TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

katana236 Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by katana236 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I became a much better person when I got married and had kids. Far healthier mentally. I don't do drugs or even drink any more. If I had access to easy quality pussy when I was younger. I would have been much healthier mentally. For the same reasons. I just wouldn't feel so useless. And no it's not learned. It's just innate human instincts. We place a gigantic emphasis on our sexuality. As I explained before for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:59 PM
0

And maybe even more importantly, that neither the hookups nor the LTR will solve the loneliness issue - the "hunger" in your analogy. Yes it absolutely will. For some people. That's literally like telling a person who is hungry as fuck "food will not solve all your problems". Technically true but brain dead. It will solve the hungry part for sure. A lot of people are miserable PRECISELY because they don't get affection and are failing to pair up. It's literally the one thing holding them back. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 01:23 PM
1

All these are average statements. "On average" this is how men think and behave. Obviously there is a ton of deviations. Most men have 0 interest to be desired by men for example. But you do. That's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:02 PM
10

Again you seem to think they are all the dorky Steve Urkel types. In reality most guys are just average. They dance average. They'll "hit on" chicks aka flirt with them. And in most cases get nowhere. Because women are often there to just have fun. Guys are the one's there to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 07:26 PM
8

I never said I wish I could do better. I wish that as a young man I could sleep around with a bunch of hot women. I have no interest in that now. I've never met a guy who didn't think that way. We don't say that shit around women. But most of us would love to spend some time hitting random coochie. Especially high quality. Yes most guys even the Chads eventually settle down. Then they talk about how they were never like that and "blah blah blah".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:46 PM
9

I'm not complaining at all. I'm married. I'm explaining why the OP is completely wrong. Most guys would be a lot happier if they could pull high quality tail on a regular basis. At least for some time. It's a major luxury for a lot of guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:22 PM
23

Chad has been getting positive reinforcement from women his whole life. Those socially reclusive losers would be very confident as well. If from childhood every girl blushed when he spoke with her. It's easy to be confident when you have a lot to be confident about. But no I don't necessarily agree either. I've known plenty of lonely dudes who go out to night clubs. Hit on dozens of women. Get rejected over and over and over. Rinse and repeat. This is a very common pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:03 PM
16

I mean that's like telling a person who is starving "hey there is plenty of depressed people who eat a lot". Obviously not exactly the same thing. But yes many men would feel a lot more content with their life if they could just go to a nightclub and bring back a random hottie home. The way Chad can. At some point they may get tired of it and want a real relationship. The same way a lot of Chads do. But if you're in a position where you get zero sexual interest that is rich people problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 03:22 PM
4

Well if he was married twice then what is their evidence that they weren't doing it "for pussy". Or in reality to spread their seed in the most effective and efficient manner. To pair bond with the highest quality female or to impregnate a ton of attractive females. Males are naturally driven towards achievement precisely because it helps them spread their seed. That is an obvious fact. But that doesn't mean there are not outliers who don't think that way at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:19 PM
7

That only proves that some men are not driven by this. Inventors like Nikola Tesla are often very odd people. Perhaps asexual or just wired very differently. Not a good idea to make generalization based on very outlier individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:49 AM
17

A similar question is "Why should we give a shit when women complain about bullshit"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:46 PM
7

Far more importantly women are not biologically programmed to crave casual sex (on average anyway). Due to the aforementioned reasons. Mostly dealing with unwanted pregnancies. The human race did not evolve with child support and contraceptives. Fucking some random asshole could have you stuck for the rest of your life raising his kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:06 PM
1

When I say feminine. I'm talking about sexual dimorphism. A small frame is feminine. But if a guy has a bunch of other masculine features. You're probably not going to think he's a female just because he has a small frame. Sure society has some input on what we consider masculine and feminine. But only some. A lot of it is innate as well. We can tell who is a male and who is a female without thinking about it very quickly just by looking at a persons face. In 99% of cases we can correctly identi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:09 PM
1

It's just a quirk. Like adding a bunch of stuff on your face can make a woman look younger. We call it make up. So is shaving her excess hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:13 PM
0

It's totally normal for men to be cleanly shaved. BUT if they grow out a beard. They will look more masculine. Same dude. One appearance more masculine than another. The same way works backwards. The less hair you have. The more feminine you look. Yes partially because you look younger this way. But it's not like the only thing that changes about you when you go through puberty is the amount of hair. Your entire body including your face goes through a transformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:56 PM
1

Yes but shaving your hair off doesn't suddenly make your face look like you're 13 or the rest of your body. Youth is at a premium. And you're accurately pointing out that shaving all your hair off makes you appear younger. But there are 100 other sexually dimorphic and not sexually dimorphic traits that we can use to gauge how old a person is. A hairy ass 9 year old is still going to look immature as fuck and a fully shaved 80 year old is not going to be confused with a prepubescent child.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:46 PM
-1

Yes having less hair makes you look younger. And yes average men like younger looking women. When I say younger I mean 18-25 range not prepubescent. Most guys are not into that. But if you're 25 and you shave off all your hair. It can make you look closer to 20. Which makes you more attractive. There's a lot more signs than that that tell us whether someone is sexually mature. On average men want a sexually mature partner. But a very fertile one which means youth is also desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:38 PM
1

Yes men prefer younger looking women (sexually mature younger looking women that is). A 25 year old with all her leg hair shaved off on her legs and her underarm and wherever else. Maybe she looks 22 as a result. Which makes her more attractive to an average dude. Some women like feminine traits on a man. It's not a one size fits all. Some women prefer guys with thick ass beards. Some prefer clean shaved. Some like rugged masculine type dudes. Some prefer guys that look like Zayn.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:36 PM
0

How do you figure it's not a sign of femininity? When you yourself acknowledged human females tend to be much less harrier. Shaving it all off is just an exaggeration. But it works because it further cements your feminine status. It's like make up. Obviously it makes you look more feminine. But it largely didn't exist in the past. We didn't evolve to like make up. We evolved to like the things that make up is good at mimicking. It's not always nurture. Sometimes it's good old nature. Males like …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:18 PM
2

Maybe hairless women were always preferred by the average man. But only recently became common place. At least hairless in certain places. A sign of femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:10 PM
6

That's likely the philosophical discussion here. If someone can consent to getting their ass kicked while having sex. How do we then determine whether it was consensual or not when they go to the police and claim abuse? They look identical. You could just say all forms of abuse is bad whether consensual or not shitting on people who are into that kind of stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:25 PM
1

That's just how humans operate. If people would respect moral standards without a need for laws and guys with guns to enforce the law. Then we wouldn't have any law enforcement at all. Most of these discussions are centered around why something happens. Not necessarily whether it's good or bad. It's legal and they are both into it. She wanted him for the clout and the $. And the dude is pretty fucking jacked even at 50 years old. He's still a stud of a physical specimen. That probably turned her…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:56 PM
4

She's over the age of consent. That's all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:53 PM
8

Who the fuck knows. Unless you were in the room with them or there are recordings of the actual events. It's impossible to know for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:38 PM
-2

Never said it was limited to that group. Everything is on average. Gay guys don't find women in the 18-25 range attractive. or any women for that matter. For example, would you also say that "Human males are biologically wired to R* women"? It has been theorized yes. But I haven't heard anyone factually confirm it. And no of course it wouldn't absolve them. Being aggressive and murdering each other is also pretty natural. Also not a good idea to tolerate. We tolerate legally consenting adults ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:23 PM
1

Physical attraction. Obviously. People want to fuck people they are attracted to. At 19 years old she is plenty old enough to consent to sex. Human males are biologically wired to find women at the peak of their fertility the most attractive. Which is usually women in the 18-25 age range. So the correct answer to your question is "he just thought she was hot".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 03:58 PM
3

One could argue they both are. If they enjoy this level of rough sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 03:55 PM
24

Men are not intimidated by successful women. That is the dumbest shit people have made up. Maybe there is a small subset of intellectually insecure dudes who operate this way. But the average guy could give a shit about your career accomplishment one way or another . Having said that. Yes out of this world standards is a problem for both sexes. But since we have very little control over what we find attractive. Lowering your standards is a lot easier said than done. Most people don't have a clue…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:59 PM
0

Most of the time it's some obese woman who has no comprehension of what turns men on. Saying that shit to make herself feel better about the fact that almost nobody wants her. Men are not intimidated by successful women. It's not a thing. Successful women typically want successful men. Which significantly reduces their dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:39 AM
2

My nephew is demisexual. He told me for the longest he just assumed everyone was like him. The idea that I would date someone just because they have a pretty face and that the personality was largely tangential as long as she wasn't intolerable. That never even crossed his mind as a possibility. Even though me and many of my male friends are exactly the same way. What can I say people are different and experience sexuality differently. I suppose if I had a pick of the litter in terms of pretty w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:31 PM
1

I don't know how the average guy does it. But the whole listening to them is usually a chore you have to get through. If I wanted to listen to someone interesting I'd get a male friend. I haven't met too many women capable of talking about interesting stuff and they are usually not attractive. The physical attraction is the end all be all for me. I've observed similar behavior from many other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:51 PM
1

Yeah that's why I said depends on which era we are talking about. Red Pill focuses a lot on human mating instincts that are innate. Those did not develop in the last 150 years. Humans have been around 150-300,000 years. 150 years is nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 10:09 AM
9

Depends which era we are talking about. Lack of contraceptives and access to any medicine. Made the sluts stand out big time. Sure people still fucked around. But being a whore whether for pay or just for fun was a far bigger liability for a woman. When any act of intercourse could lead to pregnancy. When there was no anti biotics or any treatments really. STDs were horrific plagues.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:13 AM
14

Yes but most men are not Chad. And most men could have women they don't have to chase if they start dating bottom dwellers. But that's not very exciting. Most guys have no interest in dumpster diving. Truth is, any woman worth a shit will have several dudes hitting on her. Unless you're way out her league. She will let you make the first move.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:09 PM
–

But I'm being 100% serious. That's genuinely what I prefer. I was never a boob guy anyway. My wife has a fantastic ass. I'm an ass guy. But even with ass "big" is not the priority. The shape matters far more. If she had some huge saggy boobs that would be disgusting compared to her average perky ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:56 PM
–

That depends. If he is 6 foot and chiseled and all that. Would it matter of he was like 3 inches? I'm not that big into "big boobs". So honestly whatever proportions work best for her body type is what I prefer. My wife has medium sized boobs. And I'm perfectly happy with them. They fit her well and they are perky.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:51 PM
–

I think the big disagreement is on the extent. If i see some super cute chick with a pretty face and a nice ass. I don't really care if she has small boobs. Long as they are not saggy. It's very easy for women to make up some boob deficiency and there are plenty of dudes who don't really care one way or another. So yes to some extent it matters. But it's not a very big one. Your weight for example matters far more. Guys who are into the significantly overweight type are far more rare than guys w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:38 PM
–

It's just human nature. Females value exclusivity for the abovementioned provider factor. Just because human females have no problem providing for themselves. Doesn't mean the instinct is gone. Genes adapt much slower than the environment changes. Males value exclusivity because they don't know who the father is. There was no DNA testing in the past. If you let your woman sleep around. You'd be raising Chads children instead of yours. Which was bad for your hereditary line. Any man who allowed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 03:51 PM
1

and they prefer the guy with less muscle? strange. But I see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:50 PM
1

Fascinating chart Whats the difference between 1 and 3?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:45 PM
2

What she is describing is POSSIBLE. I think such a huge change in preference is not very likely. However exposure does have some effect. For instance I moved to Ukraine for 2 years. Prior to that I had a preference for ethnic and black women. After living in Ukraine my preference is squarely white women. Particularly the slavic type. I can only find mixed women attractive now. Where's before I frequently found black women attractive. My theory is that the patterns are innate. But where we find t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:10 PM
2

Older women are just less attractive. The primary function of sex is procreation. After 46 most women are completely infertile. Of course our instincts would have us avoid pairing up with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:01 PM
1

Nonsense lol. I've had very messy houses. And simultaneously had near religious levels of cleanliness (due to OCD). The 2 can easily coexist. The reason my house was a mess was because anytime I'd start cleaning it would take up the whole day. So I just left it the fuck alone. But brushing your teeth and washing your ass doesn't take 14 hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 10:33 PM
2

What? If some asshole invades you, you failed as a leader? What the hell crock of.... is that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:37 PM
3

I never put 2 and 2 together when I was younger. Probably because I grew up in the hood. The guys that got all the girls were often the hardest thugs. Not always the best looking. Now it makes perfect sense because in that environment the hard thugs are the highest status individuals. But back then I didn't even think of it in terms of status. "I guess they got game or something". Some magical "game" that was impossible to quantify or describe. When I look back yes it was obvious. But you need t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:22 PM
7

What makes it hard is that we can't perceive the things that women find attractive as attractive. It's pretty obvious when it's some greek god. Like Tim Tebow or some shit. But sometimes guys you wouldn't really expect to do well. End up doing really well. And we can't really understand what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:02 PM
1

Caring usually just means someone who actually likes you. which is a pretty entry level standard to any relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:00 PM
0

Parity in terms of opportunities. Not physical strength. To some degree women are better suited for todays world. They mature faster. Far more ready to go to college at 18. Which is why they have higher attendance and better grades than men. Men could really use some sort of proto-military between 18-20. They mature slower than women. Not really ready to be adults at 18 in a lot of cases. Just make exceptions for guys who already got in a good college.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:54 PM
16

Capable is a better word in a lot of cases. Women are not nearly as capable as men at fighting wars. Not nearly as capable as men at lifting heavy objects. Or doing anything really that involves a lot of physical labor. Males are much stronger. Yes I agree to some degree it was "allowed". Particularly when it comes to cognitive tasks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:47 PM
8

Because they are not women. It's not actually obvious. For a while society was like "you just need to be confident" or "you just need game" some variation of that line of reasoning. Looks were always massively played down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:41 PM
8

Actually no. They go there to figure out what the fuck is going on. Because they have been sold a bunch of bullshit their entire lives. Some display that as aggression towards women. But most of them just want to know the dynamics and how to improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:37 PM
19

Society moves much faster than genetics can adapt. Males were historically the breadwinners. They held all the high paying positions. In many cases they were the only one's capable of even doing them. For example going to battle. So it was easy for males to seduce a woman with money or status. Now that there is parity between males and females. It has become much harder. The circumstances have changed. But the nature of humans has not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:32 PM
0

The rates of singlehood have increased. For both men and women. I think that has more to do with socially isolated lives. But a rising rate of obesity certainly plays a role as well. Crazy is just intolerable. Which is highly subjective. Simple standards and high standards are not the same thing. My standard could be "10/10 only". That is a fairly simple standard to understand. I will only date women who are out of this world beautiful. But it would also likely be a completely impossible standar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:20 PM
2

Sure I'm not discounting that happens. I just don't see how that counters the whole men are simple creatures. It is a lot easier to understand how to attract a man than a woman. It's just how you look mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:05 PM
-4

Some guy leaving his wife for some older woman doesn't discount the fact that for the most part guys just want an attractive woman who has no kids and is not crazy. Just because some weird outlier wants an older woman and is willing to go through massive trouble to be with her. Doesn't discount that one bit. We don't know what the 45F looked like. We don't know what the 35F looked like. For all we know the 45F was in shape and the 35F was obese. Maybe the 35F was an uncontrollable nightmare to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:55 PM
0

Women don't value looks the same way men do. For a woman attracting a man. Looks are almost the entire ball game. For a man attracting a woman looks are just one piece of the package. If you're very good looking that can be the entire package. But most men are not and have to rely on other things. Fair means diddly squat in the animal kingdom. It's a subconscious innate reaction. "If he pays he must have resources". Gotta remember these instincts come from 1000s if not millions of years of evolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 09:40 PM
1

If you open the date with "your ass is going to pay " all you're doing is shooting yourself in the foot. For no reason. A woman doesn't get evaluated on her $ making abilities or any of that. It's mostly irrelevant to a guy. So the pretty and not crazy is far more important for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:07 PM
0

No a woman needs to look presentable and not act like a psycho. She is being evaluated on her looks and her "not crazy" status. A man gets evaluated for looks and ability/willingness to provide. So by my logic a woman should dress well and behave. A man should look good as well and pay for the meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:20 PM
-1

Guys should always pay. Not paying is just shooting yourself in the foot for no good reason. Your ability and willingness to take care of the woman and any children you conceive is being evaluated on the date. It would be akin to a woman showing up with bad breath or unshaved or some shit. You may find it unfair but that's just mother nature. Mother nature is unfair Guy should always pay for their own good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 02:23 PM
3

Well it's meaningless because guys don't want to fuck other guys. It can be meaningful from women we don't want to fuck. Because chances are if there is unattractive women into you there will also be some attractive women into you. Again the attention from women is so scarce that this is aa legit train of thought. Obviously it's not always accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 02:19 PM
12

Because to men sexual attention is validation. As it is far more scarce and valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 01:10 PM
–

Yeah of course. If you're 17 and have some hot ass 24 year old teacher. Of course you can be attracted to her It's still illegal for her. Which is why the vast majority of women would never do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:51 PM
–

That is why I said otherwise consensual. Meaning he was all for it. But couldn't legally consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:33 PM
–

Totally depends on what it was. Lots of these "sex offenders" did very tame shit. But of course some of it is pretty horrific. If she stuck a dildo up some kindergartener and caused him to become paralyzed as a result. That is very different than say having otherwise consensual sex with some 17 year old boy. Both are sex offenders. But only one is a true monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:30 PM
0

I've been around Chad's who actually could pull it off. Most men can't Even they eventually got some chick pregnant and stayed with her. Sometimes for a few years. Sometimes for good. Humans pair bond. It's innate to us the same way it's innate to a lot of birds. All this "were all just bonobos" garbage is a result of science and political ideology mixing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 04:29 PM
1

Then why the overwhelming pair bonding instincts in males. They would be utterly useless in a bonobo like society. Detrimental even.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 04:12 PM
0

If that was the case. 1) We would still see some societies structured this way. As it stands the only time we see that is perhaps in some off the wall Amazon tribe. Otherwise every single human society is centered around PAIR BONDING not bonobo style random fucking. We are more like Chimps than Bonobos. 2) Speaking of Pair bonding. None of the instincts the human males display would make any sense in your bonobo fantasy. Why would a man get immensely attached to a significant other? If he knows …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 03:56 PM
6

No offense but that's kind of the whole point. The goal is to get people to pair up again and to have children. To improve fertility and to lower the single motherhood percentages. I don't necessarily agree with the method. There are probably much better ways to accomplish it. But you're basically saying "they are accomplishing exactly what they seek to accomplish by getting rid of abortion". I lean pro-choice btw. Even though I am quite conservative in many other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 07:54 PM
5

Some people think that women being picky is a learned behavior. Not innate. That's where the nature vs nurture part comes in.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 04:57 PM
7

Argue about it in what frame? Most of these discussions boil down to nature vs nurture. I love to point out how much easier it is for women to get casual sex because it is an easy example of the difference in innate programming for males and females. I get a ton of push back. People believe it's sociologic and not innate. Even though it's obviously instinctual. For a very simple reason... pregnancy. Women have to be pickier because having sex with a bad mate can mean getting stuck raising their …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 04:42 PM
1

Its long strong and its about to get the freak shit on
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 12:19 AM
-2

Some good dick! Nah but seriously. My wife didn't have financial independence and all that. Which is fine we're both very traditional and believe the man should provide. Which I do. I am fanatically devoted to my wife, and my 2 children. I have no issue sacrificing for them. As previously mentioned I am great in bed. Women love me. 10/10. No woman can resist. And I can be a lot of fun. When I'm not wasting my time arguing with strangers on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 10:05 PM
4

The ability for culture to dampen our natural instincts. Doesn't negate those instincts. You can force yourself to eat less and exercise. And lose weight in the process. Doesn't mean humans don't have hunger or prefer sugary and fatty foods.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:00 PM
5

Ideas and cultures go through their own survival of the fittest trials. Religion has persevered because it was the most practical. When you don't have the means to feed everyone. Much less have law enforcement. It's a lot better to have a gray haired boogeyman in the sky watching everything you do than a free for all. That is why religion was everywhere. Obviously it's not needed now. But it was practical. It takes a lot longer to adjust our primitive instincts. Which is what our sexuality is ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:45 PM
9

Nah it's simple observation. In every country on planet earth. Regardless of religion or whether they have burkas. Men prefer younger (18-25 range), feminine and fit women. Women prefer a taller guy. Women prefer a guy with more money and status. These things are true everywhere. In every country on earth children are primarily raised by their biological parents. In pair bonds. Pair bonds also exist in nature with many other species. More innate biologic behavior Males are always larger, more ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:43 PM
9

No it's understanding that our nature is only malleable to a certain degree. If sexuality evolved in our current environment. It would look completely different. We may live in concrete jungles with abundance of food and safety. But our sexual instincts are still in the real forest with constant starvation and dangerous tribes looking to kill us. The mistake blue pillers make is assigning way too much malleability to the system. If sexuality really was that malleable. We wouldnt have this fertil…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:30 PM
11

Both can easily be true. That we are just animals and that sexuality is largely instinctual. But at the same time you can game the system and significantly improve your lot in life. By understanding the patterns. That's ultimately all they seek to do. To understand the patterns. And to use that information to improve things. Which can absolutely be done. Because we are animals and sexuality is at least 50% innate and instinctual. Culture and society surely play a role. But those are also easy to…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:14 PM
–

We say that. But we don't actually think that. The amount of times I told women what i thought they wanted to hear.... You guys want your career and all that to matter. It does not. But we know you want it to. And most of the time there's no down side from gaslighting you. To either of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 06:42 PM
5

Maybe 1/10000. The rest are just happy to have a relationship and could give a rats ass about some made up revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:16 PM
–

Like the OP said. You can survive living out in the streets without housing. But your life is going to suck. The same goes for a life without a significant other and physical affection. Yes only the standard of living falls apart. Which is why ultimately this is just a semantic argument. If a need is strictly things you can't survive without. Clothes, freedom (opposite of slavery), medicine and many other things are technically not needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 10:11 PM
–

Sex being a need nullifies a lot of stupid arguments. Like for example "there is more to life than sex". Or "you need to learn to be happy on your own". All of these stem from the idea that sex is just a thing and that the only reason people care about it is because they fixate on it. The truth is very different. We are biologically wired to put a tremendous amount of emphasis on sex and procreation. You can't just turn it off at will. Anymore than you can turn off hunger or thirst.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 04:13 PM
0

No The attraction switches for males and females differ Males don't really change as they age. They always want a hot chick. Females start out similar to males. But as they age their attraction switches start to favor men with status and money. Doesn't mean some ugly fucker can get 10s if he's wealthy. But an average looking dude can do very well if he's paid But simping behavior isn't really flashing wealth. It's more like begging for attention. Which is never attractive. A high status male won…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 08:21 PM
1

It's not dual mating strategy. It's how anyone acts when they feel their partner is of higher quality than them. We see this with love sick friend zoned males as well. If they start dating someone on their level they might not show that level of fanatical devotion either. In either case the woman wants a relationship. She's just willing to risk pregnancy and other problems for the Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 04:14 PM
7

I can't. You can feel however you want. But if you make stupid decisions based on emotions than logic. I have the right to point it out. As others have said in this thread. Most women answering bear would actually shit their pants if they had to encounter a real bear. They only answer that from the safety of their current position. Most of them are not that stupid and don't actually mean it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:50 PM
5

Still shows how ignorant people can be of statistics. And how emotional women are in their choices. Bear is obviously much more dangerous. But if we're letting emotions make choices for us than anything goes. Why not book a vacation in some war zone because you heard the flowers bloom really pretty that time of the year.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:45 PM
46

I think women have always selected for looks, money and status. Difference is now women have their own money and status wise they tend to be even with most men. The standard has always been "be better than me somehow or at the very least be on my level". That was much easier to accomplish when women weren't making shit. However that doesn't mean that being a standard woman is somehow bad. We just need to acknowledge the mess it makes in the dating market and think of good ways we can fix some of…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:53 PM
1

https://www.statista.com/statistics/241530/birth-rate-by-family-income-in-the-us/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:23 PM
1

Yes but those taxes would not make anyone better off. Most of the problems you list are due to government fucking things up. You don't fix government fuck ups by giving the government more $ and more power. Take housing. Why is it so fucked up? Burdensome zoning regulations. Lack of investment into real estate development due to you guessed it burdensome regulations. The issue is supply. We need more greed not less lol. We already have very progressive tax brackets. And no the middle class is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:27 PM
1

All humans are greedy. It's what drives the economy. You want the lowest rent possible. They want to charge the most possible. Everyone is behaving exactly the same way. Regulating prices involves price controls. Price controls remove efficiency from an economy. That was to a extreme extent what USSR did. They price controlled absolutely everything and the economy was a pathetic mess as a result. Any price control is bad though. Only a small % of people are actually struggling. The middle and up…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:21 PM
1

Greed is a very powerful tool to build wealth. The last thing we want to do is regulate it. USSR tried to regulate it. Ended up with a pathetic mess of an economy. And no landlords can't increase rent specifically on new parents. That would be illegal as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:33 PM
3

I'm biased in that regard. Me and my wife have 1 kid. We're trying for 2nd now. If we had better financial capabilities. We'd likely have 3 by now. Another couple we used to hang out with is about to have their 3rd. Their first was born within a couple of months of our first one. I spent like I dunno $60,000 on income taxes last 3 years. Yeah it would have made a difference. We'd probably be talking about a 3rd at least. But you may be right. The proportions of people like me may not be as big a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:37 PM
-1

Well Romania was a socialist hellhole. But I don't think banning contraceptives is a real solution in the West either. Would be political suicide and likely cause some serious uprisings.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:25 PM
-2

Interesting Well within the realm of possible solutions. Sounds like mine is still the most feasible. I think it's an economic issue in SOME CASES. but also your point about propaganda and saying that anyone without 2 kids is a weirdo.... that probably has a lot to do with it. We have this very unhealthy "hey you don't need kids or a family to be hapoy" attitude in society. Good stuff. Plenty to think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:24 PM
1

You get 3 years of no income taxes for every kid. Stacking. Meaning if you have 2 back to back you get 6 total years.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:03 PM
0

What's the alternative? Making contraceptives illegal? I don't think Hungary is a fair comparison to US. They don't have such a large and prosperous middle and upper class. They stand to gain far more from completely not having to pay income taxes. What would you propose?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:02 PM
1

Only for 3 years per child. It's not really that much for a lot of families. You would see a small hike in all the brackets. But not that big. Its a very good long term investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:56 PM
0

Taxes get raised all the time This would be a "improve the fertility rate of the most productive citizens" initiative. Would probably be wildly popular with conservatives and make a bunch of leftists absolutely irate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:44 PM
1

Raise taxes on everyone else of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:41 PM
0

I don't think it's particularly productive. People should really learn that some places are just shitholes filled with bad people. The best thing to do with bad people is to avoid them. Unless you plan on being a policeman. You don't have the power to do anything about it. Public ridicule and mockery really don't work. They don't give a shit about being mocked. They are fucking drunk idiots surrounded by other drunk idiots. Do you think drunk idiots care about your opinion. You can pass laws aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:40 PM
0

No I mean the rates would slightly go up for everyone else that's not part of the exemption. As in if the rate is 30% now. It would be 31% to make up the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:31 PM
1

Well...how much was Hungary actually offering? Cause you know you take a doctor couple bringing in 1mil a year and sending uncle Sam 400k a year in income taxes. 3 years with no income taxes becomes a very juicy offer. Something tells me Hungary didn't go nearly as far Would it FIX the issue? Probably not. But it would improve things a lot. Increase fertility where it is most needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:30 PM
0

Nahhhh It wouldn't even be that expensive. You could easily hike the taxes up on everyone else to make up the difference. It's worth it in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:11 PM
0

Like I said. I wouldn't want to hang around a bunch of drunk men with my wife. Especially since I don't drink no more. But you do you... just expect some of the guys to behave like total dumbasses. That's part of the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:07 PM
0

If you don't like mosquitos. Don't go to the swamp at night. If the swamp is worth it to you. Then expect mosquitos. I personally don't have any reason to visit the swamp at night or go to any concert. But hey you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:54 PM
-1

Yes if they don't want to deal with drunk idiots. I don't know how you can enjoy that shit with your significant other in the first place. I wouldn't be found dead in those shit holes if it wasn't a way to meet women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:53 PM
3

No I'm serious If you're fine dealing with a bunch of idiots. If the venue is worth it to you. Than by all means. The OP was complaining about bad behavior from men. It clearly bothers them. If the mosquitos bothers you don't go to the swamp at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:51 PM
2

Yes but in tax relief not direct payments The more you make the bigger the relief
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:37 PM
1

Yeah good luck passing that law. The establishments would run out of business. Nor would anyone really support that initiative to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:25 PM
4

The solution in US would be years without having to pay income taxes. This would encourage the most productive members of society to have more kids. For a doctor couple that could mean millions of dollars in savings. Say 3 years of no income tax per kid. And they can stack. Meaning have 2 kids back to back means 6 years of no income taxes. Poor people already have high fertility rates. Upper and middle class is where we need the most improvement. Long term would be good to go back to "family is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:24 PM
-3

This is why couples should never go to such places. You're asking for trouble. Much better to stay home and watch a movie or something. Than to subject yourself to that trash. This is just how drunk men behave. They are not there for the music. They are there to get laid. Edit: SOME drunk men. But you get a big enough gathering and you're bound to run into them
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:05 PM
–

You're gaining a new family. Something arguably more valuable than all the other things you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:05 PM
–

Passport bro wasn't even a popular theme back when I did it. It's caught on since then. Not like I was championing it or anything. It's simple arbitrage. Women favor men who have good status and $. Moving to a less developed nation accomplishes a huge improvement in dating prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:53 PM
–

I did though:) In fact the quality of the pickings was absolutely night and day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:06 PM
–

I did that for many years in my local area. The quality of what is available was very bad to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:00 PM
1

Is it really though? Family life is the most important thing in our existence. You spend way more time with your spouse and kids than anyone else. Especially your spouse. And especially in the modern times where most people don't even have that many close friends. What difference does it make what corner of the globe you play Dota 2 every day long as the internet is good. It's not just "for pussy". It's to have a family. To have a wife you actually want to wake up next to. That's worth way more …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:46 PM
2

That's not really that extreme. Life is boring without a family. If that's what you gotta do to wake up to someone you actually want to wake up to every morning. It's more than worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter