| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"? | keepgettingdoxxed | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:00 PM | |
| 40 | David Leyonhjelm is dead on the money | Social Issues | keepgettingdoxxed | /r/MensRights | 04/07/18 10:45 PM |
| 31 | Article from ABC about financial hardship during divorce only looks at the female perspective | Marriage/Children | keepgettingdoxxed | /r/MensRights | 08/08/18 11:21 PM |
| 2 | Gender Pay Gap | Edu./Occu. | keepgettingdoxxed | /r/MensRights | 26/04/18 10:54 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Group of women would often sex bait/dope drunk men at bars in a robbing scheme in Brazil. (Source in Portuguese)This isn't mens rights. This is shitty people being shitty. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/18 03:02 AM |
| 1 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenAnd I'll agree with you when/if that happens. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/18 12:46 AM |
| 1 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenThat's not saying anything. Wait until she's sentenced before you start claiming it's sexist. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/18 11:11 PM |
| 1 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.I agree with you there. We're not in the courtroom, so we don't know the mitigating factors. But the reporting on this case has repeatedly referred to the reasons for the lenient sentence. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/18 07:41 AM |
| 1 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.No, it's total bullshit. Thankfully this country still has some people with sense who are calling this out. Every time you see this come up on /r/mensrights, it would be good to link to this as an example of something that can be done. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/18 03:36 AM |
| 1 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenThen talk about those precedents when they occur in this case. Right now you make everyone see /r/menrights as a bunch of desperate shit posts trying to claim that women suck. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/18 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenUntil that happens this is just a bunch of men acting like little fucking feminists. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/18 09:44 PM |
| 1 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.Here you go. People are appealing to the DPP. http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-11/school-staff-member-sentence-for-sex-with-students-inadequate/10225696 | /r/MensRights | 10/09/18 09:42 PM |
| 1 | NAAP – The National Association Of Alienated Parents - a group of parents who have been alienated from their children either inside or outside of the court processLet's fight alienation with alienation? | /r/MensRights | 09/09/18 10:15 PM |
| 15 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenUntil this woman is not punished identically to a man who committed the same crime under the same circumstances, this is not a mens rights issue. This is a shitty person. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/18 10:09 PM |
| 1 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.No I think you contact the attourney general of the state in question. The attourney general can appeal sentencing. It's happening right now in queensland for that bloke who gut-punched a little boy. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/18 09:42 PM |
| 1 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.Maybe it's the court that you write to? There is definitely an avenue that citizens can use in Australia to question the sentencing of the court. It's usually referred to as not meeting the communities expectations. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/18 03:12 AM |
| 3 | Female teaching aide grooms 15 year old boy for sex; blames weight-loss drug, Duromine (phentermine); gets suspended sentence.Someone provide me an australia example with the opposite genders and a harsher sentence for the same circumstance. You can write to your MP about the lack of justice and they can revisit the sentence. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/18 09:59 PM |
| 1 | Pints for ProstatesMaybe drinking more pints will cure you of your prostate cancer. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/18 06:19 AM |
| 2 | Abolish Spousal Support all together. It’s time to ask why it exist at all. No one under 50 has ever made traditional sacrifices in a childless relationship anymore. And even with kids most couples still work and share responsibility.Yeah seriously. People made informed decisions. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/18 12:07 AM |
| 1 | Pints for ProstatesOr maybe don't support alcohol companies. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/18 10:58 PM |
| 1 | Pints for ProstatesHoly fuck. Alcohol is the leading cause of bowl cancer. Why would you promote this? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/18 10:34 AM |
| 8 | Video of a woman verbally abusing man on the street, then slams his phone on the ground. Imagine this was a man doing this to a woman.This isn't a Mens Rights issue. This is a person being an asshole, happens all the time. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/18 10:02 PM |
| 0 | "Sarah Hanson-Young accuses David Leyonhjelm of sexist slur during debate on women's safety." Left out of the headline is that HE accuses her of saying all men are rapists. That's the REAL story.LNP doesnt control the ABC editorial team. And I didnt say sell it for a quick buck | /r/MensRights | 29/06/18 07:41 AM |
| 0 | "Sarah Hanson-Young accuses David Leyonhjelm of sexist slur during debate on women's safety." Left out of the headline is that HE accuses her of saying all men are rapists. That's the REAL story.They've been doing it for years. Former head of channel 10 runs the joint. It's beyond saving, burn it. And I'd appreciate you not calling a sexist, racist and left wing leaning institution like the ABC a "National Treasure". The snowy hydro is a national treasure, an institution is fleeting. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/18 07:23 AM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?What maculinity "encourages non consential tendencies"? You are speaking through your ass. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 09:57 PM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?So which discrete surroundings are teaching which men to rape? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 11:10 AM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?So which men does society teach to rape? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 08:55 AM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?I've already quoted you where you said that objectification happens when someone is raped. So. You have failed to show me why objectification is bad. Your original argument was that men are taughy by society to objectify women. You have agreed on what I've said capitalism produces in regard to objectification. Therefore we are all objectified, all the time. Now you have surrendered by saying that all relations should be consensual. I don't think anyone here, or anyone anywhere disagrees with tha… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 08:09 AM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?Okay, so changing your definition as you go aside, you now say objectification is treating someone like an object. Isn't that just capitalism though? They are workers from which to extract labor. The market treats us as wallets from which to extract money. So. Objectification is therefore treating an unknown person like the utility they provide you. Workers are labour, spenders are wallets. Chicks on billboards as sex. That is their utility. I need to understand why you think treating people lik… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 07:32 AM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?and no objectification is not rape You sure? By objectification i mean rendering another indivudals integrity and person to have equal value as an object through either physical (rape/doing stuf to that person without their consent) or emotional action. So let's go back. What is objecification? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/18 10:16 PM |
| 1 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?So objectification is rape? It is a discrete action which is objectification? Which of these social norms do you think are telling men to rape women. Because you are full of shit, I will shortcut this. If objectification was an actual thing, if it was a bad thing if it exists, if social norms tell men to do this, every woman would have been raped 10x by the age of 25. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/18 09:36 PM |
| -2 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?Show me your tits. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/18 12:06 PM |
| 2 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?I think you need to explain what "objectification" is and then explain why it's a problem, and how you think it can then be avoided. In all seriousness. I haven't yet come across someone who can explain it beyond "it's bad, mkay". | /r/MensRights | 21/06/18 12:06 PM |
| 3 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?I try to be measured in response to these arguments. But inevitably, everyone gets riled up and starts shouting "victim blaming". They hold these vigils in the park, and they post on facebook. And I ask, "what does this achieve?". I then am looked at as though I'm some sort of rapist myself. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:58 PM |
| 29 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?This is a perfect example. This is going to be the analogy that I use because it illustrates the point so well. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:49 PM |
| 2 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?Yeah. Now, let's say you do go anyway. And you are mugged and raped. Is it cool for me to say "you shouldn't have been there?". I'm guessing no, that's not cool, and I can see how it's victim blaming. But I can use you as an example to others. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:40 PM |
| 3 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?Yes. But I'm not saying it in an accusatory way. What I mean is, I guess the best thing to do about rapists is tell people to not be in harms way. If that means reminding people not to be crossing soccer fields at night by themselves, then I guess that's it. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:30 PM |
| 2 | How to argue "teach men not to rape"?I guess then "victim blaming" is a good response then. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 11:17 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'And everyone go back and look at those threads and what they were about. Trivial "men's rights" issues that water down actual problems. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'You didn't fight in the war so you shouldn't play a game infantalising it. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'You want to be able to kill women as much as you kill men in game. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Care to dispute my comment or just ignore it? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 01:17 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Your standard isn't fair. Your standard is exclusionary for no reason. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 01:17 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'No. What's disrespectful to the millions of people; men, women and children, who died in the war, is turning into an entertainment product. Don't try to say that this is some kind of sacred thing that's been desecrated by the inclusion of a single woman. It's a video game. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 12:51 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Inclusion is not inheritly anti-male. This is /r/MensRights and your issues with a game including people other than men, is not a mens rights issue. Women were involved in the war effort. The woman in the game is presented as a resistance fighter, of which there were many documented examples. Adding this in, is not anti-male. Get a grip. Not everything is an attack on your identity. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/18 12:08 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'So the problem is that your fantasy game isn't realistic enough? | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 11:33 PM |
| 0 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'There were men involved in womens suffrage. And do you really want to make mens rights into "well if we did this everyone would be upset"? We don't need to react to a game featuring a woman. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 11:14 PM |
| 0 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'They did fight. Learn your history instead of the "history" you learned in Hollywood school. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 11:12 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'What's your point? You want women to kill in the game or you don't want men to kill in the game? | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 09:47 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Generally. Yet there were some. No one is making you play the game or making you play a female character. Why are you so against giving women the opportunity to make-believe soldier like you are? | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 08:28 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'It's not. You could be accused of trying to reduce the significance women played in combat | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 08:15 AM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'About the game?! I think you mean the war. And it's not your war. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:28 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Says who? You? The holder of the WW2 copyright? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:26 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Super constructive! | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:25 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Then don't play this terribly ahistorical game. Or be honest. Your gripe has nothing to do with historical accuracy. You wouldn't be playing a mainstream videogame otherwise. No, your complaint is that there are women characters in your bullshit hollywood invented grunt-fest of WW2. Women play Battlefield. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:07 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Read the comments in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'You don't have some sort of right to have games made personally for you. Jesus fuck how entitled are you? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'They never claimed historical accuracy. And if that's your gripe, go play Hearts Of Iron. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'You obviously don't know Battlefield. If someone plays as a woman in multiplayer, you will be shooting them. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 11:00 PM |
| 6 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'This is not true. DICE and EA may not be making the games you like anymore. But someone is. I, for example, am an independent game maker. Indie games may not be as "wow" as you want, but we make them however the fuck we want. No one is telling us what to put in them, or if they are, I'm not listening. You are basically complaining about your big budget mainstream games becoming mainstream. Deal with it. Women play games. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:48 AM |
| 0 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'What ideology do you think is being pushed? If you don't like it. Don't play. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:29 AM |
| 4 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'There are literally thousands of games that don't have women. Did you ever play Tomb Raider, or Resident Evil? The Longest Journey? Any other of the thousands of games that have women? Games have always had women in them. This isn't new. This isn't neccessarily adding diversity for diversities sake, it could just be that some of the women who work at DICE and EA would like characters more representative of themselves. If you now want to change tack and talk about historical accuracy, let's try t… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:14 AM |
| 7 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Holy shit. Games are not an escape exclusively for men. They never were. If you don't like this new game. Don't play it. Play an old game. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:00 AM |
| 44 | Furious men demand for WW2 video game to remove the option for players to fight as women soldiers because it is 'rewriting history'Is this Men's Rights? Children are being mutilated to remove the end of their penis. Men are killing themselves. Why the fuck do we care about a video game featuring a war none of us fought in? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 07:33 AM |
| -1 | Men need to start standing together and supporting eachotherWe do. Maybe the problem is your group of peers. /r/theredpill is a good place to start | /r/MensRights | 07/06/18 08:12 AM |
| 0 | Woman Says Harry Potter Ride 'Fat-Shamed' Her Because She Couldn't Fitutm_campaign=BenShapiro Hmmmm | /r/TheRedPill | 10/05/18 08:29 AM |
| 2 | Southern Indiana mom admits molesting daughter, selling video for drug moneyWhere in this story is the system prioritising women over men? | /r/MensRights | 27/04/18 11:01 PM |
| 2 | Southern Indiana mom admits molesting daughter, selling video for drug moneyRight. So this article is about a woman who did a shitty thing. This is nothing to do with mens rights. Go join the women-haters group. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/18 10:20 PM |
| 2 | Southern Indiana mom admits molesting daughter, selling video for drug moneyWhat justice has been subverted? | /r/MensRights | 27/04/18 09:15 PM |
| 0 | Southern Indiana mom admits molesting daughter, selling video for drug moneyWomen do shitty things. How is this a men's rights issue? | /r/MensRights | 27/04/18 10:47 AM |
| 1 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductThat's ludicrous | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 08:03 AM |
| 1 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductI'm on the talk page now. Join me to form consensus. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 04:11 AM |
| 1 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductLol. So we can add that there's a controversy. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 03:43 AM |
| 2 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductDoes this New York Times article not constitute enough? | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 03:20 AM |
| 3 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductWould a source that simply shows the video and a transcript be enough to show that it was unwanted sexual contact? Or does there need to be some sort of conviction? | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 02:51 AM |
| 8 | Katy Perry's Wiki Is Still Missing Any Word Of Her Recent Televised Sexual MisconductWhat's required to "reliably report"? I can host a webpage that shows it. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 02:12 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter