| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Did you ever have sex with someone without her explicitly, verbally agreeing to it? Sorry, but you're a rapist.You can point out the ridiculousness of the law without being an ass about it. Catch more flies with honey than a fire. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 10:58 AM |
| -17 | Did you ever have sex with someone without her explicitly, verbally agreeing to it? Sorry, but you're a rapist.Because it's blatantly antagonistic. That whole paragraph exists to make people angry. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 03:30 AM |
| 4 | Wanted to share an example of sexism from my childhood.....Meanwhile, on 2xchromosomes, a woman has written the exact same passage, but about women. Oh wait, shit, did I let the secret out? As it turns out both men and women have the same complaints, but we keep holding on to little shit like this so we can never be equal. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 03:27 AM |
| 23 | Coworker sees nothing wrong with assaulting a client with a laser to the testicles for having an erection.Could? Should. Men's rights aside, that's just a grievous abuse of power, and I would go so far as to say deliberate malpractice. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 03:20 AM |
| 3 | People Are People - Let's Stop Saying "Among the 300 dead, there were 3 women and 2 children"The logic only makes sense when there is actually a solid chance of surviving without aid. In the case of the titanic, I don't think anyone who wasn't either on a life boat, or incredibly lucky survived. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 03:19 AM |
| 1 | The word "objectify" is really just ridiculous.Are you not a native English speaker? Because it's basic context. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 03:15 AM |
| 1 | The word "objectify" is really just ridiculous.If I say that "dogs are more loyal than cats", I am saying that "Dogs (In general) are more loyal that cats (In general)". As for referring to women....the original poster of this comment chain: You know those damn women, running errands, buying groceries, going to work. They're asking to be sexually objectified. And your response: Running errands with makeup on. Buying groceries while wearing a push-up bra. Going to work in high heels that make their arse stand out better. You are saying "Women… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 08:32 PM |
| 1 | The word "objectify" is really just ridiculous.Hardly. I am fully aware that some women dress up, but when you refer to "women" the most obvious assumption is that you mean "all women." I don't understand why you're taking such a hostile stance. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 05:16 PM |
| 4 | The word "objectify" is really just ridiculous.Er, no, I'm more referring to the fact that you seem to be under the impression that every woman always dresses up to do errands, all the time. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 02:43 PM |
| 3 | The word "objectify" is really just ridiculous.You're really starting to sound rape-y there. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 11:41 AM |
| 8 | The male sex toy revolutionNot too close though, leave room for jesus. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/12 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Anyone else notice this when being hit on by a gay man...Guy asks what consoles I play Obviously wants me | /r/seduction | 24/08/11 07:12 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter