TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kd7uiy Archive

View 4 posts and 46 comments by kd7uiy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not terribly more than any other brand new vehicle. It was a far larger jump to add my teenage kid to the insurance policy...
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:27 PM
1

So in your circumstance, if you drive more than 2,000 km/ month, a Model 3 might be cheaper.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:21 PM
1

I haven't looked for a while, but the math I did went something like this: I drive about 20,000 miles per year. The car I had before got about 28 miles per gallon The cost of gas is about $2.50/ gallon, although it varies for a while. The cost of electricity is about $0.10/ kW-hr The Model 3 gets about 230 W/ mi. Thus the cost of gas for me was roughly $0.10/ mile, and about $0.02/mile for the model 3. It's a bit rough, I wish they allowed for putting in more factors to the Tesla website, but...
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:10 PM
3

Before I bought a Model 3, I was spending at least $200 a month in gas. I now pay about $50 in electricity. Just considering the gas savings goes a long ways towards helping even things out there.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:34 PM
2

The cost of ownership of a Tesla Model 3 for many people is actually lower than an entry level Honda Civic or something, depending on your ability to charge at home, how much gas costs, and how much you drive. For me, it will break even eventually, but...
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:52 PM
5

I own a Model 3, BTW. And my wife isn't a huge fan of my car, because of the power. But I'm an engineer, and she is an analog artist, so the tech level interests are a bit different...
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:51 PM
7

That could be it. If that is the case, then when the Tesla Model Y becomes available, that ratio might change drastically.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:12 PM
26

Tesla buyers have the same gender ratio as most EVs. It is very much skewed male, however. Bottom line, EVs in general seem to appeal more to men for some reason. That is something Tesla might consider working on, but it isn't Tesla as a company that skews that way, just the vehicles they sell tend to lean towards more male buyers. If you want to see a much better, more balanced breakdown of this, see https://electrek.co/2019/07/08/tesla-women-electric/
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:00 PM
7

It's been a while since I looked, but the site so far as I can tell primarily exists to help men be better at convincing women to have one night stands. It wasn't quarantined in those days... But I've largely blotted it out, like I said, not the kind of thing I want to be involved with. Note I could be totally off on this, but a considerable amount of the discussion seems to be pointed in the direction of helping men achieve casual sex.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:46 PM
18

I had thought at first /r/theredpill was an MRA subreddit, and wanted nothing to do with the community. I'm glad I eventually found this one...
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:08 PM
1

No worries!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:24 PM
3

I agree, I guess my point was the draft is pointless, it shouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:42 PM
5

There aren't many countries that the US could be at war with that would force a draft these days. And I think all of them are nuclear powers, or our allies. I can't think of a country where a draft would even be useful. Still...
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:02 PM
1

I started to write something on another post, and did some research in to this, including reading most of the paper she wrote, and I can say this pretty objectively. First of all, it was a large team effort. It isn't fair to said she singlehandedly did it, with so many people involved. As to what her role is, she produced the formula and approach that made the final step possible. You can take a look at her paper at https://dspace.mit.edu/openaccess-disseminate/1721.1/103077 . Look particularly …
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:06 PM
2

I mean, he basically said that while women have it hard in some ways, men have it hard in many ways too, like more jail time for the same crime, more workplace deaths, and more likely to have their kids taken away no matter what, themes that are very familiar to anyone who hangs out here.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:02 PM
31

I mean, if they want to do a government study that will show the pay differences between men and women in the government for the same position are negligible... Will kind of defeat the point of the study I suspect, but...
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:09 AM
6

Class G, which should require 8-31 months in prison. See https://www.ageofconsent.net/laws/north-carolina/intercourse-and-sexual-offenses-with-certain-victims .
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:51 PM
83

He still might be able to do it. Talking with a lawyer might be helpful in such circumstances...
/r/MensRights31/10/18 12:17 PM
1

Is there another option to take the class? If they were offering multiple options for taking the class, and one of them was female only it might be okay, but to prohibit men entirely is a bit crazy...
/r/MensRights12/07/18 01:39 PM
4

Safe Haven is a minimal cost really. There are large waiting lists for adoptions, I would presume that any baby dropped off at a safe haven will find a home that isn't being paid for by the state relatively quickly.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 11:42 AM
11

What exactly did you actually post?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:14 PM
1

The problem often becomes if, say, one is 18 and the other is 17. That clearly has a person who could be prosecuted, but 1 year difference?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 05:13 PM
1

For the record, Romeo and Juliet laws don't apply in every state, and aren't applied the same way state to state. https://www.nedbarnett.com/states-romeo-juliet-laws/
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:00 PM
1

Of anyone talking about the pay gap today, this is the one that seems to be at least discussing the core issues, rather then just blaming things on outright sexism. If there is any sexism against women, it is of the variety discussed in this article. Assigning traditional gender roles from an early age, and having the consequences of those affect things years later. It isn't that men have it out for women, it is rather that choices that are encouraged from a young age have consequences far later…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:17 PM
-1

Correction, they haven't been forbidden from these jobs for a long time. Arguably they were forbidden, at least to some extend, in the 50s-60s, and even more so earlier then that. But the discriminatory practices of years ago have been eroded to the point that they don't really exist anymore.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:11 PM
1

The article is biased, but it is at least using facts. You are right that women are being pushed in to such jobs. But the truth is, go to any school's Engineering department and look at the number of women. They just aren't there. It isn't discrimination, they just don't choose to study in those fields.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:02 PM
1

This article I feel gets it. You do harder jobs, starting earlier in life, and you are more likely to get ahead in life. It isn't about your gender, it is about what you do in your life, and what kind of job you take. The only gripe I have with the article is "girls are told they're good with people, so they're hired as hostesses at restaurants or as customer-facing positions in retail. These jobs have high "aesthetic labor" requirements — meaning girls could have more negative experiences with …
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:52 PM
1

I won't disagree with that statement. It's really interesting to think of what should qualify a person to be paid more...
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:02 PM
0

I would argue that people who have more knowledge, do things more dangerous, work longer hours, take more risks, have the ability to directly earn money, or have more societal benefit should earn more. This, however, doesn't well reflect how well many jobs are paid. If people focus more on the core issue, why certain professions that require knowledge, long hours, can be dangerous, and have societal benefit aren't paid as much as they should be, then their arguments will go much further then bla…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:56 PM
1

In fairness, I would say that Nursing is probably a more dangerous job then an engineer, and engineers tend to get paid a lot more.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:01 PM
0

The key to this is in one sentence in the middle. The rest is pretty much dispelled. Much of the gender wage gap can be explained by factors like "occupational segregation" (when work in female-dominated fields is valued less than work in male-dominated fields) and women's traditional roles as unpaid caretakers and caregivers, according to the Pew Research Center. I can stand behind that one sentence. I think especially the key is the latter half, where women in traditional roles as unpaid caret…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:36 PM
13

His name is not on the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:21 PM
3

One man I spoke to, an international relations PhD student, said: "I do not recognise gender studies as being a very important discipline. I do think women's rights are important. But I think in courses like these they are too critical of what they call male-dominated reality." If they were more worthwhile, this probably wouldn't be the case. But this quote seems to put the nail in the coffin.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 01:34 PM
22

The problem is he identified wrongly where the sexism occurred. The sexism wasn't that he was being objectified, the sexism came in that he was objectified (Which he didn't deny in his apology), and that society couldn't accept that he had been objectified. I think his apology reflected that, more or less.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:03 PM
7

It seems that forgery/ fraud can be a very difficult case to make, see https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/746lh0/ex_committed_id_theft_fraud_embezzlemnt_5_years/ . For the record, this was a female victim of her husband (5 years into the process for divorce). I'm not saying this isn't horrible, but it does seem like it can go both ways.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 01:45 PM
1

I knew this seemed too outrageous to be real. Thanks for doing the leg work. The article front loading what it did was wrong, they should have included a more general description...
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:09 AM
13

Not a native speaker, but I do speak it pretty fluently. There was an odd word off here and there, particularly mixing the gender at the beginning, but overall it is pretty close. The second sentence in the opening statement is better translated "For 11 years he has refused to have sexual relations with his partner, which constitutes "physical and psychological maltreatment.". As a side note, I'm not at all surprised Google Translate made that error, it took me a minute looking at it to realize …
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:28 PM
2

Yeah, that sounds about right. Still...
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:45 AM
2

So far as I can tell, it's based on a survey that they conducted themselves. I believe it is a source. EDIT The 2013 report says how they get the information. It's based on the profiles that they have in their collection. http://www.payscale.com/career-news/2013/04/fallacy-of-the-gender-wage-gap "We collect data on over 250 compensable factors in our more than 35 million profiles"
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:03 PM
8

I'm suspecting that might be in the compensated view? It's hard to say.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:37 PM
65

http://www.payscale.com/data-packages/gender-pay-gap is the best source, particularly the "Controlled" version of Industries With The Largest Gender Pay Gaps. Everything I've seen shows if there is a pay gap, it's something closer to 5%, when all factors are taken in to account.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:00 PM
3

From the research I've done on this, single gender classrooms can work really well, if the teachers take the time to learn about the differences. There are scientific studies on the ways that a typical boy learns differently than a typical girl. For instance, boys tend to learn the kinematic part of physics better than girls, while girls tend to learn the "whys" in physics better. I have long been an advocate for treating genders "Equal, but not the same", and this is another instance of where i…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:53 PM
2

I'm increasingly for the idea of every bathroom being a room with floor to ceiling stalls, no gaps, and having no gendered bathrooms. The sinks can be shared. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:49 PM
4

Alternatively, just make the woman's bathroom larger than the men's? Having, say, 5 women's stalls compared to 2 urinals and a stall in the men's room might be just about right?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:48 PM
1

It's a really hard situation, and it's easy to play Monday morning quarterback without knowing all of the details. I just hope this guy has a chance to be the father of this child if the mother is out of the picture, if he desires it.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:00 PM
1

My hope would be that she would go in to foster care, and the person who believed he was her father could actually be her foster father (Assuming that is what he desires), as it seems evident from the story that he was a good father figure, and cares for the child, even if it isn't his. It's even possible, if he wants it, that he could become the adoptive father, which could be for the betterment of both him and the child.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter