| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Assertions about Misogyny should be substantiated in this subreddit (not wild claims about 1% or less of posts). Being for Men's Rights is NOT misogyny.First of all, the second example is as ridiculous as the first. It doesn't make the first one correct or better. It makes them both wrong. Secondly, being a woman didn't cause her to be manipulative. Being a vicious person did. By implying that being female causes those problems, you're implying that all women will, eventually, be vicious and manipulative. That, in fact, I cannot help but want to lie to men for manipulative means. Being a female will make me. I know this to be false. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 10:26 PM |
| 5 | Mother who cried rape after meeting man on dating website is jailed for two yearsWithholding the names of accused until such time as conviction or release on parole would go a long way for avoiding innocent men being found guilty by media/community. Sorry for what happened to you. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 08:08 PM |
| 2 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.The problem is that feminism has different definitions according to different people. Many scholarly programs and moderates define feminism as having an interest and fighting for the rights of women to have the same choices and opportunities as men. Radicals (the name of the branch that a lot of you dislike) can go so far sometimes as to say that heterosexual sex is an expression of male hatred of women. Sex positive (that is one label) feminists think this is patiently silly. There are liberal … | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 06:34 PM |
| 5 | Assertions about Misogyny should be substantiated in this subreddit (not wild claims about 1% or less of posts). Being for Men's Rights is NOT misogyny.Yeah, see, "that was bitchy/stupid/wrong" is...fair and productive if wrongdoing is occurring. It often is. "Come to think of it. Nothing at all could possibly surprise when it comes to women and deception. It defines their whole gender. Just look at their obsession with fashion and make up and shit. Deception comes as naturally to women as pissing standing up comes to men." That is decided less cool. It's a blanket statement that assumes the worthlessness of every member of the female gender. N… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 05:20 PM |
| 2 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.sigh I really wish women would quit it with those types of comments. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 04:32 PM |
| 9 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.The draft is something I have an ethical opposition to for both genders, but if we have one, both genders should be up for conscription. Women should also serve in combat units. Britain seems to be considering this direction. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-05-24-uk-troops_N.htm They're reviewing their policies to allow women to fight on the front lines. It's about time. Now, can everyone else catch up? Circumcision on children and babies is mutilation without consent, IMHO. No body shou… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 07:28 AM |
| 13 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.And if you do believe in equality and fairness, and the word "feminist" has negative connotations to a lot of people here, why not self-identify as an equalist or an egalitarian? I do identify as an egalitarian, but that has a different meaning than feminism does. Feminism is an area of study focused on issues relating to and revolving around women. Egalitarianism touches on those things, but has a much more expansive and broader meaning. Feminism has roots going back for years that are worth pa… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 06:54 AM |
| 13 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.All I have to go on here is the way I see the men here speak to women when they're not agreeing with them, or about them when they're not posting comments. Both of these, from what I've seen, are discouraging. The comments and slants on stories make me feel hated by people who loudly proclaim to know what I want because I'm a feminist, while having no idea about what I actually believe in. And, because I've seen it happen to others, I fear that even if I say that I do believe in actual equal foo… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 05:53 AM |
| 1 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.That depends on where you study. Some programs are, while others are already focused on male gender role/legal issues and how they damage the men constrained by them. While I understand how you could come by this view if you have not been exposed to multiple gender studies programs, I do wish that you'd entertain the possibility for expansion in this area. I'd much rather have one area of study that unifies the theories than two that are forever pointing the finger at each other or hurling insul… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 05:01 AM |
| 13 | We've got to change the dialogue if we want to gain traction as a movement.I have to admit, as a female and a feminist that has recently unsubscribed from this subreddit, these points would have gone a long way in keeping me around and participating in the discussions. I firmly believe that men get a raw deal in many ways -- the legal ones being particularly disturbing. I don't hate men. I see a lot of areas where feminist ideology and men's rights issues align (women that don't want primary care of children and men that do, or wanting more accurate reporting and convi… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/09 04:13 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter