TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

killaB310 Archive

View 0 posts and 163 comments by killaB310 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

“She’s different”. If I had a dime for every time I heard that I’d be… almost wealthy.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:31 PM
2

That would make you a male feminist, by default.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:10 PM
-1

I think you just proved the poster’s point. Thanks for your input! Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:39 PM
2

“Chaaaarlie Murrrrphy”
/r/Divorce_Men26/03/24 06:29 PM
3

This comment deserves to be stickied
/r/Divorce_Men06/03/24 01:32 AM
–

“Unattractive because they don’t put the effort to look handsome” Attractive features/looks are primarily genetic. We all know women are experts at manipulating their looks through makeup, botox, fillers, lifts, tucks, spanx, heels, hair dye, filters, the list goes on. If this is what you call “effort”, I’ll stick to those with natural beauty. Are there any left? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:14 PM
1

Good luck finding a man who has the laundry list of attributes 95% of modern women say they want. Including 6+ figure salary, healthy social circle & relatives, other women want him but he doesn’t want them, has time for you and the kids, takes on 50% (minimum) of the domestic chores. Also, must be strong and stoic yet sensitive to your emotional needs. Question: What do you bring to the table to match all of these traits you’re looking for in a man? I’ll wait ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 05:51 PM
1

Isn’t that what literally all single parents do on a daily basis? If they have no relatives close by or can’t afford a nanny/maid (the majority of people). So what’s the big deal? It’s normal for a growing number of lower/middle class families.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:19 AM
1

You’re comparing 10 and 20 years olds?
/r/Divorce_Men25/06/23 03:19 PM
1

You’ll know that you have succeeded when: The divorce is final You begin redirecting your precious time, energy, and attention back to yourself and those who truly care about you AND last but the most important point… You never allow anyone to treat you like this again
/r/Divorce_Men23/06/23 04:39 PM
14

Pure gold in this post. Also, don’t forget those situations where Mom or other close friends or relatives observe the children gravitating towards Dad over Mom. That’s plenty of reason enough to drive a perma-wedge between Dad and kids.
/r/Divorce_Men30/05/23 06:23 PM
2

Many of these women are wedding planning and divorce planning at the same time.
/r/Divorce_Men30/05/23 03:41 AM
2

No truer words have been written…
/r/Divorce_Men28/05/23 04:31 PM
4

Who hurt you? lol
/r/Divorce_Men20/05/23 06:46 AM
3

Frozen yogurt lol. Congrats you earned your peace and that’s worth more than anything these days.
/r/Divorce_Men20/05/23 06:22 AM
7

They crave drama. Agents of chaos.
/r/Divorce_Men11/04/23 05:53 AM
0

Your logic is…illogical.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 12:06 AM
4

cAnkles
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 02:38 AM
4

Great comment. The only part i disagree with is her “sticking with him during his struggle phase”. He became the first biracial US President. Im sure the signs were there early and she knew he would go far. Whether he became President or not. I doubt she had a better option at the time or after.
/r/Divorce_Men31/12/22 08:41 PM
5

This is profound. A “wife” essentially becomes government owned, once she has your child and/or gets married.
/r/Divorce_Men31/12/22 08:34 PM
1

You’re sending heart emoji’s now?? wtf? Ok “bro” you win. Later.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 11:26 PM
1

You got it from a paper lol. A paper that has about as much validity as a marriage certificate does today. Its probably based on old stats gathered by another random dude on the internet. Lol. Be sure to present it to your Family Court judge during the divorce proceedings.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 10:35 PM
1

If you’re pro marriage just say so. That doesn’t mean marriage (as an institution) is a successful or worthwhile venture in 2022-2023, just because you said so, or because the majority of citizens get married at some point in their lifetime. That doesn’t mean its still working. If half of them fail, that’s not success.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 10:18 PM
1

Funny that you here “debunking” stats when yours isn’t worth debunking because it’s useless to begin with. Everyone knows someone that’s divorced. I can’t “prove” that but i’m willing to bet its true. Can you disprove it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 09:50 PM
0

Your 81% isn’t an accurate representation of modern US marriages as a whole. Not to mention, marriage today is just a piece of paper that can easily be voided and often is. If it wasn’t, ~50% of all marriages wouldn’t end in divorce and the current marriage rate wouldn’t be at a 50 year low. 81% stat is irrelevant in this context other than wishful thinking on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 09:27 PM
1

Your numbers exclude divorce, separation, adultery. How many of those men are happily married (i.e., faithful) or stay married? These men are STILL in the dating pool (or jump back in the water). You still haven’t presented a viable counter to OP’s argument. Lol I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 09:09 PM
1

They may not be facts but his observations and experiences are true for many in western society today, whether factual or not. Present a solid argument to the contrary and ill congratulate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 08:46 PM
1

You are somewhat correct BUT it doesn’t change the facts that OP presented here. BOTH arguments can be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 08:34 PM
0

But the costs aren’t the same.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 08:12 PM
2

True. It can be a slippery slope. Our goal is to find the best “investment” option, meanwhile, minimizing risk exposure.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 05:13 PM
4

Good points. Technically, nothing is free. Both sides have their flaws. Paying a sex worker is like renting an apartment, while investing in a relationship is like mortgaging a house. You can still default on the mortgage and lose your home but there’s no chance you’ll ever own the apartment, forever a tenant.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 04:53 PM
4

Would you pay subway if you knew someone willing to make you a sandwich for free?
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 03:53 PM
22

Misogynist and incel are the modern male equivalent to btch and whre.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 03:26 PM
6

The problem with paying for it is, you have to PAY for it. You’re ‘hiring’ someone to do a job they wouldn’t normally do because the attraction isn’t there.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 03:18 PM
7

True. No fault divorce and child custody laws basically incentivize women to sabotage or “graduate” from their marriages in favor of girl’s nights, girl’s trips, hot girl summer, fall, winter, spring.
/r/Divorce_Men24/12/22 02:36 AM
3

Marriage is great for society, not always the case for men though.
/r/Divorce_Men24/12/22 02:22 AM
7

I see. You’d rather bring the “holier than thou” attitude over here. Got it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 03:50 AM
1

Why are you here telling us anything?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 03:46 AM
1

“Men are trash is, well, trash”. I like how you glossed over that little mantra. Well I’d like to see you take that same energy over to the plethora of feminists pages on Reddit and see how you long before you’re cast off like a gypsy.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 02:02 AM
5

How is that any different than, “men are trash” or “believe all women”?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 01:27 AM
6

Thats true. Women can persevere and withstand any trial or tribulation. When they eventually wake up and ask the men for help (while using their small voice).
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 01:16 AM
5

Laugh in public, cry in the car.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 03:17 PM
5

Far. Sometimes fat too.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 02:57 PM
2

Oh now we resort to name calling. Very mature. Stay classy.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 08:23 AM
1

Im not saying that. They’re extremely important…in producing the next generation of OF creators.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 12:17 AM
2

Criminals, strippers, sex workers typically come from single mother homes.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 11:46 PM
9

Another soon to be example of, “get woke, go broke”.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 04:51 PM
1

Boyfriend? I thought Feminists “don’t need no man”.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 06:34 AM
1

No, married to a 70 year old.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:31 AM
1

Don’t knock it. Could be you one day…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 02:37 AM
4

Basically, Feminism is a legit hate group.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 05:09 PM
4

LGBTFNGXYZ typically are left-leaning and align with feminist beliefs, therefore, protected by the sisterhood.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 05:06 PM
22

Women are doing more than leaving their homes. They’re leaving their homes half naked much of the time. If we truly live in a gRape culture, how are they able to get away with this?
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 04:13 PM
6

Yes. This debate isn’t going anywhere because Feminists tend to focus on negatives and will never be satisfied no matter how far society shifts in their favor.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 03:44 PM
0

Women like the idea of “support/believe all women” but underneath the surface, many of them are catty, jealous, and highly judgmental of one another. A world ruled by women (which is what feminists actually want) would be 10x more oppressive than any nation ruled by men, past or present.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 08:00 AM
2

To build, defend, and protect you and society. Oh yeah and spiders too.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 03:15 AM
4

You can always spot a feminist through unnecessary usage of the word “literally” haha.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 04:31 AM
9

Misery loves company.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 03:17 PM
4

Well this sub exists for a reason. Feminism is essentially pro-woman, anti-man. This is what you get in return. Yin vs Yang.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 10:31 PM
1

The other items on your list are intangible. I just think its interesting that you omitted the one major issue in many relationships that can more easily be quantified. Just seems convenient that’s all.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 10:20 PM
1

50/50 or some other ratio?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 09:56 PM
1

You left out one “minor” attribute: finances.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 09:54 PM
4

That’s ok with me. I don’t have to do anything…but sit back and watch as Feminism continues to get exposed for the fraud that it is. It’s no longer relevant, its followers are functionally useless AND entitled, and it’s about to implode. My popcorn’s ready…
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 09:07 PM
3

Of course it doesn’t matter. Typical fem talking points regurgitated over and over and over again. Proving the point that feminism isn’t about equality, it’s about giving women zero accountability, meanwhile still holding men accountable for the same actions.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:55 PM
8

Im referring to the person that posted the meme being a modern woman, which is term often used by feminists and their advocates to describe themselves. This is not the same oppressed group that you were trying to tie into the conversation. That’s irrelevant to THIS discussion.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:49 PM
3

Ill ask you the same question since you decided to chime in…How do you think women would react if a man posted the same meme in reverse?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:38 PM
4

I would say the same about anyone who posted something like that for the world to see. THIS one just happened to be posted by a woman and I think it’s childish. That’s why im commenting on it. You (conveniently) didn’t answer my question either...
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:31 PM
8

You replied to ME pontificating about the past and women’s basic rights. What’s that got to do with 2022? This is about a meme posted in modern times by a modern woman. What point are you trying to make?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:27 PM
11

Im talking about modern women. Reading is fundamental lol. Which era are you living in, Victorian?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:12 PM
7

Never stated that men aren’t guilty of it. The difference is…modern women do it openly (see meme above) and society doesn’t question it. If a man were to post the same meme in reverse, he would be banned, blocked, cancelled, and ridiculed. THAT’S the double standard.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:07 PM
9

Since you claim to be a monk….would you post a meme that states: “Craving pu$$y but unwilling to deal with women to get some”? If so, how well do you think something like that would be received by the masses? Not well I would presume. That’s what I call a double standard.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 07:47 PM
18

Two different stories. Let’s face it, modern women aren’t on some spiritual journey to discover themselves and gain a better overall life perspective. They’ve been hurt because the majority of them CHOSE the wrong men. Now they are projecting their hatred and insecurities on to ALL men with a lack of accountability to top it off. There’s a difference.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 07:05 PM
62

The mother’s behavior may not have been a direct result of feminism BUT this type of behavior is supported, and in some cases encouraged, by Feminists. Feminists who also refuse to acknowledge questionable behavior by mothers that often leads to dysfunctional children. The son’s womanizing behavior will only serve as ammo for feminists on the “men are trash” bandwagon, meanwhile, they conveniently ignore the impact her parenting (or lack of) had on his outlook towards women.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 04:15 AM
5

This entire generation of women have more mental health issues than ever before due to an obsession with social media and extreme leftist ideologies. The bubble is about to burst just wait for it.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 08:11 PM
2

That would be the only argument she could be trying to make. She’s acting as if extended families and two parent households are mutually exclusive.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 12:08 AM
3

Its not a question about one vs the other. You can have all of the things you mentioned in addition to a solid two parent family.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 12:04 AM
4

She’s trying to elicit a response/reaction from you. Don’t give her any unnecessary attention or you’re encouraging her behavior. She’s acting like a child so respond accordingly.
/r/Divorce_Men21/11/22 11:44 PM
6

Exactly. Its not like there’s a bathroom bouncer checking ID’s at the door. Pretty soon all bathrooms will be co-ed. That’s where we seem to be headed.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 12:06 AM
6

Why would a lesbian (not trans) use the mens room?
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 12:03 AM
3

Well who doesn’t want free money? Its just those basic but annoying little economic principles called supply, demand, and inflation. They always get in the way.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 06:50 PM
3

Unfortunately, the only way you “get some of that back” is if someone else pays for it…and the vicious cycle continues to spin.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 05:24 PM
7

If your educational goals were realized, and due to that you acquired gainful employment, why would you need debt forgiveness? Sounds like the risk/reward would balance itself out in the end.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 04:21 PM
7

So you’re mad because im mad? Lol you proved my point.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 12:04 AM
6

Well you’re the one who kicked this off by implying women don’t want to be housewives. You started with a broad generalization now you’re upset because other people are generalizing? Disingenuous you say? Pot meet kettle.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 10:07 PM
7

To me, Feminists just seem angry all the time. Nothing in society is ever good enough and they’re looking for reasons to stay angry. I hear the laundry list of arguments and it’s like, what are you even fighting for at this point? Most of it just seems petty.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 09:55 PM
5

Who you mad at bro? Did I forget to use the proper pronouns?
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 09:46 PM
5

TL;DR
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 09:19 PM
9

Comparing a housewife to a 12 year old, really? You just managed to insult an entire class of women just to prove a feminist talking point? Some of those women might say raising strong independent children is the hardest, most rewarding job there is.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 08:54 PM
1

Take time to figure out how you ended up in that relationship in the first place. This will give you insight into your relationship habits so you don’t fall into the same trap/cycle again.
/r/Divorce_Men06/11/22 10:55 PM
6

Most men aren’t necessarily looking for a woman to support them financially. Men tend to rank other qualities above career or earning potential. Women tend to be attracted to these things, not men usually. Edit: I would say men complain about female hypergamy just as much as women complain about men overly focusing on looks/body image. Two sides of the same coin in actuality.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 08:37 PM
2

I noticed this while growing up with sisters. They tend to get away with more as children and you think it will end when they become adults but it doesn’t. The entitlement grows because they rarely if ever hear the word “no”. They continue to be safeguarded by society, recognize this early on, and wonder…”what else can i get away with?” Repeat cycle.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/22 10:35 PM
5

The difference is, men are more likely to face the consequences of their actions much sooner. Society has a low tolerance for male dysfunction while women often times get a pass for their negative behavior and more likely to repeat the pattern with no objection.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/22 09:38 PM
4

Yes because fathers with good intentions often try to protect their daughters from the “wrong” men which can breed fear and resentment in their daughters.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/22 08:10 PM
8

I tend to question the narrative that women are more peaceful than men. They seem to be just as eager to go to war as men are. They just go about it differently.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/22 08:05 PM
6

Another main point is: women get to choose whether they have children or not. Men do not get to choose and have to follow the woman’s decision IF that man wants children, now or in the future. Her body, her choice, her child(ren). The US Family Court system proves this every day.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/22 06:46 PM
1

There are many (male, female, and other) who support/promote gynocentric social law and order but do not claim the title “feminist”. Ok then, I ask…what are they?
/r/Divorce_Men20/10/22 04:39 PM
6

Sounds like the current divorce laws were written by feminists…
/r/Divorce_Men19/10/22 08:43 PM
2

These days you can be both…
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 06:07 PM
1

A duplex
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 06:07 PM
2

Im not even mad, you’re the one who’s mad
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/22 03:04 AM
2

Its “resort”. You called yourself a feminist! On an anti-feminist thread no less…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 11:18 PM
2

Doesn’t even matter anymore. You’re exposed. That’s all that matters.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 11:08 PM
2

Typical feminist. Can’t prove your point, resort to insults and personal attacks. Go be triggered on a feminist sub. Nice try.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 11:01 PM
2

See that’s the prob w feminism. You think we’re naive enough to believe its about equality. Its not. Its about female superiority. Its disingenuous at its core and ill be LOL when world finally wakes up and realizes its all a farce.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 10:45 PM
2

Calling me names? Zero harm coming from you. Don’t care what you think lol. Just admit you’re a feminist and stand behind the phrase “believe all women” lol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 10:35 PM
2

Ohhh you’re a woman trolling the anti-feminist sub. A feminist troll. I digress. Makes total sense now. You’re mad because i wrote, “women”. If the message doesn’t fit you, just keep moving. Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 10:16 PM
2

Its called a generality dude. Don’t get butt hurt at me because you’re the kind of person that takes every statement literally like Drax from Guardians of the Galaxy. Incapable reading between the lines lol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 10:08 PM
2

So when you hear a woman say, “men are trash” do you assume they mean 100% of men or are you smart enough to deduce they mean…men in general?
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 09:53 PM
2

So if i wrote, “women in general” you’d have no complaints? Would that help you sleep better tonight? Ok, women (in general) can’t make up their minds when it comes to prostitution being empowerment or exploitation. lol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 09:44 PM
3

You’re focusing on semantics to distract from the point. Most adults with common sense understand the difference between absolutes and generalities. I shouldn’t have to explain it unless you’re a child (or feminist). Typical of the feminist movement (generally women). They can’t decide whether prostitution is empowering or exploitative. Their argument: anything a women chooses is empowering simply because she made a choice and receives financial compensation, yet at the same time, men are pigs t…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 09:30 PM
3

“Women” doesn’t equal ALL women. Ever heard of a generality? Clearly reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 09:15 PM
3

Obviously. Generalities exist…for a reason. Just like, “men are trash”. Ever heard that line before? Do you bring the same energy to those women when you read/hear that?
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 09:09 PM
3

They aren’t a hive mind. I said “women” (in general). That doesn’t mean ALL women. There’s a difference. Topics such as these are couched in generality because absolutes are not possible.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 08:33 PM
1

Maybe, however, they’re more likely to engage in groupthink and follow trends, than go against popular opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 05:23 PM
42

Women can’t decide if it’s exploitation or empowerment. Just like everything else…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 01:29 AM
61

Some said it would take too long. Sex is easier money for them.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 01:27 AM
2

Do you know her? If so, i hear she’ll be single soon. You got a shot bro!
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:58 PM
1

Im pretty sure those kids love their dad. Its pretty clear he’s a family man.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:57 PM
2

Idk you, im talking about her lol
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:52 PM
2

Well if it’s equally their fault, then what’s the problem?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:47 PM
1

Its her choice to get a divorce. Plans change. If you’re really committed to the marriage you work through it. If not, get divorced. Her choice but i still think it’s unreasonable and drastic just because he wants to play another season. His happiness matters just as much as hers.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:46 PM
2

Idk what you’re saying but he may have kept playing just to get away from her. Based on the way she’s acting I would too.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:36 PM
1

He didn’t initiate the divorce. She gave him an ultimatum. Who else in his position is being forced to retire? Doesn’t sound like something a reasonable person would do.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:36 PM
2

Sorry but ill take his recent performance on the field and the opinions of the Tampa Bay exec’s, coaching staff, and players over yours buddy. Tied for 1st in their division btw. Sounds like he should retire to me. Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:32 PM
2

Exactly. He’s not. Still the best option in Tampa. If he’s so washed up like you say he is, why hasn’t the org. moved on?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:28 PM
1

He seems very happy to me. Top 5-10 (current) + GOAT.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:25 PM
2

“Who’s skills have faded and is a shell of what they once were” Same goes for her. Haha!
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:24 PM
5

If that’s what you call pathetic, what’s successful? Lol. Can’t hate on the dude he’s done what most only dream of and he’ll be better off than you, me, and everyone on this thread whether he stays married or gets divorced.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 10:18 PM
7

Did you consider that maybe its not about the money for him? He’s the GOAT in one of the most competitive sports and positions on the globe. Most people have never been the GOAT at anything let alone top 1% lol.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:59 PM
8

“Why won’t he retire” If you were still arguably top 5-10 in your position and bringing in $15M/yr would you give that up?? How do you know why she’s divorcing him?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:53 PM
16

Sure she can still get a guy with more money but he’ll be 30+ years older.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:02 PM
10

*His best years on the football field. His actual best years will be as a divorced, retired (GOAT), multi-millionaire, playboy, philanthropist. This divorce was Giselle’s preemptive strike. She’s aging FAST and her every wish is no longer his command. She lost him so might as well screw him over first by taking the kids before he screws her younger version.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 08:52 PM
1

You’re welcome lol
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 08:57 PM
3

Im that guy
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 08:30 PM
5

Hire a surrogate
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 06:43 PM
1

Would be curious to hear the outcome of this. I too am in a similar situation wondering if it’s worth dropping $$$ to get the courts involved. Is your ex entitled to an increase in child support since the middle child chose not to visit?
/r/Divorce_Men19/09/22 09:03 PM
1

I admire the selflessness and maturity of this post. How did the kids respond to your ex’s lack of willingness to co-parent? I hear this behavior can lead to parental alienation but some say the kids come around later down the road when they’re older and wiser.
/r/Divorce_Men08/09/22 12:17 AM
-4

Don’t be fooled…Amber may have lost in court but she’s looked at at a martyr by the feminazi movement. The only reason she lost was because of Camille. Zero chance a male attorney would have won that case for Johnny due to optics.
/r/Divorce_Men04/09/22 10:46 PM
6

Well said. Women don’t necessarily feel the same obligation or pressure to maintain order that men do. Women definitely benefit from it, but men carry the burden of building, planning, and securing things so that women don’t have to. Women are very aware of this. When men try to hold women accountable, its actually laughable. Why would they hold themselves accountable when society (including men) doesn’t hold them to the same standard? Women know this. The fight for equality is a sham.
/r/Divorce_Men03/09/22 06:21 PM
4

That typically leads to requests for more compensation. Her lawyer certainly wants that for her. The longer this drags on, the more she (and each attorney) stand to gain.
/r/Divorce_Men26/08/22 01:01 AM
8

Sounds like she and her lawyer are trying to milk you. Unfortunately, there is little incentive for a judge to shut down this behavior early on. She believes she can get a better deal by going to trial, but can only pull this so many times before it tarnishes her reputation in the eyes of the court.
/r/Divorce_Men25/08/22 05:10 PM
4

Women like the “idea” of being married, instant status boost, knowing some guy will be there to serve them and their needs. They generally don’t like making sacrifices. Especially for a man. Goes against today’s culture, making it easy to walk away when she realizes how much effort it takes.
/r/Divorce_Men25/08/22 04:29 PM
3

Contrary to popular belief, I think this is typical for a lot of men. Once married, there is very low incentive for a wife to continue working on the marriage to make it better.
/r/Divorce_Men25/08/22 04:05 PM
3

Absolutely. Another Redditor practicing drugstore psychology to feel better about himself. You can seek information about things that affect you while managing your peace of mind. These two things are not mutually exclusive.
/r/Divorce_Men24/08/22 06:07 PM
1

If your ex isn’t in the military?
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/22 02:52 AM
2

Yes, and just as many (if not more) pro-choice men. See SanctuaryMoon’s posts as an example. Im pro-choice too. Feminists are not pro-choice, they are “pro-choice for women only” AND they have a right to feel that way, however, I believe everyone (men and women) should be treated fairly but that’s not the case. Women receive preferential treatment in just about every area in modern society. Many of us just choose to live in denial about that.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:24 PM
2

I think you meant “invisible”. Which is yet another disadvantage for men in the reproductive arena, making my original point. Women maintain a monopoly on the child bearing process leaving men powerless in these circumstances. They can’t reproduce without men but hold ownership over the entire process. Abortion is just another tool women have that men don’t.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 01:33 PM
3

He’s one of those kids still being breast fed in high school.
/r/Divorce_Men20/08/22 08:24 AM
3

IF men could get pregnant they wouldn’t be men. Now you’re moving the goal post meaning your original argument’s falling apart time to activate plan B. I appreciate the effort and the friendly debate but lets be honest, you haven’t been able to refute any of my points yet, you just keep reaching for new arguments. The truth is…there’s no logic to modern day feminism. Women have more rights than men. Now they also have zero accountability and an unrealistic sense of entitlement to go with it.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 07:52 AM
5

That’s obvious. We all control our own bodies (including…women!). You brought up abortion…post fertilization. Women have the same options as men prior to any sexual encounter, no advantage there. If we assume there were 2 consenting adults in this equation, men have no rights. Pre conception: equal rights. Post conception: women have ALL the rights.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 04:04 AM
5

Men have ZERO reproductive rights and women can’t procreate on their own yet so I would say women are still ahead in that regard. Ok, what else ya got?
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:50 AM
2

According to feminists…a wage gap still exists so they would beg to differ with you there. Even so, if a woman earns a healthy salary she’s more likely to “marry up” than a man is, due to societal influences.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:35 AM
5

How many of those men are married or feel pressured by society to make decisions that favor women over men in today’s pro-fem climate? Not talking about pre 1970s era. The power you’re referring to is in name only and I see plenty of women in positions of power too whether its political, in education, or the corporate world. Also, the majority of educators are women and they are responsible for shaping the minds of every child that sits in a classroom. Thats a lot of influence over future leader…
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:24 AM
3

That’s anecdotal. If we analyze the bigger picture, how often do women pay spousal support and child support to men?
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:22 AM
3

Yes. Its called spousal support and child support. Which gender files for divorce most often? Now ask yourself…would it happen to be the same gender that’s most likely to demand and support marriage in the first place? Modern day relationships are controlled by women. That means household income, finances, and children are controlled by women. We live in a matriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 12:42 AM
11

Women benefit the most…no matter who sits in those positions of power. That’s the point, which you intentionally (maybe unintentionally) keep missing.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 11:56 PM
4

Wow. You nailed it. Only part id say you left out pertains to starting over with a new family. He’ll still have to support his original family, financially (and emotionally if he chooses), meaning now he gets to pay for two wives not just one.
/r/Divorce_Men14/08/22 11:31 PM
7

Sounds like wifey cares more about the women at his job (that she doesn’t know) than her husband who supports and pays all of the bills for her AND her family. Another tale of entitlement. How much proof do we need?!
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/22 10:21 PM
6

It sounds like she’s already made her decision and is presenting it to OP for informational purposes. 9/10 by the time a woman threatens to leave, she’s had one foot out the door for months maybe even years.
/r/Divorce_Men03/08/22 08:10 PM
1

He stated, “she outright refused to coparent”. She sounds unreasonable (maybe OP is too, idk). Nevertheless, this sounds like an ugly divorce. Complying with the wishes of an unreasonable person, in the midst of an ugly, contentious divorce/child custody battle is an exercise in futility. He needs to fight for clear visitation orders enforced by the court or…his ex will continue to feel entitled and run him around. Trust me, this type of behavior will only escalate from here if left unchecked.
/r/Divorce_Men03/08/22 06:47 PM
1

The only details we have are the details OP provided here. There is nothing wrong with a parenting app but its no substitute for in-person visitation. It sounds like his ex his trying to replace in-person visits with an app. This is a common tactic used by disgruntled ex’s to create distance and separation, while building a case against the other parent. If that’s the case here, he needs to petition the court for 50/50 joint legal and physical custody, with visitation. Children should have the o…
/r/Divorce_Men02/08/22 06:39 PM
1

They BOTH should be acting like mature adults in this scenario because both are adult parents- equally. Based on OP’s side of the story, she’s acting childish and entitled. Whether the courts back him up, or not, is an entirely different story.
/r/Divorce_Men02/08/22 12:00 AM
5

Serious question…what do you call girls who sleep with fuckboi’s?
/r/seduction30/07/22 07:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter