TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

khanspam Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by khanspam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

yes? nothing new here
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:15 AM
8

They are just switching sides when they need you
/r/MensRights27/07/26 11:26 PM
41

You are not wrong and it's just different ways to see it. Saying rape is a spectrum means that just having sex is always a little bit of rape, eg. 0.01% rape, which makes them win/right in every situation, entertaining that rape is omnipresent when it's just not. I believe the word rape is overused. Ex told me I raped her because I broke up with her haha. She obviously screamed it so loud for all the neighbours to hear. I then refuse to say it's a spectrum. It was NOT rape. 0%, not 5%
/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:26 PM
220

It's in their advantage to say it's a spectrum, so they can apply it whenever they want. It's like neurodiversity and such, it's become trendy to self-diagnose with ADHD... Anyone who looks at their phone or drinks coffee while working can say they have ADHD, a perfect excuse or whatever.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:56 AM
7

37 is so dumb lol
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:56 AM
1

You keep getting it wrong. First you clearly implied she was a victim. Secondly, now, she is not an alleged victim anymore. She was one. You can't "use the word victim as a respectful term" without blatantly disrespecting the other party. Clearly what happened and it doesn't seem to bother you. I recommend making an effort to choose the right words and it'll help you shape views that are right. I'm out
/r/MensRights11/07/26 10:49 AM
4

There is no proof this woman told the truth. You also don't have hard proof he did something nefarious. Yet you call her a victim. Isn't that seriously insane? Thank god you are only a judge on reddit and in your femcel groups.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:21 AM
3

And the "patriarchy" pays them to write this shit?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:13 AM
1

Nice that's a good start. Now how about an ONS ("romantic" and consensual to be clear, and before you bring up the R-word) and still being a gold digger? Can you picture it?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 01:07 AM
4

Hey I have a question, you don't believe in gold diggers? Let's talk about this specific topic.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:22 AM
0

Your only examples are about bunnings (idk even wtf that means) and drugs from more than 7 years ago? This shit is like accusing someone of rape 7 years later when nothing can be proven in front of the law and you are just having a paranoid episode. Then you are just showing "Lying and being manipulative to get a girl or keep a girl is bad" but totally omitted the "will screw you over" which is in your title somehow. Please bring a little more value than that, it currently sounds like you are ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 05:05 PM
4

Hey, don't worry, I can put myself in her situation. Your empathetic story worked - I'm in her shoes, I can feel it! She's completely nuts and belongs in a psychiatric hospital. Her supporters, too. I can't wait for the courts results, this is actually exciting and promising for men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 06:02 PM
3

You literally said "he agreed", followed by "he never wanted". Make it make sense. Nice little story, you are trying very hard.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:11 PM
3

Exactly, she heard the Pelicot story and thought "Wow that could be me I can make the news"
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:00 PM
1

Ohhhhh when we dig a little deeper, suddenly it isn't that bad after all. Thanks for your intervention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:49 AM
1

Have you read Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus. I only skim-read it, but I think it would help you browse some of the unavoidable conflicts in long-term relationships. Most require completely different relational skills that can't be applied to early dating. A relationship is constant work. A lot of people only put in the work at the beginning, which is why the issues you mention are undetectable early and therefore your advice don't apply here at all. Back to work!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:06 AM
-1

Spot on
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:55 AM
–

I'm pretty sure you have a tendency to imagine these issues in the most negative way, because you can: He just wants sex => you are testing his patience not giving him sex after n so many dates when you clearly wouldn't mind He doesn’t want to work => he got laid off but you have the mindset "no job now, not that successful / isn't ambitious" He’s addicted to gaming => he mentioned gaming once and it gave you the "ick" for no constructive reason He wants to see other women => yup, adults date mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 10:38 PM
–

4
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 10:00 PM
5

When you go from single to a relationship, you likely want to keep doing what you were doing when single. If not it means you need a woman to sort out your life. Freedom might be the wrong word because it's too general, and we should talk about free time instead. Way too many couples fall into complacency and watch TV all day just because "they must spend time together". For sure there are different degrees of risk regarding what people will do in their free time, depending on whether it's socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:00 PM
1

Drama. Women love an emotional rollercoaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:43 AM
46

it's still trained on humans
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:06 PM
1

It is not an attack against women who do these things. It's me comparing "hyperactive" men to women, aka feminine/gay energy. Yet women love them because they are... visible. It's actually the opposite, they feel so bad doing nothing, they would do anything without purpose just to look adequate and "active". And that's sexy? I find the superficiality quite unfair, even though I love plant shops honestly. Just got even better things to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:56 PM
1

I'm not against all of the above. Where I'm getting at is, people excessively try to do these things just to do something, not because they love it. Similar to "You should join some club to make friends". They go not for the activity, but for a parallel social motive. It's fake. We know a good standup is fun, we know a library smells good with a great atmosphere that makes us feel clever even without reading or buying, we know yoga pants makes you feel hot and alive. Yet, what did you achieve to…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:31 PM
4

^ real alpha woman right there
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:55 PM
0

Such a good question, what activities are we even talking about. Going to the library? Theatre? Standup comedy show? Yoga? Plant club? I wish I had time for this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:47 PM
0

It's mainly men don't value the social validation side as much. It's secondary. Men work for themselves. Instead women aim to be validated by a few men so that if one isn't safe enough for them, they move to the next one. For men their safety/success is self-made, for women it's socially made. Obviously, a man who is self-made and socially validated, is the ideal best and ultimate proof of overall success. Pretty rare though. Take the example of a man who buys an expensive car without owning a h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:36 PM
1

No shit people are superficial. Stop these activities and you are back to square one, having achieved literally nothing apart from an instagram portfolio.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:30 PM
4

The problem is, a lot of the "hyperactive" men are actually showing feminine traits, without controlled action, direction and results at all. They are just seeking out social validation. Like waking up with the only thought "Who's going to enjoy my presence today?" or "What can I post on insta today?". Pretty gay if you ask me. Yes it's feminine, women do this a lot, spending it all on weekends, restaurants and holidays, showing they are up to something even if it's superficial. They are so busy…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:12 PM
–

You are the only one to see sex here, soz. Can't have a discussion about dating without you bringing up sex every single time you want to make a point. It's like you are what you try to depict men as, sex addicts. #projection
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 10:51 PM
–

We talk about love and respect but you are the one making weird links to groupie sex intentions, out of nowhere. Not just wrong (they are usually teenagers), it comes out of nowhere as neither OP or myself mentioned that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:59 PM
–

Are you talking to yourself and are you okay? Never mentioned groupie.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:20 PM
–

💖*~ okay ~*💖
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 01:57 PM
–

She says, coloring books 🥹
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 11:31 AM
2

Alright rockstar. Not the good one, though. A lot of famous people have respect for their fans.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:32 AM
1

Are you learning today that men are attracted to actual beauty and that women, not only that, but also to what makes them feel safe (money & social success)?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:31 AM
3

💖*~ I wouldn't speak with a flair like that ~*💖
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:27 AM
1

Fore sure, until a woman won't accept your date location because it's too cheap to her. Never happened to me though, so you may be right. I'm not in the US however, and not asking biches on dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:29 PM
1

Comment you responded to tried to say these issues are used as "fake moral outrage", and you're proving it by extensively elaborating on them and ignoring the "non-exploitive" porn altogether. But that’s not the type of pornography OP is talking about here. He explicitly (ha!) states in his hypothetical example that the guy is “beat(ing) his meat to an online video of another girl”. Wrong, OP didn't refer to these issues when mentioning "an online video of another girl". Presumably anti-porn wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:30 AM
0

LOL: her own article in beauty category no proof to prove her point: I am sitting on the tube on my way to a casting when opposite me I see an ad for an insurance company. The model looks just like me, but something is unsettling about the picture. I’ve never done a shoot for this insurance company, but I recognise my features, and the pose, hair and make-up are similar to a shoot that I did back in 2018 for a Paris-based magazine. I take a picture of the ad but try to dismiss it from my mind. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:42 AM
0

Hypocrisy maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:11 AM
0

No, it’s not "tangible likeness of a person". It’s a new, synthetic image with no real individual behind it. That’s the whole point you’re skipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:08 AM
1

"Don't watch porn!" meanwhile.... "Oh this feels soooooo goood and different"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:59 AM
1

Besides, is it cheating if I send pics of my naked body to a random man online? If yes, then it's cheating for men to seek out images of naked women online. Wow, do you hear yourself? That's an extremely unbalanced comparison, one is active, the other is passive. Sending nudes to a random person is direct sexual interaction with someone. Watching porn is just looking at pre-made content with no relationship or interaction. Or did you mean posting on a platform like Pornhub under a nickname and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:53 AM
1

Your only arguments are about pedophilia, incest, racism. What else, rape? Oh you almost mentioned it as well with "AI training without consent". You are avoiding the question using political stuff. What you listed exists and these are valid points (apart from AI, fake news), but shouldn't be the main ones. What do you think of amateur porn, where no one is infantilised, pretending to be part of the same family or without race fetish? You really all struggle to answer this simple question and we…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:21 AM
0

Yes, and that’s exactly why it’s not a consent issue here either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:10 AM
-1

Great, now that the anti-male sentiment is out of the way, what's your opinion on porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:38 PM
-2

While possible to do one and not the other, I don't believe a second that someone who is pro-masturbation will not touch any porn. I see you coming, you just want to make a political point saying that the porn industry is entirely made by men for men employing women. I've heard it all but I get it, it helps you make the point that some elements of the porn industry are disgusting and while I agree, I'm not talking about these extremes. Somehow you will come back to that argument, completely igno…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:15 PM
2

You have a problem with big data and that's fair enough. Absolutely not the topic though. But you clearly have a misunderstanding of AI. If you ask AI to create someone who's hot, it's not going to randomly select a hot person and copy them. It learnt the features of hot people and drawing that from scratch, the same way our imagination works. What it was trained on and how it did it isn't relevant anymore. If I ask you to draw the perfect body type, you are breaching no one's consent even if th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:31 PM
-3

Not sure it'll be interesting to discuss this with you knowing you are with your partner all day and also seem to be religious. Not my "values".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:20 PM
0

And saving or sharing pictures of a fictive person is WAY different from saving or sharing pictures of a real person. https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en "probably made without the consent of whoever is being portrayed"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:53 PM
-6

Well this is ideal. The problem is women being anti-porn when they aren't even living together.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:28 PM
0

Are you going to say we all live in a simulation then, so nothing is real? Be serious haha. You haven't answered my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:24 PM
-1

Doesn't make sense, Most and Least are both fictional while you put the one involving real people in the middle. It's like you are comparing it to your format preference for normal content and you are just not respecting someone having an interest in anime: 1) You don't like anime 2) You like movies 3) You prefer books. But that's not the topic. Would it be the same ranking going back to the cheating subject?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:12 PM
0

So rank these again from least to most disturbing? Hentai, Erotica, Porn
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:54 PM
0

Erotica stories or your masturbating thoughts also come from training from past experiences with real people, without consent. Still no one's consent is breached. AI unless deepfake is nothing more than imagination. Imagination always based on previous events.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:49 PM
-4

What a weird take. To me Hentai are porn drawings AKA fictional but you find it less disturbing to watch real porn. AI also fictional and ok if not deep fake. So what's your take on erotica?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:42 PM
0

AI porn is an instant red flag and a dealbreaker [...] probably made without the consent of whoever is being portrayed OP explicitly said "porn of not actual people".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:38 PM
1

We are on the same page but it's a shame you feel the need to justify your point of view by saying you are in the hookup "category" or that it satisfies feminism. Why should two people who see themselves together for life, have less sex than those who don't? That isn't political, it's business between two persons. If anything it's natural and long-term people should even have more or earlier sex than the others. It's like some people here are saying long-term is for settling with less and aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:11 AM
1

For all my long-term relationships we had sex early, on the first, second, max third date. Why wait? We weren't following some rules. We just wanted to, naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:08 AM
2

Your argument falls into that category, "Low interest disguised as high standards". It's the same for "I would like to text longer before any first date" and there are many more examples along the line "taking it slow". In these situations, it's just another excuse. She's not into the guy but wants to keep him around for attention. To achieve that, she's going to make him believe it's the start of something special. The carrot and stick. This is nothing different from an employer promising you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:12 PM
0

Low interest disguised as high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:57 PM
3

Huh? OP is a woman who seems to think like you, for sure you are proving yourself right? Can we please a bit of logic in the debates, or is this rage bait? Are you also saying that when you want to, you don't make men who aren't husband material wait as long as you are attracted? Does it mean you are not actually attracted to the husband material ones which explains why you make them wait for sex? Are you just proving us right? Username checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:56 PM
7

Way to go! I lick on the first date
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:47 PM
4

This post screams r/WomenHatingOverForty
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 03:54 AM
24

I think you are watching too much social media. "Is it pink?" sounds more like a prank or social experiment. There are definitely differences but you can't compare cinema to normal people.
/r/seduction09/04/26 04:37 PM
–

"really like them", oh so cute, you have compassion for them? Haha, there is no way you are horny and you don't jump on a guy, trust me :)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 09:29 PM
–

Guys if you want to keep discussing with a woman who tells you she didn't have a good first feeling about you, keep going if that's your kind of thing. But let me tell you how it will go. For the little story... once went to one of my ex-gf's house, met the parents. Well, the parents were there, but they weren't together anymore. At some point during these few months of my relationship with her, I heard from her that her dad always chased her mum extremely hard, but she didn't want him. My ex wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 09:20 PM
–

You have a point but there is certainly a difference between two people taking it slow together, and one trying to slow things down intentionally. Unless it's a clear signal "I like you so much that I want this to be meaningful, special and slow". Recently I saw a post in some dating sub where she had a first video call after chatting with a guy on a dating app. Following the call the guy sent her something like "That was nice we should meet blabla". She responded "I'm not convinced I like you y…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:40 PM
–

Yep, if it's not a clear yes it's a no ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:30 PM
–

I agree with "this" (OP, not you) and I don't expect or particularly want a woman to be anywhere close to a virgin. Your argument is that not rejecting a man means being serious, how does this make sense? You can absolutely reject a lot of guys while showing clear interest to a select few, rather than leading everyone on and still displaying slut vibes (yeah, if you don't reject most men, how can you not be closer to the slut you refer to? aha!). Basically you've turned it around, trying to say …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:18 PM
1

Again, charisma is part of good personality. You can show banter or charisma to everyone. But, I agree with the above comment, men fail initial filters with women only (sexual too soon, not reading signs, not planning, etc.). So yeah regarding your main post/view, it's true that banter should be better used as seduction to prove social skills. But it's obvious in a way, that good social skills will help when dating. Some specific personalities work especially well with dating. I can tell in adva…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:24 AM
0

Reject them before they reject you? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:37 AM
4

I'm proud I boosted her
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:59 AM
2

Could have led somewhere monogamous and committed AKA settling for less. Not anymore, it's not the way. In other words, it's a mistake to believe you are going to have a drama-free relationship with the shy structured woman who lacks confidence. It's going to come back at you with jealousy and mind games, and it starts with using sex in a controlling way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:41 AM
6

Not at all. I'm not interested in people's history and body count. Don't wanna hear it. And I know for a fact that sex on the first or second date is great and leads to committed monogamous relationships more than no sex dates does. Why? Because man interested, woman interested. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:35 AM
0

Why do you bring up convinced like that? Unrelated. If anything the manipulation comes from someone who's making you wait and stringing you along. It's obvious to see a woman who's making you wait and isn't interested (OP's topic btw) but wants to feel better about herself by rejecting some guys. You all aren't going to make me believe that this is "for the best" and that "some people are like that", I know asexuals exist thanks, but they are a minority we shouldn't consider in this general deba…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:26 AM
0

That's not an assumption... we all want sex including quick sex (yeah, you don't need any commitment to masturbate tonight). Doesn't mean it has to be with someone meaningless. Delaying sex is just pretending. A guy is going to pretend he doesn't need it early just to get it. A woman is going to delay it just to pretend she's not easy. Interestingly when the guy doesn't mention sex at all, she'll be the one bringing it up and jumping on you. Mind games.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:18 AM
3

Never said I just wanted to fuck them. I'm saying your mind games are the result of your insecurities. So I avoid the seemingly-shy difficult women now. They are going to be controlling later anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:05 AM
5

Also my understanding: confusing = it's not worth it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:47 AM
-2

I'm 100% monogamous and tend to date one woman at a time (one woman is enough work), but you will never get into a committed relationship with me before we try any sex. Who is missing out? I think you are, as you are purposefully rejecting something we both want because you want to control the situation. For that reason I will reject you before you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:45 AM
1

they at least know if I like them or not Because you told them directly or because you think they think you like them because you push back sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:42 AM
3

"Low value woman" is your flair. A lot of women who are not confident in themselves will project it onto the man and try to make it more difficult for him to get some kind of confidence back. On average my best dates were with pretty, confident women. Worse dates with... the least confident of them, because they thought "He just wants to fuck me" and made it difficult, as if they wanted to feel what's it's like to reject a man as a "high value" woman. Which is ironic when a very confident woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:34 AM
15

Not much to debate here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:24 AM
3

r/ItHurtsGirlsToo
/r/MensRights17/03/26 09:56 PM
2

The content I read/watch has never been from the manosphere although most people would jump to the conclusion it is. And yes it has obviously helped. Women certainly like a guy who's confident and leads. That's not manipulation or anything like that, just good for a guy to work on himself and understand the patterns. I don't feel like answering all of your questions but just wanted to point that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:42 AM
1

Wow
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:41 AM
-2

Women are the first to invite communication with men they are not romantically interested in, because they struggle to let them know it's actually a "no" firmly. A lot of men don't know what to think of mixed signals so they'll keep the positive things in mind. Dodging therapy? As if therapy was easily accessible. Isn't this stuff pretty expensive? Going after women who are already taken? Same as first point, women in LTRs shouldn't even find themselves in a scenario where some random guy gets a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:10 PM
3

I feel for Indian men, when I regularly see on r/bumbleIndia women with a 6 feet requirement. It doesn't make any sense knowing Indian people are much smaller on average compared to most Western countries.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 11:31 PM
3

How long did the flashlights last?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:50 PM
1

It's still not the point of the post. I also tend to believe that a big age difference is going to be weird or surprising. Everyone notice these things, but people are allowed to think and believe, it's okay and it's not a problem. So yeah you are scared to discuss the elephant in the room. We are talking about someone, an older feminist woman in this case, going to a couple to warn the woman that she likely is with a predator and needs to do something about it. What do you think about that?
/r/MensRights11/10/25 10:16 PM
1

You can assume silently but these people did more than that, so it's clearly not about simply assuming. Your comment sounds like you are downplaying the issue whether on purpose or not.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:30 PM
2

How is this relevant, no one said assuming is a problem here.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:08 PM
137

Unrelated to age, but at a music event I've once been asked by a group of girls to leave a girl alone. Well, she's my girlfriend you dumbass. Clearly they were not enjoying their own time / looked anxious and had to project it on a man.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 12:45 PM
1

So are shit tests. Women don't test men they like.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 07:19 AM
2

It amazes me how a couple who know each other better than anyone else can fail to clearly communicate whether sex should stop or continue, yet strangers on the internet who know nothing about them or the situation feel confident deciding whether it was rape or not. I actually believe some of these reddit posts are unrealistic and created by some groups just to widen the perceived definition of rape. Yes sex can hurt sometimes, even for men. Does it mean it's rape if it doesn't stop? Not the teet…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 08:50 PM
5

Desire to tell a story, start a drama, have something going on in their lives even if negative, eat someone's energy, feel alive.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 01:14 PM
2

It's best to ignore them, particularly when these subs don't allow for other views which makes us feel like we only have to endure and stfu. Still if you are interested in discussing these topics, there is r/PurplePillDebate where arguing in a civil way is invited. I like this sub cos I always try to see everyone's point of view, as in it's never someone is fully right or wrong, there is a balance, might be 20% right 80% wrong.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 08:23 PM
6

I love it when guys aren't rushing or demanding sex right away. If a guy demands sex by a certain date How about a guy who is not rushing or demanding it, but at the same time isn't rejecting her or being vocal about setting a sex schedule? To me, OP and a guy who's rushing it, are the same thing. It's sex "their own way".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:37 PM
0

I think you are being dishonest and playing some kind of game. Simple proof is that you are saying that you will be the one "going for sex" after making her wait. Yet you are making it sound like you "are listening to women's needs". If you were truly patient, you would wait for her to make a move. If she likes you, she will. As for many things in relationships, I've learnt that guys need to be ready when women are ready. That could be for sex just as well as romance ("what are we?"). This is pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:27 PM
1

Mainly when you have to over-think what her texts mean.
/r/seduction03/06/25 09:50 PM
102

Also if she leaves you confused: she's not into you. It's a feeling that you learn with experience, but a very good indicator that you shouldn't lose more time with her.
/r/seduction03/06/25 04:47 PM
2

Haha — fair enough! But seriously, I'm here to help however you want. Want to roast the list, analyze it, or flip the questions around?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:20 AM
0

Yes for a subset of people it doesn't make the advice worthless but it also makes it obvious. Obviously if you already live in the "cool area" this is where you will invite her, where else? Boring area?
/r/seduction02/06/25 11:44 PM
3

This won't work unless you live central or date women who don't mind a player. I agree however that the place you choose should be closer to yours than hers.
/r/seduction02/06/25 11:38 PM
5

Would you date a man who's slept with 20+ people? — Yes Would you date a man who always has a messy room? — Yes Would you date a man who's a farmer for a living? — Yes Would you date a man who is 5 years younger than you? — No Would you date a man who's gone to prison for 5+ years? — No Would you date a man who is on the autism spectrum? — Yes Would you date a man who is on the sex offenders registry? — No Would you date a man who lost his virginity to a prostitute? — Yes Would you date a man wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 10:59 PM
7

Here’s your merged list with the answers inserted next to each question: Would you date a man who uses marijuana at least once a month? — Yes Would you date a man who considers himself to be a devout Christian? — No Would you date a man who dislikes physical exercise? — Maybe Would you date a man who doesn't believe that gay marriage should be legal? — No Would you date a man who believes that abortion should be illegal? — No Would you date a man who watches porn at least 3x a week? — Yes Would …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 10:58 PM
1

Oh in the US, ok
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:32 PM
1

Huh, 1% muslim?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:20 PM
0

I think you are rationalising the fact you are attracted to men that other women validated. Other than that it doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 12:38 PM
26

I think there is a well-known study that says your attractiveness increases when surrounded by attractive people. But I don't think it works on dating apps.
/r/seduction22/05/25 09:46 PM
3

You do absolutely nothing until she breaks up and comes back to you. In the meantime she would only use you to start drama with her bf and show him she has value.
/r/seduction14/05/25 05:07 PM
107

You sound like you are rushing it and expecting immediate results. That doesn't work with women, they detect that. Slow down and be patient!
/r/seduction07/05/25 10:04 PM
8

So men are easily replaceable with men who are easily replaceable? Interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 06:04 PM
3

I don't mind a woman more successful than me but I feel like a successful woman would want a man more successful than her. This comes down to women wanting to get successful for themselves, not to provide for a man. But I doubt it's about intimidation or any kind of aggressiveness. Met very successful women (jobs at Google, DeepMind) who were lovely but had very high expectations, which makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:36 AM
1

Sometimes it looks like he phrases things to look smart rather than to be understood. I don't follow everything he says and I don't feel like studying him, but yeah I wouldn't be surprised if what he says was full of contradictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 01:12 AM
1

True, not meaning everything in nature is desirable or easy, I'm saying that when something feels natural, it flows more easily, it just aligns, takes less force. Back to OP's point, it's good to be aware of that and to trust our instincts in a way. Starting from that it doesn't prevent using unnatural approaches like cold-approaching in public or dating apps to maximize results. It's still important to remember that in this process, nature always comes back and wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:43 AM
0

Natural rhymes with easy. And not just easier for men, easier for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:31 PM
1

If only there were examples of males having to attract females in the animal kingdom… This is the point, attract. You can attract them without doing the first move.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:25 PM
2

I don't think this is OP's point. The point is women should show signs first, at all stages in life. Then obviously the man will lead and ask them out on a date. Then same for sex, women love to bring up sex, and they will show it to you by getting closer to you. Exclusivity talk? I will probably wait for you to bring it up, unless you wait 6 months obviously and I should spend my time somewhere else. Kids? I'm not bringing this up until you do, and I know you will because your body can make bab…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:21 PM
3

In the meantime you reject men who love-bomb you because they don't make you feel safe. So what is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:08 PM
1

That's the point. They have what it needs to be noticed and the rest follows. The reason male animals fight is so female animals know where to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:06 PM
1

You're so on point man, same for me. I'm just going to share my real first relationship example as it's significant. She came to get my number at the exit of a nightclub when I was about to leave. She then said she looked at me all night and was worried I looked at her friends and not just her. I did look at her also but if I had been a prick asking for random women's numbers all night, she wouldn't have thought the same of me. A number she got herself certainly doesn't have the same meaning as …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:03 PM
1

Yes, this goes well with the fact that everything is easier when it's their idea (sex, love, exclusivity, texting, sexting, availability, picking a day, etc.). When it's not, they over-think. However a guy needs to be ready when she's enthusiastic about you. Means being ready to go for her and lead by making her feel understood and protected, so she continues to chase you. If a girl likes you, she will show signs of interest first. In real-life that means women going/staying in your field of vie…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:49 PM
5

Just came across this thread where people (women?) tend to recommend OP to go along with the friendship https://np.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/1k4vjbr/how_to_say_lets_connect_on_linkedin_and_youre_meh/ The inconsistency of behaviours/expectations is staggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:57 AM
4

For sure men need to detect the signs better. Only experience can help with this you are totally right. Also agree that women don't do this intentionally. I believe it's more biological and a safety mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:43 PM
-1

I really don't understand how you came with this thread if mainly referring to OLD. OLD either leads to a date (romantic interest) or no date (that's not even friendship). Something tells me you are not going on that many dates and you are more spending time at home writing anti-men posts on reddit. Really not surprised to see I had already downvoted your other hateful-sounding post "A lot of promiscuous men are good at manipulating women and don't care about their feelings, and that's why they'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:36 PM
6

Yeah women have a talent to send mixed signals and lead men on. It's ironic knowing this post apparently depicts men who aren't direct enough, when it can be the lack of directness from women that creates this situation in the first place. Women want to friend-zone men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:24 PM
11

Not exactly sure what situation you're referring to or how you define the friend-zone. As far as I know, I don’t think most guys aim to be friends with women just to sleep with them. One case where a guy might be into someone but not make a move is when they meet in group settings. Group dynamics can be tricky, and sometimes it's better not to do anything if it might affect the whole vibe. In that case, it’s not manipulation or anything, more just about not forcing things and maybe giving it tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:04 PM
5

A good start would be dismantling r/WomenDatingOverForty, while the sub name sounds legit, it hides the most hateful/shocking forum on the internet I have ever seen and seems to grow in popularity. Some of their rules: Women only. This isn't the place for the male perspective, the rest of reddit does that just fine This is not the place for "Not All Men." Go play Devil's Advocate somewhere else Some of their recent threads: what is an average man? an actual fake news: Bumble and other dating app…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:45 AM
5

Exactly. This is like saying all <insert ethnicity> are terrorists or thieves. Which obviously isn't part of feminists' (or anyone else's) agenda. So it shows the hypocrisy either way: either they are not only sexist but also racist, or they don't actually believe in allmen themselves but still push for it (hate/sexism as well).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 10:26 AM
1

Yeah! Probably healthy too, not like some soda. Then it looks "cool" and it becomes entirely up to you if you can be social/fun with it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:51 AM
1

No. A guy might fantasize about the MILF stuff, and do it once for experience. But older women still want a love story, the one they didn't have. No reason for men to go for it unless they have mommy issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:38 AM
1

Not really. It's more that older women tend to become more self-aware, and often realize they miss what they once played hard to get for. But all that does show that when young, it's always easier to blame men, and later realise "it wasn't that bad". Again what's interesting is that apparently OP is young (32f) and already understands/expects that as she recommends young men would match well with mature women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 05:33 PM
19

You can go for mocktails. I have a few friends who don't drink and still go for 0% beers with us, go to parties, or go on dates in the evening in actual bars.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:50 PM
1

Yeah it's for you =) You know, solving self-contradictions!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:36 PM
-1

So you confirm that a coffee date isn't fun, then you make it a must to go for a boring coffee (commonly associated with the workplace) for reasons happening only in your head. If evening drinks is something you actually like but won't accept because you are too rigid and controlling, then you are missing out on a lot of people who are fun and trustworthy. I think you need to look within and resolve your trust issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:20 PM
3

It shows they easily blame men for their own problems. It's about filtering those.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:54 PM
6

I find it interesting that OP believes that men, no matter their age, would match better with "(emotionally) mature women". As if younger women have been delusional, dramatic and problematic all along. Proof that men should be looking for young but emotionally mature women harder, instead of settling for less.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:31 AM
2

Exactly! They will require just as much attention and will still be dramatic. You will just look like a clown bringing her to any of your social events.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:16 AM
3

b) will jump on TikTok and publicly accuse you of being an asshole when things don't work out I mean, you should have thought about that earlier, kinda too late now. Thanks for pointing out that some younger women can be difficult in that way. However the goal for men is to find women their age who won't add this drama to their life. Nice try suggesting younger men to settle for less though. There are basically no downsides for the man to dating older women I once got close to my neighbour, a 48…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter