TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kill4sleep Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by kill4sleep on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the difference is, tubecrush isn't on reddit. also, tubecrush caters largely to the gay male population, as evidenced by its contributors. I have a problem with tubecrush too though. I think both men and women have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public (ie they shouldn't be illicitly photographed for fapping material or for people to sneer at, see people of wal-mart).
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:09 PM
2

I would say the gendered part of it is the response to the sexual liaison between Amanda Todd and a boy who was in a relationship. From what I've read, the boy received no flak for cheating on his girlfriend. I don't think his girlfriend even broke up with him, although he is far more culpable for cheating than the Todd was. Amanda Todd, on the other hand, received a beating for being a "homewrecker" and was left lying in a ditch. This event was arguably the catalyst for her suicide. The dispari…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:38 PM
1

tubecrush was started by a man and his (male) room mates. its main contributors are men. look through the posts--it's at least 70% men submitting these photos based off of user names. there is also a mechanism for removing photos, which was unavailable on r/creepshots. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/fashion/tubecrushnet-and-subwaycrushnet.html?_r=0 I think tubecrush is creepy as balls too, but perhaps you should do a little digging before blithely spouting that creepshots was okay because wom…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:24 PM
1

I frequent a variety of feminist, egalitarian, and men's rights subreddits. it's good to get a broad prospective. It seems a little shady that the women came forth en masse like this, since they're a group of friends and they're alleging old (unprovable) attacks from years past. I can believe that the alaska state troopers are shady, and prone to even more shadiness with a daughter of a trooper involved. However, Zeb does not look like an angel in all of this.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:19 PM
1

http://www.adn.com/2009/02/27/705309/man-facing-rape-charges-has-oregon.html http://juneauempire.com/stories/080609/reg_478367450.shtml (deemed competent to stand trial) he's also in a book about serial offenders (serial offenders: theory and practice by Kevin Borgeson, Kristen Kuehnle). "Karen McClintock, the Coos County district attorney who prosecuted Whisler's case in 1999, said Whisler was 15 years old when he was convicted of sodomy -- a charge that is defined to include oral sex -- sexual…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:46 PM
1

I think it's disingenuous at best to act as if being labelled a sex offender had no bearing on whether or not zeb stayed in oregon or went to alaska with his parents. not all juvenile records are sealed. obviously, this is one case were they were not sealed (especially in light of the fact that had he remained in oregon, he would have had to register as a sex offender). kids can be tried as adults. whether that is fair or not is an entirely different argument, however. it honestly doesn't sound …
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:19 PM
1

did nobody else notice the fact that zeb has a history of sexual assault and predation dating from when he was 13? I did a little googling, apparently when he was 13 he sodomized a 9 year old and a 10 year old. http://www.adn.com/2009/02/27/705309/man-facing-rape-charges-has-oregon.html edit:turns out he was 15, not 13, when he assaulted two girls, one 9, one 10. his parents claimed that he couldn't be held responsible because of his klinefelters, but there is no indication that anyone suggested…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:35 AM
1

and I can counter with the case of kitty genovese. there are plenty of instances where a man is robbing or beating up on a woman, and nobody gets involved. me personally, I had my coked out brother follow me through the lobby of a four-star hotel, shoving me, threatening me, and cursing me because I didn't want to go to the hotel pool with him to watch his shit. nobody intervened, even after he back-handed me across the face. this is ONE instance, however, and cannot be extrapolated to reflect t…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:18 PM
1

depends on what kind of help. again, generalization, and generalizations both sidetrack your argument and open you up for attack (plus it's difficult to get hard facts to back them up). you could say, it's easier for female domestic abuse victims to get help. this is undisputedly true, it's pretty easy to get figures on this you could say, it's more common for women to stay home with children, there's less societal pressure to be the main provider for a family (assuming the father is in the pict…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:20 PM
1

np. I just wouldn't make blanket statements like "it is alright for women to fail professionally" though... because that's kind of sexist, incredibly condescending, and not very true. but other than that, I think there's an overly large amount of hysteria surrounding the wage gap myth in first world countries. shit, my mom's earned more than my dad and my stepdad my entire life, and at one point earned more than both of them combined. I'm probably going to earn more than my brother (he majored i…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:23 AM
1

....I've used the men's bathroom if the women's is full. If there's 2 bathrooms (each individual rooms with 1 toilet, 1 sink) and there is a line a million miles long for the women's room and none for the men's, I don't really see the issue. I wouldn't mind a guy ducking into the women's in a situation like this if the lines were reversed.... not that they ever are. I have never, not once, seen a men's bathroom with a shorter line than the women's. but if it's loads of stalls and urinals, that's…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:03 PM
3

in countries where maternity leave is split between the parents, the wage gap is super low between the sexes. sounds fair, right? dads legally have the right to take time off work to help with their kids, this then reduces the impact of childbirth on the career of women, pay gap vanishes, everyone is happy edit: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/world/europe/10iht-sweden.html?pagewanted=all BAM
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:33 PM
0

I would argue that his ex had some SERIOUS ISSUES (mental health issues) if she "cried for hours" over something as petty as this. crying for hours isn't normal unless you're seriously injured or your parents died. society doesn't "look down on men" for not walking roadside. this is one of the lesser-known men-etiquette rules. also, isn't men's health sort of like cosmo for guys? not surprising that they spew ridiculous bullshit. cosmo has told me I should have sex even if I don't want to, also …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:30 PM
3

there was a fascinating piece in the times that says single women with no kids in professional careers don't really have much of a wage gap when compared to their peers.... lemme see if I can find it
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:54 PM
0

dunno, my boyfriend does this because it makes him feel manly. I could care less. I have never once insisted that I walk farther away from the road, because it seems stupid. however, my boyfriend has an unsettling habit of just ambling into crosswalks, so I watch him like a mother hen to make sure he doesn't walk into turning vehicles or cars running a red light, which is a major problem in our city.... I think it evens out. he has too big a faith in white-man-says-walk. I've saved him from a fe…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:51 PM
1

ok, yes I agree that it is very troubling that men are incarcerated at a rate much higher than women, given that both sexes are about equally as likely to commit drug-related offenses (although a case could be made that men are more likely to commit violent crimes... to be honest, I'm not really on the up-and-up as far as the gender breakdown of various sorts of crime go. some quick googling of "gender + violent crime statistics" turned up that 88.8% of homicides are committed by men, so there's…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:36 AM
1

you know women get raped in prison too, right? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/22/alabama-womens-prison-sexual-abuse_n_1537623.html not saying that this diminishes the importance of putting an end to the rape of male prisoners, just saying that you can't scream, "PRISON RAPE! CHECKMATE FEMINISTS! MALE RAPE IS THE WORSTEST AND THE ONLY RAPE THAT COUNTS!"
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:32 PM
8

wtf? it doesn't prove your point. in my example everyone has the same amount of sexual partners and the majority of women are not sleeping with the minority of men. your "argument" consists of repeating the same thing over and over and over again, ignoring differences in the rate of transmission, refusing to address the transmission of herpes from mouth to genitals, assuming every woman is heterosexual/contracts herpes from peen, and failing to cite any legitimate sources to back up your beliefs…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:19 PM
9

there's a ~4% infection rate from women to men. if an infected women sleeps with 20 men, 4% of that is slightly less than one. if TWO infected women sleep with TWENTY MEN EACH, the infection rate says that slightly less than 2 men will contract herpes (I rounded up for simplicity's sake). MATH. LOGIC.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:05 PM
8

oohhhh my god, NO IT WOULDN'T. roughly 2x as many women have herpes as men (~40%, which is still not the majority of women, but whatever clearly math isn't your strong point). women contract herpes at a rate roughly 2x as frequently as men (and that's a conservative estimate, some studies put the ROT as high as ~30%). the difference between infection rates would not be smaller!! not to mention, women don't just contract herpes from men with infected junk. they can have congenital herpes (from th…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:28 PM
12

ORAL SEX. Also, women can get herpes from OTHER WOMEN, so you DO NOT know "for a fact" that those women had sex with infected men. Those 40% of women are also having sex with OTHER men, only those men are not getting infected, which is skewing the data.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:43 PM
16

PS the 10% estimated ROT between infected men and uninfected women is conservative, some studies place it even higher. The NY times article I linked (bc, y'know, I provide sources) states that some estimates place the ROT as high as ~30%. further support for the argument that percentage of infected individuals can't be used to bolster the 80/20 belief.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:27 PM
12

[citation needed] you're not addressing the transmission of herpes from mouth to genitals. you're not addressing the disparate rate of infection. you're not providing sources. you just want to be angry about women "discriminating" against men and only having sex with a small percentage of them. I don't know why you keep bringing up "immaculate infection" since I have not argued that women are not sleeping with infected men. It's a straw man argument because you can't refute anything I'm saying.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:07 PM
18

you're not looking at the system. the SYSTEM includes rate of transmission. you're looking at ONE outdated survey and drawing wild conclusions. I'm not arguing that women are getting herpes from toilet seats. I'm arguing that men are less likely to get herpes from women if they are uninfected, and more likely to give herpes to uninfected women. also, your "study" (which you do not cite, and openly admit is outdated) only looks at genital herpes. women are ALSO more likely to contract herpes from…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:41 PM
21

are you fucking *kidding me? uninfected men are having sex with infected woman, but the rate of transmission between men and women is half that as between women and men so they are NOT CONTRACTING HERPES AS MUCH, THEREFORE LESS MEN HAVE HERPES THAN WOMEN. like, if the rate of infection differs, of course the gender with the higher rate of contraction will have a higher percentage of infected individuals. it's not horrible non-logic dumbass. look at the numbers, white women have double the infect…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:08 PM
28

nopenopenope. women are more likely to contract herpes than men. they're more than 2x more likely, in fact. a woman having sex with an infected man has an estimated 10% chance of contracting herpes. Conversely, a man has a 4% chance of contracting herpes from an infected women. therefore, more women have herpes. you can't use rate of herpes infection to back up your belief that 80% of women are having sex with 20% of men. http://consults.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/giving-your-partner-herpes/
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter