TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kickina Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by kickina on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The data they give suggests both an attractiveness and status effect though. Did the authors even write the abstract? Further, you’d get an even larger impact of physical attractiveness and possibly status if you increased the variance in these traits. The authors mention this as the ‘threshold’ theory.
/r/BlackPillScience01/12/21 01:36 AM
1

The rating system by which females perceive men can affect how much variance in romantic interest is explained by physical attractiveness. I don’t want to adjudicate the way men are rated, but if we accept momentarily the common manosphere hypothesis of 80/20, or 90/10 - then we have a system of accelerated attraction, not linear. A male’s attractiveness can go up very little if at all when he rises from 50th to 60th percentile, but dramatically when he goes from 80th to 90th. If you follow the …
/r/BlackPillScience09/07/21 09:04 PM
1

The correlation between group rated attractiveness of men and romantic liking was .36 in the computer dance study. It’s important to note that this is not a correlation between the man’s attractiveness to the female on the date and this female’s romantic interest in him. The study authors also express some skepticism regarding their group rating scores, there were only 4 raters, and they had to make ratings very quickly (1-2 seconds). This .36 should be considered a floor, the actual importance …
/r/BlackPillScience01/07/21 12:10 AM
3

This study reports almost no effect. Why are we trying to meme height into significance?
/r/BlackPillScience22/03/21 06:41 AM
5

Scientific research imitates the incelosphere circa 2014, they’ll catch up. Give them time.
/r/BlackPillScience20/03/21 05:37 AM
3

The first study does not seem to report a finding of note as there is no obvious effect of confidence on romantic desirability. If you take a look at the data, all three groups scored quite close to each other on perceived confidence, but one of the groups was rated much higher on romantic desirability than the others. This is very odd, you would expect the groups to vary less in romantic desirability than perceived confidence if confidence is a subset of romantic desirability because other thin…
/r/BlackPillScience26/01/21 12:25 AM
1

No, but they did three different studies and all three seem to suggest a positive effect of a tutorial that boosts ‘confidence.’ This seems to guard against the lack of control, but you never know I suppose.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/21 04:53 PM
3

Okay I read the study. The most important limitation is probably the lack of attempt to make sure the studied groups didn’t differ in pre-existing desirability. This could be problematic given the sample sizes, but I don’t know. I suspect the effect is real though. I think it’s plausible that training someone how to navigate social interaction will yield favorable results. This does not mean ‘confidence’ is attractive, only effective. I do not know how I would characterize the magnitude of the e…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/21 04:41 PM
4

What is the magnitude of the effect, for context, being attractive (versus normal) on Tinder seems to increase the probability of a female liking your profile by about 2,500%
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/21 03:43 PM
9

I think it’s possible women just don’t care much about income in this sample or in general, thus overstating the importance of height but seeming to preserve the idea that below average height hurts a lot but above average height helps only a little.
/r/BlackPillScience31/12/20 12:53 AM
1

I would like to know how the ratings distribution of individuals generally plays out. It's certainly the case there could be widespread variations in what people find attractive, yet you still observe a dramatic reduction in the proportion of females that are attracted to a man as his group rated attractiveness declines. If the population of ratings for individuals generally have a skew to the right, it seems like this tapering would be less dramatic than if the ratings of individuals were norma…
/r/BlackPillScience29/12/20 11:45 AM
1

I don’t subscribe to the idea that a man won’t be in a relationship if he isn’t physically attractive, usually. Most men will have sex as well. Physical attributes could affect the amount which men engage in sexual activity. This seems to have been observed in this study. Height had little effect beyond a well below average threshold, but BMI managed to predict sexual partner count. The authors reference material that concludes muscular men have more sexual partners, as has already been quoted.
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/20 04:17 PM
1

What are you requesting evidence of in particular?
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/20 03:59 PM
1

I’m late to the party, but it’s perceived bodily strength not actual bodily strength that so strongly explains bodily attractiveness.
/r/BlackPillScience16/11/20 09:38 AM
2

IF the face was sufficiently feminine to begin with. Average masculinity was as attractive as greatly increased masculinity in this study.
/r/BlackPillScience12/11/20 10:03 AM
2

The study suggests that beards are effective. I don’t think much else of value is suggested. I suppose it might be valuable to know that taking a typical face and making it more masculine does not increase attractiveness; but this should surprise no one at this point. There’s a lot going on with facial attractiveness that isn’t captured by a one dimensional axis of masculinity.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 08:35 AM
4

https://www.pnas.org/content/110/17/6925 This study compared the contribution to overall attractiveness of three traits. Height did not explain much of the variance. However, as you seem to allude to, there is an interesting pattern in this data. The relationship between height and overall attractiveness is not linear; it is one of diminishing returns. So, height could still have a substantial negative effect on overall attractiveness. Which is to say being short is unattractive, but there wasn’…
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/20 10:10 PM
6

What I mean to say is that this study provides no compelling evidence that a typical height is a barrier to being very attractive as a male. Which I would argue is distinct from other characteristics - a male can’t have a typical face and be very attractive.
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/20 05:38 AM
6

A female’s ideal height is not really important compared to what she’ll settle for. This study gives no insight to how important height is compared to other characteristics. In practice, a female will have to make decisions and prioritize certain traits. Another study on the front page here indicates that females liked taller males, but that this preference was muted in comparison to the female preference for a higher shoulder / hip ratio - so height ended up explaining little of the variance in…
/r/BlackPillScience23/04/20 09:26 AM
2

Yes. Volume is distinct from mass so VHI will be different from BMI . Volume is how much space is occupied, where mass is how much matter is in an object, analogous to weight on Earth I suppose. This would seem to explain why VHI explains attractiveness to a greater extent than BMI, low weight individuals can occupy more space than a higher weight individual and vice versa. Having said that, BMI was strongly correlated with attractiveness, and because the VHI measurement did not include the head…
/r/BlackPillScience18/04/20 01:19 AM
6

Those lyrics are absolutely phenomenal, just the first two lines are so cogent
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 06:24 PM
1

She doesn’t need to say she was beaten. Her willingly going back to a hotel room will not be seen as evidence of consent because she can withdraw consent at any time. She certainly does not need to say she woke up blacked out.
/r/MGTOW09/01/20 08:15 PM
2

That's just how you play the game. Do what it takes to win.
/r/MGTOW16/11/19 07:58 PM
5

Shoulder to hip ratio, what the study analyzed, was massively more important than height and penis size combined. Women definitely cared about height and penis size, but there were diminishing returns once those traits neared average, and a tall man was only ever so slightly more attractive than an average height man. From the study "A model using only linear and quadratic selection on the shoulder-to-hip ratio accounted for 79.6% of variation in relative attractiveness scores... Each trait (hei…
/r/BlackPillScience12/11/19 11:50 AM
2

Instead of top 50 / bottom 50, I wish they would have done top 10, bottom 90 in their 'moderator analysis.' Would have been more interesting. Of course, anyone who's on this subreddit should know that a slightly higher rater agreement among men does not mean anything significant in terms of rater agreement in the real world. Unless, of course, one wants to challenge the idea that women are attracted to a much narrower portion of the opposite sex.
/r/BlackPillScience04/11/19 01:51 PM
3

I've always been skeptical of more than a minor 'ovulatory shift.'
/r/BlackPillScience02/11/19 08:41 PM
1

That place strikes me as an advocacy platform for polygamy.
/r/MGTOW27/10/19 07:21 AM
1

The prosecution alleges the victim was sitting on the couch, the defense claims the victim was standing and walking towards the defendant when she fired. It is unclear in what position and where the victim was actually shot in the apartment. The defendant was able to open the door because of a problem with the door's locking mechanism. The defendant inserted her own key, but missed or did not realize the significance of the light turning red. The prosecution alleges she missed other signs the ap…
/r/MGTOW29/09/19 06:19 PM
1

A prosecutor can bring a case on an accusation alone. They can then threaten an innocent defendant with lengthy sentences if they don’t take a plea. Juries convict on eyewitness testimony. Why this isn’t ‘hard evidence’ to you is strange. Google Brian Banks. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pawd.249840/gov.uscourts.pawd.249840.1.0_1.pdf Another interesting case
/r/MGTOW20/03/19 05:18 PM
2

This isn’t true to my knowledge, men with higher income are more likely to be married
/r/MGTOW14/03/19 04:55 PM
3

Some drugs are more euphoric, but the same idea applies there as well
/r/MGTOW25/11/18 05:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter