kilgoretroutt Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... But unless they have a habit of doing that, then it's impossible to really know whether or not they had that intention from the beginning. It is pretty well established that what you described does take place, and since that is the case then it is up to the person who is being asked for a favor to determine what the true intentions of the other party are. That being said, I do find it sad that certain people will play on the loneliness of others in order to get what they want, but that is a real…	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 08:11 PM
0	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Are you saying that a person does not have the right to renege on a promise of sex?	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 07:33 PM
-1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... No, they say, "If you do this for me, I'll make it worth your while wink" In that case, you can't prove the intentions of the woman. Perhaps it is the mans fault for interpreting her words in that way. Perhaps she meant that she will buy him a coffee, and you can't prove otherwise unless she said outright that she would have sex with him.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 06:22 PM
0	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... That does not make it at all mandatory.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 05:56 PM
-5	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Obviously going up to someone and saying "if you do this for me, then I will have sex with you", that is wrong, but I have never seen that to be the case. I've never said that it's not wrong for a woman to do that, but if that's what she wants to do then she has every right to.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 05:26 PM
-2	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Taking advantage of anyone is wrong, I agree with that. But most of the cases of "friend zoning" that I have seen have been instances where one person willingly keeps trying to get something from another person, knowing full well that the other person does not share the same feelings.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 05:26 PM
-1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Why do you think that the reciprocation of favors is mandatory? It's definitely more courteous, but definitely not mandatory.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 05:15 PM
-5	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... It definitely goes both ways as you have said, but in either case it is not mandatory that favors are returned.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 05:04 PM
-6	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Even if someone was deliberately led to believe that performing a favor for someone would lead to sex, that doesn't mean that the other person ever has to deliver; perhaps they intended on following through, but changed their mind after the fact.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 04:48 PM
-2	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... But the idea of the "friend zone" is asinine to begin with. People should not expect sexual favors/ a relationship, just because they were nice and did something for another person.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 04:45 PM
-11	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... TIL that people think that doing favors for a woman entitles them to sex.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 04:26 PM