TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kateastrophic Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by kateastrophic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

But this is Leiper's Fork, which has become the most sought-after real estate for wealthy farms. Lots of celebrities live out there (Nicole Kidman/Keith Urban at one point, Justin Timberlake/Jessica Biel, and a slew of big musicians), so you can expect it to be expensive even if it's rural.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 04:56 AM
21

Your example is their old house! That they still own and can't sell-- it was originally on the market for $7.9million. Her new house is on 88 acres, so that is clearly a large part of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 04:46 AM
2

How much money does he make? At 20K a month, I imagine that child has an expensive lifestyle--do they attend private school? How much is his/her school tuition? Is the father legally responsible for college tuition, or is the mother saving for it? If it's a public school, does the mother pay a high mortgage to keep him or her in the district? Is the child driving age? Is there a second car payment? Expensive hobbies? Horse-riding, sports equipment, etc.? Or a nanny? And the kids of millionaires …
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:30 AM
2

I don't have a problem with fb posts being allowed as evidence, but I still don't think this particular post amounts to anything. If she said she had already purchased the shoes, maybe-- because I'll grant you this post does not paint a picture of a woman who has enough discretionary income to buy $600 shoes-- but otherwise, if this is the only "proof" the dad has of financial mismanagement, then he is tying up the courts and accruing legal costs for no reason.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:50 PM
2

The idea that food stamps give families too much money is ridiculous. If a recipient did buy expensive steaks (and caviar? Your grocery store is fancier than mine), he or she would starve for the rest of the month. Most food programs do stipulate what foods can be bought, but even if yours doesn't, it wouldn't cover luxury meals every day.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:32 PM
3

I don't think a woman's lifestyle should be elevated above a man's post-divorce, but if the couple jointly decided that she should end her working career to raise the kids, she is no longer at the pay scale and job level she would have been (and he is). Also, you list a 50/50 custody example, but that is rarely the case. So if he makes considerably more money, and she has had to re-enter the job market at a lower level than she would otherwise be, and she has custody (and therefore covering expe…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:25 PM
2

I agree with what you are saying about the system being broken as a whole, but this is hardly evidence. There is no proof that she even actually bought the shoes, much less that she bought them instead of covering the child's expenses. A $600 receipt for shoes and an overdue electricity bill are evidence, this is just a waste of the legal system's time.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:06 PM
3

I disagree. A question mark clearly indicates a question, even if it was poorly phrased. It was obvious to me what question he was asking, and I doubt you are so thick that you did not understand it as well.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:54 PM
3

She may have already spent $1200 or more on supporting the child that month. Your argument that the woman should have no discretionary income so that the man can more discretionary income holds no water. You don't know what she has already paid for, or how much discretionary income he has, or if she was the slightest bit serious about a FB post, so don't make assumptions.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:43 PM
7

I highly doubt she bought the shoes. She's probably fantasizing. I have made fb posts swearing I would take exotic vacations, but in the end I pay my bills instead. I have no doubt that plenty of women don't spend child support properly (and plenty of men don't pay their fair share), but this is not proof of that.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:36 PM
5

A. Buying shoes is not a crime. Only if she said she was going to neglect her child's necessities to buy them, would it possibly be a crime. B. Even if shoe-shopping was a crime, there is no evidence she did actually buy the shoes. Saying "I'm going to stab somebody" on fb but without a body does not make the person guilty of anything.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:31 PM
5

So if the mother is capable of covering the child's costs, the father shouldn't have to contribute? So the father should be able to keep 100% of his money for himself if the mother is able to keep even 10% of hers for herself? I have no problem with your food stamp idea, but it would be unfair in cases of late payments, where the mother has already paid with her cash (and possibly over-extended herself). Better, I think, to have documentation of food, housing, clothing, school supplies, extracur…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter