TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kfijatass Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by kfijatass on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Not to crap on this but I'm 6'5'' and pets are welcome 👌
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:11 AM
6

Business is as business do.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/18 06:56 AM
1

It is as much of a joke as get back to the kitchen jokes were for feminists, imo . Sexist doesn't exclude a joke from being one.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:16 AM
1

Pretty certain that's not the case at least as far as jokes go, though it may be a by-country basis thing.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:05 PM
1

That they're only pretending to be genderless. Being genderless is impossible to enforce in this particular case so it's obviously setting up for the latter sentence.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:05 PM
-1

The latter. "Oh look how progressive we are! Not" - they're just making fun of gender neutrality policies. Is it a poor joke? Maybe. But it's a joke.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:01 PM
-6

It's very clearly a joke. The two sentences are literally said back to back. The reaction to this is like that of butthurt feminists at a chauvinist joke; the parallel is uncanny.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:22 PM
29

Are you surprised? The comic is literally @AntiFemComics
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:10 PM
5

Chances are she's not referring to them, assuming she even knows about such extremists. I do agree its a sweeping statement not accounting for nuance. Not something I really expect out of a celebrity though.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:52 AM
3

Kind of how liberalism as a word is twisted in US. Can't say I support this driven word agenda.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:37 AM
28

The argument only makes sense if you mean feminism as in egalitarianism which is how the term is used sometimes. I give her the benefit of the doubt she meant the latter.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:19 AM
-1

The point is there's plenty of assumptions and buzzwords here as well.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:35 PM
1

Looks like advanced troll.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:58 PM
1

Don't read so much into it; it's normal for a smaller creature to be on its toes in presence of a larger one. Its like you were a kid and got shivers on your back each time your parents got angry. Its a pretty normal response.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:08 AM
15

Sounds like someone desperate for attention.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:04 PM
1

I mean it doesn't show them in a more sympathetic light than you would a pathological drug addict as a sick person from what I can remember.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:13 PM
62

"Why didn't they just run you out of town?" Out of a bowling hobby club? Seriously? People can be that rejecting to do that just because someone sucks? Surprised that question even escaped the reporter's mouth.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:31 PM
1

I think it's safe to say that one of those factors is society's current attack on males. (And you agree with that). One of the many possibilities to be precise. Now hold on. Calling out the feminists/SJWs for being hateful towards us is not "hate". Was there actually any male bashing since the shootings or is everyone taking OP's word for it? Just curious. I'm not saying about any of those things - standing against male shaming is all fine and dandy where it applies, but using the subject of sho…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:55 PM
1

If there's reasons to believe so, it is worth examining. But that's not the point being made here.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:47 PM
1

I don't have a problem with it in itself where it applies, merely inserting it into every discussion much like extreme feminists blaming men do.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:44 PM
2

Well, you are certainly being stubborn here. It's part of my charm. Let's do a psychological profile on this guy. His parents died. He was bounced around from household to household. He stopped going to school. Safe to say he felt ostracized by society. Being ostracized by society is a much larger bunch of issues, influenced by many more factors than male victimization, calling being ostracized by society male victimization is baseless jumping to conclusions. I just oppose pushing in SJW/Feminis…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:35 PM
2

But it is a major factor. As you yourself pointed out. No, I did not say it is major, merely not primary. Proof of primary factor behind any of the shootings would, for instance, be confessions, motivations or a psychological profile. I don't mean to say there's one major reason at all; merely that saying that male victimization is all there is to such complex mental issues that lead to either shootings or suicide is a gross simplification. The burden of proof does not lie on me here, I wasn't t…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:20 PM
-13

I don't see how one is disconnected from the other with the OP in context. I don't deny demonization exists, I deny it's the sole or even primary contributor to either male suicide or the shootings unless someone shows me otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:36 PM
-18

There's many contributing factors, boiling it down to one or two target hate groups you assume are the reason or primary contributing factor with no proof I find disingenuous if not insulting to the people that are prone to suicide. God this sub is growing more and more into a hate sub by the minute.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:08 PM
-32

That... wasn't the motivation of any of the recent killings. Unless you've proof otherwise? Edit: Speak through evidence, not downvotes.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:03 AM
2

Not proven by court, but the enter Hollywood tape and his other quotes speak for themselves that he's not clean as far as sexual harassment goes. I'm supportive of equal rights, bu doing do this way by this man is just intended to divide.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:45 AM
0

Yeah I could tell by the comment going from +10 to -6.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:05 PM
-4

It's difficult to agree given the context of his own situation and see it as more than deflection. If it was anyone not under multiple sexual harassment allegations, I'd find it easier to support.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:41 PM
3

They're certainly more immune to consequences of law as shown.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:40 PM
-1

Let's see how many I can remember at the time. Lying statistically roughly 2/3 to 3/4 of the time, he contradicts himself or lies on twitter on a daily basis Being an all-round diplomatic embarrassment, with Britain and Britain First, white supremacists, celebrities down to twitter hassles with the average joe Obstruction of justice as following Nixon precedent The shitshow in Puerto Rico Golfing more than working The Enter Holywood tape, Giving out intelligence freely, endangering many in servi…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:37 PM
0

Show what exactly? What you think your comment history entails ? Being critical of someone does not equate dislike, though I am yet to find something likable about the man.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:14 PM
1

I said it's evidence of comparably low scrutiny and responsibility for ones actions, not corruption.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:11 PM
1

Respectfully, I was shown little positive to think otherwise about the man as president.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:32 PM
-3

Rich celebrities generally face a fraction of consequences and responsibility to a president. No comparison. You need only to look at Harvey Weinstein to see how accepting US is of Hollywood's corruption.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:23 PM
-5

No crime even required; presidents of other countries resigned honorably for far, far lesser offences of office. I have no personal dislike towards the man.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:20 PM
-6

He actually donated to Democrats more until 2009sh and ran as Democrat as well. I'm rating him by his words, actions and his truthfulness as president. What he is like in private life has little bearing. He's a chauvinist, racist megalomaniac, a sociopath, a notorious liar, a hypocrite and an incompetent buffoon. He's way beyond the margin for being indicted.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:03 PM
2

Oh not you in particular OP, more like the comments here.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:56 PM
-2

No, but his words and actions show little to dissuade them. See the Enter Hollywood Tape. Also, I'm sorry, but advocating for men's rights is not exclusive with advocating for women's rights... I didn't even post in /r/feminism in my life. Insults. Cuck, really? You're really channeling mr Grab'em by the pussy there. You just proved you're beyond reason. Good day.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:55 PM
0

I don't see how that proves him being a good man. To be fair he was noticeably different in 80s, but something changed along the way, almost like he became another man entirely. I digress but I'm curious what that triggering event was.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:43 PM
-3

You can literally feel the /r/The_Donald brigading.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:40 PM
-5

For which allegation? Pick your poison. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:39 PM
11

He's a lot of things, but being good man is not among them.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:35 PM
-5

That's not the issue. The issue is he's deflecting because he's accused of sexual harassment himself... and he's guilty.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:35 PM
4

You reap what you sow. “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” ― H.L. Mencken, On Politics: A Carnival of Buncombe
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:31 PM
12

Just because a lot of people are underpaid doesn't mean they cancel each other out.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:56 PM
39

Just poking at an entitlement bit, most people are entitled to it for over 50 years now.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:09 PM
538

To be fair that doesn't show a sex issue, that shows a people-are-generally-underpaid issue.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:38 AM
14

So who's the poor white guy in this scenario ? The antagonist?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:10 AM
7

Any examples of that in Marvel comics? I admit I am not a comic reader, didn't realize when/how that happened.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:48 AM
1

Devil's advocate here - she's not referring to actual suicide - merely using the threat of suicide as an emotional tool. Granted it's not something exclusive to men, but it is a malicious tool of manipulation nonetheless.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:21 AM
9

Let's not generalize, shall we?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:33 AM
3

Looks like a crappy joke in poor taste and a birthmark. This doesn't look like a blackeye. Hold your pitchforks gentlemen.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:32 AM
4

Saying the word nigger isn't impolite, it becomes impolite when you start using it against someone.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:00 AM
5

Don’t send pictures of your nudes unless he just asked for them. Can we skip this one? Please?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:40 PM
1

Which doesn't make the first one any better.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:14 AM
3

It's not stressing importance or sex, it's denoting fragility/defenselessness, which is why women are often paired with children in such headlines. "Killing 10 women and children" sounds more shocking than "killing 10 men" no matter how you phrase it.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:44 AM
2

The word you're looking for is egalitarianism​.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:24 PM
2

A bit off topic , but I'm a male feminist (in the egalitarian type of way, not the triggered third wave as it's mentioned here) and I'm a bit ticked you crossed me off as useless. I'd dare say masculinity or femininity has no major impact on "usefulness", whatever that implies.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:20 PM
1

I mean you could as well just not mention women and children and it wouldn't really shift the message. A lot of people died, among them plenty of the defenseless sex and age, it's not an intentional omission of men imo.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:35 AM
2

All right, I stand corrected. I suppose in war women and children are considered defenseless as opposed to men, hence the stress on them. Not great but I don't find it jarring as lack of mention of men in most material here.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:49 PM
-7

I don't believe this is as bad because men in this case are mostly in the army or fighting; too few and too difficult to count were civilian male deaths. Hard to classify deaths precisely as male victims as opposed to the more obvious female and child victims.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:41 AM
14

In the end, hard right or hard left decides only the direction you go in circles in.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:29 AM
1

Considering the company he's in, this looks almost like an upgrade.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:00 PM
5

Nice work mods.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter