suspension seems justified. Again, only if the article is reporting the interview fairly, which I have no confidence they are doing.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:47 PM
2

We are already being called everything in the book. Why do you care?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:51 AM
3

We need to do this.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:17 PM
19

Her: "You all white people suck, you are like goblins, I enjoy fucking with you, I'm glad you'll all go extinct soon" Response: "This person is racist and not fit to be an editor at the NYT" NYT: "She is being attacked for being Asian and female." OK...
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:16 PM
100

Is there any doubt?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:03 PM
20

It was a joke defense. Did not work for Rosanne, because she had WrongThinking but it will work for this one because she has RightThinking.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:46 PM
6

Dark
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:04 PM
9

Even of you are right from a legal point of view, it is still possible to report on Netflix bias.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:03 PM
2

Apologizing at first wasn't a mistake as you pushed him, even if pushed yourself. Continue to apologize and buying him a drink was a big mistake. He was just in a power trip trying to get as much misery out of the situation as possible. That is why you feel so angry, you got treated as a fool and you allowed it to happen. Use this as a lesson for the next time. The next time you apologize, be looking for the person using it as a power trip. If you detect its happening again, square up, do not ap…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 06:53 AM
57

Yes, it has been only 6 months because he has RightThinking (TM)
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:51 PM
20

Yes, the suffragettes were a bunch of rich white women with racist and classist ideas, that were even despised by other women rights activists of the time. And let's not forget they were also terrorists.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:03 PM
40

the first 2 waves was positive for the society I completely disagree. The first wave feminists were a bunch of racist classist rich white women who were even despised by other women rights groups. Which leads us to the "school version" of feminism most used claim: the first got women to vote Feminists were one of the groups among several other women rights activists that were pushing for women to vote. Attributing it all to feminism is inaccurate. In fact, in the USA feminists delayed the right …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:57 PM
56

1st wave and 2nd wave were also men haters. Stop pretending they weren't because you are trying to defend a history of feminism that does not exist. Sure, there were some trying a different approach, but as always in feminism, guess which ones won? Feminism is an ideology that introduces hate for men in the law, communications, academics and society in general. Why should we care that a few of them tried to be more coherent but lost? I care about the effects of feminism in society, and that has …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:17 PM
32

That would be true if the feminism before her did not suffer from the same ills, which it did.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:12 PM
35

Reasoning is too generous for what this guy brain does
/r/MensRights28/07/18 04:07 PM
14

He looks exactly as one would expect. I hope no one in his family or friends contracts HIV because they had sex with someone who did not reveal they had HIV.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:50 PM
6

There are a lot of over educated dumb people. Just trained like monkeys to say the "right thing" without being able to analyze what it means.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:02 PM
1

Literally.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:55 PM
14

Do not link them directly!! I down vote every direct link to these people. They create outrageous articles to get clicks. By linking them directly you are giving them clicks (money) and promote more articles like this. Remove the post and re-post linking to an archive link, for example using http://archive.is/ .
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:15 AM
426

The Narrative must go on. Women must always be the oppressed ones.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:45 AM
11

It is not about her getting pissed, its about responsibility and accountability. I refuse to help a person that believes I oppress her and I should pay for it.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:30 AM
8

Do not link them directly!! I down vote every direct link to these people. They create outrageous articles to get clicks. By linking them directly you are giving them clicks (money) and promote more articles like this. Remove the post and re-post linking to an archive link, for example using http://archive.is/ .
/r/MensRights25/07/18 08:20 PM
117

If I see a woman who looks woke and independent, I make an effort to not help her even when I get the instinct to do it. I had one situation when the woman even looked at me expecting my help and I looked back at her kind of like saying: "what?". If she is woke and independent, she is woke and independent for everything.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:32 PM
10

These bourgeois revolutionaries are just cute. They get stupid ideas in their head, make the life of people around them more miserable than it should be and then spend the rest of their lives frustrated and wondering which part of their great plan failed.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:16 PM
21

As I said some boys get discouraged obviously.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 11:55 AM
229

Funnily enough it toughens up the boys who make it and it weakens the girls. Obviously it also discourages some boys. But of the boys who "make it" it toughen them up because they get used to work harder than the girls.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 11:44 AM
13

What kind of power do you have over where the main feminist institutions go ideologically? What kind of power do you have over what measures the feminists with influence in government push for? If the answer to both the above questions is none or close to none, I'm sorry but you don't count and it is fair to say feminism in general even when you disagree.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:34 PM
1

All the cases I've seen it was preventive prison, so no new trial was needed. There could be some different case I'm not aware of, of course.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 06:52 PM
2

Congratulations. This means you and modern feminists share the idea that men and women do not have basic instincts and tendencies. The only difference is that feminist use it to claim inequality where there are only choices guided by natural tendencies, while you are trying to justify being a modern version of a male that conforms with stupid PC culture expectations and that can not be because it goes against male natural tendencies.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 10:02 AM
25

I identify as a woman while parking there. Such is the life of parking-gender-fluid people.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:11 AM
1

A suggestion, society keeps telling boys and men, sometimes very subtlety sometimes not so much, that showing emotion is acting like women, feminine. But that is false IMO, it is just that males express emotions in a different way than females. Today in the west, men spaces and masculine role models are mostly gone, so young men have never learned from them. Instead they only have feminized indoctrination, but what you learn does not mesh well with your natural instincts. Hence the tension. So m…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:47 PM
3

Men express emotions, we just do it in a different way to women. When I insult a friend I am showing my emotions, I am telling him how much I trust him. When a friend comes to me with a problem, I show my emotion by silently listening to him so he knows I'm there for him. Women make bigger displays of emotion, but that does not mean they feel more, just that they put a bigger show.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:39 AM
31

Just stop using Facebook.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:04 AM
13

I really don't understand how some women get the "man treatment" while others get the pussy pass. I can only imagine some judges are pussies and fall for the act.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:21 PM
6

Wait until men realize they can fuck a work competitor by accusing them of rape. It is going to happen.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:44 AM
4

Men are socialized to be stronger because opreshun. It is the only possible and logical explanation.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:45 AM
5

Fisherfighter kind of fits.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:01 PM
1

Your feminist sources can play feminist politics all you want. Reality does not care. That wall you are hitting is the biological differences between men and women. Gender is the cultural expression of your sex. Assuming them independent to push your delusions makes no sense.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:31 AM
9

He gives money to feminists, so they'll let it go. You just wait.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:29 PM
7

Sexual assault happens. The level of hysteria feminist create about it is fake and unwarranted. That is why you see the fake statistics of 1 in 4, the fake rape stories in the press, ...
/r/MensRights07/07/18 04:33 AM
1

But they are linked. Gender is the cultural expression of the sex.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:35 PM
5

Because they've been using feminism and misogyny as a shield to be assholes for so long that they are surprised when it does not work. What killed them here is that the community member was very gracious before and after. If you read the twitter exchange, after she accuses him of sexists, he says did not have that intention and will leave her alone. When someone comes in his defence, he tells him to leave it alone, that he wants no more of it. Instead of realizing she is out of line and apologiz…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:11 PM
6

That's what governments do.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 08:30 PM
7

You treated her equal to a man, misogynist!
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:37 PM
197

Exactly. Use the bullshit against them.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:35 PM
14

AFAIK, he is still going forward with his case against Google. He has a subreddit r/jamesdamore , although its not very active.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:23 PM
49

Its more perverse than that. Gender violence is defined as the systemic (yes, that word) violence men exercise on their female partners (but not women on their male partners obviously).
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:19 PM
1

Because believing that you can scape your nature is egocentric.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:30 PM
4

But less and less men are doing so. A lot of men are retreating from this game. My hypothesis is because there are fewer and fewer women worth supporting. These men would still love to support a woman but do not find one worth doing it. The tragedy is that, deep down, most of these women would love to be loved and supported by these men, they just don't know how to do it. They have been educated into a toxic mentality justified by feminism fake history, "men dominated women in the past, it is ou…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:10 PM
3

Yes. Feminists even rejected a woman from joining their organization because she was not rich enough and it would make them look bad.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:01 PM
1

It does not matter if we even become over civilized. Evolution is always going to be there one way or another. Civilization just changes how the genetic competitions expresses itself. The only choice to overcome male disposability is if technology somehow completely changed the balance between the sexes, and even then the instincts would take thousands of years to go away. Basically, male disposability is not going away, it will express itself one way or another. Your best option is accept it an…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:37 PM
8

Its opposite is the theory that all the differences between men and women in society are driven by the male and female essential natures. Not true. The opposition has always claimed that the human behaviour was a mix of nature and nurture. And they were right. The "its all socialization" side has attacked the opposition by claiming they believed it was all nature, but that was never true. If you read what the scientist attacking the "tabula rasa" theory were saying you'll see they always claimed…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:09 AM
1

The thing is, do we really want to reproduce the laws of nature? The egocentrism of this sentence is astounding. Why do you assume you can scape your biological imperative?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:39 PM
1

So no Carter to each woman demand is being pathologically hateful about women? You have mental issues.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:10 PM
2

Control men behaviour.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:03 PM
18

This is not a good thing. The good man project is a feminists initiative who's main theme is that men need to step up to end up The Patriarchy (TM), that is do more things for women. It has nothing to do with improving men existence, but about telling men how to make women existence better. It is just another stupid trick by feminists to tell you how you have to be.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:01 AM
1

So feminism has affected your generation but not femized it? That's a rough argument to make IMO.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:34 PM
1

I don't have the graph here but check the male suicide rate over the years in the USA. After the 60-70's, when feminism influence is getting very strong, male suicide more than doubles and keeps growing slowly after that. Now tell me again your generation has not been affected by feminism and feminized compared to the ones before. And yes, the generations after yours are even worse. But to ignore the damage feminism has done to your generation is ridiculous and delusional. Hell, the metro sexual…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:59 AM
3

Gen X is definitively more feminized than the generations that came before. Not as much as milenials, but for sure more than the men that came before. Saying Gen X is doing fine is ridiculous, even if its not as bad as the ones that came after.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:21 AM
27

It worked with The Patriarchy, why would it not work with Emotional Labor? Weak men will try to adjust to these new demands too. Just wait and see.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 04:45 PM
4

She shouldn't.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:23 PM
5

I agree with you that she was not the best person by leading him on. She took advantage of him. She is not a blameless innocent victim, things did not just happened to her. Let's be clear, she actively took advantage of him. Also, yes, she most probably flirted from the distance and signaled the other guy so he eventually came over and provoked the whole situation. And she probably was proud and enjoying that two guys were going all caveman because of her. This all sound like what happened. And …
/r/MensRights29/06/18 03:21 PM
2

Over the internet and with only a picture there is no way to test who is right, so we'll have to leave it at a disagreement.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:15 PM
1

My points are: BMI only fails when the person trains and is very muscular. Otherwise it assumes the person has an average muscle mass for his height. Its not perfect, but it is quite good for how cheap it is. The first guy in the picture is not muscular, he does not appear to have an out of average musculation. He is obese. Edit: and I asked you if you were american because studies have shown that USAmericans are the people in the world most likely to underestimate how fat a person is, most like…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:33 PM
1

On the contrary. We should never target legally what people can say or can not say, that is use violence to control speech. It should be a civil matter, where people can vote with their wallets or with their protests what they think is an appropriate or inappropriate message.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:18 PM
3

Do you have reading comprehension problems?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:16 PM
1

Haha, typical. Everybody has some muscle, the short thin guy also has some muscle. That's already factored in the BMI. The BMI only fails when the person trains hard and is very muscular. That guy is not very muscular, he is obese.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:20 PM
0

Are you american? I bet you the BMI of the first guy is in the obese range.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 06:50 PM
4

This is not about fat acceptance, it is about promoting unhealthy life styles. In a lot of western countries, showing smoking ads near schools is forbidden. Why? Because it promotes an unhealthy life style. It is not good to normalize unhealthy life styles. What happens when kids see fat people all smiling and normalized? How is that different from seeing happy people smoking? On top of that, the first guy is probably pass overweight and into obese range. This ad is atrocious. There is no need f…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 04:52 PM
1

Why not tell everybody?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 04:12 PM
-6

Promoting obesity as normal is never pretty nice.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:46 PM
-8

Don't confuse feminists with women. Most women are not feminists.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 02:19 PM
3

And why shouldn't we game the system? Yeah, well said, why shouldn't we? And who is saying we should not?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:10 PM
15

You are just making a legal change to game the system. You don't have to change your personality or your believes.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:54 PM
5

Way back when women couldn't own land, work most jobs, This was never the case, at least not generally.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 10:08 AM
2

The concept of toxic masculinity is wrong. Not just the name. For example, there is nothing wrong with natural male aggression, as long as it is correctly channelled into being productive. In fact, when feminists try to tell men to not act so aggressively and to be note sensitive (more like women) is when men get confused and end up lashing out. When men learn to channel their natural aggression, usually by learning from other men, they don't lash out. Problem is feminists have no idea what it f…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:59 AM
38

He opposes the postmodernists.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 12:00 AM
7

If you have someone you love who is fat, you should encourage them to lose weight. Enabling their dysfunctional weight by telling them its alright or calling them substitute fake names like heavy instead of what they are, fat, is the opposite of love. You are not helping them. Being fat is not OK and if you love someone you should be honest with them.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:29 AM
59

Indeed, but notice how the men are called heavy when I doubt they really mean heavy as in muscular.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:27 AM
4

It is a shame it was written by a Neo-Nazi and is riddle with guilt by association, because it is a very good quote regardless of the ideology of the author.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:21 AM
2

It didn't though.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 10:34 AM
1

I sympathize with the sentiment, but you have to realize that your parenting will never be neutral. And also that your kids sometimes need direction and the direction you will give them will never be neutral. Kids are not adults, they need strong direction in occasions. As I said I sympathize with the sentiment and it is important to give space to kids to experiment and be free (I wish my feminist mother though the same). But at the same time, they are kids and sometimes they need to be told wha…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 08:38 PM
0

Yes and no. The only point where I disagree in what you say is that gender stereotypes should not be enforced at all. Stereotypes are not always right but they exist for a reason. There are studies showing that gender stereotypes are mostly in line with what biology is discovering. The reason being because stereotypes are a low level common way of describing reality. Most people do not have the time or capacity of systematize and explain the world, but they do see the patterns even if they can n…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 08:00 PM
3

It is very necessary to tell your kids that males and females are different, physically and mentally. It helps them understand and adapt better to the world instead of going around confused. Specifically to your question, your boy will see that his sister is doing certain things that he might not get but work. If he understand that human females develop social awareness quicker than males, he will not feel inferior to her. Otherwise he will be confused and might develop insecurities. My mother w…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 07:25 PM
12

This is the crux of feminism: Convince yourself of the false idea that women have been oppressed by men over history, so you can justify being an asshole.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:54 PM
4

that both have equal potential. That's just being a reasonable parent. If you're telling your daughter that she is limited by her gender .... you're not non-feminist, you're an asshole verging on being an abusive parent. Excuse me? Both boys and girls are limited by their sex/gender. For example, your daughter will never be (naturally) as strong as your son. Your boy will never be as socially intuitive as your daughter, as her brain connects differently. Both men and women are limited by their b…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:52 PM
4

Not only a job. She got a millions a year job.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:07 PM
9

Feminist know. This is just a way to leech tax payer money.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:38 AM
1

Of course, there is a relation. For example, men take more risks than women, which tends to lead to situations of make or break it. In general, males are the experimental sex of nature, not only in humans, in nature in general. It is normal to see males dominating the extremes of any statistics, while women tend to be more average.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:57 AM
2

Men make the extremes, for the good and for the bad (most homeless are men). Women tend more towards the average.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 09:03 PM
19

You don't necessarily look like your ancestors. You look like some combination of their characteristics. Some combinations look better than others.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:13 PM
1

Only higher ups decide what's really on the curriculum, everything but your "regular" folk, whatever that means. And yes, a society where people is more free thinker is a much better society, more prosperous and more happy in general.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:36 AM
1

Government education does not mean a more educated population, it means a note docile population. The interests of government go against properly educating people.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:07 AM
2

They do. It's just in biology/psychology/sociology you speak of tendencies, not absolutes like in physics and chemistry. Women do tend to have a protective and nurturing instinct towards children. But it does not mean they all do or they do all the time.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:01 AM
3

Why use logic when you just want to push a narrative?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:25 AM
1

Equality for feminism is code for privilege.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:34 AM
3

When objectivity is thrown out the window, any idea is valid as long as you use big words and convoluted sentences.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:47 PM
11

You blame the nearest man. For not stepping in or something.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:35 PM
3

They still count your visit and increase the rank even if they don't get money from showing you ads.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 05:36 PM
8

What does it matter what you do when you are linking for others?
/r/MensRights31/05/18 11:35 AM
11

If it pisses you off why are you linking directly and giving them money? Use an archive link. I down vote any link to this type of sites.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 10:36 AM
5

Teach women not to make false rape allegations
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:46 AM
10

Feminists are women supremacists, but they don't want to say it outright because they know there would be a huge drop in support. That is what you see all this schenerigans and stupid arguments. Feminists are happy boys are being discriminated against and girls are coming on top. They would like more of it and will discriminate more against boys if they can. Don't expect any empathy for boys from feminists. That is also why feminists policies about rape make no sense if you assume feminism is fo…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:43 AM
14

The issue is, it is false that your grand father had more privileges than your grand mother. It is a feminist myth created to justify their assholery. The life of most men 3, 4, 5... generations ago was pretty miserable, with demanding physical jobs that would end up breaking them and making them die earlier than their females counterparts. With nobody giving a shit about them. Being manipulated into going to wars to serve as cannon fodder. With a culture of drowning their sorrows in alcohol. Su…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:13 PM
18

It is not a surprise for feminist. The explanation is clear: the patriarchy strikes again.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 06:25 AM
1

I was talking of paternity tests in general, but you do have a point. The thing is the mother fetus is already being tested for genetic defects by default and adding a paternity test does not increase the cost too much.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:17 PM
9

You will end up paying their debt forgiveness through taxes. That is what happens now in the USA when you plan ahead, take sensible risks and are responsible.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:57 PM
1

In a few places like France you can not. In most places you can.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:39 PM
5

If asking for a paternity test, produces that reaction from your partner, then you should be happy to be single.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:01 AM
4

OK, not in France, but the problem there is that you are not allowed a paternity test (without mother consent or judge order). It has nothing to do with it being mandatory or not.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:25 PM
13

You don't need it to be law. You can ask a paternity test in the tests they do to the fetus. Really, it is that simple, just ask for it.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:07 PM
4

Watch older shows, they say those things about women. I prefer when series were able and did bash whoever they wanted. But then feminism and PC culture came in and made it a though crime to bash on women, but not on men. And there is where we are now. I would like to be able to bash both, but it has to be both or none. The present situation is completely one-sided.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:07 PM
86

No, in their minds women are angels that would rule the world with absolute kindness and empathy if only they were in power instead of those evil brute men. It is absolutely ridiculous and childish but that is how they see things. They really believe it.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:04 AM
59

The driver issue and who is better, men or women, is a funny one. Men do have greater spatial capacity than women, which gives us better driving skills. Women do have more accidents than men. But at the same time men are more daring and risk takers (testosterone is a hell of a drug), so when men have accidents they tend to be much more serious, with serious injuries or even deaths. So women do have more accidents but they tend to be small and non important, while men have more accidents with ser…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:39 PM
42

Lawyers are always the biggest winners on any legal dispute.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:31 AM
2

I'm generalizing, obviously.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:03 PM
75

Sharing? They want the man to pay.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:45 PM
3

Yeah, a bit late to worry about that.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 01:52 PM
3

It's not really. I'm European but this idea that Europe is more left leaning than the USA is false and just a result of traditional political rhetoric, not the ideas.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:42 AM
1

I tend to think over education exists, but in any case what it is sure is that college in the present day is creating a lot of highly educated dumb people.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:16 AM
1

There are conflicting forces. For one, when we perceive danger, we tend to stick with whoever looks similar as initial instinct. On the other hand we feel sexually attracted to exotic, because outside genes can help strengthen the genetic pool with lacking characteristics. There is more to this, but my point is that looking only to the danger reaction is myopic. Humans do appreciate diversity because it can be advantageous. The issue is this nonsensical forced diversity. Humans mingle together n…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:18 AM
9

Actually diversity is good. The problem is forced diversity, it is nonsensical. But naturally humans appreciate diversity.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:55 PM
3

Psychological test have shown women cope with stress worse than men. There is nothing surprising about what they are saying. The problem is the constant hammering of feminists claiming men and women are equal, except for a few physical differences. The reality is there is overwhelming evidence that men and women have some few mental differences that make a big difference in specific areas. But because of the feminist hammering people are confused when they appear in real life.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:39 PM
10

The preferred term for killing the homeless and unemployed is World War.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:14 PM
258

What planet do these people live on? Do you get paid to propose these nonsense? How do I join? I have a lot of stupid ideas.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 11:31 AM
5

Don't forget that first wave feminists were a bunch of rich white women who were unrepentantly racist and rejected poor women from joining. I can not understand why people assume feminism was a great movement without actually looking at their history.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:26 AM
23

Women tend to consume more than men. It changes from country to country but in western countries women make around 80% of the spending. So targeting women to buy your product drives more sells than targeting men. Also, women tend more towards consensus while men tend to be more independent. So it is easier to influence women using ads to make them believe what the consensus is. Note how ads targeting men use the independent "cowboy" archetype much more. So women make most of the spending and ten…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:29 PM
1

Italian girls are crazy and domineering. The gender relationship culture in that country is an spectacle.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:17 PM
23

The problem with all feminine take overseas in history is that they never become dominant and progress, but they become stagnant and dwindle. Enjoy the decline.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 09:13 AM
35

Teach women not to prostitute their children.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter