TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kehlder Archive

View 1 post and 214 comments by kehlder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

kehlder/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:02 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

I'm not pretending anything at all, I don't condone his analogy. I was simply pointing out that he did not say what you claim he did.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 04:11 PM
–

I was referring to his comment, not saying that women don't need self-control. But keep putting words in my mouth, seems to be all you CAN do.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 04:09 PM
–

Did I make that argument? Nope. So why are you assigning it to me?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:12 PM
–

Self control, that's also something men are supposed to learn early on. If you're telling me his only option was to hit her hard enough to knock her out to prevent injury to himself then you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:14 PM
–

What strawman did I use?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:12 PM
–

A better way to put it is she was maneuvering him towards the street.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:40 PM
–

That's not at all what he said. Keep throwing out them there strawmen.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:37 PM
–

Not really. This is for future officers, most will never hold a rifle on deployment, much less actually see combat.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:09 PM
–

No. I don't think anyone should be put on a registry. I DO think those convicted of violent sex crimes or sex crimes against children should be put away for life, no possibility of parole. That's for actual sex crimes, not for drunkenly whipping your dick out to piss on the side of a street next to a school or anything like that.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 03:53 PM
-21

She said something that the police construed as admitting to it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:32 PM
–

Don't care, not convicted.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:28 PM
–

She was charged. It says nothing in this article about her being convicted. Therefore, she should be considered innocent until proven guilty and deserves the right to NOT have her name dragged through the mud.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:25 PM
–

But they still named her. That's not a good thing at all.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:05 PM
11

over 6'2", sure. I'm just shy of 6'1" and I weigh 180. Got a bit of pudge in my gut to account for a healthy amount of it.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 12:35 AM
–

I like how the word racist was in quotes, implying that it's inaccurate to label him that way.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:21 AM
3

Cutting ANYTHING off that isn't posing a clear and present health risk is mutilation.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:44 PM
2

Except 1% is WAY too high of an estimate/assumption.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:48 AM
1

It's not just in training. Watch your career drain away after you say something someone in another room found offensive. So offensive they report you to SHARPE cadre without even coming to you and saying they want you to stop.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:32 AM
7

You sure about that?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:36 PM
5

Not necessarily, either way, staying married to a woman you know is just waiting for the ammunition to completely fuck you over is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard of.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:57 PM
49

And your dad didn't finish the divorce? He decided to remain married to this woman?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:07 AM
–

Respect should be less earned and more lost. Everyone deserves respect, until they don't.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:58 PM
–

So the crime of attempting to get someone arrested for a life sentence is the same as the crime of attempting to murder someone. Do you have logic?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:37 AM
3

other victims ...
/r/MensRights10/05/16 09:05 PM
–

Cs get degrees.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:07 PM
–

I woke up swinging This implies nothing. It specifically states she left the state of sleep and immediately began attempting to hit something.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:35 PM
–

That's because your reading comprehension is shit.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:25 PM
1

And less than the full amount might make it hard for him to cover his bills.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:23 AM
–

Marines cannot be Drill Sergeants.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:38 PM
–

That's no Drill Sergeant.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:04 PM
–

He is exactly the commenter that u/moustachebus replied to.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:46 PM
–

They mentioned it. The defence said the man had no distress. Clearly lied, but they still mentioned it.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:03 PM
–

TL;DR You blatantly leave out the significant qualifier from the quote you seem to be referencing. Your deception here is in the same category as when many feminists say that women only make 77 cents to the dollar men make. Of all the men who reported being made to penetrate someone else 79% reported a female perpetrator. Source: NISVS 2010 Assuming this source is accurate, which I am personally not going to attempt to prove or disprove as it is not worth my time, and assuming this is the quote …
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:38 PM
-2

I didn't say we should despise feminism as a movement. I said we should not do as the feminists we despise do. Specifically the ones we despise.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:24 PM
–

I despise child rapists; coldblooded murderers(lacking a mitigating event); and unrepentant, manipulative liars. Do you have a reason besides your desire to feel superiority as to why I shouldn't despise these people?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 09:02 AM
–

You are doing EXACTLY what the feminists we despise do. Is that the road you want to take?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:11 AM
2

Supercede and supersede are both correct. Super-seeding is NOT correct. That is what was posted when I responded.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:04 AM
–

Supercede
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:56 PM
1

You can act how you like and we will continue to show that your view is not accepted by us.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:10 AM
4

Hahaha!
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:35 AM
3

Was giving advice to the guy who didn't have internet, not commenting about the guy who isn't allowed the internet.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 09:05 PM
5

Public library. It's why they're there.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:31 PM
1

How old were you? Jesus Christ...
/r/MensRights19/09/15 05:02 AM
19

The victim doesn't need to ask for charges to be pressed. He was under 17 when the sex started.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:52 AM
12

They absolutely should have been fired. One was his current teacher, the other was his teacher last year. No telling when they started fucking. Whether they should have been arrested is settled by an age of consent of 17 in that state. So yes, they broke multiple laws and should absolutely have been arrested, fired, and should be charged.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:49 AM
1

Someone or something?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:20 AM
2

There's a big difference between filming someone in their home and filming someone in my home.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:31 PM
3

Tosh disagrees.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:24 AM
-20

Because ha was dumb enough to agree to make these embryos in the first place? He made the decision to get himself tied up in this situation in the first place. Frankly I see less harm in him being "forced" to be a father than in her having her one chance at procreation taken from her. The fact that the law provides no way to remove responsibility in a situation like this is NOT the woman's fault and she should not be vilified for our judicial system's failings. As for everyone who points to the …
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:30 PM
-3

You see the same issues I do.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:48 PM
-11

I do understand where you are going with this, but there is such a thing as having compassion for the woman as well. In this scenario she CANNOT have children any other way. If we were talking about a man who had testicular cancer and for whatever reason decided that the best thing to do was create a shared embryo with his current SO instead of freezing just his sperm, would you support the woman's choice to destroy his only chance at children?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:45 PM
2

One can by not depending on the state for childbearing costs. What business is it of the state if the mother actually supports her own child?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:41 PM
-33

I'm not decided on this. Yes, she did sign an agreement. But if she can no longer have children otherwise, I think she has a right to the embryos. Just make him not financially responsible for them. End of story.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:04 PM
1

And you can't do more than 50+ push-ups? Sure...
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:54 PM
3

That's not even hard. Like at all. Unless you are grossly overweight.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:49 PM
-2

It's called context son, learn it. DI when relating to Marine Boot Camp means Drill Instructor. Why on Earth would you equate SmashBros controller tactics to Marine training?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:48 PM
2

We don't lower standards for race, only sex.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:44 PM
3

Just keep in mind that if it ends, end it amicably. Don't fuck each other over. Nothing worse than mutual hatred.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:00 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:13 PM
-3

This is not simply sex with a minor. This is sex with students over which she had authority.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:25 AM
-1

That seems cumbersome.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:18 AM
17

I'm a woman and a scientist, and I think his comments ARE funny. They are funny because women ARE successful in science, and it's obvious by all the pictures on Twitter of awesome female scientists confidently doing their jobs. I think if the "media" and policitians weren't inflaming the situation, most of the women actually IN science would have a great deal of fun ribbing him. People do flirt and fall in love wherever they work together, and science can be heady stuff. I run a lab that happens…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:15 AM
4

Quit thinking with your penis and you'll realize individual men don't need women in their lives, only the species needs them.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:53 AM
4

Except we actively denounce our extremists. I've yet to see any feminist aside from CHS denounce extreme feminists. They just make some quip about how they aren't real feminists and go about their day.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:08 AM
3

Ideas are all well and good, but what about actions?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:05 AM
1

Unit depending. Some don't put up with that shit.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:01 AM
1

You clearly have no ability to even think. Let's hypothetically say she did just throw out the case. Do you honestly believe that a judge illegally throwing out a case she is required to pass judgement on with a punishment is going to signify the end of it? Then you're a goddamned idiot. Instead, the prosecution will simply take the case to another judge, get the punishment they desire, maybe a few years in jail on top of life on the list, and then she loses her job and a judge who is sympatheti…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:54 PM
1

What would that accomplish? The case would have moved to a different judge, one less sympathetic to the truth, the kid would have actually been fucked, and there would never again be a judge rightfully being lenient to someone who shouldn't be punished. Have the sense to pick your battles and do the least harm.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:47 PM
23

Men are the primary victims of PMS. That should require no qualification and be just as valid as her comments.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:15 PM
4

Not in the way that you think. There was NO combat jump into either AO.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:02 AM
2

It was in this very discussion, with a link with her picture, details of her life, her online profiles, etc. It is most likely going to get deleted, just like the link I followed. Most likely a Reddit admin is doing the cleaning up to keep her "safe from persecution."
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:03 AM
4

Jackie Coakley.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:42 AM
3

Jackie Coakley.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:42 AM
-12

She's not anonymous.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:38 PM
5

I think the real question is 'is it worth my time and effort to have someone legally entitled to my life?' And the answer to a lot of people is 'no.'
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:48 PM
3

I'm not debating that. However, there are jobs in the Reserves that don't deploy, such as being an AC repair guy in the Active Reserves. They can easily bend the rules to keep her in and there's a pretty good chance of that happening with such a high profile case like this.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:26 AM
6

The Lautenberg Amendment only says you can no longer poses a firearm. Not instantly out of the Reserves.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:24 PM
2

Hopefully you are on your own and can show yourself the door on their lives.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:29 PM
1

Court Order can't get what was already destroyed. Most places overwrite weekly.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:41 AM
-1

I'm not excusing their action. I'm simply advising that you date people you share interests with. Much easier to hold a conversation when both sides have knowledge about the topic.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:59 AM
7

It's also quite possible that the ladies they've interacted with only care about boring ass shit. Like American Idol, or whatever else they spend their time watching. It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:32 AM
1

Just to play a counterpoint to one part of your post, maybe they spend more attention on their phone because you just aren't interesting to them. I know myself not to be too interesting or interested in casual conversation not directly related to my hobbies or work, for the most part.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:13 AM
1

The double standard lies in the first comment being widely accepted, according to our limited view, and the second being mostly frowned upon. If it's OK to make a post about a man's height being iffy for a relationship, then it should be OK to post the same about a woman's weight.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:24 PM
1

Check the name of the guy account.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:16 PM
5

You can say you don't care about a lot of things. You're actions define you, not your words.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:13 PM
2

Get a copy of the tape, if possible.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:42 PM
4

Get a copy of the tape, if possible.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:41 PM
3

Chances are his name wasn't in the statement, if there was one.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:40 PM
10

How do you define tipsy? At a minimum I would say not being able to walk correctly is required and due to my personal interaction with alcohol, slurred speech comes at the same time as walking funny. Given the details in the scenario I'd say they were roughly equal.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:36 PM
2

It's a school computer locked out of any and all privileges?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:19 PM
4

The requirements don't really matter during a draft, if you think about it.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:27 AM
3

More importantly in this case is that more reputable ads don't want ties back to torrents due to copyright issues. The only ad agencies willing to be associated with torrents are the porn/fuck buck/disreputable shit that mostly targets a male audience.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 01:24 AM
1

I said it might be a stretch. I didn't say it was inaccurate.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:21 AM
6

If this content is polluting front pages, how come I'm just now seeing it for the first time? Vitriol - cruel and bitter criticism. Perhaps calling it cruel is a step too far, otherwise the definition fits what you said and how you said it. Maybe you should look up a definition before you tell others to.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:46 PM
1

Who is Marc Lepine? Serious question, never heard of him.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:38 PM
8

His contribution is better than yours. Always remember, these points don't matter. Your vitriol is very telling about your character however.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:10 PM
2

I believe (note the believe part) that only applies to the police and other criminal investigation groups. Not info obtained illegally by private citizens.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:31 PM
1

To play devil's advocate on this particular point, they should be able to do a simple search of their databases to check whether this is the case or not. Should
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:59 PM
1

Sometimes I wanna trash my phone. This is one of those times. Thanks for the heads up. And you couldn't have replied to the most upvoted one? Jerk :)
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:57 AM
7

She's the woman who did a kickstarter campaign to study anti-women tropes in video games. She was given over 150k and has only produced 5, maybe 6 videos using that money. That money was given back in 2012. The purpose of that money was just to buy the games that she would simply play and give her thoughts on how women are portrayed in them. Of the videos she has made she usually takes extreme leaps of logic in an attempt to be angry about what she's watching/playing. Because of all of this she …
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:40 AM
12

I had to unfollow Joss Whedon when he started tweeting his support of Anita Sarkeesian. I'll still watch his productions, but now I'll be on guard about it.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:37 AM
1

You have to have a valid reason to look at ANY PII. In the US anyway.
/r/PussyPass23/08/14 08:23 AM
1

In the US Army this is taught as specifically about sex.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:19 AM
3

trollxc and trollyc have some entertaining content.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:26 AM
1

Quid pro quo. Do for me I do for you.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:14 AM
2

Go back and reread.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:15 PM
53

He isn't saying that about all women, he's saying that about women who believe they are the true victims of war as opposed to the soldiers who are out there killing and being killed. And yes, there are women out there who unashamedly believe that men are nothing more than meal tickets. I wouldn't believe it if I didn't know a few.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:55 PM
2

I don't find sex enjoyable. Seeing as how I was circumsized at birth I can't CONCLUSIVELY say it's because of that, but I'm not aware of any other reasons why sex bores me so much.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:19 PM
2

mean it's not wrong. FTFY
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:17 PM
0

Why exactly are yall downvoting a question? Somebody who doesn't know deserves to ask and not be vilified.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:13 PM
1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/fatal-distraction-forgetting-a-child-in-thebackseat-of-a-car-is-a-horrifying-mistake-is-it-a-crime/2014/06/16/8ae0fe3a-f580-11e3-a3a5-42be35962a52_story.html All of you who are taking this further than the disparity between males and females who are charged with crimes can burn in hell. Those of you who are, come up with statistics.
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 09:21 AM
6

14 hours in, still there...
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:31 PM
6

Ding Ding Ding The officers in my unit are far from the alpha males. They're just a bunch of college kids with more degrees than sense. The lower NCOs typically have the larger cajones. The only ones with more alpha status were the officers who started enlisted.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:56 PM
0

So I'm going to respond to some of the stuff you brought up. If the upcoming deployment is known about in advance, as they all are at this point, there are indeed provisions for action against service members getting pregnant. It's just rarely enforced and ultimately a slap on the wrist. The decision to punish or not to punish is held by the company or battalion commander most of the time. If you're company is as small as mine you likely are close to the commander. I shouldn't need to tell you t…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:51 PM
1

..............
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:16 PM
9

All of you supporting this guy should be ashamed of yourselves. He went in there with absolutely nothing and managed to insult them with just posting the name of this subreddit, which let's face it, is insulting. I came here to get cases of injustice brought to my attention but the fact that this is getting positive upvotes is enough to make me look elsewhere for non-circlejerking. Every once in a while there's an actual post on here worth looking at, but more and more it's dross. I'm not suppor…
/r/PussyPass20/07/14 10:34 PM
47

A Malaysian Airlines flight went down near the Ukraine/Russia border.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:22 PM
-10

#yesallamericans Also, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:13 AM
5

Most of the time (read: everytime I've heard of this happening) it's a case of a broken routine that ends in tragedy. I haven't been paying attention to this case because I assumed it was the same. If he did what you say, he needs to be drawn and quartered.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:11 PM
1

Never said it was, just mentioned that you are at college for a reason, so don't fuck it up.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:42 PM
3

Don't have sex in college. You're there to learn what you are paying good money to learn, don't chance fucking yourself over for a little fun.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:46 AM
11

Every woman, every day. At LEAST once.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:53 AM
-2

That maybe should be bolded.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:17 PM
6

And this is your reasoning for why we should continue the practice? Because YOU are satisfied with how YOUR penis has looked for as long as you can remember?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:15 PM
1

I can't tell if you're being facetious for effect or if he actually did all the things you say he did. I'm leaning towards the latter because I feel his life would have been too full to do all of these things and start a family.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:30 PM
1

My bad, read reason, not reasoning.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:45 PM
1

Where did you hear that as a reason?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:19 PM
8

In case anyone thinks he's being facetious, he probably isn't.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:04 PM
4

Phone fingers, thanks though. I'll leave it up.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:38 PM
17

Only from posting and replying. Unless the sub is locked to begin with, anyone can view it. If banning stopped your from viewing or following it would be too easy to circumvent.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:09 PM
0

What did they post to get shadowbanned? Genuine curiosity here.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:08 PM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:19 AM
1

Exactly. I was quoting from the picture.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:06 PM
1

"Don't be a pussy." Because I don't believe that any gender is inferior.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:36 PM
6

I think that's what they meant.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:03 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:09 AM
1

The fact of the matter is a choice was made about our bodies' futures. Whether we would be kept whole, the way we were born, or not. The choice was made without consulting us to satisfy our parents whims. If you were given the opportunity to cut off a portion of your parents' bodies and make it to where they would believe that they had always been the way they are now, would you? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:23 PM
3

It just makes me laugh when people talk about their rights while discussing something in a non-governmental forum. The Bill of Rights is a set of rules dictating how the government may interact with it's people. I don't have to give you a voice on my forum if I don't choose to. Me telling other people not to bother reading your comments is in no way infringing on your right to speech.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:09 PM
2

I can't tell if serious or troll. My radar must be busted.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:42 PM
8

Too bad the truth is irrelevant in today's court room. It's all about who's the flashiest, defense or prosecution.
/r/PussyPass19/03/14 07:32 PM
14

Or her body is more used to it.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 10:11 PM
2

You mixed up equal and most for men.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:37 PM
-5

I feel like we should start a tradition similar to what...I think it was Cato?...used to do and end all posts with, "and feminism needs to be destroyed." Then I realize it adds nothing to our conversations, just like your post. We all know what you've stated, the fact that we're here reading these posts without dismissing them is proof enough of this. Your comment and others like them just serve to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:50 AM
1

Implied it to me, so may imply to others. Intentional or no.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 06:35 PM
0

It should be mentioned, it's "boyfriend" not husband. Implies he's not man enough to have married her yet.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:02 PM
1

You mean the man who got shot after his wife assaulted their grown daughter.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:11 PM
6

I'm not saying it's easy to be a cop. I'm saying you have to be trying to kill someone with force, whether or not you are doing it consciously. If you don't have control over yourself enough that you can't keep from exerting the force necessary to kill someone, you don't belong in a field where self-control is a daily expectation.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:18 PM
11

Medical practitioners work in a field where mistakes inherently cause death. If you try to tell me that police officers should expect the death of those they are arresting as a possibility then you don't know anything about non-lethal takedowns. Especially considering how many officers were on hand. Edit: corrected auto correct.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:53 PM
1

I have no problem with this. People who assault me for no reason do not deserve the respect of my retaliation. If it escalates to something where I might be in danger, then I will retaliate.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:27 PM
2

It's pretty easy to be paranoid from the closet.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:00 PM
3

Doing a quickread and very light research I can't find anything about the three management women who left that would be sexist. The links provided by the writer don't say anything about Dropbox being sexist. The first one wrote about her entire career. In what she wrote she mentions having been subjected to sexism in Moscow. During the Soviet Era. That's how I read it anyway. The second doesn't link to why she left. I couldn't find anything on that page anyway. The last one doesn't even seem to …
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:00 PM
3

I wonder if they're paying him or if he's an idealist.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 12:43 PM
3

My point is, there's no need to talk about how you want to act like you want to act unless you want someone to make everyone else accept you as such. Do what you want to do, but don't come crying to me or the government when someone treats you in a way you don't like. "I'm not a man, I was just born with testicles" doesn't work on me. Or vice versa.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 12:34 PM
3

You can act however you want to, but don't expect me to bend over backward to help you fit in.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:08 AM
3

Nope, your penis must be hard, therefore consenting. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:08 AM
2

It's gonna get to the point where no one dares have sex.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:59 AM
9

" And, finally, the case from the current report that (unintentionally) best reveals the Kafka-esque environment that now prevails at Yale. Spangler indicates that 'an anonymous [graduate] student reported that a [graduate] student, who was not identified, made inappropriate remarks of a sexual nature.'" Say what now?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:14 AM
3

Human/s?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:36 PM
2

As much bullshit as this is, it says 18 months MORE. On top of an already 18 months. There's no need to embellish this story by saying only 18 months.
/r/PussyPass30/01/14 08:18 PM
2

I never thought of it that way. I suppose putting something in quotes does say that it's hypothetical.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:09 PM
5

There is no consent between teacher and student, that's the point. The teacher is perceived to have all the power in the relationship. Especially if the student is as enthusiastic about the situation as this one seems to be.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:12 AM
1

Honestly, that wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:45 PM
1

A franchise is not the same as a corporation. However, I've never heard of an Olive Garden with less than 15 people working there.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:29 AM
1

The most important part there is to not lower the standards. In my mind they should have different standards for different MOSs. The IT guy does not need to be able to carry an 80 pound ruck 20 miles a day. His sole purpose on the battlefield is to supply upper level coms to the brigade/battalion staff. Hardly any of that is physical work. The people on the front line will be carrying 80 pound rucks and dragging 250+ pound personnel who have had their limb/s blown off. Those standards need meeti…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:31 PM
2

While I do know of plenty of videos, I'm at work, doing this on my phone so...
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:54 PM
31

This comment would be 1k times better with a YouTube link in each individual word to a video of an aggressive drunk woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:18 PM
1

Slaps on the wrist will get you everywhere in his world.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:50 PM
2

I second this. I too have seen this. And it disgusted me so much, I punched a baby, cause fuck you, that's why! Seriously though, I also saw that.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:51 AM
1

Not quite right. I have no problem mating with a girl who isn't a beautiful woman. Not a troll, but not a princess, if you catch my drift. Looks aren't everything, or even the most important thing. Not being crazy, having the same interests as me, being able to support themselves, these are what are most important to me. After these come touch, then looks. Call me wierd but thats my rankings.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:33 AM
0

Depends on who is paying for their choices, at least in my book. I don't think if you are morbidly obese by your own decision making process that you should ever qualify for state help in any form, to include state run health care, welfare, etc. But that's just my opinion. Of course, if you already were in those programs before hand, say you lost a leg on the job and can no longer stay as active as you could before, maybe something can be arranged. Then again my opinion really doesn't matter, I'…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:12 AM
0

I think he means rather they're very specific as to why you have no worth. Weird can mean a lot of different things. Fat and ugly mean just about exactly one thing each. Fat means I think you are too large for what you should be. Ugly means you don't seem attractive to my ideal. Wierd can mean so much, what does it really matter, you know?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:06 AM
-1

You're saying that as though you expect women in combat roles will be held to the same standards as their male counterparts. I highly doubt that is how it's going to end up. That may be how a lot of us want it to become, but we aren't the policy makers.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:17 AM
-3

So a type of disease where you can directly attribute a statistically significant number of cases to laziness and gluttony? Say it isn't so!
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:14 AM
6

That...goddamn...tears...can't stop.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 05:34 AM
1

you posted twice man
/r/MensRights05/07/13 05:01 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cq864/another_mans_life_ruined/c9j74ev
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:19 AM
3

Except some places have laws that explicitly state that a female is unable to be guilty of breaking that law until she is 17. The citation is further up in the post, so I won't repost it here.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 05:39 PM
1

They're expanding their moneyfarms. Seems to me they aren't making enough money anymore.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:33 PM
1

No, they think we're agents of the Patriarchy come to eat their souls.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:05 PM
2

Now, now, leave lawyers be. I need them for my divorce.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:57 PM
1

Ouch. Right in the feels man.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/13 12:08 AM
3

They're in there. Some crazy, most flabbergasted.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 08:36 AM
2

I got the sarcasm you threw.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:50 AM
1

Your comment doesn't apply to my situation, but it is a pretty decent description of most of them. Which branch? I'm guessing Army based off the countries.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:48 AM
1

What is this place? Ah, Mens' Rights! Hadn't heard of this branch before.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:44 AM
2

I've always had the thought that faces are so much harder to change than weight. Not that I think anyone needs to change for my personal taste.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:26 AM
1

I'll take your back on this one. There is just a little too much sensitivity going around. I'm not saying that a little sensitivity is bad, just that there might be just too much.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:24 AM
0

Me too, man. Me too.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:22 AM
1

I see what you're doing and I approve. I too wish to see more breasts.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:21 AM
-2

I don't think of any women as sluts, except those who live up to the definition. Commence the downvotes.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:57 AM
2

You're an idiot. This person just logically stated why fighting is important, even if he threw in some random nonsense about fighting to save your life at the beginning. It seems to me you didn't even bother to confront the Facebook posts in the first place. People say and do stupid things until someone they associate with tells them off. That could have been you. Instead they said something you didn't agree with and you immediately folded and withdrew. You said yourself that you didn't fight at…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:46 AM
1

Suddenly, a wild chuckle.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:36 AM
1

No, but they can avoid the internet that they can't ban by never leaving their strongholds of bandomness.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:08 AM
3

The hivemind has spoken.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:02 AM
2

To be fair, she lost her job because she was doing it poorly. Her job is to steer business to her company by making it look good. She did the exact opposite. Of course she got fired.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:51 AM
3

I can hear the burn IRL. So much.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:46 AM
1

Actually, the point here is the other things posted on the page that contradict the article. The article is about how men are bad, the surrounding links are about women that are evil. Look at the picture.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:18 AM
1

I'm with you on this. There has never been an occurrence of anyone saying that rape is ok in my presence. For anything. At all. Why do women assume that this is the case? That us males just stand around all day saying things like this? I don't even... Reddit is not an accurate example of male culture. It is an example of kids acting like kids by saying stupid things.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:13 AM
2

You double posted. Man I wish I had average privilege though.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:42 PM
16

She doesn't have to play ALL of them before she starts making videos. Maybe 3 a month then a video. How hard is that? It's not like she needs to play every single aspect of a game, just once or twice through the story mode should be plenty.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:06 PM
0

Saying that you are putting her life in danger from childbirth with rates of maternal mortality being as low as they are is the same as saying that asking someone to pick up a gallon of milk from the store is putting their life in danger. EVERY DAY a child is born that is unwanted by its father, yet nothing is done to stop this. If a woman has the right to choose whether a child is born or not, the man who helped conceive should have the EXACT SAME right. There would be a FAR greater outcry if t…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:03 PM
1

That's okay, I'll wait.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:04 PM
1

Is it any more brutal than having your child's life end before it began? You're not asking her to die, just not to kill. I'm pro-choice, but only when both can make the choice.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:02 PM
-1

Cognitive Dissonance says you can be both.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:58 PM
19

so when I paid for the date, I WASN'T OFFENDED.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:55 PM
6

That's because you've been indoctrinated.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:54 PM
12

You don't get it.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:24 PM
3

Youtube is great for character assassination in this instance. You should probably have a friend upload it from a public computer with the woman's name on it. Then, use it as a reference during court proceedings. Just say you found this recording of the encounter on the web. Also, should be implied, use a throwaway account for upload.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 03:07 AM
1

TIL some women have consciences. If true, gives me hope for humanity. In case some people(read feminists) think I hate women, this post was sarcastic. The post, not this edit.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:59 AM
1

You can e-mail in some jails. For something like what he would be arrested for, he would be in one.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:51 AM
2

There isn't.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:47 AM
0

Shes a feminist. Just sayin'. Probably wants you castrated as a condition of seeing your kids.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:45 AM
1

May not be ethical, but turn the tables on her. Get a friend with similar sized fists to beat you on the chest, and possibly slap you. Then, before any possible bruising on your face appears, go to her place and call 911. Works better if you have a beard to cover red marks. After writing this post realized that this won't work with the restraining order, probably why she got it in the first place. Not that ANYONE would believe you, male.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:40 AM
2

Only if he can get the local media on his side in this. Otherwise, only reddit will know.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter