TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kequilla Archive

View 1 post and 24 comments by kequilla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

Social Issueskequilla/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The subs ppl are okay. Its the mods who are cancer.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:30 PM
9

And than courts pursue this derivation of pairbonding. The more this is done, the more mangled gender relations will get.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:21 PM
1

"Villages also used charivari in cases of adulterous relationships, against wife beaters, and unmarried mothers. It was also used as a form of shaming upon husbands who were beaten by their wives and had not stood up for themselves." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charivari Also the origin for lynching for more egregious offences. Note that both wife beaters, and men beaten by their wives were subject to community shaming in this manner. Edit: https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Lynching
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:56 PM
1

Feminism and mens advocacy were never opposed in principle. The genders are codependant; what affects one, affects the other. The problem arose in feminists attacks on mens advocacy, and feminist actions that went too far. The way they turned on casey jaye for her production of the red pill documentary is a big example. This is not a new thing either, as erin pizzey is another example. Another example is warren farrel, who spoke for feminism for years. If men want to fix the problems that afflic…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:49 PM
1

Thats not exactly wrong. A lot of the ways men are harmed are deeply personal, so a grudge is both warranted language, and warranted response. Add on how feminists have treated mens advocacy, and how do those personal grudges evolve? Healthy evolutions find community and common cause. Unhealthy ones feminists point to to further delegitimize mens problems. Its a growing schism.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:37 PM
5

Ppl used to be able to accept generalizations as such.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:38 PM
1

A line mt uncle says "if she cant find you handsome, she can at least find you handy."
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:35 PM
2

"Every weekend..." "Equal" Gtfo...
/r/MensRights20/06/19 11:32 AM
24

If that were a woman, 'she' could've used the battered wife defence.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 11:29 AM
5

How do you know their talking about "she" or "her" negatively? Why couldn't they be, say, referencing something said by the honey badger brigade? Edit: Further points. Feminism has shit the bed. This is evidenced by stories like earl Silverman and Erin pizzey. It's evidenced by facts like the proportion of feminists in Tyne general population, and the proportion of man heating feminists in the population of feminism. If you had an abuser, would you trust said abuser with helping you get out from…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:53 AM
1

Picture isn't the author. Judge less, read more.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 01:47 AM
1

That's written as a directive, not an explanation.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 01:36 AM
6

Plus or minus the sweaty smell. Compounded over time as it soaks into chairs. Increasing cleaning costs. Deodorant only helps so much.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:31 PM
5

His perspective on how to help men in therapy is particularly good. It cuts right through the bullshit of the APA saying men aren't getting help because of traditional masculinity.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:04 PM
1

Keeping a degree of centeredness can be healthy. Taking it too far blinds one to what others face, and can lead you to slow changes that make their lives more livable, or even blind you to coming problems you never knew you could have.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:36 AM
1

http://www.noharmm.org/mothering.htm
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:33 AM
2

I don't know how to interpret your first sentence. Lambasting means to harshly criticize. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/lambaste ​ Applying charity, you might mean bringing. ​ Its not a balanced way to look at it. Its looking at the Jews as why the practice persisted into the modern era, but you try to give some credit to Christians ending it. READ http://www.noharmm.org/mothering.htm
/r/MensRights22/11/18 12:40 AM
2

It in fact has cleaning properties, and helps prevent infections. http://www.noharmm.org/mothering.htm Edit: It's a myth that it is just skin.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:43 PM
5

Hygiene is a none point. Bullshit about urinary tract. Bullshit about STIs (a study in fact corrupted the data by advising condom usage in one group and not the other) And as bullshit as cutting off your arm so it won't get cancer. Now, in terms of harm, I'll describe just one: ripping. I've had it rip a few times; takes weeks to heal, and hurts like Hell. Mines minor, it can get as bad as needing erectile suppressors, else the person suffer from chronic tears plus infections.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 06:06 PM
3

If you know your stuff, it's existed longer than that. It's all a problem. Singling out is singling out, whether it's you thinking Jews were the source and holdfast for infant/young genital mutilation, or if feminists think men are the source and holdfast for any number of their perceived evils.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 05:00 PM
6

Many societies; Singling out Jews makes me look askew at you.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 02:47 PM
7

Theres no health benefits.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 02:45 PM
2

First aid saying: if it's in, it stays in.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:50 PM
7

There's a second part of that thought. Sometimes there really is a problem with people around you. Watch your eye for planks, and watch you're not living in Sodom or Gomorrah.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter