TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

killcat Archive

View 1 posts and 2,440 comments by killcat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social Issueskillcat/r/MensRights01/02/19 08:42 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,440 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

It's a legal definition, depending on where it happens it may not be, legally, rape.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 08:56 PM
4

https://news.sky.com/story/justice-secretary-shabana-mahmood-has-ultimate-ambition-to-close-womens-prisons-13221374
/r/MensRights14/10/24 02:23 AM
7

You might want to look at how laws are being applied in the UK now.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:09 PM
6

For some people it's a moral imperative that woman are to be protected (and yes I know that flys in the face of "equality") and facts be damned.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:52 PM
20

The only logical explanation is "because the consequences for you will be severe", the police won't care if you were hit first, even like in this case if you have video evidence, a woman was harmed, that's all that matters, it will considered a "disproportionate response".
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:43 PM
11

And will this law be applied to female perpetrators? Bet not.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:24 PM
3

It's mostly about modern politics, when women as a group have been sold the idea that THEY ar the victims, then being the people that "offer the solution" is a great way to get elected.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 05:45 PM
1

Yeah that's a delusion.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 09:34 AM
1

I personally would trade my lifestyle for a native pre-contact indian's That's part of the fallacy, you don't actually KNOW what it was like, brutish and short, are often used, food insecurity, constant intertribal warfare, no real medicine etc
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:15 AM
8

It's the Nobel Savage fallacy, every culture, that isn't Western, is somehow better and more "pure".
/r/MensRights05/10/24 07:51 AM
4

AI?
/r/MensRights04/10/24 11:29 PM
25

The state defines "hate" which means that it's defined by what the most easily offended progressives think is hateful, call a transwoman a man, hate, call a straight white guy a "Nazi that should be shot" that's fine he's not part of a "protected group".
/r/MensRights04/10/24 11:22 PM
8

What is it with the pigs and frogs, it's unnatural I tell you.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:59 AM
1

Not as far as progressives are concerned, they use the feminist playbook.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 07:55 PM
0

Nope. Because men are not, in and of themselves a "marginalized group", gay men, yes, non-white men (Asians maybe) yes, but straight white men, no.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 06:36 AM
4

Not sure, many countries do, and it's "not a straight, white male".
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:31 PM
79

Standard power grab, "OH lets put a woman in charge for DEI money".
/r/MensRights26/09/24 11:58 PM
6

A lot of Dr's go into medicine for money, they don't tend to be good Dr's.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:05 AM
7

In addition point out that certain countries (the UK for one) explicitly exclude men as victims of rape, rape is an emotionally charged word and it's restricted to female victims.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 08:41 PM
34

Depends on the definition of "violence" they are using, for example "sexual violence" lumps in all incidents of "sexual harassment" with sexual assault, and that includes staring.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 08:26 PM
7

Yup reads like "And then everybody clapped".
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:32 PM
72

Oh it's worse, "I consented at the time, but based on knowledge I now have I would not have so it was rape".
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:06 AM
29

Billionaires have high paid lawyers.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 07:19 PM
7

The answer is simple , there is more demand for female models, and that's fine, however if you try to use the same argument in pretty much any high paying, male dominate profession it's sexism.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 05:44 AM
7

Did you drop this "/s".
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:05 AM
9

Extreme huh? In whose opinion? They already have the cops turn up for mean tweets.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:04 AM
14

Mine? No. But there are a LOT of guys that will say ANYTHING, pretend to be ANYTHING to get laid, vegan hippy chick, they're vegan etc.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:15 AM
18

Again, pussy. If you're involved with a feminist (I know, why would you?) you need to go along, if you want to bang a modern "progressive woman" you need to go along, simple really.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:41 PM
7

There's no point, it will ALWAYS be around.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:38 PM
7

The reddit admins have explicitly stated that men are "not a minority group" and therefore it's fine to use this sort of language.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:45 PM
2

Female "artists" make two kinds of videos "men suck" and "fuck boi", male ones make typically "I miss you".
/r/MensRights24/08/24 08:16 PM
7

It's the fact that they only care about it because "women effected".
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:06 PM
12

The difference is men are told to change and women are told they're perfect.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:49 PM
14

Feminism IS a hive mind to a greater or lesser degree, same with any ideology.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:47 PM
9

It's not that it's true, it's that it's convenient.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 01:20 AM
8

Oh it's worse than that, they are comparing male executives working 60hrs a week to a female assistant working 35.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:43 PM
38

TBF not EVERY case, just most.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:08 PM
12

On reddit? Sometimes.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:46 PM
2

Their visible physiognomy, jaw, shoulder to hip ratio, hip to waist ratio, even if you ignore the test results due to the organization that asked for them, not the lab that did them that's accredited, the fact that the IOC has done NO testing is suggestive that this is ideologically based. It would be easily disproven with a blood test.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 06:21 PM
2

We have no evidence they have a womb. They are likely suffering from a DSD and have internal testes, their "sex" is based on their passport.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:08 AM
8

Yes, and watching "counter protesters" walking around openly carrying weapons (machetes) while the police ignore them was enlightening.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:39 PM
1

SOME men, it's a shift in the victim hierarchy pyramid, immigrants from certain countries.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:37 PM
1

Partly it's testosterone, high levels of it suppress fear and increase aggression, it's one of the reasons that women "feel" more at risk walking down the street when the statistics on violent crime don't support it. It's in the species best interest that men are more risk taking than women.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:00 AM
6

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/jul/26/context-ilhan-omars-our-country-should-be-more-fea/ Even allowing for the editing lets replace "white men" with "Blacks" in the statement, is it OK now?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:37 AM
7

DEMOCRATS. Not Harris specifically.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:21 AM
14

They are using the "language of hate" just try replacing "men" in any statement with Blacks and see how it reads.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:42 PM
51

Or the government should pay for their life choices.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:18 PM
14

Didn't they limit some sports to two athletes per country? If so that's going to bias the numbers.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:24 AM
3

They may have external female genitalia, but without an internal exam (ultrasound) it may be impossible to tell.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 08:03 PM
3

It's also that the MEDIA says that they are negative, that they have a "misogynistic agenda" etc
/r/MensRights26/07/24 08:05 PM
2

Common in people that make a lot of money.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 08:10 PM
20

Grow yes. Marry and support takes far more.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:29 AM
4

Now? Yes. Or in the UK a "reportable non-crime incident".
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:59 PM
11

Partly, but also they know they can get away with it, no one is going to pull them up, no one is going to call the cops, or if they do the cops aren't going to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:47 PM
5

It's the Marxist oppressor/oppressed dynamic they cannot be the oppressed with out the oppressor so they can never accept that men are victims to.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 08:09 PM
14

Also more stable and reliable, they still want to FUCK an unreliable chad but they want the reliable older guy to fall back on.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 06:35 AM
3

And if that fear is based on what the mother is feeding the child?
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:57 AM
8

Oh they understand, but admitting it would undermine feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights26/06/24 10:41 PM
1

The term is "Texas sharpshooting" they don't want an answer, they want confirmation of their own bias.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:37 PM
2

No sweaty men are the ENEMY /s
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:35 PM
2

The fields are saturated with progressive feminism, you can't make it through the courses unless you're an "orthodox feminist".
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:34 PM
11

Really? How many movies or shows of the last 10 years have made a joke of violence against women.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:58 AM
43

He should INSIST on doing the dishes, to HER satisfaction, after an 8hr work day. /s
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:17 AM
34

No one cares about men, but they do about women, if you say that you'll help women you'll get votes, if you say you'll help men, you'll probably lose them.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:25 PM
35

Well yes, they think it will get them laid.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:07 AM
12

Marxism decides on the value of the classes, that is what classes should be raised up which should be suppressed, or destroyed.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:06 AM
3

Hell here you are considered married as far as legal status if you're together for 2 years.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 03:34 AM
5

Not in it's current incarnation, any ideology that asserts that men are violent, privileged, woman haters and that the system needs to "uplift women" for "equality" but only in areas that they choose is never going to be able to co-exist.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 11:39 PM
9

I've heard this in person, that MRA's are "not interested in men's rights or they'd be feminists".
/r/MensRights15/05/24 08:11 PM
1

Or maybe because they can be quite high, like 21, it's 16 here which is reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:46 PM
6

Some of them do, most are simply not able to compete in the dating market for some reason.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:47 PM
7

What type? Actual incels or the guys who are labeled that way?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:32 PM
-1

It's risk avoidance, if ANYTHING goes wrong, and they can, that can effect the Dr or the business, insurance rates, litigation etc
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:57 PM
6

It required exploratory surgery, that's not a simple process, it's a risky one, so it takes a long time, trying to exclude all the things it could be, that DON'T require surgery.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:48 PM
3

It works like this, endo, amongst others, are difficult to diagnose, there are no simple tests for it, the final diagnosis requires abdominal surgery and a biopsy.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:45 PM
1

TBF they were generally fun in bed.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 07:43 PM
2

Depends what degree they do, there are plenty of worthwhile degrees, but most aren't.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:56 PM
8

China and India were able to prioritize their male lives over their female lives when their times were tough and their conditions demanded it. Not so much "tough" but it was a matter of value, males were more valuable to peasants than females because they could work harder, so it was still "disposability" at 1st, males were work animals, but it became a cultural value, at least for peasants.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 09:47 PM
7

More that it NO LONGER applies, that "culture" and religion can override basic instinct, keep in mind that many people hid the birth of their daughters from the state in China.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:25 PM
17

They "appeal to men" by a)Appealing to women and expecting men to follow along for tail. b)Getting women to shame men into complying.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 06:13 AM
1

Yeah, at a later point, I doubt they'll include it.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 04:54 AM
13

It's power without responsibility, they want all of the power and to have big daddy government take care of all the problems.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:49 AM
2

Same reason that they have cheap drinks for women, getting women into a bar (note that this is at a club) means more men, and men spend money, on women, I saw a picture from a woman's only club, it was a line of women on their phones waiting for someone else to pay.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:42 AM
2

If you mean from a man from a female partner, yes, from a male one they are MORE likely to, but that's a less common pairing usually.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:34 PM
3

It, like protesting pretty much anything, puts you around a lot of shallow thinking modern women, if your hot, and an "ally" they will fuck you, but it's the "hot" part that matters.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:36 PM
5

Well a guy PRETENDING to be a feminist could get somewhere, as long as he's hot, same with pretending to care about climate change or anything else really.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:41 PM
21

Ahh but that would be admitting the "friend zone" is real, but it's been declared a "misogynistic hoax".
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:39 PM
1

No. More pointing out that it's unlikely to be a "movement" and more likely random twats.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 04:53 AM
1

Given that these woman walk it off they aren't trying that hard, plenty of men end up in hospital from the same thing.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:28 PM
2

Not the same thing, you don't detect what you don't test for.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:24 PM
6

Sure, how many countries test for it? Lots. So it's a commonly detected cancer.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:51 PM
6

You'd be correct if that was the companies goal, it's not, THEIR goal is to get their product to market.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:49 PM
40

Technically I'm left of center, but the left has gone so far left it's pulled the center past me.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:45 AM
16

Yup an ex of mine used an industrial strength vibrator, hard to compete with that.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:41 PM
2

Easy they aren't sexy, that's it, modern women particularly want it "all" they might say they want a "partner" but if you don't make her pussy wet she's not interested.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:15 PM
27

It's, I'm not sure if there's a term, I call it ideological drift, but the "center point" moves away from the center, so first gay men are an oppressed minority, but then it moves and since they are men, and therefore "inherently privileged" they are no longer "part of the club" unless they are also a minority, and then it drifts further and THAT no longer matters.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:29 AM
2

No,no,no they are trying to justify getting rid of male bosses, replacing them with female ones, and increasing "workplace participation".
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:38 AM
18

If certain people or groups say something then if you don't follow you will be excluded.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:36 PM
1

Sorry not outing my self on the internet, if I posted the one I know it would tell which city I'm in.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:51 AM
0

Can't help then, I'm not.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 08:12 PM
1

Depends which country your in.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:59 AM
3

There are some, but they tend to be "exclusive" high priced gyms in the central city.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:32 AM
2

Potential access to pussy.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 12:15 AM
12

The issue is the majority of mental health services are infested with progressive ideology, it would be difficult to find a provider who wouldn't want to "cure your misogyny" rather than deal with anything else.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:42 PM
5

nonconsensual sexual contact was estimated at 25.9%. Which is not he same as rape, since "sexual contact" could be a hand on the butt or a kiss, which could be defined as sexual assault, same as the new "sexual violence" which SOUNDS worse that sexual assault, but actually includes harassment, which is also very vaguely defined.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:50 PM
6

I am not aware of where the "25% of male responders approve of rape attitudes" came from. It was a "survey" done that asked complex questions that were answered on a scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" but marked on a binary, so they would mark say everything but strongly disagree as "yes".
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:45 PM
6

With men's money.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 04:03 AM
2

You'd certainly think so or the "born this way" argument falls flat.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:51 PM
2

In which context? Where? Trying to get a scholarship? Well there aren't any for just being a white male, plenty if you manage to find some "native ancestry", or can tick a couple of DEI boxes.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:49 AM
0

In which context? In which country? In which state? Want a job at Disney as an animator? Well fuck off if your a white male, because of DEI, declare yourself a non-binary pan-sexual, now you tick two diversity boxes.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:47 AM
20

Not necessarily but when you have a society that says "man bed, white straight man worse" then "joining the winning side" by saying you're bi or non-binary is a potential move.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:05 AM
49

So? Even if they don't want them they want the power to dismiss them.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 07:23 PM
3

Perhaps, but life threatening and risk serious injury are different, if she pulls a weapon it's a different ball game.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:54 PM
14

I'm a rational person, I looked at the claims being made, look at the other side and analyzed the data, it was really the "wage gap" that did it for me, the fact that people STILL use it when it's so obviously flawed.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:37 PM
8

Their view of "male privilege" especially "white male privilege" means that they consider that no men need help, or deserve it, or at he very least men should shut up until every woman issue is fixed, and then they'll be more issues as the gravy train continues.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:48 PM
3

It's nothing, or little, to do with indoctrination, it's mostly biological, it's common in basically all cultures, throughout history, there are few exceptions, and THOSE tend to be cultural.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:15 PM
3

It's not boredom, it's the struggle to stay relevant, as women gained equality feminists were in danger of losing the gravy train.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:41 PM
4

Remember the video of white people with their arms out chanting "Black lives matter: while bowing before black activists, same cult energy.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:02 PM
30

Oh and from pretty wealthy backhgrounds.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:01 PM
1

The argument is that the lack of spending on "woman's health" (factually untrue) has lead to poorer outcomes for women, you can't assume that without accounting for ALL the confounding variables.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:58 AM
3

Outcomes cannot be assumed to be caused by different spending, correlation and all that.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:20 AM
1

We weren't talking about cheating specifically, there is a push against age gaps as small as 7+ years, with people calling it "pedo adjacent".
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:27 PM
77

It's just another method of control, younger women are interested in older men due to their experience and resources, this reduces the dating pool for older women, so they want to embarrass men from dating younger women.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:11 AM
20

Pussy pass.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:58 PM
5

OK bye troll.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:15 PM
10

You mean like 2X? That's what echo chambers do, concentrate certain viewpoints, if they NEVER have a negative view point of women, then that view point is not allowed.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:45 AM
16

If they NEVER say anything negative about women then they are an ideological group, women are people and people are sometimes cunts.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:29 AM
12

Right antibiotics were "made for men", so was insulin, atropine, etc, no. Drugs were TESTED on men because drug companies didn't want another Thalidomide scandal, and yes that did lead to some issues, but they were not "Designed for men".
/r/MensRights22/01/24 05:41 AM
5

TBF that's incorrect, cancers of the mouth, tongue, esophagus and palette all cause deaths.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 05:37 AM
9

The stats say that "unhappiness" accounts for a majority, and then blames the men.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:30 PM
7

Oh it's worse than that, there is no LEGAL standard for too drunk to consent, obviously a passed out woman can't, but how many drinks is too many? Moreover MEN are NEVER given the benefit of this, that is a guys alcohol consumption is never considered, either in terms of a mitigating factor, or making them the victim.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:29 AM
5

when it's offered. That's the key here.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 07:36 PM
4

Bacteria, introduced by dirty needles in this case, growing on the heart valve.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:37 PM
5

This is an example of ideological capture, the people who run them are pretty much all progressive intersectional feminists.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 07:22 PM
-6

That doesn't mean they have squat to do with the day to day operations, all they care about is money, make money or they fire you, look at who sets the policies in terms of what they sell and how they sell it.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:03 AM
-5

You can own a business and have it managed/run by others, you don't make day to day decisions about the product, how it's marketed etc
/r/MensRights09/01/24 05:12 AM
-4

Male owned, is not male run.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 04:56 AM
8

They have, as with racist, fascist etc, redefined the term in such a way as to fit people they don't like into it, to make it a propaganda weapon, don't accpet THEIR terms.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:37 PM
65

The issue is, in a situation like that, it could EASILY start a fight, even if she didn't have a boyfriend all she has to do is start screaming and some white knight will step up.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:56 AM
3

Remember that media is a prime example of institutional capture, they toe the line when it comes to this, thus every new Marvel product is a triumph etc
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:03 PM
1

Avoid anyone who voluntarily states their pronouns, like "I'm X my pronouns are Y,Z".
/r/MensRights03/01/24 06:42 PM
6

Yeah they all want a piece of the guy with the high income, but they also want multiple guys to carry out their whims. Polyamerous arrangements typically come in two flavors. 1 rich "attractive" guy with multiple women, one woman with multiple "below average" men.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:31 PM
6

Remember they think THEY will be the ones with harems, multiple men at their beck and call.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:21 PM
11

Given that men are TOLD that they should "become a woman's friend" it can be less about faking it and more "Acting he way they have been told to act", and being pissed when it doesn't work, I mean it almost never does, but people keep trotting it out as life advice.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:38 PM
3

In my country 60% of the health dollar is spent on woman's health, more than all other groups, we have 2 cancer screening programs for female dominated cancers, vaccinations, special clinics, all for female health. Nothing for male.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 01:03 AM
3

health gaps Get back to me when there are nation wide campaigns to screen for/eliminate prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:10 AM
14

Well yes, you see THEN they'll point out that they aren't being promoted at the same rate, which is obviously sexism and nothing to do with merit.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 07:20 PM
8

One of the greatest concentrations of sex hormone receptors is the brain, while the STRUCTURAL differences are minor, but detectable, the FUNCTIONAL differences are significant, as seen in a variety of studies.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 06:48 PM
1

They have a list of what hey can, and cannot, have female characters do/experience, and it's rather limiting.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 12:53 AM
1

It's a bit like the devil, they need something to pin evil on.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:15 PM
1

I remember reading it increases the risk of thrush and UTIs.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:47 AM
1

I've also been told that by women, they prefer skin to skin.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:48 PM
7

In my country you are assumed to be "married" from a property, child and financial standpoint if you live in the "nature of a marriage" for 2 years, expect that and worse.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 10:34 PM
38

Please. Laws will be passed "Prioritizing women's right to happiness" at eh expense of men, expect tightening of divorce and child support laws, including forcing sperm donors to pay for "their" children.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:54 PM
7

Except they don't care, as long as it's men that are dying, I mean they have more important things to protest, like AC settings.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 06:30 PM
30

It's mutilation, the removal of healthy tissue, " an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal.".
/r/MensRights15/12/23 06:16 PM
0

Oh I agree, but it can involve the foreskin, particular in moribund patients, and removal of the dead tissue is required.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 03:47 AM
0

Or Fournier's gangrene, as well as a few others.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:04 PM
12

TBF that is untrue there are SOME cases where it's the correct solution, not many, but some, the same can be said for amputation etc
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:16 AM
17

The heterosexual male brain is literally WIRED t respond to the female form, this has been shown in CONGENITALLY BLIND MEN.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:01 AM
8

Unlikely to be illegal, many countries would support the woman.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 04:53 AM
84

Apex fallacy, they only look at the top.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 05:39 PM
11

Revenge porn laws are a thing.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 05:33 PM
13

Technically not black, Indian, but still a race swap.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:14 PM
14

Yup tried to point this out to someone about Reacher, I asked "How many of the bad guys are black, in the American south?" there's like two and they are both in the prison scene.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:13 PM
7

And women didn't do 10%.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 06:37 PM
40

They work in high income, therefore high tax, industries, got to keep the hamsters going.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 11:50 PM
2

They are better with some types of pain, long term as I recall, men do better with traumatic pain.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 07:20 PM
4

How is it a conspiracy theory? They are pumping out woke shite and then saying the audience is wrong for not liking it, the last episode of Dr Who is typical of this, as was "The Marvels".
/r/MensRights07/12/23 08:16 PM
4

You've seen Disney lately right? There is a sector within these businesses that don't care about making quality, they care about getting the message across, and will happily promote crap to do so.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:52 PM
6

Amazon? https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/workplace/diversity-equity-and-inclusion They are woke, as are many large companies, Google etc gotta chase that sweet ESG money.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:32 PM
7

It's not just feminist, it's also progressive ideology, even decent authors will "jump the progressive shark" at a certain point in order to try to be nominate. I saw it happen with The Laundry Files, where the main character was replaced with a female one, and one book had a chapter that was completely unrelated to the rest of the book with a Transwoman and how the protagonists parents (average British stand ins) were so hopelessly bigoted.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:27 PM
5

I only learn about new authors (to me) by downloading free amazon books by way of ereaderiq.com Right so there is a filter in place to ensure "representation" which means that you're only getting to see what they want you to.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:22 PM
11

Basically no white male authors get nominated anymore, much less win Untrue. As long as they have the right progressive message they can be nominated, they are still largely shit.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:21 PM
21

Not really new, female tourists are renowned as being "easy", the lack of risk of adverse social impacts due to the lack of their normal peer groups increases their promiscuity.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 07:24 AM
13

Not necessarily "Sexual violence" often includes harassment. https://www.rainn.org/types-sexual-violence
/r/MensRights29/11/23 05:39 PM
6

That would be anywhere in my country, it's defined by the feeling of the claimant.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 08:00 AM
16

Which means they are dictating who can stand in an electorate based on sex, not ability, I mean they are politicians so ability is pretty irrelevant anyway I suppose,
/r/MensRights25/11/23 08:42 AM
16

Right so if you vote for someone, but they need to make a quota so your vote doesn't mean anything because we're putting in someone you didn't vote for.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 08:36 AM
19

TBF that was the British propaganda about Napoleon, that he was short, had a small dick etc
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:03 PM
2

Not just dating, look at tertiary education, there are numerous scholarships for women, none for just being a man.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:50 PM
0

People don't like this sub, to anyone on the "left" right wing is bad, ergo this sub is "right wing", not because it is but because it's bad.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:42 PM
1

Almost certainly not holding up in court "He forced/coerced me into consenting".
/r/MensRights18/11/23 12:11 AM
17

People on the spectrum tend to have strong belief in what is "right" logical and supported by facts, feminist ideology, in fact all progressive ideology, is based on feelings
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:52 AM
26

It's the "Mod Filter" many of the mods are "progressive" and ban anyone who says anything they disagree with, I received a 7 day ban from r/Science for pointing out that a "science" post was poorly disguised feminist propaganda, as is much social science.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 07:58 PM
15

Nah women typically believe bullshit more than men, more likely to believe in horoscopes, crystal healing etc.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:38 AM
1

How often does it needs to happen, given the consequences, for it to be a problem, the SYSTEM in the West empowers this kind of behavior.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 06:52 AM
8

TBF I DON'T think it's that clear cut, the issue is that people seem to think there IS, and that guys (and only guys) should be able to tell.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 08:42 PM
11

I agree BUT how do you determine "to drunk to consent"? Passed out is obvious, but there's a line in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:34 PM
1

Well my understanding is that most threats come from a limited number of countries, I haven't heard of any Indonesian threats.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 05:38 PM
4

Nope I've heard patriarchy in person, and from a couple of Green politicians.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:45 AM
7

Wages are based on the minimum amount required to get someone to do a job, what you are wiling to accept to do it, low skilled work (cleaning) is low paid, jobs are not paid based on certain peoples perception of their "value" particularly when there is no easy to measure metric of said "value". Sonagraphers and dental hygienists are very well paid, and almost all women.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:37 AM
1

Depends on the situation, men are half the worlds population, Muslims are significantly less, you aren't going to arrest a Muslim for walking down the street, you should look closely if they are trying to but fertilizer in bulk.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:28 AM
1

If your monitoring who goes into a country and a group of people has a large percentage of people that have threatened the country you pay more attention to that group, very few Australian terrorists.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 05:33 PM
1

And at an airport how can we tell the difference?
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:28 PM
0

TBF if Muslims are making threats against your country or people it makes sense to give them special scrutiny.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:00 AM
3

Make it about facts not feelings, no gender ideology, no progressive ideology, just the facts and skills (I'd include classes on budgeting, cooking, nutrition etc).
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:35 AM
31

Which is the point same as the "sexual violence" tag that include everything from sexual assault to cat calling to inflate numbers, it's easy to say "1in 3 women are the subject of sexual violence" when that include being stared at.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 12:21 AM
5

This is common in the social "sciences" use a flawed study that supports your preexisting bias then "refine the data" to bolster the flawed premise.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:37 PM
6

"But I made my interest really clear I looked at him for seconds".
/r/MensRights30/09/23 08:55 PM
1

Look up transmaxers, the fact that people can STATE they are only doing it for the advantage it gives them and people will still push it tells you everything.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 08:15 PM
28

Except men never will be.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:50 PM
2

It's part of the "older men are only into younger women because they are pedos/want to dominate women" narrative.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 08:36 PM
1

Fair call.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:13 PM
1

Right, I will bet money that that gets challenged if we ever get autonomous wombs, it already has been.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:59 AM
1

That wasn't my question. If a woman sells or donates an egg who does it belong to?
/r/MensRights26/09/23 05:24 AM
1

Right, so if it's donated, who does it belong to now? If it's sold?
/r/MensRights25/09/23 07:30 PM
15

Morality is subjective, those are religious authoritarian states, if you're happy with that move there, while I don't support the rampant progressive feminism, nor do I support authoritarian regimes.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:42 PM
6

Wars are started by governments and religions/ideologies more often than not.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:17 AM
1

Are there still boots on the ground? Having mixed units has been shown to be detrimental.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:44 AM
-5

Even as a supporter of Men's rights I'm against that, as it would make the Ukrainian forces less effective, by all means have women doing the logistics, medical aid, communications etc, but having them on the front line is detrimental.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:32 AM
0

Expect there to be a law put in place around who ova belong to, and who can access them.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:00 PM
1

Depends, sex can be fun, if you have a regular fuck buddy I can see why not wanting to actually fuck would be an issue.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:38 AM
5

No but Western society is.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:40 PM
1

Sure then pass laws where a guy choosing to not have kids is "domestic abuse" and using contraception against her wishes is to.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:28 PM
13

You mean like a simultaneous media blitz and a "documentary" all coming out at the same time?
/r/MensRights18/09/23 11:42 PM
7

So she lost her job? Her career is in shambles?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 07:41 PM
1

Marriage therapist is code for female empowerment specialist.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 06:33 AM
16

Depends which bits. Are women driven by base instincts and can understanding those benefit men? Yes. Women like men have underlying drives and motivations, and like men while they are not a monolith understanding these can be useful.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:36 AM
5

I've heard similar. basically "the Patriarchy want's women reliant on men".
/r/MensRights15/09/23 08:10 PM
4

It's part of it, it's "breaking a woman down to her biology".
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:09 PM
6

Average gender pay gap The individual employer’s average gender pay gap will be expressed as a percentage and the average dollar difference between women’s and men’s earnings at an organisation. The average describes the average number in a group. It is calculated by adding all the numbers in a group and dividing the sum by the number in the group. Median gender pay gap The individual employer’s median gender pay gap will be expressed as a percentage and the average dollar difference between wom…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 08:52 AM
70

Ideological drift, as the demands become mainsteam and largely "solved" they push for more extremes to be seen as "edgy" and also to keep that sweet sweet money flowing.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:59 AM
13

India, like many countries, has laws that explicitly target men, and help women, yes shit happens to women, shit happens to men, it just doesn't make the news.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 08:18 PM
8

Remember that "accuser" = "victim" for them, so any criticism of an accusation is "victim blaming".
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:26 PM
17

That's pre-meditation.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 03:08 AM
22

Right, so point to the media representation of male suffering.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:17 PM
0

It's one of the areas, along with education, that has been heavily ideologically captured, you either praise the sisterhood or you get removed one way or another.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:52 AM
2

Sure and when were women ever subject to the draft? Men still are. And no one has claimed that "It never happened".
/r/MensRights26/08/23 09:16 PM
12

They don't HAVE female "friends" they are orbiters, they say what they think will get them laid.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:23 PM
1

Those are gone, I said BEING enforced. Name for me laws that oppress men. Depends where you live in the US you have the draft, and child support laws that force the victims of female on male rape to pay for the children produced, in other countries you have specific crimes that only males can be convicted of.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:09 PM
12

Sure. What laws have been passed in Western countries to support men and oppress women?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:15 AM
1

This looks like a "give a spread of results but measure on a binary" to me, they have a "1-5" score but mark it yes/no.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 08:53 PM
10

Yes, which is why they are pushing for female quotas in THOSE STEM classes.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 08:42 PM
6

who choose pills, cutting wrists (very low success rate). Particularly when you then call your ex-boyfriend to tell him how much he'll miss you when you're gone.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 01:50 AM
6

No, men are more likely to have the traits necessary to become a CEO, such as being willing to work 80hr weeks.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 04:43 AM
8

TBF it may just be the guy, I almost never come from sex oral or otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:36 PM
25

Remember they are CONSTANTLY told that they are oppressed, even when they can't point to a specific example.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:31 PM
8

There's a lot of age related preferences there, young women, under ~35 prefer PHYSICAL attributes, a major one is height, Asian men tend to be shorter.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:11 PM
32

They are progressives, and progressives live by the progressive stack, in that form white men are the absolute worst, it's also why they will defend Islam, since it's practiced by mostly non-whites, if they point out it's issues they will be "excluded" from the movement. Typical cult like behavior.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 06:46 PM
7

She probably has simps praising her on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 07:02 AM
4

Yes to control breeding rights, and I say that as both an atheist and an MRA.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:37 PM
1

Sure. But they are not objective, they are subjective, an example is how they react to a man touching them, if the guy is attractive it's "hot" if not it's creepy.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:15 PM
6

Well no as they are "not the primary caregiver" see it's interesting how the mothers are simultaneously being punished by not having to work, but are the most important part of a child's life, by not working.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:39 PM
18

They have redefined "Creepy" as "anything, no matter how minor, that I disapprove of", it's not about what is actually creepy, it's about control.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:07 PM
1

Or maybe it's due to redefining "violence" such as "sexual violence" sounds bad right, sounds WORSE than sexual assault, but it INCLUDES sexual assault as well as "harassment" "objectification" etc.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:19 PM
1

What? Where are the male specialties in hospitals? Obstetrics and gynecology, even breast specialists, nothing for men. Where are the prostate cancer screening programs? Here we have both breast and cervical cancer programs, nothing for prostate, hell nothing nation wide for colon cancer.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:02 PM
1

You think this would ever be applied with a male teacher and female student?
/r/MensRights21/07/23 08:54 PM
16

Sounds like she was promoted because she was female, not any form of skill.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:06 PM
5

That's the basis for the evolutionary impact of attractiveness, the genes that are passed on are those WOMEN find attractive.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:54 PM
12

In response a law was immediately passed requiring that all evidence the prosecution is going to use against an accuser must be shared with defense before cross can occur, I think you have that backward all evidence the DEFENSE is going to use has to be passed on, Ghomeshi was the defendant.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:00 PM
2

And where do they mention the sex of the victims?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:16 PM
10

It's a virtue signal "Look how progressive and inclusive we are".
/r/MensRights13/07/23 07:44 PM
8

The term is "ideological capture" feminists infiltrate groups and corrupt it from within, often using social isolationism, rumormongering and pro-female bias to exclude anyone that doesn't toe the line. They take over organizing and moderating, they bring in more "like minded people" and force out moderates, and soon you have a leftwing, pro-feminist organization/group/ideology where all dissenting voices are removed or silenced.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:49 AM
18

All? No. Enough in positions of authority? Yes. Look at Scotland, they have made it a crime to "Discus sexual conquests in the presence of a woman".
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:40 AM
17

They will ban you in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:31 AM
2

6'3" is not, it's tall for MEN.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:29 AM
5

Yeesssss. Sort of. When they can't meet the RIGHT man, by THEIR definition. But it's more likely they will "not be in a relationship" but just fucking around.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 09:27 PM
1

It's not that hyperbolic, that's the goal of many "reforms" around sexual assault cases, you know not being able to cross examine accusers, not being able to refer to "past sexual history" those sorts of things.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:47 AM
1

Remember they are looking at OUTCOMES not INPUTS that's why equity is being pushed so hard. From their perspective if a woman isn't making as much as a man it's a barrier, no mention of differences in job or hours worked, if a woman isn't in a management position it's "barriers" not effort etc.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:55 PM
3

It won't be, it will be phrased something like "against protected minorities" which women are but men are not.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:01 PM
186

Well yes, INTERSECTIONAL feminism, as lesbians they are "MORE OPPRESSED" and therefore need MORE leniency. /s
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:56 PM
7

Easy, Boys are bad, we'll fix them, to OUR standards.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:33 AM
4

Yup seen this in woke writing as well, the "heroes" are female or "non traditional" men, any "typically masculine" man is likely to be bad/evil.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:33 AM
3

That's kind of my point they make generalizations, even within fields, let alone between them.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 01:26 AM
7

They define "the same" very broadly two Dr's are the same when one is a pediatrician working 40 hrs a week and the other is an Orthopedic surgeon working 60.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 09:22 PM
2

Right so physical, good to know.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 07:58 PM
9

Possibly but "attraction" is rather vague, do they mean physical? That's how it's typically represented for women.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 10:38 AM
81

More likely there was NO difference, so the attractiveness never mattered.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:42 PM
2

Still better than being stabbed, using the outside of the forearm, there's not a lot of really vulnerable vessels there.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:40 PM
1

We don't know the context of the questions or the actual demographics of the replies so we can't really draw much from the results, it was suggested that given the immigration demographics they may be picking up a large Muslim population (mostly young men).
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:39 PM
1

It's not just men's rights, it's anything that goes against the progressive ideology, I provided evidence against a poster on a trans "rights" issue, they stated that the site was "transphobic" as it didn't support trans identity so it was invalid. It's echo chamber thinking at it's worst.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 12:49 AM
0

I've tried, but it's like trying to be friends with an evangelical christian, they have a twisted world view and see everything through it.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:36 PM
-10

Well TBF they DID invent the industrial revolution. ​ EDIT: I take it the /s was required?
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:48 PM
10

Wont matter some places, they can just claim they were coerced into agreeing, or even that they withdrew consent afterward for "reasons".
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:42 PM
21

It's part of the "blank slate" hypothesis, basically it's a from of special pleading where somehow humans are not animals with animal instincts.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 08:40 PM
11

Depends on who works, and who doesn't, and the jobs, should a man do half the chores if he works a 40hr week and the woman is a housewife?
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:34 PM
17

No point. This isn't about facts, it's about feelings, no amount of evidence will matter.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 04:27 AM
4

The feminist rhetoric is that "Men's Rights means patriarchy", "Men are ALREADY a PRIVILEGED class", "Men's rights advocates want to subjugate women" etc, and now we have INTERSECTIONAL feminism, so it's "part" of the LGBTI etc movement. If you watched the "debate" with Pearl and the feminists you'd see this in action "As a woman of color", "As a disabled woman" etc
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:38 PM
1

Thomas Sowell is a rich white woman?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 05:37 AM
1

No. The truth is. EVERYONE were slaves as far as race went, at various times, but the RICH avoided it like they do all the other shit in the world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyPWjjWs7-w
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:29 PM
21

Rich PEOPLE weren't, poor people were, when Europeans were taken as slaves it wasn't the rich and powerful, same in Africa.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:24 AM
2

They are already pushing "equity education" where "merit" is replaced with "equitable marking" so of course boys "innate privilege" means they will be marked down.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 06:46 PM
1

They still wouldn't, that's "boring" they tend to prefer jobs that involve people.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 08:58 PM
2

Someone described it as the "Big tent" to be part of the group you have to accept ALL the intersectional viewpoints, eventually this will start to include (if it already hasn't) things many people will find repellent, then we might see change.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 08:47 PM
-7

TBF the reasoning is that they use fewer resources so it's cheaper.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:57 AM
9

And no examination of WHY? As in "what was their reason for being their?"
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:39 PM
2

Please. Geocentrism says that the guy is ALWAYS at fault, even in self defense.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 04:18 AM
4

Well yes it's literally the "...women most effected" meme.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 08:38 PM
9

1 day old account, don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 09:02 PM
1

If they go the way of Spain with "specially trained judges" it will not go well for accused men.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:50 PM
2

Sure, right up until it happens, then "Umm actually..."
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:46 PM
6

Or the state will take it, for "equality".
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:30 PM
0

True. But if she BELIEVES that "He's out there for her" and "She deserves him" then she will dump a "decent" man for the chance.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 07:52 PM
1

Why? Easy. Because she has been sold the idea that she "Deserves the perfect man", if he won't change his life style he has to go.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:54 AM
4

That's kind of the point with these proposed law changes, "MAKE it a crime to say X because we don't like that it isn't already."
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:32 PM
1

If that's the case I imagine it's because they are committing more, but given that for example Scotland want's to close ALL women's prisons, and Spain has special courts it's hardly that the system is harsher on them.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 08:01 PM
1

You think women are going to be more fair? Nope, they exhibit a strong in group bias, the entire feminist movement is running on propaganda and lies in the West, the "war" can never end, otherwise the money dries up.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:51 PM
2

Yeah the "women are wonderful effect" well documented.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:08 AM
1

Nope. Her being a woman has a huge impact, an average of a 40% reduction in sentence length, and men can't get pregnant so it's not a trick they can play. Now having money and a good lawyer certainly helps, but plenty of women get away with literal murder when men don't.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:21 PM
20

You think this would apply to women? No. See what they FEEL is TRUTH, their truth, but truth.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:08 PM
2

Sure. The fact that she's a "mother" made no difference /s
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:17 PM
18

For long term? No. But woman are even MORE likely to sleep around when traveling, so they will certainly fuck them.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 06:21 PM
2

That's strawmanning, see my above example of how it used in reality.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:08 AM
6

Or legally "victim/survivor" instead of "accuser".
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:07 AM
7

Did you se the part where they said individuals and leaders? When prominent individuals make these statements that makes the group as a whole a hate movement.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:09 PM
1

They're not "offensive" just inaccurate and plebeian.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:03 PM
43

TBF there are many woman who consider being negative about a woman, no matter the situation, abusive/misogynistic.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:23 PM
1

So we can blame a handful of greedy capitalists who are mostly male, and pretty much all women who demand ever increasing amounts of wealth to do what could be free. Is this supposed to be sarcasm?
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:43 AM
1

Right so when women spend 80% of the consumer dollar it's men's fault because they provide the money.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 11:23 PM
5

Sure. That's why taking some "pills" and calling an ex to tell them is an "attempt", or cutting your arm (even if it's no where near a major blood vessel) is regarded as an "attempt".
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:41 AM
6

ALL women? No. MOST? Yes. If 90% of women act and think the same way then that's the basis you need to use for your decisions.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 09:36 PM
1

Ah so a woman that transitioned to a "man"? I got that the wrong way around.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 12:41 AM
2

Trans woman, but that also isn't mentioned a lot, especially by left wing sources.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 07:13 PM
4

They are indoctrinated by the system that trains them, at every level.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 08:07 PM
11

Shhhhh those facts don't suit the narrative, rather like not mentioning the Maori practice of taking sex slaves after tribal war, oh and killing young children.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:48 AM
20

Males, yes. White males, no. "Whites" make up ~15% of the worlds population and places like Africa and the Middle East have much higher rates of violence.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:46 AM
20

Men will do what they think will get them laid, I had a friend lie about being vegan.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 05:31 PM
35

Because it's better to investigate a likely fraudulent claim than be seen to be "soft on rapists".
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:09 PM
4

My bet claiming post-partum depression, so she's not guilty on the basis of temporary insanity.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:28 PM
7

No because if this was the case, mens rates would be declining. Men's rates ARE declining, and I can only speak about my own country but they changed how things were taught decades ago to "close the gap between boys and girls", fewer exams, more collaborative work etc. Now girls out perform boys, but the "issue isn't the system, boys need to apply themselves more".
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:00 AM
91

In reality, yes. But they will simply redefine it so that ONLY women can be victims.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 05:33 PM
2

Similar? It IS fascistic rhetoric, there have been those elements in it from the beginning, and that's even more true across the breadth of the progressive ideology.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:36 AM
1

Oh there are some that do, but just not the ones in power, again I can use religion as an analogy, the people running the show are the most "faithful" and dogmatic, with the "purest" viewpoint, untainted by actual evidence. And the most radical will always push for their view point to be the only one. Also remember that there are a lot of people involved who are absolutely convinced that men, specifically white men, are the cause of all "evil", so that's who they target, and they will twist EVER…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:46 PM
7

Yup. It's amazing how wealth is never seen as a privilege, but skin color and sex are.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:41 PM
6

Well yes, but only against "privileged classes" so it's fine /s
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:39 PM
1

Because they "know" why, feminist theory tells them why, they aren't going to pollute that with actual evidence, it's why I regard the "woke" movement, which this is part of, as a religion without a god. What we are talking about here is dogmatic belief, they "know" the correct answer, any other position is "heresy".
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:34 PM
1

I mean quotas but only in government/management/high salary positions, no one is going to be making quotas for women in bricklaying, there are already plenty of jobs that are mainly done by women that pay well, the "wage gap" is bullshit and based on a gross average.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:30 PM
10

I think people misunderstood, I was framing it in THEIR frame of reference, I can see why they SHOULD talk to "incels" but their world view says that incels are the offenders and have "no part in the conversation".
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:10 AM
6

Well why would they speak to the "violent potential offenders" as opposed to the "victims".
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:38 AM
6

since those would happen to people arrested for a sexual offence, Not necessarily, you could be "Invited to talk to police", you'd be an idiot to, but it does happen. nor the "training", Depends on the training, I would bet you a doller this is the same sort of "training" (read indoctrination) they have in the Spanish courts, based on feminist theory.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:37 AM
9

Quotas. But only for women in high powered/payed jobs.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:34 AM
22

Well yes, because otherwise they'd have to look at WHY men are doing these things, just saying "INCEL" and leaving it at that is much easier.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:33 AM
7

Remember it's switched from "Women are paid less for the same job" to "Women's jobs are paid less" moving the goal posts.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 05:45 PM
2

I also can be characterized as white, straight, western, brown haired,green eyed; And yet I bear no Sin for these, only my gender. Nope sorry you are also at fault for being white and straight, what do you think white privilege is?
/r/MensRights13/03/23 06:16 AM
2

They are examples of gendered law, that's what you asked for.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:26 AM
12

Almost the reverse, they ARE intelligent, but they are also indoctrinated, now think about how women are "educated" now in universities?
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:46 AM
41

The thing is I've met people, mostly women, that aren't stupid, but simply flat out refuse to accept certain things when it goes against their ideology, I know a very smart medical scientist that doesn't believe in evolution because it goes against her religious views. Same thing here.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 07:16 PM
58

Intelligence is not the issue, ideological blindness is, she simply can't see the issue.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:55 PM
2

As in laws about who can be drafted, see the Ukraine.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 04:12 AM
4

They have just replaced "God" with "Progressive values", both ideologies.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 03:53 AM
6

They are conditioned, indoctrinated, to believe that the progressive movement is "Morally correct" regardless of how it will hurt them.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 09:30 PM
8

Or the draft laws, in some countries they have specific "Male assaults female laws" etc
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:51 PM
31

Specific laws that are sex based.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:05 PM
12

The issue is that all the MEN they are interested in are only interested in THEM for sex, when you are restricting yourself to the top 20% of men they have all the options, why are they going to settle for you?
/r/MensRights07/03/23 04:35 AM
5

It will drag on for another 10 years or there about, with the government robbing Peter to pay Paul, then there will be a shock, disease, major natural disaster, something, and it will come crashing down.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 05:08 AM
1

Any and all of the above. ANYTHING which reduces the number to one which can be dismissed as inconsequential.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:14 PM
15

And a woman taking a handful of pills and calling her ex-boyfriend is recorded as an attempt.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:09 AM
4

No,no look at Australia and Spain, it's World wide.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:05 AM
6

Except no one is saying it's OK to be a fat MAN.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:37 AM
8

You mean like how feminists talk about how lying about being on birth control effects men?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:20 PM
10

Same reason for opposing paternity testing.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:19 PM
5

Like I said clarify your definition do you just mean rape? Or all aspects of sexual assault? Or all aspects of violence, sexual or not?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:59 AM
1

"Sexual violence" INCLUDES harassment, maybe you mean sexual assault. https://www.rainn.org/types-sexual-violence
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:47 AM
2

Sure. Try saying that "A transwoman does not fit the biological definition of woman, and is therefore not a woman" and see how far you get.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 04:44 AM
3

They are only pro SOME science, you will also get anti-nuclear protestors, even though it's carbon free, or anti-biology, in terms of sex determination.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:23 PM
2

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2019/01/10/american-psychological-association-traditional-masculinity-harmful/2538520002/
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:24 PM
6

https://www.science.org/content/article/activists-destroy-golden-rice-field-trial Here's an example, far lest Green activists destroyed a group of genetically modified rice which was meant to help poor people avoid Vit A deficiency.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:57 AM
21

Right so women FEELING bad is presented as worse than men actually dying .
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:15 AM
2

It's part of the transnarrative by differentiating between females and "women" (which they include trans women in) you are excluding transwomen from "femininity".
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:45 AM
1

Yeah I always thought that something along the lines of "We have something they do not, creativity." would have been better.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:26 PM
4

EVERYONE, other than the nobility and rich merchants, was oppressed, men and women, female nobility had far more power than male peasants.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:36 AM
2

Please, that has every hallmark of a made up story for attention.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:25 PM
15

One of the "problems" I think is that women are far more likely to be interested in this profession, And yet there are no calls for male quotas.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 05:44 PM
24

Nope, because "men cannot be the victims/women cannot be perpetrators" as they have redefined sexism.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 05:31 PM
3

They just redefine hate speech to exclude "being male" as a criteria.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 05:30 PM
17

Hell some will find a way to blame the "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights04/02/23 04:32 AM
2

You are correct fro the "true" definition of Incel, but not the "progressive feminist" definition.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:04 AM
2

Most likely either affirmative action (the former) and some kind of industrial work (the latter).
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:35 PM
7

Prison sentence discrepancy.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:26 AM
6

Yup either "I don't have to prove anything to you" or "I won't look at your bullshit evidence" translates to "I have no evidence to back up my world view", a good trick is to ask them, about many things, "What would convince you you are wrong?".
/r/MensRights24/01/23 07:49 AM
3

Because then it's not THEIR fault, THEY are not to blame for THEIR actions, see how easy it is, you also see this with other "marginalized groups". Fat? It's not YOUR fault it's societies, and YOU don't need to change etc
/r/MensRights23/01/23 05:23 PM
26

Nah plenty of "He's a creep" comments with even pretty small age differences, like more than 5 years and he's "a closet pedo".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 11:25 PM
6

Not if it is "restoring historical imbalances" and the like.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 06:02 AM
11

Not feminized, feminist, they are basically indoctrinated in intersectional feminism, that gives them an attitude that any issues you have are YOUR fault for being male.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 05:22 AM
1

Which is why it's now "equity" and try asking them what that looks like, the Vice panel was typical where they simply refused to answer that question and derailed.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 04:58 AM
3

There's "passive feminism" where they may not spout it, but they support it becasue of what it provides them.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:08 AM
4

It's certainly a mental condition, ideology is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:30 PM
1

The idea that they are "strong independent women" is pretty pervasive in social media, as is the idea that their success makes them attractive to the kind of men THEY find attractive, when it's almost the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 04:42 AM
5

1st you have to define work, then produce a comparable metric, then calculate how much each individual does on the basis of that metric, then compare them. "Steps taken" is pretty much irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 01:43 AM
4

Sure so define and quantify it in a comparable metric.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 01:40 AM
3

Even the "good" ones believe harmful things, and most simply never consider what they are told to any great degree.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/23 05:19 PM
15

Yes. However they believe that "women's health is underfunded" and therefore any attempt to help men must come at the expense of women, therefore it's misogynistic".
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:59 AM
3

I'd bet money on this being the mom's idea, classic "Look at me, look at me, look at me".
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:36 AM
3

Scientific american has, like many other publications, been captured by the woke left as a mouthpiece.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 05:54 PM
22

People on the autism spectrum, at least the high functioning ones (what used to be called Asperger's) tend to be logical and look at the world through a rational lens, that's why they tend to be atheists also. If you look at the world logically, without falling into group think (often because they are outside the group) then the issues with the mainstream feminist viewpoint are pretty clear, the engineer that got canned from Google for his internal memo would likely fit into this group.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:22 AM
6

Not include, they changed the entire education system to favor girls in the 80s-90s, because they were "falling behind", now they dominate but NO ONE is suggesting the system change, instead BOYS have to change.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 05:53 PM
7

They already do in many countries, they take blood at birth anyway.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 05:41 PM
1

Possibly depends HOW it's used, if it's to gain access to men's assets after their death, then it's a negative.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 04:28 AM
2

Yup. Heard that they simply don't hire men, like masseuses people simply prefer women to do this role.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:29 AM
8

Well you see because of the way it's taught it's misogynistic, as women do worse in math classes. /s
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:22 AM
1

It's the same as 2X, it's an echo chamber, that's what they want.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 04:07 AM
1

A steam room more or less.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 08:08 PM
4

Nah they are "non threatening"
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:19 PM
3

Which is what Spain DID..
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:41 PM
0

Except in many countries, the UK for one, that is no longer the case, it's fine to spew hate about men, but a crime if it's about women.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:37 PM
10

yes. Yes he does, nothing sells like outrage nowadays.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 12:05 AM
2

Actually you can make that argument, because it happened under communist rule, look at the "athletic camps" in China and Russia, you didn't get to choose to be in them, you were forced to, for the "good of the party".
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:00 PM
6

No she isn't, unless all you watch is the 1st 2 episodes, that was an idea put out by people who hadn't actually watched the show, same as the black guy who WAS a bully till about episode 4 or 5.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 11:29 PM
13

Also the classic progressive trope that only white people can be evil.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 06:55 PM
2

Really? Like the "Specially trained" judges in Spain?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 06:59 PM
9

"Violence" has been redefined by feminists, "sexual violence" now includes harassment, offensive jokes etc
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:28 AM
3

Lets see a highly technological group can't beat a bunch of aliens armed with bows and arrows, a super rare material only found under their "sacred tree".
/r/MensRights04/12/22 07:30 PM
42

It's ideological dissonance, what they believe and reality are at odds, this causes them mental trauma.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 12:30 AM
3

Agreed, there are plenty of videos of NPC feminists being asked questions like "Give an example of a right men have that you don't" and being unable to answer, it's amazing how often they suddenly "Need to go".
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:01 PM
5

So you've seen an ad stating men are victims, because I NEVER have.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:42 PM
6

Except that there is awareness on every pack of cigarettes, how many "don't bash men" ads do you see?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:11 PM
0

Remember Incel is not about the lack of sex, you could be an "ally" and sexless, but not called an Incel, Incel is basically the same as "neck beard" or "heretic".
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:09 PM
17

Sure, so find me an antifeminist mainstream paper, I'll wait.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:41 PM
32

It's the UK, they are all feminist.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:34 PM
5

Assuming it's true, a good proportion of 2X is obvious bull.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:28 AM
3

Sure, and THEY get to define who is a "vulnerable group" and it's NEVER straight white men.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:29 PM
4

And I bet if/when they end up with MORE than 50% women that will be fine.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:54 PM
14

It's not just virgins, it's any men they don't want to bone, "virgin" is just a convenient label, could also be "fuck boy".
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:50 PM
5

There may not be OFFICIAL quotas, but that doesn't mean there aren't UNOFFICIAL ones, look at all the "consultant" groups that they hire to "improve diversity and inclusion".
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:37 PM
21

Nope. The UN has a massive pro woman bias.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 07:28 PM
6

Also one of the effects of testosterone is suppression of fear.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:02 AM
1

It's also amazing how that definition gets thrown out as soon as you mention the government.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:52 AM
2

With people in mind, not men, not women.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:02 PM
1

Why the downvotes, I don't think them going to Italy is a good idea, I'm just pointing out that SA is a long way away.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 05:36 PM
-6

Maybe look at a map, Italy is pretty close to The Middle East and North Africa, South Africa is at other end of the continent.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:49 AM
-3

TBF it's a fucking long way away.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:24 PM
16

Because it's a symptom of the problem the OP is posting about.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:44 PM
48

So what's causing it? Feminism has been pushing the girls good/boys bad line for decades now, a seen in the drop off of boys performance in schools.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:43 PM
18

Not really, a LOT of books are overtly or subtly anti-male, pretty much if you want to win a Hugo award for example it HAS to be feminist/progressive.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:37 PM
11

Theoretically. Actually?
/r/MensRights06/11/22 07:16 PM
1

My point was that a guy saying "we never had sex" would not fly if HE'S the accused.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:15 PM
1

If a jury will convict a man on a 30 year old accusation with no evidence, but will not convict a woman in an ongoing case because they say they didn't have sex means that they don't care about evidence.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:05 AM
1

Which tells you a lot about juries.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:00 AM
5

Right, so if a woman claims she was raped and the accused claims they never had sex, and she can't prove they did he should get off? Because guys are being convicted on decades old charges with no physical evidence.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 06:42 PM
0

Part of the sex positive narrative is the demand for sex THEY want, which means with the top 20% of men, they just want to be able to do that without judgment, they want to be able to judge men.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:45 PM
2

Apparently there are a few mods that run multiple sub reddits, and like in many areas the woke have taken control.
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 03:53 AM
5

The 2% number is widely reported bull, and most studies only count "proven to be false" as false, add to that many departments not investigating obviously false accusations, and not calling "unsupported" accusations false.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:12 AM
1

Sure it does just change it's definition to match whatever you want to persecute.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:55 AM
1

Also because "They are no longer shackled to men" and "Because they are unhappy".
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:52 AM
1

The US, Spain others, and the official line may be "innocent until proven guilty" but take a look at the OUTCOMES, how things are played in the courts, how many men are being found guilty with no evidence at all, how many have their names dragged through the mud. One was a case where a woman charged a man with penetrating her with his fingers when the video evidence showed he merely brushed by, he was still charged.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:37 PM
2

How about re-instituting "innocent until proven guilty" currently the Duluth model and unwritten law treats men as guilty of charges of sexual assault, harassment and domestic violence.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:21 AM
-3

It's a belief not reality, at least not ENTIRELY reality, a lot of guys get no attention from women, some get a lot, that leads to an apparent unequal distribution, and you can see plenty of videos of women wanting "six, six, six", it may not even be the majority of women, but it's a significant chunk of the 16-35 year old age bracket.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:18 AM
16

It's not even sex, it's the human connection, they are repeatedly told they are "wrong" and THEY are to blame.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:14 AM
1

ROB is a Troll.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:55 PM
9

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gtyui2/350\_false\_allegations\_againt\_men\_per\_day\_in\_spain/
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:23 AM
9

Of course "men failing", "not pulling their weight", "need to do better" etc
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:26 AM
20

Two things, indoctrination, and the belief that acting that way will get them pussy.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/22 07:42 PM
4

Same problem, if you are finding people guilty on the basis of accusations and 20 year old "memories" with no physical evidence then it's not good "justice".
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:59 PM
2

The majority of FEMINISTS hate men, but there are a large portion of young women in the West that have been raised to think that THEY are victims. and all their problems are caused by men.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:01 PM
13

The issue is that there can be no physical evidence, all the evidence is 20 years old, all the memories are 20 years old, there is no way it will be accurate.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:44 PM
13

They often come up with feminist mothers, feminist teachers and feminist tertiary education, they have been indoctrinated to believe that they are constant victims and EVERYTHING that is wrong in their lives is due to men and they have NO power to change it.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 12:59 AM
4

Remember most teachers are coming up through a feminist/progressive indoctrination program disguised as tertiary education, they are CONSTANTLY told that women are oppressed and need help.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 11:56 PM
19

You would be surprised, there are plenty of people that still believe in the "wage gap" and would welcome an "equity" solution to help "raise women and their children out of poverty", even though more men are poor and homeless.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:35 PM
34

The fact that it's being PROPOSED shows the thinking of "intellectuals" (read ideologues) they are suggesting that ALL MEN pay a tax to ALL WOMEN, irregardless of the fact that on average men already pay more tax.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:14 PM
17

Misogynistic men are usually hypermasculine, promiscuous men, not virgins. ​ Depends how you define misogyny, the current definition, not agreeing with extreme progressive feminism, covers many men.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:29 AM
7

Not the hard sciences or engineering, unless they bring in quotas, which would not surprise me.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:07 PM
6

We call that an Apex fallacy the vast majority of EVERYONE was excluded, it was only the well patronized or the exceptional that were not.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:42 AM
9

Either incompetent or evil, they are not allowed to be good and competent.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:09 AM
13

Moreover it's sexist to not accept evermore change becasue you think equality has been reached.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:46 AM
2

Incels, and the opposite (?) women with a far too high (self perceived) value (I am the prize).
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:20 PM
2

And when you had to get married to have sex (more or less), when women didn't work, when they needed to be married to have children, you are right, but now in a lot of the world that is not the case. Add in the effects of social media on women's self perceived value and you get the current situation.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:31 PM
15

So what's women trying to impose THEIR version of masculinity onto men?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:39 PM
11

That's being a cunt.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:39 PM
5

Won't help, typically it's not quite that fixed.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:09 PM
3

Not just the UK.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:40 AM
3

Your point? It's a bad study due to a small sample size and self reporting.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 05:45 AM
3

And who says that "masculine gender norms" are bad, feminists, it's not "toxic masculinity" (although that exists) instead "toxic masculinity" is now "anything that feminists dislike".
/r/MensRights27/09/22 06:09 PM
2

>Participants were 127 community residents who completed self-report measures of empathy and forgiveness. That's pretty much a worthless study.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/22 06:06 PM
4

But the only thing you see now is feminist equity, you don't even see ANY pushes for helping men, quite the reverse, you can find requirements for female positions in male dominated industries, but not the reverse, in fact if men try to use "gender equality" laws those laws are removed.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:56 PM
6

If it stands for "equality" why is it pushing for "equity", but only for women?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:43 PM
1

OH I mean in ALL pregnancies.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 09:37 AM
2

"They still want white men, otherwise it wouldn’t be inclusive." I referenced people having groups of nothing but women and calling it inclusive. it is a direct rebuttable to our statement, not a strawman.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:58 AM
4

Nope it's simple, make it law that men can opt out of parenting when they are notified of the pregnancy, no "Oh by the way I had your kid, here's the bill" oh and mandatory paternity testing.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:42 AM
3

Right and I never stated that the OP's company was firing all the men, I was making a general statement, YOU asked that, that's a strawman.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:40 AM
4

Strawmanning is not going to help your cause.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:01 AM
5

Bull, you can see pictures of nothing but women and have it called "inclusive".
/r/MensRights21/09/22 09:00 PM
1

You didn't ask that you asked: What does this mean? Could you give an example? I gave two.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:19 AM
3

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/world/europe/paris-too-many-women-fine.html They repealed the law as soon as it was used against women. https://kifinfo.no/en/2016/05/sweden-ends-use-preferential-treatment "This was the start of a benchmark lawsuit. In 2007, 44 women sued the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) for unlawful gender discrimination. All the women had applied for admission to the veterinary programme in 2006 and 2007 under a separate folk high school quota scheme and…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:02 PM
3

A job is paid what they need to get someone to do it for the most part, not things like CEOs that's sort of a self fulfilling feed back loop, but everything else is "what's the minimum I can pay someone to do this" so "typical woman's jobs" are ones that they have no problem filling, a lot of "men's" jobs are dirty, dangerous or hard so they need to pay more to attract people.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:51 PM
0

Right which is why there are NO requirements for minimum numbers of men in ANY job, and no quotas for women in any dangerous or dirty job? It's why non-gendered "equality" legislation gets removed as soon as men try to use it?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:47 PM
12

Bullshit, they are KNOWN for a progressive bent.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:40 PM
8

In many countries that's not defined as rape, sexual assault yes, but when they use the term rape, it's not interchangeable.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:59 AM
32

Moreover they DEFINITION of rape excludes most male victims.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:10 AM
19

So it's an utterly biased piece, gotcha,
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:07 PM
33

Possibly, but that is not how it was applied.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:14 AM
11

Not "fake" but curated, as in "This is what WE want you to see".
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:10 AM
1

If your chances of being attacked, killed, beaten, robbed etc is less then feeling that you are more at risk is the definition of irrational, and keep in mind it's about 10% of the rate at which men are affected.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:15 AM
7

There are some things which are hard to measure. A common feminist example is "women feeling scared and anxious walking alone at night" It seems that 60% of women in the UK feel unsafe walking alone at night. This is a common claim made in good faith and it seems to be supported. Sure, but it's a FEELING, the EVIDENCE is that they are safer than men, but their "lived experience" of fear makes them act as if THEY are most at risk, see also "femicide".
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:50 PM
1

Les, it's feelings and beliefs, my answer is "They might be delusional" another way to put it is there are possibly millions of people that believe that aliens visit earth and abduct them, is that also true because of "lived experience"?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:48 PM
3

TBF that's not JUST the feminist subreddits, I got permabanned from r/energy for defending nuclear power.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:23 AM
7

Women are a "persecuted minority" as such they get special "protection".
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:21 AM
11

It's worse than that, they create new terms like "sexual violence" sounds worse than sexual assault right? But it's not it includes actions that are not as severe under a banner that sounds worse to pump up the numbers.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:43 PM
3

No it's simply making a "deduction" based on false equivalency.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:20 AM
5

Therapy means dealing with people, mostly women, who have been indoctrinated in feminist theory based bull.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:36 AM
4

Firstly the "80/20" thing is short hand for "a minority vs the majority" SOME men have lots of sexual partners. some have none, many have few. Secondly where do I think Incels come from? Well you are correct to a degree, but a lot of it comes from the LACK of culturally enforced monogamy in the younger age bracket, and social media. The idea that "all women are beautiful" and "you don't have to settle", "you can have it all" etc while simultaneously punishing any men who make a social misstep, m…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:49 AM
2

We are talking about the Western world, not the whole world, where do you think Incels come from? The statistics are clear more women are having sex than men, at least in the 15-25 year old age group. That's part of hook up culture, a relatively small number of men are getting most of the action, that's what the dating apps show. But this trend is most evident at the extremes, that is there are more men than women with no sexual partners, and more women than men with large partner counts.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:01 AM
2

Sure but it leads to a lack of social cohesion, as men who are not in the top 20 or so percent have limited opportunities.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:45 AM
1

Yes that was due to "socially enforced monogamy" which went out the window with "empowerment".
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:36 PM
94

Well white men are, according to progressives, are the most privileged group on earth and the cause of all evil.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:33 AM
2

That's kind of the issue, the lead is THE LEAD, they shouldn't be overshadowed by a co-star, but the current writing requires that, more over if the BBEG is a woman (see MoM) then they have to be a "sympathetic villain" and they can't be defeated by a male hero.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:23 PM
11

True, but that's an emergent property, they are so restricted by what they can write, and who can write it.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:18 AM
12

True, and there were also female leads, but now even the male leads often take a back seat to female "co stars".
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:21 AM
26

The major issue, as was pointed out by Nerdrotic is that they are REQUIRED to write female charters in certain ways, which pretty much makes them all Mary Sues and the shows predictable, while simultaneously stealing any thunder man may have.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:20 AM
13

Of course, any group can hold arseholes.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 08:46 PM
2

They already try that, coming up with a reason that it's not their fault.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:23 PM
2

Emotional abuse? And what does that mean? Telling her no? Calling her on her bull? Two words are very vague.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:06 AM
1

My comment was more about the lack of honesty.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:44 AM
1

Not really, they are perfectly happy to fuck SOME guys, just not MOST guys, and rather than saying "he didn't make me wet' they complain about a lack of social skills.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 09:17 AM
25

Sure SO hard for a rich ex-tennis player, cry harder.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:57 AM
9

So she won't be convicted for murder, it will be "manslaughter" as "she didn't intend to kill him" as bullshit as that is.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 11:50 PM
5

This is a feminist perspective article, basically "Its men fault they need to change" no mention of women meeting them even half way.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 08:53 PM
1

Sure because they will be able to find TONS of equally skilled, qualified and experienced women who just aren't being given a chance now.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:25 AM
10

Women bosses treat their female employees as equals or even worse It's typically that female bosses have favorites, women tend to form cliches.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/22 12:59 AM
1

Nice to hear.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:56 AM
8

Except that isn't what this will be, this will be "affirmative consent training" where anything but a spoken and enthusiastic yes is considered no. And how many women get that sort of "consent training". In fact how of ten do women get ANY consent training?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:40 AM
2

Yes; that's on purpose. Feminists want a war between men and women. Mostly they make women hate men, but making men hate women also works for them. Some yes, but for most it's about control, by making women angry/afraid at/of men they can use that to force through laws that "empower women", giving them, and specifically feminists, more power in society.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:11 AM
6

They are being "over taken" with transwomen.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:15 PM
222

No, no, no, just men with the WRONG emotions, men who admit their guilt and accept their roles as "allies" are fine /s.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 12:50 AM
2

OK. It's established in the Avengers that if he tried to kill himself he Hulked out, the Hulk responds to injury to save him, as you pointed out. But there is no evidence that he did, in an accident, no ripped cloths, so why didn't he? The reason is that in the modern narrative a female character can not need to be rescued, so the original origin, Brice gives Jen a blood transfusion to save her CAN'T BE USED. Instead we have the modern narrative, Jen rescues Bruce, gets his blood in an open woun…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:13 AM
1

In the Avengers movie he said "I tried to shoot myself I put a bullet inmy mouth and the other guy spit it out." That implies he can't beknocked unconscious, not really. Right the OTHER GUY came out that's the Hulk, so why is he wearing a shirt? Why is that arm support still on? He didn't Hulk out because that doesn't fit with the narrative that HE NEEDS TO BE SAVED. Otherwise crash, Hulk out, he's fine, no blood. Now they COULD have had a car wreck, she's dying and he CHOOSES to give her a tran…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:44 AM
1

Because it's pretty hard to drag someone out of a car with one hand? I mean if he was conscious he could just Hulk out and EASILY rescue her, so why is he human? Also look at the pose, it's classic for some one who has dragged someone from a vehicle, her behind him, why would they look like that if he rescued her?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:16 PM
1

Even though he's barely conscious and his arms in a sling? And lets face it it would be par for the course.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:36 PM
2

https://movieweb.com/she-hulk-clips-reveal-how-jennifer-gets-her-powers-major-change-for-abomination/ "will become She-Hulk after some of her cousin Bruce Banner’s blood is accidentally transmitted to her following a car accident. " It shows her pulling (has just pulled) Bruce out
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:25 PM
5

It's in a short "Origins of She Hulk" or something, they're in a car crash, Bruce is human (and doesn't convert to Hulk when injured for plot reasons) Jen pulls him out.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:15 PM
5

Except they are changing her origin, can't have a woman saved by a man, no SHE save Bruce, and "accidentally" get his blood in her.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:11 PM
11

As opposed to extreme BDSM or "nut cracking"?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:54 PM
2

It's not about the laws, it's about how they are applied, you can have "gender neutral laws" but if they aren't applied that way....
/r/MensRights25/07/22 08:56 AM
4

The actual Title IX? No. The same effect? Yup definitely.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 06:45 AM
82

Remember they are largely educated in a system that teaches feminist theory, men CANNOT be the subject of oppression or bigotry under this theory.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:21 AM
1

Heh. Well that;s kind of why I want critical thinking taught in schools, as well as statistical literacy.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:36 PM
1

An ideologue is someone who follows a belief set to the exclusion of reality. for whom adherence to that set of beliefs id more important than truth, than reality.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:12 PM
2

Now, now be fair, most ideologues aren't pro truth.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:05 AM
8

Don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:00 AM
6

"Women can be just as good providers as fathers" But we expect men to pay for their children, or even children that aren't theirs if we can.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:10 PM
5

r/twoxchromosomes seems like a fine sub. What? Half the posts are "Pity me I'm a victim" and the other half are "Men are trash/scary/evil", with a VERY few others.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 07:16 PM
1

For those down voting, this is ENTIRELY CORRECT, they don't care about jobs women don't want.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:54 AM
1

Sure and so does toxic femininity so I can call out women?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:42 AM
276

And women don't know what it's like to be a man, so their views on "toxic masculinity" are totally irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:52 AM
12

Then 2x is misandrist, but good luck convincing them.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:36 PM
5

That's the point, you can't, it's simply a way to punish "the wrong men".
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:10 AM
37

The problem is they are doubling down, asking a woman on a date if she doesn't want it is sexual assault in Australia, staring is sexual harassment in the UK etc
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:16 AM
9

Easy they aren't white, that's pretty much it.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:51 AM
5

Humble brag, more or less.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:34 AM
8

Right men being made homeless by divorce, patriarchy, men's health issues ignored, patriarchy, more men dying in jobs, patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:33 AM
8

And which group has laws passed to favor them?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:00 AM
7

The fact you believe men are an "oppressor class" speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:59 AM
11

>Men to conform to society's standard of what Masculinity should/shouldn't be What FEMINISM defines masculinity to be acceptable.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:13 AM
2

If it's like Spain, where the Judges get "special training" or the one they want to set up in NZ where the accuser can't be cross examined not so much.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:32 PM
3

Take a look at the Hugo or Nebula awards , there are pretty much no "straight white males" on them.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:13 PM
9

That's about right, depends on the country, but that's within the margin of error and, at least according to our treasury, it's difficult to account for negotiated pay rises, commission and bonuses, and it's far less that the oft quoted numbers, which is ~17% here.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:50 PM
8

Often the same problem, it doesn't matter if it's "government funded" if the people doing the work are biased and looking to reinforce their narrative not the truth. Look at the "wage gap" it's a multivariate problem they "analyzed" with a crude univariate analysis, and it's bee debunked numerous times, but the correct answer is not the most quoted.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:38 PM
11

This is equivalent to a self selecting survey, a common problem in the social sciences, where you "ask for volunteers" from an "affected community" so you get a rate disproportionate to the general population.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:23 PM
7

There's a lot of "look at me. look at me, look at me" and "..... and then everybody clapped" stories that get way to much attention.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:19 PM
23

Yes but no. Yes they want to "force equality of outcomes" but only for women, there is no push to improve male outcomes.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:55 AM
2

I know that they tried to set up a brothel for women an NZ and it failed, I'm pretty sure the majority of users of prostitutes are men.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:30 AM
3

And how many women use prostitutes? They don't. It's not gendered in language but in action.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:21 PM
1

Remember it's a religion without a god, it's basically heresy to not believe AH.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:10 AM
24

Remember the term has lost it's meaning, it now means "male who says things we don't like".
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:11 PM
1

Pretty much nothing "makes up for" being male, especially white male. Poor? Irrelevant, you're not oppressed.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 07:52 PM
1

If your a WOMAN and gay etc then this trumps in INTERSECTIONAL feminism yes.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 07:51 PM
0

It's TECHNICALLY a hierarchy but being male (and white) trumps basically anything in terms of privilege.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 03:59 AM
1

Possibly, but this data is mostly from prior to agriculture so "warfare" was pretty small scale, also look at it this way from a human population basis the survivors are demonstrating genetic advantage.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:43 AM
3

That would be statistically unlikely, the more children you have the more that would likely survive, ergo if only a certain set of Y-chromosomes are passed on the men carrying them are the decedents of the men who had the same one. So the number of children that survived are likely proportional to the number of children that they had. Especially when you are talking about a population basis, moreover you would expect to see the same pattern in women if child survival rate was the determining fac…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:37 AM
3

Nope, it was based on the Y and X chromosomal linage, basically the evidence is that ~40% of males passed on their Y chromosome, but over ~80% of females passed on their X chromosomes. But it's worse than that, because of those 40% it was not evenly spread.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:45 PM
8

The modern "patriarchy" is basically "the devil", they need someone/something to blame, otherwise they have to accept responsibility.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 02:18 AM
1

I literally quoted the article: "This procedure involves a double mastectomy with downsizing and regrafting of the nipple areola complex or a minimally invasive procedure that spares the nipple.3" Then gave a definition of mastectomy, the total removal of breast tissue. I understand that this goes against your beliefs but that are surgically removing the breasts of 13 year olds, you are either a troll or willfully ignorant, good day.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:41 AM
1

"This procedure involves a double mastectomy with downsizing and regrafting of the nipple areola complex or a minimally invasive procedure that spares the nipple.3" "Mastectomy is considered a major surgery for the below reasons: The procedure involves permanent removal of either one or both breasts, which itself is a major risk factor. Usually, the procedure may last up to 4 hours depending on the severity of the disease. It is performed under general anesthesia" Maybe learn to read. They have …
/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:32 PM
1

"at a US clinic was based on a survey which included 2 girls (transmale) who were 13 years old and had both breasts removed and 5 who were only 14." Both breasts REMOVED, not reduced.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:20 PM
1

And? They cut the tits off 13 year olds, it's absolutely irreversible, just becasue the parents, likely wokists, went along with it doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:11 PM
0

So how about a double mastectomy? https://bioedge.org/uncategorized/13-year-olds-given-mastectomies-at-california-clinic/
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:43 AM
5

It's "unpaid emotional labor" I wish I was kidding but some are advocating that the government should pay women to look after their own children.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:47 AM
2

Or the harassment was from "minorities".
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:59 PM
3

The ones who died were serious.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:59 PM
1

It's not even real attempts, taking a bunch of pills and ring your ex is not "trying".
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:57 PM
13

No we are looking at the COURT RULING.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:44 AM
14

Not according to feminists, or in Spain.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:44 AM
2

More that the women making these posts won't have sex with their husbands.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:44 AM
5

I mean they wont have sex with their husbands but....
/r/MensRights09/05/22 01:18 AM
1

It's more along the lines of the "unpaid labor" argument, pregnancy and child rearing are "labor" so they should be paid for their own pregnancy and child rearing.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:52 AM
9

It's part of white erasure, "Europeans have no culture so it's OK to erase it".
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:31 AM
37

>People thinking the patriarchy is not only real Not only that but the definition is slipping, now it's that "positions of power are held by men" not that there is any benefit to most men.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:07 PM
4

They are trying to tie them together, thus opening the way to "ban masculinity" for "public safety", while ignoring any actual underpinning issues, like bullying.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:52 AM
19

Hahahhah, no. The entire field of the social sciences is hopelessly woke and feminist, EVERYTHING is based on feminist theory.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:42 AM
8

There are none, it's entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:16 AM
12

Or, maybe, SOME women are so sensitive that any man looking at them is "intrusive", look up the term "cry bully".
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:15 AM
1

Well it is in reality, but remember males are not a protected class, so they cannot be the targets of sexism by their definitions.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:00 AM
1

Again, if the WROTE it gender neutral, but NEVER INTENDED IT TO BE then how it's written is irrelevant, they are making plan's to change the matrimonial property act in my country, the new laws are "gender neutral" but are based on who earns less, and who stays home with the kids, so it will benefit women far more than men. We see this regularly, in France a law that was "gender neutral" when it came to "producing equality in councils" was scraped as soon as men tried to use it, same in Sweden w…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:10 PM
4

Because men are not a "protected class" so by Reddit's definition it's not hate speech, or twitter's.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:01 PM
2

They may do but that's ridiculous, the phrase "women and girls" is in no way gender neutral.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:49 PM
1

But that's the point the law may be written gender neutral, it will not be enforced that way.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:48 PM
2

Again it doesn't matter how it's WRITTEN, it matters how it's ENFORCED.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:11 AM
0

Were the quotes unclear? It's sarcastic.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:11 AM
5

It's not JUST money it's also status, and women with an academic background rate academic achievement very highly.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:42 AM
10

https://www.wionews.com/world/staring-at-women-for-long-can-land-you-in-jail-warns-uk-police-471822 https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/17956012/staring-women-sexual-harassment/ https://nz.news.yahoo.com/sexual-harassment-campaign-night-tube-staring-sexually-151556727.html https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/staring-on-tube-unhealthy-sexual-behaviour/ Note the "women and girls" which is apparently "gender neutral".
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:48 PM
11

it’s a gender neutral ‘policy’ Like many "neutral" policies it's only neutral on paper, it is NEVER applied neutrally, hell look at the advertising.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:09 PM
13

Structural power, in a country where ON LY males can be accused of rape? Where boys are failing in school? Where STARING at women has been made a crime?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:38 PM
7

Because they define ANY negative comment about women, regardless if it's true, as misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:37 PM
2

But hey still did it, the apology was just because they got caught.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:36 PM
12

These aren't, they are looking for a soft option.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:24 AM
30

TBF they shouldn't take these "refugees" either.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:24 AM
1

Thank you, it's rare for people to be able to admit an error on here.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 08:29 PM
1

Depends what you mean by "why" women can lie about contraception, or even if a guy is the father, and laws will back them up, I think we maybe talking at cross purposes, I don't think women SHOULD be able to control whether or not a man becomes a father, I'm saying that they believe they have the right to do so, and that the courts will often back them up.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 08:01 PM
3

Look at circumcision, it's mostly done at the request of the mother, if there is a medical decision to make, they usually ask the mother, that's what I mean.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:19 AM
10

Their definition of gender is based on female needs/wants, that's why it's "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:09 AM
11

But it's creating a culture where acing in those ways could be considered harassment.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:37 AM
19

They can't, they have been indoctrinated to believe that they should have total control over the child, but a man should pay for THEIR decisions.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:55 PM
2

It's that they DON'T CARE, they have been indoctrinated to believe it's OK, it's not sexist, it's fine to not hire men.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:56 AM
4

TBF she's probably a freak.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 08:05 PM
0

The mental equipment to play at the top level, which is pretty close to savantism, is more common in men than women, at the tippy top of the pyramid it's basically all men.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:40 PM
23

This is typical progressive policy, here they are putting through "hate speech" laws where being "offensive" to ANYONE but straight white males could be a hate crime.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:11 PM
32

They simply wouldn't consider it truthful, "men can't be raped".
/r/MensRights02/04/22 07:13 PM
48

It's virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:11 AM
29

Remember this is a WOMAN their perspective is that of a woman, with ALLLLL of the "avoid responsibility/blame men".
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:10 AM
5

No. It's double speak, They use language that EXPLICITLY IGNORES MALES, and then say that it includes them, but every statement will be "women and girls".
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:40 PM
3

Most of the service jobs are dominated by women becasue the clients want them done by women, massage, hairdressing, dental hygienists etc.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:16 PM
16

I hope your right, but they are reacting to the typical track record, look at the guy that tried to set up a shelter for battered men in the US, or the protests at talks on men's issues.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 07:43 PM
39

"Act in a way that feminism says is acceptable" see also "toxic masculinity" and "internalized misogyny".
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:06 AM
17

Wouldn't it be more effective to use women? I mean people might actually care.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:02 AM
7

Ha, ha ,ha oh I hope you're not serious, they are currently working on changing the health system for "equity" and bringing in "three waters" as a "power sharing" agreement, plus their "hate speech" laws that will criminalize misgendering etc.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:41 PM
3

Sure but it plays into basic hypergamy, women get to share a "winner", often while cheating on him.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:16 AM
5

Nope. This is classic resource based allocation of matting rights, the rich and powerful have sex/kids, and more for the richer.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:46 PM
31

Yup, classic Ad Hom, if you can't attack the point attack the person.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:44 PM
2

No one will take it seriously, it's "promotional".
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:05 PM
18

Nah it's part and parcel of the UK now, man bad women victims, same in Australia as well.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 06:22 AM
10

Not ignorance, deliberate "reinterpretation", cherry picking and distortion, to "prove" their ideological position is "truth".
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:30 PM
7

Not exactly, she is so ideologically biased she simply doesn't see men as victims.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:28 PM
49

More than that "It isn't sexism because sexism requires power and privilege" literately redefining a word to ensure it only applies to women THEN denying that women have "power and privilege".
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:41 PM
1

That's great I'm glad it works for you, but many times it doesn't work well for men because the feminist narrative pervades the therapy. But if it works for you good luck and have a nice day.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:29 PM
1

Even if nothing IN the therapy is gender related, the bias of the therapist maybe, in that the perspective can be biased, or you got lucky. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-11995-045 https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342314.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195342314-e-016
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:13 PM
1

You think females will be better when there is feminist indoctrination?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:54 PM
2

I don't think "medicine" is the correct term for therapy, and in any case the "social sciences" are massively "woke" and "feminist theory" infested, that includes all psychology, therapy and social work degrees. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/sep/14/gender-studies-male-blaming-bias
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:41 PM
1

No. I mean what they accept as men's mental health issues, in a way they accept as treatment, based on the feminist principles they are indoctrinated in, keep up.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:35 PM
0

And if she gets pregnant and THEN pulls this, he's on the hook for child support, possibly more depending on local laws.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:00 AM
6

And then what? He has no power to control her decision.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 10:40 PM
10

What THEY accept as "men mental health"
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:03 PM
3

Women prefer different men at different times for different things, women on hormonal birth control prefer men with more rounded (babyish) features, women who are ovulating prefer men with more masculine features, women like boyish/androgynous guys as pop stars (nonthreatening pretty boys) when they are younger, but prefer masculine guys for sex.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:58 PM
0

TBF that assumes that dating apps represent the "real" world, although to my knowledge a very similar pattern happens in colleges.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:51 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mating_strategies#Double_standards_and_infidelity The wiki actually has some useful information, including the varying mating strategies used by females due to age.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:50 PM
1

No,no,no see they are HELPING men by REDEFINING masculinity into something acceptable to feminists, therefore kingmaker men BETTER /s
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:50 AM
3

That is one of the mysteries of the universe :)
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:49 AM
4

That would be hard.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:28 AM
3

https://www.iwf.org/2019/07/23/two-truths-and-a-lie-the-pink-tax/ https://fee.org/articles/is-there-really-a-pink-tax/ Basically the products are often not the same, for example men's shirts can be dry cleaned on a standard dummy, women's cannot, OR they are very similar but women are willing to pay more for the difference in perceived value, see shoes.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:24 AM
3

Because it's racism /s Basically if whites gain ANYTHING it's racism, achieve anything, racism.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:43 AM
2

No,no,no they are saying that men being offended is a sign of weakness, just accept what we tell you and everything will be fine, complain when we call all of you potential rapists and you show that you are mentally weak /s
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:22 AM
8

Likely not, a lot of white knights pop in to harass.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:35 AM
16

Because "women and girls" has emotional impact, and feminism has been pushing the message of "women are the primary victims of...." for decades.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:48 AM
14

inadvertently invalidate male victims. Nothing inadvertent about it, it's by design.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:47 AM
10

If troops are sent over expect a massive wave of "accidental" pregnancies.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:26 AM
32

They don't, they read it. and re-translate it into whatever fits their ideological world view, it's like the religious "praising God for a miracle" when someone is saved by modern medicine.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 11:45 PM
3

Because these ideas are being indoctrinated into many levels of society, it's feminists now, it'll be everyone going through university in 10 years.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 07:16 PM
13

Because ROGD doesn't seem to happen to boys, it's a "social contagion" it's about attention and acceptance, propagated by "love bombing" activists, the (rough) equivalent for boys would be "non-binary" which gives much of the attention without requiring any real actions.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:42 AM
1

Probably not.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:05 PM
0

Explain?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:04 PM
3

Bullshit. There is evidence of women making up shit just becasue a guy pisses them off, no one know how many accusation are false, but the best estimates is 8-10% are PROVABLY false.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:03 PM
8

Really? It's typical, "We want equal rights, but not any responsibility or risk".
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:07 AM
1

The 1st is a trap, the second makes no sense ;)
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:06 AM
2

The lack of a picture makes that difficult to ascertain, next.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:02 AM
5

Yes. Next question?
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:53 PM
4

As I recall they didn't break the numbers down by sex.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 06:15 PM
4

Bullshit. There are numerous "affirmative action" programs to increase numbers of women in "under represented subjects"none for men.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 07:24 PM
7

You're forgetting one of the fundamental dichotomies of the modern feminist movement, they believe that women should have access to the top men, but ALL OTHER MEN ARE INVISIBLE, or actively "creepy" so an "incel" is basically unclean, they want them to stay in their lane.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 06:31 PM
4

You would be surprised.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 06:09 PM
6

Nope. They will simply not do the work, but have positions. It already happens, you have quotas for females in management, so they create superfluous positions to make up the numbers.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:03 PM
9

It is ignoring the problem, diminishing it, try asking "What do I do if my husband yells at me?" see the difference in answer.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:12 PM
1

There are risks, there always are, but the risks of severe complications and even death from the virus is significantly greater.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:06 AM
1

The vaccine hasn't lost 100% efficacy, it still reduces the chance of hospitalization markedly, we often vaccinate against things that aren't even that dangerous, just to avoid any complications, such as rotavirus. So even if all it does is cut the rate of hospital admissions it's worthwhile.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:25 AM
1

I can't argue with the long term efficacy of the vaccines, but TBF that's mostly due to the rapid mutation of the virus, it's a bit like flu we'll end up with getting a variant booster every year.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 01:31 AM
4

It's a vaccine, we have over a century of evidence on the efficacy of vaccines, they stopped Smallpox one of the worlds great scourges, they prevent millions of deaths every year.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 08:22 PM
1

if it's legal record EVERYTHING, keep copies of all communications, then lay a complaint on the basis of hate speech.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 07:59 AM
1

Good to know.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:12 PM
1

>yes if he’s fucking molesting him on a bus He or she as the molester? Checking to see if you are looking at it from a gender neutral perspective.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:08 PM
3

Legally restricted, and yes it is thrown about a lot, but legally only a woman can be raped, and only by a man, to the point that they are trying to redefine it to exclude transwomen as perpetrators. To your 1st point yes and no, theoretically a woman charged with sexual assault for grabbing a guys ass could have an increased perception of severity, but that just doesn't happen. Look at the cases of female teachers "sleeping with" students, it's generally not even called sexual assault.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:46 AM
17

More than that is it legal for a veterinarian to do this?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:22 AM
5

Right so a woman grabbing a guys junk should go into jail for at least 2 years?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:21 AM
1

>We can only go by what the article says but i have a big issue with the words 'sexual assault' here. Firstly it belittles the true definition of sexual assault and secondly is it sexual assault if it's a minor fetish? If someone had a leather fetish and stroked the arms of people wearing leather jackets; is that sexual assault? To answer the second part first, yes it is sexual assault, which leads to the answer to the 1st part, sexual assault is a very broad term, from something as minor as thi…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:20 AM
6

. What? That ain't even true at all there's less female accountants less female lawyer's Bullshit, here there are MORE female lawyers and accounts, easy money, inside job, flexible working hours, well over half of all new grads are women, approaching 70% in these fields, hell more than half of all new Dr's are women.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:17 AM
11

Well of COURSE you're an INCEL, only an INCEL could consider the VIOLENCE women SUFFER at the hands of MEN to be EQUIVALENT to the harm women cause in SELF DEFENSE /s.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 03:20 AM
127

I'm amazed they didn't come up with a way of blaming the boy,
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:35 PM
11

Nope.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham\_child\_sexual\_exploitation\_scandal
/r/MensRights01/02/22 08:12 AM
1

Not if it was "Nice ass" no.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:26 AM
13

Yes. But that's not the only sort of thing being punished, that's the issue, they have pushed through an entire set of anti hate speech laws that "protect minorities" from "offensive and derogatory language" that is entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:15 AM
17

Nope, they're correct the "grooming gangs" in the UK, overwhelmingly Pakistani men, were ignored for decades, and pretty much still are, due to "fears of being labeled racist".
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:56 AM
30

The problem is what defines "offensive comments" remember the 10hrs in NY video, "Hello beautiful" was regarded as "offensive".
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:55 AM
5

Hell look at Spain special courts, and they are trying to do the same thing in a number of countries.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 07:43 PM
2

It's as much the new attention seeking behavior, blame men, get affirmation that it's "all men fault".
/r/MensRights31/01/22 07:32 PM
1

They already do this with harassment.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:44 PM
9

Invalid? Nope there is evidence to support it as a general rule of thumb: https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0192-x https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v12n03_01?src=recsys https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499509551782?src=recsys https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00926239908404010?src=recsys
/r/MensRights29/01/22 07:24 PM
5

It's social camo, you wear the "uniform" of your social group.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:41 PM
5

Really? And what modern show has strong male characters who aren't mostly evil?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 05:41 PM
5

I'm not here applying it to one specific gender just people acting in a manner that would be discomforting to most people. Except it's almost never applied to women, or unattractive men, it's entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 09:03 AM
1

I also don't know what you mean by "the right of women to have children at the cost of the state." Depends where you live, here a "single mother" gets money from the government till the kid is 5 years, as long as they "don't know who the father is", they will also pay for sperm donations, even IVF, for single women.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 04:17 AM
4

It simply require someone to make a protest about you, doesn't matter why, or even if it's a real protest, or even if you actually broke a rule.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 12:17 AM
24

You mean maybe she's been indoctrinated by a feminist media into believing that ALL her problems are caused by men? I'm shocked, shocked.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:10 AM
1

True as there are limited places, but the choices have less to do with "specialties dominated by their gender" and more to do with what specialties appeal to them for a variety of reasons, often work life/balance.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 07:56 PM
1

Yes but once that get to the point of choosing specialties there will be a significant difference in what specialties will be chosen.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 07:49 PM
29

There are forums, including on reddit, that tell women that it's their right to have children, regardless of what their partner want's, and how to go about it, lying about contraception is the 1st.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 08:45 PM
3

>Punishing guilty rapists after they have been through due process. Theoretically, except that they won't believe that women CAN be rapists, or that a man found innocent is, which leads to.... >Protecting those accused of life-threatening accusations, e.g., rape, murder, and everything that aligns with them. Insert laughing JJ Jameson gif here, they literally call for punishment based on accusations, they truly believe that "less than 2% of rape allegations are false" >Ensuring that children hav…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:09 AM
3

Evidence of rape could be just seminal fluid, which is just evidence of sex really.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 09:16 AM
15

It's worse than that, men are taught that their sexuality is bad/wrong IF IT'S STRAIGHT, they are praised if they are gay/bi/trans (I know the last is not a sexuality but that's how it's presented), at least in the western education system.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:15 PM
96

> It is as if they are trying to rewire mens brain to the point of having no sexual desire at all by shaming them Not ALL men, just the unattractive ones, they still want the hot/rich ones.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:09 PM
1

Yup, all those unwritten rules that everyone else seems to get, but some how where never uploaded to you.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 08:11 AM
1

LOL. Yeah, I mean it was REAL obvious to everyone else, I should probably realized that a girl taking off her pants in my bedroom was a hint, but she gave a "plausible" reason so I assumed she meant it.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 08:07 AM
1

When I was younger I was approached all the time, I had no IDEA I was being approached, but it did happen :)
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:41 AM
8

The SPLC is an attack dog for whomever pays them, follow the money.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:08 AM
9

Yes, also things like episiotomies, which are commonly performed by OBGYN who are more likely to be female, whereas heart surgeries are carried out by cardiac surgeons who are likely to be male.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 05:34 AM
13

Of course can't have any taint of "blame" on women.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 05:15 AM
2

Which kind of cuts to the heart of the matter, "incel" is used as an insult, "Strong independent women" is a self claimed title.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 04:58 AM
2

Depends is it "assigned" or "self proclaimed"?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:02 PM
3

Who gave it that meaning? Oh that's right feminists. Same as MGTOW "It's bad".
/r/MensRights07/01/22 08:03 PM
21

INCEL just mean "involuntary celibate" all the other stuff has been added to it.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:13 AM
3

In my country yes, as it "need not be intentional, nor repeated" and "is based on the perception of the complainant".
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:48 AM
4

Indians do as many arranged marriages, although that might be immigration scams.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:08 AM
25

You mean the "nice old ladies" who shamed men for not volunteering to go off and die in war?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 11:28 PM
4

Or eventually women will abstain from sex entirely Nah. They will just all fuck the same small segment of guys, which is already happening.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:57 PM
0

TBF "staring" would be considered sexual harassment, and fall under the umbrella term "sexual violence", as would sexual assault.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:55 PM
1

True. Not really relevant to high competition like e-sports or chess.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:27 AM
5

Well yes, but the bottom end of the distribution isn't playing world class chess :)
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:26 AM
12

On average yes. At the extremes, and that's where the winners live, men are more likely to have a higher IQ.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:36 AM
6

It's also the level of dedication and ability to take shit, get up, and do it again, women often never learn that, given the level of "help" they typically receive.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:34 AM
1

Men can write books, and have them nominated, maybe, but they are VERY unlikely to win, they would need to have some serious woke credentials, usually at the detriment of the writing.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 10:48 PM
2

Same as "sexual violence" which includes harassment.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:08 PM
2

Yup, when I started seeing obvious woke insert characters, or "stories" that followed a woke check list, "A terrible fall of angels" was an amazing/terrible example of this.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:05 PM
2

Sure. It's only that you wont win.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:02 PM
0

Oh it can, your brain works on stimuli if you are constantly stimulated it takes MORE stimuli to get the same response (habituation).
/r/MensRights21/12/21 06:06 PM
7

Well intersectional feminism so yes.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:59 AM
11

That's the entire point, they can use vague statements based on feelings to demonize and regulate men.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 11:44 PM
2

Also the outcomes for men were ALWAYS WORSE THAN WOMEN'S irregardless of the sex of the surgeon.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:02 PM
4

Also male surgeons tend to do different operations, the more complex and dangerous ones, and as another poster pointed out the average age of the women that male surgeons operated on was over 5 years older.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 05:59 PM
2

It's also specializations, males go into surgery and orthopedics, women into pediatrics and general practice more.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 08:19 PM
0

It's amazing how persuasive a good BJ can be.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:34 AM
0

Technically that IS sexual assault, ridiculous, I know.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 07:59 AM
2

It's not just cat calling it's ANYTHING, including "leering" (looking for an extended period) that makes a woman uncomfortable, expect guys to be arrested for LITERALLY walking down the street.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:00 AM
30

Have you read 2X? There are common "and then everybody clapped" "stories" where women are "terrified" by men being on the same street, in the same parking lot etc
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:54 PM
41

That's the point, in my country sexual harassment need not be repeated, intended or OBJECTIVELY OFFENSIVE, it is dependent on the feelings of the complainant.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:52 PM
3

It's not because they are girls, it's because they are HOT girls, that show a lot of skin, and pretend to care about the boys watching.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:31 PM
8

Same in Australia.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 01:25 AM
4

Ms Pinot said she had been taken to hospital where she received treatment for several injuries, including a broken nose. Then there would be hospital records of that, which the court could obtain.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:56 PM
1

Oh I agree, but the current "regime" doesn't WANT kids to have critical thinking skills, just accept what is said as fact, and if you disagree you're a .....
/r/MensRights29/11/21 11:14 PM
0

True. But how many people KNOW that? The majority of people think that what they get from the majority sources MUST be true, becasue it's on TV right, they can't LIE can they? And the level of denial they have when presented with alternative viewpoints or, shock horror, EVIDENCE that goes against the pap they are feed is astonishing.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:34 PM
1

Sure I mean if your not looking at odd, non curated sites to find alternative points of view it's on you, it's YOUR fault if you swallow the pap that mainstream media feed you. just because you don't know that what you're being fed is bullshit. /s
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:12 PM
19

Then it's not actual evidence of the crime, it was USED as evidence but it didn't prove what they said it did.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:00 PM
18

If he was exonerated there was no physical evidence.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:53 PM
3

Yeah that sort of shit, I mean if she undoes your belt and starts blowing you I think consent can be assumed :)
/r/MensRights27/11/21 10:49 PM
14

It's likely the whole "affirmative consent" thing as in "Oh no we had sex while you were drunk so I'm a rapist".
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:39 PM
1

Given he's likely to be playing second fiddle to one if not two female characters in his OWN MOVIE I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 09:28 AM
1

Religion is ALWAYS used to secure power for the religion and the "state" will take advantage of it, a religion can pull down an Empire, it's why the Roman Empire went Christian. It's used as an excuse for war, it's used by the leaders to gain temporal power and influence, look at the Mormon church where the leader used his status to sleep with his followers wives. Look at he Church of England where the King CREATED a religion so he could divorce his wife and the Church supported it because it ga…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:49 PM
1

Really? Look at Iran, religious police, and it isn't just religions the current "cult" of dogmatic "progressiveness" will happily lie to get someone fired, same thing different dogma.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:13 PM
1

Who gets to say "Do this or you're a sinner" who can set your neighbors on you because you didn't go to prayers, who can get you fired from your job because you said the wrong thing, who is it that gets the churches backing and has "divine right to rule". That's the elite, priests and popes and prophets.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:32 AM
3

Generally? Whoever runs the religion/cult/dogmatic belief system, and the minority they bestow their "blessing" on see the Roman Catholic Church.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:19 AM
7

Yes. Their beliefs are lies created to control people and give power to an elite minority.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:39 PM
10

Remember this is to get "equity" in exchange for the "years of oppression" that "undervalued female labor".,
/r/MensRights21/11/21 08:01 AM
12

It's more "All men are inherently evil, so it's OK that I hate them, it's not that I have a problem THEY are the problem, every issue I have is caused by men:.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:10 AM
15

Would you accept "vocal feminists" because it's the ones we hear, it's the ones getting to write articles in the media.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:32 PM
26

Huge generalization there. -I have literally had a pregnant woman yell at me for holding open a door while she was carrying a large box, they only want help on their terms.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:33 AM
2

Not exactly they want MOST men controlled, tamed, neutered and tied to the plow, they (at least a significant proportion) still want a certain percentage of "wild" men.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:10 AM
3

More that the media, driven by "progressives" define any male that acts in a negative way as an "incel" it's an insult in the same vein as "white nationalist".
/r/MensRights08/11/21 06:04 PM
21

Yup, they grow up with feminist teachers, on feminism saturated social media, and don't forget they think it will get them laid.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 06:02 PM
1

At this point we were tribal, so it was feed the tribe, most men wouldn't even know WHICH kids were theirs (as in which they fathered).
/r/MensRights06/11/21 08:24 PM
10

Hunters are not warriors.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 06:36 PM
2

Most of that (larger numbers of female ascendants) predates agriculture, there was no concept of "wealth", based on female mate preferences we see NOW, and in other species, it's more likely that women simply chose to have sex with (and therefore become pregnant to) a small subset of males.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 06:35 PM
17

Hang on isn't that victim blaming?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:20 AM
1

Hell it's worse than that, there are pushes for QUOTAS for women in high paying safe jobs becasue of "the lack of equality".
/r/MensRights04/11/21 07:35 PM
12

Forced equality? No. Equal opportunity? Fine. As soon as you mandate for quotas to "improve equality" you done fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:55 AM
3

TBF, and I find that hard, but they will NEVER be frontline, they will hire them and assign them to backstage positions.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 10:05 PM
1

Right becasue the CEO gets told about every HR issue, he has lawyers for that.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:27 AM
2

Of course, the choice of language people use is specific to the emotions they want to invoke, victim, perpetrator, rape, relationship etc
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:24 AM
0

I asked for evidence ELON MUSK is racist, not that individuals in his company are.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:19 AM
1

He is a racist piece of shit. ​ Citation required.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:07 AM
2

It's not just ego, they really BELIEVE that it's the case, facts don't matter, that's why I call it the new religion of the left.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 04:51 AM
2

Pretty much Men's Rights=Misogyny for a lot of people, if you ask them "Do men not deserve equal rights?" they really don't seem to understand that men have issues.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 04:50 AM
3

Well when your that far left everyone else is far right :)
/r/MensRights01/11/21 08:06 PM
7

Oh that still exists on the far right, it's just that the fringes have moved farther apart, so you see more left/right of center people, but the discourse is controlled by the loud fringe.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:53 PM
21

Oh 10 years ago I would have been as well, but now the "left" has moved so far into the fringe loony territory that they left me behind, it went from "We want equality" to "We will re-write history and lie to push a narrative that allows us to take power while claiming victim status".
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:45 PM
19

No problem for THEM :) They won't be accused of assault, women won't want to risk the chance they won't get it from them again, they will bitch and moan, but they would still hop into bed with him.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:42 PM
24

Of course not, what you read is usually heavily biased by the progressive left.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:38 PM
29

It's sort of that and sort of a self reinforcing cycle, if a guy is hot he gets women easily, they will approach him, he can shag them and leave, not problem, this reinforces his belief that he's "special" that gives him the confidence to just say "Wanna fuck?" and if they aren't interested onto the next.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:37 PM
6

They fully understand male vulnerability, and exploit it.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:02 AM
1

Right so some scumbags in the UK got hold of an unknown injectable drug that rendered it's victims insensible for hours?
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:43 AM
2

The Hugos, Kim S Robinson's 2312 springs to mind it was a BAD book, poorly written, badly paced, the ending was rushed and the entire last half dragged, it won, not becasue it was good, but in large part becasue every one who was anyone in it was a fully functional hermaphrodite, and lamented the fact that the teeming masses of Earth weren't.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:41 AM
301

This is seen strongly in the awards, they are no longer given out to good, or popular, books, instead it's based on the politics and "representation".
/r/MensRights26/10/21 09:20 AM
1

Well based on the effects of the drug, that narrows it down doesn't it? How many inject able drugs would cause symptom X?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 07:40 AM
2

The testing in laboratories can detect very small traces, even metabolites, and we are talking about large enough doses to render people senseless for hours at a time. I'd expect SOMETHING even if just evidence that some drug was injected. In terms of altered enzyme levels, something. They can detect traces of opioids in hair 30 days after you take them, there would have to be some trace the following day.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 09:56 AM
3

No but there have been no reports QUOTING medical reports, none saying "There were detectable levels of x,y,z found in blood tests" just women SAID they were injected. It's the same with drink spiking, the vast majority of tests only ever detected alcohol, but the tests WERE carried out.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:42 AM
0

Citation required.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:38 AM
3

I have seen no medical reports, if they are injected with something it will be detectable.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:33 AM
1

I've also seen no reports of the medical reports, if they were injected with a drug it would be detectable.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:33 AM
5

Most of the test just reveals alcohol, I suppose they could be being slipped trebles instead of singles.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:07 AM
3

>I personally think therapy caters to women It's actually worse than that, the VAST majority of "therapists" are progressive, even far left, feminists, they operate under a massive bias.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 11:30 PM
23

It's more that they live in a bubble where all "heteronormative cis-men" are EVIL, they truly believe that they are just WAITING for an opportunity to kill/rape/torture women and LGBTQI etc
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:25 PM
3

It's changed to "equity" now, "Oh THESE jobs are under-payed relative to THESE, "similar jobs".
/r/MensRights20/10/21 08:30 AM
1

There is evidence that she colluded with her boyfriend, and was trying to extort money from some that were arrested, there are, unsubstantiated, rumors that it was a set up, a sting for publicity and financial gain. The collusion with her boyfriend and the extortion, for which there is evidence, is suggestive but only circumstantial.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:23 AM
1

The incident is on tape, but not the background, THAT is in the paper.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:59 PM
11

It's not ignorance, incels are male, not an "oppressed minority" so it's fine to hate them, thus they create an enemy to focus public outrage on.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 09:28 PM
9

Easy, any man who doesn't "support women" is an Incel, if incels are terrorists all men who don't think the way we want are terrorists.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 09:26 PM
18

It's a massive double standard, and if the woman in question decided to press charges for "harassment" the prof is fucked.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:03 PM
2

Some sure that's why I said "almost all".
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:50 PM
2

Fair enough, but it's also the group with the highest IQ's, but at that level they tend to have their own problems.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:50 PM
16

We already have, they just use the state, look at the Duluth model.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:58 PM
33

That's what happens when you live in a bubble of radical feminist propaganda "97% of women are sexually harassed" "1in4 women are sexually assaulted".
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:58 PM
13

Nah at this level of paranoia it's mental illness, exacerbated by feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:54 PM
6

True. But while the average intelligence of males and females is basically the same the extremes are not as evenly distributed, the most intelligent (and least) are almost all men. https://www.wonderslist.com/10-most-intelligent-people/
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:51 PM
8

https://us.humankinetics.com/blogs/excerpt/reasons-for-gender-differences-in-youth-sport >The answer lies in how girls and boys in our culture learn about and internalize gendered beliefs, values, and practices. This is called socialization, a process in which we actively formulate ideas about who we are and how we're supposed to act (and not act). Males and females are socialized very differently in most cultures. As a result of this socialization, stereotypes are often formed. A stereotype is …
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:46 PM
1

Trust? No. But a major Indian news paper is stating that she and her boyfriend cooked up the scheme and planning to extort some of the men, I'll trust that over a random redditor but you do you.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 04:51 PM
1

No reason to trust it either.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:59 AM
1

Not sure, the articles just say in a "provocative manner" whatever that means in this context, and no they shouldn't have but we don't know how many of the guys were acting in cahoots with her for publicity, which seems to be the point of this, again according to an article from India.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:41 AM
4

Yup woman commits a crime, find a man to blame.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 03:25 AM
1

No. That's the accomplices part, I will agree that a certain mob mentality will take over after a point, look at the various riots in the US last year, but it looks very much from what I've read as a set up. As in they went to an area of "very traditional men" (read religious) and she acted in a way to incite the crowd, then certain individuals "attacked" her. Now are all the men who attacked her accomplices? No probably not. But it would be like going to a BLM rally as a white guy, wearing a "B…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 12:06 AM
1

Go to an area where there are many men, have a few accomplices that start the trouble, happens in riots as well.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 07:09 PM
2

Gee since she planned to extort money from them maybe it's hard to trust that the whole thing wasn't a setup, I mean how did it all happen, why were they all there?
/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:16 PM
155

Believe all women /s
/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:06 PM
3

Not that they are GETTING the jobs men are being forced out by quotas, but there are NO reciprocal quotas in female dominated areas, and in fact when "gender neutral laws" have been used by men they are swiftly removed.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:58 PM
22

I suspect they meant a "hate" crime, I think that's been reported elsewhere.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:49 AM
4

I can't say I've ever read one, although I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:21 AM
16

TBF the main argument seemed to be that it was art as opposed to the sex of the "victim".
/r/MensRights09/10/21 08:02 PM
8

TBF it's likely that men are more likely to rock the boat.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:53 AM
0

Men have larger torsos with wider shoulders and more mass in the upper body, a higher center of mass, tend to be taller and don't have boobs.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 02:22 AM
1

That's the supposition, I'd say it's likely true, given the differences in proportions, weight distribution etc
/r/MensRights08/10/21 02:03 AM
14

From the article: “Seatbelts are sexist” . Well the dummies they were tested on are more or less "male shaped" because the researchers didn't want people to "empathize with them", also more men are involved in car accidents, thus they do not perform as well for women as men.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 10:44 PM
15

Remember twox bans anyone that doesn't go along with their group think, same for a lot of other subs, so they end up as echo chambers. Whats more people post bullshit in an effort to get attention, half the stuff I read there comes of as "...and then everybody clapped".
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:11 AM
14

>To my knowledge, there are no male therapists, which isn't a problem, it's just not an appealing career for men generally speaking, but it's worth mentioning. The worst part is how the room is laid out. Bright colours of pink, weird fluffy pillows and eccentric lighting. It looks like a teenage girls bedroom, and it's absolutely an environment only specially curated to making women feel more comfortable. ​ Oh it's worse than that, social work (which this falls under) is absolutely DOMINATED by …
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:28 PM
3

Now you're moving the goal posts: >The State is a gynocentric/misandry filled discriminatory hellhole for men. There was even a cult like extremist female oriented group on that country that (somehow (!)) found their way onto the state politics That is not saying that society is controlled by women, only that it prioritizes their happiness and welfare above men, and that a radical feminist group got some political power.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:34 AM
9

That's a classic apex fallacy, just because the majority of the .00001% are men it doesn't mean that men have it good.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 05:04 PM
6

It's not just Australia, it's the entire West, the SYSTEM, uses the "women are victims, men are perpetrators" as it's foundation, EVERYTHING is based on this, if they want the money they accept the dogma.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 07:52 AM
12

True. BUT, look at the PRAISE and support it gets.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:08 PM
6

Well yes, in a number of countries they are changing the law, or at least how trials are conducted, to avoid "re-traumatizing the victim" by preventing cross examination, or giving evidence by per-recorded video, see also "affirmative consent".
/r/MensRights27/09/21 01:19 AM
41

It's not whether it's true or not, it's whether it fits the narrative.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 11:03 AM
3

TBF, "X" could make a killer logo.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:37 AM
4

Woke people make it seem like white people will only get to their position because of their skin colour and promote the idea that people belonging in minorities get there by hard work. Oh it's worse than that, meritocracies are now being called "white supremacist".
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:19 AM
17

There are more single women who want to find a guy but can’t. They can't find a guy up to THEIR standards, which are artificially high.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:02 AM
7

https://time.com/2934500/1-in-5%e2%80%82campus-sexual-assault-statistic/ Biased self reporting survey in a specific institution with a biased evaluation of the results through a "feminist lens" and then expanded to the general population.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:53 AM
16

>It makes me feel ashamed to be a man sometimes, until I remember that it's not MEN who are causing this problem, but r*pists and murderers. It's not even them, it's FEMINISTS, they're the ones pushing the idea that every guy is just WAITING to rape and murder women, false statistics, biased studies etc
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:43 AM
4

By defining it in such a way it removes men, from the consciousness, as victims.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 11:11 PM
12

Remember that they have redefined it to "anything that offends women/anything that doesn't support women/anything that supports men".
/r/MensRights22/09/21 11:09 PM
12

Or NZ, hell live "in the nature of a marriage" for 3 years.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:30 AM
19

>Being gentle! The most important one. There’s a reason why women prefer gentlemen. Except the women who REALLY like it rough, they exist.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:00 AM
7

Sexual assault often covers offenses like flashing, not really violence, same with stalking, it may lead to violence, but is not violence, whereas men are FAR more likley to be the victims of a violent assault.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:17 AM
13

Good to know, but in both cases courts have ruled in favor of the mother getting child support.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:38 AM
5

What about when a woman forges his signature to access his sperm, or steals it from a condom and artificially inseminates herself?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:32 AM
17

And if she rapes him? How about if she forges his signature to steal his sperm?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:31 AM
7

So does denying it to force a person to comply, walking away from a person who does so is the only sensible option, that sort of mentality usually leads to other forms of coercive control, bullying etc.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:13 AM
13

Fair call, how about "If that's you position goodbye"?
/r/MensRights14/09/21 08:39 PM
8

Its bizarre, they are terrified of walking down the street with a man ANYWHERE near them, but will happily fuck some guy they met on Tindr.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 08:38 PM
3

Remember from the perspective of the woke left a boy pinching a woman's butt is as bad as rape, they think that this means he WILL rape,
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:38 PM
7

Why? They are career politicians, they are really, really good at being politicians, not anything else.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:33 PM
50

Are you taking the piss? If anyone gets caught doing FGM in a Western country they are up in front of a court.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 04:25 AM
9

Can't the courts have ruled that "bias to correct historical under representation" is legal, which translates to "discrimination against straight white men is fine".
/r/MensRights09/09/21 08:56 PM
10

Prevent? No. Disincentivize? Yes.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:58 AM
15

Nothing, but absolutely nothing prevents a man from doggedly pursuing a college education. Other than the massively woke system that will criminalize a man on the basis of an accusation? Or the ones with quotas to ensure "equality" but only to increase women's participation, even removing equality law if it starts to "harm" women?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:57 AM
15

That's pretty much any woke position.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:36 AM
14

Of course it's legal, it's diverse /s
/r/MensRights05/09/21 05:22 AM
1

Not the point, the point is how THEY value men, THEIR definition of "high value", you know the ones they can't find.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 05:20 AM
1

Beautiful has implications of femininity, handsome would be the male equivalent.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:09 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:06 PM
4

Unless they want money of course.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:43 AM
7

Ask the women who say "Where have all the good men gone?"
/r/MensRights04/09/21 01:02 AM
3

I've seen that question posited, and no feminists don't want that because "men could claim child support" or "the child would be a reminder".
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:57 AM
2

That has never been the case, it never ends up working the other way, "inclusion and diversity" means "fewer men".
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:37 PM
6

Where they won't be hired due to "inclusion and diversity quotas".
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:19 AM
1

Also look at "sexual violence" this sounds worse than sexual assault right? But it's actually a combination of sexual assault AND sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:49 AM
2

Classic Apex fallacy, simply reply (if not blocked) with "75% of all homeless are men, and there are far more of them".
/r/MensRights21/08/21 05:19 AM
6

They ask people and then infer to the whole population, very unreliable.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:27 PM
25

Avoid them like the plague, maybe get a bouncer or someone involved but don't be alone with them EVER.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:16 AM
14

>MGTOW makes a consistent efforts to push away incels and is against incel culture. That is buying into the feminist narrative that "incels are basment dwelling woman haters" whereas most are just lonely frustrated guys.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:19 AM
5

It's a retort to any male pushing a non-acceptable view, "You're upset about X, fragile masculinity" basically a shaming tactic.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:14 AM
2

Such as Sweden.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:02 AM
2

It's based on definitions, by defining "traditional relationships" as "possession".
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:00 PM
10

Of course, women are an "oppressed minority", the UN doesn't care about men.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:58 PM
5

Yup. When they delete comments that say "maybe screaming "Fuck off" to a guy who said "Hi, hello" is rude" yeah, I mean asking for "support" because a guy spoke to you.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:20 PM
32

Remember "rape" has been re-defined as "any sex you wouldn't have had given what you know now".
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:17 PM
10

https://reason.com/2019/10/11/manchester-teen-griffiths-sex-offender-friend/
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:59 AM
3

Except that modern feminism is driving the behavior "you can have it all", "you deserve it", and of course "you can fuck anyone you want to it doesn't matter if you sleep with 3 guys over a weekend".
/r/MensRights29/07/21 02:36 AM
3

They already have, and they are not "going without", they just aren't "seriously dating" the women still fuck around, the guys not so much.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 02:34 AM
12

But that would frighten off real victims /s.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 02:30 AM
36

It's like sexist, or racist, they spew it when a religious group would say "heretic" or "blasphemer".
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:40 AM
1

Sure. If that's so why is the "pay gap" STILL a thing? Why is "equity" the new "equality"? Why the push to "value" female dominated, non-productive, work the same as male dominated, more competitive, more productive work?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 02:33 AM
2

They are told that ANY issues in their lives are the fault of men directly, or the patriarchy, don't get paid as much as a barista as the plumber, patriarchy, your degree in gender studies can't get you a high paying corporate job, patriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:51 AM
12

It's typical gynocentrism, woman can't be blamed, for anything, including their own choices and actions.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:48 AM
8

TBF a lot of this could be that progressive women are both more likely to lay false claims AND want to fuck black guys.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:54 PM
7

Good luck convincing a politician of any of it, they have feminist "focus groups" and any attempt to show male issues is of course "misogyny".
/r/MensRights22/07/21 07:23 AM
2

And what does underage mean? Here it under 16, in some countries it's 14.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:15 PM
5

True, but if it "looks too good to be true" or in this case so archetypal it defies rational skepticism.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:08 AM
3

No because of the progressive stack, victimhood is considered to be "good" because it means more attention and resources, so women are still an "oppressed minority" and women must be doing worse then men.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:02 PM
2

Remember women are a protected group. men aren't.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:12 PM
31

Or "You are inherently bad due to your race/sex/sexual orientation"
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:40 AM
1

Bull, it may be illegal but no woman will ever be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:49 PM
1

Remember Men's Rights is an alt-right hate group, according to the woke.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:26 AM
9

Yes, nothing says equality like a government based on sex.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:41 AM
13

SOME FGM is, not all involve the removal of the clitoris.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:22 AM
23

Not necessarily there are a number of degrees and methods, that is one.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:20 AM
0

of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female Transitioning does nothing to change your sex, and in the context of biological advantage it only reduces the average males advantage from 20% to 15%, good day.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 10:34 PM
0

"Female" is not gender, it's biology, we have female dogs and female plants, do plants have a gender identity? In the context of their biological state, and the advantage it provides male is the correct term.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 10:26 PM
1

That's not what I said, I was in fact speaking about Laurel Hubbard, who is male, but stating so would be hate speech, even in the context of their biological advantage.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 10:04 PM
2

Except THEY define "racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic", refer to a transwoman as male, even i n the context of biology, transphobic.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:33 AM
3

It's the only "unprotected" group, every other group is "an oppressed minority" with special protections under law.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:30 AM
45

It's simple really they live in echo chambers, that ONLY says "women most effected", so when women make up 60% of University grads they look at the "lack of representation in STEM" (but only certain areas), they SAY that "women's health is underfunded" even when they get most of the health dollar, they believe women are constantly at risk, even when the stats show the opposite.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 09:27 PM
17

Look at movies and TV the "bad guy" is always a white male, if it's anything else then there's a reason they are bad.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 03:16 AM
1

MRA's support men who have been raped, it's not MRA's that are blocking laws that make rape a genderless crime, and I'll doubt you'll find MRA's actually defending rapists, just protesting a system that assumes accusations are evidence.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:59 PM
3

How about the guy in the UK who got arrested for "staring".
/r/MensRights27/06/21 09:25 PM
41

Remember how THEY define "rape" or more importantly "rapey", a boy touched a girl, potential rapist, said something they object to rapey etc
/r/MensRights26/06/21 09:41 PM
8

It's generally easier to prove someone groped you on a train than rape. The train has cameras, your home/the rapists home probably doesn't. I seem to remember a case in the UK (?) that went to court, even though the video evidence clearly showed the complaint was impossible.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 09:33 AM
0

True but it's basically one woman one baby, and we aren't talking about NOW so much as instincts based on millions of years or selective pressure.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:42 AM
1

We don't have artificial wombs or ova yet, so it still depends on females.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 09:20 PM
-8

To be fair they are correct, at it's basis, even if it's never articulated, that's why we value women so much, the survival of our species depends on it.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 08:57 AM
13

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/woman https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/female In medicine particularly the sex of an individual is important, a transwoman cannot become pregnant, or get cervical cancer, a transman may, by refering to a transwoman as a woman you are transmitting false information.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:56 AM
26

No. It is not woman is a nomenclature and scientific term. Transwoman is fine and distinct, woman carries meaning that does not, and cannot apply to a transwoman. Changing the language is an attempt to redefine, terms to broaden definitions to be "inclusive" but is used to redefine things to ignore definitions that have inherent meaning. This allows for such things as transwomen competing against women in sporting events where their innate biological advantage gives them an edge, claiming that a…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:48 AM
37

No. Woman is a specific term, like mare, indicating both a level of sexual maturity and sex, no amount of hormones or surgery can change a male into a female, since they will not have ovaries. However I accept that they can have a "female" mind (gender) and that for those with gender dysphoria appearing to be the sex that matches their gender provides relief.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:37 AM
41

You can change neither, you sex is based on the gametes you should typically produce and your gender is fixed before birth, otherwise you have to come up with another explanation for transgender people.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:29 AM
46

Sure, but it isn't something you can change.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:21 AM
1

I wonder if they will bring up the judges comments about how they got what they negotiated for, and that on an "Hours played" basis they were BETTER paid.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:21 AM
21

Doesn't stop them from claiming that they need "equity" for "historical discrimination".
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:09 PM
7

Sure, and what about masculinity ISN'T regarded as toxic?
/r/MensRights12/06/21 09:23 PM
7

It's a LOT of money, like life changing amounts.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:44 AM
331

Short answer, feminism. Remember boys are innately toxic, they need to be controlled, girls are innocent flowers that are constantly oppressed and need to be lifted up.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:39 AM
12

Yes, yes he is. TBF it's that or being canceled, I mean would you lie through your teeth for that kind of money? I'd be tempted.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:36 AM
2

You really can't. After a certain point of indoctrination they aren't really listening anymore, they hear certain words or phrases and go right to "canned comments", no rational thought, just triggered automatic replies.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:30 AM
19

>"go to therapy". Oh yeah... because I can afford that can I? Fuck off. Do you have any idea how expensive therapy is? Even in the UK, with the NHS, there's a massive waiting list and the dialectical behaviour therapy channels are women-only. Oh it's worse than that, most therapists/counselors ARE women, "progressive" women.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:02 PM
3

Not stupid ideologically blind, it's like "woman's health is under-supported" even though the majority of health funding is directed at women.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:56 PM
2

Every "study" in the last 30 or so years has said that the mother is the MOST important, guess who produced them?
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:51 PM
9

Depends where you are, in Sweden they only arrest the Johns.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:47 AM
53

>The survey found women were twice as likely to feel dismissed by their doctor as men. ​ Operative word here FEEL, seen this crap a lot with progressive propaganda, equating feelings with reality.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:54 AM
6

Because they can't oppress men who don't interact with them.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:52 AM
2

What do you mean start?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:21 AM
3

Well see it's only the problems that are deemed acceptable, so those caused by toxic masculinity, if it's caused by women or toxic femininity it's off limits.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 08:55 AM
8

But,but false allegations are so rare /s
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:55 AM
44

His handlers have told him what to say.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:09 AM
1

Correct they aren't, "woman" is the same as "mare" in that it refers to a adult female of a specific species.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:41 PM
12

It's part of the shaming culture, women are being taught that any attention from "unworthy" men is inherently dangerous, it's got to the point that some are afraid to go outside, will call the cops on a guy walking gown the street and consider any attention from a less than 8 out of 10 guy harassment.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 09:11 PM
4

Remember they believe in "blank slate" they think that people are "trained" to find "Western beauty" standards attractive, while simultaneously most believe that same sex attraction is innate.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:28 AM
3

women who don't view themselves as oppressed lose all value, and their opinions are rejected as worthless. Not...exactly, more that they are rejecting the "higher truth" which makes them a threat.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:27 AM
15

The thing is society now advocates for women who are unhappy, a woman's happiness out ways EVERYTHING, the kids, a mans career, everything, if she isn't happy, irregardless of the reason, she should divorce the guy, take half the assets claim alimony, child support etc.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:49 AM
36

Really? So how come "It's OK to be white" is hate speech?
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:02 AM
2

Same reason Title IX closed sports at universities, more males than females did them.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 09:10 AM
31

If you aren't telling people that you are going off it yes it is.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:41 AM
6

More like they aren't actually trying, it's attention seeking, men go someplace alone and use a rapidly fatal method.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:30 PM
4

Overdose and call their friends/family/boyfriend, not really trying that hard.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:22 PM
4

I think the idea is that if you earn X, and have lifestyle X (mortgage X for example) then losing your job means that your lifestyle suffers more, you are likely o lose your house for example.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:22 PM
1

Also true.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:17 PM
3

We have a lot of hold over from the past, millions of years of evolution don't get altered by thousand's of years of civilization.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:21 AM
3

Like "racist" or "sexist".
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:10 AM
8

The idea is to eliminate the "not hot guys" from the dating pool, it's that 80/20 rule in action.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 09:25 PM
-1

Or "we need to outlaw circumcision" when people talk about FGM as if it happens in the West.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 09:36 AM
1

What does "Yeet" mean in this context?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 12:02 AM
3

Again they don't, the BELIEF of feminists is that some how, irregardless of the law, and reality, women are an underprivileged minority, they dominate in tertiary education, but not in EVERY area so they need to have quotas etc
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:09 PM
2

Perhaps the "" were too subtle, it's a belief, not the truth in the West.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:03 PM
46

Because "men have all the rights" so trying to get them for men is "oppressing women" as it's "taking away from women".
/r/MensRights18/04/21 11:59 PM
46

It was an add for a finance company, not a domestic abuse add, but I would like to see on with men as victims.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 08:04 AM
11

That's the point, to create an environment where only the most desirable men can interact with women, every other guy can be accused of harassment of even a "hate crime".
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:14 PM
2

Yet apparently your a bigot if you think a transwoman should declare that fact before sex.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 06:39 AM
7

Are accusations of criminal action covered by freedom of speech?
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:25 PM
2

Because MATERNITY does, to the mother, and that's all that matters.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:20 PM
12

Because "paternity doesn't matter" basically they want to foist the cost of raising children onto man, look at the laws being pushed to ensure "the father pays half" even if he can't prove if he's the father.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 06:04 AM
8

Same as "heteronormative" with the addition of inferring it's some how bad.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 03:36 AM
1

That would be good, but having dealt with radical feminists, unlikely, it's like dealing with devout religious ideologues, they literally cannot see that they are possibly wrong, I've seen it described as ideological extremism, it fits.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 11:52 AM
3

Ahh I see, well it's not like school boys, 12-13 I believe, are going to say no to what their teachers say, we really should be asking why the teachers thought it was right to do so.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 09:17 AM
1

What do you mean by oblige?
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:48 AM
4

I was referring to the people who use "yes all men" or the ones that got a bunch of school boys to apologize for the "sins of their fathers", if women are using this kind of shaming language.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:18 AM
6

Nope, they want to use the actions of other men as a way of shaming and controlling ALL men, basically the whole idea behind the "male curfew", it also allows them to reverse the burden of proof since "all men are inherently evil/rapists/murderers".
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:42 AM
15

They have included "social science" and well, that area has some issues.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 03:36 AM
13

Remember they have redefined rape in such a way that it increases the numbers, and sex while drunk and the guy split up with you? It was rape.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 11:09 PM
1

Well yes, but no one seems to care, and that's IF it's considered in the same light.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:53 AM
1

Part of that is how harassment has been redefined to be so broad that they can claim "97% of women have been harassed".
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:22 AM
16

It's an echo chamber, they ban anyone who doesn't "fit in".
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:48 AM
1

Partly also because it's good for the narrative, if they EVER admit that men have it worse in some area it may divert attention and resources from them. This shows up clearly in their belief in things that are provably untrue, like "Women's health is neglected" when all the evidence is the reverse, but it must be "true" otherwise how can they keep getting more and more resources for women's health?
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:06 AM
3

>declare how men who don’t have at least 8 inches of cock aren’t worthy of her love. And a six figure salary.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:56 AM
2

Can we add this to the side bar or something? I'd like to be able to refer back to this.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:07 AM
41

Well you don't have to give good answers if no one can ask troublesome questions.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:02 AM
2

That would be hard, require effort, might be risky, whereas complaining about inconsequential bull means that you can push through more and more restrictive laws to control men and give power to women with no risk.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:00 AM
79

Well if you disagree with the hive mind they ban you so....
/r/MensRights26/03/21 05:56 AM
2

That's the point, to indoctrinate young men into believing that they are innately evil.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:38 PM
2

Yes /s.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 12:09 AM
27

Well HE must have done something right?
/r/MensRights22/03/21 06:14 AM
1

That's pretty much why it evolved (culture can evolve right?) in pre-agricultural communities (based on evidence and existing examples) relationships were for limited times, 2-3 years mostly. And the "best man" would get most of the action, which didn't really matter since pretty much everyone in the tribe was related. But once you have agriculture how do you tie men into the economy/society? Well if they have a wife and kids they have something to work for. But now we are starting to see this b…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 02:05 AM
3

OK, I'm an atheist also, but I acknowledge that the basis for the society in most of the Western world is Christian dogma, and that includes monogamy, although TBF culturally enforced monogamy seems to be an emergent factor in the transition from hunter gatherer to settled agriculture. Although typically in the early cultures the tippy toppy of the social hierarchy practiced polygamy.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 11:41 PM
4

Nah. See I'm not even saying it's bad, YOU are, because I'm betting it goes against your religious upbringing, religion was one of the forces brought into play to produce cultural monogamy. You are stating that becasue it doesn't happen in your tiny corner of the world it doesn't happen, the world is a big place. The preagricultural genetic record makes it clear that most men didn't father children, hell France made it illegal for a man to get a paternity test without the mothers permission for …
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:20 PM
2

Nope. Because women could still have children, and from a species level that's all that matters. If we ever colonize other worlds we will send mostly females and a sperm bank.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:11 PM
3

Ever heard the phrase "cultural monogamy" that's what that is, since basically the development of agriculture culture/religious pressures were put in place to maximize male involvement in the cultural structure. Look at Tindr now, women will happily bang the same ~20% of guys, at least until they hit ~35 then they will try to hook a guy to look after them while they have THEIR children.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:09 PM
1

TBF this is the result of a species pressure, any woman that cannot have children is an issue because of the threat to the "tribe", as long as "some" men can father children the tribe survives.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:05 PM
5

It's similar here, they redefined "full time" to exclude people from unemployment benefits.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:23 PM
1

> men venting about women in the comforts of their own homes/male spaces ​ This would now be illegal in Scotland under their hate speech laws.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:19 PM
2

I've had this from men as well, they have been told that MRA's are "woman hating incels" if you ask them if men should have rights they say something like "Men have ALL the rights".
/r/MensRights19/03/21 09:17 PM
3

You do realize that feminists would consider that kind of talk sexist right? That's "pick up artist" stuff.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:19 PM
5

Nope entirely feminist, look at basically EVERY "issue" women face, and they will find a way for it to NEVER be a woman's fault, not earning as much in your job, it's sexism, not because you don't work as many hours or chose a job that pays less, well my job is undervalued because it's done primarily by women, sexism!
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:17 PM
1

It's to create the idea that ALL men need to be "taught not to rape" and that women can/do not need to do anything to protect themselves from bad actors.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:12 PM
13

One effect of testosterone is reduced fear, women LITERALLY feel more fear than men, and modern progressive feminism plays on this for power, they portray the world as a dangerous place for women, and you should give them control to save them..
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:57 AM
3

There are a number of "You've won but I wont admit it" that feminists and SJW's use, insults, name calling, fallacies and platitudes are the main ones.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 08:08 AM
0

Men approaching women is part of the filter, it filters out weak men, and their response filters out the unattractive.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 10:52 PM
1

"Fuck off with that shit"
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:38 AM
1

Please, even if a guy made that kind of appeal almost no one cares.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:29 PM
4

>91% of domestic abuse is against women They will be using a definition (and statistics) that exclude men by design.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 07:33 PM
10

Good luck with that, the tribunals will also be biased, otherwise they are "holding back women", look at the incident in France where they overturned anti discrimination law because it was used AGAINST women, same thing happened in Sweden (or Norway?) with University enrollments.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 07:28 PM
2

It seems to be part of the lymphatic system.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 02:12 AM
2

Remember most DV is reciprocal.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 08:38 PM
1

Fair point, although the USSR was happy to do so about last century.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 06:52 AM
3

I wonder if this is a reason chidden a taught a castrated version of history if any at all. Oh absolutely, same reason that history was edited in the USSR and China.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:01 PM
6

Because they have been convinced that (somehow) after they have torn down the "western colonizers" that a new. fair, totally non-bigoted, world will arise where they will have the power they deserve.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 07:27 PM
7

It's simply "Are they anti-woke? If so they are "alt-right" and lump them together".
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:43 AM
1

Citation required.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:43 AM
1

There method of moderation is quite simple, if you are accused by a woman, banned, no they won't explain which rule you broke, no they won't review the post.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 06:27 AM
4

Nah, in a shooting war they will be relegated (or perhaps promoted) to positions out of the line of fire.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 08:32 PM
-2

More likely they had to take it ti court to avoid being labeled as "not taking assaults on women seriously".
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:33 AM
1

I was trying to imply that it's not true, but it IS what they believe, it's part of their ideology, women are ALWAYS victims, men cannot ever be.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:21 AM
26

Remember men CANNOT BE RAPED, so women are "uniquely vulnerable", it's insane but that's how they think.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 01:42 AM
3

If a guy did the same thing there would be screams of outrage about his "domestic abuse" remember not allowing a woman to spend YOUR money is "financial abuse".
/r/MensRights29/01/21 08:12 AM
2

Oh feminism will talk about it, but only to blame men via "toxic masculinity" what your wife left you for another man and took your kids, well it wouldn't have happened if you'd opened up about your feelings.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 06:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter