TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

karma1337a Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by karma1337a on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you were knocked out for several hours by a blow to the temple, YOU NEED AN MRI NOW! Don't wait, get yourself to urgent care (or the ER, if Urgent Care is closed) and explain what happened. Have someone else drive you, if you can.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:48 AM
1

It's a conundrum. On the one hand, paternity tests give Redpills another way to control women. On the other hand, it limits their biological prerogative as alfalfas to sow their wild oats. So, they have to choose between trying to control women or trying to control women. It's a tough choice.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:09 PM
1

Women are crazy. All of them total unrelenting hamster banshees, no exceptions. It's in their DNA, bro. Plus psychology and biotruths. Some just have a little extra cherry of crazy on top. What's that? No, no... it can't be, it's... my conscience ! It's making me think about reasonable people of the female persuasion! and female relatives! It's making me feel upset for deriving personalities and sanity based on sexual dimorphism! It's even making me feel bad for discriminating against people wit…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:22 AM
2

but sexual strategy is amoral and all women inevitably 'hamster' and justify their 'crazy' actions because they never emotionally mature beyond young teenagers. This is all easily gleaned from redpill, mostly from the sidebar links.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:12 AM
1

No. Redpills think women are biologically driven to pick a "beta orbiter" to provide for them, but pick an "alpha" to be the genetic father of their children. So it makes sense that redpills would be against widespread paternity tests, because they could (strictly theoretically) end up dealing with many of the consequences as they would be the genetic father of many of these children. It's written from the perspective of a woman's choice, but that could easily be a red herring.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:56 AM
6

Achh, looks like you're right. Google suggests that it's from a now-deactivated tumblr called "feminismrising." However, it's worth noting that the only four hits for that particular blurb come from MRA sites and a bodybuilding forum. It may have been a troll blog. It's not a perspective that makes sense from a feminist perspective, though. As far as I can tell, feminists who believe that pregnancy should be that solitary of an act usually eschew the institution of marriage altogether. This is a…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:43 AM
-14

Actually, it was likely written by a redpill to defend their alpha/beta theory. It matches up pretty well.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:38 PM
7

Um... I think you're overlooking the fact that pregnancy occurs in women's bodies. In order for a father to "kill his unborn child" without active involvement of the woman he impregnanted, he has to violently assault, poison, or incapacitate her in some way. Obviously, that's repugnant.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 04:09 AM
0

It's not called "DM," we're not on twitter. Plus what would be the point of that on a public forum? If things actually happened the way this woman described it (?) then yes, it could qualify as rape. However, it seems like she's just bad at describing what's called "Consensual non-consent." Now, before you roll your eyes, it's actually a simple concept. You and your partner talk about what you want to do before you get in bed. My guess is that she said to her partner something to the effect of. …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 02:14 PM
1

Esmeralda eyes...
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:20 AM
3

there is no spousal rape. If your wife is crying in the corner, pushing you away and begging for you leave her alone, and you force yourself on her, that's rape.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 08:42 PM
-2

I got that. I meant beyond the hypothetical. Yes, the draft should be ended, but how? Pointing out that a conservative female writer from the 60s told a young man not to draft dodge doesn't achieve that. What congressmen are you writing to? What bills are you watching? What bills should be overturned?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:07 AM
0

That's not what I said.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:57 PM
-6

Rather they want to be seen as wanting to solve the problem while keeping it in place. Evidence? And for that matter, what solutions are the MRA offering? EDIT: seriously... I can't have a conversation if you instantly down vote me, reddit won't let me respond.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:35 PM
-3

Stuff like VAWA, equal pay act etc. probably get through because it's really simple to say, "hey, we as a society have a history of victimizing women. Let's not." At the very least, if one were to disagree that there has been widespread victimization and disparity, one would be hard pressed to say there should be. Militarism is a much more complex issue, one that has, for the record, mostly been designed and pushed by male leaders. A lack of presence in the law books doesn't equal a lack of pass…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:16 PM
-6

Admittedly, there's a paucity of feminist literature specifically about the draft. However, there is tons and tons of literature against militarism, which is a more prescient issue and goes hand in hand with the draft. Why make an enemy out of a movement that agrees with you on this?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:22 PM
-9

... Go find me a feminist in favor of the draft. /r/feminism doesn't count. Edit: darn it, if you downvote me, I can't respond to you b/c reddit sets a timer on me. Can you at least hold off until the thread cools down a bit? 5th_Law, I have an answer for you, I just need to be able to post it.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:12 PM
-2

How so? What was wrong with my statement?
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 01:48 AM
4

Top comment: As long as both parties are consenting adults, I don't care. Further comments expand on uncomfortability with OP actively seeking out really young women in his mid* 20s, and distinguish that from a romance that happens to bloom with an incidental age gap.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 06:29 AM
3

I frequent /r/twoX and haven't seen that. I may have seen the same thread and interpreted it differently, that's why I'm asking you for a specific example.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 05:47 AM
3

Could you show me an example within the fempire?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 05:43 AM
-21

Not ignoring, just pointing out the fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 05:34 AM
-27

biotruths...
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 05:00 AM
-3

WTF is NAWALT? Do I even want to know? Edit: Ohhh... Well, what do you want me to do? Distill the feminist movement into a bite-sized drop for you to hate? It's a huge, complex movement with a lot of internal debate. Well two can play this game Every single act a human being takes could be construed as manipulation FALLACY OF COMPOSITION Women are socialized to extract any and all resources PRIVILAGE BLINDNESS biological reproductive strategies BIOTRUTHS +1 See, that probably wasn't super elucid…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 04:49 AM
6

Explain to me the problem with those posters, exactly? Also, original comment edited to expand on objectification.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 03:04 AM
-28

You do see the irony in defining that last example as objectification in a sub dedicated to manipulating women, yes?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 03:01 AM
8

I've only heard the 18/30 double standard as you'be described brought up by men. While I imagine it's happened, I can't recall a time when a female feminist brought it up as such. Now, when a 30 year old specifically manipulates a much younger woman, or intentionally targets much younger women, that's when feminists tend to get upset, particularly in the context of a society that likes to fetishize young women as "easy prey." But, most feminist work goes towards getting everyone to recognize the…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 02:46 AM
39

Okay, here goes: Dear Feminists and Women, How are you? It's me, redpillschool. Just checking up on things. Hi. Oh myself? I'm not doing so well. Another person just tried to shame me for enjoying my sexuality. I know, it's pretty bad that we live in a society that encourages this. According to you, only stupid women have sex with me. I wonder if you'd say that to their face? I mean, she was just enjoying her sexuality. Something you feminists appear to be in favor for. Why are you being discrim…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/13 05:37 PM
21

I'm a feminist, and I can actually reply to you if you want. I can't tell if this is a rant, or an actual letter. Would you like me to?
/r/TheRedPill13/04/13 07:13 PM
2

I got banned from r/feminism. I still don't know why.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:37 PM
2

At least one actually belong to /SRS I thought that was just a running joke?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:40 PM
3

Then I don't understand. why is "raising X not to be y" problematic if it doesn't imply that "X is Y by default" ?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:22 PM
-20

Raising someone not to be something doesn't imply that they would be that something by default if they weren't raised that way.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:59 PM
-14

But... these things are important. Well, the first and the third. Second one isn't really a thing. What's wrong with raising someone to be sensitive to the prejudices of minorities and learning how to avoid them?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:44 PM
2

Also it's kind of not an equal comparison. Someone was gangraped in South Africa, and of course that's horrific, but the 2012 Delhi gang rape case involved a young woman, traveling with a male friend on a bus, who was sodomized to death with a crowbar with the enthusiastic participation of the bus driver. One day later, two minors had been raped, and one was killed. And then there were protests in New Delhi. So it's like, an incident of gang rape in South Africa versus an endemic of sometimes fa…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:21 PM
1

The perpetrators were men in both situations, though.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:41 PM
1

Him.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:34 PM
-1

It sounds like a porn culture issue.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:49 AM
4

You can't just assume every romantic or sexual interaction begins at a bar and is determined in 15 seconds...
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:39 AM
1

highly successful women, because of societal pressure to marry "down", not women who are hypothetically taking advantage of the gender imbalance.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:45 PM
1

Do you have evidence that these women exist?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:56 AM
1

I think it's worth noting that we're dealing with hetero-normative beauty ideals here. "Objectification" of a sort has existed in the male gay community for a while. I also think you're not casting a wide enough net. Objectification of women isn't really about finding them beautiful, it's the idea that beauty is the sum of their white teeth, small nose, shiny hair, perky breasts etc. Basically, that women are a bunch of individually attractive pieces which add together to create a body, with lit…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:54 AM
3

Touché, though I did intend it to be thought of it a broader way than a literal way. Also, the editorializing is unnecessary. I could say that mine is the thoughtful, considerate, and decent way while yours in the rape-y bacchanailian way. It doesn't help the discussion.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 10:15 AM
-3

You don't get to decide that for someone else.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:26 AM
-1

...Really? This sailor just learned that he survived World War II, that it was over, and you're comparing him to a teacher who's trying to fuck her students? Really? You're using the circumstances of the sailor as justification for grabbing a woman off the street?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:03 AM
0

If she didn't have a problem with it (she didn't)... then what's the problem? 35 teacher seduces 15 year old student. If the student doesn't have a problem with it, then what's the problem? You can't decide someone else's sexual boundaries for them. Even if they're okay with whatever you did, that doesn't mean it was justified. I've had quite a few girls run up and hug me/kiss me without asking for my permission first... believe it or not I didn't die. That's not to say I liked it, but their int…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:49 AM
-1

The hypocrisy is bothering me. There's so much on this sub about how sexual abuse against men is trivialized more than that of women, but then here's a woman who got grabbed and kissed in broad daylight, and it's okay because history and context and she's not complaining.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:34 AM
-15

Do you realize the story behind this picture? A soldier grabbed her, tilted her over, planted the kiss, and then went on his way. That's not okay! How would you feel if some stranger went up to you and did the same thing?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:21 AM
1

Yes. They are, however... No they're not. If you buy someone a drink, that's on you.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:24 PM
2

I don't think you understand what feminist means. A few random redditors (who haven't declared themselves feminist fwiw) discussing the ability of women to adjust to different levels of sex hardly seems like a feminist "fact". Particularly when most of the female voices on the page disagree.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:19 AM
2

feminist theory says men have no sexual plasticity Eh? The whole first chapter of the Second Sex is devoted to the vast sexual diversity present in nature. On top of that, many feminist theories (yes plural, it's not a monolithic movement) strive for the abolition of socialized gender, and with it the stigma of sharp divisions of sexual expression.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:07 AM
-5

Okay, first off, we were talking about hypotheticals if something were to happen, not the nature of determining said crime. Two different things. Second of all, and more importantly being raped is not something you do, being raped is something that happens to you. If a man gets behind the wheel of a car drunk, that's his responsibility. If a man is sitting outside of a bar drunk, and a car looses control and he can't get out of the way fast enough because he's drunk, that's not his fault, that's…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:47 AM
-4

Not when considering the flipside, which would be allowing people like you to trivialize serious sexual assault as "a bad decision." Also prosecutable shouldn't be the defining matter, particularly with a crime that is, by nature, often difficult to demonstrate to outside parties.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:57 AM
-6

So, if... It depends. It's actually entirely possible for two people to rape each other.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:34 AM
-8

Are you saying... Yes. Yes, that is in fact what I am saying. If someone offers another a drink, that person is not obligated to return your favor with sexual acts or romantic interest. Alternatively... 0.0 holey crap, dude. That is rape. Sleeping with a drunk woman who wouldn't consent if she weren't under the influence is rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:54 AM
-5

thanks.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:33 AM
-8

They taught me love, respect, and tolerance. I think I turned out alright.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:09 AM
-5

On the basis of one reddit comment? How so?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:09 AM
-10

If you have a problem... Please don't tell me how to act in my personal relationships. Also, nice assumption about my sexuality. There's no such thing as false accusation You got my style but missed my point. There is such a thing, but societally the way women are forced to look at sex and sexual relationships, it's infinitesimal in comparison. It really is. Men want to talk things through... You kind of proved my point by once again missing what I was saying, which isn't that men don't want to …
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:58 AM
-17

A woman who just wants a free meal, and... Because women should understand that they should never accept friendly gestures from a man without understanding that they are implicitly offering sexual interest. A woman who hints, decieves... Because in a society where women are constantly pressured to be docile and polite, you shouldn't respect her if she isn't utterly direct and straight forward with you. Or if she is, but she's saying things you don't want to hear. Plus there's no such thing as a …
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:10 AM
2

It would be nice if, rather than just down voting you into oblivion, someone gave you an answer.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:47 PM
2

Yeah, I know what you mean. I'd never heard of racism or homophobia before I went on reddit.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:36 PM
3

Yes, because women's reproductive rights are never challenged, and we never deal with any harassment, ever. There's no need to continue a long tradition of supporting scholarship, bodily autonomy, and acknowledgement of humanity beyond traditional gender roles because it's for people who are too "fragile" to deal with differing opinions.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:05 PM
0

That doesn't invalidate my point. She said she would probably have her hypothetical son circumcised, not hand him over to a mobile circumcizer with a scalpel and olive oil.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:04 PM
0

Read the footnote.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:59 PM
0

Try actually reading the article But is decreasing one's risk of disease (not a guarantee, just a risk, BTW) really worth traumatizing baby boys and stigmatizing uncircumcised men? But is circumcision even traumatic at all? Has anyone asked a baby? Yes, that was on Jezebel.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:41 PM
0

Feminists usually get upset when it's brought up every time we want to discuss Female Genital mutilation. That doesn't mean feminists would think killing a little kid with "traditional" methods of circumcision is okay.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:52 PM
-9

You can't post stuff like this and then wonder why feminists won't listen to your arguments.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:14 AM
9

Our only option was first-degree or free. (3:47) Sounds like over zealousness on the part of the prosecution.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:08 PM
2

He agreed, the I'm-holding-back-tears-face flashing again before retreating against the well practiced front. He confessed to needing those moments of tenderness and affection like you get when you are a child that are so disparate when you become a man, and that was one of the reasons he kept going back. Yeah... The incident in and of itself isn't unbelievable, and given the nature of the situation it's hard to blame anyone for having a sympathetic response over a skeptical one, but this kind o…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:17 AM
-6

And this is also why this massacre cant be dismissed as just "one lone psycho".
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:55 PM
1

More or less. http://gothamist.com/2011/11/27/lawyer_of_woman_accused_of_nefariou.php
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:02 PM
2

Not just oogled, judged.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter