TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

keithtalent Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by keithtalent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What does it take for /r/MensRights to grasp that this kind of advertising and literature is targetted at men exclusively because of a perceptual imbalance in the rhetoric, manner and understanding of a large number of men towards their female counterparts? Larger and with deeper impact than the equivalent amongst women. If you didn't enjoy the above paragraph, please take the time to reread it, perhaps removing the specifications of gender and the mention of /r/MensRights simply to see if it co…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:53 AM
1

Holy shit, I apologise, I had no idea anyone would use such a ridiculous measurement. Thanks for supplying evidence, however, it doesn't persuade me as to single-women earning more than single-men being a reliable principle. Particularly given that Atlanta was the largest disparity given an entirely seperate issue of race and pay. Also I find it hard to believe that the prevalence of STEM degrees being higher in men doesn't lift the average, also the fact that in cities where STEM companies are …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:19 PM
-1

At no point in my argument does it state that it is solely derived from top paying jobs. Women who aren't working aren't taken into account (I assume otherwise the entire statistic is meaningless), if the statistic is derived from lifetime earnings then I'm at a loss as to why that metric is used. Simply put, I can't see how you justify the notion that single women earn more than single men even on average given the massive disparity caused by high income positions which are mostly filled by men…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:27 PM
0

I am totally willing to learn, noone has given me anything to learn by. I have considered the reasons men and women earn more, the statistic is derived from the heaviest weighted amounts right? Top paying jobs. They literally are mostly occupied by men, right? That's why the statistic is imbalanced. In the past society had poor attitudes towards women, right? We don't now (generally) but there is still a funamental lack of evidence that women can perform certain roles, we might hypothesise that …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:50 PM
1

I like /r/mensrights and I like what it's trying to do, it's important that movements like feminism don't go unchecked and it's important that legitimate men's issues get the attention they deserve. Unfortunately, it's big enough now not to be able to distinguish between legitimate and semi-legitimate patrons and has the effect of information selection on any comments that don't follow the main. But that's missing the point of any group like /r/mensrights if you start to select information to su…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:31 PM
-7

The problem with your argument is that blue collar contributes the least to that statistic, it's not adjusted for type of job. Also, maternity leave is paid and happens what... twice in a womans lifetime on average? Which women are waiting until after having children to start careers? A huge minority who aren't factored into the statistic. Women are paid less than men, but it's changing so don't worry. But it is 100% true. Danger pay is a bullshit argument and ancilliary points about taking your…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:51 PM
1

I think if a woman forces (i.e. at gunpoint) a man to have sex with a second man that gets close.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:11 PM
1

Oh, I couldn't really comprehend if the facebook image was a conversation or not (the white blocks make it look like single user comments) so I didn't really understand it at first. Obviously, what they're saying is piff, but you can't expect equanimity from the incensed. They practically said all women in pornography are forced to be and are underage and are raped, plus all viewers of pornography are 11 year old boys. Her opinion can be safely and justifiably be removed from any meaningful disc…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:25 PM
1

That's kind of what I'm asking for, what am I supposed to read? I read the petition on change.org I didn't see anything bad about it.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:39 PM
1

I actually don't understand what you're arguing against. I think the idea of banning 'rape pornography' being a stepping stone for censorship is both less credible and less likely than the idea of 'rape pornography' being a stepping stone for sexual taste to enter bizarre and horrible territory. I can't see how even consensual depiction of rape should be something on pornography websites.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:41 PM
1

I wonder what the reaction would be if she wasn't pretty.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:53 PM
2

I don't think it's wrong. Either joke (yours or theirs) can be innapropriate, but I don't think either are emblematic of how people really feel. I don't think either of these sentiments have an influence over the behaviour or attitude of real people. I think it's a bit of an assumption to assume that people would be 'up in arms'. Plus I hate to point out that your arms (and others) seem raised over this.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:44 PM
2

That poster is terrifying.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:12 PM
5

Wow. I feel like I saw something I did not want to see here. This feels like gore in a weird sort of a way, her mind switched in a second with some bizarre, misplaced opportunism. This is detractive from the net legitimacy of genuine gender harrassment. So much so. Really horrible. Poor bloke.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter