TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kieuk Archive

View 1 post and 53 comments by kieuk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I know
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:31 AM
5

If that's really how you think... fuck.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:38 AM
4

I know - I was being snarky. I was telling you that you were just as bad.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:48 PM
6

Is that second paragraph supposed to be a description of feminists? If so, are you really sinking that low? How would you like it if it was common practice for feminists to mock us by saying we are all dependent on our parents living in the basement playing video games in our fedoras?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:42 PM
1

Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:54 PM
3

And with that, you lost my empathy.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:53 PM
37

I don't understand this infographic, sorry. When for example it gives 90%/10% for fatherless homeless/runaways, does that mean: a) 90% of homeless/runaways are fatherless and 10% motherless? 100% are missing a parent? b) 90% of fatherless people are homeless/runaways (seems unlikely), and 10% of motherless people? c) something else?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:51 AM
-1

what do grades have to do with wages? Better qualifications are generally considered more desirable. I would also be willing to bet that there is a correlation between work-ethic and grades, and also one between expertise and grades. That book looks really interesting! But I should really really go now, it being 4am and all...
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:07 AM
1

"oh and here is American Association of University Witches' salary calculator that shows women earn more than men when equality arrives, seriously who'd think otherwise?" in one major, for one occupation, by 5 percentage points. There is variation! Those videos should be followed up by actually reading studies about it.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:51 AM
1

The blind screen was used with all applicants, so it was a fair test. "If men play better with an audience": women don't also play better with an audience? I'm not following at all. I thought that "When blind tests like SAT don't give females better scores, it shows bias against women" would be quite an unusual thing to claim, and therefore a strawman. Perhaps it isn't. Anyway I personally would say that if, all other things being equal, men performed worse in SAT tests then women, that would be…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:36 AM
-4

Women don't just go to college more: they do better when they are there. But the gender gap applies regardless of the level of education you have. It's not just among college-educated people that men, generally, are paid more for the same work.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:25 AM
3

I can't post more often than once every 8 minutes or whatever so bear with me. Also it's 3am so I really should put a stop to all this... Yes, women do more part-time work, this is accounted for in all the studies I've been looking at. They aim to compare equivalent men and women.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:14 AM
0

The paper said that using a blind screen accounts for at least 25% of the increase (a significant amount that should not be ignored, by the way!). I would guess that the remaining 75% increase over the decades in the number of women in orchestras came from increasingly positive attitudes towards women, resulting in an increase in women applying for these kinds of jobs and indeed starting down that career path in the first place. In fact screen tests are not completely blind in the end - you can …
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:02 AM
2

before you keep looking for studies, try looking for studies that show discrimination against men. Found some - there is plenty of discrimination against men in the kinds of employment that you might expect: traditionally/stereotypically female jobs go to equally qualified women more than men. Obviously this is a problem. It is a different problem from the one I am trying to illustrate: women and men being paid less for the same work. Some traditionally female jobs often actually do pay women mo…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:49 AM
1

Aha, I see someone is going through all my comments downvoting them indiscriminately!
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:19 AM
3

I'm always surprised to see my views, which I think are pretty "out there" for an MRA, in that I also identify as a feminist, get upvotes here. Either there are some sympathetic lurkers who are quieter than the rest, or people are using upvotes and downvotes the way they were intended, since I always try to contribute usefully to discussions.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:45 AM
0

Thanks, I'll try
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:32 AM
2

I was just surprised because women are generally more into the gender issue stuff.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:24 AM
6

Adding more studies as I find them. Two studies showing that having women at senior positions improves the performance of companies. I can think of two explanations for this: women are better than men at stuff, or women are being disproportionately excluded from promotion relative to their ability, damaging the company. Of course, I think the latter is much more likely. 1: (http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-corporate-performance-and-womens-representation-boards) Companies with the mo…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:19 AM
0

Watching this all I see is "he said she said". So, I figured, I'd look at some studies. (By the way, I cannot believe that as long ago as 1981 (or more probably the late 1970's when the data was collected) no employers were racist, let alone sexist. This video is an embarrassment to this subreddit. I do wonder, when do anti-feminist MRAs think patriarchy disappeared? And racism? And is the party line really that these are completely solved issues?) There are numerous studies showing that discrim…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:02 AM
1

What of Daniel Dennett would you like me to read?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:33 PM
2

Well, no, I wasn't. (Also this was one woman.)
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:30 PM
0

Oh right. Well, you know, sexist people exist, so, not knowing you, I took your comment at face value.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:29 PM
0

I have been raped and physically and verbally abused and i find the trigger warning silly. I'm sorry for your experience but this is merely anecdotal evidence - lots of other people do ask for trigger warnings. Im sorry if this sounds harsh to anyone but i find it kind of pathetic if what you wrote would trigger anyone. That does sound quite harsh, to judge someone for being damaged by the power of words. And in any case, I don't think it's so unreasonable to think that it is possible that a rea…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:29 PM
5

As a man, I think that is patronising and sexist towards women.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:16 PM
0

I think we can allow these people online if we give them warnings when something potentially harmful to them is discussed. That's the point of the warnings, so that they can navigate some parts of the internet more safely rather than being forced to avoid the internet wholesale.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:34 PM
8

That sounds awful.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:09 PM
2

I don't understand the relevance of your final sentence. Unless perhaps you mean to imply that, because women and men have the same value, the world is equally unfair towards each group?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:04 PM
5

Maybe they've just been to a psychiatrist and want some downtime? I use trigger warnings because I know victims say they are helpful for them and I want to avoid unnecessary suffering. It takes literally ten seconds to write, one second to skim, and makes the world a little easier and safer. It is ignorant to characterize the avoided reaction as 'a neurotic breakdown'. These things can be subtle, insidious. To be perfectly honest, given a choice between rape culture (rape isn't so common, victim…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 10:49 AM
0

I know I should have stood up to them and felt bad when I didn't. About trigger warnings: victims say that they want warning about these things and I, being ignorant of their experiences, see no reason to disbelieve them.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 10:39 AM
1

Yeah. So the solution is, let everyone play who wants to, and if there are enough people for more than one team, divide it up by ability.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:40 AM
5

I don't think it's that black and white. Feminism is a term referring to loads of different views under the banner of a single ideology, you can agree with some of it and disagree with other bits.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:24 AM
20

Basically, I don't think he has 'yellow fever', I think he has a fixation disorder with Asian women and how he idealizes them in his own mind. That is what 'yellow fever' means, I believe.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:13 AM
2

She doesn't want to text him first because she is aware that loads of people think that men have to ask women out and get weirded out by the opposite.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:49 AM
5

...did you just say men should be in control of the thermostat??
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:24 AM
0

I need anti-feminism because I'm tired of people thinking we need thought police just because they're not comfortable dealing with the unfortunate ramifications and repercussions of their own lifestyle choices. So, trying to change people's perceptions is thought policing? Isn't changing people's perceptions the aim of MRAs too? "the unfortunate ramifications and repercussions of their own lifestyle choices" I can't read this any other way than 'if you have too much sex you deserve any consequen…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:13 AM
1

Voting is nice and it is optional, fighting in a war generally isn't either of those things.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 10:51 PM
3

It's rambling, cobbled-together soundbites of misogynistic claptrap.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:56 AM
6

It's actually a reference to when a guy's penis got chopped off and some women laughed about it on TV.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:45 AM
3

I grant you that that is weird, to say the least. However that has no bearing on the reasons behind the countless, saner lesbians' sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:14 PM
3

what are you saying? her lesbianism is a political statement?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:15 PM
2

Is it difficult?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:12 PM
-2

The fact that some women enjoy fantasising about non-consensual activities does not mean that all women, or even those same women, would like all, or even any, non-consensual activities. Like as a child I enjoyed stories where the character got eaten, didn't mean I wanted to get eaten.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:33 PM
-1

But it's impossible to define any term.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:23 PM
0

Well that's wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:43 PM
-2

Deigning to reply to a troll, hope this is the right decision. Patriarchy doesn't strip women of power, just some power. Complicit women are just as blameless as complicit men. (That is, to some extent blameless.) eta: I think it's interesting that you say 'girl' writes what. Would the male equivalent be 'boy writes what'? I suspect it would be man. There's just some language for you to think about.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:20 PM
0

This gets nine points, so it must have some weight behind it, whether true or not - I'd be interested to see this 'demonstrable' thing demonstrated as it is alien to my experience.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:25 PM
-6

I don't think anyone would say that women have no power at all. Most of them can brush their teeth, make Facebook accounts, walk down the road, etc. The fact that some men don't work to remove it makes them partly to blame, but there's no reason to think that they are alone in not working to remove it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:15 PM
-9

I don't follow the logic in your third sentence. Feminists often make reference to women who have 'internalised' misogyny or patriarchy, thereby putting at least some of the blame for patriarchy on those women who perpetuate it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:43 PM
-13

I hated that article for that reason... but that very same article stated that feminism tries to fight against it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:27 PM
-35

It seems I read the article in a different way to some people here. I thought the author was criticising the term 'man flu', not using it to belittle men. I still think that feminist women would be the women least likely to use the term 'man flu'. Thirdly. As I understand it, the term patriarchy doesn't lay the blame at the feet of men. Rather it refers to the idea that men are generally at an advantage over women, due to unfortunate facts about our society.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:13 PM
3

I don't get the joke, sorry. Could someone possibly explain for me?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:06 PM
-55

Where have you got this idea that it's used by feminists? Feminism doesn't like misandry either, and perceives it as a manifestation (or MANifestation) of patriarchy - so it makes no sense to suggest that they would mock men for not conforming to male gender roles. Unfounded anti-feminism brings nothing useful to the world.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter