kiblick Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-9	Funny how that works... There's so many incorrect things about this statement that I fear this sub is turning alt right. First off, the right to abortion is not murder. It's a person making a medical decision about their body. I get that you may be half Incel and half butt hurt the one girl that said yes left you. So, choosing what you do with your body is one thing, that's it. Now back to comparing apples and oranges. If a self sustaining child is born, both of us creators are responsible bc the court looks at the bes…	/r/MensRights	20/05/19 01:51 AM
3	Apparently mainstream media is sympathetic if you are a woman The conversation should be, the government is denying a USA citizen their right to due process. I don't care if she's locked up for life, but as an American she has the right to go before a court. Can someone tell me when was the last time the federal government banished someone (serious question)?	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/02/19 02:05 PM
0	Father arrested for not paying child support, because he was a hostage for 5 months This is an extreme example and isn't cited correctly. The problem actually boils down to. . Was he's employer still paying him, providing legal representation during he's capture and so on. Modifying child support isn't that hard if your circumstances change. The court, I'm assuming didn't know of he's circumstances when they issued the warrant (the state (legislative branch) just files paperwork based on what their computer says, and once that judicial warrant is issued, the executive branch, t…	/r/MensRights	19/09/18 06:35 PM
5	Man will have to pay child support sfter his ex forged a signature to release frozen embryo from IVF clinic. His claim of negligence against the clinic has been denied... Sue her for fraud	/r/MensRights	06/10/17 02:37 PM
1	Good News. The guy who hooked up with a girl who lied about her age has been removed from the sex offenders registry. I would sue her for fraud.	/r/MensRights	20/09/15 04:47 PM
1	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." It's Dr. Kiblick esq.....God!	/r/MensRights	11/07/15 02:37 PM
0	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." *fucking idiot. And it's not a phd, it's a jd; juris doctorate.	/r/MensRights	11/07/15 08:32 AM
-1	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." You mock but have yet to provide one piece of evidence you are correct. Besides talking about laws that do not directly deal with, what evidence do you have. You are a fucking moron and I don't care what you think.	/r/MensRights	11/07/15 08:21 AM
-5	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." I have a doctorate in law you find dumbass. You can't even say anything that makes sense. Yes I'm familiar with work laws and such. The fact that you think violence while on the clock when it is not absolutely necessary is protected some how by some law you can't name only illustrates to me that you have a world view, albeit incorrect, that this guy can sue for wrongful fire. Find whatever law you are talking about. I know can't because it doesn't exist. Moreover, your Canadian, wtf do you know …	/r/MensRights	10/07/15 10:49 PM
-5	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." You are incorrect. I'm done wasting my time. Have fun believing whatever you want. You are incorrect.	/r/MensRights	10/07/15 07:50 PM
-11	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." Nda clauses and non compete clauses are completely different. I'll give you a very simple example. It's legal to wear a purple shirt in all of the USA, but if you work at Wal-Mart you must wear a blue one. P gets fired for wearing purple shirt. All tho legal it's not a wrongful fire. You're argument starts with a huge fallacy, you state that it's a wrongful fire in the beginning. If you are going to start with a conclusion, you must follow with the rule that states it, and then an analysis of it…	/r/MensRights	10/07/15 07:42 PM
-8	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." You are incorrect. It's not a wrongful fire if the bylaws of the company state you can vee fired for such. Happens all the time. 7/11 employee kills robber and gets fired bc the contract of employment stated no employee can carry a weapon to work or use violence. It's not a wrongful fire if you violate the contract you are hired under. Employee breached employment contract.	/r/MensRights	10/07/15 06:45 PM
1	Employee escorted off premises. Returns (trespassing) to assault manager. Manager finally has to throw a punch back in self-defense. The whole internet is "OMG hit a woman." Every news story, title and lead is "BIG MAN HITS little woman." I agree with you but for different reasons. You press charges to make your defense of yourself more legitimate.	/r/MensRights	10/07/15 06:41 PM
2	Am I off base? While I agree "revenge porn" should probably be illegal, I can't help feeling like it's going to be yet another large weapon in the ammo box for false accusers. I would like to see what evidence was used... What if the pics were posted while they dated, from what computer and so on. I like the law idea but I agree with your concerns. Here is the statute in California http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_2601-2650/ab_2643_bill_20140221_introduced.htm	/r/MensRights	03/12/14 04:52 PM
2	Free speech is so last century. Today’s students want the ‘right to be comfortable’ People want the right to not be offended. That blows my mind! If you are not offended all the time you are not in a free society. Wtf, you want to live in "The Giver" no thanks. I love my freedoms. Great post, which is odd because I generally don't agree with this sub too often.	/r/TheRedPill	24/11/14 08:05 PM